A comparative evaluation of properties and clinical efficacy of the echinocandins

With the increase in prevalence of fungal infections, newer antifungal agents are needed to effectively treat invasive disease, and at the same time minimize adverse effects from therapy. The echinocandins comprise a novel class of antifungals; their mechanism of action involves inhibiting 1,3-β-D-glucan synthase, which is essential in cell wall synthesis for certain fungi. All three echinocandins are US FDA-approved for the treatment of esophageal candidiasis. Caspofungin and anidulafungin are licensed for the treatment of candidemia, and other select forms of invasive candidiasis. Micafungin is at present the only echinocandin approved for prophylaxis of fungal infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplants; whereas caspofungin is approved for empiric therapy of febrile neutropenia. Although all three echinocandins are active against Aspergillus, only caspofungin is presently approved for salvage therapy in invasive aspergillosis. Combination therapy with echinocandins plus other licensed antifungal therapy shows promise in treating invasive aspergillosis. This article will explore the similarities and differences among the echinocandins.     

A comparative evaluation of properties and clinical efficacy of the echinocandins

With the increase in prevalence of fungal infections, newer antifungal agents are needed to effectively treat invasive disease, and at the same time minimize adverse effects from therapy. The echinocandins comprise a novel class of antifungals; their mechanism of action involves inhibiting 1,3-beta-D-glucan synthase, which is essential in cell wall synthesis for certain fungi. All three echinocandins are US FDA-approved for the treatment of esophageal candidiasis. Caspofungin and anidulafungin are licensed for the treatment of candidemia, and other select forms of invasive candidiasis. Micafungin is at present the only echinocandin approved for prophylaxis of fungal infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplants; whereas caspofungin is approved for empiric therapy of febrile neutropenia. Although all three echinocandins are active against Aspergillus, only caspofungin is presently approved for salvage therapy in invasive aspergillosis. Combination therapy with echinocandins plus other licensed antifungal therapy shows promise in treating invasive aspergillosis. This article will explore the similarities and differences among the echinocandins.     

The echinocandins: comparison of their pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and clinical applications

Caspofungin, micafungin and anidulafungin are three drugs of the echinocandin class of antifungals available for intravenous treatment of invasive candidiasis and aspergillosis. They exhibit high in vitro and in vivo activities against Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp. In various clinical studies investigating candidemia and invasive candidiasis, Candida esophagitis, and fever in neutropenia, the clinical efficacy of the echinocandin tested was similar to that of established antifungals. Antifungal activity against strains no longer susceptible to conventional antifungal agents, such as fluconazole and amphotericin B suggests that echinocandins can be used as salvage therapy in life-threatening fungal infections. There is no cross-resistance to other antifungals. Excellent safety and tolerability of treatment with caspofungin has been documented over a total of 4.3 million patient days. Echinocandins are poor substrates of the cytochrome P450 enzyme family and can be safely co-administered with most drugs without the need for dosage adaptation. No dose reduction is required in renal impairment. A reduction in the daily maintenance dose has been recommended for caspofungin, but not for micafungin and anidulafungin in patients presenting with mild to moderate hepatic failure.     

Anidulafungin: a new echinocandin for the treatment of fungal infections

Immunocompromised hosts are at increased risk for invasive fungal infections. Over the last five decades, the mainstay of therapy against systemic mycoses has revolved around amphotericin B deoxycholate. Unfortunately, this drug has substantial toxicities, and agents such as fluconazole were developed as an alternative to treat and prevent these invasive infections. Due to widespread use, fluconazole-resistant organisms have emerged; therefore, new agents with improved safety, efficacy and tolerability have now become desirable. The echinocandins are a new class of antifungal agents with novel activity against the fungal cell wall. In February 2006, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the echinocandin anidulafungin for the treatment of patients with candidemia, peritonitis, intra-abdominal abscesses and esophageal candidiasis.     

symbol: see text]Caspofungin and [symbol: see text]voriconazole for fungal infections

Systemic fungal infections are difficult to treat and often fatal. Established treatment options include conventional amphotericin B or one of its lipid-based or liposomal formulations, or a triazole antifungal such as fluconazole or itraconazole. [symbol: see text]Caspofungin (Cancidas--Merck Sharp & Dohme) and [symbol: see text]voriconazole (Vfend--Pfizer) are two new antifungals for severe infections caused by Candida spp. (invasive candidiasis) and Aspergillus spp. (invasive aspergillosis). Caspofungin is the first licensed echinocandin antifungal, while voriconazole is a triazole. Promotional claims for caspofungin include that it "provides an effective, yet less toxic, alternative to amphotericin B" while voriconazole is claimed to offer "significantly improved survival in invasive aspergillosis compared with amphotericin B". Here we consider the place of caspofungin and voriconazole in managing patients with severe fungal infections.     

Anidulafungin: an evidence-based review of its use in invasive fungal infections

Introduction:

Anidulafungin is a new echinocandin antifungal agent with indications for use in esophageal candidiasis and candidemia. The mortality and morbidity associated with fungal infections in healthcare facilities necessitates the development of new treatment options for these diseases.

Aims:

This review assesses the pharmacology and evidence for the use of anidulafungin in the treatment of serious fungal infections.

Evidence review:

There is substantial evidence that anidulafungin is a potent antifungal agent with activity against a broad range of fungal species. Likewise, evidence supports that anidulafungin is a well-tolerated antifungal agent. Clinical studies provide sufficient evidence for regulatory approval for esophageal candidiasis and candidemia, and limited evidence suggests that anidulafungin may be superior to fluconazole for candidemia and invasive candidiasis. The introduction of anidulafungin into clinical practice adds a third option for therapy in the echinocandin class. Research into its efficacy in other fungal infections is ongoing, and further studies into the impact of anidulafungin on economic outcomes will be beneficial.

Place in therapy:

Current evidence supports the use of anidulafungin in the management of candidemia, esophageal candidiasis, and invasive candidiasis, as demonstrated by the successful results in large multicenter clinical trials.     

Antifungal combination therapy: clinical potential

Combination antifungal therapy has been an area of research and clinical interest since systemic antifungals became available decades ago. In vitro and clinical data were generated for some of the more common invasive fungal infections, especially candidiasis, but until very recently few clinical studies were performed. The first invasive fungal infection to be examined in clinical trials with adequate statistical power was cryptococcal meningitis and several of these trials stand out as classical studies in the clinical evaluation of combination antifungal therapy. More recently, since the availability of the newer antifungal agents, including the echinocandins and extended-spectrum triazoles, there has been a growing interest in examining combination antifungal therapy for invasive fungal disease, especially invasive aspergillosis. This is by no means a comprehensive review of all existing experimental data. Instead, the focus is on the clinical data that have been generated to date and on providing insights into potential future clinical directions. For instance, recent clinical data for cryptococcosis confirm that amphotericin B plus flucytosine is the most active combination for patients with cryptococcal meningitis. A recently completed clinical trial in candidaemia suggests a trend towards improved outcomes among patients receiving amphotericin B plus fluconazole versus fluconazole alone. In aspergillosis, several experimental models suggest benefit of a variety of antifungal combinations, but have not been confirmed in prospective clinical trials. Ultimately, the goal is to provide the reader with a comprehensive but useful review to this complicated and often confusing therapeutic dilemma.     

Caspofungin: a review of its use in oesophageal candidiasis, invasive candidiasis and invasive aspergillosis

Echinocandins are a new class of antifungal agents with a novel mechanism of action (interference with fungal cell wall synthesis). Caspofungin (Cancidas), Caspofungin MSD) is the first echinocandin to be approved and is administered intravenously.Caspofungin 50 mg/day had similar efficacy to intravenous fluconazole 200 mg/day and was at least as effective as intravenous amphotericin B 0.5 mg/kg/day in patients with oesophageal candidiasis in two randomised, double-blind studies. A favourable combined clinical and endoscopic response occurred in 81% of caspofungin recipients versus 85% of fluconazole recipients and in 74% of caspofungin recipients versus 63% of amphotericin B recipients. A favourable combined response rate of approximate, equals 90% and approximate, equals 60% occurred in the stratum of patients with oesophageal candidiasis who received caspofungin or amphotericin B in a third randomised, double-blind study.Caspofungin (70 mg loading dose followed by 50 mg/day) had similar efficacy to intravenous amphotericin B (0.7-1.0 mg/kg/day in patients with neutropenia and 0.6-0.7 mg/kg/day in patients without neutropenia) in patients with invasive candidiasis in a double-blind, randomised trial. A favourable overall response occurred in 73.4% of caspofungin recipients and in 61.7% of amphotericin B recipients.In a noncomparative study, salvage therapy with caspofungin (70 mg loading dose followed by 50 mg/day) was effective in patients with invasive aspergillosis who were refractory to or did not tolerate standard antifungal therapy. A favourable response (complete plus partial response) occurred in 37 of 83 patients (45%).Caspofungin was generally well tolerated in clinical trials; it had similar tolerability to intravenous fluconazole and was better tolerated than intravenous amphotericin B. Significantly fewer caspofungin than amphotericin B recipients reported chills, fever, nausea or infusion-related adverse events. In conclusion, caspofungin is a valuable new antifungal agent with a novel mechanism of action. In comparative trials, caspofungin had similar efficacy to fluconazole and was at least as effective as amphotericin B in oesophageal candidiasis and had similar efficacy to amphotericin B in invasive candidiasis. In addition, caspofungin had similar tolerability to fluconazole and was better tolerated than amphotericin B in these indications. Caspofungin was also effective in patients with invasive aspergillosis who were refractory to or intolerant of standard antifungal agents. Thus, caspofungin provides an alternative to triazoles or amphotericin B in oesophageal candidiasis and an alternative to amphotericin B in invasive candidiasis, as well as being an effective salvage therapy in invasive aspergillosis.     

Anidulafungin: an evidence-based review of its use in invasive fungal infections

INTRODUCTION: Anidulafungin is a new echinocandin antifungal agent with indications for use in esophageal candidiasis and candidemia. The mortality and morbidity associated with fungal infections in healthcare facilities necessitates the development of new treatment options for these diseases. AIMS: This review assesses the pharmacology and evidence for the use of anidulafungin in the treatment of serious fungal infections. EVIDENCE REVIEW: There is substantial evidence that anidulafungin is a potent antifungal agent with activity against a broad range of fungal species. Likewise, evidence supports that anidulafungin is a well-tolerated antifungal agent. Clinical studies provide sufficient evidence for regulatory approval for esophageal candidiasis and candidemia, and limited evidence suggests that anidulafungin may be superior to fluconazole for candidemia and invasive candidiasis. The introduction of anidulafungin into clinical practice adds a third option for therapy in the echinocandin class. Research into its efficacy in other fungal infections is ongoing, and further studies into the impact of anidulafungin on economic outcomes will be beneficial. PLACE IN THERAPY: Current evidence supports the use of anidulafungin in the management of candidemia, esophageal candidiasis, and invasive candidiasis, as demonstrated by the successful results in large multicenter clinical trials.     

Antifungal agents in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Invasive fungal infections are major complications of stem cell transplantation associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients are at a significantly greater risk for fungal infection than recipients of autologous transplantation. Although with the wide use of fluconazole prophylaxis the incidence and associated mortality of invasive candidiasis has been minimized, mold diseases remain a significant complication during periods of prolonged immunosuppression for graft versus host disease. Posaconazole prophylaxis during periods of high risk was recently demonstrated to be effective in preventing fungal infections and associated mortality. Preemptive strategy employing laboratory markers and serial CT scans to identify mold infection at an early stage is promising. However its efficacy has to be validated in clinical trials. Several new antifungal agents have been introduced lately, characterized by improved safety profile and broader antifungal spectrum. Voriconazole has become the standard of care for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis. Finally there has been increasing interest on combination therapy for invasive aspergillosis due to the high rate of failure of the currently available antifungals, especially in the profoundly immunocompromised host.     

Caspofungin: a review of its use in the treatment of fungal infections

Caspofungin (Cancidas) is the first of a new class of antifungal agents, the echinocandins, that inhibit the synthesis of the fungal cell wall component beta-(1,3)-D-glucan. Caspofungin is administered once daily by slow intravenous infusion and is used to treat infections caused by Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp.Caspofungin is a valuable new antifungal agent with a novel mechanism of action. In comparative clinical trials, caspofungin was no less effective than liposomal amphotericin B in the empirical treatment of neutropenic patients with persistent fever, amphotericin B deoxycholate in the treatment of invasive candidiasis or fluconazole in the treatment of oesophageal candidiasis. Caspofungin also displayed broadly similar efficacy to amphotericin B deoxycholate in oesophageal or oropharyngeal candidiasis and was effective as salvage therapy in patients with invasive aspergillosis who were refractory to or intolerant of standard therapy. The tolerability profile of caspofungin was similar to that of fluconazole and superior to that of amphotericin B deoxycholate and liposomal amphotericin B. Therefore, in the appropriate indications, caspofungin is a viable alternative to amphotericin B deoxycholate, liposomal amphotericin B or fluconazole.     

Candidemia in children

Abstract

Seriously ill or immunocompromised children are at increased risk of invasive fungal infections, particularly candidemia. Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis are the two most frequent causes of candidemia in pediatric patients. Candidemia in children is associated with high morbidity and mortality, increased length of hospital stays, and higher healthcare costs. Early effective antifungal therapy is the key to improved outcomes. Risk factors for candidemia may be used to identify patients suitable for empiric therapy. Such risk factors include prolonged stay in an intensive care unit, immunosuppression, prior bacterial infection, and recent surgery, as well as the use of a central venous catheter, mechanical ventilation, and/or total parenteral nutrition. Recent guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America recommend consideration of fluconazole or an echinocandin for empiric therapy in suitable candidates, with a preference for an echinocandin in patients with moderate-to-severe disease, recent azole exposure, or high risk of Candida glabrata or Candida krusei infection. Fluconazole or an echinocandin is also preferred initial therapy for non-neutropenic candidemia, depending on disease severity and other characteristics. The guidelines recommend treatment with an echinocandin or lipid formulation of amphotericin B for most patients with neutropenic candidemia, although fluconazole is identified as an alternative for less critically ill patients without recent azole exposure. Risk factors for candidemia – and, hence, criteria for prophylaxis – are less well established in older children than in neonates. Further research is needed to better establish criteria for antifungal prophylaxis in children at high risk for candidemia.     

Caspofungin: pharmacology,safety and therapeutic potential in superficial and invasive fungal infections

Invasive fungal infections are important causes of morbidity and mortality in hospitalised patients. Current therapy with amphotericin B and antifungal triazoles has overlapping targets and is limited by toxicity and resistance. The echinocandin lipopeptide caspofungin is the first of a new class of antifungal compounds that inhibit the synthesis of 1,3-β-D-glucan. This homopolysaccharide is a major component of the cell wall of many pathogenic fungi and yet is absent in mammalian cells. It provides osmotic stability and is important for cell growth and cell division. In vitro, caspofungin has broad-spectrum antifungal activity against Candida and Aspergillus spp. without cross-resistance to existing agents. The compound exerts prolonged post-antifungal effects and fungicidal activity against Candida spp. and causes severe damage of Aspergillus fumigatus at the sites of hyphal growth. Animal models have demonstrated efficacy against disseminated candidiasis and disseminated and pulmonary aspergillosis, both in normal and in immunocompromised animals. Caspofungin possesses favourable pharmacokinetic properties and is not metabolised through the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme system. It showed highly promising antifungal efficacy in Phase II and III clinical trials in immunocompromised patients with oesophageal candidiasis. Caspofungin was effective in patients with invasive aspergillosis intolerant or refractory to standard therapies. Based on its documented antifungal efficacy and an excellent safety profile, caspofungin has been approved recently by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis in patients who are refractory to or intolerant of other therapies (i.e., amphotericin B, lipid formulations of amphotericin B, and/or itraconazole). Phase III clinical trials in patients with candidaemia and in persistently febrile neutropenic patients requiring empirical antifungal therapy are ongoing. This paper reviews the preclinical and clinical pharmacology of caspofungin and its potential role for treatment of invasive and superficial fungal infections in patients.     

The Fluconazole Era: Management of Hematogenously Disseminated Candidiasis in the Nonneutropenic Patient

Hematogenously disseminated candidiasis arising from nosocomial fungal infection is a life-threatening complication in critically ill, nonneutropenic patients. The overall nosocomial fungal infection rate in United States hospitals doubled from 1980–1990. Until recently, amphotericin B was the only agent available for the treatment of life-threatening candidal infections, but its use is plagued by toxicities including nephrotoxicity and infusion-related reactions such as rigors and hypotension. The availability of fluconazole, which is regarded as much less toxic than amphotericin B, prompted a surge in research to determine if it is as efficacious in the management of candidemia and hematogenously disseminated candidiasis. Complicating the interpretation of studies is the broad range of infection severity, from candidemia that may be transient and self-limiting to life-threatening hematogenously disseminated candidiasis. Clinical trials comparing fluconazole and amphotericin B demonstrate the efficacy of fluconazole for catheter-associated candidemia in critically ill patients when the likely pathogen is Candida albicans. Amphotericin B should remain the first-line agent for the management of candidemia and hematogenously disseminated candidiasis in all other patients.     

Recent advances in antifungal chemotherapy

For over 50 years, amphotericin B deoxycholate (AmBD) has been the 'gold standard' in antifungal chemotherapy, despite its frequent toxicities. However, improved treatment options for invasive fungal infections (IFIs) have been developed during the last 15 years. Newer antifungal agents, including less toxic lipid preparations of AmBD, triazoles and the echinocandins, have been added to our armamentarium against IFIs. Some of these newer drugs can now replace AmBD as primary therapy (e.g. caspofungin for candidiasis, voriconazole for aspergillosis), whilst others offer new therapeutic options for difficult-to-treat IFIs (e.g. posaconazole for zygomycosis, fusariosis and chromoblastomycosis). It is interesting that extended use of newer antifungals such as fluconazole, despite decreasing the mortality attributed to candidiasis, resulted in selection of species resistant to several antifungals (Candida krusei, Candida glabrata); whilst several publications suggest that prolonged use of voriconazole may expose severely immunocompromised patients to the risk of zygomycosis (breakthrough). On the other hand, the differences in the mode of action of newer antifungals such as echinocandins raise the question whether combination antifungal therapy is more effective than monotherapy. Finally, the availability of an oral formulation with excellent biosafety of several newer antifungals (e.g. posaconazole) makes them candidates for prophylactic or prolonged maintenance therapy.     

Management of systemic candidal infections in the intensive care unit.

Risk factors and treatment strategies for systemic candidal infections in the intensive care unit (ICU) are discussed. The past two decades have seen a dramatic increase in the frequency of infections caused by Candida species. Risk factors associated with candidemia include treatment with multiple antimicrobials for extended periods, presence of central venous catheters, total parenteral nutrition, colonization by Candida species, abdominal surgery, prolonged stay in the ICU, and compromised immune status. Since the 1960s, conventional amphotericin B has been the primary treatment option for fungal infections. Although effective, amphotericin B has extensive toxicity. Three lipid-based formulations of amphotericin B have been developed in an attempt to decrease nephrotoxicity and improve drug delivery. Practitioners have also been offered alternatives by the introduction of less toxic azole antifungals, such as ketoconazole, fluconazole, and itraconazole; however, their widespread use has resulted in other problems, such as the selection of resistant isolates. There is controversy concerning fluconazole's effectiveness. In the treatment of systemic candidal infections, especially in critically ill patients. Clinical trials do not support the prophylactic or empirical use of fluconazole in the ICU. Treating patients who have no microbiological evidence of infection provides no therapeutic benefit and shifts the fungal flora to noncandidal strains that are more resistant to fluconazole. Patients in ICUs are often susceptible to systemic candidal infection. Preemptive therapy with fluconazole may reduce mortality in high-risk patients. Fluconazole and amphotericin B appear equally effective in treating established systemic candidal infections.     

Echinocandins: role in antifungal therapy, 2005

Novel therapies to treat invasive fungal infections have revolutionised the care of patients with candidiasis, aspergillosis and other less common fungal infections. Physicians in the twenty first century have access to safer versions of conventional drugs (i.e., lipid amphotericin B products), extended-spectrum versions of established drugs (i.e., voriconazole), as well as a new class of antifungal agents; the echinocandins. The increased number of options in the antifungal armamentarium is well timed, as the incidence of both invasive candidiasis and invasive aspergillosis, and the financial burden associated with these infections, have increased significantly in the past several decades. The increasing incidence of fungal infections has risen in parallel with the increase in critically ill and immunocompromised patients. Candida is the fourth most common bloodstream isolate, approximately 50% of which are non-albicans species. Estimates suggest there to be 9.8 episodes of invasive candidiasis per 1000 admissions to surgical intensive care units, with attributable mortality at 30% and cost per episode of US44,000 dollars. The burden of candidiasis is even higher in the paediatric population, with Candida being the second most common bloodstream infection. The increase in non-albicans candidiasis mandates the introduction of new antifungal agents capable of treating these often azole-resistant isolates. In addition, there has been a rise in the incidence of invasive aspergillosis, the most common invasive mould infection following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, with an estimated incidence of 10 - 20%. The mortality associated with invasive aspergillosis has increased by 357% since 1980. Unfortunately, the overall survival rate among patients treated with amphotericin B, and even voriconazole, remains suboptimal, as evidenced by the failure of treatment in 47% of patients in the landmark voriconazole versus amphotericin B trial. Given the increasing incidence and suboptimal outcomes of these serious fungal infections, novel therapies represent an opportunity for significant advancement in clinical care. The current challenge is to discover the optimal place for the echinocandins in the treatment of invasive fungal infections.     

Fungal infections in patients with neutropenia: challenges in prophylaxis and treatment

Fungal infections are a leading cause of mortality in patients with neutropenia. Candidiasis and aspergillosis account for most invasive fungal infections. General prophylactic measures include strict hygiene and environmental measures. Haemopoietic growth factors shorten the duration of neutropenia and thus may reduce the incidence of fungal infections. Fluconazole is appropriate for antifungal prophylaxis and should be offered to patients with prolonged neutropenia, such as high-risk patients with leukaemia undergoing remission induction or consolidation therapy and high-risk stem cell transplant recipients. Empirical antifungal therapy is mandatory in patients with persistent febrile neutropenia who fail to respond to broad-spectrum antibacterials. Intravenous amphotericin B at a daily dose of 0.6 to 1 mg/kg is preferred whenever aspergillosis cannot be ruled out. Lipid formulations of amphotericin B have demonstrated similar efficacy and are much better tolerated. Fluconazole is the best choice for acute candidiasis in stable patients; amphotericin B should be used in patients with unstable disease. Use of fluconazole is restricted by the existence of resistant strains (Candida krusei and, to a lesser extent, C. glabrata). Amphotericin B still remains the gold standard for invasive aspergillosis. Lipid formulations of amphotericin B are effective in aspergillosis and because they are less nephrotoxic are indicated in patients with poor renal function. Itraconazole is an alternative in patients who have good intestinal function and are able to eat. Mucormycosis, trichosporonosis, fusariosis and cryptococcosis are less common but require specific management. New antifungal agents, especially new azoles, are under development. Their broad in vitro spectrum and preliminary clinical results are promising.     

Emerging echinocandins for treatment of invasive fungal infections

The echinocandins are a new class of antifungals, developed in response to the need for safe and effective antifungals for the treatment of invasive fungal infections. These agents work by inhibiting 1,3-β-d-glucan synthase, an enzyme essential for production of cell walls in select fungi. Echinocandins appear to demonstrate favourable activity in vitro against a variety of yeasts (including both Candida albicans and non-albicans Candida) as well as select moulds (including Aspergillus spp.) In general, all echninocandins demonstrate a favourable safety profile and require once-daily parenteral administration. Caspofungin is the first of these agents to be available in the US, and is approved for empirical antifungal therapy in febrile neutropenic patients, candidaemia and select forms of invasive candidiasis, and for management of invasive aspergillosis in patients refractory to or intolerant of other therapies. Micafungin was recently approved by the FDA for treatment of oesophageal candidiasis, and for the prophylaxis of fungal infections in haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Emerging data indicate micafungin may have an important role in the treatment of invasive forms of candidiasis. Anidulafungin is an echinocandin approved in the US for treatment of candidaemia and oesophageal candidiasis. Aminocandin (HMR-3702, IP-960) is an investigational agent, with published experience limited to in vitro studies and animal models of infection.     

Posaconazole: a new broad-spectrum antifungal agent

The rising incidence of invasive fungal infections and the emergence of broader fungal resistance have led to the need for novel antifungal agents. Posaconazole is a new member of the triazole class of antifungals. It is available as an oral suspension and has a favorable toxicity profile, has demonstrated clinical efficacy in the treatment of oropharyngeal candidiasis and has shown promise as salvage therapy for invasive aspergillosis, zygomycosis, cryptococcal meningitis and a variety of other fungal infections. In addition, data from randomized controlled studies support its efficacy for use in prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections in patients who are severely immunocompromised. The wide spectrum activity of posaconazole in in vitro studies, animal models and preliminary clinical studies suggest that posaconazole represents an important addition to the antifungal armamentarium.