A clinical, radiographic, and microbiologic comparison of Astra Tech and Brånemark single tooth implants

Background: The soft tissues around single tooth implants differ fundamentally from the gingiva around natural teeth. There are very limited data comparing soft tissues around different implant systems. Aim: To assess whether the design characteristics of dental implants, particularly the implant‐abutment junction, may affect the dimensions and health of the peri‐implant soft tissues and radiographic bone levels. Subjects and Method: Fifteen Astra Tech and 15 Brånemark single tooth implants that had been in function for a minimum of 2 years in 30 partially dentate subjects were examined for plaque accumulation, probing depth, and bleeding on probing and compared to contralateral healthy teeth. Standardized radiographs were taken to measure the most coronal bone to implant contact on the mesial and distal surfaces. In addition, samples of subgingival plaque were taken on paper points and examined by darkfield microscopy. Results: Significantly higher mean probing depths (p < .001) and higher mean percentage of spirochetes (p= .003) were found at implants compared to teeth. In this sample, the Brånemark implants had significantly higher probing depths than the Astra Tech implants (median and interquartile range: Astra Tech 2.7 mm [2–3], Brånemark 3.3 mm [3–3.7] p= .026) and the most coronal bone to implant contact was closer to the implant–abutment junction in the Astra Tech implants (Astra Tech 0.6 mm [0.2–0.9], Brånemark 1.6 mm [1.4–2.0]. p < .001). Conclusion: Although there were statistically significant differences between the two implant systems, the clinical differences were small and probably reflect differences in the biologic width in relation to the location and design of the implant‐abutment junction.     

A prospective 5-year study of fixed partial prostheses supported by implants with machined and TiO2-blasted surface

Purpose The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether there was a difference between machined and TiO₂‐blasted implants regarding survival rate and marginal bone loss during a 5‐year observation period. Materials and Methods A total of 133 implants (Astra Tech Dental Implants; Astra Tech AB, Mölndal, Sweden) were placed in 50 patients at 6 centers in 4 Scandinavian countries. Forty‐eight implants were installed in the maxilla and 85 implants in the mandible. A randomization and a stratification were done, so that each fixed partial prosthesis was supported by at least 1 machined and 1 TiO₂‐blasted implant. The implant‐supported fixed partial prostheses (ISFPP) were fabricated within 2 months after postoperative healing. A total of 52 ISFPP (17 maxillary, 35 mandibular) were inserted. The patients were clinically examined once a year for 5 years. At the annual follow‐up, biological as well as technical complications were recorded. Results Of the 133 implants placed, 3 were reported as failed after 5 years of follow‐up, resulting in an overall cumulative survival rate of 97.6%. The cumulative implant survival rates were 100% for the TiO₂‐blasted implants and 95.1% for the machined implants. No significant difference in survival was, however, found between the machined and TiO₂‐blasted implants after 5 years. The mean marginal bone loss in the maxilla was 0.21 ± 0.83 mm (SD) for the machined implants and 0.51 ± 1.11 mm (SD) for the TiO₂‐blasted implants during the 5‐year observation period. In the mandible, the mean marginal loss was 0.22 ± 1.13 mm for the machined implants and 0.52 ± 1.07 mm for the TiO₂‐blasted implants from baseline to the 5‐year examination. No significant difference in marginal bone loss between the 2 surface groups was found during the 5‐year observation period. Conclusions The present study shows good 5‐year results with small ISFPP in the mandible, as well as in the maxilla. No significant differences were found in failure rate and marginal bone loss around implants with a machined rather than a TiO₂‐blasted surface.     

Effects of Implant Design and Surface on Bone Regeneration and Implant Stability: An Experimental Study in the Dog Mandible

Background: Previous experimental studies have shown a higher degree of bone‐implant contact for surface‐enlarged implants compared with machined implants. Yet, there is insufficient evidence that such implants show higher stability and an increased survival rate. Purpose: The purpose of this investigation was to study the integration and stability of grit‐blasted implants with retention elements on the implant neck, with and without marginal bone defects, compared with machined implants without retention elements. Materials and Methods: After tooth extraction of the mandibular premolars in six dogs, two grit‐blasted, partly microthreaded Astra Tech implants and one standard Branemark implant were bilaterally placed in each dog. On one side, 3 ± 3 mm large buccal defects were created, to expose three to four implant threads. The contralateral side served as control, and no defects were made. The animals were sacrificed after 4 months of healing. Implant stability was measured using resonance frequency analysis at implant installation and after 4 months of healing. Histologic and histomorpho‐metric evaluation was made after 4 months of healing. Results: Resonance frequency analysis indicated that all implants in the test and control groups were osseointegrated after 4 months, with a tendency toward higher implant stability for the Astra Tech implants. There was a statistically significant higher increase in resonance frequency for the Astra test implants compared with their corresponding controls. Histology and histomorphometry showed well‐integrated implants with varying degrees of bone repair at the defect sites. The greater bone‐implant contact for the Astra implants was statistically significant. No significant difference between the implants in amount of bone filling the threads was recorded. Conclusions: The Astra Tech implants tested showed a higher degree of bone—implant contact and higher level of bone regenerated at defect sites compared with the Brånemark implants. Resonance frequency analysis demonstrated a significantly higher increase in the Astra test implants compared with their control groups than did the Brånemark test implants versus their controls.     

Astra Tech and Brånemark System implants: a prospective 5-year comparative study. Results after one year

Background: Endosseous dental implants are used frequently, and many implant systems are available. The scientific documentation of the implant system presents a great variation, and it is often difficult to compare studies of different systems. Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare two Swedish implant systems (Astra Tech and Brånemark System± implants), in a prospective randomized study. Materials and Methods: Sixty-six patients were equally distributed between the two implant systems; 184 Astra Tech and 187 Brånemark System implants were used. The patients have been followed annually with clinical and radiographic examinations. The results after 1 year are reported. Results: The abutment procedure was found to be easier and less time-consuming with Astra Tech than with Brånemark implants. The operation times in minutes (mean ± SEM) were for the respective implant 35 ± 4.0 and 51 ± 4.8 in the maxilla and 32 ± 3.8 and 43 ± 2.4 in the mandible. The differences in both cases were significant: p <.02 and p <.05, respectively. The failure rate for Astra Tech implants was 0.5% and for Brånemark implants 4.3%. The difference was significant (p <.05); however, taking into account that five of the eight implant losses in the Brånemark implant group occurred in one patient, an intraindividual correlation cannot be excluded. Therefore, this result should be interpreted with caution. The marginal bone level changes were examined already from the fixture installation. The major bone loss was found between fixture installation and baseline. This bone loss was several times greater than the bone loss between the baseline and the 1-year follow-up. The total bone loss during the observation period did not differ significantly between the systems, but they had different resorption patterns. The bone loss in the upper jaw between baseline and 1-year follow-up was 0.22 ± 0.14 and 0.03 ± 0.09 mm for the Astra Tech and Brånemark implants, respectively. In the lower jaw, the loss was -0.31 for both systems. The frequency of plaque accumulation and bleeding on probing did not differ between the implant systems. Conclusions: Abutment connection with Astra Tech implants was simpler than the corresponding surgery with Brånemark System implants and the survival rate of Astra Tech implants was higher than that of Brånemark system implants.     

Marginal Bone Level Changes at Dental Implants after 5 Years in Function: A Meta‐Analysis

Background: It is important that peri‐implant bone breakdown caused by, for example, undue load and/or peri‐implantitis, is prevented or minimized. Some continuous loss of marginal bone is generally accepted, but the question remains as to what extent it must occur. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compile and compare data on peri‐implant marginal bone level changes from prospective studies that have registered the peri‐implant marginal bone level radiographically at the time of prosthetic loading, and after 5 years of follow‐up for implant systems currently available on the market. Materials and Methods: A literature search was carried out to identify prospective studies on peri‐implant marginal bone level changes around dental implants. To be included in a meta‐analysis, the implant systems should have been subjected to at least two independent studies. Copycats without documentation were not accepted. Results: Forty prospective studies that presented with a 5‐year data were identified. Three implant systems met the inclusion criteria of having at least two independent studies; Astra Tech Dental Implant System® (Astra Tech AB, Mölndal, Sweden), Brånemark System (Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden), and Straumann Dental Implant System (Institute Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland). The pooled mean marginal bone level change amounted to ?0.24 mm (95% CI ?0.345, ?0.135) for the Astra Tech Dental Implant System, 0.75 mm (95% CI ?0.802, ?0.693) for the Brånemark System, and 0.48 mm (95% CI ?0.598, ?0.360) for the Straumann Dental Implant System over 5 years, with a statistically significant difference (p < .01) between the systems. Conclusions: The identified implant systems showed an annual bone loss below or much below what hitherto has been set up as a limit for success. A careful documentation of marginal bone level changes should be mandatory for all implant systems before being marketed. It is also time for revision of existing success criteria to refine the basis for clinical quality judgment of implant treatment.     

A 4‐ to 5‐Year Retrospective Clinical and Radiographic Study of Neoss Implants Placed with or without GBR Procedures

Background: New dental implant systems are continuously introduced to the market. It is important that clinicians report their experiences with these implants when used in different situations. Aim: The study aims to report the outcomes from a retrospective study on Neoss implants when used with or without guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedures. Materials and Methods: The study group comprised of 50 consecutive patients previously treated with 183 Neoss implants (Neoss Ltd., Harrogate, UK) in 53 sites because of single, partial, or total tooth loss. Implants were placed in healed bone in 23 sites, while a GBR procedure was used in 30 sites in conjunction with implant placement. A healing period of 3 to 6 months was utilized in 45 sites and in 8 sites a crown/bridge was fitted within a few days for immediate/early function. The number of failures, withdrawn and dropout implants was analyzed in a life‐table. All available intraoral radiographs from baseline and annual check‐ups were analyzed with regard to marginal bone level and bone loss. Results: A cumulative survival rate (CSR) of 98.2% was found for the non‐GBR group and 93.5% for the GBR group with an overall CSR of 95.0% after up to 5 years of loading. In spite of the failures, all patients received and maintained their prostheses. Based on all available radiographs, the bone level was situated 1.3 ± 0.8 mm (n = 159) below the top of the collar at baseline and 1.7 ± 0.8 mm (n = 60) after 5 years of follow‐up. Based on paired baseline and 1‐year (n = 70) and 5‐year radiographs (n = 59), the bone loss was found to be 0.4 ± 0.9 and 0.4 ± 0.9 mm, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between GBR and non‐GBR sites with regard to implant survival or bone loss. Conclusions: The Neoss implant system showed good clinical and radiographic results after up to 5 years in function.     

Marginal bone reaction to oral implants: a prospective comparative study of Astra Tech and Brånemark System implants

Abstract: In earlier studies of Astra Tech and Brånemark System implants, high survival rates and small marginal bone changes have been demonstrated. The aim of this study was to compare the two systems, primarily with regard to marginal bone changes, but also with regard to other clinical variables of interest. The present paper describes the results after three years. Sixty‐six patients were included in the study and randomly assigned to treatment with Astra Tech implants (n=184) or Brånemark System implants (n=187). The marginal bone level was radiographically examined at fixture insertion, at abutment connection, at baseline (delivery of the prosthetic construction) and at 1‐ and 3‐year follow‐up examinations. Between fixture insertion and the baseline examination, the pattern of marginal bone resorption differed between the two systems. However, there was no significant marginal bone change between baseline and the 1‐year examination or between the 1‐ and 3‐year examinations. Nor were there any differences between the systems. The mean bone loss in the upper jaw between BL (baseline) and 3 years was 0.2±0.3 mm for Astra Tech implants and 0.2±0.1 mm for Brånemark System implants. The corresponding figures for the lower jaw were 0.3±0.2 mm and 0.2±0.1 mm. The survival rate of Astra Tech implants was significantly higher (98.9%) than for Brånemark System implants (95.2%). However, five of the nine implant losses in the Brånemark group occurred in one patient. For that reason, this result must be interpreted with caution. The number of patients with implant losses did not differ significantly between the systems. Few complications were recorded up to 3 years.     

Astra Tech and Brånemark system implants: a 5-year prospective study of marginal bone reactions

Abstract: This paper describes the 5‐year results of a comparative study between Astra Tech and Brånemark system implants. The aim was to compare the systems primarily with regard to bone level changes, and also with regard to other variables of interest. Sixty‐six patients with edentulous jaws were included in the study. Randomisation schedules were used to allocate the patients to the two implant systems. 184 Astra Tech implants with a titanium‐blasted surface and 187 Brånemark implants with a turned surface were used. The implants were inserted with a two‐stage technique and the insertion followed the routines for the respective implant system. All patients were provided with full‐arch fixed bridges. All patients were followed up with clinical and radiographic examinations from fixture insertion to the 5‐year follow‐up. The total mean bone level change in the upper jaw between fixture insertion and the 5‐year examination was ?1.74±0.45 mm at the Astra implants and ?1.98±0.21 at the Brånemark implants. The corresponding values for the lower jaw were ?1.06±0.19 for Astra and ?1.38±0.17 for Brånemark. The major postoperative changes of the marginal bone level took place between fixture insertion and baseline. During this period, there was also a different pattern of bone remodelling between the implant systems. Between baseline (prosthesis connection) and the 5‐year examination, the marginal bone level changes were small, with no difference between the implant systems. The implant stability was examined with the supraconstructions removed. At the 5‐year examination, the survival rate for Astra Tech implants was 98.4% and for the Brånemark implants it was 94.6%. The difference was not statistically significant.     

Reliability of Circumferential Bone Level Assessment around Single Implants in Healed Ridges and Extraction Sockets Using Cone Beam CT

Purpose: Cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) provides three‐dimensional information and could absolutely be useful for evaluating circumferential implant bone levels. However, the accuracy and precision of the technique has not been described. The aim of the study was to assess the accuracy and precision of CBCT (i‐CAT®, Imaging Sciences International®, Hatfield, PA, USA) using periapical radiographs (PA) as a reference and to evaluate the circumferential bone level on CBCT around immediately loaded single implants placed in healed ridges (CIT, conventional implant treatment) and extraction sockets (IIT, immediate implant placement). Materials and Methods: PA and CBCT radiographs were obtained from 26 single Astra Tech Osseospeed? implants (Astra Tech AB, Mölndal, Sweden) 1 year after loading in respectively healed ridges (CIT) or extraction socket (IIT). For accuracy analysis, the three mesial and three distal interproximal levels obtained by CBCT were pooled to enable a comparison with PA. Precision was analyzed by intra‐ and interexaminer reliability calculation from mesial and distal sites on CBCT. The circumferential bone level considered all eight positions assessed on CBCT. Results: Accuracy of CBCT was low (R = 0.325/p = .019) given the fact that bone level of the total group was 0.70 mm (standard deviation [SD] 0.78, range 0.00–3.20) on PA and 0.23 mm (SD 0.27, 0.00–1.20) on CBCT (p < .001) with only 42% of the measurements showing deviation within 0.2 mm. However, intra‐ and interexaminer reliability were favorable (R ≥ 0.611/p < .001, ≥83%). The mean circumferential bone level on CBCT was 0.21 mm (SD 0.30) and 0.26 mm (SD 0.18) for IIT and CIT, respectively. The impact of the treatment strategy was not significant. Conclusion: PA should be the standard technique to assess interproximal bone level but correlates poorly with the CBCT measurements. However, the precision of CBCT was high. CBCT requires further improvements of hardware and/or software. Within the limitations of the study, there is an indication that the buccal bone 1 year after implant treatment is evenly preserved when implants are immediately loaded in extraction sockets or in healed bone.     

Early and immediate loading of titanium implants with fluoride-modified surfaces: results of 5-year prospective study

Objective: Multiple experimental and animal studies have shown that topographic, mechanical and chemical properties of implant surfaces lead to in vivo responses such as increased bone formation, increased bone anchorage and reduced healing time. A fluoride modification of the titanium implant surface also seems to positively influence bone anchorage as compared with unmodified titanium implants. Using implant survival and marginal bone loss as primary outcome parameters, the purpose of the present prospective study was to investigate whether a fluoride modification of the titanium implant surface has positive clinical effects. Materials and methods: The 17 patients included in this study received 49 Astra Tech OsseoSpeed^? implants for various indications in the maxilla and mandible. Implants were either loaded immediately or after a mean healing period of 9.56 weeks. Fifteen patients were followed up clinically including radiographic examination for 5 years. Forty‐two implants were assessed for implant survival, marginal bone loss, surgical and/or prosthetic complications, presence or absence of plaque, signs of inflammation and size of the papilla. Results: Of the original 17 patients, 15 patients were available for the full 60‐month follow‐up. One early implant failure occurred, leading to an implant survival rate of 97%. Radiographic analyses demonstrated stable bone conditions with a mean marginal bone loss of 0.1 mm (SD 0.4 mm, min ?0.7 mm, max 1.7 mm) after 5 years of function. Immediately loaded implants did not show a different mean marginal bone loss as compared with implants that were not loaded immediately. Repeated soft‐tissue examinations revealed healthy conditions in terms of 6.1% plaque and 4.2% of the implants with signs of inflammation at the 5‐year control. Discussion: Implants used in this study had high survival and success rates after 5 years. Marginal bone was well maintained, irrespective of the loading regime. To cite this article:
Mertens C, Steveling HG. Early and immediate loading of titanium implants with fluoride‐modified surfaces: results of 5‐year prospective study.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. xx , 2011; 000–000.     

Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes and Bone Loss around Titanium Implants with Oxidized Surface: Six‐Year Follow‐Up Results from a Prospective Case Series Study

Purpose: The aim of this prospective study was to assess long‐term clinical outcomes and peri‐implant bone level changes around oxidized implants supporting partial fixed rehabilitations. Materials and Methods: Twenty‐two partially edentulous patients were included in the study. A total of 33 fixed rehabilitations were placed, supported by 54 titanium implants with oxidized microtextured surface. Prostheses were delivered after 3 and 6 months of implant placement in the mandible and maxilla, respectively. Patients were scheduled for follow‐up at 6 and 12 months and then yearly. At each follow‐up, plaque level and bleeding scores were assessed and periapical radiographs were taken. The main outcomes were prosthesis success, implant survival, implant success, and marginal bone level change. Results: Three patients were excluded from the study because they did not attend the 1‐year follow‐up. Nineteen patients, accounting for 49 implants, were followed for at least 6 years after prosthesis delivery. The mean follow‐up duration was 81.8 months (range 75–96 months). One mandibular single‐tooth implant failed after 1 year in a smoker woman. Cumulative implant survival and success at 6 years were 98.0% and 95.9%, respectively. Prosthesis success was 96.7%. The mean peri‐implant bone loss at 6 years was 0.76 ± 0.47 mm. Not significantly (p = .75) greater bone loss was found in the maxilla (0.78 ± 0.14 mm, n = 19) as compared with the mandible (0.74 ± 0.59 mm, n = 30). In the maxilla, bone loss was significantly greater around implants supporting partial prostheses as compared with single‐tooth implants (p = .03). Full patient satisfaction was reported. Conclusion: Implants with oxidized microtextured surface may achieve excellent long‐term clinical outcomes in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism.     

Stability Evaluation of Implants Integrated in Grafted and Nongrafted Maxillary Bone: A Clinical Study from Implant Placement to Abutment Connection

Background: Clinical studies have shown a higher degree of implant failures in grafted bone compared with normal nongrafted maxillary bone. Additionally, a prolonged time for integration of titanium implants in grafted block bone has been shown by means of resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Purpose: The aim of this prospective study was to compare the stability of implants placed in particulate bone, onlay block bone, interpositional bone, and nongrafted maxillary bone during the early phase of osseointegration using RFA and implant failure. Material and Methods: Thirty‐five patients with edentulism in the maxilla were included in the study. In all, 260 Astra Tech TiOblast? implants (Astra Tech AB, Mölndal, Sweden) were installed. Twenty‐five of these patients had severe maxillary atrophy and were treated with iliac bone grafts 5 to 6 months prior to implant placement, 19 with lateral onlay block grafts on one side (group A, 38 implants) and particulate bone for lateral augmentation on the other (group B, 38 implants). These 19 patients also got bilateral sinus floor augmentation with particulate bone (group C, 76 implants). Six patients had an unfavorable sagittal relation between the jaws and underwent a LeFort I operation with interpositional bone blocks grafted to the nasal and sinus floors (group D, 48 implants). The remaining 10 patients could be treated with implants without bone augmentation and served as control (group E, 60 implants). RFA was performed at implant placement and abutment connection 6 months later and an implant stability quotient (ISQ) value was given for each implant. Results: Four implants (1.5%) were found mobile at abutment connection and removed (two in group A and two in group D). RFA showed a slight increase in stability from installation to abutment connection but the differences were not statistically significant in any of the groups (Wilcoxon signed rank test for comparison of paired data). Implants installed in group D had a significantly lower ISQ value at both measurements compared with the other groups (Wilcoxon Rank Sum test for comparisons of independent samples, p = .05). Conclusion: It is concluded that TiO₂‐blasted implants placed in nongrafted and grafted maxillary bone using a two‐staged protocol show similar stability during the early phase of osseointegration. Patients reconstructed with interpositional bone graft after a LeFort I osteotomy showed lower implant stability values than nongrafted patients and other grafting techniques.     

Longitudinal Changes in Tooth/Single‐Implant Relationship and Bone Topography: An 8‐Year Retrospective Analysis

Purpose: To evaluate longitudinal changes in tooth/implant relationship and bone topography at single implants with a microthreaded, conical marginal portion (Astra Tech ST® implants, Astra Tech AB, Mölndal, Sweden). Material and Methods: Thirty‐one subjects with single implant–supported restorations in the esthetic zone were included. Radiographs obtained at crown installation and 1, 5, and 8 years of follow‐up were analyzed with regard to changes in (1) bone level at the implant and adjacent teeth and (2) vertical position of adjacent teeth relative to the single implant. Results: The mean marginal bone loss amounted to 0.1 mm at both implants and adjacent teeth during the 8 years of follow‐up. Regression analysis failed to identify significant explanatory factors for observed variance in bone level change at the adjacent tooth surfaces. Vertical change in position of the teeth relative to the implants was more frequent and significantly greater in incisor compared with premolar tooth region but not associated with gender or age. Conclusions: The marginal bone level at teeth adjacent to single implants with a microthreaded conical marginal part was not influenced by horizontal and vertical tooth‐implant distances. Continuous eruption of adjacent teeth may result in infraocclusal positioning of a single‐implant restoration.     

Three-year evaluation of single-tooth implants restored 3 weeks after 1-stage surgery

PURPOSE: The possibility of expediting dental implant therapy by early or immediate loading protocols requires long-term clinical investigation. The aim of this prospective cohort trial was to determine the 3-year implant success rate and prosthesis complications associated with functional loading 3 weeks after 1-stage placement of Astra Tech single-tooth implants replacing maxillary anterior teeth. A secondary objective was to determine peri-implant tissue responses at these implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The peri-implant bone and mucosal conditions of 43 implants in 39 subjects were radiographically and clinically measured 3 years after implant placement. RESULTS: Of the 48 patients originally treated, 39 patients and 43 implants were examined at the 3-year time point. Three of 54 implants failed within the first year. No additional failures were recorded since the 12-month reporting period. Peri-implant bone levels were stable for the 3-year period following implant placement. The change in marginal bone levels after 3 years was 0.42 +/- 0.59 mm. Papilla growth was measured at 1 and 3 years (0.61 +/- 0.95 mm and 0.74 +/- 0.79 mm, respectively). The buccal peri-implant tissue dimensions at the gingival zenith also increased at 1 and 3 years (0.34 +/- 0.94 mm and 0.51 +/- 1.42 mm, respectively). No abutment screw loosening or fracture occurred. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Early loading of endosseous dental implants placed in healed ridges offers select benefits to clinicians and their patients.     

A retrospective analysis of early and delayed loading of full-arch mandibular prostheses using three different implant systems: clinical results with up to 5 years of loading

Background: Early loading of implant‐supported prostheses in the edentulous mandible is widely accepted, but do the clinical results replicate those of delayed loading? Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcome and patient satisfaction with early or delayed loading in patients treated with fixed prostheses, using three different implant systems. Materials and Methods: One hundred and nine consecutively treated patients received 490 implants supporting fixed prostheses; 82 patients with Brånemark System® implants (Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden), 16 with Astra Tech® implants (Astra Tech AB Dental Implant system, Mölndal, Sweden), and 11 with ITI® MonoType® implants (ITI Dental Implant System®, Institute Straumann AG, Waldenburg, Switzerland). Prostheses were placed within 2 to 3 weeks in 55 patients; 54 patients underwent a two‐stage procedure. Data were collected from patient records and radiographs; 83 patients attended a clinical examination and received a questionnaire. Results: All patients had fixed prostheses at follow‐up with a mean observation time of 3.5 years. Cumulative survival rates (CSRs) were 92.5% of prostheses and 94.4% of implants for early loading, and 98.0 and 97.9% for delayed loading. The mean radiographic bone loss after the first year was small, and at 5 years less than 0.2 mm for both groups. With early loading, significantly more prostheses (p < .05) needed adjustment or replacement. Conclusion: Statistically significantly more prostheses needed adjustment or replacement in the early group. The present study suggested lower CSRs for prostheses and implants in the early loading group after 5 years; the difference was not statistically significant. Larger study samples are needed to verify statistically small differences between treatment techniques.     

Biologic and mechanical stability of single-tooth implants: 4- to 7-year follow-up

Background: Single‐tooth implants have been reported to achieve a high level of surgical and prosthetic success. However, close inspection of the literature reveals a paucity of data on the follow‐up of single‐tooth implants in function for 5 years or more. Since unsplinted implants may be considered to be subject to greater functional stresses, there is a need to report on the long‐term biologic and mechanical integrity of such implant‐supported restorations. Purpose: To report on the long‐term follow‐up of single‐tooth implants, restored and in function for 4 to 7 years. Materials and Methods: Twenty‐seven Astra Tech single‐tooth implants were subject to a clinical audit to evaluate implant and prosthetic success as well as response of both hard and soft tissues over a 1‐ to 4‐year follow‐up. This current report presents data on the biologic and mechanical integrity of 23 of these single‐tooth implants, which have been in function for up to 7 years (mean, 63 mo). Data are provided with respect to implant survival, maintenance of marginal bone levels, soft‐tissue health, and the recording of any adverse events, including prosthetic complications. Results: Only 14 implants in 13 patients were available for review, with no failures for this group of implants. One patient from the original group, who was lost to follow‐up, was known to have suffered an implant failure. Furthermore, in accordance with established criteria, the remaining 13 implants that are not included in this report must at this time also be considered as potential failures. As such, the best‐case scenario would be a 95.6% success rate for the 23 implants included in this review and the worst‐case scenario would be a 60.8% success rate. Mean marginal bone loss measured 0.49 mm mesially and 0.76 mm distally, with a frequency of bone loss of 50%. Soft tissues were clinically healthy. There were few adverse events, with only one case of abutment screw loosening, detected at the 6‐year review. In addition, crown decementation was recorded three times in two patients. Conclusions: It can be concluded that the Astra Tech single‐tooth implant can achieve long‐term biologic and mechanical stability when used to restore single missing teeth, over the long‐term.     

Bone alterations at implant‐supported FDPs in relation to inter‐unit distances: a 5‐year radiographic study

Objectives: The aim of this 5‐year study was to longitudinally evaluate bone alterations around implants with a conical implant–abutment interface in relation to implant–tooth and inter–implant distances. Material and methods: The patient sample comprised 43 partially dentate patients with a total of 48 implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) supported by 130 Astra Tech^® implants. Following FDP placement (baseline), the patients were enrolled in an individually designed supportive care program. Radiographic examinations were performed at the time of FDP installation, 1 and 5 years of follow‐up. Variables regarding implant position and proximal bone topography at tooth/implant units (n=36) and implant/implant units (n=67) were assessed with the use of a software program after scanning of the radiographs. Results: At tooth/implant units, the mean 5‐year marginal bone loss at the tooth, the implant and the mid‐proximal bone crest was 0.1, 0.4 and 0.2 mm, respectively. The mean longitudinal bone loss at the implant/implant units was 0.5 mm at the implants and 0.3 mm mid‐proximally. Multilevel regression analysis revealed that at implant/implant units, the change in the bone‐to‐implant contact level was a significant predictor with regard to the 5‐year mid‐proximal bone‐level change, whereas the horizontal inter‐unit distance showed a borderline significance (P=0.052). At tooth/implant units, no statistically significant associations were identified. Conclusions: The results of this 5‐year study revealed differences between inter‐implant and tooth–implant proximal areas with regard to bone crest alterations and associated factors. To cite this article:
Chang M, Wennström JL. Bone alterations at implant‐supported FDPs in relation to inter‐unit distances: a 5‐year radiographic study.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 21 , 2010; 735–740.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2009.01893.x     

Sinus bone formation and implant survival after sinus membrane elevation and implant placement: a 1- to 6-year follow-up study

Objectives: To investigate the long‐term clinical and radiographic results of the maxillary sinus membrane elevation technique where implants were inserted in a void space created by the elevation of the sinus membrane without adding any graft material. Materials and methods: A total of 84 patients were subjected to 96 membrane elevation procedures and simultaneous placement of 239 implants. Changes of intra‐sinus and marginal bone height in relation to the implants were measured in intraoral radiographs taken at insertion, after 6 months of healing, after 6 months of loading and then annually. Computerized tomography was performed pre‐surgically and 6 months post‐surgically. Resonance Frequency Analyses measurements were performed at the time of implants placement, at abutment connection and after 6 months of loading. The implant follow‐up period ranged from a minimum of one to a maximum of 6 years after implants loading. Results: All implants were stable after 6 months of healing. A total of three implants were lost during the follow‐up period giving a survival rate of 98.7%. Radiography demonstrated on average 5.3±2.1 mm of intra‐sinus new bone formation after 6 months of healing. RFA measurements showed adequate primary stability (implant stability quotient 67.4±6.1) and small changes over time. Conclusion: Maxillary sinus membrane elevation and simultaneous placement of implants without the use of bone grafts or bone substitutes result in predictable bone formation with a high implant survival rate of 98.7% during a follow‐up period of up to 6 years. The intra‐sinus bone formation remained stable in the long‐term follow‐up. It is suggested that the secluded compartment allowed for bone formation according to the principle of guided tissue regeneration. The high implant survival rate of 98.7% indicated that the implants sufficiently supported the fixed bridges throughout the study period. This technique reduces the risks for morbidity related to harvesting of bone grafts and eliminates the costs of grafting materials. To cite this article:
Cricchio G, Sennerby L, Lundgren S. Sinus bone formation and implant survival after sinus membrane elevation and implant placement: a 1‐ to 6‐year follow‐up study.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22 , 2011; 1200–1212.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.02096.x     

Marginal Bone Level Changes and Prosthetic Maintenance of Mandibular Overdentures Supported by 2 Implants: A 5‐Year Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: Documentation of early loading of mandibular overdentures supported by different implant systems is scarce. Purpose: This study aimed to compare the biologic and prosthetic outcome of mandibular overdentures supported by unsplinted early‐loaded one‐ and two‐stage oral implants after 5 years of function. Materials and Methods: Twenty‐eight consecutive patients were screened following an inclusion and exclusion criteria, and randomly allocated to treatment groups. Ball‐retained mandibular overdentures were fabricated on two unsplinted Straumann® (Institut Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland) and Brånemark® (Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden) dental implants and subjected to an early‐loading protocol. During the 5‐year period, prosthetic complications were recorded. At 5‐years of function, plaque, peri‐implant inflammation, bleeding, and calculus index scores were recorded, and standard periapical radiographs were obtained from each implant for measurement of marginal bone loss. Results: All implants survived during the observation period. The peri‐implant inflammation, bleeding, and calculus index scores around Straumann and Brånemark implants were similar (p > .05). The marginal bone loss around Brånemark implants (1.21 ± 0.1) was higher than Straumann implants (0.73 ± 0.06) at 5 years of function (p = .002). Kaplan–Meier tests revealed that 1‐ and 5‐year survival of overdentures on Straumann and Brånemark implants were similar (p = .85). Wear of the ball abutment in the Brånemark group was higher than in the Straumann group (p < .05). Complications regarding the retainer and the need for occlusal adjustments were higher in the Straumann group (p < .05). Chi‐square test revealed that the frequency of retightening of the retainer was higher in the Straumann group than in the Brånemark group (p < .05). Conclusions: Mandibular overdentures supported by unsplinted early‐loaded Straumann and Brånemark implants lead to similar peri‐implant soft tissue and prosthetic outcomes, although higher marginal bone loss could be observed around Brånemark implants after 5 years.     

Impact of Platform Switching on Peri‐Implant Bone Remodeling around Short Implants in the Posterior Region, 1‐Year Results from a Split‐Mouth Clinical Trial

Aim: To assess the effect of platform switching on peri‐implant bone remodeling around short implants (8.5 mm) placed in the resorbed posterior mandibular and maxillary region of partially edentulous patients. Materials and Methods: Seventeen patients with one or more missing teeth at both sides in the posterior region were, according to a split‐mouth design, randomly assigned to be treated with a platform‐matched (control) implant on the one side and a platform‐switched implant (test) on the other side. A total of 62 short implants (8.5 mm) with a dual‐acid etched surface with nanometer‐sized calcium phosphate particles was placed. Follow‐up visits were conducted one month and one year after placing the implant crown. Outcome measures were interproximal bone level changes, implant survival and clinical parameters. Results: One year after loading, peri‐implant bone remodeling around test implants (0.53 ± 0.54 mm) was significant less than around control implants (0.85 ± 0.65 mm; p = .003). With regard to implant survival and clinical parameters no significant differences were observed between test and control implants. Conclusions: This study suggested that peri‐implant bone remodeling is affected by platform switching. One year after loading, interproximal bone levels were better maintained at implants restored according to the platform switching concept.