Mineral fiber concentration in lung tissue of mesothelioma patients in Finland

The mineral fibers in lung tissue samples of 19 mesothelioma patients and 15 randomly selected autopsy cases were analyzed using low-temperature ashing, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and x-ray microanalysis. The fiber concentration ranged from 0.5 to 370 million fibers per gram of dry tissue in the mesothelioma group and from less than 0.01 to 3.2 million fibers per gram of dry tissue in the autopsy group. In 80% of the mesothelioma patients and in 20% of the autopsy cases, the fiber concentration exceeded 1 million fibers per gram of dry tissue. Amphibole asbestos fibers predominated in both groups, and only a few chrysotile fibers were found. In the lungs of six mesothelioma patients, anthophyllite was the main fiber type. The overall analytical precision of sample preparation and fiber counting with SEM was 22%.     

Occupational asbestos exposure among respiratory cancer patients in Lithuania

BACKGROUND: Despite intensive use of asbestos, no cancer case has ever been diagnosed as asbestos related in Lithuania. This paper attempts to estimate the proportion of those occupationally exposed to asbestos among respiratory cancer patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Occupational exposure to asbestos was assessed retrospectively for 298 lung cancer and four mesothelioma patients, admitted to the Institute of Oncology, Vilnius. The evaluation was based on personal interview data using an internationally established questionnaire covering most likely activities of asbestos exposure at the workplace. Cumulative exposure to asbestos at work was estimated in fiber years. Lung tissue asbestos fiber burden analysis was conducted by scanning transmission electron microscopy on 23 samples. RESULTS: A cumulative asbestos exposure of > or =25 fiber years was found for 10 lung cancer patients (3.4%). They worked in foundries, construction, installation, shipyard, power plant, railway, asbestos cement, glass and chemical industry. In a further 56 lung cancer patients (18.8%) and for one (25%) mesothelioma patient, a cumulative exposure from 5 to 24.9 fiber years was assessed. Asbestos fibers were detected in 18 cases, the burden ranged from 0.1 to 4.1 million fibers/g dry lung tissue; concentrations exceeding 1 million f/g dry lung tissue were found in four cases. All fibers were chrysotile. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that a fraction (3.4%) of the lung cancer cases could be attributed to heavy occupational exposure to asbestos using the Helsinki criterion of > or =25 fiber years. Therefore, approximately 50 lung cancer cases per year in Lithuania could be asbestos-related compensable occupational diseases.     

Occupational exposure to asbestos as evaluated from work histories and analysis of lung tissues from patients with mesothelioma

The past occupational exposure to asbestos of 23 patients with mesothelioma (21 men and two women) has been evaluated by a personal interview of their work history and by determination of the fibre burden in their lung tissue with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and x ray microanalysis. According to the work history, nine patients (39%) had definitely been or probably been exposed to asbestos, six patients (26%) had had possible exposures, and eight patients (35%) unlikely or unknown exposure to asbestos. The two female patients were in the unknown exposure category. The fibre concentrations in the patients' lung tissue ranged from less than 0.1 million to 370 million fibres (f) per g dry tissue. Concentrations of over one million f per g dry tissue were found in 15 patients (65%). The lung fibre concentrations of all nine male office workers analysed for reference were less than one million f per g dry tissue. Seventy eight per cent of the patients with mesothelioma had at least possible exposure according to their history of work or concentrations of more than one million f per g dry tissue.     

Inorganic fibres in the lung tissue of Hungarian and German lung cancer patients

Objective: To ascertain the lung burden of asbestos fibres in Hungarian lung cancer patients in comparison with the cumulative asbestos exposure estimated from the occupational history. Methods: For 25 Hungarian lung cancer patients, lung tissue fibre analysis was performed by scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) and counting of ferruginous bodies (FBs) by light microscopy. Cumulative asbestos exposure in fibre-years was assessed from a standardised occupational history using the report “fibre years” of the German Berufsgenossenschaften. Results: Median and maximum concentrations of fibres longer 5 μm per gram dry lung tissue (g dry) were 0.03 and 7.38 million fibres/g dry for chrysotile, 0.00 and 0.21 million fibres/g dry for amphibole and 0.22 and 0.62 million fibres/g dry for other mineral fibres (OMFs). The maximum values were observed in one patient for whom a high asbestos exposure was evident in advance from the occupational history. Conclusions: In comparison with reference values obtained by the same method for German patients with no indication of workplace asbestos exposure, increased concentrations of more than 0.2 million chrysotile fibres/g dry were obtained for six of the 25 Hungarian patients (24%). For one of them, the second highest estimate of a workplace exposure of 60 fibre-years and the highest tissue concentration of 7.38 million chrysotile fibres/g dry substantiate a high probability of a causal relationship to asbestos. A further comparison can be made with the results for 66 German patients treated by surgical lung resection for a disorder other than mesothelioma, mainly lung cancer. For the Hungarian lung cancer patients, similar amounts of chrysotile but distinctly lower amounts of amphibole fibres and distinctly higher amounts of OMFs were observed. A correlation between exposure estimates from occupational history and concentration of fibres in the lung tissue was observed for amphibole (Spearman: R=0.66, P < 0.001, Pearson: R=0.50, P=0.01) and for chrysotile (Pearson: R=0.48, P=0.02). Received: 3 May 2000 / Accepted: 14 September 2000     

Occupational exposure to asbestos as evaluated from work histories and analysis of lung tissues from patients with mesothelioma.

The past occupational exposure to asbestos of 23 patients with mesothelioma (21 men and two women) has been evaluated by a personal interview of their work history and by determination of the fibre burden in their lung tissue with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and x ray microanalysis. According to the work history, nine patients (39%) had definitely been or probably been exposed to asbestos, six patients (26%) had had possible exposures, and eight patients (35%) unlikely or unknown exposure to asbestos. The two female patients were in the unknown exposure category. The fibre concentrations in the patients' lung tissue ranged from less than 0.1 million to 370 million fibres (f) per g dry tissue. Concentrations of over one million f per g dry tissue were found in 15 patients (65%). The lung fibre concentrations of all nine male office workers analysed for reference were less than one million f per g dry tissue. Seventy eight per cent of the patients with mesothelioma had at least possible exposure according to their history of work or concentrations of more than one million f per g dry tissue.     

Relative risk of mesothelioma associated with different levels of exposure to asbestos.

The relative risk of mesothelioma associated with different levels of exposure to asbestos was evaluated. The exposure was assessed from work histories of 51 mesothelioma cases and 51 sarcoidosis referents. The lung fiber concentration of the mesothelioma patients was compared with that of two reference groups (13 random autopsy cases and 43 male lung cancer patients). When the categories definite and probable were used as an estimated probability of occupational exposure, an odds ratio of 17.7 [90% confidence interval (90% CI) 3.4-253] and 3.0 (90% CI 0.9-10.6), respectively, was obtained. A lung fiber concentration of greater than 1 million fibers/g of dry tissue as an indicator of accumulated exposure gave an odds ratio of 14.4 (90% CI 2.5-178) for the men in comparison with the autopsy cases and 3.1 (90% CI, 1.3-7.5) in comparison with the lung cancer patients. Elevated risk of mesothelioma was shown to be associated with a lung fiber concentration of greater than 1 million fibers/g of dry tissue.     

Fibrous minerals in the lungs of mesothelioma patients: comparison between data on SEM, TEM, and personal interview information.

To determine and compare the fiber types and size distributions in the lung tissue of mesothelioma patients in Finland, samples from 29 patients with known work history were analyzed with transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and X-ray microanalysis. Compared with the earlier results using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), the fiber concentrations were about three times as high and ranged from 0.1 million to 5,200 million fibers per gram of dry tissue. In 15 patients (52%), crocidolite/amosite were the dominating fiber types, representing more than 70% of all fibers. Anthophyllite asbestos was the most prevalent fiber type in eight patients (28%), and it was found in the samples of 13 patients (45%). One-half of the anthophyllite fibers were longer than 5 microns, whereas other fiber types were somewhat smaller.     

Asbestos content of lung tissue and carcinoma of the lung: a clinicopathologic correlation and mineral fiber analysis of 234 cases

The aim of this study was to investigate the asbestos content of lung tissue in a series of patients with lung cancer and some history of asbestos exposure. This information was then correlated with demographic information, occupational and smoking history, presence or absence of pathologic asbestosis or pleural plaques, and pathologic features of the cancer. The pulmonary concentration of asbestos fibers in 234 cases of primary carcinoma of the lung was determined by means of a tissue digestion technique. Asbestos body counts were performed in 229 cases and fiber analysis by scanning electron microscopy in 221 cases. Asbestos content was recorded as total asbestos fibers, commercial amphibole fibers, noncommercial amphibole fibers, and chrysotile fibers 5 microm or greater in length per gram of wet lung tissue. The study group included 70 patients with asbestosis (Group I), 44 patients with parietal pleural plaques but without asbestosis (Group II), and 120 patients with neither (Group III). The median asbestos body content of Group I was more than 35 times greater than Group II and more than 300 times greater than Group III. The total asbestos fiber count for Group I was nearly 20 times greater than Group II and more than 50 times greater than Group III. The difference was due almost entirely to commercial amphiboles.In a series of primary lung cancer cases with some history of asbestos exposure, a markedly elevated asbestos content was identified among those with pathologic asbestosis as compared with patients with pleural plaques alone or with neither plaques nor asbestosis.     

Evaluation and application of a plasma ashing method for STEM fiber analysis in human lung tissue

A preparation technique for fiber analysis in human lung tissue has been developed that involves freeze-drying and low-temperature ashing. Analysis is made in the analytical scanning transmission electron microscope at a magnification of 10,000 x. With the use of a special counting method, the sensitivity is approximately 80,000 fibers per gram dry tissue with lengths less than 5 microns and 40,000 fibers per gram dry tissue with lengths greater than or equal to 5 microns. In spite of the leaching and contamination effects described in the literature--even for chrysotile fibrils taken from the lung, elemental spectra do not differ essentially from the asbestos standard. In order to carry out a complete check of the preparation method, a suspension of standard crocidolite fibers in water was gelatinated. No changes in length, diameter or aspect ratio distribution occurred. After preparation, at least 40% of the fibers were recovered. Compared to the wide range of fiber concentrations observed in human lung tissue, these recovery rates appear adequate for fiber analysis in lung dust for medical or legal purposes. To date, 70 lung dust specimens have been analyzed. These are discussed in the paper.     

Occupational exposure and regional variation of malignant mesothelioma in Norway, 1970-79

This investigation is based on a study of 117 men and 24 women with malignant mesothelioma registered by the Cancer Registry of Norway, 1970-79. The age-adjusted incidence rate in men for each county varied from 1.7 to 13.3 per million per year. Eighty-two percent of the men revealed possible occupational asbestos exposure. They were evenly distributed between counties with high and low mesothelioma incidence. Only 17% of the women had possible occupational asbestos exposure. Total lung fiber concentration was analyzed with scanning electron microscopy in 65 men and 13 women. The median lung fiber concentration in men was 2.4 million per gram of dried tissue (range less than 0.4-490), in women 1.0 million per gram (range less than 0.4-41), and in male controls less than 0.4 million per gram (range less than 0.4-4.8). The median year of first exposure was 1937 (range 1909-60) for men from counties with a high incidence rate and 1945 (range 1938-59) for men from counties with a low incidence rate. The counties with a high compared to a low incidence rate of malignant mesothelioma, 1970-79, showed an apparent difference in the percentage of population employed in industry in 1946. The regional variation in the incidence of malignant mesothelioma in men is mainly attributable to the proportion of population exposed to asbestos in industry per county prior the 1950s and the time since exposure started.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Lung asbestos burden in shipyard and construction workers with mesothelioma: comparison with burdens in subjects with asbestosis or lung cancer

Although mesothelioma is generally considered to be caused by asbestos, epidemiologic studies indicate that some cases have another cause. In order to determine whether pulmonary asbestos burden can be used to define asbestos-related mesotheliomas, asbestos burden was quantified in 27 shipyard or construction workers with diffuse malignant mesothelioma of the pleura or peritoneum and a history of asbestos exposure. Their burden was significantly greater than the burden found in 19 unexposed men (P less than 0.001). The burdens were also compared to those of previously reported subjects with asbestosis or lung cancer. The median concentration for total amphibole fibers (2.7 million/g dry lung) in subjects with mesothelioma did not differ significantly from our previously reported median values for 14 subjects with asbestosis (1.3 million/g dry lung) or for 60 asbestos workers with lung cancer (1.3 million/g dry lung). Fiber size distribution for amosite, the most prevalent fiber type, was similar in all three subject groups. Fifteen of 25 (60%) subjects with mesothelioma had mild asbestosis. Asbestos body (AB) concentrations were greater than or equal to 1900/g dry lung, and total amphibole fiber concentrations were greater than or equal to 390,000/g dry lung. Counts of ABs greater than or equal to 0.5/cm2 in histologic sections always signified both of these concentrations in extracts. Thus, histologic sections showing greater than or equal to 0.5 ABs/cm2 or extracts containing asbestos body or amphibole fiber concentrations of at least 1900 or 390,000/g dry lung, respectively, will confirm an asbestos-related mesothelioma.     

Asbestos exposure and ovarian fiber burden

Epidemiologic studies suggest increased risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in female asbestos workers and increased risk of malignancy in general in household contacts of asbestos workers. Ovaries were studied from 13 women with household contact with men with documented asbestos exposure and from 17 women undergoing incidental oophorectomy. Ovarian tissue was examined by analytic electron microscopy. Significant asbestos fiber burdens were detected in 9 out of 13 women with household asbestos exposure (69.2%), and in 6 out of 17 women who gave no exposure history (35%). Three exposed women had asbestos counts over 1 million fibers per gram wet weight (23%), but only 1/17 women without an exposure history had a count that high (6%). Although asbestos has been documented as a contaminant of some older cosmetic talc preparations, the chrysotile and crocidolite types of asbestos we detected are more indicative of background and/or occupational exposure. This study demonstrates that asbestos can reach the ovary. Although the number of subjects is small, asbestos appears to be present in ovarian tissue more frequently and in higher amounts in women with a documentable exposure history. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Asbestos tissue burden study on human malignant mesothelioma

Asbestos fibers in the lung and mesothelial tissues (mesotheliomatous tissue and hyaline plaque) taken from 151 human malignant mesothelioma cases were identified and characterized by high resolution analytical electron microscopy. Asbestos fibers were present in almost all of the lung tissue as well as in the mesothelial tissue. The most common asbestos types seen in the lung were an admixture of chrysotile with amphiboles followed by amphiboles alone and chrysotile alone. The majority of asbestos types seen in the mesothelial tissues were chrysotile alone, followed by chrysotile plus amphibole and amphibole alone. A disproportion of asbestos types between the lung and mesothelial tissues was frequently observed. The most common pattern of the disproportion was chrysotile plus amphibole(s) in the lung and chrysotile only in the mesothelial tissues, followed by amphibole(s) in the lung and chrysotile only in the mesothelial tissues. Such a disproportion was considered to have been caused by chrysotile fiber's strong capacity to translocate from the lung to mesothelial tissues. The number of asbestos fibers in the lung was 456.4 x 10(6) fibers/dry gram in maximum, 0.08 x 106 fibers/dry gram in minimum and 105 x 10(6) fibers/dry gram on average; in the mesothelial tissues it was 240.0 x 106 fibers/dry gram in maximum, 0.03 x 106 fibers/dry gram in minimum and 49.84 x 106 fibers/dry gram on average. These numbers were greater than those seen in the general population. The majority of asbestos fibers detected in the lung and mesothelial tissues were shorter than 5 microm in length. Asbestos fibers fit to Stanton's hypothetical dimensions (> or =8.0 microm in length and < or =0.25 microm in diameter) were only 4.0%, since the majority of these fibers were shorter (<8 microm) and thinner (<0.25 microm) fibers. We concluded that such short, thin asbestos fibers should not be excluded from those contributing to the induction of human malignant mesothelioma. The present study supports that chrysotile asbestos can induce human malignant mesothelioma, since, in some of the mesothelioma cases, asbestos fibers detected in both the lung and mesothelial tissues, or lung tissue alone or mesothelial tissues alone were exclusively chrysotile fibers.     

Environmental and occupational exposures to chrysotile asbestos: a comparative microanalytic study

Previous light microscopic analysis of lung tissue from persons living close to a large open-pit asbestos mine demonstrated asbestos body counts intermediate between those of referents and those of miners and millers. In this study, we examined via electron microscopy and x-ray energy dispersive spectrometry autopsy lung specimens from individuals ascertained to be environmentally or occupationally exposed and from a referent group. Environmental group concentrations of chrysotile fibers longer than 5 microns were significantly higher than those of referents, and 50% lower than those observed in the occupational group. Tremolite was markedly increased in the occupational group, but only marginally greater in the environmentally exposed. Electron-microscopy-derived concentrations of amphibole fibers longer than 5 microns correlated well with light microscopic asbestos body counts in the occupational group but not in the environmental or referent groups. Chrysotile concentration was not related to asbestos body concentration in any group. Crocidolite fiber, a commercial amphibole not native to the region, was nonetheless identified in lung tissue from 15 of 23 chrysotile miners and millers. Environmental exposure to asbestos fiber as a result of residence within 40 km of the mines results in increased lung chrysotile content.     

Asbestos Bodies in Normal Lung of Western Mediterranean Populations with No Occupational Exposure to Inorganic Dust

The aim of this study was to determine the following: (a) asbestos body count in lung tissue of different western Mediterranean populations; (b) the association, if any, of urban industrial residence with higher lung tissue asbestos body counts in this geographical area; and (c) the risk factor that environmental asbestos exposure posed for lung cancer in our population. Lung-tissue samples were studied in three groups of subjects from the general population: (1) group A comprised 18 patients from Barcelona's urban industrial area (mean age = 62.2 y, standard deviation [SD] = 13.6); (2) group B comprised 16 patients who lived in a rural area of Albacete in the south of Spain (mean age = 62.2 y, SD = 13.7); and (3) group C comprised 8 patients who had been diagnosed with lung cancer, who lived in or near Barcelona, and who had never been exposed occupationally to asbestos (mean age = 62.1 y, SD = 7.4). A wet lung/dry lung weight ratio was determined. In group A, asbestos bodies were observed in 9 of 18 (50%) subjects, and asbestos bodies numbered 52.35 per g dry lung (SD = 101.72) (upper limit of normality [higher value] = 430.12 asbestos bodies per g dry lung). In group B, asbestos bodies were observed in 2 of 16 (12.5%) subjects, and asbestos bodies numbered 5.37 per g dry lung (SD = 8.79) (upper limit normality = 35.15 asbestos bodies per g dry lung). In group C, we observed asbestos bodies in 2 of 8 subjects (25.0%), and asbestos bodies numbered 20.59 per g dry weight (SD = 24.10). Comparison between groups A and B indicated small differences in the prevalence of asbestos bodies (i.e., Barcelona 50%, Albacete 12.5%; p = .057 [chi-square test]), as well as small differences in asbestos body counts (i.e., asbestos bodies per g dry lung; Mann-Whitney U-test, p < .001). The results of these comparisons evidenced a higher exposure to asbestos in the urban industrial environment. No statistically significant differences were found between groups A and C (chi-square test/Mann-Whitney U-test: p > .05). We concluded that, in western Mediterranean populations, normal lung asbestos body counts were higher in urban industrial inhabitants than in rural inhabitants; however, in both populations, there was a low prevalence of asbestos bodies. Our results did not suggest that environmental exposure to asbestos played a role in the pathogenesis of lung cancer in subjects who had never been exposed occupationally to asbestos and who had lived in western Mediterranean areas.     

Clinical study of asbestos-related lung cancer

We analyzed the characteristics of 120 patients of primary lung cancer supposed to be induced by exposure to asbestos. Most of 120 patients were male and the age ranged from 47 to 87 years with a median of 70 years. No particular tendency was observed in the histological types of the lung cancer in 120 patients. Forty of the 120 patients were heavy smokers. When the occupational history was analyzed, most of the patients had been exposed to asbestos in former Japanese naval shipyard, commercial shipyards, construction industry and ironworks. The term of asbestos exposure was 2 to 60 years with a median 27 years. Lung cancers appeared after 15 to 69 years with a median 43 years from the initial exposure to asbestos. Lung cancer was accompanied by asbestosis in 35 patients and by pleural plaques in 77. Twenty-two patients had both asbestosis and pleural plaques. The number of asbestos bodies per 5 g wet lung tissue for 72 patients whose lung tissues obtained from autopsy or surgery was more than 150 bodies which meant the number of occupational asbestos exposure. As for the kinds of asbestos fibers of 32 patients, 14 patients exposed to crocidolite, 10 patients to amosite and 8 patients to chrysotile.     

Asbestos exposure according to different exposure indices among Finnish lung cancer patients

Summary During a 6-month period all lung cancer patients in a university hospital chest clinic were investigated for asbestos exposure by means of personal interview, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), roentgenograms, lung function testing, histology and measurement of fibre concentrations in lung tissue samples using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). About one-third of the patients (33%) were classified as having been exposed to asbestos on the basis of the interview. BAL was performed and AB counts were done in 51 patients. Fourteen (27%) BAL specimens had AB counts of 1 or more AB/ml, which is the conventional limit for non-trivial asbestos exposure. For a subgroup of 25 operated lung cancer patients fibre analysis was also available. In six cases (30%) the asbestos-containing samples had asbestos fibre concentrations equal to or more than 1 million fibres/g dry lung. In eight (32%) of the operated lung cancer patients histopathologically confirmed fibrosis was seen; five of these patients were in the two highest exposure classes. Pleural plaques on X-ray films were seen in six (24%) of the operated cases. With each indicator of exposure about 30% of lung cancer patients were found to have been exposed, confirming the one-third rule; however, when all the information was collated there were three cases (12%) in which exposure was most obvious according to the different parameters used in this study. In these three cases the cancer could well be attributed to asbestos. Anthophyllite was present in all asbestos-containing samples and anthophyllite was the main fibre type in 61% of these samples.     

Occupational asbestos exposure, lung-fiber concentration and latency time in malignant mesothelioma

Mineral fiber concentration in lung tissue was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy in 73 males with malignant mesothelioma and in 36 referents who died of cardio- or cerebrovascular diseases. The investigation showed apparent differences in the median lung-fiber concentration between occupational groups with different levels of asbestos exposure, as judged from their occupational history. Thus the mineral fiber content in human lung tissue provides a useful indicator of cumulative asbestos exposure. There was also a statistically significant difference between the median lung-fiber concentration among mesothelioma cases with unlikely or unknown occupational asbestos exposure and the reference group. The latency times in 42 of the cases with definite or probable occupational asbestos exposure showed a log-normal distribution with a median of 37 years and a range of 19-68 years. No statistically significant correlation was found between the logarithm of the latency time and the logarithm of the lung-fiber concentration.     

Asbestos concentration and fiber size in lungs of the urban residents]

Asbestos fiber concentrations and fiber size distribution in lung tissues of 53 urban residents (males: 34, female: 19) were analyzed by low temperature ashing-analytical transmission electronmicroscopy. The following findings were obtained. 1. Pulmonary asbestos fibers were found in 51 out of 53 patients. The types of asbestos fibers were chrysotile, amosite, crocidolite, actinolite and tremolite. 2. Thirty-six of 53 patients had no history of occupational asbestos exposure, and their geometric mean concentration of asbestos fibers was 1.67 x 10(6) fibers/g dry lung. Most of these asbestos fibers are probably attributable to general environmental contamination. Thirteen patients who had a history of occupational asbestos exposure showed a geometric mean of their pulmonary asbestos concentrations (5.82 x 10(6) fibers/g dry lung) which was significantly higher than that of patients without occupational asbestos exposure (p less than 0.01). 3. The geometric mean concentration of asbestos fiber in males (2.70 x 10(6)) was higher than in females (1.59 x 10(6)), probably due to a difference in the occupational asbestos exposure between males and females. 4. Regardless of the patient's sex, the geometric mean concentration of asbestos fibers in patients without a history of smoking (male: 4.91 x 10(6), female: 1.78 x 10(6)) was higher than that in patients with a smoking history (male: 2.76 x 10(6), female: 1.37 x 10(6)). The difference, however, was not statistically significant, and no correlation was seen between the concentration of asbestos fibers and smoking history. 5. Although most asbestos fiber utilized in Japan is chrysotile, the geometric mean concentration of chrysotile (0.87 x 10(6)) was almost identical to that of amphibole asbestos fiber (0.90 x 10(6)). 6. Of the asbestos fibers observed, 95% of chrysotile and 85% of amphibole asbestos were less than 5 microns in length and 93% of the total asbestos fibers were too small to be visible by light microscopy.     

Lung fibre burden in lung cancer cases employed in the rock and slag wool industry

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the relationship between estimated exposure to man-made vitreous fibres (MMVF) and to asbestos fibres and their concentration in the lung tissue of lung cancer cases amongst MMVF production workers. METHODS: Retrospective retrieval of available lung tissue specimens was conducted following a case-control study that assessed estimated occupational exposures of MMVF workers. Fibre recovery and analysis by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were conducted to determine fibre type, fibre dimension and numbers per gram of dry lung tissue. For cases with detailed exposure data, geometric mean (GM) concentrations were compared across the exposure categories, and regression models were used to investigate the relationship between the lung fibres and the variables of estimated exposure, with and without additional variables that may affect fibre retention. RESULTS: A total of 24 samples from 17 cases of lung cancer were available for analysis: MMVF were detected in all cases. Asbestos fibres were detected in 16. No difference or trend in GM MMVF concentration was observed across the estimated exposure categories. Odds ratio (OR) for MMVF g(-1) dry lung was 0.5 (95% confidence interval: 0.1-2.4) for the second, and 3.5 (0.6-18.9) for the third quartile of index of average exposure to MMVF in industry, compared with the first (lowest exposed) quartile (no cases in the highest quartile). CONCLUSIONS: No observable relationship existed between estimated exposure and directly-measured lung fibres among this sample of cases. Retrospective specimen collection, intra-individual variability in fibre concentration, effect of unknown factors on fibre retention and small sample size militated against this study providing evidence for or against a relationship between estimated exposure and lung fibre concentrations.