Importance of Heart Rate Response During Exercise in Patients Using Atrioventricular Synchronous and Ventricular Pacemakers

Atrioventricular synchronous pacing offers advantages over fixed-rate ventricular (VVI) pacing both at rest and during exercise. This study compared the hemodynamic effects at rest and exercise of ventricular pacing at a rate of 70 beats/min, ventricular pacing where the rate was increased during exercise and dual chamber pacing. Ten patients, age 63 +/- 8 years, with multiprogrammable DDD pacemakers were studied using supine bicycle radionuclide ventriculography. Radionuclide data during dual chamber pacing was acquired at rest and during a submaximal workload of 200-400 kpm/min. The pacemakers were then programmed to VVI pacing at a rate of 70 beats/min, and 1 week later, studies were repeated in the VVI mode at rest, during exercise at a rate of 70 beats/min, and during exercise with the VVI pacemaker programmed to a rate adapted to the DDD pacing exercise rate. At rest, the cardiac output was lower in the VVI compared with the AV sequential mode (4.1 +/- 1.1 vs 5.7 +/- 1.1 1/min, P less than 0.01). During exercise, the cardiac output increased from resting values in the DDD and VVI pacing modes, however cardiac output in the rate-adapted VVI mode was higher than in the VVI mode with the rate maintained at 70 beats/min (8.1 +/- 1.5 vs 6.3 +/- 1.1 1/min, P = 0.02). Three patients completed lower workloads with VVI pacing at 70 beats/min compared with AV synchronous pacing. At rest, AV sequential pacing was superior to VVI pacing, suggesting the importance of the atrial contribution to ventricular filling. With VVI pacing during exercise, cardiac output was improved with an increased pacemaker rate, suggesting that the heart rate response during exercise was the major determinant of the higher cardiac output.     

QT Sensing Rate Responsive Pacing Compared to Fixed Rate Ventricular Inhibited Pacing: A Controlled Clinical Study

Eighteen patients, five women and 13 men, (mean age 70 +/- S.E.M. 2 years) treated with QT sensing rate responsive pacemakers due to symptomatic high degree AV block took part in a double-blind study, comparing the rate responsive (TX) mode with fixed rate ventricular inhibited (VVI) pacing. The pacemaker was blindly programmed to either mode in a cross-over design. During the 1 month period a daily diary of symptoms (chest pain, vertigo, dyspnea, and palpitations) was kept. At the end of each period, a mental stress test and an exercise test were performed. The patient rated the general well-being and stated a preference for one of the modes. In the TX mode the heart rate was significantly higher at the end of exercise compared with VVI (107 +/- 4 vs 73 +/- 3 bpm; P less than 0.001) and the exercise tolerance was improved by 9% (104 +/- 8 vs 96 +/- 7 W; P less than 0.01). The patients reported significantly less dyspnea and fatigue at comparable workloads with TX pacing. During the mental stress test the pacing rate increased by 10% in the TX mode (from 73 +/- 2 to 82 +/- 4 bpm; P less than 0.001). There was a physiological rate variability on 24-hour Holter monitoring. Ten patients reported a significant improvement in feeling of general well-being in the TX mode. Eleven patients preferred the TX mode, five patients could not distinguish between the modes and two patients preferred the VVI mode due to worsening of angina pectoris with TX pacing. This preference for the TX mode was significant (P less than 0.05). The results of this controlled study indicate that TX is preferable to VVI in most cases, but the worsening of angina pectoris in two of the patients and the occurrence of rapid rate oscillations in a third patient are factors that warrant some caution in selecting patients.     

Assessment of the Work Capacity and Relationship Between Rate Response and Exercise Tolerance Associated With Activity-Sensing Rate-Responsive Ventricular Pacing

The relationship between rate response and exercise tolerance was studied by measuring the symptom-limited maximum treadmill time (MTT)both during fixed rate VVI pacing and during VVI + activity mode pacing (RRP) in 15 patients (mean age, 73 years) who had received rate-responsive ventricular pacemakers. Their indications were atrioventricular block, sino-atrial block, and atrial fibrillation with slow ventricular response. Basic rate was programmed to 60 ppm in both pacing modes; rate response and activity threshold were programmed to 5 and medium, respectively. The order in which the two pacing modes were tested was randomly determined. The MTT was, on average, 29% longer in RRP than in VVI mode with a mean of 12 minutes in VVI and 14.8 minutes in RRP (p less than 0.001). For the subgroup of eight patients with paced-only rhythm the average increase in MTT was 38% with a mean of 9.5 minutes in VVI and 12.8 minutes in RRP (p less than 0.01). Seven patients who showed episodes of spontaneous rhythm, increased their average MTT by 17% (mean in VVI, 14.9 minutes; in RRP, 17.1 minutes; p less than 0.02). During RRP, a significant positive correlation existed between MTT and the increase in heart rate (N = 15; r = 0.83; p less than 0.001). In 12 patients with paced-only rhythm, the pacing rate remained at the programmed basic rate when the patients were lying, sitting, and standing and increased to 86 +/- 4 ppm during casual walking, and to 101 +/- 4 ppm during jumping up and down with the pacemaker programmed to the above-mentioned parameters. The maximum pacing rate during jumping corresponded with the maximum pacing rates measured from Holter recordings during normal daily activities.     

Holter-Monitored Heart Rhythm During Atrioventricular Synchronous and Fixed-Rate Ventricular Pacing

The purpose of this investigation was to study rate variability during normal everyday activities among physiologically paced patients. A comparison of the spontaneous occurrence of arrhythmias with ventricular inhibited pacing was also made. VDD pacemakers in 44 patients were randomly programmed to three-week long periods of VVI (70 bpm) or VDD (back-up rate 40-50 bpm, upper rate 125-150 bpm) pacing, respectively. A Holter ECG was recorded during the last 24 hours of each period. Although the total number of QRS complexes was similar in the two pacing modes (4.3 X 10(6)/24 hours), the rate span was extensively utilized during VDD pacing. During VDD pacing, only five patients of 39 with a programmed upper rate of 150 bpm reached this limit, while one of five with 125 bpm reached that rate. Occasional episodes of pacing at the back-up rate of 40 or 50 bpm were recorded in 33 patients. Episodes of asymptomatic rhythm disturbances were recorded in both pacing modes. No significant differences existed as regards ventricular tachyarrhythmias between the two modes of pacing and it did not seem that the incidence was higher than could be expected in a patient population of the present age. Since severe AV block does not permit conduction of atrial impulses during VVI pacing, no direct comparison between the two pacing modes can be made concerning atrial tachyarrhythmias. Only one episode of pacemaker-mediated SVT was found, and this was unsymptomatic.     

Myocardial Demands of Atrial-Triggered Versus Fixed-Rate Ventricular Pacing in Patients with Complete Heart Block

Hemodynamics, myocardial oxygen consumption, and lactate concentration were determined by cardiac catheterization at rest and during exercise in eight patients treated with AV universal pacemakers (DDD) for high degree AV block. The pulse generator was alternately programmed in ventricular inhibited (VVI) or atrial synchronous (VAT) mode. During VVI pacing, the cardiac output rose between rest and exercise (4.3-7.6 L/min) due to increased stroke volume. VAT pacing gave significantly greater increase (4.5-8.8 L/min) which, as the stroke volume was unchanged, resulted from accelerated heart rate. The myocardial oxygen consumption and the coronary blood flow did not differ between VVI and VAT mode at rest or during exercise, nor did the modes make a difference in arterial systolic and pulmonary wedge pressures. These observations suggested that VAT pacing offers higher cardiac output than VVI pacing, but with similar demands on myocardial oxygen consumption.     

Single versus dual chamber pacing in the young: noninvasive comparative evaluation of cardiac function

The advantages of atrial synchrony over asynchronous ventricular pacing remain unclear in the young, chronically right ventricular (RV) - paced patient. This is in contrast to the older patient with inherent diastolic dysfunction who has been shown to benefit from atrial synchrony with dual chamber (DDD,R/VDD), over single chamber rate response (VVI,R) ventricular pacing. The goal of this study was to noninvasively assess cardiac function in a group of young, RV-paced patients before and after establishment of atrial synchrony. Echocardiographic data were retrospectively analyzed from 10 patients with congenital or acquired complete AV block, who were VVI,R paced for 10.2 +/- 2 years (mean age at study 19.2 +/- 8.9 years), and were subsequently converted to DDD,R/VDD pacing (mean age at study 20.7 +/- 9.5 years). Paired t-test analysis of left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic function during VVI,R versus DDD,R/VDD pacing did not result in any short-term difference in LV short axis fractional area of change or FAC (53% +/- 7.5% vs 56.8% +/- 8.7%) or mitral maximal velocity (E) normalized to mitral flow velocity time integral (VTI) (5.2/s +/- 1.5 vs 4.4/s +/- 1.5). A decrease in mitral flow E/A ratio was observed after short-term DDD,R/VDD pacing (2.2 +/- 0.5 vs 1.9 +/- 0.3). Atrial synchronous dual chamber pacing in young patients with complete AV block does not lead to any appreciable early change in global LV function over single-site RV pacing. Therefore, early establishment of atrial synchrony in the young asymptomatic VVI,R-paced patient with normal intrinsic ventricular function may not be warranted.     

Clinical Problems in Atrial Synchronous Ventricular Inhibited Pacing: A Long-term Follow-up of 54 Patients

Fifty-four VDD-paced patients were followed for more than 12 months; they were studied retrospectively in order to assess possible clinical problems and their management. The patients were between 19 and 84 years of age (mean, 66 +/- 11). Twenty-four of the 54 received a VDD pacemaker as a primary implant and 30 had had VVI pacemakers which were changed to VDD mainly because of limited exercise tolerance or symptoms of AV asynchrony. The follow-up time was between 12 and 69 months (mean, 39 +/- 17). Pacemaker and lead problems were neither frequent nor serious. Six patients had spontaneous paroxysmal supraventricular tachyarrhythmias, four had pacemaker-mediated supraventricular tachycardias and six had ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Treatment of tachyarrhythmias included drugs, DC conversion, reprogramming, or combinations of these measures. Frequency of hospitalization was not greater than expected. In conclusion, VDD pacing appears safe and reliable, with problems mainly associated with the underlying cardiac disease rather than to the pacing mode itself.     

The Effects of Rate-Adaptive Atrial Pacing Versus Ventricular Backup Pacing on Exercise Capacity in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Background: Atrial rate-adaptive pacing may improve cardiopulmonary reserve in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.
Methods: A randomized, blinded, single-crossover design enrolled dual-chamber implantable defibrillator recipients without pacing indications and an ejection fraction ≤40% to undergo cardiopulmonary exercise treadmill stress testing in both atrial rate-adaptive pacing (AAIR) and ventricular demand pacing (VVI) pacing modes. The primary endpoint was change in peak oxygen consumption (VO₂). Secondary endpoints were changes in anaerobic threshold, perceived exertion, exercise duration, and peak blood pressure.
Results: Ten patients, nine males, eight with New York Heart Association class I, mean ejection fraction 24 ± 7%, were analyzed. Baseline VO₂ was 3.6 ± 0.5 mL/kg/min. Heart rate at peak exercise was significantly higher during AAIR versus VVI pacing (142 ± 18 vs 130 ± 23 bpm; P = 0.05). However, there was no difference in peak VO₂ (AAIR 23.7 ± 6.1 vs VVI 23.8 ± 6.3 mL/kg/min; P = 0.8), anaerobic threshold (AAIR 1.3 ± 0.3 vs VVI 1.2 ± 0.2 L/min; P = 0.11), rate of perceived exertion (AAIR 7.3 ± 1.5 vs VVI 7.8 ± 1.2; P = 0.46), exercise duration (AAIR 15 minutes, 46 seconds ± 2 minutes, 54 seconds vs VVI 16 minutes, 3 seconds ± 2 minutes, 48 seconds; P = 0.38), or peak systolic blood pressure (AAIR 155 ± 22 vs VVI 153 ± 21; P = 0.61) between the two pacing modes.
Conclusion: In this study, AAIR pacing did not improve peak VO_2, anaerobic threshold, rate of perceived exertion, or exercise duration compared to VVI backup pacing in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and no pacing indications.     

Improvement of exercise tolerance by single lead VDD pacemaker: evaluation using cardiopulmonary exercise test

We used a cardiopulmonary test to assess the physiological benefit of single lead VDD pacing in ten patients (six men, four women; aged 32-84 years, mean 69 years) with atrioventricular block. Maximal symptom-limited treadmill exercise test using a ramp protocol was performed under VDD and VVIR or VVI pacing (VVI) in random sequence. The pacemaker was then programmed to the VDD mode, and Holter ECG was recorded in nine patients. Compared with findings during the VVI, the VDD mode had a greater chronotropic response (mean maximal heart rate, VDD 106 +/- 17 beats/min vs VVI 79 +/- 19 beats/min, P = 0.03), and was associated with prolongation of exercise duration (VDD 11.2 +/- 2.9 minute vs VVI 10.5 +/- 3.1 minute; P = 0.01), and the onset of anaerobic threshold at a higher oxygen uptake (VDD 12.4 +/- 3.4 mL/min per kilogram vs VVI 10.0 +/- 2.1 mL/min per kilogram; P < 0.01). Atrial sensing was recognized in almost all normal sinus P waves for all cases examined using Holter ECG. Thus, chronotropic response during exercise by VDD pacemaker improved exercise tolerance, indicating that a VDD pacemaker might be useful for patients requiring physical activity.     

Adequacy of Pacing Rate During Exercise in Rate Responsive Ventricular Pacing

Our objective was to determint; the adequate pacing rate during exercise in ventricular pacing by measuring exercise capacity, cardiac output, and sinus node activity. Eighteen patients with complete AV block and an implanted pacemaker underwent cardiopulmonary exercise tests under three randomized pacing rates: fixed rate pacing (VVJ) at 60 beats/min and ventricular rate-responsive pacing (VVIR) programmed to attain a heart rate of about 110 beats/min ar 130 beats/min (VVIR 110 and VVIR 130, respectively) at the end of exercise. Compared with VVI and VVIR 130, VVIR 110 was associated with an increased peak oxygen uptake(VVIR 110:20.3 ± 4.5 vs VVI: 16.9 ± 3.1; P < 0.01; and VVIR 130: 19.0 ± 4.1 mL/min per kg, respectively; P < 0.05) and a higher oxygen uptake at anaerobic threshold (15.3 ± 2.7, 12.7 ± 1.9; P < 0.01, and 14.6 ± 2.6 mL/min per kg; P < 0.05). The atrial rate during exercise expressed as a percentage of the expected maximal heart rate was lower in VVIR 110 than in VVI or VVIR 130 (VVIR 110: 75.9%± 14.6% vs VVI: 90.6%± 12.8%; P < 0.01; VVIR 110 vs VVIR 130: 89.1%± 23.1%; P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in cardiac output at peak exercise between VVIR 110 and VVIR 130. We conclude that a pacing rate for submaximal exercise of 110 beats/min may be preferable to that of 130 beats/min in respect to exercise capacity and sympathetic nerve activity.     

Impact of Right Ventricular Pacing Sites on Exercise Capacity during Ventricular Rate Regularization in Patients with Permanent Atrial Fibrillation

Background: The deleterious effects of right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing may offset the potential benefit of ventricular rate (VR) regularization and rate adaptation during an exercise in patient's atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: We studied 30 patients with permanent AF and symptomatic bradycardia who receive pacemaker implantation with RVA (n = 15) or right ventricular septal (RVS, n = 15) pacing. All the patients underwent an acute cardiopulmonary exercise testing using VVI‐mode (VVI‐OFF) and VVI‐mode with VR regularization (VRR) algorithm on (VVI‐ON). Results: There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between the two groups, except pacing QRS duration was significantly shorter during RVS pacing than RVA pacing (138.9 ± 5 vs 158.4 ± 6.1 ms, P = 0.035). Overall, VVI‐ON mode increased the peak exercise VR, exercise time, metabolic equivalents (METs), and peak oxygen consumption (VO₂max), and decreased the VR variability compared with VVI‐OFF mode during exercise (P < 0.05), suggesting that VRR pacing improved exercise capacity during exercise. However, further analysis on the impact of VRR pacing with different pacing sites revealed that only patients with RVS pacing but not patients with RVA pacing had significant increased exercise time, METs, and VO₂max during VVI‐ON compared with VVI‐OFF, despite similar changes in peaked exercise VR and VR variability. Conclusion: In patients with permanent AF, VRR pacing at RVS, but not at RVA, improved exercise capacity during exercise.     

Importance of ventricular rate after mode switching during low intensity exercise as assessed by clinical symptoms and ventilatory gas exchange

Automatic mode switching from DDD(R) to DDI(R) or VVI(R) pacing modes has improved dual chamber pacing in patients at high risk for supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. However, little is known about the effect of ventricular pacing rate adaptation after mode switching. We conducted a single-blinded, crossover study in 15 patients (58 +/- 21 years) with a DDD pacemaker who had AV block and normal sinus node function to investigate the influence of pacing rate adaptation to intrinsic heart rate during low intensity exercise. Patients performed two tests (A/B) of low intensity treadmill exercise (0.5 W/kg) in randomized order. They initially walked for 6 minutes while paced in DDD mode. The pacing mode was then switched to VVI with a pacing rate of either 70 beats/min (test A) or matched to the intrinsic heart rate (95 +/- 11 beats/min test B). Respiratory gas exchange variables were determined and patients classified the effort before and after mode switching on a Borg scale from 6 to 20. Percentage changes of respiratory gas exchange measurements were significantly larger (O2 consumption: -8.2 +/- 5.0% vs. -0.6 +/- 7.2%; ventilatory equivalent of CO2 exhalation: 5.3 +/- 4.9% vs. 1.5 +/- 4.3%; respiratory exchange ratio: 7.0 +/- 2.2% vs. 3.5 +/- 3.0%; end-tidal CO2: -5.7 +/- 2.9% vs. -1.8 +/- 2.7%; all P < 0.01) and the increase in subjective assessment of the effort tended to be higher (mean increase on Borg scale: 1.6 +/- 1.9 vs. 1.1 +/- 1.8, P = 0.07) after heart rate unadjusted than after adjusted mode switching. Mode switching from DDD to VVI pacing is better tolerated and gas exchange measurements are less influenced if ventricular pacing rate is adjusted to the level of physical activity. Thus, pacing rate adjustment should be considered as part of automatic mode switch algorithms.     

Efficacy and Safety of Rate Responsive Pacing in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease and Angina Pectoris

The present study included 17 patients with angina pectoris and coronary artery disease in whom a rate responsive ventricular pacemaker (Medtronic Activitrax) had been implanted. All patients had an exclusively paced rhythm. Single blinded, random, cross-over treadmill tests in the rate responsive pacing mode (VVIR) and in the fixed-rate demand mode (VVI) were performed, with an interval of 4-6 weeks. Mean exercise duration increased by 25% during VVIR pacing. Maximal heart rate increased significantly during VVIR compared to VVI pacing (VVI = 74 +/- 2 bpm, VVIR = 116 +/- 8 bpm, P less than 0.001) as did the rate-pressure product (VVI = 10.850 +/- 1,124, VVIR = 16.628 +/- 2,110, P less than 0.001). Despite improved performance, the number of anginal attacks per week and the nitroglycerin consumption did not show a significant difference between the two pacing modes. It is concluded that rate responsive pacing is beneficial and safe in patients with angina pectoris and coronary artery disease.     

Atrial Synchronized Ventricular Pacing: Contribution of the Chronotropic Response to Improved Exercise Performance

In contrast to asynchronous ventricular pacing (VOO, VVI), alrial synchronized ventricular pacing (VAT, VDD, DDD) maintains the normal sequence of cardiac chamber activation and permits a chronotropic response to exercise. thereby improving exercise performance. To assess the separate contributions of these two factors to improved work capacity. 14 patients with implanted programmable VAT pacemakers were exercised according to the Bruce protocol, in three different pacing modes, selected in a random orderand on a double blind basis: (a) VAT: (b) chest wall stimulation triggered ventricular (V-CWS-T) pacing, during which the pacemaker was programmed to VAT mode but driven externally using chest wall stimulation at rates fractionally above the patients'atrial rate, thereby providing a chronotropic response to exercise without atrioventricular synchronization; and (c) VOO mode at 70 beats per minute. There was a significant improvement in exercise performance in all patients during both VAT and V-CWS-T pacing as compared to VOO mode; the average increase in work capacity being similar: VAT: 44 ± 31, (range, 12 to 140) percent and V-CWS-T; 40 ± 24 (range, 5 to 85) percent. It is concluded that in patients with adaptive pacing systems, the chronotropic response is the major determinant of any improvement in exercise performance.     

Short-Term and Long-Term Changes of Left Ventricular Volumes During Rate-Adaptive and Single-Rate Pacing

To evaluate the adaptation of the heart to exercise during pacing, 15 patients with permanent endocardial pacemakers were studied; nine patients had atrioventricular universal (DDD) pacemakers (Symbios 7005) and six patients had activity detecting rate-responsive ventricular (VVIR) pacemakers (Activitrax 8403). Left ventricular function in each patient during rate variable pacing was compared to ventricular function during VVI single-rate pacing. End-systolic and end-diastolic volume changes during exercise were measured by radionuclide angiography and the amount of volume change was used to assess left ventricular function. Both short-term (within 4 hours) and long-term measurements (after at least 4 weeks) were made at rest and at 50% of the maximal exercise capacity in DDD or VVIR mode and were compared with VVI single-rate pacing. All patients, when changed from DDD or VVIR mode to VVI single-rate pacing showed a significant increase of the end-diastolic volume during exercise, which increased even more after long-term VVI pacing. During long-term rate variable pacing, there was no increase of the end-diastolic volume during exercise. DDD or VVIR pacing initially showed a substantial increase of the end-systolic volume during exercise combined with a decrease of left ventricular ejection fraction, suggesting a decrease of the left ventricular contractility. After 4 weeks, contractility improved both with DDD and VVIR pacing. We conclude that short-term DDD and VVIR pacing induces a temporary impairment of left ventricular function that improves after 4 weeks, whereas long-term VVI pacing is associated with left ventricular dilatation even at moderate levels of exercise.     

Is DDD Pacing Superior to VVI,R? A Study on Cardiac Sympathetic Nerve Activity and Myocardial Oxygen Consumption at Rest and During Exercise

Rate responsive ventricular pacing (VVI,R) has been demonstrated to equal atrial synchronous ventricular pacing (DDD) with regard to hemodynamics and exercise tolerance. Whether the two modes are also comparable, with regard to cardiac metabolic effects, is not yet dear. We assessed central hemodynamics, cardiac sympathetic nerve activity fcardiac norepinephrine overflow), and myocardial oxygen consumption in 16 patients treated with rate responsive atrial synchronous ventricular pacemakers (DDD,R), due to high degree AV block. The study was performed at rest and during supine exercise at two workloads (30 ± 12 and 68 ± 24 watts, respectively) during VDD and rate matched VVI pacing (VVI_m). Ventricular rates at rest and during both workloads were almost identical. Cardiac output at rest tended to be higher in the VDD mode, due to a slightly higher stroke volume. Central pressures including right atrial pressure and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure were similar in the pacing modes. The coronary sinus blood flow, the coronary sinus arteriovenous oxygen difference, and the myocardial oxygen consumption did not differ between the two pacing modes. Cardiac norepinephrine overflow was similar in the two pacing modes, at rest or during exercise. Thus, we found no significant differences between VDD and VVI_m pacing with regard to central hemodynamics, cardiac sympathetic nerve activity (cardiac norepinephrine overflow), or myocardial oxygen consumption either at rest or during moderate exercise.     

Long-term complication rates in ventricular, single lead VDD, and dual chamber pacing

A higher incidence of pacemaker related complications has been reported in DDD systems as compared to VVI devices. The implantation of single lead VDD pacemakers might reduce the complication rate of physiological pacing in patients with AV block. In a retrospective study, the data records of 1,214 consecutive patients with pacemaker implantation for AV block between 1990 and 2001 (VVI 36.5%, DDD 32.9%, VDD 30.6%) were analyzed. Complications requiring surgical interventions were compared during a follow-up period of 64 +/- 31 months. Operation and fluoroscopic times were longer in DDD pacemaker implantation compared to VDD and VVI devices:58 +/- 23 versus 39 +/- 10 and 37 +/- 13 minutes (P<0.001), 9.2 +/- 5.2 versus 4.1 +/- 2.4 and 3.5 +/- 2.3 minutes, respectively. Differences remained significant after correction for covariates. In a multivariate Cox regression model, the corrected complication hazard of a DDD pacemaker implantation was increased by 3.9 (1.4-11.3) compared to VVI and increased by 2.3 (1.1-4.5) compared to VDD pacing. Higher complication rates in DDD pacing were mainly due to a higher incidence of early reoperation for atrial lead dysfunction, whereas the long-term complication rate was not different from VDD or VVI pacing. Early and long-term complication rates did not differ between VDD and VVI pacemaker systems. In conclusion, operation time and complication rates of physiological pacing are reduced by VDD pacemaker implantation achieving values comparable to VVI pacing. Thus, single lead VDD pacing can be recommended for patients with AV block.     

The Reliability of Rate-Pressure Product as an Index of Myocardial Oxygen Consumption in Atrial Synchronized Versus Fixed Rate Ventricular Pacing

The product of heart rate and blood pressure was tested as an index of myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO2) and compared with directly determined MVO2 during ventricular demand (VVI) fixed rate pacing and atrial synchronized (VAT) pacing at rest and during exercise. Systolic brachial artery pressure, pulmonary wedge pressure and MVO2 were similar in the two pacing modes and showed similar response to exercise. The correlation between rate-pressure product and MVO2 was closer with VAT than with VVI pacing (r = 0.74 and r = 0.64, respectively), and the latter value was not improved by using the product of atrial rate and systolic pressure (r = 0.61). The rate-pressure product was significantly higher during VAT pacing compared to VVI during exercise, although MVO2 was similar. The similarity of MVO2 during exercise indicated some other contributory factor than heart rate in VVI pacing, probably increase of contractility and/or volume. Because such factors are not included in currently used indices of MVO2 assessments must be interpreted cautiously, particularly in cases of complete heart block with VVI pacing.     

Physiological Versus Single-Rate Ventricular Pacing: A Double-Blind Cross-Over Study

Previous comparisons of physiological and single-rate ventricular pacing are mostly based on open studies. The present investigation was designed to control possible biases of such a study design with the aim to investigate effects of the two pacing modes on maximal and submaximal exercise tolerance and the subjective feeling of well-being of the patients. Forty-four patients treated with atrioventricular synchronous pacemakers for more than 12 months participated in the study. Their pacemakers were randomly programmed to one 3-week long period of ventricular inhibited and a similar period of atrioventricular synchronous ventricular inhibited pacing. Thereafter, they went through echocardiography, symptom-limited maximal exercise test and answered a questionnaire on subjective symptoms. The study was blind since neither the patients nor the physician conducting the exercise tests were informed of pacing mode. The mean maximal exercise tolerance increased 14% (p less than 0.01) on atrioventricular synchronous pacing. Arterial lactate, respiratory rates and perceived exertion ratings during submaximal levels of exercise were higher on ventricular inhibited pacing, as well as symptoms scored during the two 3-week periods. A majority of patients improved their functional class during atrioventricular synchronous pacing and preferred the physiological pacing mode.     

Efficacy of Ventricular Rate Stabilization by Right Ventricular Pacing During Atrial Fibrillation

To assess the effect of right ventricular pacing on rate regularity during exercise and daily life activities, 16 patients with sinoatrial disease and chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) were studied. Incremental ventricular pacing was commenced at 40 beats/min until > 95% of ventricular pacing were achieved during supine, sitting, and standing. Thirteen patients also underwent randomized paired submaximal exercise tests in either a fixed rate mode (VVI) or a ventricular rate stabilization (VRS) mode in which the pacingrate was set manually at 10 beats/min above the average AF rate duringthe last minute of each exercise stage. The pacing interval for rate regularization was shortest during standing (692 ± 26 ms) compared with either supine or sitting (757 ± 30 and 705 ± 26 ms, respectively, P < 0.05). During exercise, VRS pacing significantly increased the maximum rate (119 ± 5.2 vs 106 ± 4.2 ms, P < 0.05), percent of ventricular pacing (85%± 5% vs 23%± 7%, P < 0.05), rate regularity index (5.8%± 1.6% vs 13.4%± 1.9%, P < 0.05), and maximum level of oxygen consumption (12.4 ± 0.5 vs 11.3 ± 0.5 ml/kg, P < 0.05) compared with VVI pacing. There was no change in oxygen pulse or difference in symptom scores in this acute study between the two pacing modes. It is concluded that right ventricular pacing may significantly improve rate regularity and cardiopulmonary performance in patients with chronic AF. This may be incorporated in a pacing device for rate regularization of AF using an algorithm that is rate adaptive to postural and exercise stresses.