Effects of afferent signals from the extraocular muscles upon units in the cerebellum, vestibular nuclear complex and oculomotor nucleus of the trout

The responses of single units in the cerebellum, the vestibular nuclear complex and adjacent regions of the brainstem and in the oculomotor nucleus were studied in decerebrate, paralysed rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri). Natural vestibular stimulation was provided by horizontal, sinusoidal oscillation of the fish and extraocular muscle afferents of the eye ipsilateral to the recording were activated either by passive eye-movement or by electrical stimulation of the trochlear (IV) nerve in the orbit. Unit responses to vestibular and/or orbital stimuli were examined in peristimulus-time histograms interleaved in time. In the cerebellum and brainstem, of 124 units exposed to both types of stimulus, 26 (21%) responded only to vestibular input, 26 (21%) were affected only by the orbital signal and 23 (18%) received both signals. The remaining 49 units (39%) responded to mechanical stimulation of the head or body or to vibration; they were labelled "polymodal" and discarded. The recording sites of 56 units were verified by histology; 30 were in the cerebellum and 26 in the brainstem. Input from the eye muscles had excitatory or inhibitory effects upon the vestibular responses. The effects of the orbital signal were usually phasic but rare tonic responses also occurred. About half (15 of 34) of the units which responded to passive eye-movement showed statistically significant differences in the magnitude of their responses to horizontal and to vertical eye-movement. More units preferred horizontal movement (11) than preferred vertical passive eye-movement (four). Note that the plane of vestibular stimulation was always horizontal. In the region of the oculomotor nucleus, of 19 units, five (26%) gave vestibular responses only and three (16%) were affected only by the orbital signal; three units (16%) with polymodal responses were discarded. Of the eight units carrying both signals, histological confirmation that the recording site lay in the column of cells forming the oculomotor/trochlear nuclei was obtained in four. The responses and interactions were similar to those found in the brainstem. The results present two principal points of interest. 1. They reinforce the accumulating body of evidence that, in species with widely different oculomotor and visual behaviour, signals from extraocular muscle proprioceptors reach the vestibulo-ocular system; this, in turn, suggests that these signals may play some rather fundamental role in the oculomotor system.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Afferent signals from cat extraocular muscles in the medial vestibular nucleus, the nucleus praepositus hypoglossi and adjacent brainstem structures

The responses of single units in the vestibular nuclei, nucleus praepositus hypoglossi and in the brainstem, deep and posterior to the abducens nucleus, were studied in anaesthetized, paralysed cats. Natural vestibular stimulation was provided by horizontal, sinusoidal oscillation of the animal and extraocular muscle afferents of the ipsilateral eye were activated either by passive eye-movement or by electrical stimulation of the inferior oblique branch of the oculomotor nerve in the orbit. Unit responses to vestibular and/or orbital stimuli were examined in sets of peristimulus time histograms interleaved in time. Of 127 units exposed to both types of stimulus, 40 (32%) responded only to vestibular input; 46 (32%) were affected only by the orbital afferent signal and 19 (15%) received both signals; the remaining 22 units (17%) were discarded because they had polymodal (usually somaesthetic) input. Of the 93 units whose recording sites were determined histologically, 24 were in the medial vestibular nucleus, 16 in the n. praepositus hypoglossi and 45 in the magnocellular nucleus of the reticular formation posterior and deep to the abducens nucleus. In these three nuclei 19 units in total were found which carried the orbital proprioceptive afferent signal and also responded to horizontal vestibular stimulation. The input from the eye muscles proved able to modify the vestibular response by adding excitation or inhibition or both. Effects of the orbital signal were generally phasic. About half of the units which responded to passive eye-movement showed statistically significant differences between their responses to horizontal and to vertical eye-movement. We have shown previously that signals from extraocular muscle proprioceptors reach the vestibulo-oculomotor system in an amphibian and a bony fish; the present experiments show that this is the case in a mammal also. The fact that the visual and visuomotor behaviour of these three species is very different suggests that the proprioceptive signal may play some rather fundamental role in the vestibulo-ocular system. The principal interest of the present results is that they demonstrate that units in the central vestibular system of the cat, in structures which are known to be concerned in oculomotor control, and particularly in the organization of horizontal eye-movement, receive an afferent signal from the eye muscles during passive eye-movement. These brainstem nuclei are known to receive various combinations of input from the vestibular and visual systems and of signals which represent neck movement and eye position and velocity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Input from proprioceptors in the extrinsic ocular muscles to the vestibular nuclei in the giant toad,Bufo marinus

Summary Extracellular unit records were made from the left brain stem of decerebrate, paralysed giant toads (Bufo marinus) during passive movement of the ipsilateral eye. Units in the vestibular nuclear complex (VN) were identified by their short-latency responses to electrical stimulation of the anterior branch of the ipsilateral VIII cranial nerve.Of 58 units in the region of VN, as judged from field potentials to VIII nerve stimulation, fourteen gave phasic excitatory responses to passive movement of the eye and were also identified as vestibular nuclear units. A further twelve units which responded to eye-movement could not be assigned to VN; the remaining 32 units were in VN but did not respond to passive eye-movement. Also, of 16 units whose recording sites were identified histologically in the VN complex, 11 gave responses to vestibular nerve stimulation and to passive eye-movement and 5 responded to eye-movement only.Control experiments eliminated auditory, visual and cutaneous sources for the signal produced by passive eye-movement; thus, the signal must have arisen from intraorbital proprioceptors. Units in VN were also found which were excited by electrical stimulation of the intraorbital part of the fourth (trochlear) nerve; this provides strong evidence that proprioceptors in the extrinsic ocular muscles (EOM) are included in the receptors which provide the signal to VN during passive eye-movement.The effects of vestibular stimulation and of passive eye-movement were found to interact upon units in VN. When passive eye-movement and vestibular stimulation were paired the response to the second stimulus was significantly reduced over a range of interstimulus intervals.The conclusions are that orbital proprioceptive signals, including those from the EOM, project to the vestibular nuclei in the toad and, there, are able to influence processing of vestibular afferent signals. We suggest, therefore, that orbital proprioceptive signals may play a part in oculomotor control. The significance of the results is discussed in relation to the strategic position of the VN in the oculomotor control system.     

The directional effects of passive eye movement on the directional visual responses of single units in the pigeon optic tectum

 We have investigated the visual responses of 184 single units located in the superficial layers of the optic tectum (OT) of the decerebrate, paralysed pigeon. Visual responses were similar to those reported in non-decerebrate preparations; most units responded best to moving visual stimuli, 18% were directionally selective (they had a clear preference for a particular direction of visual stimulus movement), 76% were plane-selective (they responded to movement in either direction in a particular plane). However, we also found that a high proportion of units showed some sensitivity to the orientation of visual stimuli. We examined the effects of extraocular muscle (EOM) afferent signals, induced by passive eye movement (PEM), on the directional visual responses of units. Visual responses were most modified by particular directions of eye movement, although there was no unique relationship between the direction of visual stimulus movement to which an individual unit responded best and the direction of eye movement that caused the greatest modification of that visual response. The results show that EOM afferent signals, carrying information concerning the direction of eye movement, reach the superficial layers of the OT in the pigeon and there modify the visual responses of units in a manner that suggests some role for these signals in the processing of visual information. Received: 17 June 1996 / Accepted: 29 April 1997     

Evidence for corrective effects of afferent signals from the extraocular muscles on single units in the pigeon vestibulo-oculomotor system

The role of extraocular muscle (EOM) afferent feedback signals in the control of eye movement is still controversial. We recorded from 106 single units in the vestibular nuclei, oculomotor nuclei and reticular formation of 80 decerebrate, paralysed pigeons. EOM afferents were stimulated by passive eye movement (PEM) during vestibular stimulation by sinusoidal oscillation in the horizontal plane. We found that EOM afferent signals profoundly modified the vestibular responses of 91 (86%) of the single units recorded. As well as using PEM to simulate eye movements similar to saccades, we moved the eye in a manner which mimicked the slow phase of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (artificial VOR, AVOR). We have found evidence that, as well as providing signals closely related to the parameters of eye movement, PEM alters the vestibular responses of cells during AVOR in a manner which suggests that EOM afferent signals may play a corrective role in the moment-to-moment control of eye movement in the vestibulo-ocular reflex.     

Processing of vestibular inputs by the medullary lateral tegmental field of conscious cats: implications for generation of motion sickness

The dorsolateral reticular formation of the caudal medulla, the lateral tegmental field (LTF), participates in generating vomiting. LTF neurons exhibited complex responses to vestibular stimulation in decerebrate cats, indicating that they received converging inputs from a variety of labyrinthine receptors. Such a convergence pattern of vestibular inputs is appropriate for a brain region that participates in generating motion sickness. Since responses of brainstem neurons to vestibular stimulation can differ between decerebrate and conscious animals, the current study examined the effects of whole-body rotations in vertical planes on the activity of LTF neurons in conscious felines. Wobble stimuli, fixed-amplitude tilts, the direction of which moves around the animal at a constant speed, were used to determine the response vector orientation, and also to ascertain whether neurons had spatial–temporal convergence (STC) behavior (which is due to the convergence of vestibular inputs with different spatial and temporal properties). The proportion of LTF neurons with STC behavior in conscious animals (25 %) was similar to that in decerebrate cats. Far fewer neurons in other regions of the feline brainstem had STC behavior, confirming findings that many LTF neurons receive converging inputs from a variety of labyrinthine receptors. However, responses to vertical plane vestibular stimulation were considerably different in decerebrate and conscious felines for LTF neurons lacking STC behavior. In decerebrate cats, most LTF neurons had graviceptive responses to rotations, similar to those of otolith organ afferents. However, in conscious animals, the response properties were similar to those of semicircular canal afferents. These differences show that higher centers of the brain that are removed during decerebration regulate the labyrinthine inputs relayed to the LTF, either by gating connections in the brainstem or by conveying vestibular inputs directly to the region.     

Excitation of the extraocular muscles in decerebrate cats during the vestibulo-ocular reflex in three-dimensional space

Summary (1) Vestibulo-ocular reflex excitation of the six extraocular muscles was studied by recording their electromyographic activity in decerebrate cats during oscillations about horizontal and vertical axes, at frequencies from 0.07 to 4 Hz. Animals were oriented in many different positions and rotated about axes that lay in the horizontal, frontal, or sagittal planes defined by our coordinate system. (2) The strengths of modulation (gains) of the responses of all extraocular muscles were a sinusoidal function of the orientation of the rotation axis within a coordinate plane, and this function was nearly independent of rotation frequency. (3) The responses were used to determine an axis of maximal excitation for each of the extraocular muscles by the vestibulo-ocular reflex. Antagonistic muscle pairs were found to have best axes in nearly opposite directions, confirming their operation as pairs. (4) Excitation of the medial and lateral rectus could be explained by input from the paired horizontal semicircular canals, with essentially no convergent input from vertical canals. (5) Excitation of the vertical rectus and oblique muscles could be explained by convergent inputs from the vertical canals with little or no horizontal canal input.     

Integration of vestibular and gastrointestinal inputs by cerebellar fastigial nucleus neurons: multisensory influences on motion sickness

Previous studies demonstrated that ingestion of the emetic compound copper sulfate (CuSO₄) alters the responses to vestibular stimulation of a large fraction of neurons in brainstem regions that mediate nausea and vomiting, thereby affecting motion sickness susceptibility. Other studies suggested that the processing of vestibular inputs by cerebellar neurons plays a critical role in generating motion sickness and that neurons in the cerebellar fastigial nucleus receive visceral inputs. These findings raised the hypothesis that stimulation of gastrointestinal receptors by a nauseogenic compound affects the processing of labyrinthine signals by fastigial nucleus neurons. We tested this hypothesis in decerebrate cats by determining the effects of intragastric injection of CuSO₄ on the responses of rostral fastigial nucleus to whole-body rotations that activate labyrinthine receptors. Responses to vestibular stimulation of fastigial nucleus neurons were more complex in decerebrate cats than reported previously in conscious felines. In particular, spatiotemporal convergence responses, which reflect the convergence of vestibular inputs with different spatial and temporal properties, were more common in decerebrate than in conscious felines. The firing rate of a small percentage of fastigial nucleus neurons (15 %) was altered over 50 % by the administration of CuSO₄; the firing rate of the majority of these cells decreased. The responses to vestibular stimulation of a majority of these cells were attenuated after the compound was provided. Although these data support our hypothesis, the low fraction of fastigial nucleus neurons whose firing rate and responses to vestibular stimulation were affected by the administration of CuSO₄ casts doubt on the notion that nauseogenic visceral inputs modulate motion sickness susceptibility principally through neural pathways that include the cerebellar fastigial nucleus. Instead, it appears that convergence of gastrointestinal and vestibular inputs occurs mainly in the brainstem.     

Neck muscle spindle activity in the decerebrate, unparalyzed cat: dynamics and influence of vestibular stimulation

1. Using floating electrodes, we recorded from neck-muscle spindle afferents in the C2 dorsal root ganglion of the decerebrate cat. Nerves to dorsal neck muscles were cut so that the afferents presumably originated mainly from ventral and ventrolateral perivertebral muscles and sternocleidomastoid. One goal of our experiments was to study possible vestibular influence exerted on these spindles via the fusimotor system. Unparalyzed preparations were therefore used. 2. Stimuli consisted of sinusoidal rotations in vertical planes. Neck tilt stretched neck muscles, whereas whole-body tilt stimulated vestibular receptors. 3. For each afferent we first determined the most effective direction of neck tilt, then used stimuli oriented close to this direction to study response dynamics, particularly gain of responses to stimuli of different amplitudes (0.5-7.5 degrees). 4. Three-quarters of the afferents failed to respond to 0.5 degrees, 0.2-Hz neck rotations. Stimuli that were effective usually elicited responses that had low gain and were linear over the whole range of amplitudes. Only a few afferents had behavior typical of spindle primary afferents: high-gain responses to small sinusoidal stimuli, gain decreasing as stimulus amplitude increases. This prevalence of static spindle responses in the unparalyzed cat is in striking contrast to results obtained on neck-muscle spindles in paralyzed, decerebrate cats, and on hindlimb extensor muscle spindles in decerebrate, unparalyzed cats. 5. Paralysis produced by injection of Flaxedil changed the behavior of 2/4 spindle afferents tested, causing the appearance of high-gain responses to 0.5 degrees stimuli and of nonlinear behavior.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Regional blood flow in genetically obese (ob/ob) mice

1. Experiments have been undertaken on 11 decerebrate cats to investigate the effects of natural vestibular stimulation on the activity of cerebellar fastigial neurons. 2. From recordings in the rostral portion of the nucleus during sinusoidal lateral (roll) and horizontal (yaw) rotation, distinctive patterns of response were observed. 3. The majority of neurons sensitive to vestibular stimulation showed responses to a single modality of vestibular activation. During lateral tilt some neurones showed positional sensititivy, others gave responses related tothe velocity of movement. Other neurones responded in phase with the velocity of movement in the horizontal plane. 4. Aside from these neuronal responses, others provided indications of a convergence of inputs from different sets of vestibular receptors. In particular, several neurons showed a pattern of response that indicated tht they received inputs from otolith receptors and ampullar receptors of the vertical canal. At low velocities of movement their response was positional but with inreasing velocity the magnitude of the response increased and there was a marked phase shift of the discharge towards head velocity. 5. Neurons responding to horizontal rotation often showed positional responses during lateral tilt. There were also indications of a convergence of ampullar inputs from both vertical and horizontal canals. 6. The neural pathways mediating these resonses are discussed in consideration of previous neuroanatomical and neurophysiological data. We consider it likely that several pathways may act to evoke the patterns of response observed, and a role of the cerebellar cortex is indicated.     

Firing behavior of vestibular neurons during active and passive head movements: vestibulo-spinal and other non-eye-movement related neurons.

The firing behavior of 51 non-eye movement related central vestibular neurons that were sensitive to passive head rotation in the plane of the horizontal semicircular canal was studied in three squirrel monkeys whose heads were free to move in the horizontal plane. Unit sensitivity to active head movements during spontaneous gaze saccades was compared with sensitivity to passive head rotation. Most units (29/35 tested) were activated at monosynaptic latencies following electrical stimulation of the ipsilateral vestibular nerve. Nine were vestibulo-spinal units that were antidromically activated following electrical stimulation of the ventromedial funiculi of the spinal cord at C1. All of the units were less sensitive to active head movements than to passive whole body rotation. In the majority of cells (37/51, 73%), including all nine identified vestibulo-spinal units, the vestibular signals related to active head movements were canceled. The remaining units (n = 14, 27%) were sensitive to active head movements, but their responses were attenuated by 20-75%. Most units were nearly as sensitive to passive head-on-trunk rotation as they were to whole body rotation; this suggests that vestibular signals related to active head movements were cancelled primarily by subtraction of a head movement efference copy signal. The sensitivity of most units to passive whole body rotation was unchanged during gaze saccades. A fundamental feature of sensory processing is the ability to distinguish between self-generated and externally induced sensory events. Our observations suggest that the distinction is made at an early stage of processing in the vestibular system.     

Eye movement related activity and morphology of second order vestibular neurons terminating in the cat abducens nucleus

Summary Intracellular records were obtained from axons of second order vestibular neurons in, and around, the left abducens nucleus in alert cats implanted with stimulating electrodes on both vestibular nerves and the left VIth nerve. Twelve secondary vestibular neurons were identified by their increase in firing rate with horizontal head rotation to the left and/or increasing eye position to the right. Following HRP injection, somatic location, axonal trajectory and termination sites were determined. Each of the above cells collateralized extensively in the abducens nucleus in a fashion consistent with their being either inhibitory (n = 7; left) or excitatory (n = 6; right) vestibular neurons in the disynaptic horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex pathway. These vestibular neurons also arborized extensively in other posterior brainstem eye-movement related areas as well as sending an axon to the spinal cord.This work was supported by CNRS, NS-13742, and EY-02007     

Canal-otolith interaction in the fastigial nucleus of the alert monkey

To determine the contribution of the otoliths as well as the horizontal and vertical semicircular canals to the response of "vestibular only" neurons in the rostral fastigial nucleus of the alert monkey, we applied natural sinusoidal vestibular stimuli (0.6 Hz; +/-15 deg) around different axes. During the experiment the monkey sat erect in a primate chair with the head immobile. Semicircular canal responses were investigated during tilted yaw stimulation around an earth vertical axis. The tilt angle was varied by 30 deg and included the optimal plane for horizontal canal stimulation (15 deg nose down from the stereotactic plane). The otoliths and mainly the vertical canals made contributions during stimulation around an earth-fixed horizontal axis (vertical stimulation). Head orientation was also slowly altered (2-3 deg/s) over a range of 180 deg under both stimulus conditions (tilted yaw and vertical stimulation). Neuronal data for each paradigm were fitted by a least squares best-sine function. Computation of the hypothetical contributions made by all three pairs of semicircular canals and the otoliths to these responses showed that 74% of the 46 neurons investigated received an otolith input; in most instances it was combined with a canal input. Neurons most often received input from the horizontal and vertical canals as well as the otoliths. Only a minority of neurons received a purely otolith (13%), vertical canal (13%), or horizontal canal (4%) input. Conventional criteria (head position-related activity, spatiotemporal convergence, STC) failed to detect an otolith contribution in several such instances. Thus, canal-otolith convergence is the general rule at this central stage of vestibular information processing in the fastigial nucleus. The large variety of response types allows these neurons to participate in multiple tasks of vestibulospinal movement control.     

Integration of vestibular and head movement signals in the vestibular nuclei during whole-body rotation.

Single-unit recordings were obtained from 107 horizontal semicircular canal-related central vestibular neurons in three alert squirrel monkeys during passive sinusoidal whole-body rotation (WBR) while the head was free to move in the yaw plane (2.3 Hz, 20 degrees /s). Most of the units were identified as secondary vestibular neurons by electrical stimulation of the ipsilateral vestibular nerve (61/80 tested). Both non-eye-movement (n = 52) and eye-movement-related (n = 55) units were studied. Unit responses recorded when the head was free to move were compared with responses recorded when the head was restrained from moving. WBR in the absence of a visual target evoked a compensatory vestibulocollic reflex (VCR) that effectively reduced the head velocity in space by an average of 33 +/- 14%. In 73 units, the compensatory head movements were sufficiently large to permit the effect of the VCR on vestibular signal processing to be assessed quantitatively. The VCR affected the rotational responses of different vestibular neurons in different ways. Approximately one-half of the units (34/73, 47%) had responses that decreased as head velocity decreased. However, the responses of many other units (24/73) showed little change. These cells had signals that were better correlated with trunk velocity than with head velocity. The remaining units had responses that were significantly larger (15/73, 21%) when the VCR produced a decrease in head velocity. Eye-movement-related units tended to have rotational responses that were correlated with head velocity. On the other hand, non-eye-movement units tended to have rotational responses that were better correlated with trunk velocity. We conclude that sensory vestibular signals are transformed from head-in-space coordinates to trunk-in-space coordinates on many secondary vestibular neurons in the vestibular nuclei by the addition of inputs related to head rotation on the trunk. This coordinate transformation is presumably important for controlling postural reflexes and constructing a central percept of body orientation and movement in space.     

Linearity,symmetry and additivity of the human eye-movement response to maintained unilateral and bilateral surface galvanic (DC) vestibular stimulation

Recent studies have shown that, although responses to long-duration, constant-current surface galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) show substantial interindividual variability, individual subjects show a reliable, repeatable, idiosyncratic oculomotor response pattern to GVS. It follows that GVS may be a more reliable stimulus than may have been anticipated from the literature. The aim of the present study was to examine the metrics of 3D eye-movement responses to maintained (120 s), unilateral and bilateral surface GVS. Eye movements were measured using computerised video-oculography. Two experiments were conducted: Experiment 1 examined whether the normal response is linear over increasing levels of current; and Experiment 2 examined (1) whether the normal response to surface GVS is symmetrical when comparing stimulated sides, (2) whether the normal response to surface GVS is symmetrical when the polarity of the stimulating current was reversed, and (3) whether there is additivity in the normal response to combinations of unilateral/bilateral surface GVS. Five subjects participated in Experiment 1 and eight subjects participated in Experiment 2. In both experiments, the onset of stimulation produced characteristic eye-movement responses: changes in torsional position with the upper pole of both eyes rolling towards the anode and away from the cathode; together with horizontal and torsional nystagmus with slow phases towards the anode and away from the cathode; and negligible vertical nystagmus. These responses reversed direction at stimulus offset. In the fixation condition of Experiment 1, the magnitude of ocular torsional position (OTP) and torsional nystagmus responses showed a linear relationship over conditions of increasing current strength, as did OTP, torsional and horizontal nystagmus responses in darkness. The results of Experiment 2 showed that responses to unilateral stimulation are symmetrical between stimulated sides, symmetrical between stimulating polarities, and additive (with respect to responses to bilateral stimulation). The principles derived from these findings, as well as those of recent studies, provide a foundation for future work investigating eye-movement responses to surface GVS in patients with known types of vestibular dysfunction. Electronic Publication     

Effects of natural neck afferent stimulation on vestibulo-spinal neurons in the decerebrate cat

Summary The response patterns of antidromically identified vestibulo-spinal Deiters' neurons and other vestibular nuclear neurons to stimulation of neck receptors and horizontal semicircular canal receptors were investigated in precollicular decerebrate cats.The neck receptors were stimulated by sinusoidal oscillation (frequency 0.2 Hz and 10 ° amplitude) and trapezoidal movements of the cervical axis vertebrae in the horizontal plane, while the head was stereotaxically fixed in a prone position. The influence of horizontal semicircular canal receptors was examined by sinusoidal turntable oscillations (0.2 Hz, 10 °).Out of 151 antidromically driven Deiters' neurons, 16 units responded to neck rotation and 11 cells out of 148 Deiters' neurons were influenced by the horizontal semicircular canal receptors. Only 3 of these neurons were affected by convergent cervical and vestibular influences and revealed antagonistic response patterns. Neck-responsive units were found to be scattered throughout Deiters' nucleus, whereas semicircular-canal-influenced neurons were predominantly encountered in its rostro-ventral part.Altogether, 68 neck-responsive neurons in the vestibular nuclear complex were tested. These units showed a periodic, direction-specific modulation of the discharge rate in response to sinusoidal oscillation. Almost all responses were related to input angular velocity at 0.2 Hz with a mean gain of 1.15 imp/s per deg/s. During trapezoidal neck displacement, responsive units also exhibited tonical components in their discharge rates.These results suggest kinetic-static response characteristics of neck receptors. The cervico-vestibulo-spinal pathway may contribute to tonic neck reflexes; vestibular and neck reflexes may partially interact in Deiters' nucleus.Supported by Sonderforschungsbereich Hirnforschung und Sinnesphysiologie (SFB 70) der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft     

Response of vestibular neurons to head rotations in vertical planes. III. Response of vestibulocollic neurons to vestibular and neck stimulation

1. To compare the properties of the vestibulocollic reflex (VCR) with those of vestibular neurons projecting to the neck [vestibulocollic (VC) neurons], we have studied the behavior of the latter in the decerebrate cat. Neurons were identified by their antidromic responses to stimulation in C1-C2, but not C5. Responses to stimulation of vestibular and neck receptors were produced by rotation of the body and head in vertical planes. 2. We determined the plane of whole body (vestibular) or body with head counter-rotated (neck) rotation, which produced the maximal modulation of each neuron (response vector orientation). Neuron dynamics were then studied with sinusoidal (0.02-2 Hz) stimuli aligned with this orientation. 3. On the basis of dynamics and vector orientation, the neuron was assigned a vestibular input classification of otolith, vertical canal, otolith + canal, or spatial-temporal convergence (STC). 4. The properties of this sample of VC neurons are similar to those of a larger population of vestibular neurons whose projection was not identified. For example, the distributions of cells with different types of vestibular inputs were roughly the same; in particular, few cells showed STC responses. In addition, there was no evidence of significant convergence of like canals across the midline (e.g., right anterior + left anterior). 5. Also similar to the larger unidentified population, 80% of VC neurons tested for neck input received such an input. The neck and vestibular responses tended to be antagonistic; the vector orientations were usually opposite, and the response gains and phases similar.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Taste responses in the parabrachial pons of decerebrate rats

1. Behavioral studies have shown that chronic decerebrate rats retain the capacity to react appropriately to gustatory stimuli (12), but do not form taste-illness associations (13). Little is known, however, about the effects of decerebration on the processing of gustatory information. The present experiment was designed to investigate this issue in the parabrachial nucleus of the pons (PbN). 2. Rats were decerebrated at the supracollicular level under ketamine and ether anesthesia and were prepared for electrical recording in the PbN. Thereafter, animals were maintained under Flaxedil, and wound edges were frequently treated with lidocaine. Heart rate, core temperature, and CO2 were monitored throughout each experiment. Control subjects were treated identically, except that they were not decerebrated. 3. Sapid solutions of NaCl (0.1 M), HCl (0.01 M), sucrose (0.5 M), saccharin sodium (0.004 M), and quinine HCl (.01 M) were used as taste stimuli. After a 10-s base line, each stimulus was bathed over the tongue for 10 s followed by a 10-s wait and a 20-s rinse of distilled water. The intertrial interval was at least 2 min. 4. Gustatory responses from 32 parabrachial units in 13 decerebrate rats were recorded. These were compared with responses in 31 units from the PbN of 16 intact rats. 5. Analysis of response profiles of PbN units in decerebrate rats showed that these units produced smaller responses to NaCl and HCl and larger responses to saccharin sodium compared with units in intact rats. 6. Despite changes in response magnitude, the temporal patterns of response (phasic-tonic relationships) were not different in PbN units in decerebrate rats compared with controls. Differences in the length of responses were, however, apparent. Responses to saccharin sodium were longer, response to NaCl, HCl and sucrose were shorter, and responses to quinine HCl were unchanged. 7. Results of a multidimensional scaling analysis of the response profiles across units showed that "taste spaces" for decerebrate and intact rats were similar. Units in each group were meaningfully placed near stimuli that evoked the best response in a given unit. Units that did not respond well to any stimulus were placed close together regardless of their best stimulus in both taste spaces. 8. Responses to the termination of the taste stimulus (OFF-responses) were observed in PbN units in the decerebrate rat but not in units from the intact rat. Twenty-one OFF-responses were recorded in 14 units; 6 of these occurred in the absence of a response to the stimulus.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Neuron activity in monkey vestibular nuclei during vertical vestibular stimulation and eye movements

To elucidate how information is processed in the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) pathways subserving vertical eye movements, extracellular single-unit recordings were obtained from the vestibular nuclei of alert monkeys trained to track a visual target with their eyes while undergoing sinusoidal pitch oscillations (0.2-1.0 Hz). Units with activity related to vertical vestibular stimulation and/or eye movements were classified as either vestibular units (n = 53), vestibular plus eye-position units (n = 30), pursuit units (n = 10), or miscellaneous units (n = 5), which had various combinations of head- and eye-movement sensitivities. Vestibular units discharged in relation to head rotation, but not to smooth eye movements. On average, these units fired approximately in phase with head velocity; however, a broad range of phase shifts was observed. The activities of 8% of the vestibular units were related to saccades. Vestibular plus eye-position units fired in relation to head velocity and eye position and, in addition, usually to eye velocity. Their discharge rates increased for eye and head movements in opposite directions. During combined head and eye movements, the modulation in unit activity was not significantly different from the sum of the modulations during each alone. For saccades, the unit firing rate either decreased to zero or was unaffected. Pursuit units discharged in relation to eye position, eye velocity, or both, but not to head movements alone. For saccades, unit activity usually either paused or was unaffected. The eye-movement-related activities of the vestibular plus eye-position and pursuit units were not significantly different. A quantitative comparison of their firing patterns suggests that vestibular, vestibular plus eye-position, and pursuit neurons in the vestibular nucleus could provide mossy fiber inputs to the flocculus. In addition, the vertical vestibular plus eye-position neurons have discharge patterns similar to those of fibers recorded rostrally in the medial longitudinal fasciculus. Therefore, our data support the view that vertical vestibular plus eye-position neurons are interneurons of the VOR.     

Direction-selective single units in the nucleus lentiformis mesencephali of the pigeon (Columba livia)

Summary The receptive field properties of single units within the nucleus lentiformis mesencephali (LM) of the pigeon were studied using electrophysiological methods. Previous studies have suggested that the avian LM may be homologous to the nucleus of the optic tract (NOT) in mammals. Single units in the pigeon LM are similar to mammalian NOT units in that they are direction-selective, mostly for horizontal directions, velocity-selective, have large visual receptive fields and respond preferentially to large stimuli with many visual contrasts. In contrast to most reports of NOT units of mammals, more than half of pigeon LM units prefer high velocities (>10°/s), a large proportion (0.37) prefer non-horizontal directions, and receptive fields that are retinotopically arranged within the LM. The response properties of pigeon LM units are compared to the response properties of units within the accessory optic nucleus (the nucleus of the basal optic root or nBOR). In the avian brain, nBOR neurons respond at low velocities (0.5–5°/s) and respond predominantly to vertical stimulus movement whereas LM units respond over a broader range of velocities (0.2–80°/s) and respond predominantly to horizontal movements. Thus, the LM and nBOR may play different roles in the control of compensatory eye movements.This work was supported in part by PHS grant EY03638 to BJW and NSF grant BNS 8312571 to SEB