Psychological adjustment of survivors of localised prostate cancer: investigating the role of dyadic adjustment, cognitive appraisal and coping style

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify the factors that contribute to psychological adjustment in prostate cancer patients two or more years post-treatment. METHOD: One hundred and sixty-seven men who had undergone treatment for localised prostate cancer participated in this study. In the sample 63 participants had undergone external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), 55 radical prostatectomy (RP), 27 EBRT plus hormone therapy (EBRT/HT), and the remainder a combination of treatments. Patients completed the UCLA-PCI, the POMS, CISS, DAS and a threat appraisal questionnaire. RESULTS: The majority of patients reported relatively positive adjustment in most domains except sexual functioning. For those who reported ongoing psychological difficulty mood disturbance was associated with sexual bother, dyadic adjustment, threat appraisal, self-efficacy appraisal and emotion-focussed coping. Lower levels of urinary bother were associated with the use of more task-focussed coping. Emotion-focussed coping and threat appraisal mediated the relationship between sexual bother and mood disturbance. Emotion-focussed coping moderated the influence of dyadic adjustment on mood disturbance. CONCLUSIONS: Dyadic adjustment, threat appraisal and coping style play a significant role in the long-term psychological adjustment of prostate cancer patients. The results of the current study indicate that the use of emotion-focussed coping to manage sexual bother appears to result in poor psychological adjustment, which indicates the need for further education or intervention to manage sexual dysfunction. ETHICS CLEARANCE: Human ethics approval was granted from Southern Health, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the Monash University Ethics Committee before commencement of data collection.     

Quality of life after surgery, external beam irradiation, or brachytherapy for early-stage prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: The primary treatments for clinically localized prostate cancer confer equivalent cancer control for most patients but disparate side effects. In the current study, the authors sought to compare health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes after the most commonly used treatments. METHODS: A total of 580 men completed the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36, the University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA) Prostate Cancer Index, and the American Urological Association Symptom Index before and through 24 months after treatment with radical prostatectomy (RP), external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), or brachytherapy (BT). RESULTS: General HRQOL did not appear to be affected by treatment. Obstructive and irritative urinary symptoms were more common after BT (P<.001). Urinary control and sexual function were better after EBRT than BT (P<.001 and P=.02, respectively) and better after BT than RP (P<.001 and P=.01, respectively). Among potent men, recovery of sexual function was best after EBRT and was equivalent after bilateral nerve-sparing surgery or BT. Sexual bother was more common than urinary or bowel bother after all 3 treatments. Bowel dysfunction was more common after EBRT or BT than RP (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, treatment for localized prostate cancer was found to differentially affect HRQOL outcomes. Urinary control and sexual function were better after EBRT, although bilateral nerve-sparing surgery diminished these differences among potent men undergoing RP. BT caused more obstructive and irritative symptoms, while both forms of radiation caused more bowel dysfunction. These results may inform medical decision-making in men with localized prostate cancer.     

A randomized trial of external beam radiotherapy versus cryoablation in patients with localized prostate cancer

BACKGROUND:

A recent randomized trial to compare external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to cryoablation for localized disease showed cryoablation to be noninferior to external beam EBRT in disease progression and overall and disease‐specific survival. We report on the quality of life (QOL) outcomes for this trial.

METHODS:

From December 1997 through February 2003, 244 men with newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer were randomly assigned to cryoablation or EBRT (median dose 68 Gy). All patients received neoadjuvant antiandrogen therapy. Patients completed the EORTC QLQ C30 and the Prostate Cancer Index (PCI) before treatment and at 1.5, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months post‐treatment.

RESULTS:

Regardless of treatment arm, participants reported high levels of QOL with few exceptions. cryoablation was associated with more acute urinary dysfunction (mean PCI urinary function cryoablation = 69.4; mean EBRT = 90.7; P < .001), which resolved over time. No late arising QOL issues were observed. Both EBRT and cryoablation participants reported decreases in sexual function at 3 months with the cryoablation patients reporting poorer functioning (mean cryoablation = 7.2: mean EBRT = 32.9; P < .001). Mean sexual function score was 15 points lower at 3 years for the cryoablation group and 13% more of the cryoablation men said that sexuality was a moderate or big problem.

CONCLUSIONS:

In this randomized trial, no long‐term QOL advantage for either treatment was apparent with the exception of poorer sexual function reported by those treated with cryoablation. Men who wish to increase their odds of retaining sexual function might be counseled to choose EBRT over cryoablation. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.     

Time course and predictors of symptoms after primary prostate cancer therapy.

PURPOSE: Understanding the distinctive patterns of treatment-related dysfunction after alternative initial treatments for early prostate cancer (PC) may improve patients' choice of treatment and later help them adjust to its consequences. We characterized the time course of treatment complications while adjusting for potentially confounding pretreatment factors hindering other observational studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective cohort study of 417 men we assessed urinary, bowel, and sexual function from before primary treatment to 24 months after. To control for potential confounding, we measured sociodemographic and PC prognostic factors, medical comorbidity, and pretreatment function commonly affected by PC and its treatment. RESULTS: Patients who underwent external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), radical prostatectomy (RP), and brachytherapy (BT) differed significantly in sociodemographic factors, cancer prognostic factors, and pretreatment symptom status, especially sexual function. Urinary incontinence increased sharply after RP, while bowel problems and urinary irritation/obstruction rose after EBRT and BT. Sexual dysfunction increased in all patients, particularly after radical prostatectomy, and nerve-sparing surgical technique had little apparent benefit. There was no change in urinary function and little change in overall bowel function after 12 months, but the time course of sexual dysfunction varied by treatment and, for bowel function, by symptom. Multiple regression modeling confirmed that treatment influences all 24-month outcomes, but residual confounding persisted. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment function and the primary treatment modality for early stage PC strongly predict the affected organ systems and time course of dysfunction. With this information, patients and their physicians may refine their choice of treatment and better anticipate its consequences.     

Primary Radical Prostatectomy or Ablative Radiotherapy as Protective Factors for Patients With mCRPC Treated With Radium-223 Dichloride: An Italian Multicenter Study

BackgroundWe investigated, in a real-life setting, the prognostic relevance of previous primary treatment (radical prostatectomy [RP] or external beam radiotherapy [EBRT]) on overall survival for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with radium-223 (²²³Ra).Materials and MethodsIn the present multicenter retrospective study, we enrolled 275 consecutive patients. The demographic and clinical data and mCRPC characteristics were recorded and evaluated at baseline and at the end of treatment or progression. ²²³Ra was administered according to the current label authorization until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. We divided the whole cohort into 2 groups: those who had undergone primary radical prostatectomy or ablative radiotherapy (RP/EBRT) and those who had not received previous primary treatment (NO).ResultsOf the 275 patients, 128 (46.5%) were alive and undergoing monitoring at the last follow-up examination, 103 (37.4%) had stopped treatment because of disease progression or the onset of comorbidities, and 147 (53.5%) had died during the study period. Of the 275 patients, 132 were in the RP/EBRT group (48%), of whom 93 had undergone RP and 76 had undergone ablative EBRT, and 143 patients were in the NO group (52%). The data showed a clear advantage for the patients in the RP/EBRT group compared with those in the NO group, with an estimated median survival of 18 versus 11 months, respectively (P < .001). The results from the multivariate analysis corroborated this trend, with a hazard ratio of 0.7 (P = .0443), confirming the better outcome for the RP/EBRT group.ConclusionsPrevious radical treatment provides a protective role for patients with mCRPC undergoing ²²³Ra treatment.     

Hypogonadism following prostate-bed radiation therapy for prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The degree of testicular damage resulting from primary treatment of prostate carcinoma by external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to the prostate bed has not been determined. If significant testicular damage has occurred, the resulting endocrine changes may result in modified tumor behavior, contribute to postradiation impotence, and may aggravate other signs and symptoms of hypogonadism, potentially influencing a patient's choice of primary treatment for his tumor. METHOD: Three to eight years after primary treatment for localized prostate carcinoma, serologic evaluation for hypogonadism was undertaken in 33 men who had received EBRT and in 55 similar men who had received radical prostatectomy (RP). No subjects had developed recognized tumor recurrence, and none had undergone hormonal treatment since primary therapy. RESULTS: Among men of similar age, prior treatment with EBRT was associated with significantly more frequent hypogonadism than prior treatment with RP. In men with EBRT, total testosterone levels averaged 27.3% less, free testosterone levels 31.6% less, dihydrotestosterone levels 33.4% less, luteinizing hormone (LH) levels 52.7% greater, and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels 100% greater than those values in men who had prior treatment with RP. Differences between postradiation and postsurgical men in LH and FSH levels were most prominent in men older than 70 years. CONCLUSIONS: Three to eight years after primary treatment for prostate carcinoma, striking hormone differences were present between men who had received EBRT to the prostate bed and those with prior RP. These differences strongly suggested that prominent and permanent testicular damage was sustained during EBRT, frequently severe enough to cause hypogonadism.     

Treatment failure after primary and salvage therapy for prostate cancer: likelihood, patterns of care, and outcomes

BACKGROUND: The authors report the likelihood of treatment failure and the outcomes after salvage therapy among men with prostate cancer who initially either received external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) or underwent radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS: Using a national disease registry, the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urological Research Endeavor (CaPSURE) database, 5277 men with prostate cancer were identified who initially either underwent RP (4342 men) or received EBRT (935 men). Outcomes after disease recurrence and subsequent salvage therapy were assessed. RESULTS.: Recurrent disease developed in 1590 men (30%), including 1003 patients (23%) in the RP group and 587 patients (63%) in the EBRT group, at a mean of 34 months and 38 months, respectively (P= .003). Patients who had recurrent disease had greater rates of overall death (19% vs 3%; P< .01) and bone metastases (15% vs 1%; P< .01). Data after salvage therapy were available for 1050 patients (620 men in the RP group and 430 men in the EBRT group). Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) was the most common salvage treatment in both groups. Overall, 420 men in the RP group (68%) and 319 men in the EBRT group (74%) failed salvage therapy at mean of 43.6 months and 43.8 months, respectively (P= .95). These patients had a greater overall death rate than the 311 patients who did not fail salvage therapy (24.8% vs 6.9%, respectively; P< .001). No survival benefit in terms of prostate cancer-related death (P= .91) was identified with any particular combination of primary and salvage therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Disease recurrence developed in 30% of patients who were treated for prostate cancer, and ADT was the most common salvage therapy used. Patients who failed salvage therapy had worse overall survival, and no survival benefit was noted for any particular combination of primary and salvage therapy.     

A systematic review of randomised controlled trials of radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer

BackgroundProstate cancer is the second most frequently diagnosed cancer and the sixth leading cause of cancer death in males. A systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of radiotherapy and other non-pharmacological management options for localised prostate cancer was undertaken.MethodsA search of thirteen databases was carried out until March 2014. RCTs comparing radiotherapy (brachytherapy (BT) or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT)) to other management options i.e. radical prostatectomy (RP), active surveillance, watchful waiting, high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), or cryotherapy; each alone or in combination, e.g. with adjuvant hormone therapy (HT), were included.Methods followed guidance by the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and the Cochrane Collaboration. Indirect comparisons were calculated using the Bucher method.ResultsThirty-six randomised controlled trials (RCTs, 134 references) were included. EBRT, BT and RP were found to be effective in the management of localised prostate cancer. While higher doses of EBRT seem to be related to favourable survival-related outcomes they might, depending on technique, involve more adverse events, e.g. gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity. Combining EBRT with hormone therapy shows a statistically significant advantage regarding overall survival when compared to EBRT alone (Relative risk 1.21, 95% confidence interval 1.12–1.30). Aside from mixed findings regarding urinary function, BT and radical prostatectomy were comparable in terms of quality of life and biochemical progression-free survival while favouring BT regarding patient satisfaction and sexual function.There might be advantages of EBRT (with/without HT) compared to cryoablation (with/without HT). No studies on HIFU were identified.ConclusionsBased on this systematic review, there is no strong evidence to support one therapy over another as EBRT, BT and RP can all be considered as effective monotherapies for localised disease with EBRT also effective for post-operative management. All treatments have unique adverse events profiles. Further large, robust RCTs which report treatment-specific and treatment combination-specific outcomes in defined prostate cancer risk groups following established reporting standards are needed. These will strengthen the evidence base for newer technologies, help reinforce current consensus guidelines and establish greater standardisation across practices.     

A prospective quality-of-life study in men with clinically localized prostate carcinoma treated with radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, or interstitial brachytherapy

PURPOSE: To prospectively assess the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and changes in HRQOL during the first year after 3 different treatments for clinically localized prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ninety men with T1-T2 adenocarcinoma of the prostate were treated with curative intent between May 1998 and June 1999 and completed a quality-of-life Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) questionnaire before treatment (T0) and 1 month (T1), 3 months (T3), and 12 months (T12) after treatment. Forty-four men were treated with permanent source interstitial brachytherapy (IB), 23 received external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), and 23 men were treated with radical prostatectomy (RP). The mean age of the entire study population was 65.9 years (median 67, range 42-79). The mean pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level of the entire study population was 6.81 ng/mL (median 6.25, range 1.33-19.6). The Gleason score was 相似文献   

Longitudinal assessment of changes in sexual function and bother in patients treated with external beam radiotherapy or brachytherapy, with and without neoadjuvant androgen ablation: data from CaPSURE

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), with or without brachytherapy (BT) boost or brachytherapy monotherapy with and without short-term androgen ablation (<==6 months; STAD) on sexual function (SF) and sexual bother (SB) in men treated for localized prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 992 men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer enrolled in the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urological Research Endeavor database were studied to assess treatment-related changes in SF and SB. Six treatment subgroups (EBRT - STAD, EBRT + STAD, BT - STAD, BT + STAD, EBRT + BT - STAD, EBRT + BT + STAD) were compared. RESULTS: The greatest reported changes in SF occurred during the first 2 posttreatment years. Patients receiving BT reported greater SF and the least change in SF overall; those receiving EBRT + BT reported the greatest decline in SF. SF scores associated with STAD were initially lower than in patients without STAD; however by 1 year no statistically significant difference in SF or SB was noted. CONCLUSION: Each treatment for prostate cancer can negatively affect SF and SB. Initial differences among treatment subgroups exist, but diminish with time. SF changes associated with EBRT +/- BT were statistically significant and those for BT were not. STAD appeared to confer only temporary and recoverable impairment of erectile function.     

Intraoperative electrophysiological confirmation of neurovascular bundle preservation during radical prostatectomy: long-term assessment of urinary and sexual function

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the longitudinal recovery of urinary and sexual function after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RP) using an intraoperative electrophysiological test to confirm the functional preservation of the neurovascular bundle (NVB). METHODS: A total of 70 patients who underwent RP for localized prostate cancer were prospectively enrolled in our survey. During RP, electrophysiological testing was performed to confirm the NVB preservation. The NVB was electrostimulated and the responses were observed by monitoring the intracavernous or intraurethral pressure changes. All patients were classified into three groups according to the degree of nerve-sparing [a bilateral nerve-sparing group (BNS), a unilateral nerve-sparing group (UNS) and a non-nerve-sparing group (NNS)] based on the macroanatomical as well as the electrophysiological assessment. Both urinary and sexual function were measured before and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after RP by a self-administered questionnaire. RESULTS: The concordance rate of nerve-sparing or non-nerve-sparing between the electrophysiological and macroanatomical assessment was 80%. According to the electrophysiological data, the BNS maintained significantly better urinary function at 3 months after RP than the NNS and UNS. After 6 months, each group had almost recovered continence. When considering sexual function, the BNS showed better sexual function scores than the NNS throughout the post-operative periods and the UNS at 2 years. According to the macroanatomical assessment, however, these differences were significant. CONCLUSIONS: Nerve-sparing RP as confirmed by intraoperative electrophysiological test may contribute significantly to the early recovery of continence and greater rate of sexual function after RP.     

Quality of life after radical prostatectomy in Japanese men: 2 year longitudinal study

OBJECTIVE: We performed a 2 year longitudinal survey of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RP) in Japanese men with localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We measured 112 patients who underwent RP with SF-36 and University of California, Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index before and 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after surgery. RESULTS: Patients who underwent RP showed problems in some domains of general HRQOL, but these problems diminished over time. Mental health significantly improved throughout the follow-up period. The urinary function substantially declined at 3 months and continued to recover gradually but never returned to the baseline. Urinary bother at 3 months showed a significant decrease, but at 6 months it returned to baseline. The data of sexual function and bother showed a substantially lower score after RP. Patients lost their sexual desire significantly throughout the post-operative period. After 12 months, the nerve sparing group had significantly better improvement in sexual function than the non-nerve sparing group and this improvement continued up to 2 years after operation. CONCLUSION: Despite reports of problems with sexuality and urinary continence, general HRQOL was mostly unaffected by RP after 6 months. RP had a favorable impact on mental health. Although urinary function did not completely return to the baseline level even at 2 years after RP, recovery from urinary bother was rapid. RP had serious consequences on libido, erectile function and sexual activity. In the second year, the sexual function of those who underwent RP with bilateral nerve sparing procedure continued to improve.     

Treatment ‘mismatch’ in early prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: Pretreatment urinary, bowel, and sexual dysfunction may increase the toxicity of prostate cancer treatments or preclude potential benefits. Using patient-reported baseline dysfunction from a prospective cohort study, we determined the proportion of patients receiving relatively contraindicated ('mismatched') treatments. METHODS: Baseline obstructive uropathy and bowel dysfunction relatively contraindicate brachytherapy (BT) and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), respectively, because they increase patients' vulnerability to treatment-related toxicity. Baseline sexual dysfunction renders moot the intended benefit of nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (NSRP), which is to preserve sexual function. We categorized patients' clinical circumstances by increasing complexity and counted the mismatches in each, expecting weaker or multiple contraindications to increase mismatched treatments. RESULTS: Of 438 eligible patients, 389 (89%) reported preexisting dysfunction, and more than one-third received mismatched treatments. Mismatches did not significantly increase with clinical complexity, and watchful waiting was very infrequent, even when all treatment options were contraindicated. Patient age and comorbidity, but not preexisting dysfunction, were associated with treatment choice. As expected, mismatched BT and EBRT led to worsened urinary and bowel symptoms, respectively, and NSRP did not improve outcomes after baseline sexual dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment dysfunction does not appear to reliably influence treatment choices, and patients receiving mismatched treatments had worse outcomes. Further study is needed to determine why mismatched treatments were chosen, including the role of incomplete patient-physician communication of baseline dysfunction, and whether using a validated questionnaire before treatment decision-making would bypass this difficulty. Treatment mismatch may be a useful outcome indicator of the quality of patient-centered decisions.     

Patients' perceptions of quality of life after treatment for early prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Treatment for early prostate cancer produces problematic physical side effects, but prior studies have found little influence on patients' perceived health status. We examined psychosocial outcomes of treatment for early prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with previously treated prostate cancer and a reference group of men with a normal prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and no history of prostate cancer completed questionnaires. Innovative scales assessed behavioral consequences of urinary dysfunction, sexuality, health worry, PSA concern, perceived cancer control, treatment decision making, decision regret, and cancer-related outlook. Urinary, bowel, and sexual dysfunction were assessed with symptom indexes; health status was assessed by the Physical and Mental Summaries of the Short Form (SF-12) Health Survey. RESULTS: Compared with men without prostate cancer, prostate cancer patients reported greater urinary, bowel, and sexual dysfunction, but similar health status. They reported worse problems of urinary control, sexual intimacy and confidence, and masculinity, and greater PSA concern. Perceptions of cancer control and treatment decisions were positive, but varied by treatment: prostatectomy patients indicated the highest and observation patients indicated the lowest cancer control. Bowel and sexual dysfunction were associated with poorer sexual intimacy, masculinity, and perceived cancer control; masculinity and PSA concern were associated with greater confidence in treatment choice; and diminished sexual intimacy and less interest in PSA were associated with greater regret. CONCLUSION: The lack of change in global measures of health status after treatment for early prostate cancer obscures important influences in men's lives; cancer diagnosis and treatment complications may result in complex outcomes. Aggressive treatment may confer confidence in cancer control, yet be countered by diminished intimate relationships and masculinity, which accompany sexual dysfunction.     

Prospective evaluation of urinary and intestinal side effects after BeamCath stereotactic dose-escalated radiotherapy of prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: New data suggest that a higher radiation dose will improve outcome in treatment of localized prostate cancer. External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) may on the other hand induce disturbances in the patient's urinary and intestinal function. Since 1997, 195 patients have been treated with a stereotactic boost of 4-8 Gy added to conventional 70 Gy EBRT. Late side effects were prospectively evaluated 3 years after dose-escalated EBRT. METHODS: Urinary and intestinal problems were prospectively evaluated with a validated self-assessment questionnaire, the Prostate Cancer Symptom Scale (PCSS). Two hundred and eighty-seven patients completed the questionnaire at the 1 year follow-up, and 153 at 3 years after treatment. Pre-treatment mean age was 66 years. One hundred and sixty-eight patients were treated with the conformal technique and 195 were treated with the dose-escalated stereotactic BeamCath technique. Mean total dose in the conformal group (< or =70 Gy) was 66 Gy (60.8-70.4 Gy). The dose-escalated group consists of three dose levels, 74 Gy (n = 68), 76 Gy (n = 74), and 78 Gy (n = 53). RESULTS: Analyzing the whole population 3 years after treatment, urgency and starting problems decreased in comparison to pre-treatment. A minor increase in urinary incontinence was reported 3 years after treatment in comparison to pre-treatment. No increases in other urinary symptoms were reported. Intestinal symptoms were slightly increased during the follow-up period in comparison to pre-treatment. Dose escalation with stereotactic EBRT (74-78 Gy) did not increase gastrointestinal or genitourinary late side effects at 1 year or 3 years in comparison to doses < or =70 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: The stereotactic BeamCath EBRT technique facilitates safe dose escalation of patients with prostate cancer.     

Long-term quality of life among localised prostate cancer survivors: QALIPRO population-based study

BackgroundTo evaluate quality of life (QoL) 10 years after treatments for localised prostate cancer (LPCa) patients in comparison with aged-matched healthy controls.MethodsLPCa patients diagnosed in 2001 were obtained from 11 French cancer registries. Controls were recruited among the general population and were matched to patients on age and geographic area. EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire – Core 30 items, Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory self-reported questionnaires were used to measure QoL, anxiety and fatigue. Patients were classified in three groups according to previous treatments: radical prostatectomy (RP), radiotherapy (RT) and radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy (RP+RT). The differences in QoL between patients and controls and according to treatment groups were evaluated.ResultsThere were 287 patients and 287 controls. There was no socio-demographic difference between patients and controls. Treatments were: RP (143), RT (78), PR+RT (33), baseline hormone therapy (49) and hormone therapy at the time of the study (34). Patients had similar levels of global QoL, anxiety, depression and fatigue as controls. They reported more urinary troubles (urinary function and incontinence) (p < 0.0001) and more sexual dysfunctions (p < 0.0001) than controls, whatever the treatment group. Worse bowel dysfunction was reported in patients treated by RT and RP+RT (p < 0.002). According to the treatments, RP groups had the worst urinary function and incontinence (p < 0.01), and reported more bowel bother when the treatment was combined with RT.ConclusionsEven though patients reported similar global QoL as control 10 years after treatment, patients reported numerous urinary and sexual dysfunctions. Patients treated with RP+RT reported cumulative sequelae of both treatments.     

Complications from treatment for prostate carcinoma among men in the Detroit area

BACKGROUND: Aggressive treatment of early stage prostate carcinoma (PC) is limited primarily to two modalities: radical prostatectomy (RP) and external beam radiation therapy (RT). The authors conducted a population-based study of Detroit area men with localized PC to determine the outcome of bowel, urinary, and sexual function after aggressive treatment. METHODS: Men with PC were identified through the Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System, a member of the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Patients participated in interviews about their pretreatment bowel, urinary, and sexual function approximately 9 months after treatment. The same men were asked identical questions about their function an average of 2 years after treatment. Treatment outcomes were compared for men who underwent RP and men who received RT. RESULTS: Of 501 men, 398 (79.4%) participated in both interviews, 304 of whom (76.4%) had localized PC and had been treated at least 1 year previously (median, 688 days). One hundred thirty men underwent RP, and 115 men received RT. The proportion of men in the RP group who reported an increase in incontinence symptoms was significant (53.8% compared with 19.2% in the RT group; P < 0.001). Men in the RT group reported increased loose stools between the pretreatment and post-treatment interviews (5.2% vs. 29.6%; P < 0.001). Men in both the RT group and the RP group reported increases in impotence from 40% to > 75% (P < 0.001 for both). Men in the RT group were 3.6 times more likely to have bowel incontinence compared with men in the RP group (odds ratio [OR], 3.61; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.54-8.47). Urinary incontinence (OR, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.52-5.44) and erection difficulty (OR, 3.98; 95% CI, 1.35-11.70) were more likely among men in the RP group. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients may have recalled their baseline function as better than it was, the current results are consistent with other population-based studies of treatment outcomes among men with localized PC. They indicate that the side effects associated with treatment are greater than those based on case series. Physicians and patients should be aware of these population-based outcomes and should use them as part of the decision-making process regarding the treatment options for men with PC.     

Stereotactic body radiotherapy as boost for organ-confined prostate cancer

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) boost following external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for advanced localized prostate cancer may reduce toxicity while escalating the dose. We present preliminary biochemical control and urinary, rectal and sexual toxicities for 73 patients treated with SBRT as a boost to EBRT. Forty-one intermediate- and 32 high-risk localized prostate cancer patients received 45 Gy EBRT with SBRT boost. Twenty-eight patients (38.3%) received a total SBRT boost dose of 18 Gy (3 fractions of 6 Gy), 28 patients (38.3%) received 19.5 Gy (3 fractions of 6.5 Gy), and 17 patients (23.2%) received 21 Gy (3 fractions of 7 Gy). Toxicity was assessed using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group urinary and rectal toxicity scale. Biochemical failure was assessed using the Phoenix definition. The median follow-up was 33 months (range, 22 - 43 months). Less than 7% Grade II and no higher grade acute toxicities occurred. To date, one Grade III and no Grade IV late toxicities occurred. For the 97% of patients with 24 months minimum follow-up, 71.8% achieved a PSA nadir threshold of 0.5 ng/mL. Three intermediate-risk and seven high-risk biochemical failures occurred; one high-risk patient died of his cancer. Three-year actuarial biochemical control rates were 89.5% and 77.7% for intermediate- and high-risk patients, respectively. SBRT boost for prostate cancer treatment is safe and feasible with minimal acute toxicity. At 33 months late toxicity and biochemical control are promising. Long-term durability of these findings remains to be established.     

Radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy <72 Gy, external beam radiotherapy > or =72 Gy, permanent seed implantation, or combined seeds/external beam radiotherapy for stage T1-T2 prostate cancer

PURPOSE: To review the biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) rates after treatment with permanent seed implantation (PI), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) <72 Gy (EBRT <72), EBRT > or =72 Gy (EBRT > or =72), combined seeds and EBRT (COMB), or radical prostatectomy (RP) for clinical Stage T1-T2 localized prostate cancer treated between 1990 and 1998. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study population comprised 2991 consecutive patients treated at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation or Memorial Sloan Kettering at Mercy Medical Center. All cases had pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (iPSA) levels and biopsy Gleason scores (bGSs). Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation for < or =6 months was given in 622 cases (21%). No adjuvant therapy was given after local therapy. RP was used for 1034 patients (35%), EBRT <72 for 484 (16%), EBRT > or =72 for 301 (10%), PI for 950 (32%), and COMB for 222 patients (7%). The RP, EBRT <72, EBRT > or =72, and 154 PI patients were treated at Cleveland Clinic Foundation. The median radiation doses in EBRT <72 and EBRT > or =72 case was 68.4 and 78.0 Gy, respectively. The median follow-up time for all cases was 56 months (range 12-145). The median follow-up time for RP, EBRT <72, EBRT > or =72, PI, and COMB was 66, 75, 49, 47, and 46 months, respectively. Biochemical relapse was defined as PSA levels >0.2 for RP cases and three consecutive rising PSA levels (American Society for Therapeutic Radiology Oncology consensus definition) for all other cases. A multivariate analysis for factors affecting the bRFS rates was performed using the following variables: clinical T stage, iPSA, bGS, androgen deprivation, year of treatment, and treatment modality. The multivariate analysis was repeated excluding the EBRT <72 cases. RESULTS: The 5-year bRFS rate for RP, EBRT <72, EBRT > or =72, PI, and COMB was 81%, 51%, 81%, 83%, and 77%, respectively (p <0.001). The 7-year bRFS rate for RP, EBRT <72, EBRT > or =72, PI, and COMB was 76%, 48%, 81%, 75%, and 77%, respectively. Multivariate analysis, including all cases, showed iPSA (p <0.001), bGS (p <0.001), year of therapy (p <0.001), and treatment modality (p <0.001) to be independent predictors of relapse. Because EBRT <72 cases had distinctly worse outcomes, the analysis was repeated after excluding these cases to discern any differences among the other modalities. The multivariate analysis excluding the EBRT <72 cases revealed iPSA (p <0.001), bGS (p <0.001), and year of therapy (p = 0.001) to be the only independent predictors of relapse. Treatment modality (p = 0.95), clinical T stage (p = 0.09), and androgen deprivation (p = 0.56) were not independent predictors for failure. CONCLUSION: The biochemical failure rates were similar among PI, high-dose (> or =72 Gy) EBRT, COMB, and RP for localized prostate cancer. The outcomes were significantly worse for low-dose (<72 Gy) EBRT.     

External beam radiotherapy for clinically node-negative, localized hormone-refractory prostate cancer: impact of pretreatment PSA value on radiotherapeutic outcomes

PURPOSE: To analyze the results of clinically node-negative, localized hormone-refractory prostate cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and to investigate the potential prognostic factors that influenced the therapeutic outcome. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifty-three patients who had developed localized hormone-refractory prostate cancer were treated with EBRT between 1994 and 2001. According to the 1992 American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical stage, 4 patients had T2 and 49 had T3 at the start of RT, and 14 patients had a Gleason score <7, 14 had a Gleason score of 7, and 23 had a Gleason score of 8-10. All patients were treated with EBRT using the unblocked oblique four-field technique, with a total dose of 69 Gy. The fraction dose was 3 Gy three times weekly. The median follow-up after RT was 35 months (range, 8-96 months) and after androgen ablation was 73 months (range, 42-156 months). RESULTS: Of 53 patients, 15 patients subsequently developed clinical relapse, including locoregional and/or distant metastases. The site of first relapse was bone metastasis in 10, lymph nodes in 3, and local failure in 2 patients; 3 patients died of prostate cancer during the analysis period. The 3-year and 5-year cause-specific survival rate was 94% and 87%, respectively, and the 3-year and 5-year clinical relapse-free survival rate was 78% and 56%, respectively. The univariate analysis revealed that a short prostate-specific antigen (PSA) doubling time and high PSA value at the start of RT and a high Gleason score were statistically significant factors for the risk of clinical relapse. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the PSA value (PSA or=15 ng/mL) at the start of RT was an independent prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: EBRT could be a treatment of choice for clinically node-negative, localized, hormone-refractory prostate cancer.