Adverse working conditions and alcohol use in men and women

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the association between adverse working conditions and abstinence and heavy drinking. METHODS: The study was a cross-sectional study within the framework of a general population survey conducted in Eindhoven, The Netherlands (N = 7533). Working conditions were classified into four domains: hazardous physical working conditions, demands at work, level of control over one's job, and support from coworkers and supervisors. Abstainers were compared with drinkers; within drinkers, heavy drinkers were compared with light-moderate drinkers, and those who reported binge drinking were compared with those who did not report binge drinking. RESULTS: Respondents who reported adverse working conditions were as likely to be abstainers as they were to be drinkers. Within drinkers, males and females who reported high hazardous physical working conditions were more likely to be heavy drinkers than to be light-moderate drinkers (light-moderate is not just an amount, but a combination of amount and frequency) and to report binge drinking (males only). Respondents who reported high demands were also more likely to be heavy drinkers than to be light-moderate drinkers. CONCLUSIONS: Stressful circumstances, such as adverse working conditions, were associated with high levels of alcohol intake among drinking men and women.     

Alcohol consumption and mortality in Alameda County

The association between level of alcohol consumption and 15-year mortality, focusing particularly on the possible protective effect of light drinking compared to abstention, was studied in a representative population sample of 6928 residents of Alameda County, California. Because abstainers differ from light, moderate and heavy drinkers on a number of demographic, physical, and psychosocial characteristics, the role of these as confounders of the alcohol/mortality association was examined. Using multiple logistic models, the mortality experience of abstainers, moderate drinkers, heavy drinkers and very heavy drinkers was compared with that of light drinkers. Among men only, very heavy drinkers were at significantly greater risk of death from all causes than were light drinkers (OR = 2.5, p less than 0.01). Neither abstainers nor other drinkers were at significantly higher risk of death from ischemic heart disease than were light drinkers. This pattern of results persisted with adjustment for 11 covariates of alcohol consumption in addition to age.     

Biphasic alcohol response differs in heavy versus light drinkers

BACKGROUND: Most studies of risk factors for alcohol-related problems have focused on biological family history as a primary risk factor. However, other factors, such as early-age heavy drinking, are also risk factors for sustained or progressive heavy consumption. Little is currently known about the mechanisms underlying binge or heavy drinking. METHODS: This study examined the acute subjective and objective effects of ethanol in heavy drinkers versus light drinkers. Thirty-four subjects participated in this within-subjects study consisting of three early-evening testing sessions in which subjects consumed a beverage containing either 0.8 or 0.4 g/kg ethanol or placebo. RESULTS: Compared with lighter drinkers, heavy drinkers were more sensitive to the positive stimulant-like effects of ethanol (p < 0.05), especially during the increasing limb of the blood alcohol curve. Heavy drinkers also showed less sedation and cortisol response after alcohol than the light drinkers (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that young adult binge drinkers show a biphasic alcohol response, with heightened sensitivity to stimulant-like alcohol effects and greater tolerance to sedative alcohol effects compared with their light-drinking counterparts.     

Alcohol's harm to others: reduced wellbeing and health status for those with heavy drinkers in their lives

Aims The impact of alcohol on those other than the drinker is an under‐researched area with important policy implications. This study is a first step in investigating relationships between exposure to heavy drinkers in respondent's lives with measures of health status and wellbeing. Design setting and participants A cross‐sectional general population survey was carried out among 3068 New Zealand residents aged 12–80 years (response rate 64%) using an in‐house computer‐assisted telephone interviewing system. Measurements Respondents' estimates of health status (European Quality of Life–5 Dimensions) and subjective wellbeing (Personal Wellbeing Index) were measured along with self‐reports of heavy drinkers in their lives, demographic variables and own drinking. Findings More than one in four of the sample had experienced someone they considered to be a heavy drinker in their environment in the past 12 months. An index of exposure to heavy drinkers, reflecting numbers of heavy drinkers and cohabitation, predicted lower health status and personal wellbeing while controlling for demographic variables and respondent's own drinking Conclusions Cross‐sectional data from a general population sample suggest that there is a relationship between exposure to heavy drinkers and reduced personal wellbeing and poorer health status. Exposure to heavy drinkers may have negative impacts for others.     

Association between alcohol intake and metabolic syndrome in patients with hypertension

The aim of this study was to determine how alcohol consumption influences metabolic syndrome in patients with hypertension. The subjects were 3938 male workers being treated with anti-hypertensive drugs and they were divided into four groups by average ethanol intake [non-, light (<22 g/day), moderate (≥22 and <44 g/day), and heavy (≥44 g/day) drinkers]. The relationships of alcohol intake with atherosclerotic risk factors and metabolic syndrome were investigated. Waist circumference and hemoglobin A1c were significantly smaller and lower, respectively, in light, moderate, and heavy drinkers than in nondrinkers. Systolic blood pressure and log-converted triglyceride were significantly higher in heavy drinkers than in nondrinkers. HDL cholesterol was significantly higher in all of the drinker groups than in nondrinkers and tended to be higher as alcohol intake increased. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome was significantly lower in light, moderate, and heavy drinkers than in nondrinkers. Age- and smoking history-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) vs. nondrinkers for metabolic syndrome were significantly low in light drinkers (OR = 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56-0.89), moderate drinkers (OR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.54-0.75) and heavy drinkers (OR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.57-0.82). The results suggest that alcohol drinking is associated with a lower risk of metabolic syndrome in patients with hypertension.     

Alcohol use among out-of-treatment crack using African-American women

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to categorize the quantity and frequency of alcohol use among African-American women who were abusing crack cocaine and to explore relationships between categories of alcohol use and demographic variables, cocaine use, comorbidity, and risky sexual behaviors. METHOD: Data were collected from 635 out-of-treatment crack cocaine-abusing African-American women in the Raleigh/Durham area of North Carolina. The women were categorized as light (n = 272), moderate (n = 216), or heavy drinkers (n = 147). RESULTS: Women classified as heavy drinkers were demographically similar to light and moderate drinkers. Heavy drinkers used more crack cocaine and were more likely to engage in sexual risk behaviors than were the other two drinking groups. The heavy drinkers also reported greater psychological distress, and they were more likely to report histories of physical, sexual, and emotional abuse. CONCLUSIONS: Heavy alcohol use among crack-abusing African-American women may be a marker for a host of underlying problems that require special attention. The HIV prevention programs and substance abuse treatment programs that provide services to crack-abusing women should screen for heavy drinking. Women identified as heavy drinkers should undergo more in-depth assessments and receive additional referrals as appropriate.     

National Survey of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Heavy Drinkers in Japan

Background: The major cause of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the general Japanese population is an infection related to hepatotropic viruses, especially hepatitis virus C (HCV). Even in heavy drinkers, the major cause of HCC is HCV infection. However, HCC without viral infection has been reported in heavy drinkers. Alcohol has been also reported to be associated with an increased risk of cancer. In this study, we investigated aspects of HCC pathogenesis in heavy drinkers in Japan. Methods: Questionnaires were sent to 1350 hospitals authorized by the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology. The questionnaires asked about the number of inpatients with the different types of alcoholic liver diseases, admitted to each hospital between 1998 and 2001. Results: The percentage of heavy drinkers among all admitted patients with liver diseases or liver cirrhosis was approximately 15%. Of the patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis, the cirrhosis was derived from alcohol alone in 61% and from alcohol plus a virus in 39% of patients. Furthermore, the percentage of patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis caused by alcohol alone and who did not have HCC was 80%. However, the percentage of HCC patients who tested negative for viral hepatitis serum markers was 27% of the total number of heavy drinkers admitted for HCC. A study mainly on liver cirrhosis performed in the early 1990s demonstrated that the alcohol‐alone group accounted for 44% of admitted patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis and 18% of heavy drinkers admitted for HCC. Conclusions: Because the consumption of alcohol is increasing in Japan, the frequency and number of cases of alcoholic liver cirrhosis are increasing. Viral hepatitis infection, however, still plays an important role in hepatocarcinogenesis in heavy drinkers. Radiographical examination is recommended even in patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis who test negative for serum markers of viral hepatitis.     

Alcohol use and cardiovascular disease preventive services

BACKGROUND: Moderate drinking is associated with decreased cardiovascular mortality. Biological effects may mediate this association, but differences in utilization of preventive services may be important. DESIGN AND METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of adults participating in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey with data on alcohol use and prior use of services for the detection and treatment of hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia. Regression models were analysed to provide age-, sex- and race-adjusted risk estimates for outcomes related to these services for several patterns of alcohol use relative to regular light drinkers. RESULTS: Hypertension was more common in most alcohol use strata compared with regular light drinkers (adjusted prevalence ratios 1.22 for lifelong abstainers, 1.33 for nonlifelong abstainers, 1.35 for infrequent moderate drinkers, 2.01 for frequent moderate drinkers, 1.73 for infrequent heavy drinkers and 1.98 for regular heavy drinkers, P-values < 0.05). Having had blood pressure measured was similar in all drinking strata. The prevalence of hypercholesterolaemia was similar in drinking strata, but most drinking patterns were associated with lower use of services to detect high cholesterol (prevalence ratios 0.7 for lifelong abstainers, 0.8 for nonlifelong abstainers, infrequent moderate and regular moderate drinkers, 0.6 for infrequent heavy drinkers, and 0.7 for regular heavy drinkers, P-values < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of cardiovascular disease preventive services may contribute to the beneficial association of moderate drinking with cardiovascular mortality. Additional research is needed to estimate the influence of differences in health services utilization on the association of alcohol use with cardiovascular disease outcomes.     

Naltrexone and Brief Counseling to Reduce Heavy Drinking

Naltrexone (NTX) has been shown to be safe and effective in reducing relapses among alcoholics. Among nondependent heavy drinkers, who are more numerous in the general population than are alcohol-dependent drinkers, brief counseling has been shown to reduce alcohol consumption. The authors conducted a 6-week randomized study of the effects of adding 25-mg or 50-mg daily doses of NTX to brief counseling in 14 nondependent heavy drinkers. NTX was well-tolerated. Desire for alcohol, drinking frequency, frequency of heavy drinking, total alcohol consumption, and serum gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase all decreased significantly during treatment. A placebo-controlled trial is warranted to evaluate further the efficacy of NTX in this group of problem drinkers.     

National Survey of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Heavy Drinkers in Japan

Background: The major cause of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the general Japanese population is an infection related to hepatotropic viruses, especially hepatitis virus C (HCV). Even in heavy drinkers, the major cause of HCC is HCV infection. However, HCC without viral infection has been reported in heavy drinkers. Alcohol has been also reported to be associated with an increased risk of cancer. In this study, we investigated aspects of HCC pathogenesis in heavy drinkers in Japan.
Methods: Questionnaires were sent to 1350 hospitals authorized by the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology. The questionnaires asked about the number of inpatients with the different types of alcoholic liver diseases, admitted to each hospital between 1998 and 2001.
Results: The percentage of heavy drinkers among all admitted patients with liver diseases or liver cirrhosis was approximately 15%. Of the patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis, the cirrhosis was derived from alcohol alone in 61% and from alcohol plus a virus in 39% of patients. Furthermore, the percentage of patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis caused by alcohol alone and who did not have HCC was 80%. However, the percentage of HCC patients who tested negative for viral hepatitis serum markers was 27% of the total number of heavy drinkers admitted for HCC. A study mainly on liver cirrhosis performed in the early 1990s demonstrated that the alcohol-alone group accounted for 44% of admitted patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis and 18% of heavy drinkers admitted for HCC.
Conclusions: Because the consumption of alcohol is increasing in Japan, the frequency and number of cases of alcoholic liver cirrhosis are increasing. Viral hepatitis infection, however, still plays an important role in hepatocarcinogenesis in heavy drinkers. Radiographical examination is recommended even in patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis who test negative for serum markers of viral hepatitis.     

Initial,habitual and compulsive alcohol use is characterized by a shift of cue processing from ventral to dorsal striatum

Aims During the development of drug addiction, initial hedonic effects decrease when substance use becomes habitual and ultimately compulsive. Animal research suggests that these changes are represented by a transition from prefrontal cortical control to subcortical striatal control and within the striatum from ventral to dorsal domains of the striatum, but only limited evidence exists in humans. In this study we address this hypothesis in the context of alcohol dependence. Design, setting and participants Non‐abstinent heavy social drinkers (n = 21, 5.0 ± 1.5 drinks/day, 13 of them were alcohol‐dependent according to DSM‐IV) and light social drinkers (n = 10, 0.4 ± 0.4 drinks/day) were examined. Measurements We used a cue‐reactivity functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) design during which pictures of alcoholic beverages and neutral control stimuli were presented. Findings In the dorsal striatum heavy drinkers showed significant higher activations compared to light drinkers, whereas light social drinkers showed higher cue‐induced fMRI activations in the ventral striatum and in prefrontal areas compared to heavy social drinkers [region of interest analyses, P < 0.05 false discovery rate (FDR)‐corrected]. Correspondingly, ventral striatal activation in heavy drinkers correlated negatively with obsessive‐compulsive craving, and furthermore we found a positive association between cue‐induced activation in the dorsal striatum and obsessive‐compulsive craving in all participants. Conclusions In line with our hypothesis we found higher cue‐induced activation of the ventral striatum in social compared to heavy drinkers, and higher dorsal striatal activation in heavy drinkers. Increased prefrontal activation may indicate that social drinkers activate cortical control when viewing alcohol cues, which may prevent the development of heavy drinking or alcohol dependence. Our results suggest differentiating treatment research depending on whether alcohol use is hedonic or compulsive.     

Hospital-admitted injury attributable to alcohol

Background: Primary data collection has established that alcohol causes injuries treated in the emergency department. No comparable data exist for injuries admitted to hospital. Data on the injury risks of heavy drinkers relative to other drinkers also are sparse. Methods: We estimated (i) whether regular heavy drinkers have higher hospitalized injury risks than other people when alcohol‐negative and (ii) how much hospitalized injury risk of regular heavy drinkers and other drinkers rises when alcohol‐positive. We combined national alcohol consumption data with alcohol metabolism rates to estimate hours spent alcohol‐positive versus alcohol‐negative during a year for heavy drinkers versus other people. A literature review provided hospitalized nonfatal injury rates for these groups by alcohol involvement. Results: Relative to other alcohol‐negative people aged 18 and older, heavy drinkers have an estimated relative risk of hospitalized injury of 1.4 when alcohol‐negative and 4.3 when alcohol‐positive. Others have an estimated relative risk of 1.0 when alcohol‐negative and 6.8 when alcohol‐positive. Thus, alcohol greatly raises injury risk. The excess risk patterns persist for a wide range of sensitivity analysis values. Of hospitalized injuries, an estimated 21% are alcohol‐attributable including 36% of assaults. Conclusions: Drinking alcohol is a major cause of hospitalized injury. Heavy drinkers lead risky lifestyles. They tolerate alcohol better than most drinkers, but their injury risks still triple when they drink. Our approach to attribution is a valuable complement to more costly, more precise approaches that rely heavily on primary data collection. It works for any severity of injury. Applying it only requires an existing alcohol consumption survey plus data on alcohol involvement in targeted injuries.     

Increased Blood Acetate: A New Laboratory Marker of Alcoholism and Heavy Drinking

Blood acetate concentration of 51 intoxicated patients was measured and compared to conventional laboratory markers of chronic alcoholism. Mean blood acetate concentration of 23 chronic alcoholics and 17 heavy drinkers was significantly (p less than 0.0005) higher than that of 53 nonalcoholic volunteers or 11 occasional drinkers. Blood acetate level was completely independent of blood ethanol concentration ranging from 0.20 to 2.90 promille. Blood acetate was elevated in 65% of both chronic alcoholics and heavy drinkers. Gammaglutamyltransferase was abnormal only in 35%, aspartate aminotransferase in 21% and mean corpuscular volume in 12% of heavy drinkers. Combination (acetate + gammaglutamyltransferase) correctly detected 87% of alcoholics and 71% of heavy drinkers. During ethanol oxidation the upper normal limit of blood acetate is 0.75 mM. The specificity of increased blood acetate is as high as 92%. Increased blood acetate is indicative for metabolic tolerance to alcohol and it may be so far the most sensitive and specific laboratory marker of chronic alcoholism and heavy drinking.     

Effects of chronic alcohol consumption on the broad phospholipid signal in human brain: an in vivo 31P MRS study

BACKGROUND: Phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy (31P MRS) allows for the measurement of phospholipids and their breakdown products in the human brain. Fairly mobile membrane phospholipids give rise to a broad signal that co-resonates with metabolic phosphodiesters. Chronic alcohol exposure increases the rigidity of isolated brain membranes and, thus, may affect the amount and transverse relaxation times (T2) of MRS-detectable phospholipids. We tested the hypothesis that subjects who were heavy drinkers have stiffer membranes than controls who were light drinkers, as reflected in a smaller broad signal component and a shorter T2 of the broad signal in 31P MR spectra of the brain. METHODS: Thirteen alcohol-dependent heavy drinkers (mean age 44 years) were studied by localized 31P MRS in the centrum semiovale and compared with 17 nondependent light drinkers of similar age. The broad component signal was separated from the metabolite signal by convolution difference, which is based on the large difference in line widths of these two signals. Longitudinal and T2 relaxation times were measured using standard methods. RESULTS: The broad component integral was 13% lower in the brain of heavy drinkers compared with light drinkers (p < 0.001) and remained significantly smaller after corrections for both longitudinal and transverse relaxations (p < 0.01). The T2 distribution of the broad component consistently showed two resolvable components in both groups. The fast relaxing component had the same T2 in both groups (T2 = 1.9 msec). The slower relaxing component T2 was 0.6 msec shorter in heavy drinkers compared with light drinkers (p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: These results, observed in the absence of white matter volume loss, are consistent with biochemical alterations and higher rigidity of white matter phospholipids associated with long-term chronic alcohol abuse. The observed smaller broad signal component in these relatively young heavy drinkers is a sensitive measure of white matter phospholipid damage.     

Delay discounting and the alcohol Stroop in heavy drinking adolescents

AIMS: To investigate whether adolescent heavy drinkers exhibit biased cognitive processing of alcohol-related cues and impulsive decision making. DESIGN: A between-subjects design was employed. SETTING: Classrooms in a single sixth-form college in Merseyside, UK. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety adolescent students (mean age 16.83 years), of whom 38% were identified as heavy drinkers and 36% were identified as light drinkers, based on a tertile split of their weekly alcohol consumption. MEASUREMENTS: Participants provided information about alcohol consumption before completing measures of alcohol craving, delay discounting and an "alcohol Stroop" in which they were required to name the colour in which alcohol-related and matched control words were printed. FINDINGS: Compared to light drinkers, heavy drinkers showed more pronounced discounting of delayed hypothetical monetary and alcohol rewards, which is indicative of a more short-term focus in decision making in heavy drinkers. Heavy drinkers were also slower to colour-name alcohol-related words, which indicates an attentional bias for alcohol-related cues. In all participants, measures of delay discounting and attentional bias were correlated moderately with each other, and also with the level of alcohol consumption and with alcohol craving. CONCLUSIONS: In adolescents, heavy alcohol use is associated with biased attentional processing of alcohol-related cues and a shorter-term focus in decision making.     

Heavy Drinking among Norwegian Male Drunken Drivers: A Study of γ-Glutamyltransferase

The distributions of blood alcohol concentrations (BACs) of different age groups of drunken drivers suggested that a large number of the drunken drivers above 29 years of age had high tolerance to alcohol, and many of these might be heavy drinkers. In order to study the extent of heavy drinking, gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) activities were measured in 269 blood samples from male drunken drivers using a new method suitable for hemolyzed blood samples. Of the drunken drivers above 29 years of age, 40% had elevated GGT activities, indicating that roughly one-third of these drivers might be heavy drinkers (consuming more than 80 g of alcohol/day). Of the drunken drivers above 29 years of age with BACs above 55 mmol/liter (250 mg/100 ml), 63% had elevated GGT, indicating that a large majority of these drivers were heavy drinkers. Fewer of the younger drivers had elevated GGT activities. The GGT activities of the repeating offenders indicated that the percentage of heavy drinkers in this group was approximately the same as in the total population of apprehended drunken drivers.     

Patterns of alcohol consumption and alcohol-impaired driving in the United States

Background:  Alcohol-related motor vehicle crashes kill approximately 17,000 Americans annually and were associated with more than $51 billion in total costs in 2000. Relatively little is known about the drinking patterns of alcohol-impaired (AI) drivers in the United States.
Methods:  2006 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) was analyzed for alcohol consumption and self-reported AI driving among U.S. adults aged ≥18 years for all states. Alcohol consumption was divided into 4 categories: binge/heavy, binge/nonheavy, nonbinge/heavy, and nonbinge/nonheavy. Binge drinking was defined as ≥5 drinks for men or ≥4 drinks for women on one or more occasions in the past month, and heavy drinking was defined as average daily consumption of >2 drinks/day (men) or >1 drink/day (women). The prevalence of AI driving was examined by drinking pattern and by demographic characteristics. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association between drinking patterns and AI driving.
Results:  Five percent of drinkers were engaged in AI driving during the past 30 days. Overall, 84% of AI drivers were binge drinkers and 88% of AI driving episodes involved binge drinkers. By drinking category, binge/nonheavy drinkers accounted for the largest percentage of AI drivers (49.4%), while binge/heavy drinkers accounted for the most episodes of AI driving (51.3%). The adjusted odds of AI driving were 20.1 (95% CI: 16.7, 24.3) for binge/heavy, 8.2 (6.9, 9.7) for binge/nonheavy, and 3.9 (2.4, 6.3) for nonbinge/heavy drinkers, respectively.
Conclusions:  There is a strong association between binge drinking and AI driving. Most AI drivers and almost half of all AI driving episodes involve persons who are not heavy drinkers (based on average daily consumption). Implementing effective interventions to prevent binge drinking could substantially reduce AI driving.     

Effects of alcohol consumption on cardiovascular events in male patients with healed myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: In Western countries, many studies have shown that among healthy people moderate drinkers have a lower incidence of cardiovascular events than abstainers and heavy drinkers. However, it is not clear whether this is true in patients with a healed myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS AND RESULTS: In the present study cardiovascular events were defined as cardiac events or strokes. Male patients only were included because the incidence of cardiovascular events is low in females. In patients younger than 65 years, the incidence of cardiovascular events was 34.6 persons per year (54 cases: 3.9%) of abstainers, 17.4 persons per year (20 cases: 1.9%) of moderate drinkers (p<0.01 vs abstainers) and 30.3 s persons per year (18 cases: 3.2%) of heavy drinkers. However, in those aged 65 years or older, the incidence was 47.8 persons per year (24 cases: 4.5%) of abstainers, 58.4 persons per year (14 cases: 5.6%) of moderate drinkers, and 314.8 persons per year (12 cases: 19.7%) of heavy drinkers. In this age group, cardiovascular events were significantly higher in heavy drinkers than in the other 2 groups (p<0.01), and the incidence was not lower in the moderate drinkers than in abstainers as shown in the younger group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients younger than 65 years with a healed MI, drinking limited less than 30 ml/day (moderate intake) reduces the incidence of cardiovascular events, but not in those aged 65 years or older.     

Alcohol consumption, alcohol dependence, and all-cause mortality

BACKGROUND: This study examined the effects of alcohol consumption and DSM-IV alcohol dependence on the risk of mortality. METHODS: Data from the 1988 National Health Interview Survey Alcohol Supplement were matched to the National Death Index for the years 1988 to 1995 (baseline n = 37,682 U.S. adults age > or =25 linked to 3,586 deaths). All mortality analyses were based on proportional hazards models that adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, marital status, education, income, labor force status, body mass index, smoking status, and poor health indicators at baseline. RESULTS: When dependence was not considered and all past-year abstainers were used as the reference group, both light and moderate drinkers exhibited a reduced risk of mortality, with hazards ratios of 0.76 (0.68-0.84) and 0.84 (0.74-0.96). Heavy drinkers had about the same risk of dying as did past-year abstainers, and very heavy drinkers had an increased risk that was not significant (OR = 1.17, CI = 0.93-1.47). When lifetime abstainers were used as the reference category, the protective effect of moderate drinking fell short of significance, and there were nearly significant increased risks among former drinkers and very heavy drinkers. When dependence was considered, light and moderate drinkers without dependence had a reduced mortality risk regardless of reference group, and there was no significant effect among heavy or very heavy drinkers without dependence. Among dependent drinkers, there was no protective effect of light or moderate drinking, and very heavy drinkers had a significantly increased risk (OR = 1.56 relative to past-year abstainers and 1.65 relative to lifetime abstainers). CONCLUSIONS: Because alcohol dependence nullifies the protective effect of light and moderate drinking, it is important to understand its role as an independent risk factor for mortality. Differences between dependent and nondependent drinkers who drank comparable amounts suggest that this risk may result from longer and heavier drinking histories before baseline, more severe health problems at baseline, more heavy episodic drinking, and, possibly, differences in beverage preference.     

Alcohol use and functional disability among cognitively impaired adults.

BACKGROUND: The extent to which alcohol exposure increases risk for functional disability among older adults with cognitive impairment has not previously been assessed. OBJECTIVE: To examine the potential relationship between alcohol use and functional disability among older cognitively impaired adults. DESIGN: Retrospective medical record review. SETTING: Hospital-based geriatric assessment center. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred forty-two consecutive participants with Mini-Mental Status Examination scores of < or = 24. MEASUREMENTS: Proxy-reported alcohol intake was classified in categories of never, former, light (< 1 drink/week), moderate (> or = 1 but < 14 drinks/week), and heavy (> or = 14 drinks/week) drinkers, and functional status was determined by proxy-reported performance in seven basic (BADL) and seven instrumental (IADL) activities of daily living (0 = poorest function and 14 = best function). RESULTS: Compared with never drinkers, moderate drinkers demonstrated higher mean BADL (12.2 vs 11.4, P = .033) and IADL scores (6.6 vs 5.6, P = .067), whereas heavy drinkers had higher BADL (12.8 vs 11.4, P = .019) but lower IADL scores (4.8 vs 5.6, P = .425). Former drinkers demonstrated both lower BADL (10.8 vs 11.4, P = .107) and IADL scores (3.9 vs 5.6, P = .011) compared with never drinkers. Evaluation of a potential dose-response effect was limited due to low numbers of light and heavy drinkers. CONCLUSIONS: Among cognitively impaired adults, moderate and heavy drinkers demonstrated better BADL function, whereas former drinkers had poorer IADL function, compared with never drinkers. Prospective studies that incorporate additional measures of exposure (e.g., cumulative lifetime consumption) and function (e.g., performance-based tests) may provide a more comprehensive understanding of alcohol's effects among older cognitively impaired adults.