Nasal provocation test in the diagnosis of natural rubber latex allergy

BACKGROUND: Natural rubber latex (NRL) allergy in workers using rubber gloves has been an occupational health problem for the last 10 years. In the case of the occupational agents, clinical history may be far from conclusive; hence, appropriate provocation should be carried out. The objective was to evaluate the usefulness of the nasal challenge test in the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis in subjects occupationally exposed to NRL. METHODS: A single-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted in 16 nurses with respiratory symptoms (bronchial asthma and/or rhinitis) related to NRL exposure as well as positive skin prick test (SPT) response to NRL. The controls were nine nurses with asthma and/or perennial rhinitis unrelated to NRL exposure; six atopic patients not occupationally exposed to NRL, with asthma and/or perennial rhinitis; and six healthy subjects. All the controls had negative results of SPT with NRL. Patients with a history of anaphylaxis or positive results of RAST to NRL were not considered in the study. The "nasal pool" technique was used to evaluate the cellular response and changes in protein level and ECP concentration in nasal washings after topical provocation with allergen or placebo. RESULTS: A significant increase was noted in eosinophil and basophil number, albumin/total protein ratio, and ECP level only in NRL SPT-positive patients subjected to nasal challenge with NRL. Neither bronchial nor systemic reactions were found after the nasal provocation with NRL. CONCLUSIONS: The nasal challenge test appears to be useful for diagnosing occupational rhinitis in NRL-sensitized patients.     

Increase of albumin, eosinophil cationic protein, histamine, leukotrienes and mast cell tryptase in nasal lavage fluid after challenge with inhalant allergen extract

Allergic rhinitis patients underwent nasal challenge with allergen extract. Before and up to 10 h after nasal provocation, nasal lavage was performed every hour. In about one-third of the patients a biphasic influx of albumin was observed: an initial increase of albumin within 30 min after provocation and a 2nd peak 6–8 h after provocation. Allergen-induced changes in histamine levels were less pronounced than those of albumin, but with some patients biphasic responses were also seen. Increased leukotriene formation mainly occurred within one hour after allergen provocation.From nasal washings of some patients, mast cell tryptase and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) were estimated. Whereas tryptase was released within one hour after nasal provocation, significant ECP release started 3 h later.     

Airway inflammation in asthma and perennial allergic rhinitis. Relationship with nonspecific bronchial responsiveness and maximal airway narrowing

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic airway inflammation is the hallmark of asthma, but it has also been reported in other conditions such as allergic rhinitis. We have tested whether the analysis of cells and chemicals in sputum can distinguish between patients with mild allergic asthma, those with allergic rhinitis, and healthy controls. The relationship between inflammation markers in sputum and nonspecific bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine (BHR) (PD20 and maximal response plateau [MRP] values) was also evaluated. METHODS: We selected 31 mild asthmatics and 15 rhinitis patients sensitized to house-dust mite. As a control group, we studied 10 healthy subjects. Every subject underwent the methacholine bronchial provocation test (M-BPT) and sputum induction. Blood eosinophils and serum ECP levels were measured. Sputum cell differentials were assessed, and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), tryptase, albumin, and interleukin (IL)-5 levels were measured in the entire sputum supernatant. RESULTS: Blood eosinophils and serum ECP levels were higher in asthma patients and rhinitis than in healthy controls, but no difference between asthma patients and rhinitis patients was found. Asthmatics had higher eosinophil counts and higher ECP and tryptase levels in sputum than rhinitis patients or control subjects. Sputum albumin levels were higher in asthmatics than in controls. Rhinitis patients exhibited higher sputum eosinophils than healthy controls. An association between sputum eosinophil numbers and MPR values (r= -0.57) was detected, and a trend toward correlation between sputum ECP levels and PD20 values (r= -0.47) was found in the rhinitis group, but not in asthmatics. No correlation between blood eosinophilic inflammation and lung functional indices was found. CONCLUSIONS: Induced sputum is an accurate method to study bronchial inflammation, allowing one to distinguish between rhinitis patients and mildly asthmatic patients. The fact that no relationship was detected between sputum inflammation and BHR suggests that other factors, such as airway remodeling, may be at least partly responsible for BHR in asthma.     

Vascular endothelial growth factor in allergen-induced nasal inflammation

Background Increased vessel number and permeability are important features of the nasal mucosa in allergic rhinitis (AR), and are mediated in part by the cytokine vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Eosinophils are the major effector cells in the nasal secretions of patients with AR during the responses to allergen challenges. To evaluate the involvement of VEGF in nasal allergic inflammation, we monitored the levels of VEGF, eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), and specific antibodies in the nasal lavage fluids (NLFs) of patients with AR in response to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus ( Dpt ).
Methods Sixty-three subjects with sensitization to Dpt were enrolled: 29 patients with AR (group I) who showed positive responses in a nasal provocation test (NPT) with Dpt ; and 34 asymptomatic controls (group II) who showed sensitization to Dpt but negative NPT results. NLF samples were collected at baseline, 10, 30, and 60 min, and at 3, 6, and 24 h during the NPT. The ECP levels in the NLF samples were measured using the ImmunoCAP system. VEGF and Dpt -specific IgE, IgA, and IgG in the NLF samples were detected by ELISA.
Results The eosinophil counts and ECP levels in the samples were significantly increased in group I, but not in group II, during the early and late responses. Although the baseline VEGF level was not significantly different between groups I and II, increased VEGF production was noted in group I after the NPT, especially during the early response. The level of Dpt -specific IgA was significantly increased in group I during the NPT. A relationship was found between the levels of VEGF and ECP or Dpt -specific IgA in the NLF samples collected at 10 min and at 3–6 h ( P <0.05, respectively).
Conclusion Nasal VEGF secretion in response to allergen exposure may augment eosinophilic inflammation in the nasal mucosa of patients with AR.     

Use of selected parameters of nasal lavage fluid in asthma severity monitoring

Allergic inflammation is a chronic disorder underlying asthma and allergic rhinitis. There is a theory "one system--one disease" connecting these two atopic diseases. Eosinophil is a major effector cell in both processes. The possible correlations between spirometric parameters and concentrations of selected mediators in peripheral blood and nasal lavage (NLF) fluid were estimated. 14 asthmatic patients entered the study, all of them symptoms free. In NLF supernatants and in blood ECP and sVCAM-1 concentrations were measured and cells in NLF were counted. RESULTS: Number of eosinophils in NLF correlated with sVCAM-1 concentration in NLF (R2 = 0.68; p < 0.05). In serum ECP and sVCAM-1 concentrations correlated with each other (R2 = 0.73; p < 0.05). Correlation between ECP concentration in serum or NLF and FEV1 was: R2ser = 0.49, R2NLF = 0.50 (p < 0.05), respectively. ECP concentration concentration correlated in serum and NLF correlated with MEF25: R2ser = 0.77, R2NLF = 0.45 (p < 0.05), and sVCAM-1 spirometric parameters: R2FEV1 = 0.26, R2MEF25 = 0.67, p < 0.05. CONCLUSION: VCAM-1 is active in selective eosinophil migration to peripheral tissue. It can also activate these cells. Concentration of ECP and sVCAM-1 in blood serum and NLF correlate with the course of bronchial asthma described by spirometric parameters, and therefore can be used in disease treatment monitoring.     

The value and safety of specific nasal provocation in the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis in mild persistent asthma under inhaled steroid therapy

Although specific nasal provocation is an objective diagnostic test for allergic rhinitis, it can also increase the lower airway responsiveness in asthmatic patients. Our goal was to determine the value and safety of specific nasal provocation test for the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis in mild persistent asthmatic patients under low-dose inhaled steroid therapy. The study was performed on 32 mild persistent, stable, mite-sensitive allergic asthmatics (group 1), 9 mild persistent nonallergic asthmatics (group 2) and 9 healthy non-smokers (group 3). Nasal symptoms were noted, paranasal sinus computerized tomography (PNCT) and rhinoscopic evaluations were performed. Cases with pathologic-anatomic changes in PNCT and rhinoscopy were excluded. Symptom scoring, flow-volume, peak expiratory flow (PEF), serum and nasal lavage eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and nasal lavage eosinophil counts were performed before mite specific nasal provocation test and at the 0th, 4th and 24th hours following the test. No adverse effects were observed in all diagnostic procedures. Total diagnostic value of nasal symptoms were found to be at 92%, while being 70% for rhinoscopy and 88% for specific nasal provocation test respectively in the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis in group 1. Statistically significant differences were found between basal nasal lavage eosinophil values (p < 0.001) and ECP levels (p < 0.05) when group 1 was compared with both group 2 and group 3. In the remaining measured values between three groups, no statistically significant differences were found. Specific nasal provocation test is a safe method for mild house dust mite allergic asthma cases under low-dose inhaled steroid therapy, but history of rhinitis might be sufficient for the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis.     

Involvement of eosinophils in the early-phase allergic reaction in a guinea pig rhinitis model

BACKGROUND: Eosinophils are found in the nasal lavage fluid (NLF) and nasal biopsies of patients with allergic rhinitis after a nasal antigen challenge, and associated not only with a late-phase allergic reaction (LPR) but also an early phase allergic reaction (EPR). Numerous studies have been carried out to clarify the participation of eosinophils in LPR or airway hyperresponsiveness. However, there has been no published report describing in detail the role of eosinophils during EPR. To better understand the involvement of eosinophils in EPR, we studied the effects of repeated antigen challenges on nasal airway responsiveness and eosinophilic inflammation in EPR using a guinea pig rhinitis model. METHODS: Nasal airway responsiveness was measured as the nasal airway resistance (NAR) after nasal antigen provocation. Eosinophilic inflammation during EPR was assessed by nasal lavage and histopathological examination using two groups of animals: those in group 1 were subjected to a sensitization pretreatment only, and those in group 2 were subjected to a pretreatment of sensitization followed by repeated nasal challenges. RESULTS: Repeated antigen challenges induced nasal hyperresponsiveness as indicated by a decrease in the antigen provocation dose and a significant increase in NAR. Furthermore, significant increases in eosinophil counts, eosinophil peroxidase (EPO) activity and protein content in NLF during EPR were observed following antigen provocation in group 2. There were significant correlations between the levels of these parameters, and albumin was the most prevalent of the proteins in NLF. Histopathological examination showed that the degree of eosinophil infiltration into the lamina propria of the nasal mucosa of the animals in group 2 was significantly and apparently higher than in group 1. Particularly, epithelial disruption and mucosal edema were significantly elevated after antigen provocation in group 2. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that chronic eosinophil accumulation is induced by repeated antigen challenges in the nasal tissue, and that once antigen provocation occurs, eosinophils in the tissue are activated and responsible for the amplification of EPR such as vascular permeability and mucosal edema.     

Serum eosinophil granule proteins predict asthma risk in allergic rhinitis

Background: Allergic rhinitis is a common disease, in which some patients will deteriorate or develop asthma. It is important to characterize these patients, thereby offering the possibility for prevention. This study evaluated eosinophil parameters as potential indicators of deteriorating allergic airway disease. Methods: The subjects of the study included all patients who suffered seasonal allergic rhinitis and had participated in a study 6 years earlier, in which blood eosinophils, serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) serum eosinophil peroxidase (EPO), nasal lavage ECP and nasal lavage EPO levels were measured. Patients in the present study were interviewed on occurrence of rhinitis symptoms during the last season, rhinitis outside season, asthma‐like symptoms and asthma diagnosis, and were skin‐prick tested for common aeroallergens. Eosinophil parameters from the study 6 years earlier were then tested for the ability to predict occurrence of new allergies, worsening of rhinitis and occurrence of asthma. Results: Forty‐four patients participated in the study. In four patients seasonal rhinitis symptoms had deteriorated, 10 had experienced perennial rhinitis symptoms, 14 reported asthma‐like symptoms and seven had been diagnosed with asthma. Thirteen had developed additional sensitization. Patients developing asthma‐like symptoms compared with patients with no such symptoms had significantly higher serum ECP (16.7 μg/l vs 8.2 μg/l; P ≤ 0.01) and serum EPO (17.9 μg/l vs 8.8 μg/l; P ≤ 0.05). Results were similar, considering patients diagnosed with asthma. Blood eosinophils and nasal lavage parameters were not related to development of asthma and asthma‐like symptoms. No eosinophil parameter was related to deterioration of rhinitis or additional sensitization. Conclusion: Serum ECP and EPO in patients with seasonal rhinitis demonstrated a high predictive ability for later development of asthma.     

Nasal lavage mediator profile and cellular composition of nasal brushing material during latex challenge tests

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that airborne latex allergens cause allergic rhinitis and bronchial asthma. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the association between the development of rhinitis reactions during workplace-related inhalative challenge tests and nasal allergic inflammation. METHODS: Thirty-two health care workers (HCWs) with suspected respiratory hypersensitivity to latex allergens underwent an inhalative workplace-related challenge test with powdered latex gloves. Nasal lavage fluid (NALF) and nasal brushing (NAB) material were collected before and after exposure (30 min, 2, 6 and 24 h) to determine mediator and cellular composition. In addition, lung function parameters and nasal flow were recorded. Furthermore, six healthy controls underwent nasal brushing and nasal lavage without latex allergen challenge at the same time intervals. RESULTS: Twenty-six HCWs showed acute rhinitis by contact to airborne latex allergen exposure and 10 of them had an additional asthma response. Only in responders, significantly increased eosinophil levels were found 6 h (P < 0.00001) and 24 h (P < 0.0005) post-challenge when compared with the prechallenge values. The ECP levels measured 2, 6 and 24 h post-challenge in the responder group were significantly elevated when compared with the prechallenge values as well as with the non-responders (6 h: P < 0.05, 24 h: P < 0.00001 afterwards). Only in some concentrated NALF samples of responders collected 30 min post-challenge (seven out of 15) tryptase concentration above the detection limit were found. The NO derivative concentrations in NALF were significantly increased 6 h post-challenge compared with the prechallenge values (P < 0.05) and were significantly higher in responders than in non-responders and in controls (P < 0.002). IL-5 levels increased post-challenge in the responder group with a pronounced effect 6 h after challenge (P < 0.001). Overall, a variety of parameters was significantly correlated (e.g. ECP with NO derivatives, r = 0.792 P < 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate for the first time that nasal and bronchial hyperreactivity to airborne latex allergens are associated with an increase of eosinophils and mediators (e.g. ECP, NO derivatives, IL-5, tryptase) in nasal mucosa. The combined use of NAB (for cells) and NALF (for mediators) appears to be a useful model to monitor nasal inflammation during workplace-related challenge tests.     

Sublingual tryptase and ECP in children treated with grass pollen sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT): safety and immunologic implications

BACKGROUND: The clinical safety of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) has been repeatedly confirmed; nevertheless, the possible onset of local oral symptoms is still a concern, and nothing is known about the pathogenesis of this effect. We aimed to determine whether the administration of SLIT in allergic children can evoke an IgE-mediated reaction, by measuring the levels of sublingual tryptase and ECP. METHODS: Thirty children (7-12 years old) with allergic rhinitis/asthma due to grass pollen were prescribed SLIT. In these children, an allergen-specific nasal challenge was performed, and nasal tryptase and ECP were measured before and after. Sublingual ECP and tryptase were also assessed before the SLIT, after 1 month, and after 6 months of treatment. Ten matched allergic children and 10 healthy ones served as controls for the baseline levels of sublingual ECP and tryptase. RESULTS: The levels of nasal tryptase and ECP significantly increased after nasal challenge (P<0.001), whereas no change during the SLIT course (at the beginning, after 1 month, and after 6 months) could be detected in sublingual tryptase either before or after SLIT administration. The sublingual ECP significantly decreased after 6 months of SLIT. The baseline levels of nasal tryptase and ECP were significantly higher in allergic subjects than in healthy controls, as was the level of sublingual ECP. CONCLUSIONS: In the presence of an IgE-mediated reaction (ASNC), a significant increase of tryptase and ECP can be seen. When SLIT is administered, such a phenomenon does not occur; therefore, SLIT does not elicit any IgE reaction in the mouth. It is noteworthy that allergic subjects display higher levels of nasal ECP and tryptase than healthy subjects, even when symptom-free, and these observations may indicate the presence of subclinical inflammation.     

Immediate and dual response to nasal challenge with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus in local allergic rhinitis

Background Local allergic rhinitis (LAR) is characterized by in situ production of specific IgE (sIgE) antibodies and a positive response to a nasal allergen provocation test (NAPT) in the absence of atopy. Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the immunological mechanisms involved in the immediate and late responses after nasal exposure to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (DP) in patients with LAR. Methods A total of 40 subjects with LAR to DP were studied and compared with 50 healthy controls. Immediate and late responses to NAPT‐DP were assessed using a visual analogue scale of nasal symptoms and acoustic rhinometry. Tryptase, ECP, total and sIgE‐DP were measured in the nasal lavage by immunoassay at baseline, 15 min, 1, 6 and 24 h after nasal challenge. Results NAPT‐DP was positive in all patients, with significant increases in tryptase (45%), ECP (65%) and sIgE‐DP (25%) (P<0.05). Sixty percent of the LAR patients presented an immediate response to NAPT‐DP and 40% a dual response. Immediate responders showed a fast release of tryptase with a peak at 15 min after NAPT‐DP, and a progressive increase in nasal ECP and sIgE‐DP from 1 to 24 h after challenge, with a peak at 24 h. Dual responders presented persistently higher levels of tryptase from 15 min to 6 h after challenge, and a similar pattern of nasal release of ECP and sIgE‐DP to immediate responders. There were no isolated late responders. NAPT‐DP was negative in all healthy controls, with no increases in tryptase, ECP, or total and sIgE‐DP in nasal secretions. Conclusions The results demonstrated the existence of immediate and dual responses to a NAPT with DP in LAR patients, with the local presence of sIgE and mast cell/eosinophil activation. Cite this as: S. López, C. Rondón, M. J. Torres, P. Campo, G. Canto, R. Fernandez, R. Garcia, A. Martínez‐Cañavate and M. Blanca, Clinical & Experimental Allergy, 2010 (40) 1007–1014.     

Repeatability and validity of cell and fluid-phase measurements in nasal fluid: a comparison of two methods of nasal lavage

BACKGROUND: There is little information on the repeatability of cell counts and fluid-phase measurements in nasal fluid obtained by different methods of nasal lavage. OBJECTIVE: To compare the repeatability and validity of total and differential cell counts and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) in nasal secretions obtained by two methods of nasal lavage. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twelve healthy subjects and twelve subjects with clinically stable allergic rhinitis were randomly assigned to two nasal lavages (separated by 48 h), by one of two methods in the first week and by the second method in the following week. One method was a modification of the method described by Greiff et al. and Grunberg and coworkers and the other was that described by Naclerio and coworkers. RESULTS: Both methods of nasal lavage gave poorly repeatable eosinophil counts and ECP in normal subjects but better repeatability in subjects with rhinitis. The modified Greiff/Grunberg method gave higher and more repeatable total cell count and, in subjects with rhinitis, more reproducible ECP levels compared with the Naclerio METHOD: Both methods were able to discriminate between healthy and rhinitic subjects: mean +/- SD eosinophil percentage count and eosinophil cationic protein differences were 4.5 +/- 4% (P < 0.05) and 24.5 +/- 46.9 microg/L (P < 0.05), respectively, with the modified method and 7.0 +/- 4% (P < 0.05) and 26.9 +/- 68 microg/L (P < 0.05), respectively, with the Naclerio method. CONCLUSION: Both methods are valid and discriminate between normal and rhinitic subjects. In subjects with rhinitis, although the repeatability of eosinophil counts is similar by both methods, the modified Greiff/Grunberg method gives more reproducible ECP measurements, compared with the Naclerio method.     

The upper and lower airway responses to nasal challenge with house-dust mite Blomia tropicalis

BACKGROUND: The house dust mite Blomia tropicalis (B. tropicalis) was found to be the most prevalent domestic mite in Singapore. However, its pathogenicity in allergic airway diseases remains to be investigated. METHODS: Twenty adults with persistent allergic rhinitis (PAR) were studied. Five had a history of asthma, and all were asymptomatic except one who was under treatment with low-dose inhaled corticosteroid. Nasal challenge was carried out by nasal spray with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and with increasing concentrations of crude B. tropicalis extracts (0.6, 6.0 and 60 micro g/ml) at 15 min intervals. Subjective symptom scores and absolute number of sneezes were recorded together with objective measurements of spirometry (forced expiratory volume in 1 s, FEV1) and acoustic rhinomanometry (volume of the nasal cavity). These were performed at baseline, 5 min after each incremental challenge, and 30 min, 1 h, 3 h, 5 h and 7 h after the last challenge. Meanwhile, concentrations of mediators in nasal secretions (tryptase, leukotriene C4 (LTC4) and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP)) were measured in nasal aspirate samples at similar time intervals. An identical (control) challenge procedure with PBS alone was repeated in seven patients after a washout period of at least 2 weeks. RESULTS: Significant increases in the subjective and objective nasal symptoms, together with a significant increase of tryptase and LTC4 concentrations in nasal secretion, were found 5 min after each challenge with B. tropicalis, but not with PBS. There was no definitive pattern of the late-phase nasal response in either subjective symptoms or objective measurements. Three patients (3/5) with a history of asthma showed a fall in FEV1 readings (33%, 22% and 11% from baseline, respectively) at 7 h post challenge with concomitant mild wheezing in the night. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates direct evidence of allergic nasal response to B. tropicalis in sensitized adults. It shows that nasal provocation may also provoke concomitant asthmatic symptoms during the late-phase reaction, especially in people with a history of asthma.     

Specific immunoglobulin E for staphylococcal enterotoxins in nasal polyps from patients with aspirin-intolerant asthma

BACKGROUND: Nasal polyps infiltrated with eosinophils are commonly found in chronic asthmatic patients, more frequently in those with aspirin-intolerant asthma (AIA) than aspirin-tolerant asthma (ATA). Some studies have suggested a contribution of superantigens derived from Staphylococcus sp to nasal polyposis and eosinophilia, but their relative importance in AIA and ATA subjects is unknown. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether local production of specific IgE to staphylococcal enterotoxins A and B (SEA and SEB) and relationships with markers of eosinophilic inflammation differ in the nasal polyps of AIA and ATA subjects. METHODS: Fifteen AIA subjects with positive responses to lysine-aspirin bronchoprovocation and 15 ATA subjects underwent polypectomy. Immunoassays were used to quantify eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), IL-5, mast cell tryptase, soluble IL-2 receptors (sIL-2R), total IgE, and specific IgE for SEA and SEB. RESULTS: ECP levels in nasal polyp homogenates were higher in AIA subjects than in ATA subjects (P < 0.02), with no significant differences in tryptase, IL-5 or sIL-2R. Total IgE, and specific IgE to both SEA and SEB, were detectable in some nasal polyps from both subject groups, but median levels were markedly higher in AIA subjects than in ATA subjects (P = 0.04, 0.01, 0.05, respectively). Levels of specific IgE to SEA and SEB correlated significantly with levels of ECP and IL-5, but not those of tryptase or sIL-2R. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that staphylococcal superantigens may drive local eosinophilic inflammation in nasal polyp tissue, and that this is exacerbated in subjects with AIA.     

Eosinophils are a feature of upper and lower airway pathology in non-atopic asthma, irrespective of the presence of rhinitis

BACKGROUND: Asthma and rhinitis often co-exist and there are data to suggest that they may be two ends of the same disease spectrum. Immunohistochemical studies have shown that eosinophilia in the airways is a feature of rhinitic patients without asthma. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to examine whether cellular infiltration exists in the nasal mucosa of asthmatics even in the absence of symptoms and signs of rhinitis. METHODS: Nasal mucosa biopsies were taken from 27 non-atopic subjects and comprised nine asthmatic rhinitic patients (AR), eight asthmatic non-rhinitic patients (ANR) and 10 healthy control subjects (N). Bronchial mucosa biopsies were also taken simultaneously from some of the patients (n = 10) to determine whether there was an association between cellular infiltration in the nose and the lungs. The alkaline phosphatase-anti-alkaline phosphatase (APAAP) method was used on 6 microm thick cryostat sections using monoclonal antibodies against T cells (CD4, CD8), eosinophils (EG2) and mast cells (mast cell tryptase). Slides were counted blind and results expressed as cells per field. RESULTS: The results showed that eosinophil counts were higher in both asthma groups compared with control nasal biopsies (median values AR 8.3, ANR 9.2, N 2.1 cells per field, P < 0.01). Furthermore, there was a significant correlation between eosinophil cell counts in the nose and the airways (r = 0.851 P < 0.001). No differences in eosinophil numbers were detected between the two groups of asthmatics. Also, no differences were noted for any other cell type (i.e. CD4, CD8, tryptase) among the three study groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that eosinophil infiltration was present in the nasal mucosa of asthmatic patients even in the absence of rhinitis, and add further support to the hypothesis that asthma and rhinitis are clinical expressions of the same disease entity.     

Occupational asthma in a grain worker due to Lepidoglyphus destructor, assessed by bronchial provocation test and induced sputum

BACKGROUND: Occupational asthma (OA) can be a debilitating disease even when removal from the workplace is achieved. Today, the "gold standard" in the assessment of OA is the bronchial provocation test (BPT). Induced sputum is a non-invasive method of exploring airway inflammation which can provide additional information about such challenges and thus could be applied in OA diagnosis and monitoring. METHODS: We report the study carried out in a grain worker sensitized to Lepidoglyphus destructor (Ld), who suffered from mild asthma at the workplace. Skin prick test and specific serum IgE were measured. Ld-BPT was performed, and the changes in eosinophil rates, and ECP and tryptase levels in induced sputum were studied 30 min and 18 h after Ld-BPT. We also determined the changes in nonspecific bronchial hyperresponsiveness (NSBH), given as PD20 values. To assess the specificity of the changes, we also carried out sputum induction and methacholine challenge after barley-BPT. RESULTS: An isolated immediate response was obtained with Ld-BPT, while barley-BPT was negative. Induced sputum showed higher tryptase levels 30 min after Ld-BPT, and higher eosinophil and epithelial cell percentages and ECP levels 18 h after Ld-BPT. There was also a decrease in methacholine PD20 values after Ld-BPT. Those changes were not observed after barley-BPT. CONCLUSIONS: The study of eosinophilic and mast-cell markers in induced sputum provides additional knowledge about the inflammatory process occurring in the airways, suggesting that the study of induced sputum should be considered in the assessment of OA.     

Allergic rhinitis to grass pollen: Measurement of inflammatory mediators of mast cell and eosinophils in native nasal fluid lavage and in serum out of and during pollen season

Background: In allergic rhinitis, mast cells, activated by cross-linking of allergen to mast cell–bound specific IgE, release both vasoactive mediators related to the early nasal symptoms and chemotactic mediators that attract inflammatory cells, such as eosinophils, related to the late-phase response. Objective: We have analyzed, during and out of pollen season, in blood and nasal fluid from patients allergic to grass pollen, histamine and tryptase to monitor the early phase markers and eosinophil and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) to monitor the late phase. Methods: Twenty patients were enrolled in the study. As a control, we studied 10 nonatopic subjects. Mediators and eosinophils were assessed in blood and nasal fluid. Histamine was tested only in nasal fluid. Results: During pollen season, tryptase but not histamine increased in nasal fluids from patients (2.96 vs 0.22 U/ml, p = 0.001) and correlated with symptom scores (r_s = 0.63, p = 0.003). Tryptase was not detected in serum. Eosinophils increased in nasal cytology (17.0% vs 2.0%, p = 0.001) and in the blood (26.5 vs 12.7 × 10⁶ L, p = 0.001) from patients, but they did not correlate with symptom scores. ECP increased only in the nasal lavage (16.33 vs 1.30 ng/ml, p = 0.001) and correlated with symptom scores (r_s = 0.53, p = 0.016). Conclusions: Both ECP and tryptase increase in nasal secretion in natural disease. Therefore the measurement of tryptase and ECP levels in nasal fluid might be a useful clinical test for monitoring disease activity and the effects of therapeutic agents. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 1997;100:832-7.)     

Occupational allergy caused by carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus).

BACKGROUND: Occupational respiratory symptoms caused by decorative flowers are seldom reported in the literature. In our area a large portion of the population works in carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus) winter quarters, and many workers have symptoms of rhinitis and asthma related to exposition. OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to investigate whether the symptoms induced by carnation were IgE-mediated and to study the possible allergens involved. METHODS: A total of 16 subjects employed in indoor carnation cultivation with symptoms during exposition time were studied along with 15 patients with allergic asthma who were not exposed to carnations and 15 healthy carnation workers used as control subjects. Skin prick tests with carnation extract and RASTs were performed. Protein bands were isolated by SDS-PAGE, and afterwards immunoblotting was performed to characterize the extract. Specific nasal provocation and nonspecific bronchial provocation tests were performed for all the asthmatic patients. Diurnal variation in peak expiratory flow was also measured. RESULTS: Skin prick test responses with carnation extract were positive in 15 of the 16 patients and negative in all control subjects. Nasal provocation test responses with carnation extract were positive in 13 of 16 patients. A significant correlation was seen between RAST and nasal provocation results (P <.01). Immunoblotting of sera from 13 patients showed 2 major IgE-binding fractions of 34 and 35 kd in most of the patients, which could constitute the major allergen. Methacholine PD20 showed a variable degree of nonspecific bronchial hyperresponsiveness in all asthmatic subjects. CONCLUSION: Data demonstrate the involvement of carnation in occupational allergy, mediated by an IgE-dependent mechanism.     

Nasal challenges with recombinant derivatives of the major birch pollen allergen Bet v 1 induce fewer symptoms and lower mediator release than rBet v 1 wild-type in patients with allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND: Genetic engineering of the major birch pollen allergen (Bet v 1) has led to the generation of recombinant Bet v 1 derivatives with markedly reduced IgE-binding capacity, but with retained T cell activating ability. OBJECTIVE: To compare the mucosal reactivity to rBet v 1 derivatives with rBet v 1 wild-type as basis for new therapeutic strategies for birch pollen allergy based on mucosal tolerance induction. METHODS: Outside the pollen season, 10 patients with birch pollen allergic rhinitis and mild asthma underwent four nasal challenge-sessions in a randomized, double-blind, and cross-over design, employing increasing doses of rBet v 1 fragment mix, rBet v 1 trimer, rBet v 1 wild-type and diluent (albumin). Nasal lavage fluids (NAL) were collected before the challenge-series as well as 10 min, 4 and 24 h thereafter. Nasal lavage fluid levels of tryptase as well as EPO and ECP were measured as indices of mast cell and eosinophil activity, respectively. RESULTS: All 10 patients tolerated the highest accumulated dose, 8.124 microg, when challenged with rBet v 1 trimer, eight with rBet v 1 fragments compared to one when challenged with rBet v 1 wild-type. No late phase reactions were observed. The change in tryptase levels (pre-challenge vs. 10 min) was significantly lower after challenges with rBet v 1 trimer and rBet v 1 fragments than with rBet v 1 wild-type. The change in EPO/ECP concentration pre-challenge versus 4 h post-challenge was lower for rBet v 1 trimer and the change was significantly lower when pre-challenge versus 24 h post-challenge to rBet v 1 fragments and rBet v 1 wild-type was examined. CONCLUSION: The derivatives induced significantly fewer symptoms and lower mast cell and eosinophil activation than rBet v 1 wild-type upon application to the nasal mucosa. They could in the future be candidates for immunotherapy based on mucosal tolerance induction.     

Allergen-induced inflammation in the nose: a comparison of acute and repeated low-dose allergen exposure

To investigate allergic rhinitis induced by two experimental provocation models, we compared local inflammation with markers of eosinophil activity in peripheral blood. Patients with strictly seasonal allergic rhinitis were selected and investigated outside the pollen season. An acute challenge with increasing doses of allergen every 15 min until symptoms occurred was performed in nine patients. Nasal lavage and blood samples were taken before and 4 and 24 h after challenge. After a 6-week washout period, 10 patients were submitted to 7 days of repeated low allergen exposures. One small dose (∼ 1/100 of the acute dose) was given each day. Blood and lavage samples were taken prior to and after the period. As control four patients were challenged with diluent only. The acute challenge resulted in sneezing and nasal discharge and blockage and was accompanied by a rise in histamine and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) in lavage fluid after 4 h and continuing after 24 h, when there also was a rise in the number of eosinophils and ECP in peripheral blood. The repeated low-dose exposures caused very few symptoms but produced increased ECP in the lavage fluid and a trend toward increased histamine concentration. There were no changes in ECP, intracellular EG2 binding, or number of eosinophils in the blood. No changes were seen in the control group. Our findings show that changes in eosinophil mediator release in nasal lavage can be seen after very low, but repeated, allergen exposures despite no, or minimal, clinical symptoms.