The effect of dose reduction on the detection of anatomical structures on panoramic radiographs

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to evaluate the effect of dose reduction on diagnostic accuracy using different screen-film combinations and digital techniques for panoramic radiography. METHODS: Five observers assessed 201 pairs of panoramic radiographs (a total of 402 panoramic radiographs) taken with the Orthophos Plus (Sirona, Bensheim, Germany), for visualization of 11 anatomical structures on each side, using a 3-point scale -1, 0 and 1. Two radiographs of each patient were taken at two different times (conventional setting and setting with decreased dose, done by increasing tube potential settings or halving tube current). To compare the dose at different tube potential settings dose-length product was measured at the secondary collimator. Films with medium and regular intensifying screens (high and low tube potential settings) and storage phosphor plates (low tube potential setting, tube current setting equivalent to regular intensifying screen and halved) were compared. The five observers made 27 610 assessments. Intrarater agreement was expressed by Cohen's kappa coefficient. RESULTS: The results demonstrated an equivalence of regular screens (low tube potential setting) and medium screens (high and low tube potential settings). A significant difference existed between medium screens (low tube potential setting, mean score 0.92) and the group of regular film-screen combinations at high tube potential settings (mean score 0.89) and between all film-screen combinations and the digital system irrespective of exposure (mean score below 0.82). There were no significant differences between medium and regular screens (mean score 0.88 to 0.92) for assessment of the periodontal ligament space, but there was a significant difference compared with the digital system (mean score below 0.76). The kappa coefficient for intrarater agreement was moderate (0.55). CONCLUSIONS: New regular intensifying screens can replace medium screens at low tube potential settings. Digital panoramic radiographs should be taken at low tube potential levels with an exposure equivalent at least to a regular intensifying screen.     

Reduced radiation dose helical chest CT: effect on reader evaluation of structures and lung findings

PURPOSE: To assess, by using computer simulation, the effect of the use of reduced computed tomographic (CT) tube current on reader evaluation of structures and lung findings on images obtained at clinically indicated chest CT examinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The noise level in the raw scan data of 150 clinically indicated conventional tube current (200-320-mA) chest CT examinations was modified to simulate tube current reduction to 100 and to 40 mA. A total of 450 image sets were thus available. Four radiologists blinded to the tube current used assessed the image sets in random order for 14 structures and lung findings and ranked subjective image quality by using a five-point scale (1 = nondiagnostic, 2 = inferior, 3 = adequate, 4 = good, 5 = excellent). After a 3-week interval, the 150 conventional tube current image sets were rescored so that intraobserver agreement could be assessed. The McNemar statistic was used to determine whether there were more scoring disagreements between interpretations of the conventional and those of the reduced tube current scans or between the two interpretations of the conventional tube current scans. RESULTS: When overall agreement for 14 structures and lung findings was pooled over four observers, significantly more disagreements (P <.05) were seen when scores were compared between conventional and reduced tube current scans than when scores were compared between repeated interpretations of the conventional tube current scans. There was a significant decrease (P <.05) in the subjective image quality of reduced tube current scans compared with the subjective image quality of conventional tube current scans. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that reduced tube current does affect reader evaluation of structures and lung findings and reduces a reader's subjective assessment of image quality.     

Diagnostic accuracy of in vitro panoramic radiographs depending on the exposure

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to evaluate the effect of dose reduction on diagnostic accuracy in panoramic radiographs with increased tube potential and reduced milliampere settings. METHODS: Panoramic radiographs of 12 dried human skulls prepared with lesions in the bone, teeth and peri-implant bone in ascending size were taken. Medium and regular film--screen combinations and a storage phosphor system were used for imaging. All systems were exposed at a low and a high tube potential level. To compare the dose at different tube potential settings, dose length product was measured at the secondary collimator. Five observers assessed the presence (response: 1) or absence (response: 0) of lesions. Sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy were evaluated and 36 000 ratings were made in all. All settings were repeated once. Intrarater agreement was expressed by Cohen's kappa coefficient. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy between a medium and a regular film--screen combination at a low tube potential level (70 kV; 0.935 and 0.930) and the medium film--screen system at a high tube potential level (85 kV; 0.926). Compared with this group, the regular film-screen combinations at high tube potential level (85 kV, 0.906) and all digital radiographs were significantly different (0.886 and 0.866), irrespective of the tube potential level. The digital panoramic radiograph was only comparable with the best film--screen combinations with an exposure for a medium film-screen system and at a low tube potential level. Sensitivity was 89.9% and specificity 93.7%. The kappa coefficient for intrarater agreement was high (0.81). CONCLUSIONS: The medium intensifying screen can be used at high tube potential settings instead of low tube potential settings, or the regular intensifying screen can be used at low tube potential settings with the same diagnostic value. A dose reduction of about 40% is possible. The storage phosphor plates should be exposed at least like a regular film-screen system and at a low tube potential level.     

Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part II: Occupational exposure

OBJECTIVES: To measure occupational radiation dose during panoramic exposure from five digital panoramic X-ray units. METHODS: Exposures were made with five different digital panoramic units, of which four were equipped with a direct digital CCD (charge coupled device, "direct digital" technique), and one used storage phosphor plates ("indirect digital" technique). An anthropomorphic phantom served as the patient. An ionization chamber recorded the scattered radiation at 1 m from the phantom at five different locations around the panoramic units, both at the level of the thyroid gland and the level of the gonads, and effective organ doses were calculated. Exposure parameters were set as recommended by the manufacturers for the particular image and patient size: tube potential settings ranged between 64 kV and 74 kV, exposure times between 8.2 s and 19.0 s, tube current values between 4 mA and 7 mA. RESULTS: The maximum organ equivalent dose at 1 m from the panoramic unit was 0.60 microGy, the maximum organ effective dose was 0.10 microSv. Organ equivalent doses varied between 0.18 microGy and 0.30 microGy and organ effective doses between 0.01 microSv and 0.05 microSv for the different positions around the units (average for the different panoramic units). The variations in organ doses for the various machines were 0.04-0.53 microGy organ equivalent dose and 0.01-0.08 microSv organ effective dose. CONCLUSIONS: Assuming that 500 panoramic radiographs per year are taken by a dental practitioner at 1 m distance from the panoramic unit, he or she will receive an annual additional organ effective dose between 5 microSv and 15 microSv for the thyroid gland and between 5 microSv and 40 microSv for the gonads, depending on the type of digital panoramic unit.     

Sixteen-detector row CT of abdomen and pelvis: study for optimization of Z-axis modulation technique performed in 153 patients

PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine the optimal noise indexes required to obtain diagnostically acceptable computed tomographic (CT) images of the abdomen and pelvis with z-axis modulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-five patients underwent 16-section multi-detector row CT of the abdomen and pelvis with z-axis modulation at noise indexes of 10.5, 11.0, 11.5, and 12.0 HU with 10-380 mA. Subsequently, 58 patients were scanned at noise indexes of 12.5 and 15.0 HU with 75-380 mA. The weights of all subjects were recorded, and transverse and anteroposterior diameters were measured. The CT images were evaluated for abnormalities and graded for image quality in terms of noise and diagnostic acceptability by using a five-point scale. Objective noise in the liver parenchyma was measured, and the tube current was recorded at each section in all 153 patients. Statistical analyses were performed to determine the appropriate noise index and to assess the effect of patient weight and abdominal diameters on image noise and diagnostic acceptability at different noise indexes. Tube current-time products (in milliampere seconds) at various noise indexes were compared with those at CT previously performed without z-axis modulation. RESULTS: No significant difference in subjective image noise or diagnostic acceptability was found at noise indexes of 10.5-15.0 HU (P =.14), and objective noise was significantly inferior only at a noise index of 15.0 HU (P =.009). Compared with CT scanning at a 10.5-HU noise index, CT scanning at 12.5- and 15.0-HU noise indexes yielded, respectively, 10.0% and 41.3% reductions in radiation exposure. Patient weight and abdominal diameters affected subjective image quality. CONCLUSION: Use of a 15.0-HU noise index at 75-380 mA results in acceptable subjective image noise and diagnostic acceptability but significantly greater objective image noise at routine abdominal-pelvic CT. For greater image quality demands, a noise index of 12.5 HU results in acceptable image quality and a 19.6% reduction in radiation exposure.     

Abdominal spiral CT in children: which radiation exposure is required?

We decided to test to what extent dose reduction is possible in abdominal spiral computed tomography (CT) in young children without loss of anatomic diagnostic information. A retrospective study was performed of 30 abdominal CT examinations of children aged 3 months to 7 years. These were divided into two groups: group A with reduced radiation exposure (tube current 50 mA, CT dose index CTDIFDA < or =0.83 mGy) and group B with standard radiation exposure (tube current > or =100 mA, CTDIFDA > or =1.66 mGy). Image quality was assessed using a four-part scale ('excellent', 'good', 'sufficient', 'poor') on visual image impression and visibility of 32 anatomical details. Five experienced radiologists read the CT scans independently who were blinded to the examination parameters. Differences in ranked data were evaluated with Wilcoxon's rank sum test. No difference between groups A and B was observed in visual image impression. Detail visibility was significantly lower in group A, but the differences were limited to right upper quadrant structures (portal vein, common bile duct, pancreatic head, adrenals) and to arterial branches. Significant differences in visibility rated as 'poor' were only found for the hepatic, splenic and renal arteries; all other structures showed no difference between groups A and B. A protocol with reduced radiation exposure (50 mA, CTDIFDA < or =0.83 mGy) allowed the demonstration of most anatomic structures in abdominal spiral CT in young children. For the precise demonstration of small details (e.g. structures of the right upper quadrant), a protocol with standard radiation exposure (> or =100 mAs) was superior.     

Dose reduction in digital chest radiography and perceived image quality

The aim of the study was to investigate whether radiologists can rank the image quality of digital radiographs with different doses; a preliminary study investigated whether reduced dose images provide sufficient diagnostic quality. Raw data of 40 chest radiographs (posteroanterior (PA) and lateral) obtained with a full-field slot-scan charge-coupled device system in 20 patients with chest pathology were used. Noise was added to simulate reduced dose levels to 50%, 25% and 12%. Four observers ranked the quality of the corresponding images and judged the diagnostic quality. Linear regression analysis was performed. Differences were found in image quality at the different dose levels for both PA (p相似文献   

Quality of film-based and digital panoramic radiography

OBJECTIVES: To compare the image quality of panoramic radiographs obtained with storage phosphor plate and screen-film systems. METHODS: Panoramic radiographs were taken in 60 patients both with film and with a storage phosphor plate system (30 with DenOptix (Dentsply/Gendex) and 30 with Digora PCT). The images were obtained with either the Cranex Tome or the Scanora multimodal X-ray unit. The screen-film combination was Lanex medium/Curix Ortho HT-G. The digital images were displayed as 8-bit images with a 300 dpi resolution on a 19" monitor and the film images were placed on a light box adjacent to the screen. Ten observers evaluated diagnostic image quality by means of visual grading analysis of different anatomical structures. The structures were scored as being visualized much better (5), better (4), equal (3), worse (2) or much worse (1) in the digital images than in the film images. The mean number of patients receiving the different scores was calculated. Statistical methods used were Wilcoxon sign rank test and Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: On average, visualization was equal in 19 of the 30 patients imaged using Digora PCT; in 10 it was worse. The corresponding values for DenOptix were 20 and 9. The difference between the film-based and the digital images was small but statistically significant (P<0.0001). The difference between the two image plate systems was not statistically significant (P>/=0.17). CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that digital panoramic radiographs are equivalent to film-based images for most purposes.     

End-user survey for digital sensor characteristics: a pilot questionnaire study

OBJECTIVE: To survey end-user opinions on dental digital sensor characteristics for the design of a new X-ray imaging sensor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 100 questionnaires were sent out to dentists and dental radiologists. The questionnaire consisted of six parts related to dental sensors. A: Details about the respondent; B: Prioritization of most important aspects of digital sensors; C: Rating advantages and D: disadvantages of digital sensors; F: Dental features that need to be enhanced by digital sensors; G: End-user comments. RESULTS: Fifty-six questionnaires were returned. Contrast resolution and imaging time were assessed as the most and the least important aspects, respectively. Aspects considered as advantages by approximately 80% of respondents were: optimal contrast resolution, increased specificity, increased discrimination between diseased and healthy tissue, increased sensitivity, lower dose to the patient by more than 20%; as a disadvantage, increased patient dose was given. Dental features considered important by over 80% of the respondents were for intraoral radiographs: the visibility of caries, periapical, periodontal, and bone lesions; for panoramic radiographs: reduction of ghost images, image sharpness and bone. Bone and soft tissues on cephalograms and bone on temporomandibular joint (TMJ) tomograms were mentioned by over 70%. CONCLUSION: The most desired characteristic for a new sensor is contrast resolution. Dose saving is not considered as important unless it is more than 20%. Examination time is not a major issue. Caries, periapical and periodontal, and bone lesions for intraoral radiographs, reduction of ghost images, image sharpness and bone for panoramic radiographs were the most frequently mentioned dental features that should be enhanced by digital sensors.     

Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part I: Patient exposure

OBJECTIVES: To measure patient radiation dose during panoramic exposure with various panoramic units for digital panoramic imaging. METHODS: An anthropomorphic phantom was filled with thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLD 100) and exposed with five different digital panoramic units during ten consecutive exposures. Four machines were equipped with a direct digital CCD (charge coupled device) system, whereas one of the units used storage phosphor plates (indirect digital technique). The exposure settings recommended by the different manufacturers for the particular image and patient size were used: tube potential settings ranged between 64 kV and 74 kV, exposure times between 8.2 s and 19.0 s, at fuse current values between 4 mA and 7 mA. The effective radiation dose was calculated with inclusion of the salivary glands. RESULTS: Effective radiation doses ranged between 4.7 microSv and 14.9 microSv for one exposure. Salivary glands absorbed the most radiation for all panoramic units. When indirect and direct digital panoramic systems were compared, the effective dose of the indirect digital unit (8.1 microSv) could be found within the range of the effective doses for the direct digital units (4.7-14.9 microSv). CONCLUSIONS: A rather wide range of patient radiation doses can be found for digital panoramic units. There is a tendency for lower effective doses for digital compared with analogue panoramic units, reported in previous studies.     

Optimization of Z-axis automatic exposure control for multidetector row CT evaluation of neck and comparison with fixed tube current technique for image quality and radiation dose

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Z-axis automatic exposure control (AEC) technique automatically adjusts tube current based on size of body region scanned. The purpose of the current study was to compare diagnostic acceptability, noise, and radiation exposure of multidetector row CT (MDCT) of neck performed with z-axis AEC and with fixed current. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two study groups of 26 patients each underwent MDCT of neck using z-axis AEC with 8 noise index (NI), 150-440 mA, and 10 NI, 75-440 mA, respectively. A control group consisting of another 26 patients underwent MDCT of neck with fixed-current technique (300 mA). Objective noise and mean tube current-time products (mA . s) were recorded. Two radiologists evaluated images for diagnostic acceptability and subjective noise on a 5-point scale. RESULTS: All CT examinations of study and control groups were diagnostically acceptable, though objective noise was significantly more with z-axis AEC (shoulder: NI 8, 20.6 +/- 6.2 HU; NI 10, 22.2 +/- 4.6 HU) than with fixed current (16.2 +/- 6 HU) (P = .01). There was no significant difference between AEC and fixed current in diagnostic acceptability and subjective noise (P = .22-.42). AEC resulted in significant radiation dose reduction (NI 8, 186.3 +/- 20.5 mA . s; NI 10, 158.1 +/- 21.2 mA x s), compared with fixed current (235 +/- 21.8 mA x s). CONCLUSION: Z-axis AEC resulted in similar subjective noise and diagnostic acceptability, with radiation dose reduction of 21% for NI of 8 and 33% for NI of 10, respectively, for MDCT evaluation of neck, compared with those of fixed current technique.     

Narrowing of the inferior dental canal in relation to the lower third molars

OBJECTIVES: To assess narrowing of the inferior dental canal in the lower third molar regions using computed tomography (CT) and to determine the value of radiographic markers on rotational panoramic radiographs in assessing the true relationships of the inferior dental canal. METHODS: Patients referred for CT assessment of impacted lower third molars were used in this study. The lower third molars were assessed using CT to determine the position and morphology of the inferior dental canal relative to the roots and the cortical plates. The radiographic markers on rotational panoramic radiographs were correlated with the CT findings when rotational panoramic radiographs were available. RESULTS: The patients referred had 202 lower third molars. Inferior positioning of the inferior dental canal was the most common location on CT. Narrowing of the inferior dental canal was found in relation to the lower third molars in 66.8% of cases. The chance of narrowing of the inferior dental canal as shown using CT increased when at least one of the radiographic markers, superimposition, narrowing, deviation or reduction in density was present on the rotational panoramic radiograph. Deviation of the inferior dental canal on rotational panoramic radiographs was found to be the most significant predictor of narrowing of the inferior dental canal and a close relationship to the roots, as shown in CT. CONCLUSIONS: Narrowing of the inferior dental canal is a common finding when impacted lower third molars are assessed using CT. On rotational panoramic radiographs deviation of the inferior dental canal is the best predictor of narrowing of the inferior dental canal and a close relationship to the roots.     

头部体模扫描试验对成人头颅CT低剂量扫描的优化初探

目的：通过对头部体模扫描试验,探讨成人头颅CT低剂量扫描参数。方法：以层厚10 mm,扫描时间为1 s,通过改变mA值,以10 mA为间隔,20-300 mA间29个不同mA条件对头部体模进行轴向扫描,对容积CT剂量指数（CTDIvol）、噪声（SD）和对比-噪声比（CNR）进行客观评价分析与统计学处理,对图像低密度分辨力进行主观评价。结果：①CTDIvol随mAs增大而增大,呈线线关系;与300 mAs的CTDIvol（42 mGy）比较,80-150 mAs的CTDIvol（11-21 mGy）下降73%-50%。②SD值随mAs升高而降低;SD值随mAs变化曲线可分为SD改变非常显著段（20-50 mAs）、显著段（50-80 mAs）、缓坡段（90-150 mAs）和平缓段（160-300 mAs）。③CNR随mAs改变与SD值改变相反。④SD值与CNR统计学处理：20 mAs与30 mAs、30 mAs与50 mAs5、0 mAs与80 mAs、80 mAs与150 mAs、150 mAs与300 mAs的各SD值及CNR有统计学差异（P〈0.05）;160-300 mAs的各SD值与CNR无统计学差异（P〉0.05）。⑤图像LCR主观评价：20-50 mAs,分辨低密度圆柱体困难;50-80 mAs,主观图像质量明显下降,图像对诊断有影响;90-150 mAs主观图像质量有一定改变;160-300 mAs主观图像质量改变不明显。结论：80-150 mAs为低对比要求较高的成人颅脑低剂量平扫可用区间,为临床降低扫描剂量提供了依据。临床患者检查,可以用100 mAs进行平扫,CT剂量指数明显降低。     

Radiation dose reduction in chest radiography using a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the image quality and the potential for radiation dose reduction with a digital flat-panel amorphous silicon detector radiography system. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using flat-panel technology, radiographs of an anthropomorphic thorax phantom were taken with a range of technical parameters (125kV, 200mA and 5, 4, 3.2, 2, 1, 0.5, and 0.25mAs) which were equivalent to a radiation dose of 332, 263, 209, 127, 58.7, 29, and 14 microGy, respectively. These images were compared to radiographs obtained by a conventional film-screen radiography system at 125kV, 200mA and 5mAs (equivalent to 252 microGy) which served as reference. Three observers evaluated independently the visibility of simulated rounded lesions and anatomical structures, comparing printed films from the flat-panel amorphous silicon detector and conventional x-ray system films. RESULTS: With flat-panel technology, the visibility of rounded lesions and normal anatomical structures at 5, 4, and 3.2mAs was superior compared to the conventional film-screen radiography system. (P< or =0.0001). At 2mAs, improvement was only marginal (P=0.19). At 1.0, 0.5 and 0.25mAs, the visibility of simulated rounded lesions was worse (P< or =0.004). Comparing fine lung parenchymal structures, the flat-panel amorphous silicon detector showed improvement for all exposure levels down to 2mAs and equality at 1mAs. CONCLUSION: Compared to a conventional x-ray film system, the flat-panel amorphous silicon detector demonstrated improved image quality and the possibility for a reduction of the radiation dose by 50% without loss in image quality.     

The use of reference image criteria in X-ray diagnostics: an application for the optimisation of lumbar spine radiographs

To ensure that sufficient image quality is obtained in diagnostic radiology, the image quality of clinical radiographs has to be evaluated. We present two methods herein for evaluating antero-posterior (AP) radiographs of the lumbar spine. One was using image criteria, including six anatomical details (absolute method). In the other, the visibility of anatomical details relative to a reference radiograph was evaluated (visual grading analysis). In total, 14 technique groups were evaluated. The technique groups differed in tube voltage and detector system characteristics. Six different gradients of the H&D curves were simulated. The visual grading analysis showed larger differences in image quality compared with the absolute method. The influence on the image quality due to a variation in tube voltage was easier to detect than the influence on the image quality from the detector characteristics. The visibility of the anatomical details was significantly dependent on the location in the spine. The visual grading analysis was found to be the preferable evaluation method in studies such as the present; however, it is necessary to guide and train the observer before the evaluation is performed.     

Computer-simulated radiation dose reduction for abdominal multidetector CT of pediatric patients

OBJECTIVE. Limiting CT radiation dose is especially critical when imaging children. The purpose of our study was to modify and test an accurate and safe tool for evaluating systematic dose reduction for abdominal multidetector CT (MDCT) in pediatric patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After validating the computer-simulation technique with a water phantom, we subjected the original digital scanning data for 26 contrast-enhanced abdominal MDCT scans (120 mA) obtained in infants and children (age range, 1 month-9 years; mean age, 3.1 years) to simulated tube current reduction (100, 80, 60, and 40 mA) by adding noise. this procedure created four additional examinations per child that were identical to the originals except for image noise. The 130 examinations were scored randomly, independently, and without prior knowledge of the children's diagnoses by three radiologists for depiction of high-visibility structures, such as adrenal glands and fat in the intrahepatic falciform ligament, and low-visibility structures, such as the extrahepatic hepatic artery, small intrahepatic vessels, and common bile duct. Aligned rank and Wilcoxon's signed rank tests were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS. Simulated tube current reduction significantly affected the detection of low-visibility structures (p < 0.001). Reduced detection in low-visibility structures was evident at a level less than or equal to 80 mA. No loss of detection in high-visibility structures was found at any tube current level (p > 0.5). CONCLUSION. The results of this computer simulation suggest that accurate abdominal MDCT can be performed in pediatric patients using substantially reduced radiation, depending on the indication for imaging. (In our case, the reduction was between 33% and 67%, depending on whether a high-visibility or low-visibility structure was being assessed.) This simulation technology can be applied to MDCT of other organ systems for systematic evaluation of radiation dose reduction.     

Digital radiography of the thorax with selenium detector. Clinical results and optimization potential of the technique

INTRODUCTION: We compared the image quality of the chest radiograph obtained with a digital selenium detector and with a conventional system and investigated the possible improvements in the digital technique resulting from kilovoltage (kV) lowering, antiscattering grid addition and image format reduction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 150 subjects in the first series were submitted to posteroanterior chest radiography with both the selenium and the conventional systems. Image quality was compared by giving a score to the depiction of anatominal and pathologic findings. Thirty-two and 31 subjects from two other series were submitted to two digital chest radiographs each: the former at high (150) and low (90) kV, and the latter at 150 kV with the antiscattering grid and at 90 kV without the grid. Comparisons were made by choosing the better of the two images of each subjects. A score was given to the depiction quality of several difficult-to-detect findings in full-size and small-size format digital images obtained in another series of 27 subjects. RESULTS: As for anatomical detailing, digital selenium images were of much better quality than conventional images: the mean scores given by 3 observers to digital images (5.32; 5.55; 6.68) are higher than those given to the corresponding conventional images (4.49; 5.02; 5.81) and the difference is statistically significant (p < 0.001 in all cases). The advantage of digital over conventional images is also significant with reference to diagnostic confidence in the identification of pathologic findings (p < 0.001; p < 0.005; p < 0.01), but to a lessere extent (mean scores: 3.98; 4.22; 3.60 for the digital system, versus 3.43; 3.69; 3.38 for the conventional system). The digital images acquired at lower kV (90 kV) were much more frequently chosen by the two observes (87.5% and 96.8% of cases) than the images acquired at 150 kV; the entry dose at lower energies (91 muGy using an anthropomorphic phantom) is not significantly higher than the dose given at 150 kV (85 muGy). No significant difference was found in the two observers' choice between the digital images taken at 90 kV without antiscattering grid and those taken at 150 kV with the grid, the former being preferred in 38.7% and 58% of cases. The level of diagnostic confidence in the detailing of difficult-to-detect findings was slightly higher in full-size digital images (mean scores: 5.33 and 6.77) than in small-size ones (4.88 and 5.96). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Digital selenium images always exibit better quality than conventional images: the difference is very marked relative to anatomical detailing and not so striking, though still significant, in showing pathologic findings. Digital selenium image quality can be improved relative to the manufacturer's guidelines (150 kV exposure with no grid), by lowering the kV and adding the antiscattering grid, without increasing patient exposure too much. Digital image format reduction allows cost containment without affecting diagnostic reliability.     

Digital radiography of the skeleton using a large-area detector based on amorphous silicon technology: image quality and potential for dose reduction in comparison with screen-film radiography

AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate a large-area, flat-panel X-ray detector (FD), based on caesium-iodide (CsI) and amorphous silicon (a-Si) with respect to skeletal radiography. Conventional images were compared with digital radiographs using identical and reduced radiation doses.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients were studied prospectively using conventional screen-film radiography (SFR; detector dose 2.5 microGy). Digital images were taken from the same patients with detector doses of 2.5, 1.25 and 0.625 microGy, respectively. The active-matrix detector had a panel size of 43 x 43 cm, a matrix of 3 x 3K, and a pixel size of 143 microm. All hard copies were presented in a random order to eight independent observers, who rated image quality according to subjective quality criteria. Results were assessed for significance using the Student's t -test (confidence level 95%).RESULTS: A statistically significant preference for digital over conventional images was revealed for all quality criteria, except for over-exposure (detector dose 2.5 microGy). Digital images with a 50% dose showed a small, statistically not significant, inferiority compared with SFR. The FD-technique was significantly inferior to SFR at 75% dose reduction regarding bone cortex and trabecula, contrast and overall impression. No statistically significant differences were found with regard to over- and under-exposure and soft tissue presentation.CONCLUSION: Amorphous silicon-based digital radiography yields good image quality. The potential for dose reduction depends on the clinical query.     

Influence of tube potential setting and dose on the visibility of lesions in intraoral radiography

OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to determine the diagnostic accuracy of different image receptors when first, the tube potential setting was increased from 60 kV to 90 kV and second, when the milliampere setting was reduced at unchanged tube potential for storage phosphor plates. METHODS: Intraoral radiographs (films of speed class F, storage phosphor plates) were taken of 12 dried human skulls prepared with lesions in both teeth and peri-implant bone, in ascending size. Five observers assessed the presence (response=1) or absence (response=0) of lesions. The digital intraoral radiograph was exposed at 60 kV and 90 kV with half and a quarter of the film exposure. Some of the radiographs were assessed a second time. In total, 6000 assessments were made. Intrarater agreement was expressed by Cohen's kappa coefficient. RESULTS: The digital combinations showed the lowest diagnostic accuracy in all combinations, but the results demonstrated an equivalence of all combinations of films and storage phosphor plates. The differences in diagnostic accuracy were low (94-96.5%). The kappa coefficient for intrarater agreement was high (0.85). CONCLUSIONS: Regarding peri-implant and decayed lesions, intraoral films and storage phosphor plates demonstrated equal quality in this in vitro study regardless of exposure at 60 kV or 90 kV.     

Reduction of patient exposure by the use of digital luminescence radiography

PURPOSE: To determine the minimum acceptable exposure for an adequate image quality using digital luminescence radiography (DLR) instead of screen-film system (SFS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The impact of different physical and technical parameters on image quality and exposure was evaluated by obtaining radiographs of a test phantom. Conventional and digital radiographs of a humanoid phantom, an anatomical preparation or an animal were obtained using variable mAs. The image quality was rated by eight experienced radiologists using clinical criteria of image quality. The image quality evaluation was analysed using graphs. RESULTS: The exposure could be reduced by 60% for skull radiographs, 57% for abdominal radiographs, and 25% for chest radiographs of premature infants when using DLR instead of conventional SFS. CONCLUSION: DLR provides adequate image quality with reasonably low exposure.