Evaluation by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of changed bone density in metastatic bone sites as a consequence of systemic treatment

Fourteen cancer patients with bone metastases from various primary malignancies were submitted to repeated dual X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan before and after systemic antineoplastic treatments. In the nine patients with lytic lesions the Bone Mineral Density (BMD) increased after chemotherapy + pamidronate in four (by +11.2%, +7.5%, +5.0% and +6.6%, respectively), decreased in four (by -19.9%, -8.1%, -7.5%, and -7.0%, respectively) and remained unchanged in one. BMD changes paralleled variations in painful symptomatology and biochemical markers. In patients with blastic metastases the BMD on target metastatic lesions did not change after hormone therapy or chemotherapy in one case but showed a significant increase in four. BMD increase was associated to bone pain improvement and PSA decrease in two cases, and with a worsening in skeletal pain and/or serum PSA in the remaining two. Our data suggest that BMD evaluation by DEXA instrument may be a reliable tool in assessing the response of bone metastases to treatment.     

Biologic and therapeutic determinants of bone mineral density in multiple myeloma

The net impact of malignancy and anti-tumor therapy on bone resorption in myeloma is poorly understood because conventional skeletal radiographs are relatively insensitive for the diagnosis and monitoring of bone disease. We performed determinations of bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, femoral neck and radial diaphysis by dual energy X ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in 168 consecutive patients with myeloma seen at our institution. Follow up studies were performed in 41 of these patients. A detailed analysis of patient and disease characteristics was performed to identify the determinants of BMD. Compared to normal age and sex matched controls, mean (+/- SE) BMD was significantly decreased at the lumbar spine (Z score -0.4 +/- 0.10) and femoral neck (Z score -1.0 +/- 0.10), but was surprisingly above normal at the radial diaphysis (Z score +0.35 +/- 0.10), a cortical bone site devoid of hematopoietic marrow, suggesting a differential bone preserving effect at this site. Lack of correlation between the BMD findings and the presence or extent of radiographically evident osteolytic lesions suggested the presence of a systemic bone disease. On multivariate analysis, duration of disease >12 months (p = 0.003) and female sex (p = 0.01) were independently associated with a lower BMD at the femoral neck/lumbar spine. On follow up DEXA (n = 41), BMD increased at > or = 1 site in 9 of 20 patients receiving bisphosphonates and in only 2 of 21 patients not receiving such therapy (p = 0.02). Similarly a decline in BMD at > or = 1 site was seen in 9 of 21 patients not receiving bisphosphonates, irrespective of the disease response status. Interval pamidronate therapy (p = 0.0007) and a low serum beta-2-microglobulin (< 2.5 mg/l) (p = 0.04) were the two most significant variables associated with an increase in BMD on multivariate analysis. These data suggest that myeloma is associated with a systemic bone disease with progressive generalized cancellous bone loss and a bone preserving effect on the radial cortical bone. The early use of bisphosphonates may improve myeloma related bone disease.     

The new bisphosphonate,Zometa (zoledronic acid), decreases skeletal complications in both osteolytic and osteoblastic lesions: a comparison to pamidronate

Bisphosphonates are the treatment of choice for lytic bone lesions associated with breast cancer. In contrast, bone lesions associated with prostate cancer are predominately osteoblastic. Zoledonic acid (Zol) is a new-generation bisphosphonate that is approximately 2-3 orders of magnitude more potent than pamidronate (Pam) in preclinical models and has demonstrated clinical efficacy in patients with both lytic and blastic lesions. Zoledonic acid (4 mg via 15 min infusion) every 3-4 weeks was directly compared to Pam (90 mg via 2 hr infusion) in 767 patients with breast cancer and bone metastases. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients experiencing a skeletal-related event (SRE) over 13 months. Zoledonic acid was as effective as Pam, and the proportion of Zol-treated patients with an SRE (42% in the hormonal therapy strata and 44% in the chemotherapy strata) was comparable to the original studies comparing Pam to placebo. Among 371 breast cancer patients receiving hormonal therapy, the proportion of patients with an SRE was 47% for Pam vs. 57% for placebo (P = 0.057), and among 380 patients treated with chemotherapy, the proportions with an SRE were 43% for Pam vs. 56% for placebo (P = 0.008) at 12 months. Zoledronic acid (4 mg) has been compared to placebo in a randomized Phase III trial involving 422 men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer metastatic to bone. Zoledonic acid demonstrated a significant advantage over placebo for median time to first SRE (median not reached for Zol vs. 321 days for placebo; P = 0.011), the proportion of patients with an SRE over 15 months (33 vs. 44% for placebo; P = 0.021), and mean skeletal morbidity rate (number of SREs/time, 0.08 vs. 1.49 for placebo; P = 0.006). In addition, the effects of Zol were apparent early. At 3 months, only 12% of Zol-treated patients had an SRE vs. 23% for placebo (P = 0.003), and at 6 months, the proportions were 21 vs. 31% for placebo (P = 0.025). In contrast, a previous study of Pam in 236 prostate cancer patients found that Pam was no more effective than placebo in reducing bone pain or SREs over 6 months. In these studies, Zol was well tolerated with a safety profile similar to other IV bisphosphonates. In conclusion, Zol is the first bisphosphonate to demonstrate efficacy in both lytic and blastic disease. The unique properties of this novel agent should be further explored in future clinical trials.     

Pamidronate reduces skeletal morbidity in women with advanced breast cancer and lytic bone lesions: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Protocol 18 Aredia Breast Cancer Study Group.

PURPOSE: To assess whether pamidronate can reduce the frequency of skeletal morbidity in women with lytic bone metastases from breast cancer treated with hormone therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred seventy-two women with breast cancer who had at least one lytic bone lesion and who were receiving hormonal therapy were randomized to receive 90 mg of pamidronate or placebo as a 2-hour intravenous infusion given in double-blind fashion every 4 weeks for 24 cycles. Patients were evaluated for skeletal complications: pathologic fractures, spinal cord compression, irradiation of or surgery on bone, or hypercalcemia. The skeletal morbidity rate (the ratio of the number of skeletal complications to the time on trial) was the primary efficacy variable. Bone pain, use of analgesics, quality of life, performance status, bone tumor response, and biochemical parameters were also evaluated. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-two patients who received pamidronate and 189 who received placebo were assessable. The skeletal morbidity rate was significantly reduced at 12, 18, and 24 cycles in patients treated with 90 mg of pamidronate (P = .028, .023, and .008, respectively). At 24 cycles, the proportion of patients having had any skeletal complication was 56% in the pamidronate group and 67% in the placebo group (P = .027). The time to the first skeletal complication was longer for patients receiving pamidronate than for those given placebo (P = .049). There was no statistical difference in survival or in objective bone response rate. Pamidronate was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Treatment with 90 mg of pamidronate as a 2-hour intravenous infusion every 4 weeks in addition to hormonal therapy significantly reduces skeletal morbidity from osteolytic metastases.     

Efficacy of zoledronic acid in postmenopausal Japanese women with early breast cancer receiving adjuvant letrozole: 12-month results

Aromatase inhibitor-associated bone loss has not been proved in the Japanese or Asian women. The aim of this study was to evaluate an upfront or delayed strategy of bone protection therapy with zoledronic acid administered at 4 mg every 6 months in postmenopausal Japanese women with early breast cancer to compare with results of the Z-FAST and ZO-FAST studies in western countries. Postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive early breast cancer receiving adjuvant letrozole were randomly assigned to receive either upfront or delayed-start zoledronic acid (4 mg intravenously every 6 months). The delayed group received zoledronic acid when lumbar spine (L(2)-L(4)) bone mineral density (BMD) decreased to less than young adult mean -2.0SD or when a nontraumatic fracture occurred. The primary endpoint of this study was to compare the percent change in L(1)-L(4) BMD at 12 months between the groups. Secondary endpoints included percent changes in L(2)-L(4) and total hip (TH) BMD. The upfront and delayed groups included 94 and 95 patients, respectively. At 12 months, L(1)-L(4), L(2)-L(4), and TH BMD significantly decreased by 2.0, 2.4, and 2.4%, respectively, in the delayed group. L(1)-L(4) BMD was 4.9% higher in the upfront group than in the delayed group (95% CI 3.9-5.8%; p < 0.001). L(2)-L(4) BMD was 5.6% higher (95% CI 4.5-6.6%; p < 0.001), and TH BMD was 4.4% higher (95% CI 3.3-5.4%; p < 0.001). At 12 months, upfront zoledronic acid therapy prevented bone loss in postmenopausal Japanese women who were receiving adjuvant letrozole, confirming the Z-/ZO-FAST study results in western populations.     

The skeletal metastatic complications of renal cell carcinoma.

Of the 103 patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma 31 (30%) developed symptomatic radiologically confirmed skeletal metastases. These were typically lytic, predominantly affecting the axial skeleton and associated with considerable skeletal morbidity. Solitary bone lesions occurred in 14 (45%) of patients. The median survival of patients with bone metastases was 12 months. Hypercalcaemia was common in patients both with (29%) and without (44%) bone metastases. The number and rate of skeletal related events was similar to that seen from bone metastases from breast cancer. It would therefore be appropriate to evaluate the effectiveness of bisphosphonate treatment for reducing skeletal morbidity in advanced renal cell cancer with bone metastases.     

The response evaluation of bone metastases in mammary carcinoma. The value of radiology, scintigraphy, and biochemical markers of bone metabolism

The correlation between response of metastatic bone lysis and bone pain, various biochemical markers of bone metabolism, and radiological and scintigraphic findings was investigated in 49 women with breast cancer included in a calcitonin supportive therapy trial. All patients had dominant skeletal disease and were on stable systemic treatment (cytotoxic or hormonal) for a least 6 months before the first response evaluation. Bone pain correlated poorly with treatment response. Changes in sclerotic metastases did not show any apparent relation to changes in lytic lesions. A correlation between bone scans and lytic activity on radiographs was found. The absolute level of biochemical bone markers did not correlate with treatment response, but seemed instead to reflect the rate of bone turnover. The relative level of bone markers with respect to baseline showed better correlation to treatment response. The best conventional marker of disease activity was urinary hydroxyproline/creatinine. Propeptide of Type III procollagen (PIIINP), a novel marker reflecting collagen turnover, promises to be at least as sensitive as hydroxyproline. Stable and regressing patients had the same prognosis and significantly longer survival than progressors.     

Treatment of bone metastases from breast cancer with (3-amino-1-hydroxypropylidene)-1,1-bisphosphonate (APD)

Twenty-eight patients with progressive symptomatic bone metastases from breast cancer received (3-amino-1-hydroxypropylidene)-1,1-bisphosphonate (APD) 30 mg in 500 ml of 0.9% saline infused over 2 h every 14 days. No other systemic therapy for breast cancer was prescribed. All patients had progressed on at least one previous systemic treatment. APD was continued until the disease progressed. Patients were assessed for objective response by the UICC criteria. In addition, subjective response was determined by a pain questionnaire. Radiological evidence of bone healing with sclerosis of lytic disease (UICC partial response) was seen in 4 patients. The median duration of response was 10 months. Eleven patients had stable disease for at least 3 months (median 5 months) and 9 progressed. Symptomatic response occurred in 9 patients and 12 reported an improvement in quality of life. Treatment was tolerated well with no significant toxicity. In conclusion, long-term inhibition of bone destruction is possible with APD therapy alone and both subjective and objective responses are seen.     

乳腺癌脑转移全脑放疗后综合治疗的疗效观察

目的 评估乳腺癌脑转移全脑放疗后不同分子亚型乳腺癌患者综合治疗的疗效。方法 回顾性分析我院2002年1月至2010年12月间共101例乳腺癌脑转移患者的病例资料,其中48例全脑放疗后行综合治疗。根据患者雌激素、孕激素、人表皮生长因子受体2和Ki-67水平分为管腔A型、管腔B型、HER-2阳性型和三阴型4种生物亚型。自诊断脑转移开始计算生存时间,按照不同分子亚型放疗后的治疗情况分层分析,生存分析用Kaplan-Meier法。结果 全脑放疗后未进行和进行综合治疗患者的中位生存时间分别为5.1个月和8.5个月（P＜0.0001）。三阴型未进行和进行综合治疗患者的中位生存时间分别为4.8个月和6.1个月（P=0.051）,管腔A型分别为5.3个月和11.0个月（P＜0.0001）,管腔 B型分别为4.8个月和8.6个月（P＜0.0001）,HER-2阳性型分别为4.8个月和8.2个月（P＜0.0001）。结论 全脑放疗后综合治疗对管腔 A型、管腔 B型和HER 2阳性型乳腺癌脑转移患者能明显提高生存时间。     

Biological subtypes and survival outcomes in breast cancer patients with brain metastases (study of the anatolian society of medical oncology)

Background: The aim of this study is to determine the relationship between the survival outcomes and biological subtype in breast cancer patients with brain metastases. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated clinical data from 422 breast cancer patients with brain metastases between 2001 and 2011 from referral centers in Turkey. The study population was divided into four biological subtypes according to their hormone receptor status and HER2 expression. Results: Systemic treatment prolonged median overall survival (OS) after brain metastases in the entire group (14 vs. 3.2 months, p < 0.001). It also prolonged median OS after brain metastases in the triple negative (7.5 vs. 1.6 months, p = 0.010) and luminal A (14.3 vs. 7.1 months, p = 0.003) subgroups. The median OS for untreated patients, chemotherapy and/or hormonal therapy receiving patients, and chemotherapy and/or hormonal therapy plus targeted therapy receivers was 2, 5.8, and 17.7 months, respectively (p < 0.001), in the HER2-overexpressing subgroup. In the luminal B subgroup, it was 3.7, 5.3, and 15.4 months, respectively (p = 0.003). Conclusions: The use of systemic therapy improves OS after brain metastases in all biological subgroups. Targeted therapies also improve OS after brain metastases in HER2-positive patients. The combined use of targeted therapies and lapatinib are superior to single use and trastuzumab, respectively, in these patients.     

Breast cancer with skeletal metastases at initial diagnosis. Distinctive clinical characteristics and favorable prognosis

Fifteen patients with breast cancer who had skeletal metastases already present at the time the primary breast lesion was detected, were retrospectively identified. The majority were postmenopausal, estrogen receptor-positive, and had large (often neglected) primary lesions. Eleven patients were asymptomatic with respect to their skeletal metastases, although bone scans and bone roentgenograms revealed multiple areas of involvement in all patients. The median survival from the time of diagnosis was 33 months (range, 1-74 months); the 5-year actuarial survival was 45%. Systemic therapy with hormones or chemotherapy was effective in producing subjective responses; radiotherapy to painful bony areas was also an effective palliative treatment. Median survival in this group of patients was significantly improved when compared to our breast cancer patients who had extraskeletal metastases at initial diagnosis (33 versus 9 months, respectively), and to previously reported series of breast cancer patients with metastases at initial diagnosis. Since patients with Stage IV breast cancer and metastases limited to the skeleton often have prolonged survival, complications from bone metastases (e.g. pathologic fracture, epidural spinal cord compression) and other intercurrent illnesses should be managed aggressively.     

Bone mineral density loss during adjuvant chemotherapy in pre-menopausal women with early breast cancer: is it dependent on oestrogen deficiency?

Pre-menopausal women given adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer experience both premature ovarian failure and loss of bone mineral density (BMD), and this study was designed to see if these observations are causally linked. Chemotherapy was administered to 41 pre-menopausal women with early breast cancer enrolled prospectively in a study of ovarian function and BMD in such women given systemic therapy. After giving written informed consent, all patients underwent baseline and regular on-treatment measurements of BMD by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan, bone turnover and ovarian function by analysis of serum hormone levels and self-reported menstrual diaries. Baseline lumbar spine BMD in the 41 women given chemotherapy was higher than the normal population (Z score 0.28 ± 0.14 (mean ± SEM), P = 0.047), and fell significantly over the first 6 months from a mean of 1.05–1.01 g/m², P < 0.0001, and similar but smaller changes were demonstrated in hip BMD. This fall was independent of age at diagnosis, type of chemotherapy, development of amenorrhoea or either baseline or on-treatment estradiol concentration. During the 6 months after completion of adjuvant chemotherapy, BMD fell further only in those women with low estradiol or experiencing amenorrhoea during the first 6 months, although all groups showed evidence of increased bone turnover. This study demonstrates loss of both spine and hip BMD in pre-menopausal women during 6 months’ adjuvant systemic chemotherapy to be independent of changes in ovarian function. Ovarian function was, however, related to BMD changes after chemotherapy ceased.     

74例乳腺癌骨转移的临床预后因素分析

目的:探讨乳腺癌骨转移的临床特征并分析其预后因素。方法:回顾74例乳腺癌骨转移好发部位、病灶特点、发生时间、激素受体分布情况等并用COX比例风险模型进行乳腺癌骨转移预后因素分析。结果:乳腺癌骨转移好发部位在胸部与脊柱,尤其是肋骨和腰椎,几乎均为溶骨性病灶。骨转移平均发生时间为术后33.4个月。骨转移患者中激素受体阳性率比例较高。COX比例风险模型分析显示雌激素受体状况、病理类型和初发单/多发骨转移情况是影响乳腺癌骨转移预后的独立因素。结论:雌激素受体状况、病理类型和初发单/多发骨转移情况是影响乳腺癌骨转移预后的独立因素。对乳腺癌骨转移规律的认识有助于临床诊断和治疗。     

Optimal doses and timing for tele-irradiation of bone metastases in patients with life expectancy more than 3 months

The aim of the current study was to improve the bone metastases irradiation parameters in patients with life expectancy more than 3 months. The current randomized study included a total of 333 patients with bone metastases (breast cancer metastases in 71% of cases) receiving 488 courses of photon irradiation. Irradiation effect was observed in 95.8-100% of cases regardless of fraction number and irradiation regimen. The rate of complete effect was the same for all irradiation regimens, but raised gradually from 33.3% to 50.4% and 65.9% respectively when irradiation was given by 2, 3 and 4 fractions, 6,5 Gy each (p < 0.03); 78.4% (p < 0.01) cases of complete effect were observed in patients receiving irradiation by multiple small fraction compared to the groups receiving irradiation by 2 or 3 fractions of 6.5 Gy. The complete effect was more often observed in breast cancer (67%) and prostate cancer (63%) patients in comparison to lung cancer (47%) and renal cancer (30%) patients (p < 0,05) independent of metastases localization. The mean frequency of pain recurrence in irradiated area was 8.2% in all primary tumor and metastases localizations, irrespective of irradiation dose and regimen. Based on above results we recommend for breast cancer and prostate cancer patients with bone metastases and life expectancy more than 3 months the irradiation with 19.5 Gy given by 3 fractions. The patients with metastasizing lung and renal cancer should receive 26 Gy irradiation by 4 fractions 6.5 Gy each given once every 5.     

Skeletal effects of exemestane on bone-mineral density, bone biomarkers, and fracture incidence in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer participating in the Intergroup Exemestane Study (IES): a randomised controlled study

BACKGROUND: Tamoxifen preserves bone in postmenopausal women, but non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors accelerate bone loss and increase fracture risk. We aimed to study the effect on bone health in a subgroup of women included in the Intergroup Exemestane Study (IES), a large randomised trial that compared the switch to the steroidal aromatase inhibitor exemestane with continuation of tamoxifen in the adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal breast cancer. METHODS: Results were analysed from 206 evaluable patients from the IES, in which postmenopausal women with histologically confirmed and completely resected unilateral breast cancer (that was oestrogen-receptor positive or of unknown status), who were disease-free after 2-3 years of treatment with tamoxifen were randomised to continue oral tamoxifen 20 mg/day or switch to oral exemestane 25 mg/day to complete a total of 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy. The primary endpoint was change in bone-mineral density (BMD) assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover were also analysed in this substudy, and the incidence of fractures in the entire study reported. The IES is registered on the Current Controlled Trials website . FINDINGS: Within 6 months of switching to exemestane, BMD was lowered by 0.051 g/cm(3) (2.7%; 95% CI 2.0-3.4; p<0.0001) at the lumbar spine and 0.025 g/cm(3) (1.4%; 0.8-1.9; p<0.0001) at the hip compared with baseline. BMD decreases were only 1.0% (0.4-1.7; p=0.002) and 0.8% (0.3-1.4; p=0.003) in year 2 at the lumbar spine and hip, respectively. No patient with BMD in the normal range at trial entry developed osteoporosis. Bone resorption and formation markers increased at all time points in women receiving exemestane (p<0.001). With a median follow-up in all IES participants (n=4274) of 58 months, 162 (7%) and 115 (5%) patients in the exemestane and tamoxifen groups, respectively, had fractures (odds ratio 1.45 [1.13-1.87]; p=0.003). INTERPRETATION: These results indicate that the increase in survival shown previously with the IES switch strategy is achieved at the expense of some detriment to skeletal health, so the risk-benefit ratio to women needs to be individually assessed.     

Stage IV breast cancer: clinical course and survival of patients with osseous versus extraosseous metastases at initial diagnosis. The GOCS (Grupo Oncológico Cooperativo del Sur) experience

The medical records of 414 patients with metastatic breast carcinoma treated between 1978 and 1986 were reviewed and 44 women were identified as having stage IV disease when the primary breast lesion was detected. Of these 44 women, 25 had metastatic disease limited to the skeleton while 19 had extraosseous lesions only. The clinical features, response to therapy, and survival were analyzed and compared for both groups. The median survival of those patients with bone-only metastases was 52 months as compared with 13 months for those with extraskeletal lesions (p = 0.0025). The response rate to first-line systemic therapy was similar for both groups (47% for bone metastases and 44% for extraosseous metastases). The median duration of response was 14 months (range, 3-55 months) for patients with bone disease and 8 months (range, 4-43 months) for those with extraskeletal lesions. We conclude that patients with metastatic breast cancer confined to the skeleton at initial diagnosis tend to follow an indolent, chronic course with prolonged survival. Therefore the increase in response rate with aggressive chemotherapy should be balanced against its higher morbidity. Further studies are needed to confirm whether the better prognosis of these patients is determined by the anatomical confinement of the disease to the skeleton or merely reflects the influence of other prognostic factors.     

Osteocalcin as a Biological Marker in the Therapeutic Management of Breast Cancer Bone Metastases

Circulating osteocalcin (BGP), the major noncollagenous bone protein, is elevated in patients with certain metabolic bone disease while its behavior in cancer patients, particularly those with bone metastases, is unclear. We measured circulating BGP in 37 healthy females, in 13 female patients with benign breast disease, and in a group of 51 cancer patients (breast, lung, prostate, and bladder) with and without bone metastases, before and after 4'-epidoxorubicin (4'-Epidx) therapy (4'-Epidx 120 mg/m² every 3 weeks). Under basal conditions, mean BGP levels of all of these subjects fell within the normal range of 2.0-5.0 ng/ml (mean SD, 4.8 1.0 ng/ml). In cancer patients without bone metastases BGP levels measured before and after 4'-Epidx therapy were not significantly different (4.4 versus 4.6 ng/ml). Only in breast cancer patients with multiple bone metastases was circulating BGP higher after the onset of antiblastic treatment and through the entire course of therapy, accompanied by bone pain remission and regression of bone lesions (BGP = 6.7 1.3 ng/ml). Thus an increase in BGP concentration can be considered as a biological marker of recovered osteoblast activity during therapeutically induced stabilization or regression of skeletal metastatic lesions.     

Two bedridden patients with bone metastases from breast cancer effectively treated with pamidronate therapy

Case 1: A 43-year-old woman underwent mastectomy because of locally advanced breast cancer with multiple bone metastases. She was treated with CMF therapy but developed a compression fracture of a thoracic vertebra after 10 months and received pamidronate therapy. Pamidronate administration relived her back pain after 2 months and she was able to walk again after 3 months. However, she developed a resistance to the treatment, and then refused another treatment. She was found to have hypercalcemia 6 months later and received pamidronate again, but died 9 months after the treatment. Case 2: A 52-year-old woman underwent mastectomy because of breast cancer (T2) and was diagnosed as having multiple bone metastases 24 months after the operation. She could not turn over in bed due to progressing bone pain and received pamidronate therapy with CMF therapy at home 23 months after the diagnosis. After 2 months, pamidronate administration relieved her bone pain and she was free of pain after 4 months. After 5 months, X-rays revealed that lytic lesions showed sclerosis, and the pamidronate therapy was assessed as producing a PR. Pamidronate therapy improved her quality of life and activities of daily living, and she continues to receive it this time as an outpatient. Pamidronate therapy is promising as an effective treatment for bedridden patients with bone metastasis from breast cancer.     

Bone metastases in breast cancer

Opinion statement Patients with advanced breast cancer who develop bone metastases suffer from longterm skeletal morbidity. Complications of bone metastases include pain, pathologic fractures, and spinal cord compression, which have a significant impact on the quality of life of patients. Treatment options for patients with bone metastases include surgery, radiation, and analgesics to reduce bone pain and to prevent or repair fractures. Intravenous bisphosphonates can delay the onset of bone metastasis and reduce the percentage of patients who experience skeletal complications of bone metastasis, thus reducing skeletal morbidity. For the past 6 years, pamidronate disodium (90 mg administered by 2-hour intravenous infusion) has been the treatment of choice for the prevention of skeletal complications of bone metastases in patients with breast cancer. However, a more potent bisphosphonate, zoledronic acid (4 mg administered by 15-minute intravenous infusion), was approved for use and has improved efficacy in patients with bone metastases. Because of the increased efficacy and more convenient infusion time, zoledronic acid may become the new standard of care for the treatment and prevention of skeletal complications secondary to bone metastases in patients with breast cancer. Phase III clinical trials have shown that patients with an existing skeletal complication are more likely to develop subsequent complications compared with patients who have not experienced a complication. Therefore, zoledronic acid therapy should be initiated when the patient is diagnosed with bone metastasis.     

Effect of denosumab on bone mineral density in women receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitors for non-metastatic breast cancer: subgroup analyses of a phase 3 study

Denosumab increased lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) versus placebo in a 2-year, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study of patients with hormone-receptor-positive, non-metastatic breast cancer and low bone mass who were receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy. In subgroup analyses at 12 and 24 months, we evaluated factors (duration and type of aromatase inhibitor, tamoxifen use, age, time since menopause, body mass index, T-score) that might influence BMD at the lumbar spine, total hip, femoral neck, and 1/3 radius. Patients were randomized to receive placebo (n = 125) or 60 mg denosumab (n = 127) subcutaneously every 6 months. In all subgroups, 12 or 24 months’ treatment with denosumab was associated with larger BMD gains than placebo across multiple skeletal sites. Most increases were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Twice-yearly administration of denosumab, regardless of patient subgroup or skeletal site, resulted in consistent increases in BMD versus placebo at 12 and 24 months.