Laparoscopic thrombendarterectomy of the infrarenal aorta

The aim was to perform a totally laparoscopic thrombendarterectomy (TEA) of the infrarenal aorta to reduce the trauma connected to the surgical approach. A 52-year-old man was referred to our institution with severe claudication. Angiography revealed a subtotal stenosis of the infrarenal aorta. Because the lesion was not suitable for an interventional procedure, a TEA was planned. The surgery was performed through six ports using a transperitoneal approach with pneumoperitoneum. The laparoscopic TEA was carried out according to the standards of open vascular surgery. The surgery time was 285 minutes, the crossclamping lasted 105 minutes, and the blood loss was 100 mL. The angiographic and functional results were excellent. The patient experienced a rapid recovery and was discharged after 6 days. This case report shows the feasibility of totally laparoscopic TEA of the infrarenal aorta. The well-known advantages of minimally invasive techniques in abdominal surgery with regard to the decrease of surgical trauma may also be valid in aortic surgery for occlusive disease.     

Robot-assisted laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass: initial experience developing a new program

Despite improved technology for endovascular treatment of aorto iliac occlusive disease, aortobifemoral bypass (ABF) continues to offer superior long-term patency. In an effort to reduce the morbidity of surgical ABF, multiple minimally invasive techniques have been reported. The da Vinci robot may facilitate the construction of a minimally invasive aortic anastomosis using standard vascular suture techniques. Our initial experience in the development of a minimally invasive surgical aortic reconstruction program is reported. After extensive time in the laboratory developing our surgical technique in human cadavers and a pig model, our team initiated a robotic vascular surgery program in 2007. A retrospective review of our initial six robot-assisted laparoscopic ABF cases was conducted. The aorta was exposed laparoscopically using the Stadler technique and the aortic anastomosis performed with the da Vinci robot. These results are compared with currently published reports of robotic ABF and alternative methods of minimally invasive aortic reconstruction. From January 2007 to August 2007, six robot-assisted laparoscopic ABFs were performed. Two patients had prior abdominal surgical procedures. Four patients had prior endovascular or surgical aorto iliac reconstruction. Operative time varied from 5 h 26 min to 8 h 12 min. Total clamp time, for the aortic anastomosis, ranged from 70 to 100 min with a mean of 75 min. Estimated blood loss ranged from 300 to 2,000 ml with a mean of 850 ml. Conversion with a short upper midline incision was required in one patient (16%) with an associated abdominal aortic aneurysm. Post operative length of stay ranged from five to ten days with a median of seven days. There was no operative mortality. Results from robotically assisted laparoscopic ABF are equivalent to those from other minimally invasive options while enabling a much shorter learning curve. Using the technique described, minimally invasive ABF was accomplished in a safe and reliable manner despite prior vascular treatment.     

Totally retroperitoneal laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass

The classic procedure for aortobifemoral bypass is open surgery. Since the first totally laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass reported in 1997 by Yves-Marie Dion, laparoscopy has been accepted by several authors as a possible minimally invasive alternative for aorto-iliac occlusive disease. The transperitoneal left retrocolic and retrorenal ways are generally used. The totally retroperitoneal laparoscopic procedure has been described as an alternative to the transperitoneal approach. We report here a totally laparoscopic retroperitoneal approach to performing aortobifemoral bypass. This approach was proposed to a 51-year-old man with aorto-iliac occlusive disease. There was no indication for endovascular revascularization. The patient suffered from 10 metres of bilateral intermittent claudication and lower limb ulcers. During the surgical procedure our patient was placed in a 30-degree right lateral decubitus position. The optical system was first placed in an intra-abdominal position to check the positioning of the trocars in the left retroperitoneal space. The dissection of the retroperitoneal space was performed by CO2 insufflation and by blunt dissection using laparoscopic forceps. The infrarenal aorta was exposed and clamped by laparoscopic clamps. A bifurcated graft was sutured on the left-hand side of the aorta by a running suture. Both prosthetic limbs were tunnelized retroperitoneally to the groin under optical control. The femoral anastomoses were performed by classic open surgery.     

International Consultation on Urological Diseases and European Association of Urology International Consultation on Minimally Invasive Surgery in Urology: laparoscopic and robotic adrenalectomy

The aim of this study was to provide an evidence‐based systematic review of the use of laparoscopic and robotic adrenalectomy in the treatment of adrenal disease as part of the International Consultation on Urological Diseases and European Association of Urology consultation on Minimally Invasive Surgery in Urology. A systematic literature search (January 2004 to January 2014) was conducted to identify comparative studies assessing the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive adrenal surgery. Subtopics including the role of minimally invasive surgery for pheochromocytoma, adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) and large adrenal tumours were examined. Additionally, the role of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches, as well as laparoendoscopic single‐site (LESS) and robotic adrenalectomy were reviewed. The major findings are presented in an evidence‐based fashion. Large retrospective and prospective data were analysed and a set of recommendations provided by the committee was produced. Laparoscopic surgery should be considered the first‐line therapy for benign adrenal masses requiring surgical resection and for patients with pheochromocytoma. While a laparoscopic approach may be feasible for selected cases of ACC without adjacent organ involvement, an open surgical approach remains the ‘gold standard’. Large adrenal tumours without preoperative or intra‐operative suspicion of ACC may be safely resected via a laparoscopic approach. Both transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches to laparoscopic adrenalectomy are safe. The approach should be chosen based on surgeon training and experience. LESS and robotic adrenalectomy should be considered as alternatives to laparoscopic adrenalectomy but require further study.     

Laparoscopic aortofemoral bypass. Initial experience in an animal model.

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to evaluate the feasibility of laparoscopic aortofemoral bypass in a porcine model. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Laparoscopic techniques have been applied to numerous general and thoracic surgical procedures. Their application to vascular surgery has been virtually nonexistent. Open surgery for aortoiliac occlusive disease is accompanied by significant morbidity rates, and minimally invasive procedures have the disadvantage of reduced patency rates. Laparoscopic aortofemoral replacement has the theoretical advantage of long-term patency with reduced postoperative complications. METHODS: Between January and September 1993, laparoscopic surgery was performed on 16 pigs: 6 underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic aortic dissection and vessel control alone; 7 underwent complete transperitoneal laparoscopic aortofemoral bypass; and 3 underwent a retroperitoneal approach. The aortic anastomosis was performed using a combination of sutures and titanium clips in an end-to-side fashion in five pigs, and a custom-made nonsutured graft was secured with use of an end-to-end method in five pigs. Femoral anastomoses were performed with the standard open technique. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in all 10 animals and with no major complications. Mean blood loss was 20 ml (range, 5-50 ml), and mean operative time was 2.45 hours (range, 2-4 hrs). On aortic-clamp release, 2 of the end-to-side anastomoses required additional sutures to stop bleeding between oversized staples, and 2 of the end-to-end anastomoses required additional ties to reinforce loose ties. All 10 grafts and anastomoses were patent and free of leaks after completion of the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic aortofemoral bypass is technically feasible in a porcine model. Further experimental work with new instrumentation and technical refinement will make laparoscopic surgery feasible for the treatment of vascular disease in humans.     

Laparoscopic lumbar spinal fusion: the role of the general surgeon

The refinement of minimally invasive surgical techniques has impacted all areas of surgical practice. Laparoscopic approaches to lumbar spine fusion via the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal routes have similarly evolved with the development of new techniques and instruments unique to this procedure. The benefits of laparoscopic fusion techniques include shorter hospital stay, improved postoperative relief of pain, and preservation of critical spinal musculature. A general surgical laparoscopist is a critical member of the operative team. Although the technical details of the procedure are becoming standardized, patient selection is critical to maximize benefit and minimize risk.     

Totally laparoscopic tube graft bypass for infrarenal aortic aneurysm: a well-established surgical technique

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair enters the field of laparoscopic surgery. Main advantage of laparoscopic AAA repair is to perform the gold standard endoaneurysmorraphy with a reduced surgical trauma. Since 2001, the technique has evolved and is now well-established. We describe the standard technique of totally laparoscopic endoaneurysmorraphy with tube graft interposition through a transperitoneal left retrorenal approach. Main technical points are discussed.     

COMPARISON OF 3 SURGICAL APPROACHES TO LAPAROSCOPIC ADRENALECTOMY: A NONRANDOMIZED, BACKGROUND MATCHED ANALYSIS

PURPOSE: To clarify the characteristics of surgical approaches to laparoscopic adrenalectomy we performed background matched analysis of clinical outcomes of the 3 approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From February 1992 to July 2000 we performed 118 laparoscopic adrenalectomies in 115 patients with adrenal tumors. For these operations we used the anterior transperitoneal approach in 46 patients, the lateral transperitoneal approach in 32 and the lateral retroperitoneal approach in 40. RESULTS: To exclude the learning curve effect we eliminated our initial 20 patients treated with the anterior transperitoneal approach. To allow background matching of the 3 groups we also excluded 14 patients with tumors more than 5 cm., 6 who underwent conversion to open surgery and 1 patient who required 5 days of bed rest for retroperitoneal hematoma caused by bleeding from a trocar port. The final analysis included 16, 25 and 36 cases managed via the anterior transperitoneal, lateral transperitoneal and lateral retroperitoneal approach, respectively. Average operative time was significantly shorter for the lateral transperitoneal approach. Postoperative recovery was not significantly different in the lateral transperitoneal and lateral retroperitoneal groups. Postoperative complications included mild paralytic ileus in 2 patients and shoulder tip pain, probably peritoneal irritation due to carbon dioxide insufflation and bowel preparation, in 4 in the transperitoneal groups. Our results imply that the easiest procedure is the lateral transperitoneal approach but the lateral retroperitoneal approach is slightly less invasive. CONCLUSIONS: Although it is important to remember that this study was not a prospective randomized trial and, thus, had from certain biases, we believe that if a tumor is more than 5 cm. and/or the surgeon is not yet skilled in laparoscopic adrenalectomy, the lateral transperitoneal approach is the most suitable method. If the surgeon has performed at least 20 operations, the adrenal tumor is unilateral and the lesion is less than 5 cm., the lateral retroperitoneal approach seems to be more suitable because of its minimally invasive nature. The lateral retroperitoneal approach is also preferred in patients with a history of upper abdominal surgery. With improvements in technique and new instruments the time required for the lateral retroperitoneal approach has been significantly decreased.     

Totally Laparoscopic Tube Graft Bypass for Infrarenal Aortic Aneurysm: a Well-Established Surgical Technique

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair enters the field of laparoscopic surgery. Main advantage of laparoscopic AAA repair is to perform the gold standard endoaneurysmorraphy with a reduced surgical trauma. Since 2001, the technique has evolved and is now well-established. We describe the standard technique of totally laparoscopic endoaneurysmorraphy with tube graft interposition through a transperitoneal left retrorenal approach. Main technical points are discussed.     

Eight-year experience with transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenal surgery

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is currently the technique of choice for removing benign adrenal lesions. Various laparoscopic techniques and approaches have been reported using the transperitoneal or retroperitoneal approach. We present our 8-year experience with and long-term results of transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between October 1992 and October 2000, 161 laparoscopic approaches to the adrenal gland were performed, including 145 unilateral and 10 bilateral adrenalectomies, and 6 conservative operations. Patients were placed in the 60-degree flank position with the bed flexed to increase the surgical field. To avoid hypertensive crisis, especially in patients with pheochromocytoma, the first step involved early ligation of the adrenal vein. RESULTS: The laparoscopic procedure was successfully completed in all except 4 cases, which were converted to open surgery. Mean operative time was 160 minutes in the unilateral, 245 in the bilateral and 90 in the conservative group. Delayed complications included hemoperitoneum in 3 patients, which was drained surgically, severe blood loss in 3 treated with blood transfusion and wound infection in 2. Patients were ambulatory on the morning of postoperative day 1 and were discharged home 2.8, 5 and 1.8 days after unilateral, bilateral and conservative surgery, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic transperitoneal adrenalectomy is a safe, effective, minimally invasive approach in patients with benign functioning or nonfunctioning adrenal masses. This technique involves low morbidity, minimal postoperative analgesic requirements and a short hospital stay.     

Transperitoneal approach should be considered for suspected ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms

Although transperitoneal surgical repair has been the gold standard for patients with a suspected ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA), the retroperitoneal approach and endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) are increasingly being recommended as preferred approaches due to lower morbidity and mortality. To highlight the importance of considering the transperitoneal approach, we present three cases of suspected rAAA, all with a known AAA, who were found to have other significant intra-abdominal pathology at surgery that would have been missed using the other approaches.     

The ALIF concept

The terms ‘minimally invasive’ or ‘less invasive surgery’ have been used recently to describe surgical approaches or operations that are performed with less trauma to anatomical structures on the way to or surrounding the surgical ‘target area’. These types of surgical procedures are usually performed with the help of ‘high-tech’ instruments such as surgical endoscopes or surgical microscopes, modern video techniques and automated instruments. Within the last 10 years, such techniques have been developed in the field of spinal surgery. The application of minimally or less invasive procedures has concentrated predominantly on anterior approaches to the thoracic and lumbar spine. This article describes two anterior approach techniques for performing anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) through a minimally invasive retroperitoneal or transperitoneal approach. The technical principles are microsurgical modifications of traditional anterior approaches to the lumbar spine. Through small (4-cm) skin incisions, the target area can be exposed. Preliminary results suggest decreased peri - and postoperative morbidity, less blood loss, earlier rehabilitation and acceptable complication rates. The technique is currently used by the author for all patients requiring anterior lumbar interbody fusion.     

Minilaparotomy for aortoiliac aneurysmal disease: experience and review of the literature

Vascular surgery is evolving, as other specialities, toward minimally invasive techniques. Presently, 3 approaches to aortoiliac disease are suggested as minimally invasive. Besides the endovascular procedures, laparoscopic techniques and minilaparotomy are being advocated. Although for aneurysmal disease, we favor a totally laparoscopic approach, criticisms raised over laparoscopy-assisted techniques by those advocating minilaparotomy led us to investigate the benefits of the latter technique. We first evaluated the procedure in 7 patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). We found the procedure impossible to perform with an 8- to 10-cm incision in 6 of the 7 patients. This led us to evaluate causes of failure of the technique. It appeared to us that most of our complications were related to inadequate exposure. Fifty consecutive computed tomography scans from patients with AAA of surgical size were then reviewed to evaluate the aneurysm lengths and compare them to the reported lengths of skin incision for minilaparotomy. Results were expressed adding a total of 2 cm for proximal and distal clamping. Only 2% of patients would present with aneurysms suitable for treatment through an 8-cm midline incision and 30% through a 10-cm incision. We then reviewed the literature on minilaparotomy. We believe that minilaparotomy should be reserved for those patients with purely aortic disease and the appropriate body habitus.     

腹腔镜手术治疗肾囊肿23例疗效观察

目的 :探讨腹腔镜手术治疗单纯性肾囊肿的方法及疗效。方法 :通过经腹腔和经腹膜后两种途径 ,采用腹腔镜技术对 2 3例单纯性肾囊肿患者行囊肿去顶术 ,并与 9例行开放性肾囊肿去顶术的患者进行比较。结果 :经腹膜后途径手术的手术时间显著长于开放手术 (P <0 .0 5 ) ,经腹腔途径手术的手术时间与开放手术无显著性差异 (P >0 .0 5 ) ,腹腔镜手术患者的术中失血量及术后住院时间均显著少于开放手术 (P <0 .0 1)。结论 :腹腔镜手术是治疗单纯性肾囊肿创伤小、效果好的有效方法     

Minimally invasive cardiac surgery

Cardiac surgery has been the last of the surgical specialties to embrace the principles of minimal invasiveness. The complexity and invasiveness of the procedures have presented both a problem and an opportunity to make the procedures less invasive. Beginning with initial attempts at coronary artery bypass surgery through limited access with and without robotics, a number of other cardiac procedures currently are being performed by minimally invasive approaches. These include mitral valve repair, transapical aortic valve implant, limited access, and totally endoscopic pulmonary vein isolation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation and the treatment of aortic aneurysmal disease by thoracic endografting. The experience with less invasive surgery in other specialties has served as cross-fertilization for minimally invasive cardiac surgery.     

Laparoscopy-assisted abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: early and middle-term results of a consecutive series of 122 cases

BACKGROUND: Endoaneurysmorrhaphy with intraluminal graft placement, described by Creech, is the gold standard for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. Endovascular aneurysm repair has gained popularity for its minimal invasiveness and satisfying short-term results, but there are still many concerns about the long-term success of the procedure. Since 1998, laparoscopic surgery has been proposed for AAA treatment. The potential benefits of a minimally invasive procedure reproducing the endoaneurysmorrhaphy results over time have been advocated. In our experience, hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) has been routinely used for the open-surgery transperitoneal/retroperitoneal approach and for endovascular aneurysm repair. After 4 years, we are able to define the early and middle-term results of such laparoscopic-assisted treatment. METHODS: From October 2000 to March 2004, 604 consecutive nonurgent AAAs were treated at our institution. Of these, 122 (20.2%) were treated by HALS. Exclusion criteria for HALS were hostile abdomen (previous major abdominal or aortic surgery), bilateral diffuse common iliac and/or hypogastric aneurysms, massive aortoiliac calcifications, and severe cardiac (ejection fraction <35%) and respiratory (P(O2) <60 mm Hg or carbon dioxide >50 mm Hg) insufficiency. Juxtarenal and proximal iliac aneurysms were not a contraindication, nor was obesity. In all patients, we performed a minilaparotomy (7-8 cm) both for laparoscopic hand-assisted dissection and for endoaneurysmorrhaphy. All perioperative data were prospectively recorded. Follow-up consisted of ultrasonography and clinical evaluation after 6 and 12 months and then every year after surgery. RESULTS: The mean laparoscopic and total operative times were respectively 64 +/- 32 minutes and 257 +/- 70 minutes, the mean aortic cross-clamping time was 76 +/- 26 minutes, and the mean autotransfused blood volume was 1136 +/- 711 mL. The overall mortality and morbidity were respectively 0% and 12.2%. Morbidity was surgery related in only two cases (bleeding from an ipogastric artery lesion and a leg graft thrombosis). The mean intensive care unit stay was 14.3 +/- 13 hours. Oral food intake was resumed after 27.4 +/- 15 hours, and patients were discharged after a mean of 4.4 +/- 1.7 days. Operative times were not affected by obesity, suprarenal aortic cross-clamping, or aneurysm size. Both concomitant iliac aneurysms and bifurcated graft implantation (related to longer vascular reconstruction) involved significantly longer operative times. The learning curve of the procedure (comparing the first 30 patients with the last 92 patients) led to significantly shorter endoscopic, cross-clamping, and total operative times (P = .000). The mean follow-up was 28.6 +/- 16 months. Three incisional hernias and one case of bowel occlusion were detected. All these cases (3.4%) required laparoscopic treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The HALS technique is a safe and minimally invasive treatment for AAA; it is useful for limiting the need for conventional open surgery and reducing the length of hospital stay. Despite the lack of randomized studies, HALS seems to be associated with a better postoperative course than standard open surgery. HALS can also be considered as an equivalent of a well-established procedure and as a bridge between open and total laparoscopic surgery.     

Update on laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted prostatectomy have been proposed as alternatives to traditional open retropubic prostatectomy. In this review, we update the more recent data concerning the results, technical trends and controversies regarding these novel, minimally invasive procedures. RECENT FINDINGS: As a result of improved patient selection, a better understanding of surgical anatomy, and refinements in surgical techniques, traditional retropubic prostatectomy set the standards very high, leaving little room for improvement. In this review, the results of laparoscopic prostatectomy are compared with contemporary in addition to historical series. Besides the transperitoneal laparoscopic approach, which was almost exclusively used in the initial series, the introduction and development of the extraperitoneal laparoscopic approach meant a significant change in the surgical strategy of a number of teams worldwide. The relative merits of the transperitoneal and extraperitoneal approaches are discussed. Robotic radical prostatectomy is a promising technical innovation that allows us to overcome many of the inherent limitations of laparoscopic surgery. As a result of financial constraints, the experience has been limited to a few centres worldwide. SUMMARY: Although long-term results are still lacking, novel minimally invasive techniques seem to fulfil the highest standards of radical prostatectomy in terms of early oncological cure, functional results and morbidity. A standardization of data collection and evaluation methodology will be indispensable for a better comparison of the different series.     

Laparoscopic and Retroperitoneoscopic Radical Nephrectomy: Techniques and Outcome

ObjectivesMinimally invasive radical nephrectomy has gained widespread acceptance in the urological community. Both the laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic approach have been established and advocated for radical surgery. Our experience and the advantages and indications for each procedure are analyzed in this article.MethodsData from two clinics that routinely perform either laparoscopic or retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy for localized tumours are compared. At the Charité Urology Clinic, Campus Mitte, the transperitoneal laparoscopic approach is the preferred technique for T1 and selected T2 tumours. At the Basel University Hospital, the preferred technique for patients with clinical T1 renal tumours is retroperitoneoscopy.ResultsDuring a period of 5 yr, 163 patients underwent minimally invasive nephrectomy using either the laparoscopic (n = 125) or the retroperitoneoscopic (n = 38) approach. There were no major intraoperative complications with either technique. Intra- and postoperative data were comparable and oncological outcome was similar for both techniques, at a mean follow-up of 25 mo.ConclusionsBoth retro- and transperitoneal approaches of minimally invasive radical nephrectomy are safe procedures that achieve the same standard and duplicate oncological principles established for open surgery.