Evaluation of the VITEK 2 system for rapid direct identification and susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli from positive blood cultures

This study explores the possibility of combining the BacT/Alert Microbial Detection System with the VITEK 2 system to achieve rapid bacterial identification and susceptibility testing. Direct inoculation of bacterial suspension to the VITEK 2 ID-GNB card and AST-NO09 card was made by differential centrifugation of blood cultures of organisms with gram-negative enteric bacillus-like morphology. A total of 118 strains were investigated; of these, 97 (82.2%) strains were correctly identified to the species level and 21 (17.8%) strains were not identified; by comparing the results with those of the reference method of API identification systems using a pure culture, it was found that no strain had been misidentified. Among the 21 strains with no identification, 13 (61.9%) strains were nonfermenters. The direct-identification reporting time of VITEK 2 was 3.3 h. Direct testing of susceptibility to 11 antibiotics, i.e., amikacin, cefepime, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, imipenem, meropenem, netilmicin, piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and tobramycin, was also performed by using the broth microdilution (MB) method according to the NCCLS guidelines as a reference. After comparing the MICs of the VITEK 2 system with those obtained by the MB method within +/-twofold dilution, it was determined that the 1,067 organism-antibiotic combinations had an overall correct rate of 97.6% (1,041 combinations). The rates of susceptibility to the 11 antibiotics ranged from 88.7 to 100%, respectively. Only two (0.2%) and four (0.4%) combinations of the susceptibility tests gave very major errors (i.e., reported as sensitive by the VITEK 2 system but shown to be resistant by the MB method) and major errors (i.e., reported as resistant by the VITEK 2 system but shown to be sensitive by the MB method), respectively. The reporting time for the direct testing of susceptibility against the 11 antibiotics for 97 blood culture isolates by the VITEK 2 system ranged from 3.3 to 17.5 h. Compared with conventional methods that require 1 or 2 days, this method can make same-day reporting possible and thus permit better patient management.     

Evaluation of Etest for direct antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts in positive blood cultures

The performance of the Etest (AB BIODISK, Solna, Sweden) for direct antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts in positive blood cultures was compared with that of the macrodilution method for determining the MICs of five antifungal agents. Culture broths with blood from bottles positive for yeasts were inoculated directly onto plates for susceptibility testing with the Etest, and the MICs were read after 24 and 48 h of incubation. A total of 141 positive blood cultures (72 cultures of Candida albicans, 31 of Candida tropicalis, 14 of Candida glabrata, 11 of Candida parapsilosis, 3 of Candida krusei, and 3 of Cryptococcus neoformans, 4 miscellaneous yeast species, and 3 mixed cultures) were tested, and the rates of MIC agreement (+/-1 log(2) dilution) between the direct Etest (at 24 and 48 h, respectively) and macrodilution methods were as follows: amphotericin B, 81.8 and 93.5%; flucytosine, 84.8 and 87.7%; fluconazole, 89.4 and 85.5%; itraconazole, 69.7 and 63.8%; ketoconazole, 87.9 and 79.0%. By a large-sample t test, the difference in log(2) dilution between the direct Etest and the macrodilution method was found to be small (P < 0.05). The lone exceptions were ketoconazole at 48 h of incubation and itraconazole at both 24 and 48 h of incubation (P > 0.05). By Tukey's multiple comparisons, the difference between the direct Etest (48 h) and reference methods among different species was found to be less than 1 log(2) dilution. When the MICs were translated into interpretive susceptibility, the minor errors caused by the direct Etest (at 24 and 48 h, respectively) were as follows: flucytosine, 2.3 and 1.4%; fluconazole, 3.0 and 3.6%; itraconazole, 21.2 and 21.3%. Itraconazole also produced an additional 3.0 and 3.6% major errors as determined by the direct Etest at 24 and 48 h, respectively. It was concluded that, except for itraconazole, the Etest method was feasible for direct susceptibility testing of blood cultures positive for yeasts. The method is simple, and the results could be read between 24 and 48 h after direct inoculation, whenever the inhibition zones were discernible.     

Use of the BD PHOENIX Automated Microbiology System for direct identification and susceptibility testing of gram-negative rods from positive blood cultures in a three-phase trial

The present study describes the use of the automated BACTEC 9240 blood culture system, the Serum Separator Tube (SST), and the BD PHOENIX Automated Microbiology System in combination for the direct identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of gram-negative rods (GNRs) from positive blood cultures (BCs) without subculture. The study was conducted in three phases: (i) the recovery yield of Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was determined with the SST between 0 and 8 h after spiked BC bottles turned positive; (ii) the identifications and susceptibility testing results obtained with the PHOENIX system for nine American Type Culture Collection strains of GNRs processed by the SST procedure and for colonies from agar medium were compared; and (iii) the procedure with the BACTEC system, SSTs, and the PHOENIX system was applied to positive cultures of blood from 309 patients during a 3-month period. The SST procedure with E. coli yielded sufficient numbers of cells to perform direct inoculation at any time between 0 and 8 h after a BC bottle turned positive. By using the identities obtained from pure cultures with the PHOENIX system and other biochemical identification systems as reference methods, the agreement between the reference methods and the PHOENIX system tested directly by using cultures of blood from patients was 92.9%. The 7.1% discrepant results were due to 6.5% incorrect identifications with the PHOENIX system with BC samples and 0.6% incorrect identifications with the PHOENIX system with samples from agar cultures. By AST the overall categorical accuracy was 99.0%, with 0.1% very major errors, 0.1% major errors, and 0.8% minor errors. In conclusion, use of the combination of the BACTEC system, SSTs, and the PHOENIX system has the potential to allow the agar isolation step to be skipped and the procedures for rapid direct identification and susceptibility testing of GNRs from positive BCs to be improved both in hospital-based and in central non-hospital-based laboratories.     

Evaluation of the Merlin MICRONAUT system for rapid direct susceptibility testing of gram-positive cocci and gram-negative bacilli from positive blood cultures

Bloodstream infections are life-threatening conditions which require the timely initiation of appropriate antimicrobial therapy. We evaluated the automated Merlin MICRONAUT system for rapid direct microtiter broth antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of gram-positive cocci and gram-negative bacilli from BACTEC 9240 bottles with positive blood cultures in comparison to the standard method for the Merlin MICRONAUT system. This prospective study was conducted under routine working conditions during a 9-month period. Altogether, 504 isolates from 409 patients and 11,819 organism-antibiotic combinations were evaluated for comparison of direct and standard AST methods. For gram-negative bacilli, direct and standard AST of 110 isolates was evaluated and MIC agreement was found for 98.1% of 2,637 organism-antibiotic combinations. Category (susceptible, intermediate susceptible, resistant [SIR]) agreement was found for 99.0%, with results for 0.04% of combinations showing very major errors, those for 0.2% showing major errors, and those for 0.8% showing minor errors. For gram-positive cocci, 373 isolates were evaluated and MIC agreement was found for 95.6% of 8,951 organism-antibiotic combinations. SIR agreement was found for 98.8%, with results for 0.3% of combinations showing very major errors, those for 0.4% showing major errors, and those for 0.5% showing minor errors. Although the number of tested isolates was limited (n = 33), direct AST of streptococci was performed for the first time, yielding promising results with SIR agreement for 98.6% of 363 organism-antibiotic combinations. In conclusion, direct AST of gram-negative bacilli and gram-positive cocci from positive blood cultures with the MICRONAUT system is a reliable technique that allows for the omission of repeat testing of subcultured isolates. Thereby, it reduces the time to results of blood culture testing and may have a positive impact on patient care.     

Evaluation of a capacitance method for direct antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts in positive blood cultures

The feasibility of using a capacitance method (CM) for direct antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts in positive blood cultures was evaluated. The CM used the same test conditions as those recommended by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. After direct inoculation of positive culture broths into module wells (Bactometer; bioMérieux, Inc., Hazelwood, Mo.), the end-point determination was made by monitoring the capacitance change in the culture broths with Bactometer. The MIC of amphotericin B was the lowest concentration at which yeast growth was completely inhibited, while the MICs of ketoconazole, flucytosine, and fluconazole were the concentrations at which a >/=80% reduction in capacitance change was observed. The MICs of the four drugs against each blood isolate obtained on subculture plates were also determined by the macrodilution method. For 51 positive blood cultures tested, the percent agreement (+/-2 log(2) dilutions) between the CM and the macrodilution method were as follows: amphotericin B (98%), ketoconazole (92%), flucytosine (84%), and fluconazole (96%). The CM was further used for breakpoint susceptibility testing of fluconazole (8 and 64 microg/ml) and flucytosine (4 and 32 microg/ml) against yeasts in positive blood cultures. After testing of 74 specimens by the CM, flucytosine and fluconazole produced one (1.4%) major error and two (2.8%) minor errors, respectively. All yeasts that displayed resistance to flucytosine or fluconazole were detected within 24 h after direct inoculation of the positive broths into Bactometer. The CM may be useful for the rapid detection of antifungal resistance in positive blood cultures containing yeasts.     

Evaluation of the Minitek system for direct identification of anaerobic rods from positive blood cultures

The direct inoculation of the Minitek anaerobe identification system (BBL Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md.) from positive blood cultures was compared with subculture and Minitek results obtained using the manufacturer's recommended procedures. A total of 40 clinical anaerobic blood cultures were processed for rapid identification utilizing bacterial pellets obtained by centrifugation. Of these cultures, 30 yielded pure isolates of anaerobic rods that were used for comparison. In 87% of the pure cultures, identification from the direct inoculum method was identical to the routine procedure using Minitek biochemicals. When the additional test for lecithinase and lipase production was included, the identification agreement was 97%. Direct identification of anaerobic rods from blood cultures utilizing the Minitek system is reliable, easy to perform, and can provide a complete identification in 24 h from the time a blood culture showed growth.     

Rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Gram-positive cocci in blood cultures by direct inoculation into the BD Phoenix system

Rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of the causative agent(s) of bloodstream infections are essential for the selection of appropriate antimicrobial therapy. To speed up the identification and AST of the causative agent, the fluid from blood culture bottles of a Bactec 9240 instrument (Becton Dickinson) containing Gram-positive cocci was mixed with saponin. After a 15-min incubation, the bacteria were harvested and transferred to the appropriate panel of a BD Phoenix automated microbiology system (Becton Dickinson) for identification and AST. With this approach (referred to as the direct method), we concordantly/correctly identified 56 (82%) of 68 monomicrobial cultures using the results obtained with the method currently used in our laboratory (current method) as comparator. Two (3%) isolates could not be identified and ten (15%) were misidentified. Complete agreement, concerning clinical susceptibility categories and MIC values, between the AST results determined with the direct method and the current method was found for 32 (55%) of 58 isolates. The E-test indicated that the direct method yielded a correct susceptibility profile for 13 of the remaining 26 blood culture isolates. Therefore, a concordant/correct susceptibility profile (with all antimicrobial agents tested) was obtained for 45 (77%) of 58 cultures. The overall error rate amounted to 1.9%, with the majority (1.3%) of errors being minor. Importantly, the results obtained with the direct method were available 12–24 h earlier than those obtained with the current method.     

Same-day identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing on positive blood cultures: a simple and inexpensive procedure

Fast diagnostic tools are becoming a hot topic in microbiology, especially in the case of septic patients. Therefore, we attempted to develop a fast, inexpensive, accurate and easy method to identify bacteria and perform an antibiotic susceptibility test directly on positive blood cultures that could be used in a routine laboratory. A procedure based on centrifugation and washing steps was performed on 110 non-duplicated (including nine seeded) positive blood culture bottles. Direct identification (DID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) was conducted on the pellet with the MALDI Biotyper and Phoenix, respectively. Identification (ID) to the species level was correct in 44/45 (97%) cases for Gram-negative bacteria and 44/56 (79%) cases for Gram-positive bacteria. In total, 98.9% of the AST results were identical to the routine laboratory result. No very major errors, four major errors and eight minor errors were detected. A reliable identification and a high AST agreement were obtained from blood cultures seeded with multi-resistant bacteria. We simulated the timeline of DID and demonstrated an identification and AST result within 24 h using Escherichia coli- and Staphylococcus aureus-positive blood cultures as examples. We developed an easy, fast and cheap method to generate reliable ID and AST results. Moreover, this method may be used to obtain results within 24 h after incubating the blood culture bottles in the microbiology lab.     

Evaluation of the Cobas-Bact system for direct and rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gram-negative rods from positive blood culture broths.

A direct antimicrobial susceptibility test and a direct identification of positive blood culture broths for gram-negative rods confirmed with Gram stain by using a new instrument, Cobas-Bact, were compared with the conventional Kirby-Bauer agar diffusion disk method and with the in-house set of identification or API 20E, respectively. The bacterial pellet of centrifuged positive blood culture broth was used to inoculate a Cobas-Bact susceptibility and identification rotor. Bacteria from 206 cases of monomicrobial septicemia due to members of the family Enterobacteriaceae were tested. In 198 episodes (96%), direct identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing results were obtained for the same bacterial pathogen within 5 h of detection. Of 204 direct identifications obtained, 177 (86.6%) were "high-confidence" correct identifications (percentage of likelihood [P] greater than or equal to 80%) and 25 (12.5%) "low-confidence" correct identifications (P less than 80%), whereas only 2 misidentifications occurred (1 Escherichia coli and 1 Proteus mirabilis). Direct susceptibility testing was performed in 199 episodes (96%), providing 1,885 antibiotic-microorganism combinations. Full agreement reached 86.3%, and essential agreement reached 92.8%. Minor discrepancies were found in 120 (6.5%) of the tests, major discrepancies were found in 127 (6.8%) tests, and very major discrepancies were found in only 7 (0.4%) tests. Subsequent MIC determinations in cases of major or very major discrepancies reduced the number of major discrepancies involving cephalosporins from 60 to 16, whereas all those involving aminoglycosides remained. Overall, this direct and rapid Cobas-Bact identification and susceptibility testing procedure offered accurate information with 5 to 6 h after the laboratory detection of bacteremia and septicemia due to members of the Enterobacteriacease.     

CHROMagar Candida medium for direct susceptibility testing of yeast from blood cultures

An evaluation was performed on 95 blood cultures positive for Candida spp. to determine the correlation of direct susceptibility testing of fluconazole versus both standardized disk diffusion and MIC methods. For direct testing, an aliquot taken from BD BACTEC Plus and/or BD BACTEC Lytic/10 bottles (Becton Dickinson [BD], Sparks, MD) positive by gram stain for yeast was subcultured to CHROMagar Candida (BD), and a 25-microg fluconazole disk (BD) was placed on the plate. The area of growth inhibition surrounding the disk was measured at 24 and 48 h. In addition, a subculture of the isolate was tested by a microdilution MIC using YeastOne (TREK Diagnostics Systems Inc., OH) and disk diffusion (NCCLS M44-A) using a standardized inoculum plated onto CHROMagar Candida as well as Mueller-Hinton agar to which 2% glucose and 0.5 microg/ml methylene blue dye was added (MH-GMB). The categorical interpretation derived from the MIC was used as the reference to which the disk diffusion results were compared. There were a total of 41 Candida albicans, 23 Candida glabrata, 20 Candida parapsilosis, 9 Candida tropicalis, and 1 each of Candida krusei and Candida lusitaniae tested. At 24 h there was full agreement among the methods for all C. albicans, C. tropicalis, C. lusitaniae, and C. krusei isolates. For the C. parapsilosis isolates at 24 h there was one very major discrepancy using the direct CHROMagar and one major error with the standardized MH-GMB. The majority of the errors were seen at 24 h with the C. glabrata isolates. Of the 23 C. glabrata isolates at 24 h by direct CHROMagar, there were 10 minor and 1 very major error; by MH-GMB there were 12 minor and 2 very major errors; and by standardized CHROMagar Candida there were 13 minor and 2 major errors. There were no very major errors with C. glabrata when all plates were read at 48 h. At 24 h by the direct and standardized CHROMagar the majority of C. glabrata isolates were more resistant, whereas by MH-GMB they were more susceptible than the reference MIC interpretation. In summary, subculturing yeast directly from blood cultures onto CHROMagar to which a fluconazole disk has been added may provide a presumptive identification at 24 h and, with the exception of C. glabrata, was able to predict the susceptibility to fluconazole with the majority of Candida isolates examined in this evaluation.     

Evaluation of the Cobas-Bact system for direct and rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Enterobacteriaceae from positive urine specimens

A direct antimicrobial susceptibility test and a direct identification of Gram-stained urine specimens positive for Enterobacteriaceae using a new instrument (Cobas-Bact) were compared by means of the conventional Kirby-Bauer agar diffusion disk method and the spot indole test, an in-house set of identification tests or API 20E. Bacteria from 191 cases of monomicrobial bacteriuria due to members of the family Enterobacteriaceae were tested. Direct susceptibility testing was performed in 180 cases (94%), providing 1649 antibiotic-microorganism combinations. A complete agreement was reached in 82% and essential agreement in 92% of cases. Minor discrepancies were found in 163 (9.9%) major ones in 125 (7.6%) and very major ones in 10 (0.6%) of examinations. 72% of all minor and 71% of all major discrepancies were caused by two antibiotics: cephalothin and nitrofurantoin. Of the very major discrepancies, 50% were due to amoxicillin. Of 171 direct identifications obtained, 130 (76%) were "high-confidence" correct identifications (percentage of likelihood p greater than or equal to 80%), 25 (14.6%) "low-confidence" identifications (percentage of likelihood p less than 80%) and 16 (9.4%) misidentifications. On the whole, this direct and rapid Cobas-Bact identification and susceptibility testing procedure provided satisfying information within 5-6 h after collection of urine specimens positive for members of the Enterobacteriaceae family.     

Accuracy of identification and susceptibility results by direct inoculation of Vitek 2 cards from positive BACTEC cultures

Rapid identification of bacteria and prompt acquisition of susceptibility results are valuable for patient care. The objective of the present study was to determine the accuracy of direct inoculation of Vitek 2 cards from positive BACTEC cultures compared to inoculation of the cards from subculture plates. Positive BACTEC cultures sampled between March 2001 and June 2002 were included. The results of direct inoculation were compared with the results of inoculation of Vitek 2 cards from subcultures. Of 161 gram-negative bacilli, 129 (80%) were correctly identified by direct inoculation compared to 145 of 161 (90%) by subculture. Susceptibility testing was performed on 2,862 antibiotic-isolate combinations. The essential agreement was 98.7%. The number of very major, major, and minor errors was 1 (0.2% of resistant strains), 1 (0.04% of susceptible strains), and 68, respectively. Direct identification of Staphylococcus spp. was not performed, but antimicrobial susceptibility was tested using 6,042 antibiotic-isolate combinations. The essential agreement was 95.2%. The number of very major, major, and minor errors was 73 (4.5% of resistant strains), 32 (0.8% of susceptible strains), and 106, respectively. Eighty-four percent of the very major errors occurred with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. The results show that direct inoculation of Vitek cards is valuable as a rapid routine method for identification and susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli. For Staphylococcus spp., the susceptibility results obtained after direct inoculation of Vitek 2 cards are also acceptable except for those obtained with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Susceptibility results for this antibiotic, if obtained using direct inoculation, should not be reported to the clinician.     

Early detection and preliminary susceptibility testing of positive pediatric blood cultures with the Steers replicator.

Early replicator subculturing of blood specimens after 4 to 16 h of incubation detected 135 of 217 (59%) of all positive cultures, including 56 of 64 (87%) Haemophilus influenzae type b, 7 of 22 (32%) Staphylococcus aureus, 19 of 20 (95%) pathogenic streptococci, and 20 of 24 (83%) Enterobacteriaceae. The mean time to detection of the common pediatric pathogens (36 h) was significantly less than that of contaminants (85 h) (P less than 0.001). Blind subculturing to differential media aided in the rapid identification of isolates and the detection of mixed cultures. In addition, a method of obtaining rapid susceptibilities of blood and body fluid isolates to selected antibiotics by blind subculturing to antibiotic-containing media was evaluated. Immediate susceptibility information was obtained for 214 of the 245 (87.3%) isolate-antibiotic combinations. There was complete correlation with a standard Kirby-Bauer reading for 94.9% of these observations. Replicator blood subculturing before 24 h of incubation results in early detection of the majority of pediatric pathogens. The inoculation of additional differential and antibiotic-containing media with each blind subculture aids in rapid identification of isolates and may give limited, but clinically important, immediate susceptibility information.     

Digital imaging for reading of direct rapid antibiotic susceptibility tests from positive blood cultures

European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases - Delaying effective antibiotic therapy is a major cause of sepsis-associated mortality. The EUCAST rapid antibiotic...     

Rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli from blood cultures by the AutoMicrobic system.

A procedure was developed which allows direct identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of fermentative and nonfermentative gram-negative bacilli from positive blood cultures. A 10-ml sample was removed from turbid blood culture bottles, and the bacteria were washed and concentrated by centrifugation. The bacterial pellet was used to inoculate an Enterobacteriaceae Plus Identification Card and a Gram-Negative General Susceptibility Card of the AutoMicrobic system. Results with these cards were compared with results obtained with standard technique for 196 blood cultures seeded with recent clinical isolates. Identification of most cultures was available in 8 h, whereas the antimicrobial susceptibility results were available in an average of 4.7 h for all organisms. Direct identification was correct for 95% of the cultures, whereas the antimicrobial susceptibility data had an average agreement of 87% with 3.8% very major and 1.4% major errors. In using this procedure it was possible to provide accurate preliminary identification and results of antimicrobial susceptibility tests for gram-negative bacilli on the same day that a blood culture was determined to be positive.     

Rapid identification and susceptibility testing using the VITEK(R) 2 system using culture fluids from positive BacT/ALERT(R) blood cultures

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In order to reduce the turnaround time for laboratory diagnosis of bacteremia, the efficacy of identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing using samples taken directly from positive BacT/ALERT(R) standard aerobic and standard anaerobic blood culture bottles was evaluated. METHODS: 160 positive blood culture bottles were examined and incubated at 35 degrees C in 5% carbon dioxide for 4-24 h, and an aliquot of the culture fluid was Gram stained. Samples containing Gram-negative bacilli were inoculated on VITEK(R) 2 ID-GNB (identification-Gram-negative bacilli) and AST (antimicrobial susceptibility testing)-GN04 cards, and those containing Gram-positive cocci were inoculated on ID-GPC (identification-Gram-positive cocci) and AST-P526 cards. The same samples were also examined by the standard method, involving subculture from positive BacT/ALERT standard blood culture bottles. RESULTS: Eighty seven of 97 Gram-negative bacilli (89.7%) and 21 of 63 Gram-positive cocci (33.3%) were correctly identified to the species level. For antimicrobial susceptibility testing, the direct method had an overall error rate of 5.4% for Gram-negative bacilli, with 0.9% very major, 0.9% major, and 3.6% minor discrepancies compared to the standard method. The overall error rate in antimicrobial susceptibility testing for the 13 Staphylococcus spp. was 10.3%, with 6.0% very major, 2.6% major, and 1.7% minor discrepancies. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that VITEK 2 cards inoculated with samples taken directly from positive Bact/ALERT blood culture bottles would provide acceptable identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing results for Gram-negative bacilli, but not for Gram-positive cocci. Compared to the standard method, the direct method would reduce turnaround time by at least 24 h.     

Strategy for rapid identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacteria directly recovered from positive blood cultures using the Bruker MALDI Biotyper and the BD Phoenix system

Decreasing the time to species identification and antibiotic susceptibility determination of strains recovered from patients with bacteremia significantly decreases morbidity and mortality. Herein, we validated a method to identify Gram-negative bacteria directly from positive blood culture medium using the Bruker MALDI Biotyper and to rapidly perform susceptibility testing using the BD Phoenix.     

Rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility profiling of Gram-positive cocci in blood cultures with the Vitek 2 system

Rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility profiling of the bacteria in blood cultures can result in clinical and financial benefits. Addition of saponin to the fluid from blood culture bottles promotes the recovery of the bacteria and thus may shorten the turnaround time of the microbiological analyses. In this study we compared the identification and susceptibility profiles of saponin-treated and untreated (standard method) blood cultures monomicrobial for Gram-positive cocci using Vitek 2. We concordantly identified 49 (89%) of 55 monobacterial cultures using the results with the standard method as reference. Complete categorical agreement between the susceptibility profiles with the new and the standard method was found for 26 (53%) of 49 isolates, while discrepancies were seen for 23 (47%) cultures. E-tests indicated that the new method resulted in a correct susceptibility profile for 8 (35%) of these 23 blood cultures. Therefore, 34 (69%) of 49 cultures showed a concordant/correct susceptibility profile for all antimicrobials with an overall error rate of 2.3%. Thus, addition of saponin to the fluid from blood culture bottles of the Bactec 9240 leads to the rapid (results available ≥12 hours earlier) and reliable identification and susceptibility profiling of Gram-positive cocci in blood cultures with Vitek 2.