Clinical significance of serum tumour M2-PK and CA19-9 detection in the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma

Background/aimsTo investigate the clinical significance of serum Tu M2-PK and CA19-9 detection in the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma.MethodsThe tumour markers (Tu M2-PK and CA19-9) in 115 patients with cholangiocarcinoma, 85 patients with benign disease and 120 blood donors were detected by ELISA.ResultsThe levels of serum Tu M2-PK and CA19-9 were markedly higher in the patients with cholangiocarcinoma than in controls (P < 0.05). Tu M2-PK showed more sensitivity (84.2%) and specificity (90%) than CA19-9 (68.4%) and (75%).ConclusionsTu M2-PK may be used as a valuable diagnosis marker in cholangiocarcinoma.     

肿瘤标志物、K-ras和p53突变对胰腺癌诊断的价值

目的评价血清肿瘤标志物CA19-9、CA242、CA50、癌胚抗原和粪便K-ras以及p53基因突变对胰腺癌诊断的价值。方法收集2002年2月至2004年3月在北京协和医院、中国医学科学院肿瘤医院和沈阳军区总医院确诊的新发胰腺癌患者136例,良性消化系统疾病患者240例,进行血清肿瘤标志物和粪便K-ras、p53基因突变的检测。根据结果绘制不同检测方法的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,计算ROC曲线下面积,并确定最佳阳性分界值。结果血清CA19-9和CA242的ROC曲线下面积分别为0·855±0·031(95%可信区间0·794~0·916)和0·859±0·031(95%可信区间0·799~0·920),最佳阳性分界值分别为68U/ml和25U/ml,其诊断胰腺癌的敏感性分别为84·4%(98/116)和88·4%(84/95),特异性分别为84·3%(145/172)和79·1%(144/182)。粪便K-ras和p53基因突变诊断胰腺癌的敏感性分别为77·8%和27·8%,特异性分别为82·2%和95·2%。将粪便K-ras和p53基因突变与血清CA19-9和CA242测定相结合计算胰腺癌诊断评分,绘制有序分类资料的ROC曲线,其曲线下面积为0·946±0·017(95%可信区间0·912~0·980),最佳阳性分界值为2分。结论血清CA19-9及CA242对胰腺癌诊断具有相似价值;联合粪便K-ras及p53突变的检测,通过胰腺癌可能性积分,可以显著提高胰腺癌的诊断效率。     

The diagnostic importance of CEA and CA 19-9 for the early diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma

BACKGROUND/AIMS: CA 19-9 and CEA were evaluated for their specificity and sensitivity in the early diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma. METHODOLOGY: This prospective study included 40 patients with pancreatic carcinoma. A control group of 60 patients were divided into two subgroups as upper gastrointestinal system malignancies and benign pancreatic disorders. CEA and CA 19-9 levels were measured in all the patients. RESULTS: When the reference value of CA 19-9 was accepted as 74 U/mL, the specificity was 100% when pancreatic carcinoma was compared with benign disorders of the pancreas, but it's specificity for upper gastrointestinal malignancies was 60-90%. When the reference value of CEA was increased, the sensitivity had been decreased but the specificity had been increased when compared with the control group. If the reference value of CEA was accepted as 5 ng/mL, the specificity was 100% when pancreatic carcinoma was compared with acute or chronic pancreatitis, but it is less specific for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma from the upper gastrointestinal malignancies. CONCLUSIONS: With the progression of the pancreatic carcinoma, serum CEA level and the specificity of CEA were elevated similar to that of CA 19-9. However, the elevation of CEA specificity when compared with the control group was lower than the specificity of the CA 19-9 and the sensitivity of CA 19-9 was superior to that of CEA for pancreatic carcinoma. The level of CA 19-9 was increased with the development of early pancreatic cancer and this elevation steadily continued with the progression of the cancer.     

M2型丙酮酸激酶及癌胚抗原的联合检测在肺癌诊断中的价值

目的：探讨联合检测肿瘤M2型丙酮酸激酶（Tumor M2-Pyruvate Kinase,Tu M2-PK）、癌胚抗原（carcinoembbryonic antigen,CEA）对肺癌的诊断价值。方法：检测48例肺癌患者、31例肺良性病变和30例健康人血浆TU M2-PK及血清CEA值．并进行对比分析。结果：肺癌组Tu M2-PK、CEA值显著高于肺良性病变组和正常对照组（P〈0．05）。肺癌组各病理类型之间Tu M2-PK无显著差异,腺癌患者CEA值明显高于鳞癌与小细胞肺癌（P〈0．05）。Ⅲ、Ⅳ期肺癌患者血浆中TuM2-PK水平显著高于Ⅰ、Ⅱ期（P〈0．05）。单独检测TuM2—PK对肺癌的敏感度为65％,联合CEA检测时敏感度达到83％。结论：肺癌患者血浆中TuM2—PK明显升高,联合检测TuM2-PK、CEA可提高肺癌的诊断水平。     

A clinical evaluation of monoclonal (CA19-9, CA50, CA12-5) and polyclonal (CEA, TPA) antibody-defined antigens for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer

We measured in 193 patients, admitted to our wards for symptoms and signs suggestive of pancreatic or digestive malignancy, the serum levels of five tumor-associated antigens (CA 19-9, CA 50, CA 125, TPA, CEA) and we evaluated their diagnostic accuracy both when used alone and in combination. For CA 19-9 and CA 50 a sensitivity for pancreatic cancer as high as 92 and 88%, respectively, and specificity of 91.8% were found. A lower sensitivity vs. pancreatic cancer was found for the other tumor markers, and vs. the other digestive and nondigestive malignancies for all tumor markers (apart for CA 19-9 and CA 50 vs. biliary carcinomas). As for the combined assays, the best figures were found vs. pancreatic cancer for CA 19-9 plus CA 50, CA 50 plus CEA, CA 50 plus CA 125; a sensitivity by far worse vs. the other gastrointestinal cancers was found for all the possible combinations. We conclude that in selected symptomatic patients some tumor-marker determinations can be useful in identifying those with a high probability of harboring a pancreatic cancer, to be further studied or operated upon. The clinical relevance of this in patients already symptomatic is at present unclear.     

Carbohydrate antigenic determinant (CA 19-9) and other tumor markers in gastrointestinal malignancies

The serum carbohydrate antigenic determinant (CA 19-9) was assayed in patients with various diseases, and it provides excellent sensitivity for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (25/27, 93%), while only 4% (2/54) of the patients with benign diseases and none of the 40 healthy subjects showed elevated CA 19-9 concentrations over 37 units/ml as upper normal value. Increased serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels over 2.5 ng/ml were observed in patients with pancreatic cancer (18/22, 82%), compared to 22% (12/54) of the patients with benign diseases and 10% (4/40) of the healthy subjects. 12 of the 19, 6 of the 19 and none of the 22 patients with pancreatic cancer exhibited high serum ferritin, beta 2-microglobulin, or alpha-fetoprotein levels, respectively. A significant difference in CA 19-9 was found between patients with pancreatic cancer and gastric cancer, other gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies, other non-GI malignancies, benign digestive diseases or normal populations.     

Tumour markers CA 19-9 and CA 50 in digestive tract malignancies.

CA 19-9 and CA 50 are tumour marker tests measuring the same carbohydrate structure, sialosyl-fucosyl-lactotetraose--that is, the sialylated Lewis blood group antigen. In addition, the C50 antibody reacts with sialosyl-lactotetraose, which may be expressed in small amounts in some carcinomas. In this study we compared these tests in sera from patients with benign and malignant digestive tract diseases. The sensitivity of the markers for different cancers was also compared at several specificity levels with patients with benign diseases as reference groups. Both markers showed a high sensitivity for pancreatic cancer (77% for CA 19-9; 69% for CA 50) and biliary cancer (88%). The figures in colorectal cancer were almost as high as those reported for CEA; 16-21% elevated values in Dukes A and B tumours and 44-47% in Dukes C and D tumours. The sensitivity for gastric cancer was 48% for both markers. CA 50 had a higher sensitivity for liver cancer (55%) than CA 19-9 (9%), but the proportion of elevated values in benign liver diseases was also higher (33% versus 15%, respectively). Overall, there was good correlation between the CA 19-9 and CA 50 levels, and the difference in sensitivity and specificity was marginal. In clinical practice the greatest value of CA 19-9 and CA 50 is in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.     

Assay of serum elastase 1 in adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: diagnostic value, compared and combined study with serum CEA and CA 19-9

Serum elastase 1, CEA and, CA 19-9 titers were determined by radioimmunoassay in 113 patients with benign non pancreatic digestive disease, 88 patients with non pancreatic carcinoma, 25 patients with chronic pancreatitis and 40 patients with pancreatic carcinoma (of whom 34 were classified according to Fortner's staging classification), respectively: a) to evaluate the diagnostic value of elastase in pancreatic carcinoma, b) to compare and to study the value of its association with CEA and CA 19-9 for earlier detection of this type of cancer. The specificity of serum elastase (greater than 500 ng/dl) was greater than that of CA 19-9 (greater than 37 U/ml), (93.3 p. 100 vs 64.6 p. 100, p less than 0.01), but its sensitivity was significantly lower than that of CA 19-9 (27.5 p. 100 vs 82.5 p. 100; p less than 0.001). The sensitivity of CA 19-9 (greater than 37 U/ml) and/or elastase (greater than 500 ng/dl) was 85.2 p. 100 (greater, but not significantly, than CA 19-9 alone) and 91.6 p. 100 in Fortner stage I or II tumors (greater, but not significantly, than Fortner stage III tumors which were at 83.6 p. 100). The specificity of the combined test was 62 p. 100, lower (but not significantly) than CA 19-9 alone. As serum CEA (greater than 5 ng/ml) alone and in association with CA 19-9 was disappointing, it might be replaced by the elastase assay. The combined CA 19-9-elastase assay coupled with morphologic investigations could represent an attractive approach for earlier detection of this cancer.     

肿瘤标志物CA242与CA19-9对胰腺癌的诊断价值

目的:比较血清肿瘤标志物CA242与CA19-9对胰腺癌的诊断价值。方法:1996年4月至1997年6月,北京医院对门诊及住院197例患者进行了血清CA19-9的检测,148例进行了CA242的检测,其中25例为临床明确诊断为胰腺癌,12例为急性胰腺炎,18例为良性阻塞性黄疸。结果显示:胰腺癌患者血清CA19-9和CA242较对照明显增高,其中25例胰腺癌患者有21例CA19-9阳性,检测的灵敏度为84％,特异性为74.4％,有17例CA242阳性,检测的灵敏度为68％,特异性为87.8％。CA242与CA19-9比较,灵敏度无显著差异(0.10相似文献   

New tumor-associated antigen SC6 in pancreatic cancer

AIM: To examine the concentration of a new antigen SC6 (SC6-Ag) recognized by monoclonal antibody (MAb) in patients with pancreatic cancer and other malignant or benign diseases and to understand whether SC6-Ag has any clinical significance in distinguishing pancreatic cancer from other gastrointestinal diseases. METHODS: Six hundred and ninety-five serum specimens obtained from 115 patients with pancreatic cancer, 154 patients with digestive cancer and 95 patients with non-digestive cancer were used and classified in this study. Serum specimens obtained from 140 patients with benign digestive disease and 89 patients with non-benign digestive disease served as controls. Ascites was tapped from 16 pancreatic cancer patients, 19 hepatic cancer patients, 16 colonic cancer patients, 10 gastric cancer and 6 severe necrotic pancreatitis patients. The samples were quantitated by solid-phase radioimmunoassay. The cut-off values (CV) of 41, 80, and 118 U/mL were used. RESULTS: The average intra- and interassay CV detected by immunoradiometric assay of SC6-Ag was 5.4% and 8.7%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity were 73.0% and 90.9% respectively. The levels in most malignant and benign cases were within the normal upper limit. Among the 16 pancreatic cancer cases, the concentration of SC6-Ag in ascites was over the normal range in 93.8% patients. There was no significant difference in the concentration of SC6-Ag. Decreased expression of SC6-Ag in sera was significantly related to tumor differentiation. The concentration of SC6-Ag was higher in patients before surgery than after surgery. The specificity of SC6-Ag and CA19-9 was significantly higher than that of ultrasound and computer tomography (CT) in pancreatic cancer patients. Higher positive predictive values were indicated in 92.3% SC6-Ag and 88.5% CA19-9, but lower in 73.8% ultrasound and 76.2% CT. CONCLUSION: The combined test of SC6-Ag and CA19-9 may improve the diagnostic rate of primary cancer. The detection of SC6-Ag is valuable in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer before and after surgery.     

Novel serum tumor marker, RCASl, in pancreatic diseases

AIM: As tumor markers for pancreatic carcinoma, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 have been used, but the sensitivity and specificity are not enough for the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma. METHODS: A novel serum tumor marker, RCAS1, was compared with two conventional serum tumor markers, CEA (highly specific for pancreatic cancer) and CA 19-9 (highly sensitive for pancreatic cancer), in 48 patients with pancreatic exocrine tumors. RESULTS: When the diagnosis of benign or malignant conditions was examined by one tumor marker, the sensitivity of RCAS1 alone (55%) was higher than that of CEA alone (27%) and the specificity of RCAS1 alone (92%) was greater than that of CA19-9 alone (78%). When examined by a combination of two markers, the sensitivity of a combination of RCAS1 and CA19-9 (95%) was superior to those of CA19-9 alone (78%), RCAS1 alone (55%, P = 0.002), CEA alone (27%) (P<0.001), RCAS1 and CEA (59%) and CA19-9 and CEA (82%). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the combination of RCAS1 and CA19-9 is highly sensitive for pancreatic carcinoma.     

Novel serum tumor marker, RCAS1, in pancreatic diseases

AIM: As tumor markers for pancreatic carcinoma, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 have been used, but the sensitivity and specificity are not enough for the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma. METHODS: A novel serum tumor marker, RCAS1, was compared with two conventional serum tumor markers, CEA (highly specific for pancreatic cancer) and CA 19-9 (highly sensitive for pancreatic cancer), in 48 patients with pancreatic exocrine tumors. RESULTS: When the diagnosis of benign or malignant conditions was examined by one tumor marker, the sensitivity of RCAS1 alone (55%) was higher than that of CEA alone (27%) and the specificity of RCAS1 alone (92%) was greater than that of CA19-9 alone (78%). When examined by a combination of two markers, the sensitivity of a combination of RCAS1 and CA19-9 (95%) was superior to those of CA19-9 alone (78%), RCAS1 alone (55%, P = 0.002), CEA alone (27%) (P<0.001), RCAS1 and CEA (59%) and CA19-9 and CEA (82%). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the combination of RCAS1 and CA19-9 is highly sensitive for pancreatic carcinoma.     

Detection of pancreatic cancer with normal carbohydrate antigen 19-9 using protein chip technology

AIM: To develop a method to differentiate pancreatic cancer patients from healthy or benign individuals when carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 is normal.METHODS: Forty-one serum samples from patients with pancreatic lesions and blood samples from 20 healthy individuals were collected at the first stage of the experiment according to the enrolment criteria. General characteristics and some clinical features were carefully compared to ensure that the results were reasonable. All the blood samples were analyzed by surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF-MS) combined with CM10 chips and a related bioinformatics analysis program to generate diagnostic models with different proteins. Forty-seven consecutive samples were tested at the next stage to verify the veracity and efficiency of the models.RESULTS: The sex, age, and serum CA19-9 levels among the three groups (malignant, benign, and healthy) were statistically matched (P values were 0.957, 0.145, and 0.382, respectively). Two patterns were generated. Pattern 1 with four proteins theoretically had a specificity and sensitivity of 100% in distinguishing pancreatic cancer from healthy individuals, while it was 86.7% and 86.4%, respectively, in the subsequent practical verification. The positive predictive value (PPV) of the model was 86.4%. One of the four proteins was expressed highly in pancreatic cancer while the other three were expressed weakly. Pattern 2 consisted of six proteins that showed a specificity of 70.0% and sensitivity of 77.3% for differentiating malignancy from benign tumors. Its PPV reached 85.0%. Only one of these six proteins showed high expression in the malignant group.CONCLUSION: SELDI-TOF-MS may facilitate diagnosis or differential diagnosis of pancreatic cancer when CA19-9 is normal. Pattern 1 may serve as a useful screening tool.     

Significance of serum receptor-binding cancer antigen (RCAS1) in pancreatic cancer and benign pancreatobiliary diseases.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: RCAS1 is a novel tumor marker, and there are no sufficient data about the utility of this antigen as a serum tumor marker and about its tumor specificity. We aimed at measuring the serum levels of RCAS1 in patients with pancreatic cancer and at determining its diagnostic efficacy. METHODS: Sera collected from patients with pancreas adenocarcinomas (39 cases) and benign biliary and pancreatic diseases (19 cases) and from healthy volunteers (13 cases) were analyzed for RCAS1 and the results compared with CA19-9. The relation between serum RCAS1 and tumor stage was also evaluated. RESULTS: The serum RCAS1 levels exceeded the normal limit in 92.3, 26.3, and 23.0% of the patients with pancreatic cancer and benign biliary and pancreatic diseases and healthy volunteers, respectively. RCAS1 had a specificity similar to that of CA19-9 in pancreatic cancer, whereas RCAS1 had a higher sensitivity (p < 0.05). Both tumor markers had similar predictive values of positive and negative tests for pancreatic cancer. The RCAS1 level was less influenced than the CA19-9 level by biliary stenoses. The median serum levels of RCAS1 increased, as the tumor stage increased. CONCLUSIONS: RCAS1 is a valuable serum marker for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. The RCAS1 and CA19-9 levels increase the diagnostic efficiency of each other in pancreatic cancer.     

A new strategy for the application of CA19-9 in the differentiation of pancreaticobiliary cancer: analysis using a receiver operating characteristic curve

OBJECTIVE: Clinicians might be misled in interpreting an elevated CA19-9 when differentiating pancreaticobiliary cancer from benign clinical conditions such as acute cholangitis or cholestasis, because in these conditions, the concentration of CA19-9 may also be elevated. The aims of our study were to calculate new individual cutoff values for CA19-9 according to clinical situations using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and to define a new strategy for interpreting CA19-9 in pancreaticobiliary cancer. METHODS: One hundred sixty patients with pancreatic diseases (cancer 90, benign disease 70), 322 patients with biliary tract diseases (biliary cancer 152, benign disease 170), and 20,035 asymptomatic controls were enrolled in the present study. An ROC curve was described by plotting the sensitivity on the y-axis against 1-specificity on the x-axis for each of several cutoff values. RESULTS: The area under the ROC curve was significantly greater for pancreatic cancer than for biliary cancer (p < 0.05). For patients with pancreatic cancer, CA19-9 proved to be useful. At a cutoff value of 37 U/ml, sensitivity and specificity were 76.7% and 87.1%, respectively. For patients with biliary cancer, CA19-9 was not helpful. However, when patients with biliary disease were divided into two groups according to the presence of cholangitis or cholestasis, CA19-9 proved to be more useful for the group without cholangitis or cholestasis than for the group with cholangitis or cholestasis (p < 0.05). In the former group, the sensitivity and specificity of CA19-9 were 77.6% and 83%, respectively, at the cutoff value of 37 U/ml. For the latter group, the sensitivity and specificity of CA19-9 were 74% and 41.5% respectively, whereas the specificity reached 87% at 300 U/ml. CA19-9 in diagnosing pancreatic cancer was useful regardless of accompanying acute pancreatitis or cholestasis. The serum concentration of CA19-9 in asymptomatic individuals was 9.42 +/- 9.95 U/ml. Only 1 of 157 patients with a concentration of CA19-9 above 37 U/ml was found to have gallbladder cancer. The positive and negative predictive values were 0.65% and 0.78%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The use of CA19-9 for the differentiation of pancreaticobiliary cancer should be applied individually, depending on the clinical situation.     

Low efficacy of serum levels of CA 19-9 in prediction of malignant diseases in asymptomatic population in Taiwan

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Serum levels of carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 have long been employed as a biomarker in diagnosing pancreatic cancer in symptomatic patients. We assessed the clinical usefulness of serum CA 19-9 in screening pancreatic cancer and other malignancies in individuals without symptoms. METHODOLOGY: The study enrolled 5,343 consecutive asymptomatic individuals who completed a health check-up comprising serum CA 19-9, chest film, abdominal ultrasonography, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy. The sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive rate of CA 19-9 in detecting cancers were analyzed. RESULTS: There were 385 patients (7.2%) with CA 19-9 higher than 37 U/mL. Two patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer had CA 19-9 levels of 46,885 U/mL and 88.4 U/mL, respectively. Thirteen among 58 patients with other cancers had CA 19-9 levels higher than 37 U/mL. If the cut-off value of CA 19-9 was set at 37 U/mL, the sensitivity and specificity for pancreatic cancer and other cancers were 100% and 92.8%, as well as 22.4% and 92.9%, respectively. However, the positive predictive rates for pancreatic cancer and other cancers were as low as 0.5% and 3.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy of CA 19-9 in predicting either pancreatic cancer or other cancers in the asymptomatic population is low.     

Comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of the CA19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen assays in detecting cancer of the pancreas

In this study, we determined the sensitivity and specificity of the new serum assay CA19-9 in detecting adenocarcinoma of the pancreas and compared the results with those of the serum assay to carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). Thirty-seven patients with biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma (14 patients with resectable disease and 23 patients with unresectable disease) were compared with 157 controls (48 patients with benign pancreatic disease, 34 patients with nonpancreatic sources of abdominal pain, 58 patients with benign jaundice, 7 patients with nonpancreatic malabsorption, and 10 patients with renal failure on dialysis). It was determined that a cutoff of 75 U/ml enhanced the diagnostic efficiency (sensitivity + specificity) of CA19-9 over the manufacturer's recommended cutoff of 37 U/ml. The sensitivity of CA19-9 (greater than 75 U/ml) in detecting cancer was greater than that of CEA (greater than 5 ng/ml) (86.5% vs. 48.4%) (p less than 0.01, McNemar test). The sensitivity of CA19-9 was 78.6% in resectable and 91.3% in unresectable disease. The specificity of CA19-9 was also greater than CEA (92.5% vs. 87.3%), although this difference was not statistically significant. The higher the CA19-9 or CEA level, the greater the specificity of either assay; at CA19-9 levels greater than 600 U/ml and CEA levels greater than 20 ng/ml the specificity is approximately 99%. The combination of an elevated CA19-9 level (greater than 75 U/ml) and an elevated CEA level (greater than 5 ng/ml) also enhanced specificity to 99%. It is concluded that CA19-9 used alone is superior to CEA used alone in detecting cancer of the pancreas and that the combination of mild elevations of both assays improves their specificity. Although the CA19-9 marker can be elevated with other intraabdominal adenocarcinomas (e.g., gastric, biliary, or colonic), CA19-9, together with CEA, will be useful to the clinician in differentiating benign from malignant pancreatic processes and in alerting the clinician to the possible presence of an intraabdominal neoplasm in the proper clinical setting.     

Clinical evaluation of serum sialyl SSEA-1 (SLX) in diagnosis of cancers

In order to evaluate the usefulness of sialyl SSEA-1 (SLX) as a tumor marker of digestive cancers, serum levels of the antigen were determined in 334 patients with malignancies and 196 patients with benign diseases. The results indicated that positivity of the antigen in sera from malignant patients was highest in pancreatic cancer (58%) and biliary tract cancer (56%). False positive incidence of SLX in sera from benign diseases was as low as 6%, revealing low false positivity. Comparison with other tumor markers such as CA19-9, CA-50, CEA and ST-439 showed that positivity of SLX was as high as that of CEA, whereas it was lower than that of CA19-9 or CA-50. On the other hand, false positivity of SLX as well as ST-439 was lowest, and accuracy of SLX was no less high than that of CA19-9 or CA-50. In sera of pancreatic and biliary tract cancer, positive incidences of CA19-9, CEA and ST-439 were 80%, 64% and 53%, respectively, and the diagnostic efficiency increased by combined assay of SLX with CA19-9 (88%), CEA (81%) and ST-439 (71%). SLX appears to be no less useful than the other recently developed carbohydrate antigens or CEA as serum tumor marker for pancreatico-biliary cancer.     

Clinical significance of CA19-9 in diagnosis of digestive tract tumors

ＣｌｉｎｉｃａｌｓｉｇｎｉｆｉｃａｎｃｅｏｆＣＡ１９９ｉｎｄｉａｇｎｏｓｉｓｏｆｄｉｇｅｓｔｉｖｅｔｒａｃｔｔｕｍｏｒｓＺＨＡＯＪｉＺｏｎｇａｎｄＷＵＢｏＨｅｎｇＳｕｂｊｅｃｔｈｅａｄｉｎｇｓＤｉｇｅｓｔｉｖｅｓｙｓｔｅｍｎｅｏｐｌａｓｍｓ;...     

Noninvasive diagnosis of advanced pancreatic cancer by real-time ultrasonography, carcinoembryonic antigen, and carbohydrate antigen 19-9

One-hundred-forty patients with clinical impression of pancreatic cancer were examined prospectively with three noninvasive tests: real-time ultrasonography, determination of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and carbohydrate antigen (CA 19-9). Among them, 24 (17.1%) patients were found to have pancreatic cancer. The sensitivity of ultrasonography, CEA, and CA 19-9 was 72.9%, 70.8%, and 83.3%, respectively; the specificity was 94.0%, 77.6%, and 90.5%, respectively, and the diagnostic accuracy was 91.4%, 76.4%, and 89.3%, respectively. The combination of ultrasonography and determination of serum CA 19-9 had better sensitivity (95.8%), comparable specificity (84.5%), and comparable diagnostic accuracy (86.4%) to any individual test alone or any other combination. It was suggested that combined use of real-time ultrasonography and determination of serum CA 19-9 provided excellent noninvasive screening for patients suspected of having pancreatic cancer.