Pulmonary infections. The Minnesota randomized prospective trial of cyclosporine vs azathioprine-antilymphocyte globulin for immunosuppression in renal allograft recipients

Nineteen of 224 renal allograft recipients who were prospectively randomized to receive either cyclosporine (n = 117) or azathioprine sodium-antilymphocyte globulin (n = 107) for immunosuppression suffered from one period of pneumonia (14 azathioprine and five cyclosporine recipients); two recipients of azathioprine had two episodes. Four patients in the azathioprine group and one in the cyclosporine group died, for mortalities of 3.7% and 0.85%, respectively. The percentage of pneumonia-free patients at one year was 96.3% in the cyclosporine group while it was 90.8% in the azathioprine group. Nondiabetics, women, and recipients of grafts from living related donors were at a statistically lower risk of developing pneumonia when treated with cyclosporine. Viral (cytomegalovirus), fungal (Candida, Aspergillus), and multibacterial causes of pneumonia each occurred with a similar incidence.     

A single institution, randomized, prospective trial of cyclosporin versus azathioprine-antilymphocyte globulin for immunosuppression in renal allograft recipients.

Between September 26, 1980 and December 31, 1983, 230 splenectomized, transfused renal allograft recipients were randomized to treatment with either cyclosporin-prednisone (N = 121, 68 diabetic and 53 nondiabetic recipients; 73 cadaver and 48 related donor grafts) or azathioprine-prednisone-antilymphocyte globulin (N = 109, 61 diabetic and 48 nondiabetic recipients; 69 cadaver and 40 related donor grafts). The results were analyzed on March 31, 1984. Actuarial patient survival rates at 2 years were 88% in the cyclosporin and 91% in the azathioprine groups (p = 0.649). Graft survival rates at 2 years were 82% in all cyclosporin and 77% in all azathioprine-treated recipients (p = 0.150); the corresponding figures in the recipients of related donor grafts were 87% vs. 83% (p = 0.656), and in the recipients of cadaver donor grafts were 78% vs. 73% (p = 0.178). The 2-year graft survival rates were 81% in cyclosporin and 74% in azathioprine-treated diabetic recipients (p = 0.150) and 83% in cyclosporin and 81% in azathioprine-treated nondiabetic recipients (p = 0.604). Within the cyclosporin and azathioprine treatment groups, the differences in graft survival rates between diabetic and nondiabetic recipients were not significant (p = 0.822 and 0.423, respectively). Although there were no significant differences in graft survival rates, the cumulative incidence of rejection episodes within the first post-transplant year was significantly lower in the cyclosporin (34%) than in the azathioprine (60%) treated recipients (p = 0.001). In recipients of technically successful cadaver kidney grafts, the incidence of acute tubular necrosis (ATN) was 31% in cyclosporin and 30% in azathioprine-treated recipients (p = 0.822). Graft survival rates in azathioprine- and cyclosporin-treated recipients who did or did not undergo ATN were 72% vs. 89% (p = 0.011). The mean (+/- S.D.) serum creatinine levels (mg/dl) at 1 year were higher in cyclosporin (2.0 +/- 0.6) than in azathioprine (1.5 +/- 0.5) treated recipients (p = less than 0.001). A reduction in cyclosporin dose because of nephrotoxicity was required in 96 of the cyclosporin-treated patients (70%), and 25 were switched to treatment with azathioprine (21%). The incidence of all infections in cyclosporin-treated patients was approximately half of that in azathioprine-treated patients, and only nine per cent of the cyclosporin-treated patients were diagnosed to have cytomegalovirus infections during the first post-transplant year vs. 28% in azathioprine-treated patients (p = 0.002).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Thromboembolic complications in renal allograft recipients. A report from the prospective randomized study of cyclosporine versus azathioprine-antilymphocyte globulin

The incidence of arterial and venous thromboembolic complications was compared in 224 renal allograft recipients who were prospectively randomized and stratified by risk to treatment with either cyclosporine-prednisone (CsA-P) (n = 117) or azathioprine-prednisone-antilymphocyte globulin (AZA-P-ALG) (n = 107). Thirteen CsA patients (11%) had 22 thromboembolic events, while 19 AZA patients (18%) had 24 events (P = 0.22). There was no significant difference between the 2 regimens in the number of patients with each type of venous or arterial event or in the number of patients with multiple or lethal events. The incidence of "minor" complications (all except myocardial infarction and stroke) in the related donor subgroup (n = 85) and the overall incidence of thromboembolism in the diabetic subgroup (n = 125) were both significantly higher in AZA-treated patients (P = 0.008 and 0.045, respectively). Thus, CsA immunosuppression does not appear to be a risk factor for thromboembolic disease, and it may in fact lower the incidence of thromboembolism in diabetic renal allograft recipients.     

A randomized controlled trial of immunosuppression conversion for the treatment of chronic allograft nephropathy.

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to assess the effect of immunosuppression conversion on progression of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). METHODS: Forty-two cyclosporin-treated renal transplant recipients were studied. Patients were included if they had a negatively sloping reciprocal of creatinine vs time (ROCT) plot for >6 months and biopsy-proven CAN. Patients were excluded if they had previously been treated with tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or their serum creatinine was >400 micromol/l. Subjects were randomly treated with either: (A) MMF/reduced dose cyclosporin [MMF for azathioprine 0.5-1.0 g bd; cyclosporin trough level (C(0)): 75-100 ng/ml]; (B) tacrolimus for cyclosporin (C(0): 5-10 ng/ml); or (C) continuation of standard therapy. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was measured at baseline and after 6 months. RESULTS: Two patients started dialysis within 6 months (one each from groups A and B). One patient in group A was intolerant of MMF, six others reported gastrointestinal symptoms and three developed anaemia. Cyclosporin dose was reduced by 24% [interquartile range (IQR): 14-27%] in group A [end-of-study C(0): 99 ng/ml (IQR: 90-113 ng/ml)]. In group B, the end-of-study tacrolimus C(0) was 7 ng/ml (5-9 ng/ml). The end-of-study cyclosporin C(0) in group C was 163 ng/ml (145-215 ng/ml). Comparison of ROCT slopes before and after intervention revealed a treatment advantage for group A (P<0.05). The GFR analysis was supportive (P = 0.05). When patients with GFR <20 ml/min/1.73 m(2) at enrollment were excluded from the analysis, the treatment advantage for group A reached statistical significance (n = 27, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: MMF/reduced dose cyclosporin is superior to tacrolimus-for-cyclosporin and standard dose cyclosporin in patients with CAN, at least in the short term. The cyclosporin dose reduction component is likely to be of particular importance. Other findings suggest that early intervention is beneficial.     

Sequential therapy--a prospective randomized trial of MALG versus OKT3 for prophylactic immunosuppression in cadaver renal allograft recipients.

We prospectively studied the use of prophylactic Minnesota antilymphocyte globulin vs. OKT3 in kidney transplant recipients. Between 7/1/87 and 9/1/90, 138 adult kidney and 35 kidney-pancreas recipients were randomized after stratification for age (18-49 vs. greater than or equal to 50), diabetes (diabetic vs. nondiabetic), transplant number (1 vs. greater than 1) and, for retransplants, the length of survival of the first graft (less than 1 year vs. greater than or equal to 1 year), and then randomized to receive 7 days of either MALG (20 mg/kg/day) or OKT3 (5 mg/day). Immunosuppression was otherwise identical in both groups; prednisone and azathioprine started on the day of surgery, and cyclosporine started on postoperative day 6. Minimum follow-up was 9 months. There was no difference in one- and two-year actuarial patient or graft survival rates, incidence of rejection, or serum creatinine level. MALG was associated with a higher incidence of cytomegalovirus; it was statistically significant in the subgroup of CMV seronegative recipients of kidneys from seropositive donors (P less than .05). OKT3 was more expensive and was associated with significantly more side effects: fever (P less than .0001), dyspnea (P = .04), and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (P = .02).     

Withdrawal of cyclosporine in renal transplant recipients with acute tubular necrosis improves renal function

Abstract In this study, patients with acute tubular necrosis (ATN) after renal transplantation were prospectively randomized to either conventional immunosuppression or withdrawal of cyclosporine and replacement with anti‐thymocyte globulin (ATG). The patients treated with cyclosporine withdrawal and ATG had a significantly shorter duration of ATN (8.9 ± 1.5 vs 10.8 ± 1.4 days; P < 0.05) and better renal function (mean serum creatinine on day 5 postoperatively: 740 ± 49 vs 918 ± 73 μmol/l; P < 0.05). The incidence of acute rejection was lower in the patients with cyclosporine withdrawal and ATG. In conclusion, cyclosporine is toxic to the renal allograft with ATN, and withdrawal of cyclosporine shortens the duration of ATN and improves renal function.     

A double-blind placebo controlled trial of simvastatin for the treatment of dyslipidaemia in renal allograft recipients

BACKGROUND: With current techniques, renal failure patients are now able to regain near-normal health following renal transplantation. However, the development of premature cardiovascular disease is a major problem. Dyslipidaemia may be an important contributor to this. The use of lipid lowering agents in renal allograft recipients has been limited by potential interaction of these agents with the now widely used immunosuppressive agent, cyclosporine. AIM: This study was designed to investigate efficacy and safety of simvastatin in subjects taking either cyclosporine or azothioprine post renal transplantation. METHODS: Fifty-one subjects (32 females, 19 males -- mean age 51 +/- 12.5 yr) who were at least 1 yr post transplant, had creatinine < or = 2.5 mmol/L and a total cholesterol > or = 6 mmol/L were enrolled in a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. After an initial 10-wk dietary period, the last 4 wk on placebo, subjects were randomised to receive either 5 mg simvastatin/d for 6 wk followed by 10 mg simvastatin/d for 6 wk, or matching placebo. After this 12-wk double-blind phase, there was an open-label phase when all subjects were treated with 10 mg simvastatin/d for a period of 36 wk. RESULTS: Compared to placebo, 5 mg simvastatin/d significantly decreased total cholesterol by 20% (p < 0.01), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL cholesterol) by 29% (p < 0.01), and Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) by 26% (p < 0.01). Increasing simvastatin to 10 mg/d did not lead to further significant changes. But high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL cholesterol) increased by 9% (p < 0.01) and Apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1) by 7% (p < 0.01) only on 10 mg simvastatin/d. During the open-label phase, subjects previously randomised to placebo achieved similar significant changes to their lipoprotein profile. The benefits achieved from simvastatin were maintained to the end of the study. There were three withdrawals from the study, all from the simvastatin/ cyclosporine group. Two subjects had musculoskeletal pain and 1 had abdominal pain. Minor adverse events were similar in both the simvastatin- and placebo-treated groups. CONCLUSION: Low-dose simvastatin is an effective and well-tolerated agent in the treatment of dyslipidaemia in renal allograft recipients.     

发生慢性移植肾功能不全者以西罗莫司替换环孢素A的临床疗效

目的 对采用以环孢素A(CsA)为基础免疫抑制剂的慢性移植肾功能不全(CRAD)患者,将CsA转换为西罗莫司(SRL),观察转换后的临床效果和安全性.方法 20例肾移植后出现CRAD的患者,采用突然转换法将CsA替换为SRL(3 mg/d),霉酚酸酯(MMF)和泼尼松(Pred)的剂量维持不变.另随机选取9例仍然使用CsA、MMF和Pred的CRAD患者作为对照.观察血肌酐(Cr)、肾小球滤过率(GFR)和24 h尿蛋白定量的变化情况以及SRL的不良反应.结果 对照组与转换组在患者年龄、性别构成比、移植后时间、转换时的血Cr水平和转换时免疫抑制剂用量等方面的差异均无统计学意义.随访1年,转换组有18例完成观察,其中11例(61.1%,11/18)转换有效,7例(38.9%,1/18)转换无效.转换有效者和转化无效者在转换时的血Cr、移植后时间、GFR及24 h尿蛋白定量等方面的差异有统计学意义.转换有效者的血Cr明显下降,GFR明显升高,而转换无效者的血Cr呈进行性升高,GFR呈进行性下降.转换治疗期间,1例出现急性排斥反应,经冲击治疗后逆转.完成随访的18例中,2例发生感染,3例出现皮疹,3例出现腹泻,2例出现口腔溃疡,8例出现骨髓抑制,6例转氨酶升高,10例出现高血脂,4例出现低血钾,没有患者因为上述不良反应而退出观察.结论 肾移植后采用以CsA为基础的免疫抑制方案者,若出现CRAD,可以将CsA替换为SRL,部分患者的肾功能得到改善,但转换应在移植肾功能发生严重损害前进行.     

Long-term, low-dose cyclosporine treatment of renal allograft recipients. A randomized trial

Ninety-two adult renal allograft recipients, receiving baseline immunosuppression with CsA and prednisone, were assigned randomly to one of the following regimens. CsA was discontinued (D/C group) in 47 recipients who were then maintained on Aza and prednisone; or Aza was added to continued low-dose CsA and prednisone (triple drug [TD] group) in 45 patients. Entry into the study required an absence of rejection and a stable creatinine for at least four months prior to randomization. The mean month of randomization was 8.34 +/- 2.9 for the D/C group, and 7.2 +/- 3.2 for the TD group. Following randomization, a significantly greater rate of rejection (P less than .01) was observed in the D/C group (40%) than in the TD group (13%). With a mean follow-up of 30 months, 41/47 of D/C allografts (87.2%) and 39/45 TD allografts (86.6%) were functioning. Nevertheless, rejection had a persistent adverse effect on allograft function, in both the D/C and TD groups, up to 36 months following randomization. Parameters such as donor-type and rejection prior to randomization did not identify recipients at risk for rejection following randomization. Therefore, although the CsA withdrawal regimen might be ideal, the opportunity to select appropriate candidates remained elusive. In contrast, the safety of the TD regimen became apparent. Neither significant nephrotoxicity nor hypertension was observed, and the opportunity for less daily prednisone was evident. Despite its additional cost, the TD regimen utilizing indefinite low-dose CsA, is preferred.     

Effect of cyclosporine A on long-term allograft function in pediatric renal transplant recipients

There have been concerns regarding long-term adverse effects of cyclosporine A (CSA) on renal allograft function. In a retrospective study, we compared long-term allograft function up to 70 months after renal transplantation in pediatric recipients treated with and without CSA, using iothalamate clearance to assess glomerular filtration rate. Patients received CSA, prednisone, and azathioprine (CSA group,n=16) or prednisone and azathioprine alone (Pred/AZA,n=11). At 48 months post transplant, the iothalamate clearances (mean±SD) were 57.9±26.8 ml/min per 1.73 m² in the CSA group and 68.5±20.2 in the Pred/AZA group (P>0.05). The mean of the slopes of individual iothalamate clearances versus time during the first 70 months following transplantation were –0.156 in the CSA group and –0.095 in the Pred/AZA group. Neither slope was statistically different from zero. These data suggest that allograft function is not significantly depressed by CSA at 48 months post transplantation and that there is no greater rate of decline in allograft function up to 70 months post transplantation in patients receiving CSA when compared with the AZA/Pred group.     

零点活检对活体肾移植术后受体肾功能的预测价值

目的探讨活体肾移植供肾零点活检对受体术后1年内移植肾功能的预测价值。方法 149例活体肾移植受者,根据是否同意活检和活检是否发现异常分为3组：未活检组（63例）,活检正常组（58例）和活检异常组（28例）。受体术后平均随访8个月,比较3组间受体术后移植肾功能恢复情况。结果供肾零点活检异常率为33%,其中肾小管炎7例,肾小管萎缩5例,肾小球硬化8例,肾小球钙化3例,肾小球玻璃样变3例,肾间质炎7例,肾间质纤维化1例,系膜增生2例以及小动脉玻璃样变2例（部分病例有一种以上病理改变）。供者年龄与移植前零点活检异常相关（P〈0.05）。从术后1个月之后至术后1年内,活检异常组各时间点受体血清肌酐均高于未活检组和活检正常组（均为P〈0.05）;术后3个月,活检异常组各时间点受体肾小球滤过率均低于未活检组和活检正常组（P〈0.05）,但术后1年内3组各随访时间点的血尿素氮比较差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。术后6个月内重复测量趋势分析显示,与活检正常组比较,活检异常组的血清肌酐和肾小球滤过率的变化趋势差异有统计学意义（均为P〈0.05）,活检异常组的血清肌酐与未活检组比较差异亦有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论活体供肾零点活检结果对术后1年内特别是术后6个月内移植肾功能有预测价值,具有临床实用性。     

The effect of bright light therapy on sleep and circadian rhythms in renal transplant recipients: a pilot randomized,multicentre wait‐list controlled trial

This study assessed the effect and feasibility of morning bright light therapy (BLT) on sleep, circadian rhythms, subjective feelings, depressive symptomatology and cognition in renal transplant recipients (RTx) diagnosed with sleep–wake disturbances (SWD). This pilot randomized multicentre wait‐list controlled trial included 30 home‐dwelling RTx randomly assigned 1:1 to either 3 weeks of BLT or a wait‐list control group. Morning BLT (10 000 lux) was individually scheduled for 30 min daily for 3 weeks. Wrist actimetry (measuring sleep and circadian rhythms), validated instruments (subjective feelings and cognition) and melatonin assay (circadian timing) were used. Data were analysed via a random‐intercept regression model. Of 30 RTx recipients (aged 58 ± 15, transplanted 15 ± 6 years ago), 26 completed the study. While BLT had no significant effect on circadian and sleep measures, sleep timing improved significantly. The intervention group showed a significant get‐up time phase advance from baseline to intervention (+24 min) [(standardized estimates (SE): ?0.23 (?0.42; ?0.03)] and a small (+14 min) but significant bedtime phase advance from intervention to follow‐up (SE: ?0.25 (?0.41; ?0.09). Improvement in subjective feelings and depressive symptomatology was observed but was not statistically significant. Bright light therapy showed preliminary indications of a beneficial effect in RTx with sleep–wake disturbances. (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01256983)     

A randomized, prospective, pharmacoeconomic trial of tacrolimus versus cyclosporine in combination with thymoglobulin in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: To date, the clinical trials of tacrolimus (TAC) versus cyclosporine modified (CsA), have not defined which agent is more cost-effective for immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients especially in a quadruple immunosuppressive regimen. METHODS: The objective of this randomized, prospective study was to compare the clinical and economic outcomes of TAC versus CsA, in a regimen that consisted of Thymoglobulin induction, an antimetabolite, and prednisone. Between December 2000 and October 2002, 200 patients were enrolled and randomized in a 2:1 fashion (TAC n=134, CsA n=66). RESULTS: At 1 year, acute rejection (4% TAC vs. 6% CsA), patient survival (TAC 99% vs. CsA 100%), and graft survival (95% TAC versus 100% CsA, P=0.059) were similar. Serum creatinine levels were lower in the TAC group compared with the CsA group (1.3+/-0.3 vs. 1.6+/-0.7 mg/dL, P=0.03). The incidence of CMV infection was similar between the groups and two patients, both in the TAC arm, developed malignancy. Anti-hypertensive requirement (32% TAC vs. 32% CsA) and the incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus (4% TAC vs. 2% CsA) were similar. Pretransplant, fewer TAC patients received dyslipidemia treatment (40% TAC vs. 67% CsA, P=0.0005), while more CsA patients were able to discontinue these medications posttransplant (absolute change 25% TAC vs. 47% CsA). Total 12-month medication costs were similar (17,723 +/- 11,647 dollars TAC vs. 16,515 +/- 10,189 dollars CsA). CONCLUSIONS: When combined with Thymoglobulin induction, an antimetabolite, and corticosteroids, TAC and CsA are comparable in safety, efficacy, and cost in renal transplantation.     

Use of cidofovir in polyomavirus BK viral nephropathy in two renal allograft recipients

Polyomavirus BK viral allograft nephropathy is a potentially reversible cause of deteriorating function of kidney allografts. Initial treatment involves reducing immunosuppressive medications, with low-dose cidofovir an effective alternative in refractory cases. We describe two cases of BK viral allograft nephropathy responding to low-dose cidofovir after a reduction in immunosuppressive medications failed to clear the virus or stabilize the deterioration in renal function. There were no significant side-effects from this treatment in either patient.     

A prospective randomized trial comparing the efficacy of tacrolimus versus cyclosporine in black recipients of primary cadaveric renal transplants.

BACKGROUND: We performed a prospective randomized trial to compare the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus (FK506) versus cyclosporine (CSA) in black primary cadaveric renal transplant (CRT) recipients. METHODS: Between December 1994 and February 1997, 35 black primary CRT recipients were enrolled in this trial. All patients received 7 days of induction therapy with OKT3. Fourteen patients received FK506 and prednisone only. Twenty-one patients received CSA, azathioprine, and prednisone. The two groups were comparable in terms of age, gender, plasma renin activity, human leukocyte antigen mismatches, and cause of renal failure. RESULTS: Patient and graft survival were 12 of 14 (86%) for the FK506 group and 20 of 21 (95%) for the CSA group (P = 0.71). Three patients died owing to cardiac events with functioning grafts. Acute rejection was 2 of 14 (14%) for the FK506 and 8 of 21 (38%) for the CSA group (P = 0.25). Two other patients on CSA were converted to FK506 as rescue for OKT3-resistant rejection. Mean serum cholesterol at 1 year was 198 +/- 45 mg/dL for the FK506 group and 244 +/- 49 mg/dL for the CSA group (P = 0.03). Mean serum creatinine at 1 year was 1.39 +/- 0.38 mg/dL for the FK506 group and 1.94 +/- 0.64 mg/dL for the CSA group (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Patient and graft survival were similar in both groups at 1 year posttransplant. Although statistically not significant, the incidence of acute rejection was lower in the FK506 group. Furthermore, FK506-treated patients had significantly lower serum creatinine and cholesterol levels at 1 year posttransplant.