Basic research supported developments of chemotherapy in nonresectable isolated colorectal liver metastases to a protocol of hepatic artery infusion using mitoxantrone, 5-FU + folinic acid and mitomycin C

OBJECTIVE: Since the developments in systemic chemotherapy of metastasized colorectal cancer have not resulted in substantial gains in survival times, we wished to improve the course of isolated nonresectable colorectal liver metastases (CPLM) by hepatic arterial infusion treatment. BACKGROUND: Patients (pts) with CRLM have a worse fate than those pts whose liver metastases could be resected. Systemic (i.v.) chemotherapy for CRLM/colorectal metastases does not improve survival to a relevant level (median survival time (med. surv.) after 5-Fluorouracil + Folinic Acid (5-FU + FA) i.v.: 6.4-14.3 months (m)). Hepatic artery infusion (HAI) with 5-Fluorode-oxyuridine (5-FUDR) has been demonstrated in a metaanalysis of randomized trials to be superior to i.v. treatment/palliative care (med. surv.: 15 vs. 10 m). The benefit of HAI with 5-FUDR, although recommended as treatment for CRLM, is severely compromised by the 5-FUDR induced hepatotoxicity, leading eventually to sclerosing cholangitis (SC)/liver scirrhosis. We have stepwise developed a protocol for HAI of CRLM, which is superior to HAI with 5-FUDR, and, most evidently, to systemic chemotherapy. PATIENTS/METHODS: Between 1982-1997, 222 CR (L) M patients were treated within subsequent protocols (Table). In protocol A, 68 CRLM pts received HAI with 5-FUDR (A1: nonrandomized pts; A2: randomized pts). In protocol B (randomized pts.), 46 pts received 5-FUDR i.a. (via HAI) + i.v. In protocol C, systemic chemotherapy with 5-FU + FA was conducted in 34 pts with metastasized colorectal cancers, including CRLM. In protocol D 5-FU + FA was delivered via HAI in 25 pts with CRLM. In protocol E, based on in vitro phase II studies and the results of protocol D, Mitoxantrone and Mitomycin C were added to 5-FU + FA (MFFM). Fifty (50) CRLM pts received HAI with MFFM. RESULTS: The response rates, med. surv. times, systemic toxicity and SC rates are shown in the table. HAI with MFFM produced objective responses in 66%, the med. surv. was 27.4 m, and no SC occurred. The ports surgically placed for HAI, e.g., in protocols D and E, functioned in 90%, 82%, and 76% 6, 9, and 11 m after start of the HAI. Quality of life in protocol E was high. Nine pts from protocols D + E with either partial (PR, 7 pts) or complete (CR, 2 pts) remissions received a secondary liver resection without hospital mortality, and 7/9 pts are living 2-58 m after liver resection, 2/9 pts died 11 and 22 m after resection. [table: see text] SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS: Our learning curve to achieve optimal treatment of CRLM resulted in a protocol using HAI with MFFM. The results of this protocol (E) including the high remission rate, long median survival time, good port function, high quality of life, and, most interestingly, the possibility to downstage and resect primarily nonresectable metastases, seem to be superior to HAI with 5-FUDR of 5-FU + FA and to systemic chemotherapy with 5-FU + FA. This hypothesis is currently examined in a phase III study (HAI with MFFM vs. 5-FU + FA i.v.).     

Regional chemotherapy of nonresectable colorectal liver metastases with mitoxantrone, 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid, and mitomycin C may prolong survival.

BACKGROUND: Regional chemotherapy of isolated, nonresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) by hepatic artery infusion (HAI) has the advantages of high response rates and the possibility of downstaging and resection of CRLMs. 5-Fluorodeoxyuridine (5-FUDR) has been the drug studied in most Phase II and III trials. The meta-analysis of the Phase III trials comparing HAI with systemic or supportive therapy confirmed an advantage for response and even survival for HAI. Hepatic artery infusion with 5-FUDR, however, is hepatotoxic, inducing sclerosing cholangitis (SC). The authors have introduced 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with folinic acid for HAI and found equal effectivity but no SC when compared with HAI with 5-FUDR. Now, they report a new combination chemotherapy protocol based on HAI with 5-FU with FA and on in vitro Phase II studies suggesting mitoxantrone and mitomycin C as active drugs for HAI in CRLM. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between February 1993 and August 2000, 63 patients with CRLM were treated with HAI using mitoxantrone, 5-FU with FA, and mitomycin C (MFFM) via port catheters with a protocol planing up to 11 cycles of treatment. Toxicity and response were analyzed according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria, and survival was analyzed according to Kaplan-Meier. All patients were treated with more than two HAI cycles. RESULTS: The objective response rate (complete remission and partial remission) was 54% and primary intrahepatic progression (progressive disease) occurred in 4.8%, whereas in 41.3% of the patients the intrahepatic disease was evaluated as no change. Median survival times from the first diagnosis of CRLM or start of HAI were 25.7 months and 23.7 months, respectively, and 7 patients lived longer than 40 months. Grade 3 toxicity according to WHO occurred in 34.9%, and Grade 4 occurred in 3.2%. No toxic death or SC occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Our new HAI protocol with MFFM seems to be superior to HAI with 5-FUDR, 5-FU with FA, and systemic chemotherapy with 5-FU and FA at acceptable toxicity. Currently, HAI with MFFM is compared with systemic chemotherapy using 5-FU and FA intravenously in a randomized Phase III trial.     

Multimodal therapy with intravenous biweekly leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan combined with hepatic arterial infusion pirarubicin in non-resectable hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer (a European Association for Research in Oncology trial).

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the tolerance and efficacy of combining i.v. irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) with hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of pirarubicin in non-resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients were included in a phase II trial with i.v. irinotecan/5-FU/LV administered every 2 weeks, combined with HAI pirarubicin 60 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 4 weeks. In most cases HAI was administered via a percutaneous catheter. RESULTS: The main grade 3/4 toxicity was neutropenia, encountered in 78% of the patients. When all patients were considered in the analysis, tumour response rate was 15 out of 31 [48%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 32% to 65%]. Liver resection was made possible in 11 patients (35%; 95% CI 21% to 53%). There were no toxic death. Median overall survival was 20.5 months, and median progression-free survival was 9.1 months. In patients with completely resected metastases, median overall survival was not reached and median progression-free survival was 20.2 months. CONCLUSION: The multimodality approach used in the present study was well-tolerated and yielded dramatic responses. An aggressive approach combining i.v. and HAI chemotherapy deserves further investigation.     

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with oxaliplatin in unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer after systemic chemotherapy failure

We report 5 cases of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) with hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) oxaliplatin after systemic infusion chemotherapy failure. Patients with unresectable CRLM and history of systemic chemotherapy failure were treated with HAI oxaliplatin (L-OHP 100 mg/body, 2 hours) combined with intravenous (iv) levofolinate calcium (175 mg/body, 2 hours) and iv bolus 5-FU (500 mg/body) every 2 weeks. RESULT: An average age was 58 years. All patients had previously received FOLFOX. Lung metastases had already existence before HAI oxaliplatin in 4 patients. A median of 10 treatments were administered (range 5-14). Serum level of CEA was decreased in 4 cases. In 2 patients, lung metastasis developed while a PR was obtained in the liver metastasis. Progress disease (PD) was confirmed in other 3 patients. No major toxicity was presented. The median time to progression free survival was 3.0 months and the median overall survival was 7.1 months. CONCLUSION: HAI oxaliplatin might be beneficial as a salvage therapy for CRLM without extrahepatic metastasis, which demonstrated an acceptable tolerability and maintenance of QOL.     

Neoadjuvant treatment of unresectable liver disease with irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil plus folinic acid in colorectal cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to observe the effects of neoadjuvant therapy with irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid (FA) on the resection rate and survival of colorectal cancer patients with initially unresectable hepatic metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy comprising irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) administered intravenously (i.v.) on day 1, FA 200 mg/m(2) i.v. on days 1 and 2, 5-FU 400 mg/m(2) i.v. bolus on days 1 and 2, and 5-FU 1200 mg/m(2) as a continuous 48-h i.v. infusion on day 1. The treatment was repeated every 2 weeks and response was assessed every 12 weeks (six cycles). RESULTS: The objective response rate to chemotherapy was 47.5% (n = 19), with two complete responses and disease stabilization in 11 (27.5.%) patients. Responses were unconfirmed for 11 patients undergoing surgery within 2 weeks. Treatment was well tolerated and adverse events were typical of the chemotherapy agents used. Twenty-seven (67.5%) patients reported hematological toxicity (35.0% grade 3/4) and 14 (35.0%) reported gastrointestinal toxicity (12.5% grade 3/4). Thirteen patients (32.5%) underwent potentially curative liver resection following chemotherapy. Chemotherapy was particularly effective in patients with large metastases on entry to the study. The median time to progression is 14.3 months and, at a median follow-up of 19 months, all patients are alive. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant therapy with irinotecan combined with 5-FU/FA enabled a significant proportion of patients with initially unresectable liver metastases to undergo surgical resection. The effects of treatment on survival have yet to be determined.     

Results of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with 5-FU and leucovorin for unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer

PURPOSE: Hepaticarterial infusional(HAI)5-FU chemotherapy, which involves the use of interventional radiology technique, has matured technically in Japan in the 1990's. The antitumor effect of 5-FU is enhanced by combination with leucovorin. This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of HAI 5-FU and leucovorin chemotherapy for patients with unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer. METHODS: Treatment was given to 20 patients with unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer. The chemotherapy regimen consisted of weekly HAI of 5-FU(1,000 mg/body)and leucovorin(250 mg/body)over five hours. The survival and response rates to the therapy were assessed according to RECIST. Hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity was assessed according to CTCAE v3.0. RESULTS: Combined HAI 5-FU and leucovorin therapy was carried out an average of 27 times. The response rate for liver tumors was 75%, and the median survival time was 22 months. The applied regimen caused only mild adverse events. There was no evidence of myelosuppression except for platelet decrease(grade 3)in a patient with chronic renal failure. CONCLUSION: This HAI approach using 5-FU and leucovorin was effective and the therapy for unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer was tolerated well. Therefore the HAI approach should be reconsidered as an effective therapy against this disease in Japan.     

Percutaneous ethanol injection therapy with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for liver metastases from gastric cancer

Ten patients with liver metastases from advanced gastric cancer received percutaneous ethanol injection therapy (PEI) and chemotherapy by hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) via implantable reservoir. A 90% ethanol solution including 10%. Lipiodol was injected in the liver as PEI.5-FU, EPIR and MMC were used as the regimen for HAI chemotherapy. We have performed this therapy (PEI + HAI) for ten patients with liver metastases since February, 1997. These patients have received this therapy for 4-36 months and three patients died within 16 months. However, three patients did not develop any liver failure after this therapy. The median survival rate was 25.2 months. There are statistically significant differences between upto ss and over se of invasion, and between INF alpha and gamma (p = 0.005).     

Hepatic arterial infusion of low-dose leucovorin/5-FU chemotherapy for unresectable hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer

Hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) chemotherapy for unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC) is generally indicated to patients without extrahepatic lesions. This study was performed to examine whether or not it was possible to obtain a comparable survival time, response rate (RR) and modest toxicity combining low-dose LV and 5-FU (LV/5-FU) with HAI for the patients with unresectable liver metastases from CRC. Twenty two patients with unresectable multiple liver metastases were enrolled in the study. These were patients who had been admitted from 1994 to 2003 in our hospital. Patients were given LV at 25 mg/body immediately followed by 5-FU at 500 mg/body as a 2-hour HAI daily for 5 consecutive days every 5 weeks. The median survival time (MST) of HAI patients was 24.5 months. According to the treatment in the HAI patients, one patient was CR, 6 were PR, 9 were NC, 6 were PD, and the response rate (RR) was 31.8% (7 of 22 patients). The toxicities to this regimen on HAI were observed in 12 patients, and grades 3 or 4 were in 3 patients only. These results suggested that HAI with LV/5-FU can be useful for unresectable liver metastases from CRC.     

A case of liver and lung metastases of rectal cancer responding well to 5-FU hepato-arterial infusion (HAI) with combined use of oral UFT

We have studied the pharmacokinetics of 5-FU hepato-arterial infusion (HAI) with combined use of oral UFT for colorectal cancer cases previously. The plasma 5-FU concentration in cases of 5-FU HAI plus UFT is 1.5-6 times as high as with 5-FU HAI only. We report a rectal cancer case with liver and lung metastases treated successfully with this protocol. A 75-year-male underwent low anterior resection for rectal cancer as Rab, 3.5 x 3 cm, well, ai, n2, P0, H3, M1 on March 26, 2002. For synchronous hepatic and lung metastases, he received weekly 5-FU 1,000 mg HAI, UFT 4T 2 x postoperatively. As a result, liver and lung metastases disappeared over 6 months. We recommend weekly 5-FU HAI with combined use of UFT, which can be more effective not only for liver metastases but also for extra-hepatic lesion of colorectal cancer.     

Hepatic arterial injection therapy (HAI) for metastatic liver tumor from gastric cancer

The results and problems of hepatic artery infusion therapy (HAI) for gastric carcinoma with synchronous liver metastasis were evaluated. The response rate of HAI with CDDP and 5-FU for metastatic liver tumor was 55% (1 CR + 5 PR/11). The median survival time for responders was 16.5 months, which was statistically longer than that of non-responders at only 5.5 months. Histologically, most responder cases were with AFP producing tumors and NSE positive tumors without distant lymph node involvement. Non-responder cases developed marked distant lymph node involvement besides the liver metastasis. Most of responder patients died of lymph node recurrence or distant metastasis other than liver tumor. It may be concluded that additional therapy to HAI is needed to improve the prognosis of gastric cancer patients with multiple liver metastases.     

Weekly regimen of 5-FU vs 5-FU + intermediate dose folinic acid in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.

Sixty-four patients with advanced colorectal cancer were randomized to receive 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) at the dose of 600 mg/sm weekly or the same regimen of 5-FU administered halfway through a 1 hour i.v. infusion of folinic acid (FA) at the dose of 200 mg/sm. A partial remission (PR) was obtained in 1/30 patients (3%) treated with 5-FU and in 9/34 patients (26%) treated with 5-FU + FA (P = 0.028). The objective response was accompanied by an improvement in subjective status and general conditions. The median duration of PR in 5-FU + FA arm was 10 months (range: 6-17). The median time to progression was 5 and 6 months in patients treated with 5FU and 5FU + FA, respectively (not a statistically significant difference). There were no cases of grade 4 toxicity. A higher, but not statistically significant, incidence and intensity of diarrhoea was observed in the 5-FU + FA arm. However, 14 patients on 5-FU + FA as opposed to 3 on 5-FU had to stop the treatment temporarily because of side-effects (P = 0.011). Median survival was higher with 5-FU + FA treatment (10 vs 7 months), but the difference is not statistically significant. This study confirms that the addition of an intermediate dose of FA enhances the cytotoxicity of 5-FU. Although its clinical advantage was limited, this weekly 5-FU + FA regimen appears useful in the treatment of advanced colo-rectal cancer on a outpatient basis.     

Biochemical modulation of fluorouracil: comparison of methotrexate,folinic acid,and fluorouracil versus folinic acid and fluorouracil in advanced colorectal cancer: a randomized trial

 Recent advances in biochemical pharmacology have revealed the basis for the biological modulation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by methotrexate (MTX) and folinic acid (FA). Sequential use of MTX given 24 h prior to 5-FU has resulted in enhanced cell kill in vitro and in vivo. In addition, administration of FA prior to 5-FU has led to potentiation of 5-FU action by stabilization of the ternary complex of thymidine synthase. In the present randomized study, two groups of patients with advanced colorectal cancer were treated as follows: 43 patients (pts) in group A received 5-FU + FA, whereas 45 pts in group B received 5-FU + FA + MTX. The dosage was as follows: group A received FA i. v. at 300 mg/m² per day, prior to i. v. 5-FU at 500 mg/m² per day on days 1 – 4; group B was given MTX i. v. at 130 mg/m² per day on day 0, followed 24 h later by FA at 15 mg q6h × 6, and 5-FU + FA was started on day 1 and given at the same doses and schedule described for group A. Objective responses were achieved by 8/43 pts in group A (1 complete response and 7 partial responses) and by 18/45 pts in group B (3 complete and 15 partial responses), all occurring in the liver. There was no significant difference in the median time to progression (group A 6.1 months, group B 6.8 months) or the median survival (group A 9.2 months, group B 10.3 months). Toxicity was significantly greater in group B [grade 2 – 3 mucositis 20% versus only 2% in group A (P <0.0001); grade 3 diarrhea in group B 15% versus 3% in group A (P <0.001)]. According to our results, double biological modulation of 5-FU with MTX + FA led to an enhanced response rate with increased toxicity as compared with the 5-FU + FA regimen given at less than its maximally tolerated dose. Received: 8 May 1995 / Accepted: 25 January 1996     

Randomized, multicenter trial of fluorouracil plus leucovorin administered either via hepatic arterial or intravenous infusion versus fluorodeoxyuridine administered via hepatic arterial infusion in patients with nonresectable liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of three treatments for patients with documented adenocarcinoma of the colon and/or rectum who have undergone complete resection of primary tumor and have nonresectable liver metastases that do not exceed 75% of the liver volume. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 168 patients at 25 treatment centers were enrolled onto this prospective, multicenter, randomized study. The three treatment arms were as follows: (1) fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) administered via hepatic arterial infusion (HAI), (2) 5-FU/LV administered via intravenous (IV) infusion, and (3) fluorodeoxyuridine (FUDR) administered via HAI. RESULTS: Median times to disease progression for the three treatment arms were as follows: 9.2 months for patients treated with HAI 5-FU/LV, 6.6 months for IV 5-FU/LV, and 5.9 months for HAI FUDR. Median survival times for patients treated with HAI 5-FU/LV, IV 5-FU/LV, and HAI FUDR were 18.7 months, 17.6 months, and 12.7 months, respectively. There was a nearly two-fold increase in time to progression in addition to a survival benefit among patients with an intrahepatic tumor burden of less than 25% who were treated with HAI 5-FU/LV. The most common adverse events were stomatitis, nausea and vomiting, skin irritation, diarrhea, and elevated serum levels of liver enzymes. Some patients exhibited severe reactions, including biliary sclerosis and chemical hepatitis. CONCLUSION: Although the use of HAI 5-FU/LV as a means of treating liver metastases after resection of colorectal carcinoma warrants further investigation, it cannot be recommended as a routine therapeutic measure at this time.     

5-FU pharmacokinetic study of 5-FU hepato-arterial infusion with oral UFT

5-FU hepato-arterial infusion (HAI) is powerful chemotherapy for liver metastases of colorectal cancers. Event though hepatic lesions are controlled by 5-FU HAI, we have found that extra-hepatic lesions are the limiting factor for colorectal cancer patients. General chemotherapy is necessary in addition to 5-FU HAI. The chemotherapy of 5-FU venous infusion plus oral UFT is called "pharmacokinetic modulating chemotherapy (PMC)." This protocol is very effective for colorectal cancers, because UFT reduces the rate of metabolism of infused 5-FU. We studied the plasma 5-FU concentration at the time of weekly high dose 5-FU HAI plus oral UFT. The plasma concentration of 5-FU in 5-FU HAI plus UFT is 1.5-6 times as high as with 5-FU HAI only. 5-FU concentration in the liver tissue is likely to be much higher at the time of 5-FU HAI. 5-FU HAI plus oral UFT can be more effective for not only liver metastases but also for extra-hepatic lesions than 5-FU HAI alone.     

Relevance of immunological parameters in progression of colorectal-carcinoma

The long-term influence on the immunological stage from surgery and/or adjuvant or palliative therapy of 23 patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma was investigated by performing regular phenotyping and functional analysis of peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL). The following groups were chosen: A (n=6); patients after resection of primary tumor and liver-metastases without chemotherapy. B (n=3); patients with catheter implantation after resection of primary tumor and liver metastases receiving an adjuvant arterial chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (5-formyltetrahydrofolic acid, FA). C (n=7); patients with non-resectable liver-metastases, receiving arterial or systemic chemotherapy after catheter implantation. D (n=7); patients with extrahepatic filiae receiving systemic palliative chemotherapy. Lymphocytes of 10 healthy volunteers served as controls. Furthermore, we were able to show effects of 5-FU and FA on the immune system.     

Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) oncogene mutation predicts magnitude of response and outcomes in hepatic arterial infusion pump therapy of unresectable colorectal liver metastases

BackgroundThe Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) mutation predicts negative outcomes following resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) and adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) pump chemotherapy. Less is known on the effects of KRAS mutation on tumor response in patients with unresectable CRLM undergoing HAI chemotherapy with floxuridine.MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study investigating the effects of KRAS mutation on tumor response in patients with unresectable CRLM treated with HAI chemotherapy. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), secondary endpoints included overall tumor response and conversion to resectability.ResultsTwenty-five patients with unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer were treated with HAI chemotherapy between 2017–2019. Median number of liver lesions was 12 (range, 1–59) and almost all (n=24) had prior chemotherapy before starting HAI therapy. Median number of cycles administered via HAI pump was 6 (range, 3–12). Overall decrease in liver tumor burden was 63.5% (median; range, −257–100%) with an ORR of 20/25 (80%) and 10 (40%) patients converting to resectable status. Eleven (44%) patients had KRAS positive tumors. When compared to wild-type, KRAS positive tumors had less overall percent decrease (58% vs. 70%; P=0.04) and ORR (7/11 vs. 13/13; P=0.03). Fewer patients with KRAS positive tumors converted to resectable status during HAI therapy (2/11 vs. 8/13; P=0.05). At a median follow-up of 14.6 months (range, 4.0–36.6 months), overall survival is 45% among KRAS-positive and 77% for wild type patients.ConclusionsKRAS mutational status in patients with unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer predicts worse response to HAI chemotherapy compared to wild type.     

Palliative second-line treatment with weekly high-dose 5-fluorouracil as 24-hour infusion and folinic acid (AIO) plus oxaliplatin after pre-treatment with the AIO-regimen in colorectal cancer (CRC)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The aim of this work was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of second-line treatment with weekly high-dose 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) as a 24-hour infusion (24-h inf.) and folinic acid (FA) (AIO-regimen) plus Oxaliplatin (L-OHP) after pre-treatment with the AIO regimen, focusing in particular on the efficacy of palliative first- and second-line treatment in colorectal carcinoma (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with non-resectable distant CRC metastases were enrolled in a prospective phase II study for palliative second-line treatment after previous palliative first-line treatment in accordance with the AIO regimen. On an outpatient basis, the patients received a treatment regimen comprising biweekly 85 mg/m2 L-OHP in the form of a 2-hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion and 500 mg/m2 FA as a 1 to 2-hour i.v. infusion, followed by 2,600 mg/m2 5-FU administered as a 24-h inf. i.v. once weekly. A single treatment cycle comprised 6 weekly infusions followed by 2 weeks of rest. RESULTS: During second-line treatment, a total of 26 patients received 340 chemotherapy applications. As the main symptom of toxicity, diarrhoea (NCI-CTC toxicity grade 3+4) presented in 5 patients (19%; 95% CI: 4-34), followed by nausea (CTC grade 3) in one patient (4%; 95% CI: 0-11). Twenty-three patients were evaluable for treatment response. The remission data can be summarised as follows: Complete remission (CR): n=1 (4%; 95% CI: 0-13); partial remission (PR): n=3 (13%; 95% CI: 0-27); stable disease (SD): n=11 (48%; 95% CI: 27-68) and progressive disease (PD): n=8 (35%; 95% CI: 15-54). The median progression-free survival (PFS) rate (n=26) was 3.3 months (range 0-11.5), the median survival time counted from the start of second-line treatment (n=26) 11.6 months (range 2.1-33.0) and the median survival time counted from the start of first-line treatment (n=26) 19.9 months (range 7.7-49.8). CONCLUSION: Palliative second-line treatment according to the AIO regimen plus L-OHP is feasible in an outpatient setting and well tolerated by the patients. Tumour control (CR + PR + SD) was achieved in 65% of the patients, the median survival time being 11.6 months. The AIO regimen followed by the 'AIO regimen plus L-OHP' therapy sequence led to a promising median survival time of 19.9 months (range 7.7-49.8).     

Folinic acid + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) versus equidose 5-FU in advanced colorectal cancer. Phase III study of 'GISCAD' (Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer).

In a multicentre Phase III trial, 182 patients were randomized to either folinic acid (FA) (200 mg/sqm i.v. x 5 days) + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (400 mg/sqm i.v. in 15' x 5 days) every 4 weeks (Arm A), or to 5-FU alone at the same dosage (Arm B). Response rates were 20.6% (Arm A) and 10% (Arm B) with a significant (p = 0.046) advantage for FA + 5-FU. Median time to progression (6 and 6 months) and overall survival (11.5 and 11 months) were similar in the 2 groups of patients, while neither treatment was effective in reducing pain or improving performance status. Univariate analysis showed that no prognostic factors other than treatment influenced response, although survival was affected by the number and site of metastases, performance status, and the presence and degree of pain. Toxicity was acceptable and lower in comparison with other Phase II-III trials, with no significant difference between the 2 arms. However, in individual patients, grade 3-4 side effects (mainly stomatitis and diarrhoea) were observed, particularly in patients receiving FA: this led to interruption of the treatment in 7 cases. The superiority, in terms of objective response, of FA + 5-FU over 5-FU alone would seem to justify a large-scale evaluation of this combination in the adjuvant setting. Further improvements in relation to advanced disease (i.e., modifications to the schedule and/or introduction of other modulators) are warranted.     

A comparison between hepatic artery ligation and portal 5-Fu infusion versus 5-Fu intra arterial infusion for colorectal liver metastases.

AIM: A prospective randomized study was executed comparing two regimens of regional therapy for liver metastases from colorectal cancer. METHODS: Eighteen patients were allocated to hepatic artery occlusion for 16 h followed by intraportal 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu) infusion (1000 mg/m(2)) for 5 days every sixth week (HAO). Twenty-one patients received intra-arterial 5-Fu infusion+Leucovorin (100 mg) i.v. for 2 days every second week (HAI). The follow up every third month included CT and CEA. Thirteen patients had limited extrahepatic cancer. At tumor progression regional therapy was stopped and systemic chemotherapy or the best supportive care was administered. RESULTS: The study was discontinued after randomization of 39 patients. No significant difference in survival within patients with and without extrahepatic cancer was present. The mean survival was longer in the HAI group than for the HAO group (19 months versus 13 months, p=0.0147) (median 18 (8-37) versus 12 (2-26). PR and SD were registered in 8/18 in the HAO group and 17/21 patients in HAI group. The median time to progress was 4 (1-22) months versus 7 (1-23) months for the HAO and HAI group, respectively. CONCLUSION: Regional intraarterial infusion with 5-Fu gives significantly better survival than hepatic artery occlusion followed by portal infusion. A limited amount of extrahepatic cancer does not influence survival time. A trial comparing hepatic artery 5-FU infusion and Leucovorin versus the most effective systemic therapy is warranted.     

Leucovorin and fluorouracil vs levamisole and fluorouracil as adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of 6-month therapy with leucovorin (LV) + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) vs 12 months of therapy with levamisole (LVZ) + 5-FU, as adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected Dukes' stage B2 or C rectal cancer. One hundred and fifty patients with surgically resected rectal carcinoma, were enrolled in the present study; Dukes' stage B2 (n=70) or C (n=80), were randomly assigned to chemotherapy with 5-FU + LV x 6 months or 5-FU + LVZ x 12 months. Patient characteristics were equally balanced between the examined groups. Adjuvant CT consisted of LV 20 mg/m(2) intravenously (i.v.) plus 5-FU 450 mg/m(2) i.v., on days 1-5 every 4 weeks for 6 cycles or 5-FU 450 mg/m(2) i.v. every week plus LVZ 50 mg t.i.d x 3 days for 1 year. All patients received radiotherapy with a three-field technique to a total dose of 45 Gy, over 5 weeks. After a median follow-up of 7.4 years there were no significant differences between the two treatment groups with respect to the recurrence rates (P=0.821). Moreover, there was no difference in disease-free survival for patients stage Dukes' B2 (log-rank p=0.73); median for LV group 90 (8-131) months, and for LVZ group 86.5 (3-129) months. No difference was noted in disease-free survival for patients stage Dukes' C (log-rank p=0.73); median for LV group 60 (17-128) months, and for LVZ group 64 (2-123) months. There was no difference in overall survival for patients stage Dukes' B2 (log-rank p=0.75); median for LV group 90 (22-131) months, and for LVZ group 86 (10-129) months. For stage Dukes' C (log-rank p=0.73); median for LV group 67 (17-128) months, and for LVZ group 64 (5-123) months. Toxicities were as follows in the 5-FU + LVZ vs 5-FU + LV group; myelosuppression (leucopenia grade 3, 12% vs 4%, p<0.04), diarrhea (grade 0, 60% vs 76%, p<0.02), and liver toxicity (increase of transaminases >3-fold, 12 patients vs 2, p<0.03), were more frequent in LVZ group. None of the patients stopped chemotherapy because of the toxicity, and there were no toxicity-related deaths. In conclusion, adjuvant chemotherapy in RC with LV + 5-FU for 6 months is equally effective and less toxic than LVZ + 5-FU for 12 months.