Usefulness of the addition of metformin to insulin in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of metformin in addition to insulin therapy in adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Nine patients, two males and seven females, aged 18.1 +/- 3.0 years, with type 1 diabetes mellitus were studied. They were relatively overweight with a body mass index (BMI) of 24.2 +/- 1.8 and had high levels of HbA1c at 9.5 +/- 1.2% despite high doses of insulin of 74.0 +/- 31.2 U/day. Metformin at the dose of 500-750 mg daily was administered to the patients in addition to insulin therapy for 1 year. RESULTS: HbA1c, BMI and insulin dose were compared before 1 year without metformin therapy, at baseline, and at 3, 6 and 12 months during the use of metformin in addition to insulin therapy. HbA1c lowered (8.6 +/- 1.4**, 8.4 +/- 1.3**, 8.4 +/- 1.2*%), BMI was reduced (23.9 +/- 1.7*, 23.8 +/- 1.8, 23.5 +/- 1.8*), and insulin requirement decreased (69.8 +/- 29.7*, 68.7 +/- 29.8**, 67.3 +/- 29.1**U/d) significantly after the start of metformin therapy (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs at baseline). There were no adverse events, not even lactic acidosis, during the study period. CONCLUSION: Metformin is safe and may represent a useful adjunct to the management of type 1 diabetes mellitus in adolescents and young adults who have poor glycemic control despite a large amount of insulin.     

A randomized, controlled study of insulin pump therapy in diabetic preschoolers

OBJECTIVE: To compare glycemic control, safety, and parental satisfaction in preschool-aged diabetic children randomized to treatment either with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) or intensive insulin injection therapy. STUDY DESIGN: This clinical trial enrolled 42 patients <5 years of age who had been diagnosed with diabetes for at least 12 months. Children were randomly assigned to CSII (n = 21) or intensive insulin injection therapy (n = 21). Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level was measured at baseline, 3, and 6 months. Secondary outcomes included severe hypoglycemic events, meter-detected hypoglycemia, blood sugar variability, body mass index (BMI), and satisfaction with therapy. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients completed 6 months of therapy. There was a significant decrease in HbA1c during the study period for both groups (from 8.9% +/- 0.6% to 8.6% +/- 0.6% at 3- and 6-month visits). At 3 months, children using pumps had a significantly lower HbA1c than the injection group (8.4% vs 8.8%); however, by 6 months the two groups were similar (8.5% vs 8.7%). No differences in pre-meal blood sugar variabilities were seen between groups. Children on pumps had increases in the number of meter-detected episodes of hypoglycemia. Pump therapy was safe and well tolerated. No episodes of ketoacidosis occurred in either group, whereas one hypoglycemic seizure occurred in each group. Parents reported satisfaction with CSII, with 95% of families continuing on CSII beyond the 6-month study period. CONCLUSION: Pump therapy in preschool-aged children was not associated with clinically significant differences in glycemic control as compared with intensive injection therapy. The rationale for initiating CSII in this age group should be based on patient selection and lifestyle preference.     

Use of insulin glargine in children under age 6 with type 1 diabetes

AIM: Children under 6 yr have the highest incidence of severe hypoglycemia (SH) and the greatest likelihood of brain damage from SH. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of insulin glargine (Lantus in children under age 6 with type 1 diabetes (T1D). METHODS: The electronic medical records were reviewed for patients under age 6 during the first 6 months of insulin glargine therapy and compared with age, sex, and duration of diabetes for matched control patients on neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin. Data from 128 subjects (32 male pairs and 32 female pairs) were collected relating to the incidence of severe and non-severe hypoglycemic events, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) values, body mass index (BMI), and daily insulin dose. Additionally, parents were asked to complete a diabetes Quality of Life (QoL) survey. RESULTS: In the 6 months before the study period, the glargine group had 16 SH events compared with three in the 6 months post-glargine. The comparison (NPH) group had seven and six SH events in their respective 6-month periods. Nighttime SH events in the glargine group decreased from 12 prestudy events to one during the study period. The average daily insulin dose in the glargine group was higher than that in the NPH group (0.8+/- 0.2 vs. 0.7+/- 0.2 U/kg/day; p=0.03). The HbA1c values, BMI, and QoL responses were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: SH was decreased, particularly at night (from 12 episodes to one), after the introduction of glargine in young children with T1D.     

Mixing rapid-acting insulin analogues with insulin glargine in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether mixing insulin glargine (IG) with a rapid-acting insulin (RAI) analogue in the same syringe had any deleterious effects on glycemic control in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus. STUDY DESIGN: Data from 55 children mixing the IG with a RAI analogue was collected for 6 months before and 6 months after the insulin mixing began. Data from a control group of 55 children not mixing the insulins was collected at similar intervals. Parameters evaluated included hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) values, number of non-severe and severe hypoglycemic events, number of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) events, and blood glucose distribution patterns. RESULTS: After 6 months of study, HbA1c values were equivalent for the control and test groups (8.54+/-1.14 vs 8.61+/-1.14, respectively; P=1.0000). Percentages of blood glucose values in, above, and below the target range did not vary significantly in the groups. There were no significant differences in the groups in the occurrence of non-severe or severe hypoglycemic events or of DKA events. CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences in glycemic control between children who mixed IG in the same syringe with a RAI analogue compared with children who took separate injections.     

Sustained metabolic control and low rates of severe hypoglycaemic episodes in preschool diabetic children treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion

AIM: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) in children under 7 years of age. METHODS: One hundred and ten children, aged 0.9-7 years, who had received CSII therapy for at least 6 months, were studied for 237 patient-years by a retrospective chart review. Charts were reviewed for glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), severe hypoglycaemia (SH), ketoacidosis (DKA), height, weight and insulin requirement. In 69 cases (children aged 1.6-7 years) CSII was administered after at least 3 months of insulin therapy with pens. In this group, data from the year from before CSII administration were compared with values recorded during 1 year of CSII treatment. RESULTS: Mean HbA1c decreased from 7.8 +/- 0.9 before CSII to 7.5 +/- 1.0 after 6 and 12 months of pump therapy (p = 0.04). In the whole group, the mean HbA1c after 6 months of CSII was 7.5 +/- 1.0 and remained unchanged for up to 4 years of follow-up. Some episodes of SH--4.2 per 100 patient-years, and DKA--5.7 per 100 patient-years were recorded. No increase in BMI z-score occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In the youngest children, CSII therapy lowers HbA1c values and provides sustained metabolic control without increases in hypoglycaemia or ketoacidosis episodes.     

Use of a subcutaneous injection port to improve glycemic control in children with type 1 diabetes

Objective:  To determine if use of an injection port, the Insuflon™, would help to improve glycemic control in youth with type 1 diabetes (TID) who were in suboptimal glycemic control (hemoglobin A1c, HbA1c >8.0%).
Study design:  A three-arm randomized protocol was used to study the effects of the Insuflon (a subcutaneous injection port) vs. an alarmable blood glucose meter vs. a control group on glycemic control in 66 youth with T1D. All participants used insulin glargine™ as their basal insulin and the NovoPen^® Junior with insulin aspart™ as their rapid-acting insulin. Participants were randomized into control, alarm, or Insuflon groups. HbA1c levels were the primary outcome with values at baseline, 3, and 6 months.
Results:  Initial parameters were similar in the three groups. HbA1c values were significantly lower for youth who used the Insuflon than for the control group at 3 and 6 months (p = 0.025). The HbA1c values (in %) for youth using the Insuflon decreased significantly from 9.4 at screening to 8.7 at 3 months (p < 0.001) and 8.5 at 6 months (p < 0.001). There were no significant reductions (p ≥ 0.05) in the HbA1c values within the other two groups.
Conclusion:  The Insuflon injection port helps some youth with T1D to improve glycemic control.     

Initiation of insulin glargine in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes

BACKGROUND: Glargine (Lantus) is a recently approved, long-acting insulin analog that is increasingly being used in children with diabetes. The aim of this retrospective chart review was to summarize our experience in starting glargine in children and adolescents with diabetes. SUBJECTS AND STUDY METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 71 children with type 1 diabetes (29 boys and 42 girls) who initiated glargine therapy to improve glycemic control between 1 June 2001 and 30 June 2002. Data were collected for 6 months before and 6 months after adding glargine. RESULTS: Subjects' mean age [+/-standard deviation (SD)] at diagnosis of diabetes was 7.5 +/- 4.1 yr. Mean age at initiation of glargine therapy was 11.5 +/- 4.9 yr. The total daily long-acting insulin dose decreased by about 20% after initiating glargine therapy. There were no significant differences in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and blood glucose control prior to and after initiating glargine therapy (HbA1c at baseline 8.9 +/- 1.6% and HbA1c after 6 months of glargine therapy was 8.9 +/- 1.5%). Overall, blood glucose concentrations did not differ significantly throughout the study. Patients who switched to glargine because of nocturnal hypoglycemia had a 65% decrease in nocturnal blood glucose reading less than 50 mg/dL. There were three seizures in the first week after initiating glargine therapy. CONCLUSION: This retrospective study suggests that glargine is at least as effective as other long-acting insulins but that care must be taken during the conversion process to avoid hypoglycemia.     

Frequency of SMBG correlates with HbA1c and acute complications in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes

Ziegler R, Heidtmann B, Hilgard D, Hofer S, Rosenbauer J, Holl R; for the DPV‐Wiss‐Initiative. Frequency of SMBG correlates with HbA1c and acute complications in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. The aim of this study was to correlate the frequency of self‐monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) to the quality of metabolic control as measured by hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), the frequency of hypoglycemia and ketoacidosis, and to see whether the associations between SMBG and these outcomes are influenced by the patient's age or treatment regime. We analyzed data from the DPV‐Wiss‐database of 26 723 children and adolescents aged 0–18 yr with type 1 diabetes recorded during 1995–2006. Variables evaluated were gender, age at visit, diabetes duration, therapy regime, insulin dose, body mass index–standard deviation scores (BMI–SDS), HbA1c, rate of hypoglycemia, and ketoacidosis. In the youngest age group of children under the age of 6 yr, the frequency of SMBG was the highest compared with that in children aged 6–12 yr or children aged > 12 yr: 6.0/d vs. 5.3/d vs. 4.4/d (p < 0.001). Frequency of SMBG differed significantly also in the different groups of treatment (p < 0.001), but only for the continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) group the frequency was considerably higher: 5.3/d (CSII) vs. 4.7/d (multiple daily injections) vs. 4.6/d (conventional therapy). Adjusted for age, gender, diabetes duration, year of treatment, insulin regimen, insulin dose, BMI‐SDS, and center difference, SMBG frequency was significantly associated with better metabolic control with a drop of HbA1c of 0.20% for one additional SMBG per day (p < 0.001). Increasing the SMBG frequency above 5/d did not result in further improvement of metabolic control. A higher frequency of SMBG measurements was related to better metabolic control. But only among adolescents aged > 12 yr, metabolic control (HbA1c) improved distinctively with two or more blood glucose measurements.     

Optimal control of type 1 diabetes mellitus in youth receiving intensive treatment

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of factors that might interfere with optimal glycemic control in youth with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) in the current era of intensive management, including the interplay of race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status (SES) on HbA1c levels. STUDY DESIGN: This study comprised a database review of all patients under age 18 years with T1DM for at least 6 months duration. Sex, age, race/ethnicity, duration of diabetes, mode of insulin administration (pump vs injection), body mass index, SES, and HbA1c level were recorded at each patient's most recent visit between January and September 2003. RESULTS: Mean HbA1c level for the 455 patients was 7.6% +/- 1.4%; only 31% of patients failed to meet the therapeutic goal of < 8.0%. Multiple linear regression analysis identified female sex (P = .02), older age (P = .001), longer duration of diabetes (P < .001), injection therapy (P < .001), and lower SES (P = .001) as significantly associated with higher HbA1c level. After adjustment for SES, race/ethnicity was not a determinant of HbA1c level. CONCLUSIONS: Low SES had a greater association with poor metabolic control than did race/ethnicity, which was not associated with differences in HbA1c level after controlling for SES. Most children were able to attain glycemic targets at least as good as the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial recommendations in a large clinical practice.     

Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion benefits quality of life in preschool-age children with type 1 diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVE: To compare medical, nutritional, and psychosocial outcomes of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy and multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) in preschoolers with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) in a randomized controlled trial. STUDY DESIGN: Sixteen children (mean age 4.4 +/- 0.7 yr, range 3.1-5.3 yr) with T1DM were randomly assigned to CSII or MDI. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was measured monthly for 6 months. Glucose variability was measured at baseline and at 6 months using continuous blood glucose sensing. Quality of life, adverse events, and nutrition information were assessed. RESULTS: Parents of the CSII group reported a significant decrease in diabetes-related worry, while parents of the MDI group reported an increased frequency of stress associated with their child's medical care. Mean HbA1c levels from baseline (CSII 8.3 +/- 1.4%, MDI 8.0 +/- 0.8%) to 6 months (CSII 8.4 +/- 0.8%, MDI 8.2 +/- 0.4%) remained stable, and group differences were not significant. There were no significant group differences in duration of hypo- or hyperglycemic events or frequency of adverse events. CONCLUSION(S): For young children with T1DM, CSII therapy is comparable to MDI therapy with regard to glucose control but is associated with higher treatment satisfaction and improved quality of life.     

The addition of rosiglitazone to insulin in adolescents with type 1 diabetes and poor glycaemic control: a randomized-controlled trial

Objective:  To evaluate the effect of rosiglitazone, an insulin sensitizer, on glycaemic control and insulin resistance in adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM)
Research design and methods:  Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial of rosiglitazone (4 mg twice daily) vs. placebo (24 wk each, with a 4 wk washout period). Entry criteria were diabetes duration >1 yr, age 10–18 yr, puberty (≥Tanner breast stage 2 or testicular volume >4 mL), insulin dose ≥1.1 units/kg/day, and haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) >8%. Responses to rosiglitazone were compared with placebo using paired t -tests.
Results:  Of 36 adolescents recruited (17 males), 28 completed the trial. At baseline, age was 13.6 ± 1.8 yr, HbA1c 8.9 ± 0.96%, body mass index standard deviation scores (BMI-SDS) 0.94 ± 0.74 and insulin dose 1.5 ± 0.3 units/kg/day. Compared with placebo, rosiglitazone resulted in decreased insulin dose (5.8% decrease vs. 9.4% increase, p = 0.02), increased serum adiponectin (84.8% increase vs. 26.0% decrease, p < 0.01), increased cholesterol (+0.5 mmol/L vs. no change, p = 0.02), but no significant change in HbA1c (−0.3 vs. −0.1, p = 0.57) or BMI-SDS (0.08 vs. 0.04, p = 0.31). Insulin sensitivity was highly variable in the seven subjects who consented to euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic clamps. There were no major adverse effects attributable to rosiglitazone.
Conclusion:  The addition of rosiglitazone to insulin did not improve HbA1c in this group of normal weight adolescents with T1DM.     

The impact of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion on health-related quality of life in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes

AIM: To study the impact of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy on health-related quality of life in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: 31 children and adolescents with poorly regulated type 1 diabetes (mean HbA1c 10.4%, SD 1.8), mean age 14.4 (1.5) y (range 9.7-17.1) and mean diabetes duration of 6.8 (3.2) y (range 1.3-14.6) were consecutively assigned to CSII therapy. Data for generic (CHQ-CF87) and diabetes-specific quality of life (DQOL) were obtained before initiating pump therapy and twice during 15 mo of treatment. HbA1c, BMI and episodes of severe hypoglycaemia and ketoacidosis were recorded over 15 mo prior to and 15 mo during pump therapy. RESULTS: Analysis showed improvements on the family activity scale (p=0.041) and change in health score (p=0.042) (CHQ-CF87). Mean HbA1c decreased from 10.4% (1.8) to 9.0% (0.9) after 3 mo, increasing to 9.6% (1.2) after 15 mo. The number of overweight and obese children increased from 4 and 2 before CSII, to 6 and 3 after 15 mo (IOTF criteria). There was a reduction in severe hypoglycaemia episodes from 43.8 to 5.2 per 100 patient years, but no change in ketoacidosis episodes. CONCLUSION: The degree of limitation experienced by families due to adolescents' general health and well-being was significantly reduced. Expected improvement in metabolic control and frequency of severe hypoglycaemia was observed.     

Hemoglobin A1c in obese children and adolescents who participated in a weight management program

AIM: The objective of this study was to compare hemoglobin A1c values in non-diabetic obese children and adolescents before enrollment and after completion of a 12-wk weight management program. METHODS: Seventeen children and adolescents, age 10.8+/-2.5 y (mean+/-1 SD), joined a multidisciplinary weight management program. Hemoglobin A1c and body mass index were measured at the start and at the completion of the program in each participant. RESULTS: Body mass index at the start of the program was 34.3+/-6.4 kg/m2. Body mass index at the end of the program was 33+/-6.6 kg/m2 (p<0.05). Hemoglobin A1c at the beginning of the program was 5.3+/-0.3%. Hemoglobin A1c at the completion of the program was 5+/-0.2% (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: In this group of overweight children, hemoglobin A1c decreased significantly after participating in a multi-disciplinary weight loss program. These findings further point to the beneficial effect of lifestyle changes on the metabolic status of obese children.     

Weight in adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus during continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy

Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) has become increasingly popular as a form of intensified insulin therapy in adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM). One reported drawback was increased weight gain in adolescents after initiation of insulin pump therapy. In a prospective, longitudinal, non-randomized and case controlled study, we followed 12 adolescents (mean age 13.6 yr, 8 males, 4 females) from 6 months before the start of CSII to 12 months on CSII. These 12 adolescents with DM on CSII were matched for age, gender, HbA1c, duration of DM, and body mass index (BMI) with 12 adolescents who continued on multiple injection therapy (MIT). In addition, six of the 12 adolescents on CSII intended to control their weight by means of the insulin pump. These six vs six adolescents within the CSII group were further analyzed for weight development and eating habits. Clinical indications for CSII were dawn phenomenon, night-time hypoglycemia and patient request for more flexibility in DM management. All patients had been in satisfactory metabolic control on MIT. After 12 months of CSII, the daily insulin requirement remained significantly lower than 18 months before (0.79 +/- 0.11 vs 1.02 +/- 27 U/kg/d, p = 0.034) and number of daily meals was lower (4.1 +/- 0.9 vs 6.5 +/- 0.7, p = 0.006). Mean initial HbA1c was 7.4% in the MIT and CSII patients, and remained comparable between these two groups. BMI was not different between the CSII and MIT group over the entire study period. However, those adolescents on CSII who intended to control their weight by means of the insulin pump were able to achieve relative weight loss during the,first 6 months on CSII. Two patients of the CSII group had one severe hypoglycemic episode with loss of consciousness. In conclusion, CSII does not lead to weight gain by itself, but allows sufficient weight control without a negative effect on metabolic control. The general threat of weight gain in patients who switch to insulin pump therapy must be pointed out, and the role of eating habits and caloric content of food should play a central role in insulin pump educational programs.     

Telemedical support to improve glycemic control in adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus

Introduction In this paper, we evaluated the feasibility of a telemedical (TM) support program and its effect on glycemic control in adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Thirty-six adolescents (m=20, median age at the start of the study: 15.3 years (range: 10.7–19.3 years), median age at diagnosis: 9.3 years (2.1–13.8 years), median duration of disease: 6.4 years (1.0–12.8 years), HbA1c>8%, all on intensified insulin therapy) were randomized in a crossover trial over 6 months (3 months with TM, 3 months with conventional support and paper diary (PD)). During the TM phase, the patients sent their data (date, time, blood glucose, carbohydrate intake, insulin dosage) via mobile phone, at least daily, to our server and diabetologists sent back their advice via short message service (SMS) once a week.Results Glycemic control improved during the TM phase, while it deteriorated during the PD phase: TM-PD group HbA1c (%, median (range)): 9.05 (8–11.3) (at 0 months), 8.9 (6.9–11.3) (at 3 months), and 9.2 (7.4–12.6) (at 6 months), and PD-TM group: 8.9 (8.3–11.6), 9.9 (8.1–11), and 8.85 (7.3–11.7) (p<0.05). Patients rated the TM support program to be a good idea. Technical problems with General Packet Radio Service (GPRS) data transmission led to data loss and decreased patient satisfaction.Conclusion Our telemedical support program, VIE-DIAB, proved to be feasible in adolescents and helped to improve glycemic control.     

Effects of iron deficiency anemia on hemoglobin A1c in type 1 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND: The relationship between hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and iron status in type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM) has not been adequately studied. In this prospective investigation, we aimed to determine the effect of iron deficiency on HbA1c in diabetic patients who also had insufficient iron stores. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with type 1 DM were included in the study. Eleven of them were also iron deficient (ID) and the remaining 26 were iron-sufficient (IS). Two non-diabetic control groups were selected for the ID and IS groups. All patients with ID were treated with iron at 6 mg/kg per day for 3 months. Glycemia in diabetic patients was monitored at home before breakfast and supper by a glycometer. Hemoglobin A1c was measured in all subjects at the beginning and the end of the study. RESULTS: Patients with ID DM had higher levels of HbA1c than those in the control group (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the weekly average glucose concentration of the patients with ID DM before and after iron supplementation. In contrast, HbA1c decreased from a mean of 10.1 +/- 2.7% to a mean of 8.2 +/- 3.1% (P < 0.05). Additionally, HbA1c in ID non-diabetic patients decreased from a mean of 7.6 +/- 2.6% to 6.2 +/- 1.4% after iron therapy (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that among type 1 DM patients with similar level of glycemia, iron deficiency anemia is associated with higher concentrations of HbA1c. In addition, iron replacement therapy leads to a drop in HbA1c in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients. The iron status of the patient must be considered during the interpretation of HbA1c concentrations in type 1 DM.     

Assessment of glycemic control by continuous glucose monitoring system in 50 children with type 1 diabetes starting on insulin pump therapy

OBJECTIVE: To report experience with a continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) and to identify factors influencing glycemic control in a large cohort of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes and change to insulin pump therapy via continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). RESEARCH DESIGN and METHODS: In 50 patients [21 boys, 29 girls; median age 12.6 yr (range: 1.3-16.4 yr); diabetes duration 5.0 yr (0.2-13.3)], hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and ambulatory CGMS were performed before and 6 wk after starting CSII. Average glucose concentration per 24 h, during day and night time as well as number of excursions, duration, and area under the curve (AUC) of glucose values above 180 mg/dL and below 60 mg/dL were calculated from CGMS data. Simultaneously, metabolic control was documented by standardized self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). RESULTS: In the total cohort, HbA1c improved from 8.1 +/- 1.2% at baseline to 7.7 +/- 0.9% after 6 wk of CSII (p <0.001). This effect was more distinct in boys (8.0 +/- 1.4 vs. 7.5 +/- 1.1%, p=0.007) than in girls (8.1 +/- 1.1 vs. 7.8 +/- 0.7%, p=0.039) as well as in patients with poor glycemic control (HbA1c >8.0%) at baseline (8.9 +/- 0.6 vs. 8.1 +/- 0.8%, p <0.001) and in those older than 12 yr (8.2 +/- 1.2 vs. 7.7 +/- 1.0%, p <0.001). At 6 wk of CSII, the values of glucose average per 24 h, AUC and time above 180 mg/dL, particularly during the day, improved. HbA1c was correlated with AUC above 180 mg/dL (r=0.742, p <0.001) and CGMS average glucose per 24 h (r=0.628, p=0.002), but to a lesser extent with SMBG values (r=0.418, p=0.054). CONCLUSION: With the change to CSII, HbA1c improved significantly after 6 wk of therapy. CGMS usage provided additional information about glycemic control in these patients.     

Biphasic insulin aspart vs. human insulin in adolescents with type 1 diabetes on multiple daily insulin injections

The aim was to compare clinical efficacy and safety of two treatment regimens: biphasic insulin aspart (BIAsp) injected at all three meals plus neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin at bedtime vs. a human insulin regimen, premixed human insulin at breakfast and soluble insulin at lunch and dinner and NPH at bedtime. A total of 167 adolescents (80 males and 87 females) with type 1 diabetes was included in the trial (multinational, randomized, open-label, and parallel group). Each subject received either of two treatment regimens for a 4-month period. BIAsp was injected immediately before main meals, human insulin products 30 min before meals, and NPH at night. Glycemic control was monitored by eight-point evaluations (after 6 and 16 wks) and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (after 2, 6, and 16 wks). Safety evaluations included adverse events and incidence of hypoglycemic episodes. HbA1c (mean+/- SD) after 4 months on BIAsp (9.39+/- 0.14) was not significantly different from that with human insulin (9.30+/- 0.15). The average postprandial glucose increment in the BIAsp group was about half the increment in the human insulin group; the difference not statistically significant. The body mass index (BMI) increased in both groups, but significantly (p=0.005) less in the BIAsp group. However, in males on BIAsp, the BMI decreased compared with those on human insulin (p=0.007). No significant group differences were found for the rate of hypoglycemic episodes. We concluded that the BIAsp regimen was associated with similar glycemic control and similar incidence of hypoglycemic episodes as human insulin. However, the BIAsp regimen caused a significantly smaller increase in BMI, particularly in males, compared with the human insulin regimen.     

The effectiveness of Internet-based blood glucose monitoring system on improving diabetes control in adolescents with type 1 diabetes

Landau Z, Mazor‐Aronovitch K, Boaz M, Blaychfeld‐Magnazi M, Graph‐Barel C, Levek‐Motola N, Pinhas‐Hamiel O. The effectiveness of Internet‐based blood glucose monitoring system on improving diabetes control in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Objective: To determine whether the use of an Internet‐based blood glucose monitoring system could improve glycemic control in adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Methods: In a randomized, controlled clinical trial, a total of 70 adolescent subjects with T1DM were recruited. Subjects randomized to the intervention group (n = 36) were instructed to submit their blood glucose levels weekly by Internet to the Diabetes Care Team during a period of 6 months. Subjects randomized to the control group (n = 34) did not submit results but were under routine follow‐up. Results: At baseline, patients were 15.1 ± 2.6 years of age with mean HbA1c of 8.3 ± 1.3%. At the 6‐month follow‐up period, no by‐group differences in change from baseline to end of treatment HbA1c levels were detected. In the intervention group, 12/36 did not submit blood glucose levels and were classified as non‐compliant. In a secondary exploratory analysis in which non‐compliant patients were omitted, HbA1c values in the compliant intervention group declined from 8.5 ± 1.7% at baseline to 8.2 ± 1.2% at 6 months, while in the control group HbA1c values increased from 8.2 ± 1.1 to 8.4 ± 1.1%, this difference did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: An Internet‐based blood glucose monitoring system was not associated with improved glycemic control in adolescents with T1DM. Identification of a sub‐group of compliant subjects who may improve metabolic control by using this tool is needed.     

Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in children and adolescents with diabetes mellitus: decreased HbA1c with low risk of hypoglycemia

AIM: To evaluate blood glucose and HbA1c levels, insulin dosage, hypoglycemia rate and body mass index (BMI) at baseline, and at 3 and 6 months after initiation of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) in children and youth with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM). METHODS: A 6-month trial of pump therapy was carried out in 40 patients with type 1 DM and one with cystic fibrosis (CF) induced DM (25 males), aged 4-25 years (mean 13.5 +/- 4.2 [SD]; 4-8 years, n = 6; 8-10 years, n = 8; 10-12 years, n = 4; 12-15 years, n = 11; >15 years, n = 12). RESULTS: HbA1c was significantly reduced from 9.5 +/- 1.7% to 8.6 +/- 1.2% at 3 months (p < 0.03), and at 6 months 8.8 +/- 1.5% (p < 0.05). The mean daily values of blood glucose, as well as individual mean values of blood glucose at fasting and before lunch, also exhibited a significant reduction (p < 0.05) at 3 and 6 months. There was a significant reduction in the number of hypoglycemic events (level of plasma glucose <3.3 mmol/l, calculated as number of events per patient/30 days) at 3 months (6.5 +/- 5.5 vs 2.8 +/- 3.3; p = 0.02) and at 6 months (6.5 +/- 5.5 vs 3.5 +/- 3.0; p = 0.04). The insulin requirement dropped by 27.2% (1.03 +/- 0.30 U/kg/day before starting CSII; 0.75 +/- 020 U/kg/day on insulin pump therapy onset; 0.76 +/- 0.18 U/kg/day at 3 months; 0.75 +/- 0.21 U/kg/day at 6 months). During the follow-up 0.10 events of diabetic ketoacidosis/patient/year were recorded. The patients exhibited no increase in BMI during the 6 months of follow-up. CONCLUSION: CSII was safe and effective in improving short- and medium-term metabolic control in young adults, adolescents and younger children with DM.