索拉非尼联合TACE治疗肝癌复发生存期影响因素预测模型建立

<正>原发性肝癌是消化系统常见恶性肿瘤,手术治疗效果欠佳,而肝移植术是目前最有效的治疗方式,但肝移植术后肝癌复发的发生率较高,严重影响患者生存率。射频消融、肝动脉灌注化疗栓塞术(TACE)、索拉非尼等均是肝移植术后肝癌复发的常见干预手段,但干预效果大多不理想^[1,2]。有文献报道索拉非尼联合TACE治疗对于肝移植术后肝癌复发的干预效果优于手术切除、射频消融等,在一定程度上提高生存率,明确影响肝移植术后肝癌复发患者生存期的影响因素,     

索拉非尼联合TACE治疗进展期原发性肝癌的临床研究

目的探究分析索拉非尼(Sorafenib)联合肝动脉栓塞化疗(TACE)治疗进展期原发性肝癌的临床疗效及并发症。方法选取2011年1月至2014年6月期间我院收治的进展期原发性肝癌患者86例作为临床研究对象,按照患者入院顺序将其分为联合治疗试验组和单纯治疗对照组,每组各43例,对照组采用单纯TACE治疗,试验组在其基础上术后加用索拉非尼治疗,比较两组患者治疗前与满疗程治疗后半年甲胎蛋白(AFP)、白蛋白(Alb)、总胆红素(TBil)、ALT及AST等肝功能指标变化情况,对比两组患者半年随访期内并发症发生情况,同时记录和观察两组患者术后2年生存率及死亡率情况。结果两组患者接受治疗前,组间AFP、AST、TBil、ALT及Alb水平均差异无统计学意义(t=1.32、1.35、1.73、2.01、1.77,P均0.05),行不同治疗后,两组患者AFP指标水平均明显降低,TBil、ALT、AST及Alb水平明显升高,且试验组患者AFP、AST、TBil、ALT及Alb水平均明显低于对照组(P均0.05)。半年随访期内,试验组患者出现皮肤反应、胃肠反应、、肝区疼痛、骨髓移植、高胆红素血症以及其他并发症的几率均明显低于对照组(P均0.05),组间差异具有显著统计学意义。试验组患者术后1年、2年生存率及中位生存期均明显高于对照组患者(P均0.05),其术后1年死亡率和2年死亡率也较对照组明显偏低(P均0.05),组间差异具有统计学意义。结论 TACE治疗进展期原发性肝癌具有一定的临床疗效,在此基础上联合使用索拉非尼可有效抑制肝癌的进展,同时明显改善患者肝功能和术后生活质量,安全窗广。     

松香联合索拉非尼治疗中晚期原发性肝癌疗效评价

目的观察松香联合索拉菲尼治疗中晚期PLC患者的临床疗效。方法我院2013年5月~2014年5月收住的中晚期PLC患者38例,随机分为松香联合索拉菲尼治疗18例和索拉菲尼治疗20例。松香丸为我院自制药丸,20 g内服,2次/d。两组平均服药157.4（40~218） d。参照实体瘤疗效评价标准评价目标病灶变化。采用化学发光微粒子免疫分析技术测定血清AFP。结果治疗后3月,中西医结合治疗组CR、PR、SD和PD分别为0.0%、11.1%、72.2%和16.7%,而索拉菲尼组则分别为0.0%、5.0%、55.0%和20.0%,前者临床获益率显著高于索拉菲尼组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;中西医结合治疗组治疗后血清AFP为（544.2±95.5） g/L,显著低于索拉菲尼治疗组[（824.5±89.4）g/L,P<0.05];治疗后12个月,中西医结合治疗组生存率（50.0%）显著高于索拉菲尼治疗组[15%,P<0.05]。结论松香联合索拉非尼治疗中晚期PLC患者可以提高临床疗效。     

TACE联合索拉非尼对原发性肝癌的疗效及其预后相关影响因素

目的探讨TACE联合索拉非尼对原发性肝癌的疗效及其预后相关影响因素分析。方法选取我科收治的收治的120例中晚期PLC患者,根据治疗方式的不同,分为研究组及对照组两组(各60例),其中研究组(采用TACE联合索拉非尼治疗)和对照组(采用TACE治疗),比较2组患者的临床疗效等差异。结果研究组患者治疗后的临床总有效率(73.33%)显著高于对照组患者(48.33%)患者(P0.05);研究组患者皮肤反应的发生率显著高于对照组(P0.05),而两组患者在恶心呕吐、腹痛腹泻、肝功能异常及白细胞下降方面的不良反应发生率比较,均无统计学差异(P0.05); Child pugh分级、甲胎蛋白、肿瘤血管侵犯、口服索拉非尼、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值、肿瘤平均直径及谷丙转氨酶均对中晚期PLC患者的总生存率有影响(均P0.05);经Logistic回归分析,发现术前AFP400 ng/mL、术前中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值≥1.77及肿瘤平均直径5 cm是中晚期PLC患者治疗后影响预后效果的危险因素(均P0.05)。结论 TACE联合索拉非尼对原发性肝癌的疗效显著且安全,同时发现术前AFP400 ng/mL、肿瘤平均直径5 cm及术前中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值≥1.77是中晚期PLC患者治疗后影响预后效果的危险因素,因此在今后的临床工作中,应重点加强对高危患者的监控。     

索拉非尼联合放射治疗肝癌研究进展

索拉非尼是多靶点激酶抑制剂,通过抗增殖和抗血管形成作用抑制肿瘤细胞生长和血管形成,其作用机制是靶向抑制丝裂原活化蛋白激酶(Ras/Raf/MAPK)、血管内皮生长因子/血管内皮生长因子受体(VEGF/VEGFR)和核因子κB(NF-κB)等信号传导通路,而这些信号通路在放射时被激活,在肿瘤发生发展过程中起着重要的作用。研究显示,索拉非尼联合放射治疗原发性肝癌有协同效应,但联合方案的基础和临床研究有待进一步探索。     

索拉非尼联合三氧化二砷治疗肝癌的研究

目的探讨索拉非尼联合三氧化二砷(As2O3)对肝癌的治疗作用。方法采用MTT实验检测索拉非尼联合As2O3对肝癌细胞的毒性。流式细胞仪检测索拉非尼联合As2O3诱导肿瘤细胞凋亡。构建肝癌异位瘤模型,检测索拉非尼联合As2O3对肝癌荷瘤裸鼠生存期的影响。结果与生理盐水组和单独给药组相比,联合干预组对肝癌具有更强的细胞毒性,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。细胞凋亡实验结果表明,联合干预能够促进肿瘤干细胞凋亡,差异具有统计学意义(P0.01)。体内治疗实验结果显示,索拉非尼与As2O3联合干预能够显著延长荷瘤小鼠的中位生存期,诱导肿瘤细胞的凋亡。结论索拉非尼联合As2O3能够增强对肝癌HepG2细胞的增殖抑制作用,是一种潜在的肝癌有效治疗方法。     

TACE联合放疗治疗原发性肝癌的临床疗效

目的探讨经导管介入肝动脉关注化疗栓塞术(TACE)与放疗联合对原发性肝癌患者进行治疗的临床疗效。方法原发性肝癌患者70例,随机分为对照组35例,观察组35例,观察组行TACE联合三维适形放射治疗,对照组行单纯TACE治疗,对两组患者的生存质量和不良反应发生情况进行比较分析。结果治疗后,观察组近期疗效的总有效率显著高于对照组(P0.05);经治疗5个月后,观察组患者的Karnofsky评分明显优于对照组(P0.05);经治疗后,两组均有患者出现白细胞减少、胃肠道反应、肝功能受损情况,观察组不良反应发生率明显低于对照组(P0.05)。结论对原发性肝癌患者采取TACE与放疗联合治疗,效果显著,安全性高,可改善患者生存质量,值得临床进一步推广使用。     

索拉非尼联合国产PD-1抑制剂治疗不可手术切除的肝细胞癌的疗效及不良反应

目的研究索拉非尼联合国产程序性细胞死亡受体-1(programmed cell death receptor-1,PD-1)抑制剂在不可手术切除的肝细胞癌(hepatocellular carcinoma, HCC)中的疗效及不良反应。方法回顾性分析2019年6月至2021年1月于北京地坛医院肿瘤内科使用国产PD-1抑制剂联合索拉非尼治疗的不可手术切除的HCC患者的临床资料,资料完整且符合入组条件者共22例,其中卡瑞利珠单抗联合索拉非尼组9例,信迪利单抗联合索拉非尼组13例,随访患者,主要研究终点为统计客观缓解率(objective response rate, ORR)、疾病控制率(disease control rate, DCR)和无进展生存期(progression-free survival, PFS),次要研究终点为总生存期(overall survival, OS)和安全性。结果在可评价疗效的22例患者中,7例患者疗效评价为部分缓解(partial remission, PR),10例患者疗效评价为疾病稳定(stable disease, SD),5例患者疗效评价为疾病进展(progressive disease, PD),ORR为31.8%,DCR为77.3%。中位无进展生存期(median progression-free survival, mPFS)为8.0个月(5.4~10.6个月)。不良反应发生率为77.3%,最常见的不良反应为腹泻(27.3%)、手足综合征(22.7%)、转氨酶升高(22.7%)、疲乏(18.2%)。结论索拉非尼联合国产PD-1抑制剂治疗不可手术切除的HCC临床效果显著,不良反应可控,是一种安全、有效的治疗方案。     

索拉非尼治疗19例晚期原发性肝癌临床疗效观察

目的：观察索托非尼治疗19例晚期原发性肝癌患者的疗效及不良反应。方法19例无法手术切除的晚期原发性肝癌患者口服索拉非尼400 mg,2次/d,至出现不可耐受的不良反应或连续两次评价为疾病进展时停药,观察疗效和不良反应。结果在服药后3个月观察,获得 PR 1例（5.3%）,SD 10例（52.6%）,PD8例（42.1%）,42.9%（6/14）患者 AFP 明显降低,而50.0%（7/14）呈不同程度的增加;随访3～22（8.5）个月,16例（84.2％）患者死亡,3例（16％）患者仍继续服药,中位疾病进展时间（TTP）为5.1个月（1.5～15.0个月）,中位总生存期（OS）为6.5个月（3.0-22.0个月）;16例（84.2％）患者出现手足皮肤硬化、麻木,7例（36.8%）出现皮疹和脱发,10例（52.6%）血压升高,15例（78.9%）发生胃肠道不良反应,2例（10.5%）发生骨髓抑制,8例（42.1%）出现腹泻。结论索拉非尼治疗晚期原发性肝癌患者有一定的疗效,多数不良反应可以耐受,服药期间患者的生活质量保持稳定。     

TACE联合索拉非尼治疗肝癌合并门静脉癌栓的临床疗效及安全性

目的评价经皮导管动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)联合索拉非尼治疗原发性肝癌(HCC)伴门静脉癌栓(PVTT)的临床疗效及安全性。方法 2015年1月至2016年1月确诊为HCC合并PVTT患者60例,随机分为联合治疗组(n=30)和对照组(n=30)。联合治疗组采用TACE+索拉非尼治疗,对照组采用TACE治疗。用改良实体瘤疗效评价标准(mRECIST)评估疗效。随访观察总生存期(OS)、疾病进展时间(TTP)、疾病控制率(DCR)和毒副反应。结果治疗组DCR为60.0%,对照组DCR为36.7%,治疗组DCR和对照组DCR相比,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05),治疗组中位OS为10.3个月(95%CI:7.2～13.5),对照组患者OS为5.7个月(95%CI:4.5～6.8),治疗组DCR和对照组DCR相比,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);治疗组中位TTP为5.5个月(95%CI:4.6～6.7),对照组中位TTP为3.0个月(95%CI:2.1～3.7),治疗组DCR和对照组DCR相比,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。两组TACE相关不良反应差异无统计学意义,治疗组出现4例索拉非尼相关严重毒副反应,但未出现药物相关死亡患者。结论 TACE联合索拉非尼治疗HCC合并PVTT总体生存期及疾病控制率明显优于单纯TACE治疗,且安全性良好。     

索拉非尼联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗中晚期肝细胞癌疗效观察

目的观察经导管肝动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)与靶向治疗药相结合治疗中晚期肝细胞癌的疗效和安全性。方法 2008年1月至2012年12月我院收治的中晚期肝细胞癌患者60例,均采用TACE治疗,其中37例术后口服索拉非尼(400 mg,2次/d),根据不良反应调整用量,定期复查腹部CT。根据m RECIST标准进行疗效评价,观察患者的肿瘤进展时间和总生存期,并记录索拉非尼不良反应和TACE前后的肝功能变化。结果 37例应用TACE联合索拉非尼治疗患者的中位生存期为(13±0.98)m,显著长于23例单纯TACE治疗组[(7.3±1.20)m,P=0.001],肿瘤进展时间为(7.5±1.21)m,显著长于单纯TACE治疗组[(5±0.62)m,P=0.001];在随访结束时,联合治疗组疾病控制率为48.6%,显著高于单纯TACE组的17.4%(P0.01);多因素分析显示有无联合应用索拉非尼、有无门脉癌栓、是否抗病毒治疗是显著影响生存时间的风险因素;索拉非尼治疗主要的相关不良反应为手足皮肤反应。结论 TACE联合索拉非尼治疗可延长中晚期肝细胞癌患者的疾病进展时间及总生存期,安全性好。     

Complete response with sorafenib and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) showing portal vein tumor thrombosis(PVTT) have an extremely poor prognosis. According to treatment guidelines, the only option for HCC patients with PVTT is sorafenib chemotherapy. However, in Asia, various treatments have been attempted and possible prolongation of overall survival has been repeatedly reported. We herein report the first case of a patient with an initially unresectable advanced HCC with PVTT who underwent curative hepatectomy after sorafenib and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization(TACE) showing complete histological response. Two months after induction with sorafenib, a significant decrease in serum alpha-fetoprotein level was observed and computed tomography imaging showed a significant decrease in tumor size. Because of remaining PVTT, TACE and curative resection were performed. The combination of sorafenib and TACE may be an effective treatment for HCC patients with PVTT.     

肝动脉化疗栓塞联合射频消融治疗大肝癌的疗效评价

目的探讨经导管肝动脉化疗栓塞（transcatheter arterial chemoembolization,TACE）联合射频消融（radiofrequency ablation,RFA）治疗大肝癌的临床应用价值。方法回顾性分析我院2006年4月至2008年7月收治的66例肝细胞癌患者的治疗结果,根据治疗方法分为TACE＋RFA组、TACE组及RFA组,其中19例行RFA联合TACE治疗（TACE＋RFA组）,24例单纯TACE治疗（TACE组）,23例单纯RFA治疗（RFA组）。结果 TACE＋RFA组的肿瘤坏死率达73.68%,明显高于单纯TACE组及单纯RFA组（分别为50.00%,52.17%,P〈0.01,P〈0.05）。局部复发率分别为26.32%、37.50%和30.43%,三组间无显著统计学差异（P〉0.05）。TACE＋RFA组的平均生存期为28.3个月,显著高于TACE组的13.6个月（P〈0.01）和单纯RFA组的21.7个月（P〈0.05）。结论 TACE联合RFA治疗大肝癌与单纯TACE和单纯RFA治疗效果相比,可提高肿瘤坏死率,延长患者生存期。     

Adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: Propensity score analysis

AIM: To compare survival and recurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who did or did not receive adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).METHODS: A consecutive sample of 229 patients who underwent curative resection between March 2007 and March 2010 in our hospital was included. Of these 229 patients, 91 (39.7%) underwent curative resection followed by adjuvant TACE and 138 (60.3%) underwent curative resection alone. In order to minimize confounds due to baseline differences between the two patient groups, comparisons were conducted between propensity score-matched patients. Survival data and recurrence rates were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. Independent predictors of overall survival and recurrence were identified using Cox proportional hazard regression.RESULTS: Among 61 pairs of propensity score-matched patients, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival rates were 95.1%, 86.7%, and 76.4% in the TACE group and 86.9%, 78.5%, and 73.2% in the control group, respectively. At the same time, the TACE and control groups also showed similar recurrence rates at 1 year (13.4% vs 24.8%), 2 years (30.6% vs 32.1%), and 3 years (40.1% vs 34.0%). Multivariate Cox regression identified serum alpha-fetoprotein level ≥ 400 ng/mL and tumor size > 5 cm as independent risk factors of mortality (P < 0.05).CONCLUSION: As postoperative adjuvant TACE does not improve overall survival or reduce recurrence in HCC patients, further study is needed to clarify its clinical benefit.     

Adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization after radical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma patients with tumor size less than 5 cm: a retrospective study

Objective: Our aim is to retrospectively compare the disease-free survival (DFS) of adjuvant TACE after surgical resection on patients with tumor less than 5?cm.

Methods: A total of 307 patients with HCC underwent hepatic resection between January 2014 to December 2016 were enrolled in this study. Among these, 172 patients underwent surgical treatment only (group A) and 135 patients received surgical resection followed by adjuvant TACE (group B). Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis is used to minimize baseline differences between two groups. DFS was compared between the two groups and Cox proportional hazard model was used to predict the factor for recurrence.

Results: Before PSM, the 1, 2, 3 year DFS rate of group A and B were 90.1%, 83.3%, 75.3% versus 85.2%, 73.9%, 68.1%, respectively (p?=?.286). After PSM, the 1, 2, 3 year DFS rate of group A and group B were 90.3%, 80.8%, 71.9% versus 89.2%, 77.8%, 71.3%, respectively (p?=?.791). In subgroup analysis where patients presented with microvascular invasion (MiVI), before PSM the 1, 2, 3 year DFS rate were 77.8%, 77.8%, 77.8% and 70%, 70%, 47.3%, for group A and B, respectively (p?=?.491). After PSM the 1, 2, 3 year DFS rate for group A and B were 71.4%, 71.4%, 71.4% and 100%, 100%, 50%, respectively (p?=?.440). Cox proportional hazard model identified tumor size ≥3?cm as factor related to recurrence.

Conclusions: Adjuvant TACE does not improve the DFS of HCC patients with tumor size less than 5?cm.     

3D conformal radiotherapy combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma

AIM:To compare transcatheter arterial chemoembolization(TACE)and 3D conformal radiotherapy(3D-CRT)with TACE monotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).METHODS:We searched all the eligible studies from the Cochrane Library,Pub Med,Medline,Embase,and CNKI.The meta-analysis was performed to assess the survival benefit,tumor response,and the decline inα-fetoprotein(AFP)level.According to the heterogeneity of the studies,pooled OR with 95%CI were calculated using the fixed-effects or random-effects model.An observed OR>1 indicated that the addition of 3D-CRT to TACE offered survival benefits to patients that could be considered statistically significant.Statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager Software.RESULTS:Ten studies met the criteria to perform a meta-analysis including 908 HCC participants,with 400patients in the TACE/3D-CRT combination group and508 in the TACE alone group.TACE combined with 3DCRT significantly improved 1-,2-and 3-year overall survival compared with TACE monotherapy(OR=1.87,95%CI:1.37-2.55,P<0.0001),(OR=2.38,95%CI:1.78-3.17,P<0.00001)and(OR=2.97,95%CI:2.10-4.21,P<0.00001).In addition,TACE plus 3DCRT was associated with a higher tumor response(complete remission and partial remission)(OR=3.81;95%CI:2.70-5.37;P<0.00001),and decline rates of AFP level(OR=3.24,95%CI:2.09-5.02,P<0.00001).CONCLUSION:This meta-analysis demonstrated that TACE combined with 3D-CRT was better than TACE monotherapy for patients with HCC,which needs to be confirmed by large multicenter trials.     

Comparative effectiveness of traditional chemoembolization with or without sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma

AIM: To compare the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) with associated adverse events (AE) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) + sorafenib vs TACE alone. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study we collected data on all consecutive patients with a diagnosis of unresectable HCC between 2007 and 2011 who had been treated with TACE + sorafenib or TACE alone. We hypothesized that the combination therapy is superior to TACE alone in improving the survival in these patients. Data extracted included patient’s demographics, etiology of liver disease, histology of HCC, stage of liver disease with respect to model of end stage liverdisease score and Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) classification and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging for HCC. Computed tomography scan findings, alpha fetoprotein levels, number of treatments and related AE were also recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 43 patients who met inclusion criteria, 13 were treated with TACE + sorafenib and 30 with TACE alone. There was no significant difference in median survival: 20.6 mo (95%CI: 13.4-38.4) for the TACE + sorafenib and 18.3 mo (95%CI: 11.8-32.9) for the TACE alone (P = 0.72). There were also no statistically significant differences between groups in OS (HR = 0.82, 95%CI: 0.38-1.77; P = 0.61), PFS (HR = 0.93, 95%CI: 0.45-1.89; P = 0.83), and treatment-related toxicities (P = 0.554). CTP classification and BCLC staging for HCC were statistically significant (P = 0.001, P = 0.04 respectively) in predicting the survival in patients with HCC. The common AE observed were abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting and mild elevation of liver enzymes. CONCLUSION: Combination therapy with TACE + sorafenib is safe and equally effective as TACE alone in patients with unresectable HCC. CTP classification and BCLC staging were the significant predictors of survival. Future trials with large number of patients are needed to further validate this observation.     

Cost-effectiveness analysis of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with or without sorafenib for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and TACE in combination with sorafenib (TACE-sorafenib) have shown a significant survival benefit for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Adopting either as a first-line therapy carries major cost and resource implications. The objective of this study was to estimate the relative cost-effectiveness of TACE against TACE-sorafenib for unresectable HCC using a decision analytic model. METHODS: A Markov cohort model was developed to com-pare TACE and TACE-sorafenib. Transition probabilities and utilities were obtained from systematic literature reviews, and costs were obtained from West China Hospital, Sichuan Uni-versity, China. Survival benefits were reported in quality-ad-justed life-years (QALYs). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated. Sensitive analysis was performed by varying potentially modifiable parameters of the model. RESULTS: The base-case analysis showed that TACE cost $26951 and yielded survival of 0.71 QALYs, and TACE-sorafenib cost$44542 and yielded survival of 1.02 QALYs in the entire treat-ment. The ICER of TACE-sorafenib versus TACE was $56745 per QALY gained, which was above threshold for cost-effectiveness in China. Sensitivity analysis revealed that the major driver of ICER was the cost post TACE-sorafenib therapy with stable state. CONCLUSION: TACE is a more cost-effective strategy than TACE-sorafenib for the treatment of unresectable HCC.     

Balloon-occluded transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization(TACE) is widely accepted as a treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) in the intermediate stage according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer(BCLC) guidelines. Recently, balloon-occluded TACE(B-TACE) was developed in Japan. Despite the lack of a clear definition, B-TACE is generally defined as the infusion of emulsion of chemotherapeutic agents with lipiodol followed by gelatin particles under the occlusion of feeding arteries by a microballoon catheter, which leads to the dense lipiodol emulsion(LE) accumulation in HCC nodules. This phenomenon cannot be explained only by the prevention of proximal migration and leakage of embolization materials; it further involves causing local changes in the hemodynamics of the surrounding occlusion artery and targeted HCC nodules. Balloon-occluded arterial stump pressure plays an important role in the dense LE accumulation in targeted HCC nodules. Although randomized controlled trials comparing the therapeutic effect and the prognosis of B-TACE to those of the other TACE procedures, such as conventional-TACE and drug-eluting beads TACE, are still lacking, B-TACE is thought to be a promising treatment. The purpose of this review is to summarize the mechanism, therapeutic effect, indication, prognosis and complications of BTACE.     

经肝动脉化疗栓塞后联合索拉非尼治疗肝癌患者临床观察

目的探讨索拉非尼联合经肝动脉化疗栓塞术（TACE）治疗肝癌患者的效果。方法选取142例肝癌患者,其中57例接受TACE治疗,47例接受索拉非尼治疗,38例接受索拉非尼联合TACE治疗。在治疗后12 w,评估治疗效果、总生存期（OS）和疾病进展时间（TTP）。结果联合治疗组有效率为26.32%,显著高于TACE组的17.54%或索拉非尼组的19.15%（P<0.05）;联合治疗组疾病控制率为71.05%,显著高于TACE组的57.89%或索拉非尼组的53.19%（P<0.01）;联合治疗组患者OS为8.6 m,显著高于索拉非尼组的6.2 m或TACE组的7.3 m（P<0.05）;联合治疗组TTP为6.7 m,显著高于索拉非尼组的5.1m或TACE组的 5.6 m（P<0.01）。结论索拉非尼联合TACE治疗肝癌患者具有较好的临床效果。