For the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism: are all low-molecular-weight heparin compounds the same?

Low-molecular-weight heparin compounds have been used in the treatment of patients with venous thromboembolism for approximately 15 years. Ever since their introduction, there has been discussion about whether low-molecular-weight heparin compounds differ in their efficacy and safety. The best answer would be provided by direct comparison of different low-molecular-weight heparin preparations; however, these trials have not been conducted. Classical meta-analysis has its limitations for such a comparison since only a very small number of trials with the respective low-molecular-weight heparin compounds are available. The objective of the present analysis has been the use of meta-regression to compare the efficacy and safety of different low-molecular-weight heparin compounds in the initial treatment of patients with venous thromboembolism. We used computerized literature searches to identify studies that compared dose-adjusted unfractionated heparin treatment with fixed dose subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin treatment in patients with established venous thromboembolism. The individual odds ratios of the studies were plotted against the absolute percentage of the major outcomes in the unfractionated heparin control group. Linear regression was used to find differences between different low-molecular-weight heparin compounds. There appears to be some variation in efficacy and safety among the currently available low-molecular-weight heparin preparations.     

Low molecular weight heparin administered once versus twice daily in patients with venous thromboembolism: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Low molecular weight heparin is as effective and safe as unfractionated heparin for treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. It is uncertain whether low molecular weight heparin should be administered once-daily or twice-daily in this setting. METHOD: A meta-analysis of randomized studies which directly compared once- and twice-daily administration of low molecular weight heparin for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism was performed. A literature search was performed using Advanced Pub Med and the Cochrane library database, and abstracts from recent meetings were reviewed. Two investigators extracted data independently. RESULTS: Five studies, involving 1522 patients, were eligible. There were no statistically significant differences in the frequencies of symptomatic (odds ratio, 0.85 in favor of once-daily therapy at three months, p = 0.6), and asymptomatic, recurrent venous thromboembolism, total and major bleeds (odds ratio, 1.16 in favor of twice-daily therapy at 10 days, p = 0.8); and death, at 10 days, as well as at three months of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Once-daily low molecular weight heparin appears to be as effective and safe as twice-daily administration for the acute treatment of venous thromboembolism. However, there is inadequate data from studies that directly compared once-daily and twice-daily administration to be able to exclude the possibility of a higher frequency of fatal bleeding with once-daily therapy.     

Cost-effectiveness of low-molecular-weight heparin for secondary prophylaxis of cancer-related venous thromboembolism

Although extended secondary prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin was recently shown to be more effective than warfarin for cancer-related venous thromboembolism, its cost-effectiveness compared to traditional prophylaxis with warfarin is uncertain. We built a decision analytic model to evaluate the clinical and economic outcomes of a 6-month course of low-molecular-weight heparin or warfarin therapy in 65-year-old patients with cancer-related venous thromboembolism. We used probability estimates and utilities reported in the literature and published cost data. Using a US societal perspective, we compared strategies based on quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and lifetime costs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of low-molecular-weight heparin compared with warfarin was 149,865 dollars/QALY. Low-molecular-weight heparin yielded a quality-adjusted life expectancy of 1.097 QALYs at the cost of 15,329 dollars. Overall, 46% (7108 dollars) of the total costs associated with low-molecular-weight heparin were attributable to pharmacy costs. Although the low-molecular-weigh heparin strategy achieved a higher incremental quality-adjusted life expectancy than the warfarin strategy (difference of 0.051 QALYs), this clinical benefit was offset by a substantial cost increment of 7,609 dollars. Cost-effectiveness results were sensitive to variation of the early mortality risks associated with low-molecular-weight heparin and warfarin and the pharmacy costs for low-molecular-weight heparin. Based on the best available evidence, secondary prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin is more effective than warfarin for cancer-related venous thromboembolism. However, because of the substantial pharmacy costs of extended low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis in the US, this treatment is relatively expensive compared with warfarin.     

Nomograms for the administration of unfractionated heparin in the initial treatment of acute thromboembolism--an overview

Despite the availability of low-molecular-weight heparins, unfractionated heparin (UFH) still remains the drug of choice for the initial treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in many countries. When appropriately employed, UFH treatment results in a degree of efficacy and safety that is fully comparable with that obtained with the use of heparin derivatives. The use of nomograms for the intravenous or subcutaneous administration of UFH assures that virtually all patients will promptly achieve adequate levels of anticoagulation, thus decreasing the likelihood of recurrent venous thromboembolism without extra bleeding-risk. In this article we reviewed clinical studies on the implementation and validation of UFH dosing nomograms, and attempted a quantitative analysis of their performance. According to the results of our analysis, a statistically significantly higher proportion of patients treated on the basis of a nomogram reached a therapeutic anticoagulant level within 24 h of treatment, as compared to patients treated following the standard practice (odds ratio, 3.6; 95% CI, 2.6 to 4.9). The rate of recurrent thromboembolic events was significantly lower for patients treated according to a nomogram (odds ratio, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1 to 0.8), while no significant differences in terms of either major or minor bleedings were detected between nomogram patients and controls.     

Treatment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy

The treatment and prevention of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) in pregnant patients is challenging for several reasons. Coumarins can cause embryopathy and other adverse effects in the fetus. Although unfractionated heparin and low-molecular-weight heparins, the cornerstones of initial therapy, are safe for the fetus, they can have significant maternal side effects, including osteoporosis and thrombocytopenia. Because they must be given parenterally, long-term administration is inconvenient. Further, although low-molecular-weight heparins probably cause less maternal osteoporosis and thrombocytopenia than unfractionated heparin, the appropriate dosing regimens for prevention and treatment of thrombosis during pregnancy have not been established. In addition, there is a paucity of reliable information on the incidence of venous thromboembolism and the risk of recurrent thrombosis during pregnancy. This paper briefly reviews the areas of controversy and provides recommendations for the treatment and prophylaxis of acute deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in pregnant patients.     

Fixed-dose, body weight-independent subcutaneous LMW heparin versus adjusted dose unfractionated intravenous heparin in the initial treatment of proximal venous thrombosis. EASTERN Investigators

BACKGROUND: Body weight-adjusted subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) has been proven to be at least as effective and safe as dose-adjusted intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) for the treatment of patients with venous thromboembolism. However, body weight-adjusted dosage of low-molecular-weight heparin may be cumbersome and could lead possibly to incorrect dosing. Therefore a fixed LMWH dose, independent of body-weight, might rationalize initial treatment for venous thromboembolism. METHODS: Patients with proven proximal deep-vein thrombosis were randomly assigned to fixed dose subcutaneous LMWH Certoparin (8,000 anti-factor Xa U b.i.d.; 265 patients) or to adjusted dose i.v. UFH (273 patients) for 12 days. Vitamin K antagonists were started between day 3 and 7 and continued for up to 6 months. The primary outcome measure was a 30 percent or greater improvement in the Marder Score, as revealed by repeated venography on day 12 (end of the initial treatment). The secondary composite outcome measure included death, recurrent venous thromboembolism and major bleeding and was assessed at day 12 and after 6 months by a blinded adjunction committee. RESULTS: The Marder score improved by 30% or more in 30.3% and 25.0% of patients assigned to LMWH (198 paired venograms) and UFH (192 paired venograms), respectively (2p = 0.26). At the end of the initial treatment, the composite outcome was observed in 4 of the 265 patients (1.5%) randomized to LMWH, as compared with 14 of the 273 patients (5.1%) randomized to UFH (2p = 0.03). At 6 months these figures were 6.8% and 12.8%, respectively (risk reduction 0.53, confidence interval 0.31-0.90, 2p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Fixed dose subcutaneous LMWH certoparin is at least as efficacious as UFH in resolving proximal vein thrombosis.     

Low-molecular-weight heparin during pregnancy

Thromboembolism is an infrequent, yet serious cause of both maternal and fetal morbidity and death during pregnancy and the puerperium. Pregnancy itself increases the risk of thromboembolic complications probably owing to a combination of hypercoagulability and venous stasis due to venous dilation. Recent studies have indicated that some serious obstetric complications are correlated with inherited or acquired thrombophilia. The prevalence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) has been extimated to be 1 per 1000-2000 pregnancies in retrospective studies. Anticoagulant treatment and prophylaxis both before and during pregnancy are based on unfractionated heparin (UH), low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and warfarin. Warfarin is teratogenous if administered between the 6th and the 12th week. LMWH is replacing UH in the prevention and treatment of VTE both outside and more recently during pregnancy with the same indications, and also for obstetric complications. This paper assesses the safety and efficacy of heparin therapy during pregnancy and the puerperium. Its cardiovascular and obstetric indications and regimens and maternal and fetal side-effects are also discussed.     

Low-molecular-weight heparin: the optimal duration of prophylaxis against postoperative venous thromboembolism after total hip or knee replacement

Venous thromboembolism is a major health problem. In about 20% of cases, the initial clinical manifestation of venous thromboembolism is sudden death due to pulmonary embolism. Consequently, appropriate prophylaxis is critical in order to improve survival. Because patients with recent surgery have a 22-fold increased risk of postoperative venous thromboembolism, a large research effort has been directed toward identifying the safest and most effective prophylaxis after surgery, especially after total hip or knee replacement. While low-molecular-weight heparin is the most effective prophylaxis currently available, from 15% to 30% of hip or knee replacement patients still develop deep vein thrombosis by the time of hospital discharge, and another 25% develop new deep vein thrombosis by 3 weeks after discharge. Extended out-of-hospital low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis can safely reduce the prevalence of deep vein thrombosis by about 50%. However, essentially all of these thrombi are small, asymptomatic, and resolve without serious clinical sequelae. Based on one clinical trial, out-of-hospital low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis could reduce the incidence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism or all-cause death after discharge by a maximum of 2.2%. At current drug costs, universal out-of-hospital low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis is unlikely to be cost-effective. For most patients, 7 to 10 days of low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis is adequate. Future research should be directed at identifying patients at risk for out-of-hospital venous thromboembolism, and targeting extended prophylaxis to those at highest risk.     

The treatment of venous thromboembolism in special populations

Anticoagulant therapy for the typical venous thromboembolism patient is straightforward with predictably favorable outcomes. However, for certain patients with venous thromboembolism, there remains uncertainty and controversy about optimal treatment. These controversial areas include venous thromboembolism patients with: heparin resistance, renal insufficiency, morbid obesity, cancer, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, recurrent thrombosis despite appropriate anticoagulation, and patients with unprovoked VTE who may or may not benefit from thrombophilia testing. This review summarizes the current data for these special patient populations with venous thromboembolism and provides our recommendations for management.     

Prevention of venous thromboembolism in internal medicine with unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparins: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials

BACKGROUND: The prevention of venous thromboembolic disease is less studied in medical patients than in surgery. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of randomised trials studying prophylactic unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in internal medicine, excluding acute myocardial infarction or ischaemic stroke. Deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) systematically detected at the end of the treatment period, clinical pulmonary embolism (PE), death and major bleeding were recorded. RESULTS: Seven trials comparing a prophylactic heparin treatment to a control (15,095 patients) were selected. A significant decrease in DVT and in clinical PE were observed with heparins as compared to control (risk reductions = 56% and 58% respectively, p <0.001 in both cases), without significant difference in the incidence of major bleedings or deaths. Nine trials comparing LMWH to UFH (4,669 patients) were also included. No significant effect was observed on either DVT, clinical PE or mortality. However LMWH reduced by 52% the risk of major haemorrhage (p = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis, based on the pooling of data available for several heparins, shows that heparins are beneficial in the prevention of venous thromboembolism in internal medicine.     

Prophylaxis against thromboembolism in neurosurgical and head injury patients

Neurosurgical patients are at great risk for venous thromboembolism. Thromboprophylaxis is either with unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). In neurosurgery, this is a matter of debate because of fear from bleeding. Few randomized studies show that chemical prophylaxis is safe after elective neurosurgeries. Prophylaxis with gradual elastic stocking and venous pump may be affective but there are not enough studies and trials examining their efficacy. Larger trials are needed to examine the safety of unfractionated heparin versus LMWH in neurosurgical patients including head injury patients.     

Safety and efficacy of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in cerebral venous thrombosis: A meta-analysis

Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is caused by partial or complete occlusion of the major cerebral venous sinuses or the smaller feeding cortical veins which predispose to the risk of venous infarction and hemorrhage. Current guidelines recommend treating CVT with either low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin (UFH) followed by an oral vitamin K antagonist (VKA) for 3–12 months. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have already established benefit over warfarin as a long-term treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolic disorder like deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and pulmonary embolism (PE) given its equal efficacy and better safety profile. The benefit of DOACs over warfarin as a long-term anticoagulation for CVT has likewise been extensively studied, yet it has not been approved as first-line therapy in the current practice. We therefore performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant studies to generate robust evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of DOACs in CVT. This meta-analysis demonstrates that the use of DOACs in CVT has similar efficacy and safety compared to VKAs with better recanalization rate.     

Recurrent venous thromboembolism in a Spanish population: incidence, risk factors, and management in a hospital setting

The major concern in the management of venous thromboembolism is the propagation of thrombus and rethrombosis. The incidence of recurrences and the duration of oral anticoagulant therapy in these patients are still controversial. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence, timing, and outcome of further thrombotic events after an initial episode of venous thromboembolism in a hospital setting. In addition, we evaluated potential risk factors for all these outcomes. This was designed as a retrospective analysis of all patients admitted to our Center with an episode of deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism between 1986 and 1996. The patients included in the study had to be treated with unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparin, followed by at least 3 months of oral anticoagulants. Natural and acquired hemostasis inhibitors were assayed in patients aged less than 50 years. A total of 290 patients with a first episode of venous thromboembolism were included in the study. A total of 33 patients (11.9%, 95% confidence interval. 7.4-14.6) had recurrent episodes. The cumulative incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism after 2, 5, and 10 years was 7.68, 10, and 12.4%, respectively. The incidence of rethrombosis was significantly higher in patients with idiopathic venous thromboembolism than in patients with secondary thrombosis. Abnormalities of hemostasis were found in 54.5% (95% confidence interval, 37.6-71.4) of the patients with recurrences and under the age of 50 years. Three of seven patients who stopped anticoagulant therapy after the second episode presented a third thrombotic event. In our study population, those patients with idiopathic venous thromboembolism seem to have an increased risk of recurrence. The second thrombotic episode occurs more frequently during the following 2 years after cessation of anticoagulation therapy. Our findings strongly support the use of long-term anticoagulant therapy in patients with recurrent venous thromboembolism.     

Heparin: from animal organ extract to designer drug

Anticoagulant therapy with heparin has been the cornerstone of treatment and prevention of thrombosis for many decades. The properties and indications of heparin, as well as the development of its derivates, the low-molecular-weight heparins, and ultimately the synthetically designed pentasaccharides, are reviewed from a clinical perspective. Unfractionated heparin is a heterogeneous mixture of polysaccharides and glycosaminoglycuronsulfate which for commercial preparations is generally extracted from bovine and sheep lungs and porcine intestinal mucosa. Low-molecular-weight heparins are fragments of unfractionated heparin produced by controlled enzymatic or chemical depolymerization processes with the main difference being in their relative inhibitory activity against factor Xa and thrombin. Pentasaccharides are synthetic drugs that accelerate the interaction between factor Xa and antithrombin but selectively inhibit factor Xa activity. Many clinical studies in the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism in several patient groups, as well as for arterial indications have been performed over the last decades. Low-molecular-weight heparins have proved to be more efficacious and safer than unfractionated heparin. Phase 3 trials have demonstrated similar or superior efficacy combined with superior safety for the short-acting pentasaccharide fondaparinux, as compared to low-molecular-weight heparin. Results of phase 3 trials of the long-acting pentasaccharide idraparinux which is being compared to vitamin K antagonists for long-term treatment are much awaited.     

Outpatient treatment of pulmonary embolism with dalteparin

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary embolism is a common complication of deep vein thrombosis. It has been established that low molecular weight heparin may be used to treat deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism and randomized studies have established that outpatient management of deep vein thrombosis with low molecular weight heparin is at least as effective as in-hospital management with unfractionated heparin. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of eligible patients with pulmonary embolism managed as outpatients using dalteparin (200 U/kg s/c daily) for a minimum of five days and warfarin for 3 months. Outpatients included those managed exclusively out of hospital and those managed initially for 1-3 days as inpatients who then completed therapy out of hospital. Reasons for admission included hemodynamic instability; hypoxia requiring oxygen therapy; admission for another medical reason; severe pain requiring parenteral analgesia or high risk of major bleeding. Patients were followed for three months for clinically apparent recurrent venous thromboembolism and bleeding. RESULTS: Between three teaching hospitals, a total of 158 patients with pulmonary embolism were identified. Fifty patients were managed as inpatients and 108 as outpatients. Of the outpatients, 27 were managed for an average of 2.5 days as inpatients and then completed dalteparin therapy as outpatients. The remaining 81 patients were managed exclusively as outpatients with dalteparin. For all outpatients the overall symptomatic recurrence rate of venous thromboembolism was 5.6% (6/108) with only 1.9% (2/108) major bleeds. There were a total of four deaths with none due to pulmonary embolism or major bleed. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study suggests that outpatient management of pulmonary embolism is feasible and safe for the majority of patients.     

An algal sulfated galactan has an unusual dual effect on venous thrombosis due to activation of factor XII and inhibition of the coagulation proteases

Sulfated galactan from the red alga Botryocladia occidentalis has a potent anticoagulant activity, due to its ability to enhance thrombin and factor Xa inhibition by antithrombin and/or heparin cofactor II. It is less active than unfractionated heparin in arterial thrombosis, but in a venous thrombosis presents a dual effect, inhibiting thrombosis in low but not in high doses. This dual effect on venous thrombosis is a consequence of two actions, one that inhibits thrombin and factor Xa and one that induces factor XII activation. In order to dissociate these effects, we prepared derivatives of the sulfated galactan with low molecular weights. Two fractions that were similar in size to unfractionated heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin were obtained. As the molecular weight decreased, the ability to activate factor XII and to promote inhibition of coagulation proteases in the presence of antithrombin and heparin cofactor II diminished. At approximately 5 kDa, the sulfated galactan fragment had no effect on factor XII activation, and showed the same effect as unfractionated heparin in a venous thrombosis model. The approximately 5-kDa fragment is an antithrombotic with several advantages: i) It is as active as unfractionated heparin in venous thrombosis, but it has little activity in arterial thrombosis; ii) It inhibits venous thrombosis with very little anticoagulant effect; iii) It does not cause bleeding; and iv) It is not obtained from mammals.     

Thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin (dalteparin) in pregnancy

Venous thromboembolism remains an important cause of maternal mortality. For women at risk during pregnancy, the recommended venous thromboembolismprophylaxis is unfractionated heparin. Low molecular weight heparins, such as dalteparin, also may be suitable, but randomised trials have not been performed. Pregnant women (105) with confirmed previous or current thromboembolism were randomised to receive either unfractionated heparin twice daily (mean 20569 IU/day) or dalteparin once daily (mean 4631 IU anti-factor Xa units/day) subcutaneously for thromboprophylaxis during pregnancy and postpartum period. Recurrence of venous thromboembolism and safety of treatments were assessed. Dalteparin administered once daily was safe and effective in thromboprophylaxis during pregnancy and postpartum.     

Risk factors and coagulation parameters in relationship to phlebographic response and clinical outcome in the treatment of acute deep vein thrombosis

Possible correlation of the effects of pharmacotherapy on the inhibition of the in-vivo generation of thrombin and on the prevention of thrombus extension in patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) could help to define patients at higher risk. Patients with symptomatic deep vein thrombosis confirmed by phlebography were randomised to intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH), or a subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin (reviparin) twice daily for one week, or a subcutaneous reviparin once daily for four weeks. The patients were treated with oral anticoagulants for at least 3 months. Main endpoints were regression of thrombus on phlebography on Day 21 and recurrent symptomatic venous thromboembolism up to 3 months. Coagulation parameters, markers of in-vivo thrombin generation, and TFPI-release were determined at randomisation, weeks 1 and 3. Four hundred sixty six responders (reduction of at least 30 per cent in Marder score) and 419 non-responders (Marder score unchanged or changed less than +/-30%) showed no significantly different baseline characteristics. The non-responder group had a higher median Marder score at baseline and after one and three weeks of treatment, and had significantly higher fibrinogen levels, TAT complexes and F1+2 values than responders. There were no significant differences in coagulation parameters between non-responders and patients with asymptomatic + symptomatic VTE with the exception of higher TAT complexes at baseline. Significant differences in Marder score and coagulation parameters at baseline were found between responders and nonresponders. Non-responders have a higher risk tosuffer recurrent VTE and may need intensified treatment.     

The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with unprovoked symptomatic deep vein thrombosis and asymptomatic pulmonary embolism

Patients with a first episode of symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) have a higher risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) than patients with a first episode of proximal lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Patients with symptomatic DVT and silent PE may have a different risk of VTE recurrence than patients that have symptomatic DVT without PE. Therefore, it was the aim of this prospective cohort study to compare the risk of recurrent symptomatic VTE in patients with proximal lower extremity DVT and silent PE to the risk in patients that only have proximal lower extremity DVT. Ninety-one consecutive outpatients presenting to the emergency department of a university hospital subsequently hospitalised with a first episode of unprovoked symptomatic proximal lower extremity DVT, and without new pulmonary symptoms were included. Standard initial treatment consisted of intravenous unfractionated heparin or subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin for 5-7 days, overlapped with oral vitamin-K antagonist therapy, with long-term oral vitamin-K antagonist therapy (goal INR 2.5 [2.0-3.0]). Study endpoints were: symptomatic recurrent DVT, new PE, and recurrent PE, evaluated by standard objective testing. At enrollment, 28 of 91 (31%) patients with DVT had silent PE. In the patients with DVT and silent PE, there were 3 VTE recurrences during 20 person-years of follow-up, while there were no VTE recurrences during 61 person-years of follow- up in the patients with isolated DVT. The Kaplan-Meier estimated VTE recurrence rate at 1 year after the diagnosis of DVT was 11% (95% CI: 2-28%) for patients with symptomatic DVT and silent PE, compared to 0% in patients with isolated symptomatic DVT (p=0.0045). In patients with a first episode of unprovoked symptomatic acute proximal lower extremity DVT, the risk of recurrent VTE was significantly higher in those with silent PE compared to those without PE.     

The management of thrombosis in pregnancy: role of low-molecular-weight heparin

Fatal pulmonary embolism remains the most common cause of mortality among pregnant women in many Western countries. The physiological changes of pregnancy produce a hypercoagulable state that increases the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Women with inherited or acquired thrombophilias are at particularly high risk of VTE during pregnancy, and thromboprophylaxis may be advisable in some cases. Thrombophilia is also associated with complications of pregnancy, including fetal loss, pre-eclampsia, intra-uterine growth restriction, and placental abruption. The antithrombotic agents available for the prevention and treatment of VTE during pregnancy, and pregnancy complications, include unfractionated heparin (UFH), low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and aspirin. Vitamin K antagonists are contra-indicated in pregnancy. Low-dose aspirin may have a role in the prevention of some pregnancy complications, although its safety in early and late pregnancy is uncertain. The efficacy and safety of LMWHs have been demonstrated for the prevention and treatment of VTE in pregnancy. These agents are increasingly being used in place of UFH, which is associated with a higher incidence of side effects compared with LMWH, in addition to the need for regular laboratory monitoring. Evidence is also emerging to support the use of LMWH in the prevention of recurrent fetal loss, although further trials are needed to explore the role of LMWHs in this indication and in the prevention of other complications of pregnancy.