Gabapentin as Add-On Therapy in Children with Refractory Partial Seizures: A 12-Week, Multicentre, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of gabapentin (Neurontin; GBP) as add-on therapy for refractory partial seizures in paediatric patients aged 3-12 years. METHODS: After a 6-week baseline period, 247 patients (54 centres) entered a 12-week double-blind phase and were randomized to receive either GBP (t.i.d., titrated to 23-35 mg/kg/ day) or placebo. Seizure activity and type were recorded daily. Efficacy variables included Response Ratio (RRatio), responder rate, and percentage change in frequency (PCH) for all partial seizures; PCH and RRatio for individual types of partial seizures; and investigator and parent/guardian global assessments of seizure frequency and patient well-being. RESULTS: RRatio for all partial seizures was significantly lower (better) for GBP-treated patients (p = 0.0407). Responder rate favored GBP, but the difference between treatment groups was not statistically significant. Median PCH for all partial seizures for the GBP treatment group (-17.0%) was better than that for the placebo group (-6.5%). Median PCH for specific seizure types showed GBP to be most effective in controlling complex partial seizures (-35%) and secondarily generalized seizures (-28%) when compared with placebo (-12%, +13%, respectively). A greater percentage of GBP-treated patients exhibited improvement according to investigator and parent/guardian global assessments, with a statistically significant difference observed in the parent/guardian global assessment of seizure-frequency reduction (p = 0.046). Three GBP patients and one placebo patient were seizure free during the double-blind treatment period. GBP was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: GBP was effective and well tolerated as an add-on therapy for partial seizures in paediatric patients with previously drug-resistant seizures.     

Double-Blind Study of Gabapentin in the Treatment of Partial Seizures

Forty-three patients completed a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of Gabapentin (GBP) as add-on therapy in partial and secondarily generalized seizures. All patients were followed for an initial 3-month baseline period, after which they were randomly allocated to receive either a placebo or 900 or 1,200 mg/day GBP for 3 months. A statistically significant difference in seizure frequency from the baseline to the treatment phase was noted between patients receiving placebo and GBP 1,200 mg, in whom seizure frequency decreased 57%. The GBP dosage of 900 mg appeared to be ineffective. A close relationship was observed between the serum GBP concentrations and the GBP dosage based on the seizure frequency. Serum GBP concentrations greater than 2 micrograms/ml resulted in a lower frequency of seizures. The adverse effects were minor and consisted mainly of transient drowsiness. GBP appears to be effective in the treatment of partial epileptic seizures in a dosage-related manner.     

Gabapentin as Add-on Therapy for Refractory Partial Epilepsy: Results of Five Placebo-Controlled Trials

Summary: Gabapentin (GBP, Neurontin), a new antiepi-leptic drug (AED) with a novel mechanism of action, exhibits low acute toxicity in mice, rats, and monkeys, and is not teratogenic. GBP pharmacokinetics are simple and predictable; GBP is eliminated by urinary excretion, is not protein-bound or metabolized, does not induce or inhibit hepatic enzymes, and does not interact with other AEDs. In five placebo-controlled, double-blind studies of GBP as add-on therapy, 307 patients with refractory partial seizures received placebo and 485 received GBP dosages of 600, 900, 1,200, or 1.800 mg/day for 12 weeks following a 12-week baseline. Seizure frequency, as measured by response ratio and responder rate, was improved for patients receiving GBP compared with placebo; differences were statistically significant in two of the three large, multicenter studies. Adverse events occurred in 76% of GBP-treated patients, compared with 57% of placebo-treated patients. No serious adverse events were consistently attributable to GBP therapy. Changes in clinical laboratory values were not considered clinically important. GBP represents a significant addition to the armamentarium of AEDs available for treatment of patients with epilepsy.     

Gabapentin as add-on therapy in children with refractory partial seizures: a 24-week, multicentre, open-label study

The efficacy and safety of gabapentin as add-on therapy for refractory partial seizures in 237 children, aged 3 to 12 years were evaluated over a 6-month period. All children received gabapentin at 24 to 70 mg/kg/day. Efficacy variables included the percent change in seizure frequency and the responder rate (defined as those patients who showed >50% reduction in seizure frequency). For all partial seizures, the median percent change in seizure frequency was -34% and the overall responder rate was 34%. Simple partial seizures showed a median reduction of -53%; complex partial seizures, -38%; and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures, -35%. Thirteen patients (5%) withdrew during the 6-month period because of adverse events. Concurrent antiepileptic medication remained unchanged in 185 patients (78%), was decreased in 27 (11%), and increased in 25 (11%) patients. This 6-month follow-up study has demonstrated that gabapentin was well tolerated and appeared to show a sustained efficacy in a large population of children with refractory partial and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures.     

Efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam 3000 mg/d in patients with refractory partial seizures: a multicenter, double-blind, responder-selected study evaluating monotherapy. European Levetiracetam Study Group

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam (LEV) monotherapy in selected patients with refractory partial seizures. METHODS: In this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, responder-selected study, patients were randomized (2:1 ratio) to receive oral LEV 1500 mg twice daily or placebo during a 12-week add-on phase. Treatment responders (patients with a reduction in partial seizure frequency of 50% or more compared with baseline) entered a monotherapy phase that included a maximum 12-week down-titration period and 12 weeks of monotherapy at 1500 mg twice daily. In both phases, responder rate, seizure frequency, and adverse events were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 286 patients (placebo, n = 105; LEV, n = 181) entered the add-on phase, and 86 patients (placebo, n = 17; LEV, n = 69) were eligible for the monotherapy phase. Thirty-six of 181 patients (19.9%) who received LEV completed the entire study compared with only 10 of 105 patients (9.5%) in the placebo group (p = 0.029). The odds of completing the study on LEV were 2.36 times (95% confidence interval, 1.08, 5.57) higher than on placebo. The responder rate during the add-on phase was significantly higher in the LEV group compared with the placebo group (42.1% vs. 16.7%, respectively; p < 0.001). In the LEV monotherapy group, the median percent reduction in partial seizure frequency compared with baseline was 73.8% (p = 0.037), with a responder rate of 59.2%. Nine patients (18.4%) remained seizure-free on LEV monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Conversion to LEV monotherapy (1500 mg twice daily) is effective and well tolerated in patients with refractory partial seizures who responded to 3000 mg/d LEV as add-on therapy.     

Efficacy and safety of Losigamone in partial seizures: a randomized double-blind study

The objective of the study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of two different dosages of Losigamone (LSG) in add-on treatment of partial seizures. In a multi-center, double-blind, randomized clinical trial, patients received one of three 12-week treatments: placebo, LSG 1200 mg/day, or 1500 mg/day, in addition to up to three standard anticonvulsants after a prospective period of 12 weeks to assess baseline seizure frequency. The primary efficacy measure was the relative reduction of seizure frequency per 4 weeks in the double-blind phase as compared to baseline. In the intention-to-treat population of 264 patients, the relative median reduction of partial seizure frequency was 3.3% for placebo, 19.7% for LSG 1200 mg/day, and 25.3% for LSG 1500 mg/day. The differences of both LSG groups versus placebo were significant (P<0.01, two-tailed). In the responder analysis, 11.8% of the patients in the placebo group, 17.2% in the LSG 1200 mg/day group, and 29.3% in the LSG 1500 mg/day group showed a seizure reduction versus baseline of at least 50%. A positive association between dosage and response was observed (P=0.003). Adverse events during treatment were reported by 58.8% of the patients for placebo, by 62.1% for LSG 1200 mg/day and by 76.1% for LSG 1500 mg/day. Most events in the LSG groups occurred during the first 4 weeks of double-blind (during or immediately after up-titration) and subsided quickly. Over the last 4 weeks of treatment, the incidence of adverse events in the LSG groups was close to the placebo level. Based on the study's results, LSG is an effective and safe add-on drug for refractory partial epilepsy in adults.     

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of rufinamide as adjunctive therapy for refractory partial-onset seizures

Purpose: Efficacy and safety of adjunctive rufinamide (3,200 mg/day) was assessed in adolescents and adults with inadequately controlled partial‐onset seizures receiving maintenance therapy with up to three antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Methods: This randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, multicenter study comprised a 56‐day baseline phase (BP), 12‐day titration phase, and 84‐day maintenance phase (MP). The primary efficacy variable was percentage change in total partial seizure frequency per 28 days (MP vs. BP). Secondary efficacy outcome measures included ≥50% responder rate and reduction in mean total partial seizure frequency during the MP. Safety and tolerability evaluation included adverse events (AEs), physical and neurologic examinations, and laboratory values. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessments were conducted. Results: Three hundred fifty‐seven patients were randomized: 176 to rufinamide and 181 to placebo. Patients had a median of 13.3 seizures per 28 days during BP; 86% were receiving ≥2 AEDs. For the intent‐to‐treat population, the median percentage reduction in total partial seizure frequency per 28 days was 23.25 for rufinamide versus 9.80 for placebo (p = 0.007). Rufinamide‐treated patients were more than twice as likely to have had a ≥50% reduction in partial seizure frequency (32.5% vs. 14.3%; p < 0.001) and had a greater reduction in median total partial seizure rate per 28 days during the MP (13.2 vs. 5.2; p < 0.001). Treatment‐emergent AEs occurring at ≥5% higher incidence in the rufinamide group compared with placebo were dizziness, fatigue, nausea, somnolence, and diplopia. Conclusions: Adjunctive treatment with rufinamide reduced total partial seizures in refractory patients. AEs reported were consistent with the known tolerability profile of rufinamide.     

Gabapentin add-on treatment: how many patients become seizure-free?: An open-label multicenter study

The aim of the study was to find out the percentage of patients with localization-related epilepsy achieving complete seizure control with gabapentin (GBP) add-on therapy. Patients under anti-epileptic drug monotherapy during 8 weeks baseline (BSL) with 6 or more seizures were treated with GBP for 26 weeks up to 2400 mg/day. Patients obtaining complete seizure control of all seizures or any partial seizure type during the last 8 weeks were calculated. Seizure frequency was compared between BSL and last 8 weeks. In all, 110 patients were enrolled (92 completed, 18 discontinued): mean age of the completers: 37.6 years (range 16–72), median seizure frequency per 28 days at BSL: 6.8 (2.5–24.5), mean duration of epilepsy: 17.6 years (0.2–51.4), mean duration with GBP for completers: 182.8 days (144–187). Complete seizure control of all seizures was achieved in 8.7% of patients (simple partial seizures: 13.3%, complex partial seizures 24.3%, secondarily generalized seizures: 61.5%): 38% of the patients became seizure-free in at least 1 seizure-type; 40% experienced adverse events. Assessment for quality of life (QoL) and trough plasma levels of GBP did not correlate with the good effect of GBP.     

Pregabalin add-on treatment in patients with partial seizures: a novel evaluation of flexible-dose and fixed-dose treatment in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study

PURPOSE: To evaluate pregabalin as add-on therapy for patients with partial seizures administered as fixed dose or as flexible dose adjusted to optimal seizure reduction and tolerability. METHODS: Patients receiving antiepileptic drugs (98.8% between 1 and 3 AEDs; 1.2% on more than 3 AEDs) and experiencing > or =4 partial seizures during the 6-week baseline period and no 4-week seizure-free interval were randomized (1:2:2) to placebo (n = 73), pregabalin fixed dose (600 mg/day BID; n = 137), or pregabalin flexible dose (n = 131; 150 and 300 mg/day for 2 weeks each; 450 and 600 mg/day for 4 weeks each, BID) for 12 weeks. Dosage could be adjusted based on tolerability and maintained when a 4-week seizure-free period was achieved. Primary efficacy parameter was reduction in seizure frequency from baseline. RESULTS: Both pregabalin regimens significantly reduced seizure frequency compared with placebo, by 35.4%, for flexible dose (p = 0.0091) and 49.3% for fixed dose (p = 0.0001) versus 10.6% for placebo, and the fixed-dose group was superior to the flexible-dose group (p = 0.0337). Most adverse events were mild or moderate. Discontinuation rates due to adverse events were 6.8% (placebo), 12.2% (pregabalin flexible dose), and 32.8% (pregabalin fixed dose). Patients receiving pregabalin fixed dose discontinued due to adverse event earlier than other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Pregabalin administered twice daily, either as fixed (600 mg/day), or as flexible (150-600 mg/day) dose, was highly effective and generally well-tolerated as add-on therapy for partial seizures with or without secondary generalization. Lower incidence of adverse events and discontinuations were achieved in patients receiving pregabalin when dosing was individualized to optimize efficacy and tolerability.     

Pregabalin add-on treatment: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response study in adults with partial seizures

Summary: Purpose: To evaluate pregabalin (PGB), 150 mg/day, and PGB, 600 mg/day, as an add‐on treatment for patients with refractory partial seizures concurrently treated with one to three anticonvulsants (AEDs). Methods: An international (13 countries), multicenter (45 centers), 12‐week, double‐blind, randomized study in which patients with partial seizures received placebo (n = 96); PGB, 150 mg/day (n = 99); or PGB, 600 mg/day (n = 92); given 3 times a day (t.i.d.). The primary efficacy criterion was reduction in seizure frequency during treatment as compared with baseline, as measured by RRatio, the symmetrical percentage change in seizure rates determined from daily seizure diaries. The RRatio between the 8‐week baseline (pretreatment phase) and the 12‐week treatment period were compared between each of the PGB groups and the placebo group by using an analysis of variance analysis of the intent‐to‐treat population. Results: PGB, 150 mg/day and 600 mg/day, were both significantly more effective than placebo in reducing the RRatio [–11.5 (p = 0.0007) and –31.4 (p ≤ 0.0001), respectively, vs. 0.9]. These RRatio values correspond to seizure‐frequency reductions from baseline of –1.8, 20.6, and 47.8% for placebo, 150 mg/day, and 600 mg/day, respectively. PGB efficacy was significantly dose related (p ≤ 0.0001). Secondary efficacy variables corroborated the findings of the primary analysis. Significantly more patients were responders (≥50% reduction in seizure frequency) in the PGB, 600 mg/day (43.5%), group than in the placebo group (6.2%) (p ≤ 0.001). PGB was well tolerated. Dose‐related, treatment‐emergent adverse events (≥10%), mostly mild or moderate in intensity, were somnolence, dizziness, ataxia, diplopia, and weight gain. The withdrawal rate due to adverse events was 10% of patients at 150 mg/day and 18.5% of patients at 600 mg/day, compared with 6.2% of patients receiving placebo. Conclusions: PGB, 150 mg/day and 600 mg/day, is highly effective and well‐tolerated add‐on therapy in patients with partial seizures.     

Multicenter double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of levetiracetam as add-on therapy in patients with refractory partial seizures. European Levetiracetam Study Group

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam (LEV, Keppra) as add-on therapy in patients with refractory partial seizures. METHODS: In this European multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, LEV (500 or 1,000 mg twice daily) was compared with placebo as add-on therapy in 324 patients with uncontrolled simple or complex partial seizures, or both, with or without secondary generalization. After enrollment, three parallel groups were assessed during a baseline period of 8 or 12 weeks, followed by a 4-week titration interval and a 12-week evaluation period. RESULTS: LEV significantly decreased partial seizure frequency compared with placebo. A reduction in seizure frequency of > or =50% occurred in 22.8% of patients in the 1,000-mg group and 31.6% of patients in the 2,000-mg group, compared with 10.4% of patients in the placebo group. Administration of LEV did not affect plasma concentrations of concomitant antiepileptic drugs or alter vital signs or laboratory parameters. No significant difference in the incidence of adverse events was observed between treatment groups (70.8% for the 1,000-mg group and 75.5% for the 2,000-mg group), or between the LEV and placebo groups (73.2% for placebo group). The most commonly reported adverse effects in the LEV group were asthenia, headache, and somnolence. CONCLUSIONS: The antiepileptic efficacy and tolerability of LEV (1,000 mg/d and 2,000 mg/d, administered in two divided doses) as add-on therapy was established in patients with refractory partial seizures in this clinical study.     

Long-term safety and efficacy of gabapentin (neurontin) as add-on therapy in patients with refractory partial seizures

In an international, multicenter, open-label study, the long-term efficacy and safety of gabapentin (GBP, Neurontin) as add-on therapy were investigated in 203 patients with partial seizures refractory to standard antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). All patients enrolled in this study had experienced improved seizure control with GBP in one of four previous, short-term studies. Patients received mean GBP dosages of 1,283 to 2,220 mg/day for periods of ⩽1,894 days (mean, 385 days). For purposes of efficacy analyses, data were divided into 12-week treatment periods. During long-term treatment, the efficacy of GBP was shown to be maintained by several primary efficacy measures. In all of the 12-week treatment periods, the percentage of change in seizure frequency from baseline was equal to or less than −24%, responder rate was >35%, and response ratio ranged between −0.2 and −0.338. Results for secondary efficacy measures also indicated that efficacy was maintained. The favorable safety profile of GBP also was maintained during long-term treatment. Our results suggest that GBP is an effective, safe, and well-tolerated add-on treatment for long-term use in patients with partial seizures refractory to standard AEDs.     

Rapid onset of action of levetiracetam in refractory epilepsy patients

PURPOSE: To investigate whether rapid achievement of levetiracetam (LEV) steady state is translated into an immediate measurable efficacy. The time to onset of action of LEV immediately after its initiation in adult patients with refractory partial seizures was analyzed. METHODS: Treatment effect was assessed in a pooled analysis (n=883) from three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled add-on trials. RESULTS: The increase in the proportion of seizure-free patients over baseline was 15, 17, and 17% for the first, second, and third day, respectively, for the LEV 1,000-mg group (all differences statistically significant; McNemar p value<0.001), whereas the increase was 7, 9, and 9% for the 333-mg LEV group (differences not significant). No major changes were observed for the placebo group. For differences in proportion of seizure-free patients between groups, the probability of being seizure free in the LEV groups was twofold higher than in the placebo group. For the 1,000-mg LEV group, odds ratios were 2.3, 2.5, and 2.7 for the first, second, and third day of therapy, respectively; all differences versus placebo were statistically significant (logistic regression p values, all <0.001). The addition of LEV significantly increased the proportion of patients without a seizure as of the first day of therapy. Each of the first 3 days, seizure freedom was twice as likely to occur with LEV 1,000 mg than with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence of a rapid onset of action of LEV 1,000 mg was demonstrated through a significant increase in the proportion of seizure-free patients as of the first day of therapy.     

Dose-response effect of levetiracetam 1000 and 2000 mg/day in partial epilepsy

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy, dose-response, tolerability, and withdrawal effects of levetiracetam (Keppra) as adjunctive therapy in adult patients with partial epilepsy. METHODS: In this European multicenter, double-blind, randomized, cross-over trial, levetiracetam 1000 or 2000 mg/day given in two divided doses was compared to placebo as add-on therapy in 324 patients with refractory partial seizures with or without secondary generalization. This trial consisted of six periods: an 8- or 12-week baseline, a treatment period A (4-week titration and 12-week evaluation), a treatment period B (4-week titration and 12-week evaluation), and a withdrawal period. During each evaluation period (A and B), patients received two of the three possible treatment regimens. RESULTS: This study provides additional information on dose-response effects and withdrawal phenomena and confirms the responder and seizure freedom rates previously reported in the parallel part of the study (Epilepsia 41 (2000) 1179-1186). Both doses of levetiracetam significantly decreased mean partial seizure frequency compared with placebo (P<0.001), and significantly more patients receiving levetiracetam had > or = 50 and > or = 75% reductions in partial seizure frequency (1000 mg, P=0.004 and P=0.043, respectively; 2000 mg P=0.001 and P<0.001, respectively). In addition, 5.5% (10/183) of patients receiving levetiracetam 1000 mg/day and 6.3% (11/175) of patients receiving levetiracetam 2000 mg/day were seizure-free during the corresponding evaluation period, compared with 1.2% (2/172) of patients on placebo. A within-patient comparison revealed a significantly greater responder rate for the higher levetiracetam dose (P=0.018). The most commonly reported adverse effects (> or = 5% and more frequent in one of the groups with levetiracetam) were headache, asthenia, infection, somnolence, pharyngitis, dizziness, and pain. No withdrawal-related adverse events were reported during the cross-titration period. CONCLUSIONS: Levetiracetam was effective and well-tolerated and decreased seizure frequency in a dose-dependent manner, with no evidence of typical withdrawal-related adverse events or rebound phenomena after withdrawal or down-titration.     

Gabapentin in refractory partial epilepsy — a trial in India

Gabapentin (GBP) has been shown to be effective an add-on drug for the treatment of refractory partial epilepsy. We undertook an open clinical trial to test its efficacy for the first time in India. Twenty-six patients with refractory partial seizures (> 4 per month) were given GBP in a titrated dose and the seizure frequency was noted for 3 months. The mean reduction in seizures was significant: 15.87 (SD = 4.5) vs 5.80 (SD = 10.25). The mean percentage change (PCH) from the baseline was - 36. Twenty-one of 26 (80%) patients had a reduction in the number of seizures, and 13/26 (50%) were identified as responders (> 50% reduction in seizures). The responders were significantly younger than the nonresponders. Adverse events were mild and noted in 46% patients. Although the trial has its limitations, this is probably the first trial of GBP in a developing country.     

Multicenter double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of levetiracetam as add-on therapy in Chinese patients with refractory partial-onset seizures

Purpose:   To evaluate efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam (LEV; Keppra^®) as add-on therapy in Chinese patients with refractory partial-onset seizures.
Methods:   In this multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, 206 patients aged 16–70 years with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures were randomized to receive LEV (n =103) or placebo (n =103); 202 patients (LEV, n =102; placebo, n = 100) comprised the intent-to-treat population. An 8-week historical baseline period confirmed eligibility according to seizure count. The 16-week treatment period consisted of a 4-week up-titration period (LEV, 1,000–3,000 mg/day in two equal divided doses) followed by a 12-week maintenance period. Efficacy assessments were based on weekly frequency of partial-onset seizures during the 16-week treatment period.
Results:   LEV significantly decreased weekly partial-onset seizure frequency over placebo by 26.8% (p  < 0.001). Median percentage reductions in weekly partial-onset seizure frequency from historical baseline were 55.9% for LEV and 13.7% for placebo (p  < 0.001). The ≥50% responder rates were 55.9% for LEV, compared with 26.0% for placebo (p  < 0.001). Freedom from partial-onset seizures during treatment period was achieved by 11 LEV patients (10.8%) and 2 placebo patients (2.0%) (p = 0.012). Adverse events were reported by 65 LEV-treated patients (63.1%) and 62 placebo-treated patients (60.2%); most were of mild-to-moderate intensity. The most common adverse events were somnolence (LEV, 17.5%; placebo, 17.5%), decreased platelet count (LEV, 9.7%; placebo, 9.7%), and dizziness (LEV, 7.8%; placebo, 13.6%).
Discussion:   Add-on LEV was effective and well-tolerated in Chinese patients with refractory partial-onset seizures.     

Gabapentin and lamotrigine in Indian patients of partial epilepsy refractory to carbamazepine

52 patients (25 males and 27 females) suffering from refrectory partial seizures, of not more than two years duration and on carbamazepine monotherapy were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly put on gabapentin (19 males and 8 females) or lamotrigine (6 males and 19 females) as add on therapy. The efficacy of the drugs was assessed by the seizure frequency, pattern of seizures and seizure free interval. The safety was evaluated from the biochemical investigations and the adverse effects observed or reported by the patients during the course of the study. The average frequency of basal partial seizures was 6.26+3.86 and 5.04+2.47 which decreased significantly (p<. 001) after 12 weeks of add on therapy to 1.75+2.16. and 1.68+2.94 in the GBP and LTG group respectively. However, there was no significant difference between the two drugs after 12 weeks of add on therapy. The PCB (primary change in basal seizure frequency) values decreased to -72+34.92 and -76.22+29.68 in the GBP and LTG group respectively. The difference in these two groups was not significant. The responder rate was 77.7% and 92% respectively in GBP and LTG group respectively. GBP was found to be more effective in partial seizures with secondarily generalization while LTG was effective in all subtypes of partial seizures. The abnormal scalp EEG was recorded in 33.3% (9 of 27 patients) in GBP group and 40 %( 10 of 25 patients) in LTG group and it did not revert to normal in 33.3% and 40% of patients in either of groups (GBP/LTG). Minor side effects which were self limiting were noticed in 80% in groups I and 74% were groups II.     

Efficacy and safety of levetiracetam in clinical practice: results of the SKATE trial from Belgium and The Netherlands.

OBJECTIVE: Aim of the study was to assess the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam as add-on treatment in patients with partial-onset epilepsy in clinical practice. METHODS: In this observational, multi-centre study patients were treated with levetiracetam for 16 weeks. From a starting dose of 1000 mg/day, dose levels were adjusted at 2-weekly intervals in 1000-mg steps, to a maximum of 3000 mg/day, based on seizure control and tolerance. Analysis of efficacy was based on reduction in seizure frequency relative to baseline, 50% and 100% responder rates (for partial seizures and all seizure types combined) and percentage of patients using levetiracetam at the end of the study. Analysis of safety was based on occurrence of adverse events. RESULTS: The present analysis concerns the results of patients recruited in Belgium and The Netherlands. Of the 251 patients included in the study, 86.9% completed 16 weeks of treatment. Reduction in frequency of partial-onset seizures was 62.2%, with 19.3% of the patients becoming seizure free and 56.6% having a reduction in seizure frequency of > or = 50%. These percentages were more or less the same when calculated for all seizure types combined. Tolerance of levetiracetam treatment was good, with most adverse events being only mild to moderate in severity, and only 10.0% of the adverse events leading to discontinuation from the study. Asthenia, somnolence, dizziness and headache were the most frequently reported adverse events. CONCLUSION: Levetiracetam is effective and safe as add-on treatment for partial-onset seizures in clinical practice.     

Topiramate Monotherapy for Partial Onset Seizures

Summary: Purpose: Evaluation of topiramate (TPM) as monotherapy in patients with uncontrolled partial onset seizures.
Methods: A total of 48 patients were evaluated in a doubleblind, parallel-group trial. During a 56-day baseline period, patients had at least eight partial onset seizures while being treated with one or two standard antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). After 1–2 weeks of open-label treatment with TPM 100 mg/day, patients were randomly assigned, in equal proportions, to receive double-blind therapy with TPM 100 or 1,000 mg/day in a 5-week conversion and an 11-week monotherapy period. The study endpoint was completion of 112 study days (success) or fulfillment of one or more exit criteria: doubling of average 28- day or highest 2-day baseline seizure rate, a generalized tonic-clonic seizure (GTCS) if none had occurred at baseline, or significant prolongation of generalized seizure duration.
Results: Time until exit was longer (p = 0.002) and success frequency was higher (p = 0.005) with TPM 1,000 as compared with 100 mg/day. Seizure-rate reductions of 50, 75, or 100% were achieved by 46, 25, and 13% of the 1,000-mg/day group, respectively, as compared with 13, 8, and 0% of the 100-mg/day group, respectively. Most adverse events (AE) were mild or moderate in severity.
Conclusions: Monotherapy with TPM 1,000 mg/day for partial onset seizures with or without secondarily generalized seizures was effective, with a favorable safety profile.     

托吡酯单用及添加治疗癫痫302例临床分析

目的　观察托吡酯添加和单药治疗癫痫的临床疗效及不良反应 ,并探讨单药治疗的理想给药模式。方法　入组患者分为 3组 ,A组 10 2例采用托吡酯添加治疗 ,B组 2 0 0例采用托吡酯单药治疗 ,按初始剂量及加量速度不同 B组又分为 B1组、B2组。B1组 10 5例 ,妥泰初始剂量 2 5 mg/ d,增量 2 5 m g/ w至 2 0 0 m g/ d;B2组 95例 ,妥泰初始剂量 5 0 mg/ d,增量 5 0 m g/ w至 2 0 0 m g/ d。维持治疗 12周。记录发作情况及不良反应。结果　 A组总有效率及控制率分别为 6 0 .8%、2 4 .5 % ,B组总有效率及控制率为 76 .8%、4 1.5 % ,两组疗效差异有显著性意义 (P<0 .0 5 )。 B1组总有效率及控制率分别为 77.9%、4 1.9% ,B2组总有效率及控制率分别为 75 .8%、4 0 .0 % ,两组疗效差异无显著性意义 (P>0 .0 5 )。托吡酯对各型部分性发作及强直 -阵挛性发作的疗效差异无显著性意义 (P>0 .0 5 )。B2组不良反应高于 B1组 ,差异有显著性意义 (P<0 .0 5 )。结论　托吡酯添加及单药治疗癫痫具有良好的疗效 ,对发作频率较低的患者宜选用小剂量起始缓慢加量的治疗方法 ,对发作频率较高的患者可考虑予较大起始剂量并以较快速度加量以尽快控制发作