Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and echocardiographic left ventricular wall thickness and mass

In a highly select group of stable hypertensive patients, we have assessed the strength of association between various blood pressure measurements (24 h average automated ambulatory blood pressure, 4 h automated ambulatory morning average blood pressure, multiple office visit average blood pressure, and a single office visit average blood pressure) and various echocardiographic indices of hypertensive cardiac target organ damage (left atrial diameter, left ventricular end diastolic diameter, posterior wall thickness, combined wall thickness, relative wall thickness, left ventricular mass and mass index, and combined wall thickness/left ventricular diastolic diameter ratio). These data demonstrated that a single 24 h average diastolic blood pressure by automatic noninvasive ambulatory monitoring was a significantly better predictor of echocardiographic posterior wall thickness, combined wall thickness or relative wall thickness than the multiple office or single office average diastolic blood pressure. Also there were highly significant correlations between both 24 h average systolic and diastolic blood pressure and these echocardiographic parameters (in descending order of correlation coefficient): combined wall thickness, posterior wall thickness, combined wall thickness/left ventricular diastolic diameter, left ventricular mass index, relative wall thickness, and left ventricular mass. Left ventricular end diastolic dimension did not linearly correlate with any systolic or diastolic blood pressure measurement. Left atrial dimension demonstrated only a significant association with 24 h average diastolic blood pressure. Single office average blood pressure did not linearly correlate with any echocardiographic parameter.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Prevalence and determinants of left ventricular diastolic filling abnormalities in an unselected hypertensive population

The independent contribution of age, sex, duration of hypertension, heart rate, clinic and ambulatory blood pressure and echocardiographic left ventricular mass to left ventricular diastolic filling abnormalities in essential hypertension was investigated in 250 subjects (145 untreated and unselected hypertensives and 105 healthy normotensive controls) undergoing Doppler and standard echocardiography and non-invasive 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Late and early diastolic transmitral peak flow velocities and their ratio (all P less than 0.01), the rate of deceleration of early diastolic mitral flow (P less than 0.01) and the time of deceleration of early diastolic mitral flow (P = 0.018) were abnormal in the hypertensive group vs controls. None of these parameters significantly varied in the presence vs absence of LV hypertrophy. In the hypertensive group, the prevalence of abnormal age-corrected Doppler values varied up to 46% (up to 45.4% and 50% in the absence and presence of left ventricular hypertrophy, respectively; P = n.s.). In a stepwise multivariate regression analysis, age and average daytime or night-time ambulatory blood pressure showed a significant independent relationship with each of these Doppler indexes of left ventricular diastolic filling. Late transmitral peak flow velocity and the ratio of late to early peak flow velocity were also independently affected by the heart rate. Sex, duration of hypertension, clinic systolic and diastolic blood pressure and left ventricular mass index did not show any independent relationship to these Doppler parameters of left ventricular filling. In conclusion, Doppler abnormalities of diastolic transmitral blood flow were detected in up to 46% of patients in an unselected hypertensive population with a low prevalence (14.5%) of left ventricular hypertrophy. Age and ambulatory blood pressure, but not sex, duration of hypertension, clinic blood pressure and left ventricular mass itself, were the major independent determinants of these abnormalities.     

Blood pressure load determines left ventricular mass in essential hypertension.

In a series of 35 newly diagnosed, previously untreated patients (mean age 46 years) with mild to moderate essential hypertension, office blood pressure measurements, 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, and determination of left ventricular mass index by echocardiography according to the formula of Devereux were performed. We aimed at correlating left ventricular mass index with systolic and diastolic office blood pressure, mean 24-hour systolic and mean 24-hour diastolic blood pressure, systolic and diastolic load. Left ventricular mass index did not correlate with office systolic and office diastolic blood pressure. On the contrary, all correlations with ambulatory blood pressure parameters and left ventricular mass index turned out to be significant (mean 24-hour systolic blood pressure: r = 0.344, P = 0.026; systolic load: r = 0.408, P = 0.020; mean 24-hour diastolic blood pressure: r = 0.490, P = 0.004; diastolic load: r = 0.504, P = 0.003). These results clearly demonstrate that ambulatory blood pressure determinants but not the office blood pressure parameters are well correlated with left ventricular mass index in mild to moderate essential hypertension. Blood pressure load is as important as mean 24-hour blood pressure in this regard.     

White-coat effect in normotension and hypertension

OBJECTIVES: The difference between clinic and daytime ambulatory blood pressure is referred to as the white-coat effect. In this study, we investigated (i) the magnitude of the white-coat effect in subjects with different daytime ambulatory blood pressure levels, and (ii) the association of the white-coat effect with left ventricular mass. METHODS: A total of 1581 subjects underwent clinic blood pressure readings, 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and left ventricular echocardiographic assessment. Their mean daytime systolic blood pressure varied from 88.0 to 208.9 mmHg and their mean daytime diastolic blood pressure from 40.3 to 133.0 mmHg. RESULTS: A negative correlation was found between the systolic or diastolic white-coat effect and the systolic or diastolic daytime ambulatory blood pressure (r = -0.22, P < 0.000 and r = -0.50, P < 0.000, respectively). Left ventricular mass significantly correlated with ambulatory blood pressure (P < 0.001), but there was no association between left ventricular mass and clinic blood pressure or white-coat effect. Furthermore, the white-coat effect was reversed at the highest level of systolic or diastolic daytime ambulatory blood pressure (systolic over 170 mmHg or diastolic over 100 mmHg) when systolic or diastolic daytime ambulatory blood pressure was higher than systolic or diastolic clinic blood pressure (ambulatory blood pressure hypertension). CONCLUSIONS: The white-coat effect shows an inverse association with daytime ambulatory blood pressure level (systolic or diastolic), being significantly more prominent for levels below 140/80 mmHg for systolic/diastolic daytime ambulatory blood pressure and reversed with daytime ambulatory blood pressure levels above 170/100 mmHg.     

Factors correlated with left ventricular mass in hypertensive patients

Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is an independent risk factor in hypertensive patient. THE AIM: Of our study is to evaluate prospectively the relationship between left ventricular mass and clinical, echocardiographical and ambulatory blood pressure data in hypertensive subjects. METHODS: We studied 88 hypertensive patient who underwent clinical and laboratory investigation, echocardiography and 24 hours ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Correlations were made between these data and left ventricular mass. RESULTS: Clinical data, which correlated well with left ventricular mass, were duration of hypertension, systolic arterial pressure and pulse arterial pressure. In echocardiography left atrial area and left ventricular dysfunction correlated significatively with left ventricular mass. Data from 24 hours blood pressure monitoring as daytime systolic pressure, nighttimes diastolic pressure, ambulatory systolic pressure and ambulatory pulse pressure. CONCLUSION: In hypertensive patient, left ventricular mass correlated well with left atrial dilation and diastolic left ventricular dysfunction. It also correlated with 24 hours ambulatory blood pressure monitoring data.     

Ambulatory blood pressure predicts end-organ damage only in subjects with reproducible recordings. HARVEST Study Investigators. Hypertension and Ambulatory Recording Venetia Study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the prediction of target-organ damage varies according to the reproducibility of 24 h blood pressure. SETTING: Seventeen hypertension clinics in northeast Italy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Correlations of left ventricular mass index and albumin excretion rate with 24 h and office blood pressures in relation to tertiles of ambulatory blood pressure reproducibility. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 716 consecutive, stage I, hypertensives enrolled in the Hypertension and Ambulatory Recording Venetia Study (HARVEST), ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was performed twice, 3 months apart In all subjects, the albumin excretion rate was measured by radioimmunoassay, and in 567, the left ventricular mass index was assessed by echocardiography. RESULTS: The subjects were divided into tertiles of ambulatory blood pressure consistency (between-monitoring differences, regardless of the sign). In the tertile of subjects with good reproducibility, correlation coefficients of systolic and diastolic ambulatory blood pressure with left ventricular mass and urinary albumin excretion were significant and higher than those of office blood pressure. In contrast, in the two tertiles with poorer reproducibility, the coefficients were barely or not significant for both pressures. The advantage of ambulatory blood pressure over office blood pressure in predicting target-organ damage was no longer present for systolic blood pressure differences greater than 3.8 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure differences greater than 3.1 mmHg. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that ambulatory blood pressure is a better predictor of left ventricular mass and urinary albumin excretion than office blood pressure, but only in subjects with good pressure reproducibility. Therefore, the assessment of hypertensive patients should be based on duplicate blood pressure monitorings. Recordings with 24 h systolic and diastolic blood pressure differences greater than 4 and 3 mmHg, respectively, should be considered with caution.     

Reproducibility of nurse-measured, exercise and ambulatory blood pressure and echocardiographic left ventricular mass in borderline hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the short-term reproducibility of four diagnostic tests: resting blood pressure, exercise blood pressure, non-invasive daytime ambulatory blood pressure and echocardiographic left ventricular mass. DESIGN: Blinded, prospective test-retest (reliability) study. SETTING: Hypertension research units in two teaching hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Six normal volunteers and 22 patients with untreated borderline to mild hypertension, mean age 44 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The intraclass correlation coefficient (RI) and standard deviation of the difference (SDD) between visits. MAIN RESULTS: The mean blood pressures and left ventricular mass did not differ between visits. Concordance between visits reached RI = 0.86 systolic/0.66 diastolic for ambulatory blood pressure and RI = 0.85 systolic/0.64 diastolic for nurse-measured random-zero sphygmomanometer resting blood pressure. The respective variabilities were SDD = 9/8 and 8/8 mmHg. Submaximal exercise systolic blood pressure (SBP) and echo left ventricular mass showed excellent reliability. Echo left ventricular mass and resting SBP or ambulatory SBP were significantly more reproducible than resting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) or ambulatory DBP. CONCLUSIONS: Despite averaging many readings within each day, clinically important between-visit variations in ambulatory blood pressure remained. The between-visit variability of daytime ambulatory blood pressure was similar to that of resting blood pressure when carefully measured by a research nurse. The echo left ventricular mass appears to be more reproducible over the short term than the current diagnostic standard for hypertension, the resting DBP.     

Comparison between office and ambulatory blood pressure in young and elderly subjects with isolated systolic hypertension

BACKGROUND: It has been claimed that isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) in the elderly is not a sustained condition but a short-lasting increase in office systolic blood pressure magnified by arterial stiffness. DESIGN: Office and ambulatory blood pressures werecompared at baseline and after 3 months of observation of young and elderly subjects with ISH. METHODS: The study was carried out in 39 young (mean age 27.1+/-9.8 years) and 37 elderly patients (mean age 72.5+/-5.7 years). Office blood pressure was defined as the mean of six readings. All subjects underwent two non-invasive 24 h blood pressure monitorings performed 3 months apart and echocardiography (n = 50). RESULTS: The difference between office and mean 24 h systolic/diastolic blood pressure was 27.9/8.2 mmHg in the young and 18.9/6.9 mmHg in the elderly patients (P < 0.01 for systolic blood pressure). Twenty-four-hour (P < 0.001), daytime (P = 0.001) and night-time (P < 0.001) systolic blood pressures were higher in the elderly and the difference between daytime and night-time systolic blood pressure was greater in the young (P < 0.05). Office and ambulatory heart rates were significantly higher in the young subjects. The elderly patients showed a greater left ventricular wall thickness ( P = 0.005 for posterior wall; P < 0.005 for septum), relative wall thickness (P = 0.01) and left ventricular mass index (P = 0.001) and impaired left ventricular filling rate ( P = 0.05), whereas systolic performance and stroke volume were no different in the two groups. Due to the higher heart rate, cardiac output was greater in the young (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: These data show that larger differences between office and ambulatory systolic blood pressure are not unique to elderly patients with ISH. Increased ambulatory blood pressure levels and a decreased nocturnal blood pressure fall were associated with left ventricular structural and functional abnormalities in the elderly subjects.     

Nocturnal systolic hypertension is a risk factor for cardiac damage in the untreated masked hypertensive patients

The nocturnal blood pressure (BP) has been identified as a prognostic factor for cardiovascular events. This study aimed to investigate the association between different patterns of nocturnal masked hypertension (MH) and the echocardiographic parameters in the untreated nocturnal MH patients. A total of 721 untreated MH patients (309 females and 412 males, mean age = 56.59 ± 15.20 years) from June 2006 and June 2016 were included and divided into nocturnal systolic MH (n = 77), nocturnal diastolic MH (n = 232), and nocturnal systolic/diastolic MH (n = 412) groups according to the ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Baseline characteristics, office BP values, ambulatory BP monitoring parameters, and echocardiographic parameters were compared among the three groups. The independent factors associated with echocardiographic parameters were analyzed by multivariate linear regression. The nocturnal systolic group had the highest ratio of males, mean age, and office systolic BP (SBP), and the lowest office, 24‐hour, daytime, nocturnal diastolic BP and heart rate among the three groups. The nocturnal diastolic group had the lowest interventricular septum (IVS) thickness, left atrium (LA) dimension, and left ventricular (LV) mass among the three groups. Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that 24‐hour, daytime, and nocturnal SBPs were all positively associated with LA dimension, IVS thickness, and LV mass (all B were positive and P < .050). Pearson's correlation analysis showed that nocturnal SBP was positively correlated with LA dimension, IVS thickness, and LV mass. These results suggested that different patterns of nocturnal MH had different echocardiographic outcomes. Nocturnal SBP was the independent factor associated with the echocardiographic parameters.     

Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function assessed with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography in “white coat” hypertension

Objectives. The aim of this study was to investigate left ventricular function in subjects with “white coat” hypertension, defined as office arterial diastolic pressure ≥90 and ambulatory daytime pressure < 140/90mm Hg.Background. The white coat arterial pressure response may, by influencing left ventricular function, have a confounding effect in studies of heart disease.Methods. Two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography, combined with the calibrated subclavian arterial pulse tracing, were used to assess variables of left ventricular function in 26 subjects with white coat hypertension, as well as 22 subjects with previously untreated ambulatory hypertension (office arterial diastolic pressure ≥90 and <115 mm Hg and ambulatory daytime diastolic pressure ≥90 mm Hg) and 32 normotensive subjects.Results. In subjects with white coat hypertension, systolic arterial pressure during the echocardiographic examination was significantly higher than ambulatory daytime systolic pressure. This pressure response was positively related to the ratio of the systolic to diastolic pulmonary venous flow peak velocities and to the peak velocity of flow reversion during atrial systole; it was inversely related to the ratio of early to late mitral flow peak velocities. Left ventricular stroke volume, ejection fraction and velocity of circumferential fiber shortening did not differ in the study groups, but left ventricular external work and end-systolic wall stress were increased in the white coat group.Conclusions. The arterial pressure response in subjects with white coat hypertension is associated with increased left ventricular external work, increased end-systolic wall stress and alterations of left ventricular filling but normal ejection fraction and velocity of circumferential fiber shortening.     

Correlation between arterial pressure at rest and during effort and left ventricular mass in hypertensive patients who were never treated

A poor correlation has been found between blood pressure at rest and left ventricular mass in the course of several echocardiographic studies on hypertensive patients. The aim of this work was to determine if this finding could be the result of previous antihypertensive therapy, which had been suspended a few weeks previously in most of the studies. In addition, we tested whether blood pressure values during physical exercise correlate with the echocardiographic indices of left ventricular mass better than the values at rest. In our group of 43 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension who had never been pharmacologically treated, the correlation between both systolic and diastolic blood pressure and left ventricular mass was poor (r = 0.41 and 0.30 respectively). This result suggests that one or more factors other than hypertension may determine the development of left ventricular hypertrophy. However, in 10 patients with left ventricular hypertrophy a more significant correlation was found between cardiac mass and diastolic pressure (r = 0.52), rather than systolic pressure (r = 0.33). This finding supports data indicating that cardiovascular risk is related more to diastolic pressure increments than to systolic pressure. As for blood pressure values during physical exercise, in our study they did not show a better predictivity of ventricular mass than the values at rest.     

Cardiac damage in hypertensive patients with inverse white coat hypertension. Hospitalet study

BACKGROUND: Few studies have assessed the relationship between ambulatory blood pressure (BP) and cardiac damage in essential hypertensive patients with inverse white coat hypertension (IWCH). OBJECTIVES: To determine the frequency of IWCH in untreated grade 1-2 hypertension and to assess possible differences in cardiac damage among patients with IWCH, white coat hypertension (WCH) and the rest of patients with grade 1-2 hypertension. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred and eleven patients with grade 1-2 hypertension were sequentially included. A good quality 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring was obtained in 204 patients (age: 41 +/- 12 years, 56% males). IWCH was defined as a daytime systolic and/or diastolic BP higher than diagnostic office systolic and/or diastolic BP, respectively. WCH was defined as a daytime BP < 135/85 mmHg. A good quality echocardiogram was obtained in 174 patients. We considered left ventricular hypertrophy a left ventricular mass index (LVMI) > or = 125 g/m2. RESULTS: We found IWCH in 29 subjects (14%), and WCH in 68 (33%). Office BP in patients with IWCH was in an intermediate position between WCH and the rest of grade 1-2 hypertension patients. The IWCH patients showed 24-h, daytime and night-time BP higher than the other groups. Left ventricular mass was significantly greater in patients with IWCH than in the other grade 1-2 hypertension patients after adjusting for age, gender, body mass index, smoking and office BP (regression coefficient 28.14, 95%CI: 7.36-48.91). CONCLUSION: IWCH is independently associated with higher values of left ventricular mass in patients with grade 1-2 hypertension.     

The trained observer better predicts daytime ABPM diastolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients than does an automated (Omron) device

OBJECTIVES: Accurate blood pressure measurement is critical to successful clinical trials. Concerns about observer errors have led to the use of automated oscillometric devices without evidence that their performance is similar to that of trained observers. This study compares blood pressures obtained by trained observers and with an oscillometric device (Omron 705CP) to 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. METHODS: We performed a post-hoc analysis of 313 untreated hypertensive patients at the end of the washout phase of a Novartis hypertension trial. Patients had three seated trained observer mercury auscultatory blood pressure measurements followed by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. The next day, the ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was removed and three seated readings were obtained with an Omron 705CP. Correlations for systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure were obtained between daytime ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (0900 and 2100) and the two office methods. In addition, we investigated the degree of difference of trained observer and Omron measurements from ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. RESULTS: For systolic blood pressure, the correlation with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring of the trained observer was significantly better than with that of the Omron 705CP (0.641 vs. 0.555, P=0.01). For diastolic blood pressure values, even greater disparity between the two office method correlations with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was observed (trained observer=0.593 vs. Omron=0.319, P<0.0001). Both trained observer and Omron readings were consistently higher than ambulatory blood pressure monitoring for systolic blood pressure (P<0.0001) and diastolic blood pressure (P<0.0001). Omron measurements, however, deviated from ambulatory blood pressure monitoring more than those of the trained observer (P<0.0001 for systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure). CONCLUSIONS: For clinical trials using diastolic blood pressure targets, the Omron 705CP cannot replace the auscultatory blood pressure measurements of a trained observer. For systolic blood pressure, the Omron device and the trained observer had similar correlations with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; however, both methods gave consistently higher systolic blood pressure values. Further study of oscillometric devices should be conducted before universally replacing auscultatory blood pressure determinations by trained observers in clinical trials.     

Cardiac arrhythmias and left ventricular hypertrophy in dipper and nondipper patients with essential hypertension

To evaluate the behavior of cardiac arrhythmias in dipper and nondipper hypertensive patients, 48-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, 24-h Holter electrocardiogram recording and echocardiographic studies were performed in 56 untreated outpatients with essential hypertension. These patients were divided into 2 groups according to the presence (dipper, n=33) or absence (nondipper, n=23) of reduction of both systolic and diastolic blood pressure during nighttime by an average of more than 10% of daytime blood pressure. Mean 48-h systolic and diastolic blood pressures did not differ between the 2 groups. Nondipper patients had a significantly larger left atrial dimension (31.9+/-3.8 vs 35.6+/-3.7 mm; p<0.01), left ventricular mass index (114+/-26 vs 136+/-36 g/m2; p<0.05), as well as a larger number of total supraventricular (16+/-19 vs 89+/-197 beats; p<0.05) and ventricular ectopic beats (7+/-14 vs 47+/-96 beats; p<0.05) during daytime as compared with dippers. In conclusion, nondipper hypertensive patients are likely to experience supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias more frequently than dippers. A blunted nocturnal blood pressure fall may be involved in the appearance of cardiac arrhythmias in patients with essential hypertension.     

Blood pressure pattern importance in the development of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertension.

Heterogeneous results regarding correlations between blood pressure, (measured by various methods and in different conditions), and left ventricular mass in arterial hypertension have been reported. Fifty-three essential hypertensives, I-II WHO stage, have been studied in order to verify the relationship between office and average 24-hour blood pressure, and its day- and night-time pattern with left ventricular hypertrophy. All patients had newly diagnosed essential hypertension, and no subject had received any antihypertensive therapy before entry. The subjects underwent 24-hour blood pressure monitoring, evaluating the average of 24 hours, day- and night-time blood pressures, and M-mode echocardiography. Neither subjects with nor without left ventricular hypertrophy showed correlations between office blood pressure and left ventricular mass. On the contrary, average 24-hour systolic and diastolic blood pressure resulted related to left ventricular mass (r = 0.36 and 0.40, p less than 0.01 respectively). Furthermore, in the subgroup with left ventricular hypertrophy, left ventricular mass was correlated directly with nocturnal systolic blood pressure (r = 0.46) and inversely with the rate of nocturnal decrease in systolic pressure (r = -0.60, p less than 0.01). These results appear to confirm the usefulness of 24-hour blood pressure monitoring in evaluating cardiac afterload in essential hypertension, and the important role that the 24-hour systolic pressure has in the development of left ventricular hypertrophy in these subjects.     

Left ventricular relaxation and ambulatory blood pressure in mild, untreated arterial hypertension

Twenty patients with mild, untreated arterial hypertension had ambulatory blood pressure recordings and a digitized echocardiographic study of the left ventricle with measurement of its mass (LVM) and of relaxation parameters. A significant correlation was found between LVM and ambulatory systolic pressure during daytime (r = 0.64; p less than 0.01; n = 20) and during 24 hours (r = 0.79; p less than 0.001; n = 16). One of the relaxation parameters studied, the time taken to reach maximal speed of left ventricular enlargement, was closely related to the diurnal diastolic blood pressure (r = 0.58; p less than 0.01; n = 20), whereas in this population with mild arterial blood pressure none of the parameters was related to the amount of increase of LVM. One may therefore consider the abnormalities of left ventricular relaxation as likely to appear at an early stage of arterial hypertension; their discovery may antedate that of LVM and confirm that the hypertensive disease is real. However, the methodological problems encountered with type of exploration ought to be stressed: left ventricular relaxation is a multifactorial phenomenon, and its echocardiographic approach is subject to many hazards.     

Casual, ambulatory and stress blood pressure: relationships with left ventricular mass and filling

In arterial hypertension, casual blood pressure seems to be weakly related to the level of cardiac involvement. The aim of the present study was to assess if blood pressure during ambulatory monitoring, and during different stress tests, is a stronger predictor of anatomical and functional changes observed in hypertensive heart disease. To this aim, 29 untreated patients with borderline-to-moderate essential hypertension underwent an echo-Doppler evaluation to determine left ventricular thickness and mass. From transmitral flow, the ratio between late and early filling velocities (A/E ratio) was used to assess left ventricular diastolic behaviour. On the same day that ultrasonic study was carried out, we also measured a set of casual blood pressures; conducted a mental arithmetic test (standardized series of mental subtractions); a handgrip test (30% of maximum voluntary contraction for 3 minutes); and performed noninvasive ambulatory monitoring of blood pressure (Spacelabs 5200). Significant relationships were observed between left ventricular mass and both night-time systolic blood pressure (r = 0.46, P less than 0.02) and peak systolic blood pressure during mental stress (r = 0.39, P less than 0.05). The A/E ratio was significantly associated with casual systolic and diastolic blood pressure (r = 0.45, P less than 0.02; r = 0.38, P less than 0.05, respectively); day-time diastolic blood pressure (r = 0.47, P less than 0.02); night-time systolic and diastolic blood pressure (r = 0.44, P less than 0.05; r = 0.42, P less than 0.05 respectively); and peak systolic blood pressure during the mental arithmetic test (r = 0.44, P less than 0.05). Our results seem to confirm the presence of a relationship between causal blood pressure and left ventricular filling. Moreover, the transmitral flow seems to be dependent on both mean levels of blood pressure on ambulatory monitoring and systolic blood pressure during mental stress. As concerns left ventricular mass, the correlations observed support the weakness of the links between blood pressure and left ventricular anatomy.     

Circadian blood pressure changes and left ventricular hypertrophy in essential hypertension

The effects of circadian blood pressure (BP) changes on the echocardiographic parameters of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy were investigated in 235 consecutive subjects (137 unselected untreated patients with essential hypertension and 98 healthy normotensive subjects) who underwent 24-hour noninvasive ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and cross-sectional and M-mode echocardiography. In the hypertensive group, LV mass index correlated with nighttime (8:00 PM to 6:00 AM) systolic (r = 0.51) and diastolic (r = 0.35) blood pressure more closely than with daytime (6:00 AM to 8:00 PM) systolic (r = 0.38) and diastolic (r = 0.20) BP, or with casual systolic (r = 0.33) and diastolic (r = 0.27) BP. Hypertensive patients were divided into two groups by presence (group 1) and absence (group 2) of a reduction of both systolic and diastolic BP during the night by an average of more than 10% of the daytime pressure. Casual BP, ambulatory daytime systolic and diastolic BP, sex, body surface area, duration of hypertension, prevalence of diabetes, quantity of sleep during monitoring, funduscopic changes, and serum creatinine did not differ between the two groups. LV mass index, after adjustment for the age, the sex, the height, and the daytime BP differences between the two groups (analysis of covariance) was 82.4 g/m2 in the normotensive patient group, 83.5 g/m2 in hypertensive patients of group 1 and 98.3 g/m2 in hypertensive patients of group 2 (normotensive patients vs. group 1, p = NS; group 1 vs. group 2, p = 0.002).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Blood pressure control in a hypertension hospital clinic.

OBJECTIVES: First, to evaluate the prevalence of clinic blood pressure (BP) control (BP < or = 140/90 mm Hg) in a representative sample of treated hypertensive patients followed in our hypertension clinic. Second, to assess in a subgroup of these patients: (a) the proportion of BP control with both clinic blood pressure (CBP < or =140/90 mm Hg) and daytime ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) (< or =132/85 mm Hg) criteria, and (b) the prevalence of echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) (left ventricular mass index, LVMI>125 g/m2 in men and >110 g/m2 in women). DESIGN AND METHODS: Seven hundred consecutive hypertensive patients who attended our hypertension centre clinic during a period of 6 months and who had regularly been followed up by the same medical team were included in the study. BP was taken in the clinic by a doctor using a mercury sphygmomanometer with the participants seated. Seventy-four patients with similar demographic and clinical characteristics to the entire population of participants underwent complete echocardiographic examination and 24 h ABP monitoring. RESULTS: During follow-up, 352 of the treated patients had clinic BP < or =140/90 mm Hg, 198< or =160/95 mm Hg and 150>160/95 mm Hg, indicating that BP control was satisfactory in 50.3%, borderline in 28.3% and unsatisfactory in 21.4% of the cases. In the subgroup of 74 patients, the proportion of individuals with satisfactory clinic BP control (CBP< or =140/90 mm Hg) was higher (50.0 versus 33.6%) than with satisfactory ABP control (daytime ABP values < or =132/85 mm Hg). LVH was found in 21 of the 74 patients (28.3%): 12 of them had unsatisfactory CBP control and 19 had unsatisfactory ABP control. LVMI did not correlate with CBP values but only with ABP values (mean 24 h systolic r = 0.47, diastolic r = 0.40, P<0.001; mean daytime systolic r = 0.45, mean daytime diastolic r = 0.39, P<0.001; mean night-time systolic r = 0.38, mean night-time diastolic r = 0.38, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that hypertensive patients managed in a hypertension centre clinic have satisfactory CBP control in 50% of cases, but this rate seems to over-estimate the effective BP control during daily life. A large fraction of patients show persistence of LVH and this evidence of organ damage almost entirely concerns individuals with poor ABP control.     

BP as a determinant of cardiac left ventricular muscle mass

The relationship between casual BPs and measures of cardiac hypertrophy, derived from the ECG, has been described as fairly weak. In this study, ECG and echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular muscle mass were related to various measures of BP obtained during circadian ambulatory BP monitoring in 12 patients with hypertension. Casual BP did not correlate substantially with ECG voltages or with echocardiographic measurements of muscle mass. The correlations between whole-day, daytime, or nighttime BP averages and ECG voltages were not significant. However, echocardiographic left ventricular muscle mass correlated significantly with the averages of whole-day, daytime, and nighttime, and two-hour morning systolic pressures. The correlations between diastolic BP and left ventricular muscle mass were not significant. Therefore, serial BP measurements are required to evaluate the relationship between BP and left ventricular muscle mass as measured by the M-mode echocardiogram. The ECG is of little value in this relationship.