Pancreaticojejunostomy without stent (with video)

There is a high risk of anastomotic leakage following pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy or middle pancreatectomy in patients with a normal soft pancreas because of the abundant exocrine function. Therefore, pancreaticojejunostomy is generally performed using a stent tube (stented method). However, pancreaticojejunostomy with a certain duct-to-mucosa anastomosis does not always require a stent tube even in patients with a normal soft pancreas. We have performed pancreaticojejunostomy with duct-to-mucosa anastomosis without a stent tube (nonstented method) and obtained good results. The objective of this technique is to maintain adequate patency of the anastomosis using a fine atraumatic needle and monofilament suture. The pancreas, including the pancreatic duct, is sharply transected with a scalpel. Any arterial bleeding points on the pancreatic cut end are repaired with fine nonabsorbable sutures. The end-to-side anastomosis between the pancreas and jejunum consists of two layers of sutures. The outer layer is composed of the capsular parenchyma of the pancreas and the jejunal seromuscularis, and the inner layer is composed of the pancreatic duct with an adequate pancreatic parenchyma and the whole jejunal wall. Complete pancreaticojejunostomy using duct-to-mucosa anastomosis does not require a stent tube. This nonstented method can be considered one of the basic procedures for pancreaticojejunostomy because of its safety and reliability.     

Binding pancreaticojejunostomy--a safe and reliable anastomosis procedure

BackgroundOver the past one hundred years, the development of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has always involved the struggle against pancreatic leakage. Until now, leakage of the pancreatic anastomosis has remained a common and serious complication after PD. Various methods of dealing with the pancreatic stump for prevention of pancreatic anastomotic leakage have been described. No matter which method is used, however, pancreatic anastomotic leakage is still most likely to occur when anastomosis involves a normal and soft pancreas.MethodsTo perform a safe and reliable pancreaticoenteric anastomosis, we investigated the risk factors and potential mechanisms of occurrence of pancreatic leakage, including leakage from the needle hole and from the seam between two anastomosed structures, blood supply to the anastomosis and tension at the anastomosis. Based on these findings, we established a new pancreaticoenteric anastomosis procedure – binding pancreaticojejunostomy. The unique aspects of this procedure are as follows. The sero-muscular sheath of jejunum is bound to the invaginated pancreatic stump, so as to seal the gap between them; mucosa of the segment of jejunum that would eventually be in contact with the pancreatic stump is destroyed either chemically or by electric coagulation to promote healing. There is no needle hole on the jejunal surface of the anastomotic site.ResultsFrom 1996 to 2003, a total of 227 consecutive patients were treated with this type of pancreaticojejunostomy in this institution. None of the patients developed a pancreatic anastomotic leak.DiscussionBinding pancreaticojejunostomy is a safe and reliable anastomotic procedure to effectively minimize leakage even when the texture of the pancreas is soft and normal.     

Pancreaticogastrostomy: a pancreas-transfixing method with duct-to-mucosa anastomosis (with video)

Pancreatic fistula still remains a persistent problem after pancreaticoduodenectomy. We have devised a pancreas-transfixing suture method of pancreaticogastrostomy with duct-to-mucosa anastomosis. This technique is simple and reduces the risk of pancreatic leakage by decreasing the risk of suture injury of the pancreas and by embedding the transected stump into the wall of the stomach. This novel technique of pancreaticogastrostomy is an effective reconstructive procedure following pancreaticoduodenectomy, especially for patients with a soft and fragile pancreas.     

A retrospective comparative study of reconstructive methods following pancreaticoduodenectomy--pancreaticojejunostomy vs. pancreaticogastrostomy.

Reconstructive methods following pancreaticoduodenectomy in our department are discussed and evaluated in this study. Between January 1980 and November 1990 fifty-two consecutive patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy because of pancreas head disease. Thirty-one patients underwent pancreaticojejunostomy and twenty-one had pancreaticogastrostomy as reconstructive procedures. Mortality rate was 6% in pancreaticojejunstomy versus zero in pancreaticogastrostomy. Six patients had leakage from the pancreaticojejunostomy, but only one patient had necrosis of the gastric stump and leakage from the pancreaticogastrostomy. This case had previous distal gastrectomy done for gastric ulcer. The residual stomach might not have been large enough, and the blood supply of the gastric stump might not have been adequate for pancreaticogastrostomy. Except for this case, none was observed with leakage from the pancreatic anastomosis in the pancreaticogastrostomy group. No statistical significance in operating time or blood loss was observed between the two methods. The pancreaticogastrostomy cases without complications had significantly less loss of body weight than those with pancreaticojejunostomy at the date of discharge (p < 0.05). It is concluded that pancreaticogastrostomy is the safer reconstructive method following pancreaticoduodenectomy, although it may not be indicated in patients with prior gastrectomy.     

Modified pancreatic invagination into the jejunum with a double intestinal segment--a new technique.

A new technique for pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy, Nagakawa's modified pancreatic invagination with a double intestinal segment, is described: in this method a double intestinal segment is prepared by an automatic instrument and the stump of the pancreas is invaginated into it. Suture of the stump of the pancreas and the jejunum is performed using a technique previously developed by the author. It is hoped that this technique will be widely applicable in pancreatic surgery.     

An easier method for performing a pancreaticojejunostomy for the soft pancreas using a fast-absorbable suture

AIM： To clarify the usefulness of a new method for performing a pancreaticojejunostomy by using a fast-absorbable suture material irradiated polyglactin 910, and a temporary stent tube for a narrow pancreatic duct with a soft pancreatic texture.METHODS： Among 63 consecutive patients with soft pancreas undergoing a pancreaticoduodenectomy from 2003 to 2006, 35 patients were treated with a new reconstructive method. Briefly, after the pancreatic transaction, a stent tube was inserted into the lumen of the pancreatic duct and ligated with it by a fast-absorbable suture. Another tip of the stent tube was introduced into the intestinal lumen at the jejunal limb, where a purse-string suture was made by another fast-absorbable suture to roughly fix the tube. The pancreaticojejunostomy was completed by ligating two fast-absorbable sutures to approximate the ductal end and the jejunal mucosa, and by adding a rough anastomosis between the pancreatic parenchyma and the seromuscular layer of the jejunum. The initial surgical results with this method were retrospectively compared with those of the 28 patients treated with conventional duct-to-mucosa anastomosis.RESULTS： The incidences of postoperative morbidity including pancreatic fistula were comparable between the two groups （new; 3%-17% vs conventional; 7%-14% according to the definitions）. There was no mortality and re-admission. Late complications were also rarely seen.CONCLUSION： A pancreaticojejunostomy using an irradiated polyglactin 910 suture material and a temporary stent is easy to perform and is feasible even in cases with a narrow pancreatic duct and a normal soft pancreas.     

Comparative study of anastomosis in pancreaticogastrostomy and pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The relative advantages of pancreaticojejunostomy and pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy remain to be established. To clarify differences between the two procedures, we examined 66 patients who underwent PD and compared clinical and histological parameters, surgical records and patient outcomes. METHODOLOGY: In this retrospective study, subjects were divided into a pancreaticojejunostomy group (n=48) and a pancreaticogastrostomy group (n=18). Pancreaticogastrostomy and pancreaticojejunostomy were performed using invagination technique and end-to-side anastomosis, respectively. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in patient demographics and surgical records between the two groups. Increases in serum amylase concentrations after operation were significantly greater in the pancreaticogastrostomy group (902 +/- 915 IU/L) than in the pancreaticojejunostomy group (326 +/- 761 IU/L) (p = 0.025). However, there were no significant differences in other postoperative laboratory data or complications between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, the clinical and safety data associated with pancreaticojejunostomy and pancreaticogastrostomy procedures for anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy were almost similar. Therefore, the anastomotic procedure used should depend on the surgeon's choice or the distance between the remnant stomach and pancreas.     

A new technique for pancreaticogastrostomy for the soft pancreas: the transfixing suture method

Background/Purpose

Pancreatic anastomotic leakage remains a persistent problem after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). The presence of soft, nonfibrotic pancreatic tissue is one of the most important risk factors for pancreatic leakage. Accordingly, we devised a pancreas-transfixing suture method for pancreaticogastrostomies in patients with a soft, nonfibrotic pancreatic remnant.

Methods

The pancreas-transfixing method was applied in 103 consecutive patients after either standard PD (49 patients) or pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) (54 patients) for malignant or benign disease. Of these 103 patients, 65 had a soft, nonfibrotic pancreatic remnant. For the pancreaticogastrostomy technique, an ultrasonically activated scalpel was used for transecting the pancreas. The inner layer involves a duct-to-mucosa anastomosis with an internal stent and the outer layer involves a single row of pancreas-transfixing sutures between the pancreatic remnant and the posterior gastric wall.

Results

Operative mortality was zero and morbidity was 22%. Only two patients (2%) developed pancreatic leaks; both resolved nonoperatively with the continuation of closed drainage.

Conclusions

This technique is simple and appears to reduce the risk of pancreatic leakage, possibly by decreasing the risk of suture injury of the pancreas and by embedding the transected stump into the wall of the stomach. This novel pancreaticogastrostomy technique is an effective reconstructive procedure, especially for patients with a soft, nonfibrotic pancreas.     

Reconstruction method after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Idea to prevent serious complications

Pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy represents a critical trigger of potentially life-threatening complications and is also associated with markedly prolonged hospitalization. Many arguments have been proposed for the method to anastomosis the pancreatic stump with the gastrointestinal tract, such as invagination vs. duct-to-mucosa, Billroth I (Imanaga) vs. Billroth II (Whipple and/or Child) or pancreaticogastrostomy vs. pancreaticojejunostomy. Although the best method for dealing with the pancreatic stump after pancreaticoduodenectomy remains in question, recent reports described the invagination method to decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula significantly compared to the duct-to-mucosa anastomosis. In Billroth I reconstruction, more frequent anastomotic failure has been reported, and disadvantages of pancreaticogastrostomy have been identified, including an increased incidence of delayed gastric emptying and of pancreatic duct obstruction due to overgrowth by the gastric mucosa. We review recent several safety trials and methods of treating the pancreatic stump after pancreaticoduodenectomy, and demonstrate an operative procedure with its advantage of the novel reconstruction method due to our experiences.     

Choice of the optimal pancreaticojejunal anastomosis technique: how can we improve patient safety in pancreatic surgery?

Background/Purpose

The cause of the morbidity and mortality following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in the surgical treatment of benign and malignant diseases of the periampullary region is leakage from the pancreaticojejunal anastomosis. The size of the main pancreatic duct and the texture of the remnant pancreas are very important factors for a secure pancreaticojejunal anastomosis.

Methods

A new technique was developed for patients having pancreatic ducts smaller than 3 mm and a hard remnant pancreas.

Results

Pylorus-preserving PD was performed for 28 patients who underwent PD at our hospital between January 2004 and January 2007, without mortality. The new technique was used in the 8 patients who had pancreatic ducts smaller than 3 mm and a hard remnant pancreas. With our new technique, different from other previously described techniques, the anastomosis was performed with the sutures passing from the cut-surface of the parenchyma of the pancreas. All patients were operated on by the same surgeon and surgical team. None of the patients developed a fistula.

Conclusions

We believe that this anastomosis technique can be performed securely in patients having a hard remnant pancreas and a main pancreatic duct smaller than 3 mm.

     

Dunking pancreaticojejunostomy versus duct-to-mucosa anastomosis

Following the resectional aspect of pancreaticoduodenectomy, three anastomoses are used to reestablish gastrointestinal continuity. The pancreatic?Centeric anastomosis is by far the most problematic, and has been considered by many the Achilles heel of the pancreaticoduodenal resection. Multiple clinical trials have been published focusing on improving outcomes of the pancreatic?Centeric anastomosis, including elements such as the use of prophylactic octreotide, the use of sealants, stenting of the pancreatic duct, and surgical technique. There are two widely used methods to accomplish an end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) after pancreaticoduodenectomy: either invagination PJ or duct-to-mucosa PJ. Two prospective randomized trials have evaluated these techniques, the first a trial by Bassi and co-authors, and the second a trial by Berger et al. In this article we will focus on our current technique for both invagination pancreaticojejunostomy and duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy, recognizing that careful surgical technique, surgeon experience, and surgical volume are factors that are important in yielding the best outcomes.     

Pancreaticojejunostomy using duct-to-mucosa anastomosis without a stenting tube

Background Purpose

There is a high risk of anastomotic leakage after pancreaticojejunostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with a normal soft pancreas because of the high degree of exocrine function. Therefore, pancreaticojejunostomy is generally performed using a stenting tube (stented method). However, pancreaticojejunostomy with a certain duct-to-mucosa anastomosis does not always require a stenting tube, even in patients with a normal soft pancreas. Recently, we have performed pancreaticojejunostomy with duct-to-mucosa anastomosis without a stenting tube (nonstented method) and obtained good results.

Methods

The point of this technique is to maintain adequate patency of the anastomosis using a fine atraumatic needle and monofilament thread. The results of end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy of the normal soft pancreas using the nonstented method (n = 123) were compared with those using the stented method (n = 45).

Results

There were no differences in background characteristics between the groups, including age, gender, and disease. The mean times to complete pancreaticojejunostomy were around 30?min in the two groups and the rates of morbidity and leakage of pancreaticojejunostomy were 26.8% and 5.7% in the nonstented group and 22.2% and 6.7% in the stented group, respectively. These differences were not statistically significant. One patient in the stented group died of sepsis following leakage of pancreaticojejunostomy. There were also no significant differences in the mean time to initiation of solid food intake or postoperative hospital stay.

Conclusions

In conclusion, complete pancreaticojejunostomy using duct-to-mucosa anastomosis for a normal soft pancreas does not require a stenting tube. This nonstented method can be considered one of the basic procedures for pancreaticojejunostomy because of its safety and certainty.     

Open pancreatic stenting with duct-to-mucosa anastomosis for pancreatic-duct obstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy

Pancreatic-duct dilatation is frequently observed in the patients who have undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Pancreaticodigestive anastomotic stricture may occasionally develop after PD. Stenosis of the pancreaticoenterostomy induces obstructive chronic pancreatitis, which occurs due to primary stenosis or obstruction of the main pancreatic duct and causes in inflammation of the distal pancreas. The patency of the pancreaticoenterostomy is one of the most important factors affecting the functioning of the remnant pancreas and the quality of life. Endoscopic dilatation is one of the treatment options for stenosis of pancreaticogastrostomy (PG). However, the failure of endoscopic dilatation necessitates surgical approaches. We have described our technique of open pancreatic stenting with a duct-to-mucosa anastomosis for a case which the stenosis of PG could not be resolved by endoscopic dilatation. This technique dose not require re-resected PG or side-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy: the risk of anastomotic leakage is quite low and the procedure is minimally invasive.     

Delayed massive arterial hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer. Management of a life-threatening complication

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Delayed massive arterial hemorrhage from the operating field occurs in 1-4% of cases after pancreaticoduodenectomy, with a mortality rate up to 50%. The purpose of this study was to define diagnostic and treatment methodologies to maximize survival. METHODOLOGY: Between 1990 and 1999, 84 pancreaticoduodenectomies were performed for periampullary and pancreatic head cancer. After surgery, massive bleeding occurred in two patients (2.3%), 30 and 8 days after resection, respectively. RESULTS: Pancreatic leak and disruption of the pancreaticojejunostomy were reported in both cases. Bleeding was controlled by suture ligation of the stump of the gastroduodenal artery. Completion pancreatectomy and a new pancreaticojejunostomy were respectively performed. Hemorrhage recurred in both cases from a ruptured pseudoaneurysm of the hepatic artery, requiring re-exploration and surgical ligation. The first patient died of re-bleeding despite completion pancreatectomy, the other survived after oversewing the residual pancreatic stump at re-exploration. CONCLUSIONS: Early diagnosis and management of pancreatic leak represents the only means to prevent a delayed massive arterial hemorrhage. Transarterial embolization or surgical ligation of the hepatic artery proximal to the celiac axis represents the procedure of choice to control the bleeding. Taking down the pancreatic anastomosis and oversewing the pancreatic stump is safe and effective. Extensive drainage of the operating field should always be associated to prevent multisystem organ failure.     

Stenting is unnecessary in duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy even in the normal pancreas

Background: There is a high risk of anastomotic leakage after pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in patients with a normal pancreas because of the high degree of exocrine function. These PD are therefore generally performed using a stenting tube (stented method). In recent years, we have performed pancreaticojejunostomy with duct-to-mucosa anastomosis without a stenting tube (nonstented method) and obtained good results. Methods: The point of this technique is to preserve adequate patency of the pancreatic duct by carefully picking up the pancreatic duct wall with a fine atraumatic needle and monofilament thread. The results of end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy of the normal pancreas were compared between the nonstented method (n = 109) and the stented method (n = 39). Results: There were no differences in background characteristics between the groups, including age, gender and disease. The mean duration to complete pancreati-cojejunostomy was 26.6 min in the nonstented group and 29.2 min in the stented group. The mean durations of surgical procedure and intraoperative blood loss were also similar in the groups. Morbidity rates due to early postoperative complications were 20.2 and 23.1%, with pancreatic leakage occurring in 7.3 and 7.7% of patients, respectively. These differences were not statistically significant. One patient in the stented group died of sepsis following leakage of pancreaticojejunostomy. There were also no significant differences in the mean time to initiation of solid food intake or postoperative hospital stay. Conclusion: We conclude that a stenting tube is unnecessary if the duct-to-mucosa anastomosis is completely performed. This operative technique can be considered a basic procedure for pancreaticojejunostomy because of the low risk.     

Mattress sutures for the modification of end-to-end dunking pancreaticojejunostomy

Despite the improvement of surgical techniques, the rate of anastomotic failure of pancreaticojejunostomy remains high (30%–50%). Here we describe the use of vertical mattress sutures in the modification of dunking pancreaticojejunal anastomosis. In 7 patients who used this technique, neither anastomotic failure nor any major postsurgical complication developed. This technique is an easy, safe, and promising for the performance of pancreaticojejunostomy.     

A novel reconstructive procedure after pancreaticoduodenectomy: J-pouch dunking pancreaticojejunostomy

Leakage of the pancreaticojejunostomy remains a major complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Several methods have been advocated in order to reduce anastomotic fistula but none of them reached a significant difference in preventing the leakage. We developed a new technique called "J-pouch dunking pancreaticojejunostomy". A "J" pouch is made from the distal 20 to 30 cm of jejunum by using a GIA linear stapler. A transverse incision is made on the jejunal base. As a result, we have enough jejunal stoma to anastomose the pancreatic remnant. A soft pancreas and small pancreatic size are known to be risk factors in pancreatic anastomosis. This technique is designed to eliminate the several factors related to pancreatic anastomotic leakage.     

胰十二指肠切除术胰管-黏膜端侧吻合法的临床应用

目的 探讨胰十二指肠切除术中应用胰管一黏膜端侧吻合法的效果及安全性.方法 回顾性分析2001年1月至2009年1月应用胰管-黏膜端侧吻合法的189例胰十二指肠切除术患者的胰瘘及其他并发症发生率.胰漏的诊断标准为:手术后7 d腹腔引流液淀粉酶测定值大于血中淀粉酶水平3倍以上,每日引流量＞50 ml.结果 行常规胰十二指肠切除术(Whipple)177例,保留幽门胰十二指肠切除术(PPPD)12例.本组5例发生胰瘘,发生率为2.65%(5/189).其中3例为轻度胰瘘,经保守治疗痊愈,另2例经再次手术痊愈.其他并发症包括切口感染9例(4.76%,9/189)、胃排空障碍11例(5.82%,11/189)、腹腔或胃肠吻合口出血5例(2.65%,5/189)和腹腔感染4例(2.12%,4/189).2例分别死于术后腹腔严重感染和急性肺梗死.结论 胰管-黏膜端侧胰肠吻合法较接近生理状态,胰瘘及残端出血的发生率较低,适合各种胰腺残端的吻合术.     

Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy

Background/Purpose

In the majority of reports morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy remains high and leakage from the pancreatic stump still accounts for the majority of surgical complications. Many technical modifications of the pancreaticoenteric anastomosis to decrease the pancreatic leakage rate have been suggested.

Methods

A Medline search for surgical guidelines, prospective randomized controlled trials, systematic meta-analyses, and clinical results was performed with regard to technical aspects of reconstruction, i.e., pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy, after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Here we illustrate the different approaches to reconstruction, with an emphasis on technical aspects and their details.

Conclusions

Pancreaticojejunostomy appears to be the most widely performed reconstruction, but pancreaticogastrostomy is a reasonable alternative. However, in the analysis of the clinical results it is important to know which specific pancreaticoenteric anastomosis is considered; for example, end-to-end, dunking, invagination of the pancreatic stump, or duct-to-mucosa. It is hoped that collaborative trials will provide high-level data to allow tailoring of the operative technique, depending on the risk factors for pancreatic leakage in any particular patient.     

家猪贯穿缝合式胰肠吻合实验模型的建立

目的 建立家猪贯穿缝合式胰肠吻合的动物实验模型.方法 选取10头小型家猪,全麻后剖腹暴露胰腺,于胰腺左叶肠系膜上血管水平横断胰腺,胰腺近侧残端缝闭,远侧残端与空肠行端侧贯穿缝合式胰肠吻合,Roux-en-Y式重建消化道.结果 10头家猪行贯穿缝合式胰肠吻合手术均获成功.胰腺残端横径平均2.5 cm,胰管直径平均1.5 mm.手术时间为1.0～2.5 h,平均1.8h,其中胰肠吻合时间平均为8 min.术中平均出血量为25 ml.术后2头猪发生腹泻,1头猪发生切口感染,均经相应处理后治愈.术中未发生意外,术后未发生胰瘘,无死亡.结论 成功建立家猪贯穿缝合式胰肠吻合的实验模型.