The role of CD8+ and CD4+ cells in islet allograft rejection

The requirements of CD8+ and CD4+ cells for islet graft rejection in combinations with different histoincompatibilities were investigated by in vivo administration of anti-Lyt-2.2 (CD8) mAb, anti-L3T4 (CD4) mAb, or both to recipient mice. In B10.AQR----B10.A (H-2K-incompatible) and B10.A(5R)----B10.A (H-2K- and IA-incompatible) combinations, administration of either anti-Lyt-2.2 (CD8) or anti-L3T4 (CD4) mAb completely blocked islet graft rejection, indicating that neither CD8+ cells nor CD4+ cells alone were capable of mediating rejection, and that collaboration of CD8+ cells and CD4+ cells was necessary. On the other hand, in the BALB/c----B6 (H-2- and non-H-2-incompatible) combination, administration of anti-Lyt-2.2 (CD8) or anti-L3T4 (CD4) mAb resulted in rejection of most of the grafts, although survival was prolonged significantly, and administration of both anti-Lyt-2.2 (CD8) and anti-L3T4 (CD4) mAb together completely blocked rejection. These results suggested that either CD8+ or CD4+ cells were capable of mediating rejection, but that rejection was maximal in the presence of both T cell subsets. Immunohistochemical analyses showed marked depletion of CD8+ cells and CD4+ cells in grafted islets as well as spleens when anti-Lyt-2.2 (CD8) and anti-L3T4 (CD4) mAb, respectively, were injected.     

Selective rejection of porcine islet xenografts by macrophages

Abstract:  Background: Our previous study has shown that porcine antigen‐primed and CD4+ T cell‐activated macrophages are capable of recognition and rejection of porcine xenografts after adoptive transfer. However, whether this is an absolute xenograft specific rejection remains to be confirmed. Methods:  Mouse islet allografts and neonatal porcine islet cell cluster (NICC) xenografts were admixed and transplanted under the left kidney capsule, and NICC xenografts alone were transplanted under the right kidney capsule of strepotozotocin‐induced diabetic NOD‐SCID mice. After achievement of normoglycemia, the NOD‐SCID recipients were transferred with macrophages purified from NICC transplant NOD‐SCID mice reconstituted with CD4+ T cells. Five weeks after macrophage transfer the left kidney with the admixed grafts were removed. Graft survival and function following macrophage transfer was assessed by blood glucose measurement and immunohistochemistry. Results and conclusions:  Adoptive transfer with activated macrophages did not affect the normalized blood glucose levels in NOD‐SCID recipients of admixed grafts until left nephrectomy 5 weeks post‐macrophage transfer. Insulin‐positive and porcine C‐peptide‐negative mouse islets were detected in the admixed grafts. The surviving mouse islets in the admixed grafts were surrounded but not infiltrated by macrophages. The nephrectomized recipients demonstrated sustained hyperglycemia and completely destroyed NICC xenografts in their remaining right kidneys 8 weeks after macrophage transfer. Taken together, these data provide direct evidence of porcine islet xenograft specific rejection by activated macrophages.     

CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T-cells inhibit the islet innate immune response and promote islet engraftment

Early islet cell loss is a significant problem in clinical islet cell transplantation. Diverse stress stimuli induce innate immune responses in islets that contribute to beta-cell dysfunction, inflammation, and loss. Here, we show that cytokine-stimulated murine islets express multiple inflammatory chemokines that recruit T-cells and thereby impair islet function in vitro and in vivo. Both nonislet ductal and exocrine elements and the individual islet cellular components contribute to this innate immune response. CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T-cells inhibit islet chemokine expression through a cell contact-dependent, soluble factor-independent mechanism and inhibit effector T-cell migration to the islet. Regulatory T-cells can also migrate to stimulated islets. Cotransfer of regulatory T-cells with islets in a transplantation model prevents islet innate immune responses and inflammation and preserves normal architecture and engraftment. Regulatory T-cell inhibition of multiple components of innate immune responses may be a fundamental aspect of their function that influences ischemia-reperfusion injury and adaptive immunity.     

Immune mechanisms associated with the rejection of encapsulated neonatal porcine islet xenografts

BACKGROUND: The immune mechanisms associated with the rejection of microencapsulated neonatal porcine islets (NPI) are not clearly understood. Therefore, in this study we characterized the immune cells and molecules that are involved in this process by examining the microencapsulated NPI xenografts at various time points post-transplantation in B6 mice. METHODS: Microencapsulated NPI were transplanted into streptozotocin-induced diabetic immune-competent B6 and immune-deficient B6 rag-/- mice and blood glucose levels were monitored twice a week. Encapsulated NPI were then recovered from B6 mice at various time points post-transplantation to characterize the islets and immune response using immunohistochemical and RT-PCR analyses. To determine which T-cell subpopulation is important for the rejection of encapsulated NPI, B6 rag-/- mice with established microencapsulated NPI xenografts were reconstituted with either CD4(+) or CD8(+) T cells and a return to the diabetic state was noted. For controls, adoptive transfer experiments involved reconstitution of B6 rag-/- mice with established microencapsulated NPI with non-fractionated lymph node cells or non-reconstituted mice. RESULTS: All B6 recipients of microencapsulated NPI remained diabetic throughout the study while B6 rag-/- recipients achieved normoglycemia and maintained normoglycemia for up to 100 days post-transplantation. Encapsulated NPI recovered from B6 mice at early time points (day 7 and day 14) post-transplantation were surrounded with very few layers of immune cells that increased with time post-transplantation. The extent of cellular overgrowth on the surface of encapsulated NPI has a significant correlation with islet cell death and the presence of CD4(+) T cells, B cells and macrophages. Mouse IgG antibody and complement as well as cytokines [gamma-interferon (IFN-gamma), interleukin10 (IL10)] and chemokines (monocyte chemotactic protein-1 and macrophage inflammatory protein-1alpha and beta) were detected within the microcapsules at several time points post-transplantation suggesting that these molecules can traverse the microcapsule. Mouse anti-porcine IgG antibodies in recipient sera were found to peak at 30 days post-transplantation indicating leakage of porcine xenoantigens. In contrast, microencapsulated NPI recovered from B6 rag-/- mice had no cellular overgrowth on the surface. Complement and cytokines (IL 10 but not IFN-gamma) including chemokines were detected within the microcapsules at several days post-transplantation. We also found that B6 rag-/- mice reconstituted with non-fractionated lymph node cells or CD4(+) T cells but not CD8(+) T cells became diabetic demonstrating that CD4(+) T cells are the necessary T-cell subtype for microencapsulated NPI rejection. In contrast, non-reconstituted B6 rag-/- mice remained normoglycemic for the entire duration of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that CD4(+) T cells, B cells and macrophages are the immune cells recruited to and involved in the rejection of encapsulated NPI. Immune molecules secreted by these cells as well as complement can traverse the microcapsule membrane and are responsible for destroying the NPI cells. Treatment regimens which target these molecules may modify the rejection of encapsulated NPI and lead to prolonged islet xenograft survival.     

Rejection of porcine islet xenografts mediated by CD4+ T cells activated through the indirect antigen recognition pathway

We have previously demonstrated that human T cells responding to porcine islets are primarily CD4+ and recognized porcine major histocompatibility complex class I molecules through the indirect pathway of antigen presentation. To determine whether this mechanism is responsible for rejection of adult porcine islets xenografts, porcine islets from adult pigs were transplanted under the kidney capsule of streptozotocin-treated CD4-knockout (KO), CD8-KO, Ig-KO and normal C57BL/6 mice. Islet xenografts were acutely rejected with similar kinetics when transplanted into normal C57BL/6 (MST=17.6 +/- 3.5 days) and Ig-KO (MST=19.0 +/- 1.7 days) mice. Interestingly, islet xenografts were rejected significantly earlier when transplanted into CD8-KO mice as compared with normal C57BL/6 (MST=7.0 +/- 0.01 days, P=2 x 10-4). Histopathological analysis revealed classical acute cellular rejection with severe diffuse interstitial cellular infiltrates in all rejected islet xenografts. In contrast, islet xenografts were not rejected when transplanted into CD4-KO mice (MST >/= 100 days, P=1 x 10-9). Histopathological analysis revealed no cellular infiltrates and intact islet xenografts. CD4+ T cells from both normal C57BL/6 and CD8-KO xenograft recipients showed detectable proliferative responses to porcine islets in the presence but not in the absence of syngeneic antigen-presenting cells. In addition, the anti-islet proliferative responses observed in normal C57BL/6 mice were significantly lower than those observed in CD8-KO mice. IgG anti-porcine antibodies were readily detected in C57BL/6 and CD8-KO xenograft recipients but not in Ig-KO or CD4-KO recipients. These results indicate that indirectly activated CD4+ T cells mediate acute rejection of adult porcine islet xenografts and that xenoreactive CD8+ T cells and antibodies are not necessary in this process.     

The role of CD4+ helper T cells in the destruction of microencapsulated islet xenografts in nod mice

Islet transplants for large numbers of patients with diabetes will require xenografts. Microencapsulation is an appealing method for islet xenografting. However, graft function has been limited by a cellular reaction, particularly intense in spontaneously diabetic, NOD mice. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the mechanism of this reaction. Poly-1-lysine-alginate microcapsules containing 4000-12,000 dog or 1800-2000 rat islets were xenografted intraperitoneally into streptozotocin (SZN)-diabetic C57BL/6J and NOD mice, with or without recipient treatment with GK 1.5 (anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody) (20-30 microliters i.p. every 5 days, begun on day -7. Grafts were considered technically successful if random blood glucose (BG) was normalized (less than 150 mg/dl) within 36 hr. Graft failure was defined as BG greater than 250 mg/dl. Dog and rat islets in microcapsules normalized BG in both SZN and NOD mice within 24 hr routinely. Empty microcapsules and GK 1.5 treatments alone did not affect BG. NODs destroyed both microencapsulated dog and rat islets more rapidly than did SZN-diabetic mice (P less than .01). Graft biopsies showed an intense cellular reaction, composed of lymphocytes, macrophages and giant cells, and no viable islets. GK 1.5 treatment significantly prolonged both dog-to-NOD and rat-to-NOD grafts (P less than 0.01). Biopsies of long-term functioning grafts (on days 65-85) demonstrated viable islets and no cellular reaction around microcapsules; 1/4 rat and 1/8 dog islet xenografts continued to function indefinitely in NOD recipients, even after cessation of GK 1.5 therapy. Prediabetic NODs receiving encapsulated dog or rat islets mounted a moderate cellular reaction to grafts. Empty microcapsules excited no cellular reaction in diabetic or prediabetic NODs. We conclude that the NOD reaction to microencapsulated xenogeneic islets is helper T cell-dependent, and that the target of this reaction is not the microcapsule itself, but the donor cells within.     

Role of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the rejection of concordant pancreas xenografts

BACKGROUND: We studied the ability of CD4 and CD8 T cells to induce rejection of pancreas xenografts in a concordant combination using rat pancreas xenografts as donors and chemically induced diabetic mice as recipients. METHODS: Lewis rat (2 to 3 weeks old) pancreas xenografts were transplanted into streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic mice. Lymphocyte proliferation and cytokine production were analyzed in vitro. All pancreas xenografts were assessed by functional (blood glucose) and histopathologic examinations. RESULTS: Lewis rat pancreas grafts were rejected within 10 to 13 days, with mononuclear cell infiltrate and tissue necrosis in STZ-induced diabetic mice. A predominant T cell receptor alphabeta -CD4 cell (on day 4) and T cell receptor alphabeta -CD8 cell (on day 8) infiltrate and IgM deposition were found in the pancreas xenografts after transplantation. Anti-CD4 (GK1.5), but not anti-CD8 (YTS169.4), monoclonal antibodies resulted in a prolonged survival of Lewis rat pancreas xenografts. Lewis pancreas xenografts were permanently accepted by CD4 knockout mice but not by CD8 knockout mice. The pancreas xenografts were acutely rejected with a mean survival time of 15.3 days in B cell-deficient mice (microMT/microMT). Transfer of CD4 but not CD8 spleen cells from na?ve C57BL/6 mice into Rag2 mice led to acute rejection of transplanted pancreas xenografts. However, activated CD8 spleen cells elicited rejection of Lewis rat pancreas xenografts in SZT-induced diabetic mice. CONCLUSION: The current results show that CD4 T cells are necessary and sufficient for mediating the rejection of Lewis rat pancreas xenografts in STZ-induced diabetic mice. However, CD8 cells, when activated, can also induce acute rejection of concordant pancreas xenografts.     

Immunosuppression with FTY720 and cyclosporine A inhibits rejection of adult porcine islet xenografts in rats

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to evaluate the effect of FTY720 in discordant islet xenotransplantation. METHODS: Fetal porcine islet-like cell clusters (ICCs) were transplanted into normoglycemic rats that were either left untreated or treated with FTY720 only, with FTY720 plus cyclosporine A (CsA) or with CsA only. Twelve or 24 days after transplantation, graft morphology was evaluated immunohistochemically. Furthermore, adult porcine islets (APIs) were transplanted into diabetic rats immunosuppressed with FTY720 plus CsA. Blood glucose and porcine C-peptide levels were monitored. RESULTS: In untreated rats, the ICC xenografts were completely rejected after 12 days. Treatment with CsA had only a marginal effect on the rejection. In animals given FTY720, only the number of infiltrating cells was somewhat reduced. However, at 12 days, no intact ICCs remained. Immunosuppression with FTY720 plus CsA had a marked inhibitory effect on islet xenograft rejection and plentiful morphologically intact ICCs remained. Twelve days after transplantation, only occasional macrophages and T cells could be detected. At 24 days after transplantation, the findings were similar. Furthermore, diabetic rats transplanted with APIs and immunosuppressed with FTY720 plus CsA remained normoglycemic for 53.0+/-15.8 days. In fact, one animal remained normoglycemic for more than 100 days. Serum levels of porcine C-peptide remained at levels similar to those for human C-peptide in healthy individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Immunosuppression with FTY720 plus CsA inhibited almost all morphological signs of pig-to-rat islet xenograft rejection for up to 24 days after transplantation. Diabetic rats transplanted with APIs and immunosuppressed with FTY720 plus CsA remained normoglycemic for 53.0+/-15.8 days.     

Role of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the rejection of heart or islet xenografts in recipients with xenotolerance in the innate immune compartment

To further study the interactions between innate and adaptive immunity in xenotransplantation, we explored the relative contribution of T-cell subsets in vascularized (heart) and cellular (islets) xenografts in a model with established xeno-non-reactivity of the innate system. MATERIALS: Specific innate xenotolerance was induced in xenoheart (hamster) recipients (nude rats) by a tolerizing regimen (TR), consisting of donor antigen infusion, temporary natural killer (NK)-cell depletion and a 4-week administration of leflunomide. Hamster pancreatic islets were transplanted either 1 week after heart transplantation or alone and syngeneic T-cell adoptive transfer was performed 10 days later. Purified CD3(+), CD4(+), and CD8(+) T cells were given 2 weeks after withdrawal of all drugs. At the day of rejection, xenografts were removed for histology. Serum was taken and IgM and IgG xenoantibody titers were measured by flow cytometry. RESULTS: Both heart and islet grafts were rejected after CD4(+) reconstitution. After CD8(+) T-cell adoptive transfer, cellular grafts were not rejected but vascularized grafts were rejected, although only after several months. Rejection in CD4(+) reconstituted nude rats was accompanied by the generation of predominantly IgG xenoantibodies. CONCLUSION: CD4(+) T lymphocytes are able to rapidly initiate the rejection of islet xenografts in the presence of a xenotolerant innate immune system either by breaking the "innate tolerance" (e.g., by activating macrophages and NK-cells) or through a mechanism without any involvement of the innate tolerance (e.g., T-dependent IgG antibody production). In contrast, CD8(+) T cells provoke a late rejection of only xenoheart grafts.     

Resistance of established porcine islet xenografts to humoral rejection by hyperimmune sera.

BACKGROUND: Although preformed natural antibodies cause hyperacute rejection of primarily vascularized xenografts, tissue grafts such as skin or islets are revascularized by in-growth of host capillaries and therefore might be resistant to circulating antibodies. We examined the effect of hyperimmune serum and primed T cells on the survival of long-term porcine islet xenografts in diabetic nude mice. METHODS: Porcine islets were transplanted beneath the kidney capsule of streptozotocin-induced diabetic BALB/c athymic mice. Hyperimmune serum and sensitized splenocytes were prepared by repeated immunization of BALB/c mice with porcine lymph node cells. Splenic T cells were enriched by nylon wool column separation. Tissues were examined by immunohistology using murine- and porcine-specific monoclonal antibodies. RESULTS: Porcine islets survived in nude mice for > 100 days with high levels of circulating porcine C-peptide and maintenance of normoglycemia. Injection of the hyperimmune sera (IgG) into normoglycemic nude mice bearing porcine islets for > 70 days failed to induce rejection despite the continued presence of circulating anti-porcine cytotoxic antibody. Injection of sensitized T cells caused acute rejection of long-term (>140 days) porcine islets, whereas injection of naive T cells had no effect. Histologically, porcine islets removed from mice treated with hyperimmune serum showed no staining for IgG. Long-surviving porcine islet grafts showed strong staining for interleukin (IL)-10 and a lesser amount of IL-4 but no staining for IL-2 or interferon-gamma. Although fresh porcine islets were positive for swine leukocyte antigen class 1 antigen and intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 but negative for mouse platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule and ICAM-2, long-surviving porcine islets showed positive endothelial staining for mouse platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule and ICAM-2. CONCLUSIONS: Established islet xenografts are resistant to hyperimmune serum as a result of a lack of target endothelial antigens, whereas they remain susceptible to rejection caused by primed T cells. Local production of Th2 cytokines may explain the inability of long-surviving islet xenografts to activate injected naive T cells.     

Antibody-induced rejection of pig proislet xenografts in CD4+ T cell-depleted diabetic mice

Reversal of diabetes in mice was achieved following in vivo depletion of host CD4+ T cells and transplantation of xenogeneic fetal pig proislets (pancreatic islet precursors). These procedures resulted in xenograft tolerance since established pig proislet xenografts were not rejected by antipig antibodies produced in the host, and rejection was not induced following the administration of donor major histocompatibility complex--specific pig lymphocytes. Proislet xenografts were rejected following the administration of donor MHC-specific hyper-immune antipig PBL serum raised in normal mice. Although established proislet xenografts in anti-CD4-treated mice are sensitive to antibody-mediated destruction, such hosts are unable to produce an antibody response that leads to graft rejection. The study indicates that the mechanism of preventing xenograft rejection by anti-CD4 treatment in vivo involves not only initial CD4+ T cell depletion but also quantitative and/or qualitative modulation of a CD4+ T cell-dependent antibody response. As a consequence, an apparent state of xenograft tolerance is produced.     

Reversal of diabetes in non-immunosuppressed rhesus macaques by intraportal porcine islet xenografts precedes acute cellular rejection

BACKGROUND: The functional response and immunobiology of primarily non-vascularized islet cell xenografts remain poorly defined in non-human primates. METHODS: We transplanted 20,000 adult porcine islet equivalents/kg (purified and cultured for 48-h) intraportally into six streptozotocin-diabetic and two non-diabetic rhesus macaques. Two recipients were killed at various intervals post-transplant for histologic examination of livers bearing xenografts. RESULTS: Plasma glucose levels in diabetic recipients averaged 94 mg/dl at 12 h, 92 mg/dl at 24 h, 147 mg/dl at 48 h, and 157 mg/dl at 72 h post-transplant. Serum porcine C-peptide was present in eight of eight recipients at 12 h, in five of six at 24 h, in four of four at 48 h, and in one of two at 72 h post-transplant. C3a and SC5b-9 plasma levels increased at 12 h post-transplant and returned to pre-transplant levels by 24 h. IgG, IgM anti-pig and anti-Gal IgG serum antibody levels did not increase post-transplant. Rejection was initiated by IgM and complement deposition on islets. Neutrophils dominated the cellular infiltrate at 12 h; CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were the main infiltrating cells at 24, 48, and 72 h; and macrophages increasingly infiltrated xenografts starting at 24 h post-transplant. Numerous xenoislets were present at all time points; their proportion without intraislet infiltrates decreased from 65% at 24 h to 17% at 72 h post-transplant. CONCLUSIONS: Pig-to-primate intraportal islet xenografts reverse diabetes and the majority of intraportally transplanted xenogeneic islets are not subject to hyperacute rejection. They undergo acute cellular rejection mediated by CD4+- and CD8+ T cells and macrophages.     

Tissue culture prevents hyperacute rejection of islet xenografts

Abstract: Despite some notable successes in recent years, it has become clear that the use of human islets of the purpose of curing diabetes by isle transplantation is not a practical solution for the treatment of the large number of diabetic patients who could potentially benefit from such a procedure. The major reason for this conclusion is that the yield of islets obtainable from the average human pancreas is relatively low, and the numbers of suitable human cadaveric donors are few. By using islets obtained from the pancreas of an ethically acceptable nonhuman donor such as the pig, it should be easily possible to obtain sufficient islet tissue to transplant as many patients as necessary, but the problems of tissue availability are replaced by those of xenograft rejection.     

The critical role of mouse CD4+ cells in the rejection of highly disparate xenogeneic pig thymus grafts

Long-term survival of fetal pig thymus (FP THY) grafts and efficient repopulation of mouse CD4+ T cells is achieved in thymectomized (ATX) B6 mice that receive T and NK cell depletion by injection of a cocktail of mAbs (GK1.5, 2.43, 30-H12, and PK136) and fetal pig thymus/liver (FP THY/LIV) grafts. The requirement for each mAb in this conditioning regimen in order to avoid the rejection of FP THY grafts has not yet been defined. In our present studies, CD4 cell-depleted ATX B6 mice and euthymic MHC class II-deficient (IIKO) mice were employed to investigate the role of mouse CD4+ cells in the rejection of FP THY grafts in vivo. After grafting FP THY/LIV to CD4+ cell-depleted ATX B6 mice, efficient repopulation of mouse CD4+ T cells was observed in the periphery. However, only two of four mice had remaining FP THY grafts by 17 weeks post-implantation, and these were of poor quality, whereas four of four T and NK cell-depleted ATX B6 mice had well-developed FP THY grafts. Furthermore, three of four FP THY/LIV-grafted, CD4+ cell-depleted ATX B6 mice rejected donor MHC-matched pig skin grafts. In contrast, three of three FP THY/LIV grafted, T and NK cell-depleted, ATX B6 mice accepted donor MHC-matched pig skin grafts, suggesting that optimal tolerance to xenogeneic pig antigens was not achieved in mice conditioned only with anti-CD4 mAb. ATX B6 mice treated with only anti-CD8 mAb rejected FP THY completely by 6 weeks post-grafting, a time when CD4+ cell-depleted ATX B6 mice had well-vascularized FP THY grafts. In addition, when euthymic IIKO mice were pre-treated with the standard conditioning regimen that includes four different mAbs, FP THY grafts survived and supported the repopulation of mouse CD4+ T cells in the periphery, while high levels of mouse CD8+ T cells developed in host thymi. These studies suggest that mouse CD4+ T cells play a critical role in the acute rejection of xenogeneic FP THY grafts. Without help from CD4+ cells, mouse CD8+ cells, NK, NK/T, and TCR(gamma/delta)+ T cells do not mediate acute rejection of FP THY grafts. Furthermore, our results suggest that other cell subsets besides CD4+ T cells play a role in the delayed rejection of highly disparate xenogeneic FP THY grafts.     

In vivo control of diabetogenic T-cells by regulatory CD4+CD25+ T-cells expressing Foxp3

To understand the ability of regulatory T-cells to control diabetes development in clinically relevant situations, we established a new model of accelerated diabetes in young DP-BB rats by transferring purified T-cells from DR-BB rats made acutely diabetic. Transfer of 3, 5, 10, or 23 million pure in vitro-activated T-cells accelerated diabetes onset in >90% of the recipients, with the degree of acceleration being dosage dependent. Cotransfer of unfractionated leukocytes from healthy donors prevented diabetes. Full protection was achieved when protective cells were transferred 3-4 days before diabetogenic cells, whereas transfer 2 days before conferred only partial protection. Protection resided in the CD4(+) fraction, as purified CD4(+) T-cells prevented the accelerated diabetes. When CD25(+) cells were depleted from these cells before they were transferred, their ability to prevent diabetes was impaired. In contrast, two million CD4(+)CD25(+) cells (expressing Foxp3) prevented the accelerated diabetes when transferred both before and simultaneously with the diabetogenic T-cells. In addition, 2 million CD4(+)CD25(+) T-cells prevented spontaneous diabetes, even when given to rats age 42 days, whereas 20 million CD4(+)CD25(-) cells (with low Foxp3 expression) were far less effective. We thus demonstrated that CD4(+)CD25(+) cells exhibit powerful regulatory potential in rat diabetes.     

CD8+ T cells are capable of rejecting pancreatic islet xenografts

BACKGROUND: In this study, the capacity of CD8+ T cells to act as a potential effector mechanism in pancreatic xenograft rejection was examined. METHODS: The fate of pancreatic islet xenografts was studied in mice deficient in MHC class II molecules and CD4+ T cells. Fetal pig pancreas (FPP) or Wistar rat islets (RI) were transplanted into nondiabetic or streptozotocin-induced diabetic I-A knock-out (CII K/O) mice. RESULTS: CII K/O mice were capable of rejecting both RI and FPP grafts. RI graft survival was not prolonged compared with wild type C57BL/6 controls. However, FPP grafts did survive longer in CII K/O recipients than in C57BL/J6 mice. Both RI and FPP graft rejection were CD8+ T-cell phenomena in CII K/O mice, as anti-CD8 monoclonal antibody prolonged graft survival, there were increased CD8+ T cells in the grafts and spleens of CII K/O recipients, and cell-mediated cytotoxicity was a CD8+ T-cell phenomenon associated with activation of the perforin/granzyme B system. By contrast, RI and FPP graft rejection was a CD4+ T cell-dependent phenomenon in wild type C57BL/6 mice with graft survival prolonged by anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody. There were increased numbers of CD4+ T cells, and cell-mediated cytotoxicity was a CD4+ T-cell phenomenon associated with activation of the Fas/FasL lytic pathway. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that, in the absence of CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells were capable of rejecting both rat and pig pancreatic islet xenografts.     

Pathogenesis of coxsackievirus-B5 acquired from intra-renal porcine islet cell xenografts in diabetic mice

Abstract: Background:  We previously demonstrated the ability of a human isolate of coxsackievirus-B5 (CVB5) to infect productively adult porcine islet cells (PICs) in vitro. PICs infected with CVB5 remain viable, and upon transplantation reversed diabetes in C56BL/6 mice for up to 5 days.
Methods:  In the present work, we expanded this graft-to-host xenozoonosis model by examining the long-term functionality of CVB5-infected PIC xenografts in immunosuppressed mice. And, we characterized the pathogenesis of CVB5 infection in mice resulting from directional transmission of the virus from PIC xenografts to surrounding tissues in a mouse model for immunosuppressed human PIC xenograft recipients.
Results:  Both acutely (12 h) and chronically (72 h) infected PIC xenografts functioned in vivo to reverse diabetes in mice. The efficacy of both infected and un-infected PICs was transient beyond 5 days post-inoculation and the long-term functionality of the grafts was compromised by host-to-graft rejection. CVB5-infected PIC xenografts transmitted infectious virus to immunosuppressed recipient mice resulting in extensive histopathologic changes. The virus replicated in the heart, liver, spleen, kidney, pancreas, brain and skeletal muscle in higher levels in severe-combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice that were directly inoculated with virus when compared to controls. In addition, infectious virus was recovered for up to 22 days after inoculation in SCID mice whereas it was only detected up to Day 4 PI in non-SCID mice.
Conclusions:  Immunosuppressed PIC xenograft recipients may be more susceptible to infection with CVB5 which could target the xenograft leading to disseminated infection in the host.