Efficacy and safety of CHG regimen (low-dose cytarabine,homoharringtonine with G-CSF priming) as induction chemotherapy for elderly patients with high-risk MDS or AML transformed from MDS

Background  

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of CHG regimen (low-dose cytarabine, homoharringtonine with G-CSF priming) as an induction chemotherapy for elderly patients with high-risk MDS or acute myeloid leukemia transformed from MDS (MDS–AML).     

Comparative analysis of remission induction therapy for high-risk MDS and AML progressed from MDS in the MDS200 study of Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group

A total of 120 patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and AML progressed from MDS (MDS–AML) were registered in a randomized controlled study of the Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group (JALSG). Untreated adult patients with high-risk MDS and MDS–AML were randomly assigned to receive either idarubicin and cytosine arabinoside (IDR/Ara-C) (Group A) or low-dose cytosine arabinoside and aclarubicin (CA) (Group B). The remission rates were 64.7% for Group A (33 of 51 evaluable cases) and 43.9% for Group B (29 out of 66 evaluable cases). The 2-year overall survival rates and disease-free survival rates were 28.1 and 26.0% for Group A, and 32.1 and 24.8% for Group B, respectively. The duration of CR was 320.6 days for Group A and 378.7 days for Group B. There were 15 patients who lived longer than 1,000 days after diagnosis: 6 and 9 patients in Groups A and B, respectively. However, among patients enrolled in this trial, intensive chemotherapy did not produce better survival than low-dose chemotherapy. In conclusion, it is necessary to introduce the first line therapy excluding the chemotherapy that can prolong survival in patients with high-risk MDS and MDS–AML.     

Sequence of administration and methylation of SOCS3 may govern response to gemtuzumab ozogamicin in combination with conventional chemotherapy in patients with refractory or relapsed acute myelogenous leukemia (AML)

In older patients suffering from acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), aggressive chemotherapy is accompanied with high treatment‐related morbidity and mortality. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO), a humanized monoclonal anti‐CD33 antibody, represents a well tolerated treatment option, but optimal treatment schedules are still unknown. Additionally, Suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (SOCS3) inhibits the CD33‐induced block on cytokine‐induced proliferation. Consequently, a variable response of AML cells to anti‐CD33‐targeted therapy may be caused by modulation of SOCS3 expression. Twenty‐four patients with refractory or relapsed CD33‐positive AML received GO as a single agent before or after conventional chemotherapy. The methylation status of the SOCS3 CpG island was assessed by methylation‐specific polymerase chain reaction. Response (RR) and overall survival (OS) were significantly higher in 16 patients receiving chemotherapy before GO (RR 81%, OS 14.8 months) compared to three patients who received GO single agent therapy (RR 33%, OS 7.2 months) or 16 with GO before chemotherapy (RR 0% OS 2.2 months, P = 0.01 for RR and P < 0.001 for OS). Methylation of the SOCS3 CpG island was found in 8/24 patients. There was a trend towards a higher RR and longer OS in patients with SOCS3 hypermethylation (RR 86%, OS 25.1 months) compared to unmethylated SOCS3 (RR 56%, OS 10.3 months, P = 0.09). Administration of GO a few days after chemotherapy seems to provide better response and survival compared to administration of GO directly before chemotherapy. The potential role of SOCS3 hypermethylation as a biomarker should be further investigated in patients undergoing GO containing therapies. Am. J. Hematol., 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Phase 1 trial of gemtuzumab ozogamicin in combination with enocitabine and daunorubicin for elderly patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia: Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group (JALSG)-GML208 study

We conducted a phase 1 study of a combination of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) plus conventional chemotherapy in elderly patients (??65?years old) with relapsed or refractory CD33-positive acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Patients received a standard dose of enocitabine (200?mg/m2?×?8?days) and daunorubicin (30?mg/m2?×?days 1?C3) plus an escalating dose of GO (1.5?C5?mg/m2 on day 4). The dose escalation of GO was done according to a standard 3?+?3 design following a modified Fibonacci sequence. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed in three patients (median age, 71) at level 1 (1.5?mg/m2) or in three patients (median age, 73) at level 2 (3?mg/m2). Neither veno-occlusive diseases nor sinusoidal obstructive syndromes were noted at either level. However, as GO was withdrawn from the US market in June 2010, based on a randomized study in newly diagnosed AML, we decided not to proceed to the level 3 (5?mg/m2) in order to avoid possibly more severe adverse effects, and also because all six patients experienced grade 4 myelosuppression, with complete remission in three. This study showed that 3?mg/m2 of GO in combination with enocitabine and daunorubicin may be a recommendable dose for a phase 2 study in Japanese elderly patients with CD33-positive AML. The study was registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/) as UMIN000002603.     

Idarubicin, cytarabine, and topotecan in patients with refractory or relapsed acute myelogenous leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome.

In an effort to develop more effective therapy for patients with refractory or relapsed acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), we investigated the efficacy of a combination chemotherapy consisting of idarubicin, cytarabine, and topotecan. Twenty-seven patients were treated: four with primary refractory AML, nine with AML in first relapse, four with AML in second relapse, and 10 with MDS-RAEB/RAEBT. Patients received as salvage therapy a single course of idarubicin 12 mg/m(2) IV bolus on days 1-3, cytarabine 1 g/m(2) over two hours q 12 hr on days 1-5, and topotecan 1.25 mg/m(2) over 24 hr on days 1-5. Median age was 42 years (range 17-65 years). All patients were evaluable for response: 14 (51.9%) achieved complete remission, 10 with AML (59%) and four with MDS (40%), respectively. Thirteen AML patients (excluding four relapsed after autologous stem cell transplantation) were grouped into four categories to stratify the probability of achieving complete remission (CR): group 1, first CR duration > or = 2 years and receiving first salvage treatment (S1); group 2, first CR duration 1-2 years and receiving S1; group 3, first CR duration 0-1 years and receiving S1; and group 4, first CR duration 0-1 years and receiving S2, S3, or S4 after failing S1. The response rate of each group was as follows: group 1, one of two (50%); group 2, one of one (100%); group 3, four of four (100%); group 4, two of six (33.3%). The median remission duration and survival of patients with AML were six and 12 months, respectively. Median duration of survival in 10 MDS patients was 15 months, and all four MDS patients achieving a CR maintained continuous CR with a median follow-up of 11 months. Severe myelosuppression was observed in all patients, resulting in fever or documented infections in 89% of patients. Median time to recovery of neutrophils > or =0.5 x 10(9)/l was 22 days (11-34) and for platelets > 20 x 10(9)/l 35 days (11-58). Reversible grade 3-4 toxicities included diarrhea (two patients) and mucositis (seven patients). We conclude that combination chemotherapy with intermediate dose cytarabine, idarubicin, and topotecan has significant antileukemic activity and acceptable toxicity in salvage AML and high-risk MDS.     

Low-dose cytarabine and aclarubicin in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (CAG regimen) for previously treated patients with relapsed or primary resistant acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and previously untreated elderly patients with AML, secondary AML, and refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation

We used the CAG regimen (low-dose cytarabine [10 mg/m2 per 12 hours, days 1-14], aclarubicin [14 mg/m2 per day, days 1-4], and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [200 micrograms/m2 per day, days 1-14]) for the treatment of patients with primary resistant acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and previously untreated elderly patients with AML, secondary AML, and refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation (RAEB-T) in addition to relapsed AML. Forty-three of 69 (62%) patients achieved complete remission (CR), including 29 of 35 (83%) patients with relapsed AML, 1 of 8 patients with primary resistant AML, 5 of 8 elderly patients with previously untreated AML, and 8 of 18 patients with previously untreated secondary AML or RAEB-T. Ten of 22 (45%) patients > or = 65 years old achieved CR. The patients who achieved CR received at least 1 course of modified CAG therapy as the first consolidation therapy, followed by various second consolidation and intensification therapies. The median disease-free survival and overall survival were 8 and 15 months, respectively, for relapsed AML; 11 and 8 months for the elderly patients; and 8 and 17 months for secondary AML and RAEB-T. Myelosuppression was mild to moderate, and other than fever, severe nonhematologic toxicity was rare. CAG as the induction therapy seems promising for the treatment of various categories of poor-prognosis AML.     

Randomized trial of two schedules of low‐dose gemtuzumab ozogamicin as induction monotherapy for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia in older patients not considered candidates for intensive chemotherapy. A phase II study of the EORTC and GIMEMA leukaemia groups (AML‐19)

This study compared two schedules of low‐dose gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) as induction monotherapy for untreated acute myeloid leukaemia in older patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy, to identify the more promising regimen for further study. Patients were randomized to receive either best supportive care or a course of GO according to one of two schedules: 3 mg/m² on days 1, 3 and 5 (arm A), or GO 6 mg/m² on day 1 and 3 mg/m² on day 8 (arm B). Primary endpoint was the rate of disease non‐progression (DnP), defined as the proportion of patients either achieving a response or maintaining a stable disease following GO induction in each arm. Fifty‐six patients were randomized in the two GO arms (A, n = 29; B, n = 27). The rate of DnP was 38% [90% confidence interval (CI), 23–55] in arm A, and 63% (90% CI, 45–78) in arm B. Peripheral cytopenias were the most common adverse events for both regimens. The all‐cause early mortality rate was 14% in arm A and 11% in arm B. The day 1 + 8 schedule, which was associated with the highest rate of DnP, met the statistical criteria to be selected as the preferred regimen for phase III comparison with best supportive care.     

Gemtuzumab ozogamicin in combination with vorinostat and azacitidine in older patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia: a phase I/II study

Epigenetic therapeutics such as the histone deacetylase inhibitor, vorinostat, and the DNA methyltransferase I inhibitor, azacitidine, enhance gemtuzumab ozogamicin efficacy in vitro. We therefore investigated vorinostat/azacitidine/gemtuzumab ozogamicin in 52 adults aged 50 years or over with acute myeloid leukemia requiring therapy for first relapse (remission duration ≤12 months) or primary refractory disease in a phase I/II trial. Vorinostat and gemtuzumab ozogamicin were escalated step-wise during the phase I portion of the trial. Vorinostat (400 mg/day orally from Days 1–9), azacitidine (75 mg/m²/day intravenously or subcutaneously from Days 1–7), and gemtuzumab ozogamicin (3 mg/m²/day intravenously on Days 4 and 8) were identified as the maximum tolerated dose. Among the 43 patients treated at this dose, 10 achieved a complete remission and 8 achieved a complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery, for an overall response rate of 41.9% (exact 95% confidence interval (CI): 27.0–57.9%). Four of these 18 patients (2 with complete remission and 2 with complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery) had persistence of minimal residual disease by flow cytometry at the time of best response. Four patients died within 28 days of treatment initiation. Median overall survival for the 18 patients achieving complete remission/complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery was significantly longer than for those 21 patients who failed therapy but lived at least 29 days after treatment initiation (224.5 days (range 70–798) vs. 95 days (range 36–900); P=0.0023). These data indicate that vorinostat/azacitidine/gemtuzumab ozogamicin has activity in this difficult-to-treat acute myeloid leukemia patient subset. (ClinicalTrials.gov: identifier 00895934).     

Phase II study of tosedostat with cytarabine or decitabine in newly diagnosed older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia or high‐risk MDS

Tosedostat, an oral aminopeptidase inhibitor, has synergy with cytarabine and hypomethylating agents. We performed a Phase II trial to determine rates of complete remission (CR) and survival using tosedostat with cytarabine or decitabine in older patients with untreated acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) or high‐risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Thirty‐four patients ≥60 years old (median age 70 years; range, 60–83) were randomized to receive tosedostat (120 mg on days 1–21 or 180 mg continuously) with 5 d of either cytarabine (1 g/m²/d) or decitabine (20 mg/m²/d) every 35 d. Twenty‐nine patients (85%) had AML, including 15 (44%) with secondary AML/MDS, and 5 (15%) had MDS‐refractory anaemia with excess blasts type 2. The CR/CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) rate was 53% [9 in each arm; 14 CR (41%) and 4 CRi (12%)], attained in 6 of 14 patients with adverse cytogenetics and 4 of 7 with FLT3‐internal tandem duplication mutations. Median follow‐up was 11·2 months (range, 0·5–22·3), and median survival was 11·5 months (95% confidence interval, 5·2–16·7). Twenty‐three patients (67·6%) were treated as outpatients and 10 of these patients required hospitalization for febrile neutropenia. No Grade 3–4 non‐haematological toxicities required withdrawal from study. Tosedostat with cytarabine or decitabine is tolerated in older patients with untreated AML/MDS, results in a CR/CRi rate of >50%, and warrants further study in larger trials.     

Clofarabine and cytarabine combination as induction therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in patients 50 years of age or older

Outcome of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are older than 60 years of age remains unsatisfactory, with low remission rates and poor overall survival. We have previously established the activity of clofarabine plus cytarabine in AML relapse. We have now conducted a phase 2 study of clofarabine plus cytarabine in patients aged 50 years or older with previously untreated AML. Clofarabine was given at 40 mg/m2 as a 1-hour intravenous infusion for 5 days (days 2 to 6) followed 4 hours later by cytarabine at 1 g/m2/d as a 2-hour intravenous infusion for 5 days (days 1 to 5). Of 60 patients, 29 (48%) had secondary AML, 30 (50%) had abnormal karyotypes (monosomy 5 and/or 7 in 15 [25%]), and 11 (21%) showed FLT3 abnormalities. The overall response (OR) rate was 60% (52% CR, 8% CRp). Four patients (7%) died during induction. Adverse events were mainly grade 2 or lower and included diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, mucositis, skin reactions, liver test abnormalities, and infusion-related facial flushing and headaches. Myelosuppression was common. Clofarabine plus cytarabine has activity in adult AML, achieving a good CR rate. However, survival does not appear to be improved compared with other regimens. Modifications of this combination in AML therapy of older patients warrant further evaluation.     

A phase I/II study of the combination of quizartinib with azacitidine or low-dose cytarabine for the treatment of patients with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome

The FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) mutation in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with poor prognosis. We hypothesized that quizartinib, a selective and potent FLT3 inhibitor, with azacitidine (AZA) or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) might improve the outcomes in patients with FLT3-ITD-mutated AML. In this open-label phase I/II trial, patients of any age receiving first-salvage treatment for FLT3-ITD AML or age >60 years with untreated myelodysplastic syndrome or AML were treated with quizartinib plus AZA or LDAC. Seventy-three patients were treated (34 frontline, 39 first salvage). With regard to previously untreated patients, the composite response (CRc) rate was 87% (n=13/15: 8 complete responses [CR], 4 CR with incomplete hematologic recovery [CRi], 1 CR without platelet recovery [CRp]) among the patients treated with quizartinib/AZA and 74% (n=14/19: 1 CR, 8 CRi, 5 CRp) among those treated with quizartinib/LDAC. The median overall survival was 19.2 months for the cohort treated with quizartinib/AZA cohort and 8.5 months for the patients treated with quizartinib/LDAC; the corresponding relapse-free survival figures were 10.5 and 6.4 months, respectively. With regard to previously treated patients, the CRc rate was 64% (n=16/25 in the quizartinib/AZA cohort and 29% (n=4/14)) in the quizartinib/LDAC cohort. The median overall survival for patients treated with quizartinib/AZA and quizartinib/LDAC was 12.8 versus 4 months, respectively. QTc prolongation grade 3 occurred in only one patient in each cohort. Quizartinib-based combinations, particularly with AZA, appear effective in both frontline and first salvage therapy for patients with FLT3-ITD-mutated AML and are well tolerated. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT01892371","term_id":"NCT01892371"}}NCT01892371.     

A phase 2, multicenter study investigating ofatumumab and bendamustine combination in patients with untreated or relapsed CLL

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of the combination of ofatumumab and bendamustine in patients with previously untreated or relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Patients received IV ofatumumab (cycle 1: 300 mg day 1 and 1,000 mg day 8; cycles 2–6: 1,000 mg on day 1 every 28 days) and IV bendamustine 90 mg m^?2 (previously untreated) or 70 mg m^?2 (relapsed) on days 1 and 2 of each 28‐day cycle, for up to 6 cycles. Forty‐four previously untreated and 53 relapsed patients were enrolled. Median age was 62.5 years (previously untreated) and 68 years (relapsed); relapsed patients had received a median of 1 (range 1–11) prior therapy. The investigator‐assessed overall response rate was 95% (43% complete response [CR]) for the previously untreated, and 74% (11% CR) for the relapsed patients. The regimen was well tolerated with 89% (previously untreated) and 85% (relapsed patients) receiving all 6 cycles. No unexpected toxicities were reported. Grade 3/4 events occurred in 57% of previously untreated, and 72% of relapsed patients. At ～29 months’ follow‐up, the median progression‐free survival (PFS) was not reached for the previously untreated population, and the 28‐month PFS estimate was 72.3%. The median PFS for the relapsed population was 22.5 months (95% CI: 14.0–27.3 months). The combination of ofatumumab and bendamustine was well tolerated and effective in these previously untreated or relapsed populations. Am. J. Hematol. 91:900–906, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

A phase I study of lenalidomide plus chemotherapy with idarubicin and cytarabine in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome

Patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have poor outcomes and hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only curative treatment. New targeted therapies improved survival in select patients with specific mutations, however management of patients without these molecular alterations is an unmet need. We conducted a phase one study of lenalidomide in combination with cytarabine/idarubicin salvage chemotherapy in patients with R/R AML and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. A total of 33 patients were enrolled in the study (30 AML, 3 MDS), and treated at three dose levels with 3 + 3 design. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was seen in eight patients, including four hematologic DLTs. The most commonly observed non-hematologic serious adverse events were febrile neutropenia, rash, sepsis and renal injury. Dose level −1, consisting of 25 mg/d lenalidomide D1-21, 1 g/m² cytarabine D5-8, and 8 mg/m² idarubicin D5-7 was determined to be the maximum tolerated dose. Note, 15/33 (45%) of patients were able to receive pre-planned 21 days of lenalidomide. Overall, 18 patients achieved complete remission (CR) (n = 14) or CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) (n = 4) with total CR/CRi rate of 56%. The 1-year and 2-year overall survival (OS) were 24% and 10%, respectively. Among responders, 10/18 underwent allogeneic HCT and had a 1-year OS of 40%. There was no molecular pattern associated with response. These data demonstrate that the combination had clinical activity in R/R AML. This regimen should be further investigated for patients who relapsed after HCT, and as a bridge therapy to HCT. ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01132586).     

A phase 1b/2 study of vosaroxin in combination with cytarabine in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia

Vosaroxin is a first-in-class anticancer quinolone derivative that intercalates DNA and inhibits topoisomerase II. This study assessed the safety and tolerability of vosaroxin plus cytarabine in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Escalating vosaroxin doses (10-minute infusion; 10–90 mg/m²; days 1, 4) were given in combination with cytarabine on one of two schedules: schedule A (24-hour continuous intravenous infusion, 400 mg/m²/day, days 1–5) or schedule B (2-hour intravenous infusion, 1 g/m²/day, days 1–5). Following dose escalation, enrollment was expanded at the maximum tolerated dose. Of 110 patients enrolled, 108 received treatment. The maximum tolerated dose of vosaroxin was 80 mg/m² for schedule A (dose-limiting toxicities: grade 3 bowel obstruction and stomatitis) and was not reached for schedule B (recommended phase 2 dose: 90 mg/m²). In the efficacy population (all patients in first relapse or with primary refractory disease treated with vosaroxin 80–90 mg/m²; n=69), the complete remission rate was 25% and the complete remission/complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery rate was 28%. The 30-day all-cause mortality rate was 2.5% among all patients treated at a dose of 80–90 mg/m². Based upon these results, a phase 3 trial of vosaroxin plus cytarabine was initiated in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia.     

The treatment of acute myeloid leukemia with mitoxantrone,etoposide and low-dose cytarabine in elderly patients - a report of Polish Acute Leukemia Group (PALG) phase II study

The common dilemma in the treatment of elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is whether to use intensive myelosuppresive therapy with higher risk of treatment related mortality (TRM), but a chance for complete remission (CR), or to treat less intensively in order to prolong survival time with a better quality of life. The aim of this prospective, phase II study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of low dose combination induction treatment consisted of cytarabine at a dose of 10 mg/m2 every 12 h s.c. for 7 days, VP-16 at a dose of 100 mg/day p.o. for 7 days and mitoxantrone at a dose of 6 mg/m2 i.v daily on days 1-3. Two induction courses were planned. In the group of 44 patients 12 (27%) achieved CR, 4 (9%) patients were in PR and there were 9 (20%) early deaths (ED). Age, performance status, preceding myelodysplastic syndrome, karyotype, WBC and % of blasts in bone marrow were not significant prognostic factors for CR probability. The following initial factors appeared to be related to a shorter duration of survival time from the start of treatment: age >70 (p<0.03), poor performance status (p<0.03), and % of BM blasts 50 (p<0.05). We conclude that, despite promising results in the pilot study the efficacy of this induction treatment is not better than the efficacy of other regimens. The hematological toxicity of this treatment seems to be comparable with "3+7" regimen.