Pulmonary thromboembolism with floating thrombus trapped in patent foramen ovale

A 39-year-old man was hospitalized with symptoms of acute deep vein thrombosis, and computed tomography showed that he had pulmonary thromboembolism. Transthoracic echocardiography showed a large, right atrial thrombus and transesophageal echocardiography showed migrating thrombus trapped in a patent foramen ovale and extending all the way up to the ascending aorta. He underwent surgical embolectomy under cardiopulmonary bypass. At the conclusion of the operation, repeat transesophageal echocardiography examination revealed fresh but small thrombus in the right atrium. This continued entry of thrombi into the heart was further managed with fluoroscopy-guided insertion of a retrievable inferior vena cava filter through the internal jugular vein in the operating room itself.     

Paradoxical embolus caught in transit through a patent foramen ovale

Diagnosing a paradoxical embolism is challenging, and it can be proven only if the thrombus is identified across the intracardiac defect. Very few cases have been diagnosed as an impending paradoxical embolism. Recently, the diagnosis and management of these entities have greatly improved with the advent of transesophageal echocardiography (compared with transthoracic echocardiography). Pulmonary hypertension may cause right-to-left shunting across a patent foramen ovale and predispose development of a paradoxical embolism. We report a patient with an impending paradoxical embolism that was caught in transit across the patent foramen ovale. The patient was treated successfully with emergent surgery.     

Diagnosis and management of entrapped embolus through a patent foramen ovale

The diagnosis of impending paradoxical embolus by echocardiography is exceptional and its management remains unclear. Through a personal case, we performed an exhaustive review of the medical literature of this rare finding. Since the first report, only 43 cases have ever been reported. The superiority of transesophageal echocardiography is underlined. The clinical features are complex. The classical simultaneous pulmonary and paradoxical embolism is often absent. Therapeutic options are cardiac surgery, thrombolysis or anticoagulation. The early mortality rate is high (21%). In addition, recurrent embolisms are reported when a medical treatment is chosen. The cumulative results of each possibility are described.     

Septic paradoxical embolus through a patent foramen ovale after pacemaker implantation

A case of a septic paradoxic embolus due to an infected pacemaker lead associated with a patent foramen ovale (PFO) is described. Treatment consisted of immediate intracardiac embolectomy, pericardial patch closure of the PFO, total removal of the infected pacemaker lead and generator, and placement of a new permanent epicardial lead pacemaker system.     

Catastrophic paradoxical embolus after hemodialysis access thrombectomy in a patient with a patent foramen ovale

We present the first case of documented clot in-transit through a patent foramen ovale (PFO), caused by mechanical thrombectomy of a clotted AV fistula. Embolus after access thrombectomy is a rare, but known complication of the procedure. Paradoxical embolus is likewise a rare consequence of a right-sided clot, embolising to the left-sided circulation in a patient with a PFO. Suspected embolus through a PFO after dialysis access thrombectomy has been reported, but no case has ever documented the clot in-transit through the PFO.     

The seated position in patent foramen ovale?

Anesthetic management of patients presenting for posterior cranial fossa surgery in the seated position includes detection and treatment of venous air embolism. Atrial positioning of a central venous (cv) line may be verified by either X-ray or an atrial ECG tracing. We report a case where a chest X-ray film proved superior. A 26-year-old white female was scheduled for posterior cranial fossa exploration. A cv line was inserted via the left antecubital vein; the chest X-ray film documented correct positioning of the catheter tip within the atrium but an aberrant course of the superior vena cava. Echocardiography was performed in the induction room and indicated a patent foramen ovale. In view of the risk of paradoxical air embolism, surgery was postponed. Subsequent cardiologic and radiologic examinations revealed a patent foramen ovale and a persisting left superior vena cava draining into a dilated coronary sinus. Surgery was rescheduled and carried out uneventfully in the prone position. This case demonstrates: 1) an advantage of a thoracic-X-ray film compared to atrial ECG tracing as not only the catheter tip position, but also the course of the catheter can be identified; and 2) the usefulness of preoperative screening for a patent foramen ovale in patients scheduled for surgery in the seated position.     

Pitfalls of undetected patent foramen ovale in off-pump cases

We describe pitfalls of a hitherto undetected patent foramen ovale during the conduct of an off-bypass coronary revascularization. Manipulation of the heart resulted in right-to-left shunt and severe desaturation requiring institution of cardiopulmonary bypass to close the patent foramen ovale and complete the revascularization.     

Thrombus entrapped in a patent foramen ovale of the atrial septum

A 59-year-old women was referred to our hospital due to severe dyspnea and shock status 12 days after intracranial hematoma evacuation for the hypertensive right putaminal hemorrhage. Transthoracic echocardiography revealed right ventricular dilatation and floating structures in the right atrium. Transesophageal echocardiography demonstrated a large, snake-like structure crossing her foramen ovale of the interatrial septum, and impending paradoxical embolism was diagnosed. She did not receive any anticoagulation and surgery due to recent cerebral hemorrhage. Follow-up TEE showed complete disappearance of the thrombus in the atrium two weeks after the onset. Phlebogram of deep vein demonstrated several thrombus in her leg. She underwent placement of inferior vena cava filter and was discharged from our hospital without any symptom of paradoxical embolism.     

Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography as a screening technique for detection of a patent foramen ovale before surgery in the sitting position

BACKGROUND: Venous air embolism has been reported to occur in 23-45% of patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures in the sitting position. If venous air embolism occurs, a patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a risk factor for paradoxical air embolism and its sequelae. Preoperative screening for a PFO is therefore recommended by some investigators. The reference standard for identifying a PFO is contrast-enhanced transesophageal echocardiography (c-TEE). Contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (c-TCD) and contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiography (c-TTE) are noninvasive alternative methods, but so far there are no studies as to their diagnostic validity in neurosurgical patients. METHODS: The sensitivity and specificity of c-TCD and c-TTE in detecting a PFO were determined in a prospective study using c-TEE as the reference standard. Preoperative c-TCD, c-TTE, and c-TEE studies were performed during the Valsalva maneuver after intravenous echo-contrast medium (D-Galactose, Echovist-300, Schering AG, Berlin, Germany) was administered in 92 consecutive candidates (47 men and 45 women; mean age, 51 yr; range, 25-72 yr) before neurosurgical procedures in the sitting position. RESULTS: A PFO was detected in 24 of the 92 patients (26.0%) using c-TEE. c-TCD correctly identified 22 patients, whereas c-TTE only correctly identified 10. This corresponds to a sensitivity of 0.92 for c-TCD and 0.42 for c-TTE. The negative predictive value was 0.97 for c-TCD compared with 0.83 for c-TTE. The prevalence of a PFO in patients with a posterior fossa lesion was 27%, and in the group with cervical disc herniation was 24% as detected by c-TEE. The incidence of intraoperative venous air embolism was 35% in cases of cervical foraminotomy and 75% in posterior fossa surgery as detected by c-TEE. CONCLUSIONS: c-TCD is a highly sensitive and highly specific method for detecting a PFO. Because c-TCD is noninvasive, it may be more suitable than c-TEE for routine preoperative screening for a PFO. C-TTE is not reliable in detecting a PFO.