Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Cutaneous Melanoma: A Case-Control Study

Abstarct Background Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the most precise method for staging invasive cutaneous melanoma, but its therapeutic effect has been difficult to assess, and SLNB is not routinely used in all melanoma treatment centers. Methods This case-control study of 305 prospective SLNB patients compared them with 616 retrospective patients who had not undergone invasive nodal staging at diagnosis. Thin melanomas were included in both study groups. Results A total of 50 SLNB patients were sentinel positive (16.4%) and 255 were sentinel negative (83.6%). A total of 49 of the 50 sentinel-positive patients underwent completion lymph node dissection, and 9 of them (18%) had additional metastases in the nonsentinel nodes. The false-negative rate was 1.6% (five same-basin nodal recurrences during follow-up). There was a significant difference in melanoma-related overall survival (OS) between sentinel-positive and sentinel-negative patients (P < .001). The tumor burden of the sentinel nodes was a significant prognostic factor for melanoma-related OS (P < .001). There was no significant difference in melanoma-related OS or disease-free survival between the study groups, but the nodal disease-free survival was significantly longer among the SLNB patients (P = .004). Conclusions SLNB is recommended for routine use in the treatment of cutaneous melanoma because the sentinel node status carries unique prognostic information on the survival of melanoma patient. Improved regional disease control is an obvious therapeutic advantage of SLNB and immediate completion lymph node dissection.     

Lymphoscintigraphy, Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy, and Mohs Micrographic Surgery in the Treatment of Merkel Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive cutaneous malignancy with a high incidence of occult nodal metastases. MCC is believed to be similar in natural history to thick or ulcerated melanomas in its propensity for locoregional recurrence and early lymph node metastasis. Studies have shown that nodal status is statistically correlated to survival in MCC. Radiolocalization and superselective lymph node biopsy is a recent technique that has been proven to be of great value in evaluating the status of occult lymph node disease in malignant melanoma and breast cancer patients. OBJECTIVE: In previously untreated patients, an orderly progression of metastases is observed for both cutaneous carcinomas and malignant melanomas and is anticipated for MCC. METHODS/RESULTS. We present two patients with MCC of the head and neck who underwent simultaneous Mohs micrographic surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy with intraoperative radiolocalization. CONCLUSION: Sentinel lymph node biopsy and intraoperative lymphoscintigraphy may prove to be a useful technique in evaluating occult nodal involvement and in limiting the potentially unnecessary morbidity of more comprehensive lymph node dissections in MCC patients who do not yet have metastatic involvement.     

Sentinel node biopsy in cutaneous melanoma.

Status of the regional lymph nodes is a strong prognostic factor in patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) and can be assessed by sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). We present our technique of preoperative lymphatic mapping and intraoperative vital dye and handheld gamma probe. Our results and three years follow-up of its routine use in 198 patients with verified primary CMM are presented. Median follow-up time was 24 months (range 1-47). Metastatic regional lymph node disease was found by SLNB in 61 patients (31%) and additional metastatic nodes were found by formal node dissection in 30% of these cases. Complications were relatively mild but included one case of lymphoedema in a node negative patient. By follow-up, 13% had developed a recurrence including 26% of node positive patients and 8% of node negative patients. Mortality was also substantially higher in node positive cases with 18% dying in the follow-up period and 3% in the node negative group. The SLNB procedure was associated with a false negative rate of 8%. Using the presented technique, we found that SLNB was a useful procedure for staging patients with CMM and for selecting patients for more extensive metastatic screening and inclusion in trials of adjuvant treatments.     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in desmoplastic melanoma – the percent desmoplastic component matters: A systematic review

BackgroundDesmoplastic melanoma (DM) is a less common form of cutaneous melanoma that has been described for decades; however, controversy remains regarding the management and use of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). The purpose of this study is to identify whether SLNB is indicated in all cases of DM, including the pure subtype.MethodsA systematic review was conducted using PubMed (with access to MEDLINE) along with the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 2001 to 2019. Case series and case-control studies were included.ResultsEighteen studies were included for a total population of 3,914 patients. SLNB was performed in 2229 patients. The percentage of positive SLNB results was 8.5%. However, patients with pure DM (>90% desmoplastic component) were found to have a significantly lower rate of occult metastatic node positivity when compared with that of mixed DM (4.9% and 14.8%, respectively).ConclusionsOur findings underscore the importance of the pathologist reporting percentage of desmoplastic component in melanoma. SLNB should be strongly considered for patients with mixed DM. However, the low rate of occult metastatic node positivity in pure DM is beneath the threshold for using SLNB as a staging procedure.SummaryPrevious studies have suggested that desmoplastic melanoma is less likely to metastasize to regional lymph nodes when compared with conventional melanoma. This review suggests that it is imperative to distinguish the histologic subtype of desmoplastic melanoma to determine if staging procedure is indicated.     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of patients with primary cutaneous melanoma: review of a large single-institutional experience with an emphasis on recurrence

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the authors' experience with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and the subsequent incidence and pattern of recurrence in patients with positive and negative nodes. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Lymphatic mapping with SLNB has become widely accepted in the management of patients with melanoma who are at risk for occult regional lymph node metastases. Because this procedure is relatively new, the pattern of recurrence after SLNB is not yet clear. METHODS: All patients with primary cutaneous melanoma who underwent SLNB from 1991 through 1998 were identified from a prospective single-institution melanoma database. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-seven consecutive patients with localized primary cutaneous melanoma who underwent SLNB were identified. The sentinel node was identified in 332 patients (93%) and was positive in 56 (17%). Fourteen percent of patients had developed a recurrence at a median follow-up of 24 months. The median time to recurrence was 13 months. The 3-year relapse-free survival rates for patients with positive and negative nodes were 56% and 75%, respectively. SLN status was the most important predictor of disease recurrence. The site of first recurrence in patients with negative and positive nodes was more commonly locoregional than distant. Reexamination of the SLN in 11 patients with negative nodes with initial nodal and in-transit recurrence showed evidence of metastases in 7 (64%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with positive sentinel nodes have a significantly increased risk for recurrence. The early pattern of first recurrence for patients with negative and positive results is characterized by a preponderance of locoregional sites, similar to that reported in previous series of elective lymph node dissection. These data underscore the need for careful pathologic analysis of the SLN as well as a careful, directed locoregional physical examination in the follow-up of these patients.     

Sentinel node biopsy prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND: Several studies have explored sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, but false negative rates and the loss of pretreatment nodal staging are limitations. Sentinel lymph node biopsy prior to induction chemotherapy may address both. METHODS: Sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed in clinically node negative patients prior to initiating chemotherapy. Standard level I/II axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was performed at the time of surgery in those patients who had metastases in the sentinel lymph node (SLN). RESULTS: Twenty-five patients had 26 SLNB prior to the initiation of chemotherapy. The SLN was identified in all cases (100%). Twelve patients (48%) were found to be node negative and did not require axillary node dissection after chemotherapy. Of the patients who were SLN positive and underwent completion ALND, residual nodal disease was identified in 60%. There were no surgical complications or delay of chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Sentinel lymph node biopsy prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy can avoid the morbidity of ALND without compromising the accuracy of axillary staging. It allows for identification of node positive patients subsequently rendered disease free in the regional nodes, which can assist in planning additional chemotherapy or radiation.     

Role of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in the Staging of Synovial, Epithelioid, and Clear Cell Sarcomas

Background  Soft tissue sarcomas generally have a ≤5% risk of lymph node metastasis, but synovial, epithelioid, and clear cell subtypes reportedly have a much higher risk. The utility of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for patients with these sarcoma subtypes is unknown. Methods  29 patients with nonmetastatic synovial, epithelioid, and clear cell sarcomas who underwent SLNB were examined. Results  Median age was 35 years (range 11–73 years), and 69% were male. Tumors were located in the lower extremity in 17 patients and the upper extremity in 12. The histological subtypes were synovial sarcoma in 16 patients, epithelioid sarcoma in 10, and clear cell sarcoma in 3. All patients had a staging chest computed tomography (CT) scan, none of which were suspicious, and 20 patients had staging positron emission tomography (PET) scans (16 negative, 3 indeterminate, and 1 suspicious). All patients had resection of their primary tumor. At least one sentinel node was found in 28 patients (97%), and the median number of sentinel nodes identified was 2 (range 1–4). One patient had a positive sentinel node on routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and developed lung metastases. Two patients had positive sentinel nodes following immunohistochemical staining, and both remain disease free despite not undergoing completion lymphadenectomy. One patient developed a lymph node metastasis after a negative SLNB. Conclusion  For patients with these sarcoma subtypes without radiological evidence of nodal or distant metastases, the incidence of occult lymph node metastasis is relatively low. Determining utility of SLNB may require a multicenter trial.     

Selective lymphadenectomy in patients with Merkel cell (cutaneous neuroendocrine) carcinoma

Background: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive cutaneous tumor with a propensity for local recurrence, regional and distant metastases. There are no well-defined prognostic factors that predict behavior of this tumor, nor are treatment guidelines well established. Methods: Staging of patients with a new diagnosis of MCC was attempted using selective lymphadenectomy concurrent with primary excision. Preoperative and intraoperative mapping, excision, and thorough histologic evaluation of the first lymph node draining the tumor primary site [sentinel node] was performed. Patients with tumor metastasis in the sentinel node underwent complete resection of the remainder of the lymph node basin. Results: Twelve patients underwent removal of 22 sentinel nodes. Two patients demonstrated metastatic disease in their sentinel lymph nodes, and complete dissection of the involved nodal basin revealed additional positive nodes. The node-negative patients received no further surgical therapy, with no evidence of recurrent local or regional disease at a maximum of 26 months follow-up (median 10.5 months). Conclusions: While the data are preliminary and initial follow-up is limited, early results suggest that sentinel lymph node mapping and excision may be a useful adjunct in the treatment of MCC. This technique may identify a population of patients who would benefit from further surgical lymph node excision.     

Recurrence and Survival in Patients Undergoing Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Analysis of 153 Patients from a Single Institution

Background  

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a cutaneous neuroendocrine neoplasm with propensity for lymphatic spread. The rarity of MCC has limited analysis of factors associated with a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and survival.     

Role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in high-risk ductal carcinoma in situ patients

BACKGROUND: The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is poorly defined. However, up to 20% of patients with DCIS will have invasive carcinoma; these patients require staging for axillary metastasis. The aim of this study was to identify patients with a core biopsy diagnosis of DCIS who may benefit from SLNB. METHODS: In a prospective study, we performed SLNB on patients with a preoperative diagnosis of >2.5 cm of high-grade DCIS or DCIS when mastectomy was indicated. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients underwent surgery for high-grade DCIS, and 35 of these patients underwent SLNB. Postsurgical excision histology revealed invasive disease in 20 patients, 19 of whom had undergone SLNB. Before the adoption of SLNB in selected DCIS patients, all 20 with occult invasive disease would have required second surgery axillary staging (P < .01, chi-square test). CONCLUSIONS: SLNB should not be performed routinely for all patients with an initial diagnosis of DCIS. However, selective lymphadenectomy may be a useful clinical adjuvant in selected high-risk DCIS patients.     

Non-sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients with metastatic sentinel nodes

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been shown to be relatively accurate in axillary nodal staging in breast cancer. In more than half of the patients with metastatic sentinel lymph node (SLN), the SLN was the only lymph node involved in the axilla. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed for those female Chinese breast cancer patients who underwent SLNB. All patients had axillary dissection after SLNB. Those patients with metastatic SLN were selected for analysis. Various tumour factors and SLN factors were analysed to study the association with residual lymph node metastasis. Results: A total of 139 SLNB was performed. The success rate of SLN localization, false negative rate and accuracy were 92%, 9% and 95%, respectively. Fifty-five patients had metastases in the SLN. In 38 patients (69%), SLN was the only lymph node involved in the axilla. Tumours <3 cm, a single metastatic SLN, presence of micro metastases and the absence of extracapsular spread in the SLN were associated with the absence of metastasis in the non-sentinel lymph nodes. Conclusion: Sentinel lymph node biopsy is accurate in the nodal staging of Chinese breast cancer patients. Several factors such as tumour <3 cm, a single metastatic SLN, micro metastases and the absence of extracapsular spread in the sentinel node(s) are useful predictors for the absence of residual disease in the axilla. With further studies and verification, these factors may prove to be important in determining which patients with metastatic SLN will require further axillary treatment. Until such information is available, axillary dissection should be performed when positive sentinel nodes are found.     

Merkel cell carcinoma: a single-centre experience

Background

For patients with merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), the status of regional lymph nodes at presentation is the single most important prognosticating tool, and the procedure is used for managing MCC patients with early stage disease identifying regional nodal micrometastasis.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted of MCC patients treated at the University Hospital of Aarhus, Denmark, between 1998 and 2013. Outcomes of interest included the time and type of first recurrence after first treatment. In 2010, our institution began using sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for MCC patients with clinically early stage disease.

Results

Thirty four patients were identified, 61.8 % of the patients presented with stage I disease, 21.5 % with stage II, 11.8 % with stage III and 5.9 % with stage IV. Thirteen patients (38.2 %) had disease recurrence, with local recurrence in three patients, regional recurrence in seven patients and distant recurrence in three patients. Median length of follow-up for all patients was 14.5 months (range 0–86). Since 2010, SLNB has been performed in seven patients; all with negative sentinel lymph nodes (SLN). Three patients had tumour located to the head and neck, three patients to the extremities and one patient to the truncus. Nodal recurrence developed in one of these patients after 5.9 months.

Conclusions

The majority of patients develop recurrence within the first 2 years after initial treatment, most representing with nodal metastasis. The introduction of SLNB may hopefully detect nodal involvement in an early stage, improving the outcome for patients with MCC. Level of Evidence: Level IV, risk/prognostic study.     

Single-Institution Experience in the Management of Patients with Clinical Stage I and II Cutaneous Melanoma: Results of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in 240 Cases

Background. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been developed as a minimally invasive technique to determine the pathologic status of regional lymph nodes in patients without clinically palpable disease and incorporated in the latest version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for cutaneous melanoma.
Objective. To analyze the results of SLNB and the prognostic value of the micrometastases and the pattern of early recurrences in patients according to sentinel lymph node (SLN) status.
Method. Patients with cutaneous melanoma in stages I and II (AJCC 2002) who underwent lymphatic mapping and SLNB from 1997 to 2003 were included in a prospective database for analysis.
Results. The rate of identification of the SLN was 100%. Micrometastases to SLN were found in 20.8% of patients. The rate of SLN micrometastases increased according to Breslow thickness and clinical stage. Breslow thickness of 0.99 mm was the optimal cutpoint for predicting the SLNB result. Twenty-four patients (12.3%) developed a locoregional or distant recurrence at a median follow-up of 31 months. Recurrences were more frequent in patients with a positive SLN. Among patients who had a recurrence, those with a positive SLN were more likely to have distant metastases than those with negative SLN. Nodal recurrences were more frequent in patients with a negative SLN compared with those with a positive SLN.
Conclusions. The status of the SLN provides accurate staging for identifying patients who may benefit from further therapy and is the most important prognostic factor of relapse-free survival.
THIS WORK WAS SUPPORTED BY GRANTS FROM FONDO DE INVESTIGACIONES SANITARIAS (98/0449), BECA DE FORMACIÓ DE PERSONAL INVESTIGADOR (2001/FI0757), AND THE RED ESPÑOLA DE CENTROS DE GENÓMICA DEL CÁNCER (C03/10).     

Sentinel lymph node dissection for primary cutaneous melanoma: a community hospital's initial experience

Management of the regional lymph nodes remains the most controversial aspect of treating patients with intermediate-thickness cutaneous melanoma. Prospective studies have failed to demonstrate a significant survival advantage for patients undergoing elective lymph node dissection. The sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) technique has been proposed as a method of accurately identifying patients with occult metastases in whom a regional lymph node dissection would be indicated. The majority of studies evaluating this technique have come from academic centers, most with dedicated melanoma clinics. This report describes the initial experience with SLND at a community hospital. Fifteen patients with intermediate-thickness primary cutaneous melanoma underwent preoperative lymphoscintigraphy with 99Tc-sulfur colloid. In addition, intraoperative lymphatic mapping using intradermally injected isosulfan blue was performed. Dissection was guided by radioactivity levels (in counts per second) as measured by a hand-held gamma probe. The resected lymph node or nodes were evaluated for micrometastases using routine hematoxylin and eosin staining and immunohistochemistry with S-100 and HMB-45. All patients were followed clinically for any evidence of recurrence. A sentinel node(s) was identified on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in all 15 patients (100%). A single sentinel node was identified in 11 of 15 (73%), two nodes in 3 (20%), and one node in 1 (6.7%). The hand-held gamma probe reading correlated well with the site marked the "hot spot" (600-15,320 cps for the hot spot versus 10-350 cps for background). The sentinel lymph node was successfully identified and resected in all 15 patients. Blue-stained lymphatics and/or lymph nodes were present in 8 of 15 (53%) cases. Histopathology was negative for evidence of occult micrometastases in all patients. At mean follow-up of 221 days, all 15 patients remain with no evidence of disease. The outcomes for mapping and harvesting the sentinel node at a community institution compare favorably with results at major academic institutions. SLND may therefore be offered to patients with intermediate-thickness cutaneous melanoma in the community hospital setting with regional lymph node dissection and adjuvant interferon alpha-2b as options for patients with nodal micrometastases.     

The use of selective lymphadenectomy in malignant blue naevus of the scalp.

Malignant blue naevus (MBN) is a rare cutaneous tumour with a close biological resemblance to malignant melanoma. MBN spreads to regional lymph nodes, creating a dilemma in managing patients with clinically negative nodal basins. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has evolved as a powerful staging tool by identifying occult metastatic nodal disease in patients with cutaneous malignancies. Here, we report a patient with MBN of the occipital scalp who underwent wide local excision together with preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative radiolymphoscintigraphy and vital dye injection to identify all draining SLNs. No occult nodal disease was identified. This report adds to the growing body of literature supporting the role of SLN biopsy in staging individuals with cutaneous malignancies, including MBN.     

Applicability of the Sentinel Node Technique to Merkel Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) resembles malignant melanoma in several ways. Both are cutaneous lesions of the same embryonic origin. Both have an unpredictable biologic behavior, early regional lymph node involvement, early distant metastases, and high recurrence rate. OBJECTIVE: To apply the sentinel node technique described for melanoma to MCC in light of the common biologic features of these two tumors. METHODS: Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, intraoperative lymphatic mapping, and sentinel node biopsy and frozen section histology were performed to guide the surgical treatment of three patients with MCC. RESULTS: Application of this approach in patients with MCC is feasible, reproducible, and seems reliable. CONCLUSION: The use of the sentinel node technique for MCC will reduce the number of unnecessary lymphadenectomies, will enable identification of microscopic metastases to lymph nodes, and will improve the stratification and accrual of patients into adjuvant treatment protocols. It may even lead to a survival benefit.     

Lymphatic mapping in patients with breast cancer and previous augmentation mammoplasty

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is now an established method of axillary staging in patients with breast cancer. However, the augmented breast poses an interesting challenge to this procedure. We hypothesized that SLNB is feasible in patients with augmented breasts who subsequently develop breast cancer. A retrospective study was performed from 1995 to 2006. Ten patients with augmented breasts underwent breast conservation therapy with SLNB. Sentinel lymph nodes were identified in all 10 patients. Three patients had positive sentinel nodes. Two patients proceeded to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), and one declined. The subsequent ALND were negative for metastatic cancer. Seven patients had negative sentinel nodes. One patient with a negative sentinel node underwent ALND with all nodes negative for metastasis. Two patients were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining eight patients, the mean duration of follow-up was 71 months. None of these patients had evidence of axillary recurrence or distant metastasis at time of last follow-up. SLNB is a feasible method of axillary node staging in patients who have undergone augmentation mammoplasty who subsequently develop breast cancer. Further studies are needed to better determine the accuracy of lymphatic mapping in this patient population.     

Is sentinel lymph node biopsy more accurate than axillary dissection for staging nodal involvement in breast cancer patients?

Today evaluation of axillary involvement can be routinely performed with the technique of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). One of the greatest advantages of SLNB is the nearly total absence of local postoperative complications. It is important to understand whether SLNB is better than axillary lymph-node dissection (ALND) for staging axillary nodal involvement. The aim of the study was to evaluate the axillary staging accuracy comparing three different methods: axillary dissection, sentinel node biopsy with the traditional 4-6 sections and sentinel node biopsy with complete analysis of the lymph node. 527 consecutive patients (525 females and 2 males) with invasive breast cancer < or = 3 cm and clinically negative axillary nodes were divided into 3 different groups: group A treated with axillary dissection, group B treated with sentinel nodal biopsy analysed with 4-6 sections, and group C treated with sentinel node biopsy with analysis of the entire node. All patients underwent a quadrantectomy to treat the tumor. Group differences and statistical significance were assessed by ANOVA. The percentages of N+ in group A and group B were 25.80% and 28% respectively, while in the third group it rose to 45%, or almost half the patients. The differences among the three groups were statistically significant (p = 0.02). From our analysis of the data it emerges that axillary dissection and sentinel node biopsy with analysis of 4-6 sections have the same accuracy in staging the nodal status of the axilla; analysis of the entire sentinel lymph node revealed an increased number of patients with axillary nodal involvement, proving more powerful in predicting nodal stage. SLNB with complete examination of the SLN removed can be considered the best method for axillary staging in breast cancer patients with clinical negative nodes. In our study, the percentage of metastases encountered after complete examination of SLN was 45% compared to the accuracy of axillary dissection that was only 25.8%. Moreover, this approach avoids the useless axillary cleaning in about 55-60% of cases, decreasing postoperative morbidity and mortality.     

Estadificación ganglionar tras terapia sistémica primaria en mujeres con cáncer de mama y afectación ganglionar al diagnóstico

ObjectiveThe main objective of this study is to analyze the efficacy of combined axillary marking (lymph node clipping and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB)) for axillary staging in patients with primary systemic treatment (PST) and pathologically confirmed node-positive breast cancer at diagnosis. The secondary objective is to determine the impact of lymph node marking in the suppression of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in the study group.MethodsWe conducted a prospective study in which lymph node staging was performed using wire localization of positive lymph nodes and a SLNB with dual tracer. All patients who presented no metastatic involvement of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) or clip/wire-marked lymph node were spared an ALND. The multidisciplinary committee agreed on axillary treatment for patients with lymph node involvement.ResultsEighty one patients met the inclusion criteria. We identified and extirpated the clip/wire-marked node in 80 of 81 patients (98.8%), with SLNB performed successfully in 88,9% of patients. The SLN and wire-marked node matched in 78.9% of patients; 76.2% of patients did not undergo ALND.ConclusionsThe combined axillary marking (clip and SLNB) in patients with metastatic lymph node at diagnosis and PST offers a high identification rate (98.8%%) and a high correlation between the wire-marked lymph node and the SLN (78.9%%). This procedure has enabled the suppression of ALND in 76.2% of patients.     

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review of the English Literature

BACKGROUND: Although most cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is curable by a variety of treatment modalities, a small subset of tumors recur, metastasize, and result in death. Although risk factors for metastasis have been described, there are little data available on appropriate workup and staging of patients with high-risk SCC. OBJECTIVE: We reviewed reported cases and case series of SCC in which sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) was performed to determine whether further research is warranted in developing SLNB as a staging tool for patients with high-risk SCC. METHODS: The English medical literature was reviewed for reports of SLNB in patients with cutaneous SCC. Data from anogenital and nonanogenital cases were collected and analyzed separately. The percentage of cases with a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) was calculated. False negative and nondetection rates were tabulated. Rates of local recurrence, nodal and distant metastasis, and disease-specific death were reported. RESULTS: A total of 607 patients with anogenital SCC and 85 patients with nonanogenital SCC were included in the analysis. A SLN could not be identified in 3% of anogenital and 4% of nonanogenital cases. SLNB was positive in 24% of anogenital and 21% of nonanogenital patients. False-negative rates as determined by completion lymphadenectomy were 4% (8/213) and 5% (1/20), respectively. Most false-negative results were reported in studies from 2000 or earlier in which the combination of radioisotope and blue dye was not used in the SLN localization process. Complications were reported rarely and were limited to hematoma, seroma, cutaneous lymphatic fistula, wound infection, and dehiscence. CONCLUSIONS: Owing to the lack of controlled studies, it is premature to draw conclusions regarding the utility of SLNB in SCC. The available data, however, suggest that SLNB accurately diagnoses subclinical lymph node metastasis with few false-negative results and low morbidity. Controlled studies are needed to demonstrate whether early detection of subclinical nodal metastasis will lead to improved disease-free or overall survival for patients with high-risk SCC.