Utility of Surgery for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Our aim was to assess the utility of surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) using the number of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) in a retrospective study with cross-sectional quality-of-life (QoL) evaluation. During a 7-year period up to 2002, 242 of 269 (90%) patients with RAAA underwent surgery. Survivors were sent the EQ-5D self-administered questionnaire to assess their long-term outcome. EQ-5D single index values were calculated for each survivor and combined with age- and sex-adjusted Finnish life tables to obtain QALY estimates. Total hospital mortality (90-day) and operative mortality (30-day) were 140 of 269 (52.0%) and 106 of 242 (43.8%), respectively. Of the 129 surviving patients, 111 were available for QoL evaluation. The response rate was 85%. The mean (range) number of QALYs after RAAA was 4.1 (0-30.9) for all and 8.5 (0.2-30.9) for hospital survivors. Young age and low Glasgow Aneurysm Score were associated with a high number of QALYs irrespective of the statistical method used for analysis. Successful repair of RAAA was able to lend considerable benefit as measured by QALYs.     

Health-related quality of life in survivors of open ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a matched, controlled cohort study

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to document the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) for patients who survived operative repair of a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) and to compare this with a matched group of patients who survived elective operative repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (EAAA). METHODS: A matched, controlled cohort study of HRQOL was used to compare patients surviving RAAA with an EAAA control group. The study was conducted at two university-affiliated vascular tertiary care referral centers. Survivors of RAAA and EAAA during an 8.5-year period were identified and followed up. The RAAA and EAAA control patients were matched for age, serum creatinine concentration, gender, and duration of follow-up since surgery. HRQOL was measured with the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36). Scores for the EAAA and RAAA cohorts were also compared with age-corrected SF-36 population scores. RESULTS: Of 267 patients operated for RAAA during the study period, 130 (49%) survived to hospital discharge. Death after discharge was documented in 35 patients, leaving a potential study population of 95 RAAA survivors. Thirteen were lost to follow-up, seven refused to participate, and four patients were not able to participate. The SF-36 was completed by 71 RAAA patients (75% of surviving RAAA patients). The 71 RAAA survivors and 189 EAAA control patients were similar for seven of eight domains of the SF-36: Physical Function, Role-Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Mental Health, and Role-Emotional. There was also no difference in the Physical Health Summary and Mental Health Summary scores. The social function component of the SF-36 demonstrated a statistically significant decline in the EAAA group. Both the EAAA and RAAA SF-36 individual and summary scores compared favorably with population norms that were adjusted only for age. CONCLUSION: Long-term survivors of RAAA enjoy a HRQOL that does not differ significantly from EAAA survivors. Scores for both groups compare favorably with population scores adjusted only for age.     

A meta-analysis of 50 years of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

BACKGROUND: Operative repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) is associated with a high mortality rate but reported figures vary widely. The aim of this study was to estimate the operative mortality of RAAA repair and determine how it has changed over time. METHODS: A meta-analysis of all English language literature quoting figures for operative mortality of RAAA repair. RESULTS: The pooled estimate for the overall operative mortality rate of RAAA repair from 1955 to 1998 was 48 (95 per cent confidence interval 46 to 50) per cent. Meta-regression analysis of operative mortality over time demonstrated a constant reduction of approximately 3.5 per cent per decade (1954-1997) with an operative mortality rate estimate for the year 2000 of 41 per cent. Seventy-seven studies reported intraoperative mortality but, while this appears to have remained constant over time, there was evidence of the presence of publication bias in the subgroup of papers reporting this outcome. There was no evidence of publication bias for the overall operative mortality outcome. CONCLUSION: Contrary to the conclusion of recent studies, this paper demonstrates a gradual reduction with time in the operative mortality rate of RAAA repair.     

Outcome and Quality of Life in Patients Treated for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Single Center Experience

BACKGROUND: Durability of protection and long-term quality of life (QoL) are critical outcome parameters of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. The aim of the present study was to compare results of endovascular and open aneurysm repair (EVAR and OR) with adjusted standard populations, including stratification for urgency of presentation. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of 401 consecutive patients presenting with AAA between January 1998 and December 2002. Cross-sectional follow up was 58 +/- 29 months. Patients were grouped into three cohorts: elective EVAR (n = 68), elective OR (n = 244), and emergency OR (including symptomatic and ruptured AAA, n = 89). Endpoints were perioperative (i.e., 30 days or in-hospital) and late mortality rates, as well as long-term QoL as assessed by the Short Form health survey questionnaire (SF-36). RESULTS: Mean age was lower in the elective OR cohort (66 +/- 10 years) than in the EVAR cohort (72 +/- 7 years; p < .05). Perioperative mortality rates were 4.4%, 0.4%, and 10.1%, for the EVAR, elective OR, and emergency OR cohorts, respectively (p < .05). Corresponding cumulative survival rates after 4 years were 67%, 89%, and 69%, respectively. Long-term QoL SF-36 scores were in all cohorts similar to age- and gender-adjusted standard populations, which score between 85 and 115: 99.6 +/- 35.8 (EVAR), 101.3 +/- 32.4 (elective OR), and 100.4 +/- 36.5 (emergency OR). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term QoL is not permanently impaired after AAA repair, but returns in long-term survivors to what would be expected in a standard population. In this respect, differences were found neither between EVAR and OR, nor between elective and emergency repair. Perioperative mortality rates were highest in patients undergoing emergency OR. The outlook for such patients after the perioperative period, however, was similar to that for patients undergoing elective repair.     

Impact of delay on survival in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm

Rupture of the abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) is a common surgical emergency. Surgical treatment of this condition carries a high morbidity and mortality rate. For successful outcome, an early diagnosis and prompt treatment are essential. However, recently, some centers have reported better results in patients whose surgery had been delayed because of interhospital transfer. Delay in treatment sometimes occurs as patients are transferred from one institution to another where specialized vascular care is available. This retrospective study sought to determine the effect of delay in treatment on the mortality of patients with RAAA repair.The time from arrival at the emergency room to surgery and operative time were obtained from the case notes of 45 consecutive patients with RAAA. Patients' physiology scores on admission were calculated using V-POSSUM for the RAAA model.Thirty-five patients were diagnosed with RAAA in the emergency room and were transferred to surgery. These patients were divided into two groups: patients who had surgery within 1 hour (n = 23) and those in whom surgery was delayed for up to 4 hours (n = 12).There was no significant difference in physiology score between the two groups (p = .12). The time to surgery and operative time with death as the outcome were plotted on a logistic regression model that showed that the delay in surgical treatment increases the mortality rate following RAAA repair (p = .041). Furthermore, a long operative time was associated with a higher surgical mortality rate (p = .029).Delay to surgery and a long operation increase the mortality rate following RAAA repair. However, delay to surgery alone did not influence the mortality rate.     

Long-term survival and late complications after repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms

Purpose:Long-term survival and late vascular complications in patients who survived repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAA) is not well known. The current study compared late outcome after repair of RAAA with those observed in patients who survived elective repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). Methods:The records of 116 patients, 102 men and 14 women (mean age: 72.5 (8.3 years), who survived repair of RAAA (group I) between 1980 to 1989 were reviewed. Late vascular complications and survival were compared with an equal number of survivors of elective AAA repair matched for sex, age, surgeon, and date of operation (group II). Survival was also compared with the age and sex-matched white population of west-north central United States. Results:Late vascular complications occurred in 17% (20/116) of patients in group I and in 8% (9/116) in group II. Paraanastomotic aneurysms occurred more frequently in group I than in group II (17 vs. 8,p = 0.004). At follow-up, 32 patients (28%) were alive in group I (median survival: 9.4 years) and 53 patients (46%) were alive in group II (median survival: 8.7 years). Cumulative survival rates after successful RAAA repair at 1, 5, and 10 years were 86%, 64%, and 33%, respectively. These were significantly lower than survival rates at the same intervals after elective repair (97%, 74%, and 43%, respectively, p = 0.02) or survival of the general population (95%, 75%, and 52%, respectively,p < 0.001). Coronary artery disease was the most frequent cause of late death in both groups. Vascular and graft-related complications caused death in 3% (3/116) in group I and 1% (1/116) in group II. Cox proportional hazards modeling identified age p = 0.0001), cerebrovascular disease p = 0.009), and number of days on mechanical ventilation p = 0.01) to be independent prognostic determinants of late survival in group I. Conclusions:Late vascular complications after repair of RAAA were higher and late survival rates lower than after elective repair. These data support elective repair of AAA. As two-thirds of the patients discharged after repair of RAAA are alive at 5 years, aggressive management of RAAA remains justified. (J Vasc Surg 1998;27:813-20.)     

Quality of life and long-term results after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.

OBJECTIVES: Quality of life as an endpoint of surgery and the long-term prognosis for patients who have survived surgery for a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) is not well-documented. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records of all patients from 1993 to 2000 who underwent resection of RAAA were reviewed. Survival data were calculated from direct contact with the patients or follow-up records. All patients who were alive at the time of our study were invited to participate in follow-up investigations. They received the internationally comparable WHO-QOL-BREF-test. RESULTS: In a period of 7 years, 80 patients underwent surgery for RAAA. The average follow-up time was 5.1 years (1-7.9 years). Our data show that 51% of our patients died within 6 months postoperatively because of the complications of the aortic rupture (in-hospital mortality 39%). Patients who survived the first 6 months after surgery died for the same reasons as the normal population. However, patients who were younger than 75 at the time of RAAA had a higher relative survival rate than a matched sample of the population. There was no significant difference in the quality of life between the study group and the general population. CONCLUSIONS: RAAA survivors had no difference in long-term survival as compared to the general population and also had very few long-term complications. The WHOQOL-BREF-test suggests that the quality of life of survivors of RAAA is similar to the general population.     

The true incidence of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms

The number of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAA) was documented over an 8-year-period in a known population age group. Patient figures were collected from the operative and post-mortem registers in the Worthing Health District. The overall mean incidence of RAAA was 13.9/100,000 patient years, although the incidence was noted to increase from 9.2 to 17.5/100,000 patient years during this period. The incidence in the male population rose from 4.7/100,000 for those in the fifth decade to 184.8/100,000 for those above 80. For patients undergoing operation, the peri-operative survival was 38%, however the overall survival was 11% as 64% of patients died at home. These figures demonstrate an increasing incidence of ruptured AAA. They also add support to the need for screening of asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms and elective repair if the incidence and hence mortality is to be reduced.     

In-hospital operative mortality of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: a population-based analysis of 5593 patients in The Netherlands over a 10-year period.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the operative mortality of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) in The Netherlands. DESIGN: Retrospective population-based study of nation-wide in-hospital mortality of RAAA repair. METHODS: Data were obtained from a national registry for medical diagnosis and procedures. In-hospital mortality of RAAA repair, defined as death during hospital admission irrespective of the cause of death, was determined in the period 1991-2000. Variables of potential influence on in-hospital mortality, including age, gender, date of surgery and hospital type (0-399 beds, > or =400 beds or university hospitals) were studied in a multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The overall in-hospital mortality of RAAA repair in 5593 patients in the 10-year period was 41% (95% confidence interval: 40-42%). In the multivariate analysis, age and hospital type were the most important independent predictors for in-hospital mortality. Gender, year and season of surgery could not be identified as significant risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Over a recent decade, in-hospital mortality of RAAA repair remained unchanged at 41%. Age and hospital class were the most important independent risk factors.     

Adrenal insufficiency in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms

PURPOSE: Failure of the adrenocortical system after open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) has never been reported, to our knowledge. This study was undertaken to examine the incidence and response to treatment of adrenal insufficiency in the RAAA population. METHODS: A 6-year retrospective analysis was carried out on data for all patients admitted after RAAA repair. A cosyntropin stimulation test (CST) was performed in patients with unexplained postoperative hypotension. Patients with adrenal insufficiency were given stress dose hydrocortisone, followed by slow hydrocortisone taper. RESULTS: Twenty of 26 patients admitted after RAAA repair survived longer than 1 week. Nine of these 20 patients underwent CST because of unexplained hypotension, and six patients were found to have adrenal insufficiency. Compared with the three patients with normal CST and the 11 patients with normotension who did not require testing, patients with adrenal insufficiency had greater preoperative hypotension (83% vs 29%; P =.05), greater operative blood loss (7.0 +/- 1.6 L vs 3.0 +/- 0.9 L; P =.003), longer lower extremity ischemia time (5.0 +/- 2.3 hours vs 1.3 +/- 0.5 hours; P =.025), and lower intraoperative urine output (0.8 +/- 0.4 mL/kg/hr vs 2.1 +/- 0.6 mL/kg/hr; P =.023). No difference in length of stay (40 +/- 18 days vs 35 +/- 26 days), major complications (27% vs 32%), or overall mortality (17% vs 15%) was demonstrated with steroid therapy. Initiation of steroid therapy enabled weaning of vasopressor support within 48 hours in patients with adrenal insufficiency. CONCLUSIONS: Adrenal insufficiency was identified in 67% of patients with RAAA with unexplained postoperative hypotension given a CST. Predictors of adrenal insufficiency after RAAA repair include preoperative hypotension and a complicated operative course. Steroid therapy can limit vasopressor dependence, and is not associated with increased morbidity or mortality.     

The influence of gender on outcome after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm

BACKGROUND: The influence of gender on the management of coronary artery disease is well documented, but few reports exist regarding the influence of gender on the management of peripheral arterial disease. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of gender on selection for and short-term and long-term outcomes of repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) in a regional vascular surgery unit. METHODS: Analysis of the prospectively gathered Lothian Surgical Audit database identified 692 patients (542 male and 150 female) admitted with RAAA between January 1, 1983, and December 31, 1995. Case notes were reviewed for patients who were admitted but not operated on. Operative mortality was defined as death within the same hospital admission. Long-term survival data were obtained from the General Register Office (GRO1 records) through record linkage by the Information and Statistics Division of the National Health Service of Scotland. RESULTS: A total of 542 men (78%; median age, 72 years; age range, 46-93 years) and 150 women (22%; median age, 74 years; age range, 55-93 years) were admitted with RAAA (P =.12; Mann-Whitney U test). There was no significant difference in perioperative mortality between men and women. Although women who were not operated on (median age, 81 years; age range, 68-93 years) were significantly (P =.005) older than men who were not operated on (median age, 77 years; age range, 54-93 years), for any given age group, women appeared less likely than men to be offered surgical repair. Long-term survival after successful repair was comparable for the genders. CONCLUSIONS: Gender has no influence on either short-term or long-term outcome for patients undergoing operative repair of RAAA. However, women are less likely to be selected for operation than their male counterparts.     

Outcome in patients requiring renal replacement therapy after surgery for ruptured and non-ruptured aneurysm of the abdominal aorta.

OBJECTIVES: to study the course of postoperative acute renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) in patients with ruptured (RAAA) and non-ruptured (EAAA) aneurysm of the abdominal aorta (AAA) and to investigate the predictive value regarding outcome of parameters collected during the illness. DESIGN: retrospective study in a university hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: the records of 42 patients, 21 with RAAA and 21 with EAAA, were reviewed. RESULTS: overall mortality was 69%, 71% for RAAA patients and 66% for EAAA patients. RRT was started 9 (2-28) days - median (range) - postoperatively and continued during 9 (2-50) days. Renal function recovered in nine of the 13 survivors after 18 (2-50) days. Length of ICU stay was 50 (2-132) days for survivors vs. 19 (6-56) days for non-survivors. The systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) or need for vasoactive support was associated with poor outcome and the ability to wean from vasoactive or ventilatory support with improved outcome. CONCLUSIONS: RAAA and EAAA patients requiring postoperative RRT both had a high mortality. The ICU stay of non-survivors was shorter than that of survivors, who had a 75% chance of regaining renal function. The ability to wean from ventilatory and inotropic support may be of help in the clinical management of patients requiring RRT after AAA surgery.     

Quality-of-life after total pancreatectomy: Is it really that bad on long-term follow-up?

While selected pancreatic diseases may be best treated by total pancreatectomy (TP), the anticipated sequelae of pancreatic insufficiency make TP an undesirable alternative. Our aim was to determine if patients undergoing TP have a worse quality of life (QoL) than age- and gender-matched controls and poor long-term glycemic control. Ninety-nine patients undergoing TP from 1985 through 2002 were identified. The 34 survivors with no recurrent malignancy were surveyed with the Short Form-36 (SF-36), the Audit of Diabetes Dependent QoL (ADD QoL), the European Organization for Research and Treatment in Cancer Pancreas 26 (EORTC PAN 26), and our institutional questionnaire. Operative morbidity and mortality were 32% and 5%, respectively. Three late postoperative deaths (3%) were attributed to hypoglycemia. Of the 34 surviving patients, 27 (79%) agreed to participate at a mean of 7.5 years postoperatively. Seven patients had required 12 hospitalizations for poor glycemic control. Per the SF-36, two domains (role physical and general health) were decreased compared with an age- and gendermatched national population (P<.05). The ADD QoL demonstrated an overall decrease in QoL related specifically to the diabetes mellitus (P < .01), but comparison with insulin-dependent diabetics from other causes showed no significant difference in QoL. The EORTC PAN 26 instrument also showed measurable effects on QoL. Total pancreatectomy can be performed safely. QoL after TP is decreased compared with age- and gender-matched controls but not with diabetes from other causes; however, the changes are not overwhelming. TP should remain a viable option but in selected patients. Presented at the Forty-Sixth Annual Meeting of The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Chicago, Illinois, May 14–18, 2005 (oral presentation).     

Endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: experience in a community hospital

The endovascular technique has been recently used as an alternative procedure for selected patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) as a result of the potential for decreasing morbidity, mortality, and recovery time. We examined our institution's results with endovascular repair of RAAA. Between July 2005 and April 2006, four patients underwent endovascular repair of infrarenal RAAA. We performed a retrospective analysis of our comorbidities, operation time, length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, morbidity and mortality, blood transfusions, and secondary interventions on these patients at our institution. The median age was 73.2 years (range, 66-82 years); 75 per cent were male and 25 per cent were female. Mean operating time was 90 minutes. We had no operative or postoperative mortalities. Five complications occurred in three patients. These included acute renal failure, common femoral artery intimal dissection, graft thrombosis of the iliac limb, ischemic colitis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation. Endovascular repair of RAAA by an endovascular team is feasible in the community hospital setting. Our limited number of patients in this study does not allow us to compare it directly with results from the standard open procedure. A larger, multicenter study may eventually show this method to be helpful in patients who require repair of RAAA.     

Community and hospital outcome from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm within the catchment area of a regional vascular surgical service.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine patterns of referral, management, and outcome of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) within the catchment area of this regional vascular unit (RVU). METHODS: Referral, management, and outcome data regarding 972 consecutive patients admitted to the hospital or certified deceased in the community because of RAAA between January 1, 1989, and December 31, 1995, were retrieved from prospectively gathered computerized national and local databases. RESULTS: Of 381 (39.2%) patients admitted to this unit, 316 (82.9%) underwent surgery, and of those, 188 (59.5%) survived. There was no significant difference in overall mortality between patients who were admitted directly to this unit (152 of 310, 49%) and those who were transferred from elsewhere (41 of 71, 58%). Surgical patients traveled significantly farther to the RVU than nonsurgical patients (P <.001), but there was no significant difference in traveling distance between surgical patients who survived and those who did not. Of 372 (38%) patients who were admitted to other units and not transferred, 24 (6.4%) underwent surgery and 14 (3.8%) survived. Of 972 patients, the overall community mortality from RAAA was 770 (79%). CONCLUSION: Transferring patients from outlying units did not appear to prejudice operative outcome in this RVU. However, less than half of all RAAA patients were transferred, and only a small minority of those not transferred underwent surgery. Although the overall community mortality from RAAA was similar to that reported in earlier studies from other regions and countries where centralization has not occurred, centralization of vascular surgical services may be associated with an inappropriately low operation and survival rate for those patients who are not transferred to the regional center. The effect of centralization on the community outcome of emergent vascular surgical conditions requires further investigation.     

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in a well-defined geographic area

OBJECTIVE: Despite an increasing number of elective operations on abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), the age- and sex-standardized mortality rate of ruptured AAA (RAAA) continues to increase. In the Pirkanmaa region, population 440,000, all aortic surgery is performed at Tampere University Hospital (TAUH). Procedures have been collected into the vascular registry. The purpose of this study was (1) to establish the incidence, modes of treatment, and mortality of RAAA in a defined geographic area; (2) to evaluate the prerupture history to determine if there are any ways to prevent rupture; and to make a forecast about the increase of RAAAs in the next decades. METHODS: Population and outcome data in the Pirkanmaa region and information on all patients who died of RAAA during 1990-1997 were provided by Statistics Finland. All operated RAAAs that underwent procedures during 1990 to 1999 were identified from the local vascular registry. To make a forecast for the next decades, an incidence of RAAA was calculated separately for each age group in 5-year intervals. RESULTS: From 1990 to 1997, 221 patients presented with RAAA. The mean incidence was 6.3/100,000 inhabitants. The incidence in the population over 65 years was 35.5/100,000. The total RAAA mortality was 76.9%. A total of 139 patients reached TAUH and 111 underwent emergency surgery. The overall hospital mortality in TAUH was 63.3%. The calculated annual number of RAAA will increase 49.6% in the next 2 decades, and the overall incidence will increase from 6.3 to 8.9/100,000 inhabitants. According to the vascular registry, 166 patients were operated on for RAAA during 1990 to 1999 in TAUH. The 30-day mortality was 50.6%. A minority of the patients (n = 18, 10.8%) had a previously documented AAA. The median diameter at the time of rupture was 7 cm. Seven (5.0%) men and six (24.0%) women had a diameter of less than 5.5 cm. CONCLUSION: The incidence of RAAA in the Pirkanmaa region in 1990s was the Finnish average. In the next two decades, the number of individuals with RAAA will increase significantly. One quarter of women had a diameter of AAA at the time of rupture that was under the current threshold indicator for elective operation.     

The effect of patient transfer on outcomes after rupture of an abdominal aortic aneurysm

OBJECTIVE: Centralization of vascular surgery services has resulted in patients being transferred longer distances for treatment of life-threatening conditions. The purpose of this study was to determine whether patient transfer adversely affects the survival of people with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA). METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all patients undergoing attempted repair of an RAAA at our centre, over a recent 3.5-year period (August 2000-December 2003). Patients were divided into those presenting directly to our centre and those transferred from another hospital. The main outcome variable was in-hospital or 30-day mortality, with secondary variables including time to surgical treatment, mortality in the first 24 hours and length of hospitalization. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients (73% men) underwent attempted open repair of an RAAA at our centre during this period. Twenty-four patients (29.6%) presented directly to our hospital, while 57 (70.4%) were transferred from another institution. The overall mortality rate was 53%. Although transferred patients took twice as long as direct patients to get to the operating room (6.3 v. 3.2 h, p=0.03), there was no difference in mortality between the 2 groups (50% v. 54%, p=ns). However, deaths of transferred patients were more likely to occur in the first 24 postoperative hours, compared with direct patients (40% v. 33%, p<0.05). Neither mean intensive care unit stay (5.8 and 8.1 d) nor total hospitalization (20.9 and 18.8 d) differed between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although the transfer of patients with RAAA results in a treatment delay, it does not adversely affect the already high mortality rates associated with this condition. These results may be attributed to a preselection of patients who are able to tolerate such a delay.     

Functional outcome after open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm

BACKGROUND: Outcome after operative repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has traditionally been assessed in terms of survival. This study examines the functional outcome of patients who survive operation. METHODS: Consecutive patients who survived open repair over an 18-month period were entered into a prospective case-control study. Age- and sex-matched controls were identified from patients undergoing elective AAA repair. The Short Form-36 health survey was administered to both groups of patients at 6 months after operation. Results were compared with the expected scores for an age- and sex-matched normal UK population. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients underwent open repair of a ruptured AAA, and 30 survived; no patient was lost to follow-up. There were no significant differences in quality of life between patients who had an emergency repair and those who had an elective repair. Both of these groups had poorer health-related quality of life outcomes than the matched normal population. Surprisingly, compared with the normal population, patients after elective repair had poorer outcomes in more health domains than patients who survived emergency operation. CONCLUSIONS: Survivors of ruptured AAA repair have a good functional outcome within 6 months of operation.     

Outcomes of endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms

INTRODUCTION: The successful application of endovascular techniques for the elective repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) has stimulated a strong interest in their possible use in dealing with a long-standing surgical challenge: the ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA). The use of a conventional open procedure to repair ruptured aneurysms is associated with a high operative mortality of 45% to 50%. In this study, we evaluated the current frequency of endovascular repair of RAAAs in four large states and the impact of this technique on patient outcome. METHODS: We examined discharge data sets from 2000 through 2003 from the four states of California, Florida, New Jersey, and New York, whose combined population represents almost a third of the United States population. Proportions and trends were analyzed by chi2 analysis and continuous variables by the Student's t test. RESULTS: We found that since the year 2000, endovascular repair has begun to emerge as a viable treatment option for RAAAs, accounting for the repair of 6.2% of cases in 2003. During the same period, the use of open procedures for RAAAs declined. The overall mortality rate for the 4-year period was significantly lower for endovascular vs open repair (39.3% vs. 47.7%, P = .005). Moreover, compared with open repair, endovascular repair resulted in a significantly lower rate of pulmonary, renal, and bleeding complications. Survival after endovascular repair correlated with hospital experience, as assessed by the overall volume of elective and nonelective endovascular procedures. For endovascular repairs, mortality ranged from 45.9% for small volume hospitals to 26% for large volume hospitals (P = .0011). Volume was also a determinant of mortality for open repairs, albeit to a much lesser extent (51.5% for small volume hospitals, 44.3% for large volume hospitals; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: We observed a benefit to using endovascular procedures for RAAAs in institutions with significant endovascular experience; however, the analysis of administrative data cannot rule out selection bias as an explanation of better outcomes. These data strongly endorse the need for prospective studies to clarify to what extent the improved survival in RAAA patients is to be attributed to the endovascular approach rather than the selection of low-risk patients.     

Contemporary results of open repair of ruptured abdominal aortoiliac aneurysms: effect of surgeon volume on mortality

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate contemporary results of ruptured aortoiliac aneurysms (RAAA) and identify the role of surgeons' annual aortic volume and other prognostic indicators for early outcome. METHODS: A retrospective review identified 213 consecutive patients who presented with an atherosclerotic RAAA without thoracic extension over 6.5 years ending in June 2007. Excluded were 31 ruptures treated by endovascular repair (EVAR) or following previous EVAR, also excluded were two chronic asymptomatic hemodynamically stable ruptures. Ten patients were not treated due to either patient's refusal or prohibitive surgical risk. Demographic, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were collected. Log rank test and Cox proportional hazard model analyses were utilized to identify factors contributing to mortality and morbidity in these patients. Survival rates were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-one males and 39 females with a mean age of 74.5 +/- 8.1 years underwent consecutive RAAA repairs. The operative mortality rate was 38.2% (65/170), including 29 intraoperative deaths. Using multivariate analysis, surgeon's average annual AAA volume (<20/y), advanced age, and postoperative intestinal ischemia were independent predictors of perioperative deaths. Shock on presentation, preoperative cardiopulmonary resuscitation or free rupture were not. High-volume surgeons (>20 average annual AAA cases/y) had a higher 30-day survival rates (78.4% vs 57.9%, P = .024). Octogenarians had a lower 30-day survival rate of 49.0% vs 70.5% (P = .012). Patients who developed postoperative intestinal ischemia had a lower 30-day survival rate compared with patients without (48.1% vs 15.3%, P = .002). Increased intraoperative fluid and blood product usage was associated with bowel ischemia (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: RAAA remains a highly lethal problem. The improved early outcomes of surgeons with high-volume AAA have strong implications for training, emergency staffing needs and alternative treatment strategies.