首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 40 毫秒
1.
The perception of action is associated with increased activity in motor regions, implicating such regions in the recognition, understanding and imitation of actions. We examined the possibility that perception of speech, both auditory and visual, would also result in changes in the excitability of the motor system underlying speech production. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was applied to the face area of primary motor cortex to elicit motor-evoked potentials in the lip muscles. The size of the motor-evoked potentials was compared under the following conditions: listening to speech, listening to non-verbal sounds, viewing speech-related lip movements, and viewing eye and brow movements. Compared to control conditions, listening to and viewing speech enhanced the size of the motor-evoked potential. This effect was only seen in response to stimulation of the left hemisphere; stimulation of the right hemisphere produced no changes in motor-evoked potentials in any of the conditions. In a control experiment, the size of the motor-evoked potentials elicited in the muscles of the right hand did not differ among conditions, suggesting that speech-related changes in excitability are specific to the lip muscles. These results provide evidence that both auditory and visual speech perception facilitate the excitability of the motor system involved in speech production.  相似文献   

2.
OBJECTIVE: To establish the triple stimulation technique (TST) for recordings from the first dorsal interosseus (FDI) and the abductor pollicis brevis muscles (APB), and to analyse the test-retest repeatability of the TST measurements in APB. METHODS: The recently developed TST was slightly modified for recordings from small hand muscles to account for volume conducted activity from surrounding muscles. The TST combines transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with a peripheral collision technique [Magistris et al. Brain 121 (1998) 437]. In contrast to conventional motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), it quantifies the number of conducting central motor neurons (expressed by the TST amplitude ratio, TST-AR). MEPs and TST were performed in 30 sides of 25 healthy subjects (target muscle FDI), and in 29 sides of 21 healthy subjects (target muscle APB). All APB recordings were repeated after 25+/-5.9 days. RESULTS: The TST-AR averaged 97.4+/-2.5% in FDI and 95.9+/-4.7% in APB. There was a mean difference of the TST-AR ratio of 2.9+/-3.1% between the repeated APB recordings (95% limits of agreement+/-6.3%). CONCLUSIONS: TMS allows activation of virtually all motor neurons supplying FDI and APB, when effects of volume conduction are eliminated. Its test-retest repeatability is excellent. SIGNIFICANCE: The TST is well suited for follow-up examinations of central motor conduction failures. The greater number of established target muscles widens its clinical applicability.  相似文献   

3.
《Clinical neurophysiology》2014,125(2):320-326
ObjectiveTheta-burst stimulation (TBS) is a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) protocol, capable of enhancing or suppressing the amplitude of contralateral motor-evoked potentials (MEP) for several minutes after stimulation over the primary motor cortex. Continuous TBS (cTBS) produces a long-term depression (LTD)-like reduction of cortical excitability. The purpose of this study was to assess the test–retest reproducibility of the effects of cTBS and to investigate which neurophysiologic markers of cTBS-induced plasticity are most reproducible.MethodsIn ten healthy participants we evaluated in two different sessions the effects of cTBS (using AP–PA current direction, opposite to most commercial rTMS stimulators) on MEPs induced by single-pulse suprathreshold TMS (using AP–PA or PA current direction) over left motor cortex in the first dorsal interosseus (FDI) muscle.ResultsResults demonstrate that the marker of cTBS induced-plasticity with highest within-subject reproducibility is the modulation of corticospinal excitability measured 5 min after cTBS.ConclusionOverall the effects of cTBS modulation show limited test–retest reproducibility and some measures of the cTBS effects are more reproducible than others.SignificanceStudies comparing cTBS effects in healthy subjects and patients need to proceed with care. Further characterization of the effects of TBS and identification of the best metrics warrant future studies.  相似文献   

4.
Summary Multiple non-invasive methods of imaging brain function are now available for presurgical planning and neurobiological research. As these new methods become available, it is important to understand their relative advantages and liabilities, as well as how the information gained compares across different methods. A current and future trend in neurobiological studies as well as presurgical planning is to combine information from different imaging techniques. Multi-modal integration may perhaps give more powerful information than each modality alone, especially when one of the methods is transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), with its ability to non-invasively activate the brain. As an initial venture in cross comparing new imaging methods, we performed the following 2 studies, locating motor cortex with echoplanar BOLD fMRI and TMS. The two methods can be readily integrated, with concurring results, although each have important limitations.  相似文献   

5.
Noninvasive brain stimulation has been demonstrated to modulate cortical activity in humans. In particular, theta burst stimulation (TBS) has gained notable attention due to its ability to induce lasting physiological changes after short stimulation durations. The present study aimed to provide a comprehensive meta-analytic review of the efficacy of two TBS paradigms; intermittent (iTBS) and continuous (cTBS), on corticospinal excitability in healthy individuals. Literature searches yielded a total of 87 studies adhering to the inclusion criteria. iTBS yielded moderately large MEP increases lasting up to 30 min with a pooled SMD of 0.71 (p < 0.00001). cTBS produced a reduction in MEP amplitudes lasting up to 60 min, with the largest effect size seen at 5 min post stimulation (SMD = −0.9, P < 0.00001). The collected studies were of heterogeneous nature, and a series of tests conducted indicated a degree of publication bias. No significant change in SICI and ICF was observed, with exception to decrease in SICI with cTBS at the early time point (SMD = 0.42, P = 0.00036). The results also highlight several factors contributing to TBS efficacy, including the number of pulses, frequency of stimulation and BDNF polymorphisms. Further research investigating optimal TBS stimulation parameters, particularly for iTBS, is needed in order for these paradigms to be successfully translated into clinical settings.  相似文献   

6.

Objective

To examine the effect of priming paired associative stimulation (PAS) on the modulation of motor cortex (M1) plasticity in young and old adults.

Methods

Fifteen young (20–27 yrs) and 15 old (61–79 yrs) subjects participated in 3 experimental sessions, with each session involving two consecutive PAS protocols separated by 10 mins. The first (priming) protocol was either PASLTP (ISI = N20 latency + 2 ms), PASLTD (ISI = N20 latency ? 10 ms), or PASControl (ISI = 100 ms), whereas the second (test) protocol was always PASLTP. Changes in M1 excitability were assessed from motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in a hand muscle.

Results

In young subjects, MEPs were larger after PASLTP + PASLTP than PASLTD + PASLTP (P < 0.0001) and PASControl + PASLTP (P = 0.0008), whereas the response to PASControl + PASLTP was not different to PASLTD + PASLTP (P = 0.3). In old subjects, MEPs were smaller after PASLTP + PASLTP compared with PASControl + PASLTP (P = 0.02), whereas PASLTD + PASLTP was similar to PASControl + PASLTP (P = 0.08). Age-related comparisons within each priming condition showed that the response to PASLTP + PASLTP was significantly greater in young subjects (P = 0.03).

Conclusion

Data show that priming with PASLTP was effective in young but not old subjects.

Significance

These findings suggest a limited utility of priming PAS for augmenting plasticity induction in old adults.  相似文献   

7.

Background

When single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is applied over the primary motor cortex (M1) with sufficient intensity, it evokes muscular contractions (motor-evoked potentials, MEPs) and muscle twitches (TMS-evoked movements). Participants may also report various hand sensations related to TMS, but the perception elicited by TMS and its relationship to MEPs and evoked movements has not been systematically studied.

Objective

The main aim of this work is to evaluate participants' kinesthetic and somatosensory hand perceptions elicited by single-pulse TMS over M1-hand area at different intensities of stimulation and their relation with MEPs and TMS-evoked movements.

Methods

We compared the number of MEPs (measured by electromyography), TMS-evoked movements (measured by an accelerometer) and participants' hand perception (measured by verbal report) elicited by TMS at different intensity of stimulation. This way, we estimated the amplitude of MEPs and the acceleration of TMS-evoked movements sufficient to trigger TMS evoked hand perceptions.

Results

We found that TMS-evoked hand perceptions are induced at 105% of the individual resting motor threshold, a value significantly different from the threshold inducing MEPs (about 100%) and TMS-evoked movements (about 110%). Our data indicate that only MEPs with an amplitude higher than 0.62 mV and TMS-evoked movements with acceleration higher than 0.42 m/s2 were associated with hand perceptions at threshold.

Conclusions

Our data reveal the main features of TMS-evoked hand perception and show that in addition to MEPs and TMS-evoked movements, this is a separate discernible response associated to single-pulse TMS over M1.  相似文献   

8.
The present study evaluates motor functional recovery after C2 spinal cord hemisection with or without contralateral brachial root transection, which causes a condition that is similar to the crossed phrenic phenomenon on rats. Descending motor pathways, including the reticulospinal extrapyramidal tract and corticospinal pyramidal tracts, were evaluated by transcranial magnetic motor-evoked potentials (mMEPs) and direct cortical electrical motor-evoked potentials (eMEP), respectively. All MEPs recorded from the left forelimb were abolished immediately after the left C2 hemisection. Left mMEPs recovered dramatically immediately after contralateral right brachial root transection. Corticospinal eMEPs never recovered, regardless of transection. The facilitation of mMEPs in animals that had undergone combined contralateral root transection was well correlated with open-field behavioral motor performance. Both electrophysiological and neurological facilitations were significantly attenuated by the selective serotonin synthesis inhibitor para-chlorophenylalanine (p-CPA). These results suggest that serotonergic reticulospinal fibers located contralateral to hemisection contribute to the behavioral and electrophysiological improvement that immediately follows spinal cord injury (SCI).  相似文献   

9.
《Brain stimulation》2014,7(2):260-268
BackgroundTheta burst stimulation (TBS) is a pattern of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation that has been demonstrated to facilitate or suppress human corticospinal excitability when applied intermittently (iTBS) or continuously (cTBS), respectively. While the fundamental pattern of TBS, consisting of bursts of 50 Hz stimulation repeated at a 5 Hz theta frequency, induces synaptic plasticity in animals and in vitro preparations, the relationship between TBS and underlying cortical firing patterns in the human cortex has not been elucidated.ObjectiveTo compare the effects of 5 Hz iTBS and cTBS with individualized TBS paradigms on corticospinal excitability and intracortical inhibitory circuits.MethodsParticipants received standard and individualized iTBS (iTBS 5; iTBS I) and cTBS (cTBS 5; cTBS I), and sham TBS, in a randomised design. For individualized paradigms, the 5 Hz theta component of the TBS pattern was replaced by the dominant cortical frequency (4–16 Hz; upper frequency restricted by technical limitations) for each individual.ResultsWe report that iTBS 5 and iTBS I both significantly facilitated motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude to a similar extent. Unexpectedly, cTBS 5 and cTBS I failed to suppress MEP amplitude. None of the active TBS protocols had any significant effects on intracortical circuits when compared with sham TBS.ConclusionIn summary, iTBS facilitated MEP amplitude, an effect that was not improved by individualizing the theta component of the TBS pattern, while cTBS, a reportedly inhibitory paradigm, produced no change, or facilitation of MEP amplitude in our hands.  相似文献   

10.
OBJECTIVES: In order to learn more about the physiology of the motor cortex during motor imagery, we evaluated the changes in excitability of two different hand muscle representations in the primary motor cortex (M1) of both hemispheres during two imagery conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We applied focal transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over each M1, recording motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from the contralateral abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and first dorsal interosseus (FDI) muscles during rest, imagery of contralateral thumb abduction (C-APB), and imagery of ipsilateral thumb abduction (I-APB). We obtained measures of motor threshold (MT), MEP recruitment curve (MEP-rc) and F waves. RESULTS: Motor imagery compared with rest significantly decreased the MT and increased MEPs amplitude at stimulation intensities clearly above MT in condition C-APB, but not in condition I-APB. These effects were not significantly different between right and left hemisphere. MEPs simultaneously recorded from the FDI, which was not involved in the task, did not show facilitatory effects. There were no significant changes in F wave amplitude during motor imagery compared with rest. CONCLUSIONS: Imagery of unilateral simple movements is associated with increased excitability only of a highly specific representation in the contralateral M1 and does not differ between hemispheres.  相似文献   

11.
《Brain stimulation》2019,12(4):1027-1040
BackgroundMotor imagery (MI) engages cortical areas in the human brain similar to motor practice. Corticospinal excitability (CSE) is facilitated during but not after MI practice. We hypothesized that lasting CSE changes could be achieved by associatively pairing this endogenous modulation with exogenous stimulation of the same intracortical circuits.MethodsWe combined MI with a disinhibition protocol (DIS) targeting intracortical circuits by paired-pulse repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in one main and three subsequent experiments. The follow-up experiments were applied to increase effects, e.g., by individualizing inter-stimulus intervals, adding neuromuscular stimulation and expanding the intervention period. CSE was captured during (online) and after (offline) the interventions via input-output changes and cortical maps of motor evoked potentials. A total of 35 healthy subjects (mean age 26.1 ± 2.6 years, 20 females) participated in this study.ResultsA short intervention (48 stimuli within ∼90s) increased CSE. This plasticity developed rapidly, was associative (with MIon, but not MIoff or REST) and persisted beyond the intervention period. Follow-up experiments revealed the relevance of individualizing inter-stimulus intervals and of consistent inter-burst periods for online and offline effects, respectively. Expanding this combined MI/DIS intervention to 480 stimuli amplified the sustainability of CSE changes. When concurrent neuromuscular electrical stimulation was applied, the plasticity induction was cancelled.ConclusionsThis novel associative stimulation protocol augmented plasticity induction in the human motor cortex within a remarkably short period of time and in the absence of active movements. The combination of endogenous and exogenous disinhibition of intracortical circuits may provide a therapeutic backdoor when active movements are no longer possible, e.g., for hand paralysis after stroke.  相似文献   

12.
Summary Different physiological mechanisms of facilitation of latencies and amplitudes of magnetic motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were evaluated in a cohort of 140 healthy volunteers. The potentials were induced at the vertex and recorded at the abductor pollicis brevis. The aim of the present investigation was to compare physiological mechanisms which presumably facilitate motor pathways at the cortical level with those known to occur during contraction of small hand muscles. When compared with MEPs at rest, the maximum average decrease of latencies (1.5, SD 1.1 ms) as well as the highest increase of peak to peak amplitudes (2.6, SD 2.1 mV) was observed during exertion of a voluntary background force, at the muscle recorded from. Pre-innervation of a neighbouring muscle (abductor digiti minimi) led to a lesser average decrease of latencies by 1.0, SD 1.1 ms and an average increase of amplitudes by only 0.5, SD 1.5 mV. Non-specific manoeuvres, like sticking out the tongue or counting aloud, reduced mean latencies slightly by 0.4 ms, SD 0.8 ms and 0.3 SD 0.85 ms respectively, but increased amplitudes markedly by an average of 1.0, SD 1.6 mV and 0.8, SD 1.4mV respectively. It is concluded that facilitation of MEPs by non-specific manoeuvres occurs and must be taken into account when evaluating MEPs.  相似文献   

13.
帕金森病患者运动皮质兴奋性的经颅磁刺激研究   总被引:4,自引:0,他引:4  
目的:本研究拟应用低频重复性经颅磁刺激(rTMS)分别刺激帕金森病(PD)患者M1手代表区(M1Hand)及运动前区(PMC),探讨不同干预手段对运动皮质兴奋性的影响,以及M1与PMC间的联系。方法:对18名确诊PD患者先后进行4种不同干预,即口服美多芭、低频rTMS刺激M1Hand(0.5Hz,100%静息阈值,共1600次脉冲)、低频rTMS刺激PMC(0.5Hz,100%静息阈值,共1600次脉冲)以及假刺激。于每次干预前后各进行临床评价并测定运动诱发电位(MEP)相关指标。结果:①口服美多芭后UPDRSⅢ(P=0.001)以及其中有关僵直(P=0.001)、运动迟缓(P<0.001)的评分均较服药前显著改善。三种不同磁刺激干预产生结果不同,M1Hand组UPDRSⅢ减低(P=0.015),僵直(P=0.010)、运动迟缓(P=0.004)亦有所改善;PMC组UPDRSⅢ较干预前减低(P=0.046),僵直评分亦减低,但无显著性意义(P=0.163);②口服美多芭1h后MEP120减低(P=0.002),CSP延长(P=0.006);M1Hand组MEP120无著变,而CSP延长(P=0.015);PMC组MEP120减低(P=0.004),而CSP无著变;假刺激组则均无显著性改变。结论:低频rTMS对不同脑区产生的效应不同:刺激M1可使CSP延长;而刺激PMC可使MEP波幅减低。  相似文献   

14.
《Clinical neurophysiology》2021,132(5):1151-1156
ObjectiveMotor surround inhibition (mSI) is a physiological mechanism that contributes to hand movement control by focusing voluntary movement. Growing evidence suggests that hand movement control is impaired in multiple sclerosis. The aim of the study was to evaluate mSI in MS and to investigate the brain structures involved in mSI in multiple sclerosis.MethodsWe recruited 33 patients and 23 controls. To investigate mSI, we delivered transcranial magnetic single pulses during index finger flexion. Motor evoked potentials were recorded and first dorsal interosseous (“active muscle”) and from the abductor digiti minimi (“surround muscle”). mSI was expressed as the ratio between Motor evoked potentials recorded from the surround muscle during movement and at rest. Participants underwent a magnetic resonance study.ResultsPatients had impaired mSI as compared with controls. Magnetic resonance showed that basal ganglia had smaller volumes and higher mean diffusivity than controls. Impaired mSI correlated with primary motor cortex and basal ganglia involvement in multiple sclerosis.ConclusionAltered mSI in multiple sclerosis is related to cortical and subcortical grey matter involvement.SignificanceOur study provides the first demonstration of a pathophysiological mechanism underlying hand movement control dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. mSI represents a new therapeutic target of multiple sclerosis rehabilitative approaches.  相似文献   

15.
《Brain stimulation》2020,13(3):675-682
ObjectivesTranscranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is a new technology that is extensively used for migraine treatment. The present study aims to examine the effectiveness of cathodal-tDCS (c-tDCS) in decreasing migraine pain frequency, duration, and intensity at the right primary motor cortex (M1) or sensory cortex (S1) in individuals with episodic or chronic migraine.MethodsThe present study has a randomized, single-blind, and sham-controlled design. It tests the effectiveness of 22 sessions of c-tDCS (20min/1000 μA) in 45 migraine patients (episodic = 35; chronic = 10/with aura = 28; without aura = 17). Spread over 10 consecutive weeks, the sessions started with three sessions per week and ended with one session per week. Participants were tested at the baseline, at the end of intervention, and at 12-month follow-up. The migraine diagnosis was based on criteria set by International Headache Society (IHS) and patients were allocated to two experimental (nm1 = 15; ns1 = 15) and a sham intervention group (nc = 15).ResultsThe results of a series of MANCOVAs showed a significant reduction (p < 0.05) in all hypothesized symptoms of migraine pain in both experimental groups compared to the sham intervention group at the posttest and follow-up.ConclusionThe application of c-tDCS to M1 or S1 can be used as a technological intervention for the prophylactic and therapeutic treatment of episodic or chronic migraine.Ethical committee registration numberIr.mums.fm.rec.1396.362.  相似文献   

16.
Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is a non-invasive method of brain stimulation that modulates oscillatory neural activity in the cortical area under the electrodes. Gamma (γ)-tACS applied over the primary motor cortex (M1) and cerebellar hemisphere is known to improve motor performance; however, it is not yet known whether it affects motor learning. Thus, here we investigated whether γ-tACS applied over the M1 and cerebellar hemisphere affects motor learning. This study involved 30 healthy subjects (14 females, 16 males) performing a visuomotor control task (eight trials) during an administration of either γ-tACS or a sham stimulation (15 subjects per condition) over their right M1 and left cerebellar hemisphere. Each subject performed five trials after 24 h. The motor learning efficiency, motor learning retention and re-motor learning efficiency in each condition were compared. The motor learning retention in the γ-tACS condition was significantly higher than that in the sham condition (p = 0.031). Thus, subjects who were administered γ-tACS maintained their motor performance the next day better than sham-stimulated subjects. There was no significant difference between the conditions in the motor learning efficiency and those in the re-motor learning efficiency. Our results demonstrate that γ-tACS administered over the M1 and cerebellar hemisphere during a motor learning task can enhance motor learning retention.  相似文献   

17.
18.

Background

Measurements and models of current flow in the brain during transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) indicate stimulation of regions in-between electrodes. Moreover, the folded cortex results in local fluctuations in current flow intensity and direction, and animal studies suggest current flow direction relative to cortical columns determines response to tDCS.

Methods

Here we test this idea by using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Motor Evoked Potentials (TMS-MEP) to measure changes in corticospinal excitability following tDCS applied with electrodes aligned orthogonal (across) or parallel to M1 in the central sulcus.

Results

Current flow models predicted that the orthogonal electrode montage produces consistently oriented current across the hand region of M1 that flows along cortical columns, while the parallel electrode montage produces non-uniform current directions across the M1 cortical surface. We find that orthogonal, but not parallel, orientated tDCS modulates TMS-MEPs. We also show modulation is sensitive to the orientation of the TMS coil (PA or AP), which is thought to select different afferent pathways to M1.

Conclusions

Our results are consistent with tDCS producing directionally specific neuromodulation in brain regions in-between electrodes, but shows nuanced changes in excitability that are presumably current direction relative to column and axon pathway specific. We suggest that the direction of current flow through cortical target regions should be considered for targeting and dose-control of tDCS.  相似文献   

19.
Several methods can be used to determine the resting motor threshold (RMT) and by that recording transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) induced motor evoked potentials (MEPs). However, no research has compared the test retest reliability of these methods. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine intra‐ and inter‐session reliability of Rossini–Rothwell (R–R) and parameter estimation by sequential testing (PEST) methods on TMS‐induced MEPs and comparison of these two methods on RMT. Twelve healthy individuals participated in this study three times (T1, T2 and T3) over two days. TMS was applied using both R–R and PEST to estimate RMT and average of 25 MEPs were acquired at each of the three time points. The intra‐class correlation coefficient indicated high intra‐session reliability in the MEP amplitudes for both methods (0.79 and 0.88, R–R and PEST respectively). The RMT and MEP amplitudes had higher inter‐session reliability in both methods (0.99 and 0.998, R–R and PEST respectively; 0.84 and 0.76, R–R and PEST respectively). There was no significant difference between methods for RMT at both T1 (maximum stimulator output of R–R vs. PEST, 33.7% ± 7.7% vs. 33.8% ± 7.6%, p = 0.75) and T3 (maximum stimulator output of R–R vs. PEST, 33.5% ± 7.3% vs. 33.7% ± 7.3%, p = 0.19). There was a significant positive correlation between the methods' estimates of RMT, with PEST requiring significantly fewer stimuli. This study shows that the R–R and PEST methods have high intra‐and inter‐session reliability and the same precision, with PEST having the advantage over R–R in speed of estimation of RMT.  相似文献   

20.
Abstract

To clarify the topographical relationship between peri-Rolandic lesions and the central sulcus, we carried out presurgical functional mapping by using magnetoencephalography (MEG), functional magnetic resonance imaging (f-MRI), and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) on 5 patients. The sensory cortex was identified by somatosensory evoked magnetic fields using MEG (magnetic source imaging (MSI)). The motor area of the hand region was identified using f-MRI, during a hand squeezing task. In addition, transcranial magnetic stimulation localized the hand motor area on the scalp, which was mapped onto the MRI. In all cases, the sensory cortical vein or the lack of any functional activation in the area of peri-lesional edema. MEPs were also unable to localize the entire motor strip. Therefore, at present, MSI is considered to be the most reliable method to localize peri-Rolandic lesions. [Neurol Res 1995; 17: 361-367] cortical vein or the lack of any functional activation in the area of peri-lesional edema. MEPs were also unable to localize the entire motor strip. Therefore, at present, MSI is considered to be the most reliable method to localize peri-Rolandic lesions. [Neurol Res 1995; 17: 361-367]  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号