Ranitidine in the treatment of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug associated gastric and duodenal ulcers.

In a multicentre study the effect of ranitidine on healing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) associated peptic ulcers was compared in a group of patients who had stopped NSAID treatment with another group who continued with NSAID treatment. A total of 190 patients with confirmed ulcers were randomised to continue or stop NSAID treatment. All patients in addition received ranitidine 150 mg twice daily. Patients were endoscopically monitored at four, eight, and 12 weeks. Gastric ulcers at eight weeks had healed in 63% of those taking NSAIDs compared with 95% of those who had stopped NSAID treatment. For duodenal ulcer the healing rates at eight weeks were 84% in the group continuing NSAIDs compared with 100% in those who stopped NSAIDs. The differences in healing rates were statistically significant for both gastric ulcer (p = 0.001) and for duodenal ulcer (p = 0.006). At 12 weeks, 79% of gastric ulcers and 92% of duodenal ulcers were healed in the group continuing with NSAIDs. All patients with gastric and duodenal ulcers who stopped taking NSAIDs were healed at 12 weeks. The study shows that ranitidine 150 mg twice daily effectively heals NSAID associated peptic ulcers. Healing is more successful when NSAID treatment stops but even if these drugs are continued, substantial healing rates are achievable.     

Randomised study of the influence of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on the treatment of peptic ulcer in patients with rheumatic disease.

Sixty-seven patients with rheumatic disease, treated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), entered a controlled trial with a diagnosis of duodenal (n = 51), gastric (n = 14), or gastric and duodenal (n = 2) ulcers. The main objectives of the study were a comparison of ranitidine and sucralfate in ulcer treatment, and to observe the influence of continued NSAID administration during peptic ulcer therapy. Ulcers healed within nine weeks in 52 patients. The mean healing time was similar in 27 patients given ranitidine 150 mg bd (4.9 weeks) and 25 patients given sucralfate 1 g qid (4.6 weeks). In patients with unhealed ulcers after nine weeks of treatment, healing was obtained in seven after further therapy for 3-9 weeks. Of the 30 patients who continued NSAIDs during treatment with either ranitidine or sucralfate, 23 ulcers healed (mean healing time: 5.0 weeks). Of 32 patients in whom NSAIDs were stopped, ulcer healing was documented in 29 (mean healing time: 4.6 weeks). The difference in healing rates was not statistically significant (p greater than 0.10). The outcome of ulcer treatment did not differ in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and patients suffering from osteoarthritis. During a 12 month follow up 14 symptomatic ulcer recurrences were recorded.     

What consideration should be given to Helicobacter pylori in treating nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug ulcers?

Although Helicobacter pylori and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) both cause peptic ulcers, they do so by different mechanisms so any interaction is not necessarily harmful. H. pylori has been shown to enhance gastric mucosal prostaglandin synthesis, while NSAIDs suppress it Pragmatically, there is no compelling evidence in favour of H. pylori eradication in all patients who take NSAIDs. As a broad generalisation, in therapeutic studies of NSAID users, those who have no ulcer at trial entry are more prone to ulcer development if they are H. pylori-positive. By contrast, in those who have ulcers at baseline, H. pylori-positive individuals are less likely to develop ulcers, particularly if taking acid-suppressive therapy. Trials of H. pylori eradication therapy tend to replicate this dichotomy. In one study of patients starting NSAIDs for the first time, with no ulcer history and no baseline ulcer, use of bismuth-based eradication therapy was associated with a lower incidence of gastric ulcer at 2 months. Conversely, in a study of patients with endoscopically proven ulcers and/or troublesome dyspepsia, proton pump inhibitor based eradication treatment had no effect on outcome (of acid suppression) over 6 months. H. pylori eradication has been associated with significantly slower healing of gastric ulcers compared with patients who did not undergo eradication. However, the effect of H. pylori eradication on healing of NSAID-associated duodenal ulcers does not appear to be so dramatic, and limited evidence suggests that it may be possible to prevent H. pylori-associated duodenal ulcer by eradicating the infection. An evidence-based approach to treatment would suggest that NSAID users should undergo H. pylori eradication therapy if they have a duodenal ulcer, whether or not they continue NSAIDs. Because COX-2 inhibitors appear not to be ulcerogenic, management of H. pylori in patients taking these drugs can be based upon the same risk assessment as in patients not taking anti-arthritis drugs. H. pylori eradication should not be used universally or in high-risk gastric ulcer patients who require management with acid suppression.     

L’ulcère bulbaire hémorragique et les anti-inflammatoires non stéro?diens : quelle gravité de l’accident hémorragique ?

Introduction

Non steroidal anti inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most prescribed and used drugs, because of their therapeutic efficacy in multiple epidemiological indication. Severity of the bleeding in the case of duodenal ulcer would be different between the group of patients taking NSAIDs and those not taking NSAIDs before bleeding complication.

Materials and methods

We propose to study the group of patients admitted for bleeding peptic ulcer (BPU) with NSAIDs and to compare it to the group without NSAIDs. Four hundred and twenty eight patients were admitted during this period for bleeding duodenal ulcer.

Results

The NSAID previous hemorrha 29.5% of patients (n=126). There was no statistically significant difference between the group taking NSAID (n=126) and NSAIDs negative (n=302) in terms of average age (45.4 vs 45 respectively). There is a clear male predominance compared in the 2 groups. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of average rate of Hte, endoscopic data (seat of the ulcer, stage Forrest, endoscopic hemostasis). The surgery was no more frequent in cases of BPU associated with NSAID Furthermore, patients who used NSAIDs had more frequent initial hemodynamic instability (4 patients vs 1, p=0.01), recurred more frequently (8.7% vs 4%, p=0.04) and there was trend to more death in the group with NSAID.

Conclusion

The episode of bleeding from peptic ulcer associated with NSAID use was more severe     

Toxicity of NSAIDs in the stomach and duodenum.

NSAIDs are widely used for analgesic, anti-inflammatory and anti-thrombotic indications. Such use carries the risk of gastrointestinal complications (1% over 6 months) which NSAIDs may promote from both ulcerous and nonulcerous lesions. Symptoms are poor predictors of serious lesions and complications, which may occur without previous symptoms. NSAIDs also delay healing of peptic ulcers, even to the extent of intractability, and may cause recurrence after gastric surgery. Prophylactic therapy is indicated in high-risk patients (age > 60 years, previous ulcer history, high dose, concomitant use of corticosteroids or anticoagulants). Misoprostol, omeprazole and high-dose famotidine have been shown to reduce the occurrence of both gastric and duodenal ulcers in NSAID users. At present, the role of Helicobacter pylori in NSAID-induced gastroduodenal lesions is controversial and there is no agreement in considering the organism as a risk factor and indicating its eradication in NSAID users.     

Role of Helicobacter pylori in ulcer healing and recurrence of gastric and duodenal ulcers in longterm NSAID users. Response to omeprazole dual therapy.

BACKGROUND: The relation between Helicobacter pylori infection and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-associated peptic ulcers remains unclear; in particular, it is not known whether H pylori plays a part in the healing and recurrence of these ulcers. AIMS: To evaluate prospectively in a consecutive series of arthritis patients receiving longterm NSAID treatment the prevalence of peptic ulcer as well as the effect of H pylori eradication on the healing and recurrence of gastric and duodenal ulcer found. PATIENTS: Some 278 consecutive patients underwent gastroscopy with multiple biopsies of the gastric antrum and corpus for histological examination and rapid urease test. One hundred peptic ulcers (59 gastric ulcers, 39 duodenal ulcers, and two gastric ulcers concomitant with a duodenal ulcer) were found. Seventy per cent of these ulcers were H pylori positive. METHODS: According to their H pylori status, ulcer patients were randomised to one of the following treatments: H pylori negative ulcers received omeprazole 20 mg twice daily for four to eight weeks, whereas H pylori positive lesions were treated with omeprazole 20 mg twice daily plus amoxycillin 1 g twice daily (the second of these for the first two weeks) or omeprazole alone for four to eight weeks while continuing NSAID therapy. Patients with healed ulcers were endoscopically followed up for six months after stopping antiulcer therapy while continuing NSAIDs. RESULTS: Endoscopic healing rates for gastric and duodenal ulcers in the three different groups were similar both at four and eight weeks. H pylori eradication did not influence healing, which occurred in 14 of 20 (70%) of patients in whom H pylori was eradicated, compared with 14 of 17 (82%) of patients with persistent infection. Cumulative recurrence rates at six months did not statistically differ among the three different groups (27% in H pylori negative, 46% in H pylori positive, and 31% in those where H pylori was eradicated during the healing phase), although a numerical trend in favour of a higher recurrence rate in infected patients was evident. CONCLUSIONS: H pylori eradication does not confer any significant advantage on the healing of gastric and duodenal ulcers associated with longterm NSAID use. It remains to be established with certainty whether eradication may be helpful in the reduction of recurrence in a specific subset of NSAID associated ulcer.     

Helicobacter pylori eradication as the sole treatment for gastric and duodenal ulcers

OBJECTIVES: It is uncertain whether eradication of Helicobacter pylori--without a prolonged suppression of acid secretion--is sufficient to allow healing of peptic ulcers. We evaluated whether eradication of H. pylori with no following anti-secretory medication then administered is sufficient for treatment of peptic ulcers. We also looked at the impact of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) use on ulcer relapses. METHODS: The effect of eradication on ulcer healing and relapse rate was analysed in 115 patients, randomly allocated to four treatment groups: (1) quadruple therapy (28); (2) dual therapy (n-30); (3) triple therapy (n=27); and (4) lansoprazole and placebo (n=30). Endoscopic assessment was performed at 0, 8, and 52 weeks. RESULTS: The ulcer healing rate was 100% [95% confidence interval (CI), 95-100%] in H. pylori-negative and 83% (95% CI, 67-94%) in H. pylori-positive patients (P<0.01). In patients who used NSAIDS or ASA, the healing rates was 100% (95% CI, 73-100%) and 75% (95% CI, 19-99%) in H. pylori-negative (12 patients) and H. pylori-positive patients (four patients) (P = not significant). Ulcer relapses occurred in 5% (95% CI, 1-13%) of H. pylori-negative and in 36% (95% CI, 19-56%) of H. pylori-positive patients (P < 0.01). In H. pylori-negative patients who used NSAIDs or ASA the ulcer relapse rate was 30% (95% CI, 7-65%), whereas the ulcer relapse rate was 2% (95% CI, 0.4-10%) in patients who did not use NSAIDs or ASA (P < 0.05). No difference in ulcer relapse rate in H. pylori-positive patients who used or did not use NSAIDs or ASA was found. The eradication rate of H. pylori was 93% (95% CI, 76-99%) in the quadruple therapy group, 83% (95% CI, 64-94%) in the dual therapy group, 100% (95% CI, 87-100%) in the triple therapy group, and 0% (95% CI, 0-12%) in the lansoprazole and placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Eradication treatment for H. pylori-positive gastric or duodenal ulcer is sufficient, with no need to follow it with anti-secretory medication. Cure of the infection reduces ulcer relapses in patients who did not use NSAIDs or ASA.     

Angiogenesis in gastric ulcers: impaired in patients taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) therapy is associated with delayed gastroduodenal ulcer healing. In rats the degree of angiogenesis (new vessel formation) within the ulcer bed correlates strongly with the extent and speed of ulcer healing and may be inhibited by NSAIDs. This study therefore assessed the vascularity of 38 antral gastric ulcers immunohistochemically, using CD31 a vascular endothelial cell marker, in 17 patients taking NSAIDs and 19 control patients. In the superficial granulation tissue NSAID therapy was associated with a significant reduction in the median number of capillaries (13.5 (IQR: 9.5-18) v 23.5 (14-31) (p < 0.005)), number of vessel buds (6 (4-12.5) v 17 (12-23) (p < 0.05)), and maximum vessel diameter (29 (20.75-30.75) v 33.75 (24-45) (p < 0.05)) when compared with controls. In deep granulation tissue NSAID therapy was similarly associated with a significant reduction in the number of capillaries (9 (6.5-12) v 14 (9-19.25) (p < 0.04)), number of vessel buds (5 (3.5-8.5) v 13 (7-16.5) (p < 0.01)), and maximum vessel diameter (23 (18-20.5) v 33 (21.5-45) (p < 0.02)). There were no differences in vascularity in the adjacent glandular mucosa. Impairment of angiogenesis may be an important mechanism of NSAID related delayed ulcer healing.     

Famotidine for healing and maintenance in nonsteroidal anti- inflammatory drug-associated gastroduodenal ulceration

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are strongly associated with gastroduodenal ulceration. How to manage patients with NSAID-associated ulcers is a common clinical dilemma. High-dose famotidine in the healing and maintenance of NSAID-associated gastroduodenal ulceration was therefore evaluated. METHODS: One hundred four patients with rheumatoid or osteoarthritis who had gastroduodenal ulceration received famotidine, 40 mg twice daily. Sixteen patients stopped and 88 continued their NSAID treatment. Ulcer healing was assessed endoscopically at 4 and 12 weeks. Seventy-eight NSAID users with healed ulcers were then randomized to receive 40 mg twice daily famotidine or placebo and underwent endoscopy at 4, 12, and 24 weeks. RESULTS: Cumulative ulcer healing rates at 12 weeks were 89.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82.3%-95.7%) for patients who continued NSAID treatment and 100% (95% CI, 82.9%-100.0%) for those who stopped. The subsequent estimated cumulative gastroduodenal ulcer relapse over 6 months for NSAID users who took placebo was 53.5% (95% CI, 36.6%- 70.3%). This was reduced to 26.0% (12.1%-39.9%) in patients taking famotidine (P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: High-dose famotidine is effective ulcer healing therapy in patients who stop or continue NSAID treatment and significantly reduced the cumulative incidence of gastroduodenal ulcer recurrence compared with placebo when given as maintenance therapy. (Gastroenterology 1997 Jun;112(6):1817-22)     

NSAID-associated dyspepsia and ulcers: a prospective cohort study in primary care

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) cause dyspeptic complaints and lesions in the upper gastrointestinal tract. The true incidence of these side effects in the everyday situation remains uncertain. We therefore investigated as to how often patients on NSAIDs in the primary care setting must be expected to develop troublesome dyspepsia and/or ulcers in the upper gastrointestinal tract. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Admitted to the study were consecutive patients requiring NSAID treatment for at least 2 weeks, who were free of treatment-requiring dyspeptic symptoms, and who were not receiving any prophylactic co-medication. After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment with a NSAID, a standardized questionnaire and endoscopy of the upper gastrointestinal tract were obtained. RESULTS: 104 patients (median age 53 years, 91 women) were recruited to the study. Four patients had to be excluded for protocol violations. NSAID treatment was applied mainly with diclofenac (n = 67), followed by ibuprofen (n = 22) and rofecoxib (n = 9). The main indication was degenerative complaints affecting the vertebral column and joints. Under treatment, 35% of the patients developed troublesome dyspepsia that required treatment. The frequency of dyspepsia was independent of the duration of NSAID use. Ulcer prevalence was 16% (duodenal ulcer: n = 5; gastric ulcer: n = 11; cardiac ulcer: n = 1). Relevant epigastric pain was experienced more frequently by ulcer patients than those with no ulcer (35 vs. 18%, p = n.s.), but their overall symptom frequency was no higher than in the latter. Predictors for the development of ulcer were smoking (odds ratio 5.11 [1.59-16.48]), regular use of alcohol (odds ratio 4.49 [1.34-15.07]) and duration of treatment less than 1 month (odds ratio 4.95 [1.06-23.09]). No ulcer complications occurred during the period under observation. Overall, 44% of the patients developed troublesome dyspepsia and/or ulcer. CONCLUSION: Primary care patients with an average risk profile frequently develop dyspeptic symptoms requiring treatment, and ulcers while on NSAIDs. Patients who developed an ulcer were not identifiable on the basis of symptoms or risk factors.     

Peptic ulcer disease today

Over the past few decades, since the introduction of histamine H(2)-receptor antagonists, proton-pump inhibitors, cyclo-oxygenase-2-selective anti-inflammatory drugs (coxibs), and eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection, the incidence of peptic ulcer disease and ulcer complications has decreased. There has, however, been an increase in ulcer bleeding, especially in elderly patients. At present, there are several management issues that need to be solved: how to manage H. pylori infection when eradication failure rates are high; how best to prevent ulcers developing and recurring in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and aspirin users; and how to treat non-NSAID, non-H. pylori-associated peptic ulcers. Looking for H. pylori infection, the overt or surreptitious use of NSAIDs and/or aspirin, and the possibility of an acid hypersecretory state are important diagnostic considerations that determine the therapeutic approach. Combined treatment with antisecretory therapy and antibiotics for 1-2 weeks is the first-line choice for H. pylori eradication therapy. For patients at risk of developing an ulcer or ulcer complications, it is important to choose carefully which anti-inflammatory drugs, nonselective NSAIDs or coxibs to use, based on a risk assessment of the patient, especially if the high-risk patient also requires aspirin. Testing for and eradicating H. pylori infection in patients is recommended before starting NSAID therapy, and for those currently taking NSAIDs, when there is a history of ulcers or ulcer complications. Understanding the pathophysiology and best treatment strategies for non-NSAID, non-H. pylori-associated peptic ulcers presents a challenge.     

Influence of sex and Helicobacter pylori on development and healing of gastroduodenal lesions in non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug users

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Factors predisposing to endoscopic ulcer formation or healing with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have not been well defined. METHODS: We used multivariate analysis of data from three large similar trials to identify factors associated with endoscopic lesions and healing. We compared the effectiveness of omeprazole 20 mg and 40 mg daily, misoprostol 200 micro g four times daily, and ranitidine 150 mg twice daily in healing ulcers and erosions at different sites and in patients who were Helicobacter pylori positive and negative. RESULTS: Older age, past ulcer history, rheumatoid arthritis, and H pylori infection were significantly associated with ulcers. Duodenal ulcer was significantly more likely than gastric ulcer with a past ulcer history (odds ratio 1.59, 1.16-2.17), H pylori infection (1.4, 1.04-1.92), and male sex (2.35, 1.75-3.16) while female sex, older age (> or = 60 years: 1.39, 1.03-1.88), and higher NSAID dose (>1 defined daily dose: 1.57, 1.16-2.14) were associated with gastric ulceration. Sex differences were seen in both H pylori positive and negative patients. Gastric and duodenal ulcer healing was significantly faster with omeprazole 20 mg than with misoprostol 200 micro g four times daily or ranitidine 150 mg twice daily although misoprostol was more effective at healing erosions. Gastric ulcer healing was slower with large ulcers (0.37, 0.25-0.54 for >10 mm v 5-10 mm) or a past ulcer history (0.51, 0.34-0.76), and faster with H pylori infection (1.55, 1.06-2.29), especially with acid suppression (72% v 37% at four weeks with ranitidine). CONCLUSIONS: Among NSAID users, H pylori and male sex independently increase the likelihood of duodenal ulceration. H pylori infection does not affect duodenal ulcer healing and enhances gastric ulcer healing by ranitidine and possibly other acid suppressing treatments.     

Helicobacter pylori and risk of ulcer bleeding among users of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Peptic ulcer complications related to use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most common serious adverse drug reactions. Whether Helicobacter pylori infection potentiates this gastrointestinal toxicity of NSAIDs is still unresolved. In this study, we investigated the role of H. pylori as a cause of bleeding peptic ulcer among NSAID users. METHODS: A case-control study of current users (n = 132) of NSAIDs (including acetylsalicylic acid), admitted because of bleeding peptic ulcer, was performed. Controls were 136 NSAID users without gastrointestinal complications. H. pylori was diagnosed by either increased levels of serum immunoglobulin G or by 13C-urea breath test. RESULTS: Fifty-eight (44%) case subjects had a bleeding gastric ulcer, 54 (41%) had a bleeding duodenal ulcer, 12 (9%) had both gastric and duodenal ulcers, and 8 (6%) had hemorrhagic gastritis. H. pylori was present in 75 (57%) cases compared with 59 (43%) controls. The adjusted odds ratio of bleeding peptic ulcer among NSAID users associated with H. pylori infection was 1.81 (95% confidence interval, 1.02-3.21). H. pylori accounted for approximately 24% of bleeding peptic ulcers among elderly NSAID users. CONCLUSIONS: NSAID users infected with H. pylori have an almost twofold increased risk of bleeding peptic ulcer compared with NSAID users without H. pylori.     

Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drug-Associated Gastric Ulcers Do Not Require Helicobacter pylori for Their Development

Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been linked with a high incidence of ulcer complications. Histologic gastritis is present in most patients with standard peptic ulcers, and this gastritis is generally related to Helicobacter pylori (HP). We questioned whether gastric ulcers associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) develop via a novel mechanism, distinct from the usual HP-gastritis-ulcer diathesis. Two groups of patients with newly discovered gastric ulcers were assessed: 1) daily NSAID use > 1 month (n = 19), 2) no NSAID use (n = 36). Biopsy specimens from the rim of the ulcer and adjacent normal mucosa were coded, randomized, and evaluated for histologic features and HP. HP prevalence was significantly lower in the NSAID group (10/19 (53%) vs. 30/36 (83%), p = 0.01). In biopsies from the ulcer rim, inflammatory cell density and epithelial abnormalities were significantly less in the NSAID group than in the no-NSAID group. Biopsies from adjacent mucosa exhibited the same trends, but the differences did not reach statistical significance (inflammation, p = 0.06; epithelium, p = 0.05). HP-positive patients had similar inflammation and epithelium scores, whether or not they took NSAIDs. However, HP-negative NSAID patients had significantly lower scores than HP-positive NSAID users (inflammation, 0.6 +/- 0.2 vs. 2.4 +/- 0.4; epithelium, 1.1 +/- 0.6 vs. 3.5 +/- 0.7). Patients with NSAID-associated gastric ulcers have a lower prevalence of HP and less histologic gastritis than patients with non-NSAID gastric ulcers. The gastritis is related to the underlying HP and not to NSAID ingestion. NSAID-associated gastric ulcers may represent a major subset of peptic ulcers that do not require HP for their development.     

RANITIDINE IN THE TREATMENT OF GASTRIC AND DUODENAL ULCERS ASSOCIATED WITH NON-STEROIDAL ANTI INFLAMMATORY DRUGS

To assess the effect of 4 weeks' therapy with ranitidine 150mg twice daily on the healing of symptomatic NSAID associatedgastric and duodenal ulcers, 149 arthritic patients were randomlyallocated to one of three treatment groups: ranitidine withNSAID continued, ranitidine with NSAID discontinued, and placebowith NSAID discontinued. The healing frequency in patients withgastric ulceration was 67, 68 and 47%, and in those with duodenalulceration 61, 81 and 42%, respectively. Only the differencebetween the duodenal ulcer healing rates for ranitidine withNSAID discontinued and placebo was statistically significant(P=0.02). Healing rates were uninfluenced by gender, age, smokinghabits, alcohol consumption, ulcer frequency or size, arthriticdisease, or participating country. KEY WORDS: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated ulcers, Ulcer healing, Ranitidine     

Helicobacter pylori infection and the use of NSAIDs

Helicobacter pylori infection and the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can each result in gastroduodenal ulcers and ulcer complications. Recent studies have suggested that there is an interaction between the two causes such that elimination of H. pylori before NSAID treatment decreases the occurrence of ulcers. This led to the conclusion of the Maastricht 2000 meeting that H. pylori eradication should be considered before embarking on long-term NSAID therapy. One of the main sources of confusion is related to the fact that prospective endoscopic studies testing various drugs for prevention of NSAID ulcers among chronic NSAID users are probably not directly applicable to problems of clinical ulcers and of ulcer complications. It has become clear that, to be interpretable clinically, such studies must provide separate analyses based on H. pylori status, history of ulcer, or an ulcer complication. Overall, the data strongly support the notion that eradication therapy is beneficial for primary prophylaxis. In contrast, one would expect little benefit when NSAIDs caused the clinical ulcer (secondary prevention) and, at best, H. pylori eradication has a modest effect on the prevention of recurrent ulcer bleeding in NSAID users who have suffered ulcer complications. The data support the notion that H. pylori eradication therapy should be given to all H. pylori -infected patients with peptic ulcers irrespective of whether or not they have used NSAIDs. Proton pump inhibitors are superior to placebo for the prevention of ulcer recurrence but are inferior to full-dose misoprostol for the prevention of ulcers among those with NSAID ulcers and no H. pylori infection. Selective COX-2 inhibitors appear to reduce markedly, but not eliminate, ulcer complications among chronic NSAID users.     

Study of outcome after targeted intervention for peptic ulcer resistant to acid suppression therapy

OBJECTIVE: Different factors might affect outcome in ulcers resistant to antisecretory therapy. The aim of the study was to define the odds of resistant ulcers being associated with NSAID use, and/or Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection, or neither. METHODS: A total of 80 patients with resistant peptic ulcers were prospectively followed after targeted intervention for a mean follow-up of 39.5+/-6.9 months. RESULTS: NSAID use was involved in 24 cases (14 with and 10 without concomitant H. pylori infection), H. pylori alone was involved in 44, and 12 patients had neither factor present. Of the NSAID group, resistant ulcers healed in patients who stopped taking NSAIDs. Those continuing to use NSAIDs (10 of 24; 41.6%) had either persistent ulceration or ulcer complications despite H. pylori eradication and omeprazole therapy. Of the H. pylori group, infection eradication induced ulcer remission in most patients, but those with persistent infection and a small subset of H. pylori eradicated patients (16.6%) had persistent/recurrent ulceration. Of the 12 refractory patients with neither NSAID use nor H. pylori infection, three had persistent ulceration but nine were controlled with antisecretory agents. Other factors (e.g., smoking or acid hypersecretion) were not associated with final outcome after targeted intervention of H. pylori infection and NSAID use. CONCLUSIONS: With current antiulcer therapies, NSAID use is the main, but not the exclusive, factor leading to intractability and complications in refractory ulcers. In a subset of resistant ulcers, neither the presence of H. pylori nor use of NSAIDs are involved. In this study, despite specific therapeutic intervention, 22.5% of patients with resistant ulcers had continuing ulcer problems.     

Helicobacter pylori infection delays ulcer healing in patients operated on for perforated duodenal ulcer.

BACKGROUND: A majority of duodenal ulcers are associated with Helicobacter pylori infection; eradication of the infection improves ulcer healing and reduces the ulcer recurrence rate. However, the frequency of H. pylori infection in patients with perforated duodenal ulcer is not clearly established. We studied the frequency of H. pylori infection in patients with perforated duodenal ulcer and its impact on their clinical presentation. METHODS: All patients presenting with perforated duodenal ulcer underwent emergency laparotomy and simple omental patch repair. Postoperatively they received standard antibiotics for 1-2 weeks along with ranitidine; ranitidine alone was continued thereafter till an endoscopy 4-6 weeks later. Positive rapid urease test along with identification of H. pylori on histology was taken as evidence of H. pylori infection. Patients who received anti-H. pylori therapy or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) postoperatively and/or proton pump inhibitors or antibiotics, during 4 weeks preceding the endoscopy, were excluded. RESULTS: 30 patients (27 men; mean [SD] age 32.9 [9.7 years]) presenting during the period June 1999 to October 2000 were studied. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was done 10.9 (6.3) weeks after surgery. Seventeen (56.6%) patients were infected with H. pylori; this group had significantly more men (17/17 versus 10/13 among uninfected) and fewer NSAID users (2/17 vs. 7/13). Median duration of epigastric pain before presentation was 18 weeks in the H. pylori-infected group as compared to one week in the non-infected group (p<0.001). Significantly more patients continued to have epigastric pain after surgery in the infected group (7/17 vs. 0/13). At endoscopy, active duodenal ulcer was present in 13 of 17 patients with evidence of H. pylori infection and none of the noninfected patients (p<0.001). Age, sex, duration between surgery and endoscopy, NSAID use, smoking and maintenance ranitidine use had no impact on ulcer healing after the surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In patients operated on for perforated duodenal ulcer, H. pylori infection was the only significant factor responsible for persistence of ulcer after surgery. We advocate H. pylori eradication therapy in patients operated on for perforated duodenal ulcer.     

Celecoxib and Tramadol as an alternative osteoarthrosis therapy in patients with NSAID gastropathy]

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether it is possible to continue the anti-inflammatory NSAID therapy of osteoarthrosis patients with the NSAID-induced duodenal ulcer. The results of the treatment of 38 patients with osteoarthrosis of II-III degrees in which the NSAID treatment was complicated with duodenal ulcers were analyzed. The treatment of 20 osteoarthrosis patients was carried out with the help of Celecoxib while 18 patients were on Tramadol as an analgesic therapy against a standard antiulcer therapy. The efficacy of osteoarthrosis treatment was assessed based on the pain syndrome dynamics by the VAS and functional Lequin test; the efficacy of duodenal ulcer treatment was assessed on the basis of clinical signs dynamics under EGD (esophagogastroduodenoscopy). A clinical remission (the endoscopy confirmed the healing of the ulcerous affection) was achieved in 19 Celecoxib patients with duodenal ulcer and osteoarthrosis, and 18 Tramadol patients with osteoarthrosis and duodenal ulcer against a standard antiulcer therapy. Celecoxib can serve as a drug of choice for continuing the anti-inflammatory and analgesic therapy in patients with osteoarthrosis and NSAID gastropathy.