Measurement of health-related quality of life in multiple myeloma

When a randomized trial (NMSG 4/90) comparing treatment with melphalan/prednisone to melphalan/prednisone + interferon α-2b in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma was inititated in 1990, a quality-of-life assessment was integrated into the study. We used the questionnaire (QLQ-C30) developed by the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Study Group on Quality of Life. The QLQ-C30 incorporates five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health and quality-of-life scale and some single symptom measures. The questionnaire was completed prior to treatment and after 1, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months. 524 (90.2%) of 581 patients enrolled in the NMSG 4/90 completed the first questionnaire, and 484 (83.3%) completed all questionnaires given to them. All but one of the scales met the minimum criteria of reliability (Cronbach's alpha ≥0.70). Validity was shown by (1) the ability of the scales to discriminate clearly between patients differing in clinical status as defined by pre-treatment W.H.O. performance index and Durie & Salmon stage, and (2) the sensitivity to changes in objective disease status (response and relapse). This is the first report of the measurement of health-related quality of life in a prospective clinical trial in multiple myeloma. The results demonstrate that the QLQ-C30 is a reliable and valid instrument for the measurement of quality of life in these patients. The data will be used for a cost–utility analysis of the results of the NMSG 4/90 trial.     

Methodological aspects of health-related quality of life measurement and analysis in patients with multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable but treatment-sensitive cancer. For most patients, this means treatment with multiple lines of anti-myeloma therapy and a life with disease- and treatment-related symptoms and complications. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) issues play an important role in treatment decision-making. Methodological challenges in longitudinal HRQoL measurements and analyses have been identified, including non-responses (NR) to scheduled questionnaires. Publications were identified for inclusion in a systematic review of longitudinal HRQoL studies in MM, focussing on methodological aspects of HRQoL measurement and analysis. Diversity in timing of HRQoL data collection and applied statistical methods were noted. We observed a high rate of NR, but the impact of NR was investigated in only 8/23 studies. Thus, evidence-based knowledge of HRQoL in patients with MM is compromised. To improve quality of HRQoL results and their implementation in daily practice, future studies should follow established guidelines.     

MRC trial of α2b-interferon maintenance therapy in first plateau phase of multiple myeloma

Plateau phase has been achieved in 64% of all newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma treated with the ABCM (adriamycin, BiCNU, cyclophosphamide and melphalan) regimen in the Medical Research Council (MRC) trials; this stable clinical stage of the disease is associated with no more than minimal symptoms. Several studies have found that α-interferon (α-IFN) maintenance therapy increases the duration of plateau phase, but it is less clear if this translates into prolonged survival. We report the effect of α-IFN on the duration of plateau phase and overall survival in a trial with 284 patients who were randomized to receive α2b-IFN (Intron-A) or no maintenance therapy during first plateau phase. The minimum follow-up after randomization was 21 months. There was no significant difference in the overall survival between the two treatment groups (χ² = 0.32, P = 0.57). There was a trend towards longer relapse-free survival in the patients allocated α-IFN, but this trend to longer plateau phase was not statistically significant (χ² = 1.62, P = 0.2). Disease progression at relapse on α-IFN appears to be more severe with greater elevations from plateau levels of serum paraprotein (P = 0.06) and β₂-microglobulin (P = 0.03) levels. Physicians tended to start chemotherapy sooner after diagnosis of relapse when patients had received α-IFN (P = 0.16). Although, in common with most other studies, there is a trend for patients treated with α-IFN to have a longer plateau phase, this is counteracted by morbidity attributable to the treatment and a somewhat shortened survival post relapse. Meta-analysis of interferon trials is required to assess whether the minor trend for longer survival in patients maintained on α-IFN found in some studies is significant and, if so, the extent of this advantage.     

A randomized trial of maintenance interferon following high-dose chemotherapy in multiple myeloma: long-term follow-up results

High-dose chemotherapy (melphalan) with autologous marrow stem cell support (AMSCS) results in high response rates in multiple myeloma (MM), with up to 50% of patients achieving complete remission. However, these remissions are generally not durable. As the cytokine interferon alpha has been shown to prolong partial response following conventional chemotherapy, this trial was conducted to evaluate its role following high-dose chemotherapy. 85 patients were randomly assigned to maintenance treatment with interferon alpha, 3 × 10⁶ units/m² subcutaneously three times weekly until relapse or no further treatment following recovery from high-dose chemotherapy (melphalan 140–200 mg/m² or busulphan 16 mg/kg) combined with AMSCS. At 5.8 years following the accrual of the last patient in this trial, 38 patients had died, 17 in the interferon arm and 21 in the control arm. The median progression-free survival (PFS) in the 42 patients randomized to interferon alpha was 46 months versus 27 months in the controls. Both overall survival and PFS, which were highly significant at median follow-up of 52 months, have now ceased to be significant, because most patients have ultimately succumbed to their disease. Interferon was tolerated by the majority of patients with very good compliance. Toxicity consisted mainly of flu-like symptoms and malaise which were usually self-limiting. The results of such a pilot study should be carefully interpreted and the benefits of interferon should be confirmed in larger multi-centre studies in the setting of minimal residual disease following autologous transplantation.     

Health-related quality of life assessed before and during chemotherapy predicts for survival in multiple myeloma

Measurement of health-related quality of life was integrated into a randomized trial (NMSG 4/90) comparing melphalan/prednisone to melphalan/prednisone + interferon α-2b in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. One of the aims of the study was to assess the prognostic significance of quality-of-life scores, using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Univariate analysis showed a highly significant association with survival from the start of therapy for physical functioning as well as role and cognitive functioning, global quality of life, fatigue and pain. In multivariate analysis, physical functioning and W.H.O. performance status were independent prognostic factors ( P values=0.001 for both) when analysed in a Cox regression model with the somatic variables β-2 microglobulin, skeletal disease and age. The best prediction for survival from the start of therapy was obtained by combining the β-2 microglobulin and physical functioning scores in a variable consisting of three risk factor levels with an estimated median survival of 17, 29 and 49 months, respectively. At a 12 months landmark analysis, the relative risk for patients with physical functioning score 0–20 v 80–100 was 5.63 (99% CI 2.76–11.49), whereas the relative risk for patients without an objective response to chemotherapy compared to those with at least a minor response was 2.32 (99% CI 1.44–3.74). Quality-of-life assessment may be an independent and valuable addition to the known prognostic factors in multiple myeloma.     

Bortezomib is associated with better health-related quality of life than high-dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma: results from the APEX study

Health-related quality of life (HRQL) was prospectively measured during the phase III APEX trial of bortezomib versus dexamethasone in relapsed multiple myeloma patients. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core (QLQ-C30) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (NTX) side-effects questionnaires were administered at baseline and every 6 weeks up to 42 weeks. Patients receiving bortezomib (1.3 mg/m(2), days 1, 4, 8 and 11 for eight 3-week cycles, then days 1, 8, 15 and 22 for three 5-week cycles; n = 296) demonstrated significantly better mean Global Health Status over the study versus patients receiving dexamethasone (40 mg/d, days 1-4, 9-12, and 17-20 for four 5-week cycles, then days 1-4 only for five 4-week cycles; n = 302), plus significantly better physical health, role, cognitive, and emotional functioning scores, lower dyspnoea and sleep symptom scores, and better NTX questionnaire score, using multiple imputation to account for missing data. Results were similar using available-data analyses. Sensitivity analyses suggested that improved HRQL with bortezomib is at least partially explained by improved survival. These results show that bortezomib was associated with significantly better multidimensional HRQL compared with dexamethasone, consistent with the better clinical outcomes seen with bortezomib.     

Development of an EORTC questionnaire module to be used in health-related quality-of-life assessment for patients with multiple myeloma. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Study Group on Quality of Life

A multiple myeloma-specific quality-of-life questionnaire module has been designed in collaboration with the EORTC Quality-of-Life Study Group to be used in clinical trials with the EORTC QLQ-C30, a general cancer questionnaire. Strict methodology was employed to ensure thorough and appropriate development of the module. An extensive literature review was performed to identify health-related quality-of-life issues relevant to patients with multiple myeloma. Semi-structured interviews were then carried out in several European countries with health-care providers experienced in the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma, and with a group of patients with multiple myeloma, to identify the issues which were most important to patients. A questionnaire was devised from the list of issues, using a 1-week time-frame and response categories consistent with the EORTC QLQ-C30. The provisional questionnaire and the EORTC QLQ-C30 were administered to patients with multiple myeloma in each participating country with further semi-structured interviews to refine the content and design of the questionnaire. A review of the results obtained in each stage of development resulted in a 24-item myeloma-specific module, the EORTC QLQ-MY24, which assesses disease-specific symptoms and their impact on everyday life, treatment side-effects, social support, and future perspective. The module is currently undergoing further international field-testing to assess its psychometric properties.     

Health related quality of life in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing a double transplantation

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the subjective well-being of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who were treated in a tandem transplantation programme. METHODS: Fifty-one patients participated in the prospective, longitudinal questionnaire study. The EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EuroQol-5D were administered 2 wk after completion of vincristine, adriamycin and dexamethason/vincristine, adriamycin and methyl prednison (VAD/VAMP) chemotherapy, both at hospital discharge after treatment with high-dose melphalan (HDM) and 1 month after this hospital discharge, at hospital admission, at the day of hospital discharge for peripheral stem cell transplantation (PSCT) and at 6 and 12 months following discharge after PSCT. RESULTS: Overall, patients' functioning improved during treatment and follow-up, with significant decreases shortly following PSCT. Shortly after HDM and PSCT, patients reported a considerable increase in levels of soreness in the mouth (+26/+36 points on a scale ranging form 0 to 100; P < 0.01), change of taste (+23/+21 points; P < 0.05/NS), nausea/vomiting (+26/+27 points; P < 0.01/< 0.05), appetite loss (+40/+43 points; P < 0.001) and diarrhoea (+25/+36 points; P < 0.01). However, none of these symptoms persisted during follow-up. CONCLUSION: The intensive treatment programme was subjectively being well tolerated by the majority of patients. The duration of declined quality of life after administration of HDM seemed to be short. The duration of subjective recovery after PSCT remained uncertain, but in any case was present at the 6 month follow-up. Together with the rather good results in survival, the evaluation of quality of life invites further exploration of double transplantations in multiple myeloma.     

Addition of thalidomide to oral melphalan/prednisone in patients with multiple myeloma not eligible for transplantation: results of a randomized trial from the Turkish Myeloma Study Group

The combination of melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide (MPT) has been investigated in several clinical studies that differed significantly with regard to patient characteristics and treatment schedules. This prospective trial differs from previous melphalan-prednisone (MP) vs. MPT trials by treatment dosing, duration, routine anticoagulation, and permission for a crossover. Newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma (MM) (n=122) aged greater than 55 yr, not eligible for transplantation were randomized to receive 8 cycles of M (9 mg/m(2) /d) and P (60 mg/m(2) /d) for 4d every 6 wk (n=62) or MP and thalidomide (100 mg/d) continuously (n=60). Primary endpoint was treatment response and toxicities following 4 and 8 cycles of therapy. Secondary endpoints were disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Overall, MPT-treated patients were younger (median 69 yr vs. 72 yr; P=0.016) and had a higher incidence of renal impairment (RI, 19% vs. 7%, respectively; P=0.057). After 4 cycles of treatment (n=115), there were more partial responses or better in the MPT arm than in the MP arm (57.9% vs. 37.5%; P=0.030). However, DFS and OS were not significantly different between the arms after a median of 23 months follow-up (median OS 26.0 vs. 28.0 months, P=0.655; DFS 21.0 vs. 14.0 months, P=0.342, respectively). Crossover to MPT was required in 11 patients, 57% of whom responded to treatment. A higher rate of grade 3-4 infections was observed in the MPT arm compared with the MP arm (22.4% vs. 7.0%; P=0.033). However, none of these infections were associated with febrile neutropenia. Death within the first 3 months was observed more frequently in the MP arm (n=8, 14.0%) than in the MPT arm (n=2, 3.4%; P=0.053). Long-term discontinuation and dose reduction rates were also analyzed (MPT: 15.5% vs. MP: 5.3%; P=0.072). Although patients treated with MPT were relatively younger and had more frequent RI, better responses and less early mortality were observed in all age groups despite more frequent discontinuation.     

Serum calcium is an independent predictor of quality of life in multiple myeloma

Bone disease is an important feature of multiple myeloma, and hypercalcaemia is a frequent complication of this disease. We examined the association between serum calcium and quality of life (QOL) scores of 686 multiple myeloma patients at the time of diagnosis. Data from two Nordic studies using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire were analysed by means of linear regression analysis and a curve fitting program. Serum calcium was independently related to appetite loss, nausea/vomiting and physical functioning (P < 0.001) and to cognitive functioning (P = 0.001), i.e. scores reflecting symptoms that are well known in non-malignant hypercalcaemia. In addition, we found a highly significant independent relationship between serum calcium and the scores for fatigue and pain (P < 0.001). Serum calcium appeared to be as strong a predictor for fatigue as the concentration of haemoglobin. A cubic model (y = a + bx3) fitted the data slightly better than the simple linear model (y = a + bx) and suggested worsening QOL scores at levels of serum calcium above 2.5-3.0 mmol/L. Hypercalcaemia in patients with multiple myeloma seems to be associated with the same symptoms as in non-malignant hypercalcaemia. In addition, an increased level of serum calcium may aggravate the pain and fatigue caused by the skeletal disease itself.     

Health related quality of life in a nationally representative sample of haematological patients

Objectives: Knowledge of health related quality of life of haematological patients is limited. This study aimed at investigating the prevalence and predictors of symptoms and problems in a representative sample of haematological patients in Denmark. Methods: A random sample of patients with leukaemia, multiple myeloma and advanced lymphoma (n = 732) received the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality‐of‐life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ‐C30). Mean scores were calculated. In addition, scores were dichotomised using two thresholds: patients reporting at least ‘a little’ of each EORTC QLQ‐C30 symptom/problem were classified as having a ‘symptom/problem’, and patients reporting at least ‘quite a bit’ were classified as having a ‘severe symptom/problem’. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify predictors. Results: In total, 470 (64%) patients participated. The most frequent symptoms/problems were fatigue (55%; severe 20%), reduced role function (49%; severe 23%), insomnia (46%; severe 15%), and pain (37%; severe 15%). Older patients and patients in active antineoplastic treatment had more symptoms and problems. There was only little evidence of social inequalities. Conclusion: This is probably the first nationally representative study of symptoms and problems in haematological patients. These patients have symptoms/problems that deserve attention. Health related quality of life is an important issue in haematological malignancies.     

Health‐related quality of life assessment in randomised controlled trials in multiple myeloma: a critical review of methodology and impact on treatment recommendations

Objectives: Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) often have pronounced symptoms and substantially reduced quality of life. The aims of treatment are to control disease, maximise quality of life and prolong survival. Hence, health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) should be an important end‐point in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in addition to traditional endpoints. We wanted to evaluate whether trials reporting HRQOL outcomes have influenced clinical decision making and whether HRQOL was assessed robustly according to predefined criteria. Methods: A systematic review identified RCTs in MM with HRQOL assessment as a study end‐point. The methodological quality of these studies was assessed according to a checklist developed for evaluating HRQOL outcomes in clinical trials. The impact of the HRQOL results on clinical decision making was assessed, using published clinical guidelines as a reference. Results: Fifteen publications presenting RCTs with HRQOL as a study end‐point were identified. In 13 trials, the author stated that HRQOL results should influence clinical decision making. We found, however, that the HRQOL data only had a limited impact on published treatment guidelines for bisphosphonates, high‐dose treatment, interferon, erythropoiesis‐stimulating agents and novel agents. Conclusion: The present review indicates that the there are still few RCTs in MM including HRQOL as a study end‐point. Systematic incorporation of HRQOL measures into clinical trials allows for a comparison of treatment arms that includes the patients’ perspective. Before the full impact on clinical decisions can be realised, the quality and methodology of collecting HRQOL data must be further improved and the results rendered more comprehensible to clinicians.     

Psychosocial QOL is an independent predictor of overall survival in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma

Only few studies have analyzed quality of life (QOL) and its association with prognosis in patients with multiple myeloma. We studied QOL at start of conventional treatment to evaluate the impact of symptomatic myeloma on QOL and to determine the prognostic significance of various dimensions of QOL. Our study provided further evidence of the significant impairment of QOL in patients with multiple myeloma at onset of therapy. Furthermore, our data showed a closer correlation between the more physical QOL scales such as pain, fatigue, physical functioning and global QOL with the activity of the disease than between psychosocial dimensions such as role, emotional, social, and cognitive functioning and the status of the disease. Multivariate analyses including each a QOL scale and known prognostic parameters (response to therapy, creatinine level, calcium, LDH, Hb, beta2-microglobulin, and albumin) revealed a marked difference in the prognostic significance between psychosocial and other QOL scales. All psychosocial dimensions of QOL were found to be independent prognostic factors, while physical QOL and global QOL were eliminated by disease-associated prognosticators. Taken together, QOL was found to be significantly impaired in myeloma patients at start of therapy. Psychosocial, but not physical dimensions of QOL were found to be independent prognostic factors.     

Melphalan, prednisone, thalidomide and defibrotide in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: results of a multicenter phase I/II trial

Background

Defibrotide is a novel orally bioavailable polydisperse oligonucleotide with anti-thrombotic and anti-adhesive effects. In SCID/NOD mice, defibrotide showed activity in human myeloma xenografts. This phase I/II study was conducted to identify the most appropriate dose of defibrotide in combination with melphalan, prednisone and thalidomide in patients with relapsed and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, and to determine its safety and tolerability as part of this regimen.

Design and Methods

This was a phase I/II, multicenter, dose-escalating, non-comparative, open label study. Oral melphalan was administered at a dose of 0.25 mg/kg on days 1–4, prednisone at a dose of 1.5 mg/kg also on days 1–4 and thalidomide at a dose of 50–100 mg/day continuously. Defibrotide was administered orally at three dose-levels: 2.4, 4.8 or 7.2 g on days 1–4 and 1.6, 3.2, or 4.8 g on days 5–35.

Results

Twenty-four patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma were enrolled. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed. In all patients, the complete response plus very good partial response rate was 9%, and the partial response rate was 43%. The 1-year progression-free survival and 1-year overall survival rates were 34% and 90%, respectively. The most frequent grade 3–4 adverse events included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia and fatigue. Deep vein thrombosis was reported in only one patient.

Conclusions

This combination of melphalan, prednisone and thalidomide together with defibrotide showed anti-tumor activity with a favorable tolerability. The maximum tolerated dose of defibrotide was identified as 7.2 g p.o. on days 1–4 followed by 4.8 g p.o. on days 5–35. Further trials are needed to confirm the role of this regimen and to evaluate the combination of defibrotide with new drugs (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00406978).