Comparative study of intravenous, nasal, oral and buccal TRH administration among healthy subjects

Four different modes of TRH application (400 micrograms iv, 1 mg nasal, 10 mg buccal and 40 mg oral) were investigated in young healthy subjects for evaluation of thyrotropin (TSH) and prolactin (PRL) stimulation. Plasma TSH, PRL, T4, T3, thyroxine-binding-globulin (TBG) were measured by radioimmunoassay. There were significant increases of TSH and PRL following TRH stimulation by all test forms. Bolus injection of TRH led to maximal TSH and PRL plasma levels within 20 min to 30 min, compared with 30 min to 45 min following nasal administration. Buccal and oral application produced more prolonged TSH and PRL increases, achieving plateau levels after 120 min to 180 min. Stimulated PRL levels were higher in women than in men. Uniformity of PRL response was better after iv or nasal than buccal and oral TRH stimulation. Known side effects were lower after nasal than iv TRH application. Buccal and oral administration provoked no side effects. Nasal TRH application seems to be a well suited test form for TSH and PRL stimulation.     

Different prolactin, thyrotropin, and thyroxine responses after prolonged intermittent or continuous infusions of thyrotropin-releasing hormone in rhesus monkeys

Serum PRL, TSH, and T4 secretion during prolonged continuous or intermittent iv infusions of TRH were studied in 14 adult ovariectomized rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). For 9 days, TRH was administered intermittently at 0.33 or 3.3 micrograms/min for 6 of every 60 min and continuously at 0.33 micrograms/min. With both modes, the PRL levels and responsiveness to TRH simulation peaked on day 1 and then fell to levels that were still higher than the preinfusion values; levels for the intermittently treated group on days 3-9 were 2- to 4-fold above prestimulation levels and significantly (P less than 0.01) higher than levels for the continuously treated group. Elevated basal levels and PRL responses to TRH pulses were similar during the 0.33 and 3.3 micrograms/min pulses of the 9-day treatment period. For both TRH modes, TSH levels were elevated significantly (P less than 0.001) on day 1 [this increase was higher with continuous infusion (P less than 0.001)] and then fell to preinfusion levels by day 3. Serum T4 also increased during both continuous and intermittent TRH stimulations. However, serum T4 levels were significantly lower (P less than 0.01) after intermittent TRH (both 0.33 and 3.3 micrograms/min) than after continuous (0.33 micrograms) TRH (8 +/- 1.1 and 10 +/- 1.8 micrograms T4/dl vs. 18 +/- 3.1 micrograms, respectively). These PRL and T4 responses were replicated when the mode of administering 0.33 micrograms/min TRH was reversed after 9 days. An iv bolus of TRH (20 micrograms) after 9 days of continuous or intermittent TRH infusion caused significant release of PRL and TSH, an indication that neither mode of administration resulted in pituitary depletion of releasable hormone. We have concluded that intermittent TRH is more effective in elevating serum PRL, and continuous TRH is more effective in raising TSH and T4 levels. Thus, the manner of TRH secretion by the hypothalamus may determine its relative physiological importance in the stimulation of lactotropes and thyrotropes.     

LACK OF EFFECT OF THE TRH RELATED DIPEPTIDE HISTIDYL-PROLINE DIKETOPIPERAZINE ON TSH AND PRL SECRETION IN NORMAL SUBJECTS, IN PATIENTS WITH MICROPROLACTINOMAS AND IN PRIMARY HYPOTHYROIDISM

We have studied the effects of the TRH related dipeptide histidyl-proline diketopiperazine [cyclo (His-Pro)] on basal and stimulated TSH and PRL secretion in normal volunteers, in patients with microprolactinomas and in patients with primary hypothyroidism. Cyclo (His-Pro), 400 micrograms intravenously did not alter basal TSH or PRL levels in normal males and females and was also without effect upon the elevated basal TSH and PRL levels in patients with primary hypothyroidism and microprolactinomas respectively. The same dose of cyclo (His-Pro) did not affect the TSH or PRL response to TRH (100 micrograms i.v.) in normal male volunteers. These data indicate that cyclo (His-Pro) does not affect TSH and PRL secretion in man at this dosage. It is also unlikely that this molecule will be of any therapeutic benefit in states of hyperprolactinaemia.     

The influence of thyroid disorders on the dopaminergic regulation of prolactin, thyrotropin and growth hormone

In order to clarify if hyper- and hypothyroidism change by feed-back mechanisms the dopaminergic controlled release of PRL, TSH and GH, the serum values of these hormones were measured before and following iv administration of 5 mg metoclopramide in 10 hyperthyroid, 11 euthyroid and 10 primary hypothyroid age-matched females, all consecutively investigated. The secretion pattern, as well as the quantitated response (area under the curve - AUC) of PRL were identical for the three groups, and uninfluenced by thyroid status. By contrast the TSH responses (AUC) were significantly and positively correlated to the basal TSH, suggesting that the effect of metoclopramide was dependent on the secretory capacity of the thyrotropic cells. The serum GH level was found to decrease in all three groups following metoclopramide, probably due to the inhibition of release. Stimulation of the same subjects with 200 micrograms TRH iv resulted in response curves of serum PRL and TSH, which were significantly and positively correlated to the basal serum TSH. The serum values of GH increased following TRH in the hypothyroid group, while the values of the hyperthyroid were depressed and unchanged. The present results suggest that the dopaminergic tonus on PRL, TSH and GH secretion is unaffected by thyroid feed-back mechanisms. The TRH-induced release of each of the three hormones is, however, dependent on thyroid status.     

Inhibitory influence of thyrotropin releasing hormone administration on growth hormone response to low doses of growth hormone-releasing hormone in normal man

Literature data show that TRH may have either stimulatory or inhibitory actions on GH release according to pathophysiological conditions of the subject. In view of this dual effect of TRH, we studied the possible interaction of TRH and GRF on GH secretion. Six healthy male volunteers received iv in different occasions and in random order: 1) GRF 0.05 micrograms/Kg; 2) GRF 0.1 micrograms/Kg; 3) GRF 1 microgram/Kg; 4) GRF 0.05 micrograms/Kg + TRH 400 micrograms, simultaneously; 5) GRF 0.05 micrograms/Kg + TRH 20 micrograms, simultaneously; 6) GRF 1 microgram/Kg + TRH 400 micrograms, simultaneously, 7) the vehicle as control treatment. Blood samples were obtained at several time intervals and plasma GH, PRL and TSH were measured by RIA methods. Plasma GH significantly increased in all subjects after all the tested doses of GRF and after the combination of the highest and of the lowest doses of GRF + TRH (treatments 6 and 5). GH responses increased progressively with the dose of GRF administered, even if a clear dose-response relationship could not be demonstrated, owing to the considerable interindividual variability in the responsiveness. The administration of GRF 0.05 micrograms/Kg increased significantly plasma GH levels vs control treatment. The simultaneous administration of a low effective dose of GRF (0.05 micrograms/kg) plus a high dose of TRH (400 micrograms) was able to significantly inhibit the GH secretion elicited by GRF 0.05 micrograms/Kg alone. The other GRF + TRH combinations tested (treatments 5 and 6) did not modify the GH response to the same doses of GRF given alone. Plasma PRL and TSH did not change either after GRF at any dose or after the vehicle.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effects of disodium EDTA and calcium infusion on prolactin and thyrotropin responses to thyrotropin-releasing hormone in healthy man

To determine the impact of induced hypo- and hypercalcemia on TRH (400 micrograms)-stimulated TSH and PRL release, healthy subjects (n = 11) were infused with 5% glucose in water (n = 11), disodium EDTA (n = 11), or calcium gluconate (n = 7). TRH was given as an iv bolus 60 min (5% glucose and EDTA) and 120 min (calcium) after initiation of the respective infusion. Basal plasma concentrations of TSH remained unchanged during induced hypo- and hypercalcemia, whereas those of PRL fell during the latter (P less than 0.05). The mean sum of increments (0-90 min) in PRL and TSH was considerably greater during hypocalcemia than during hypercalcemia (PRL, P less than 0.002; TSH, P less than 0.005). The increments in the plasma hormone concentration above basal after iv TRH were increased compared to those in normocalcemia (PRL, 98.4 +/- 37.9 ng/ml; TSH, 38.9 +/- 11.8 microU/ml) during hypocalcemia [PRL, 128 +/- 47.8 ng/ml (P less than 0.002); TSH, 46.7 +/- 12.8 microU/ml; (P less than 0.005)], but were impaired during hypercalcemia [PRL, 70.1 +/- 27 ng/ml (P less than 0.002); TSH, 28.9 +/- 8.5 microU/ml (P less than 0.025)]. The mean sum of increments in PRL was related to concentrations of both serum calcium (r = -0.59; P less than 0.01) and PTH (r = 0.51; P less than 0.05). A relation was also seen between the incremental responses of TSH and serum calcium (r = -0.52; P less than 0.05), PTH (r = 0.55; P less than 0.01), and phosphorus (r = -0.55; P less than 0.01). We conclude that in healthy man, TRH-mediated release of both PRL and TSH are inversely related to serum calcium concentrations in such a manner that hormone secretion is enhanced by acute hypocalcemia, but blunted by hypercalcemia.     

Arginine stimulates growth hormone secretion by suppressing endogenous somatostatin secretion

To determine how arginine (Arg) stimulates GH secretion, we investigated its interaction with GHRH in vivo and in vitro. Six normal men were studied on four occasions: 1) Arg-TRH, 30 g arginine were administered in 500 mL saline in 30 min, followed by an injection of 200 micrograms TRH; 2) GHRH-Arg-TRH, 100 micrograms GHRH-(1-44) were given iv as a bolus immediately before the Arg infusion, followed by 200 micrograms TRH, iv; 3) GHRH test, 100 micrograms GHRH were given as an iv bolus; and 4) TRH test, 200 micrograms TRH were given iv as a bolus dose. Blood samples were collected at 15-min intervals for 30 min before and 120 min after the start of each infusion. Anterior pituitary cells from rats were coincubated with Arg (3, 6, 15, 30, and 60 mg/mL) and GHRH (0.05, 1, 5, and 10 nmol/L) for a period of 3 h. Rat GH was measured in the medium. After Arg-TRH the mean serum GH concentration increased significantly from 0.6 to 23.3 +/- 7.3 (+/- SE) micrograms/L at 60 min. TRH increased serum TSH and PRL significantly (maximum TSH, 11.1 +/- 1.8 mU/L; maximum PRL, 74.6 +/- 8.4 micrograms/L). After GHRH-Arg-TRH, the maximal serum GH level was significantly higher (72.7 +/- 13.4 micrograms/L) than that after Arg-TRH alone, whereas serum TSH and PRL increased to comparable levels (TSH, 10.2 +/- 3.0 mU/L; PRL, 64.4 +/- 13.6 micrograms/L). GHRH alone increased serum GH to 44.9 +/- 9.8 micrograms/L, significantly less than when GHRH, Arg, and TRH were given. TRH alone increased serum TSH to 6.6 +/- 0.6 mU/L, significantly less than the TSH response to Arg-TRH. The PRL increase after TRH only also was lower (47.2 +/- 6.8 micrograms/L) than the PRL response after Arg-TRH. In vitro Arg had no effect on basal and GHRH-stimulated GH secretion. Our results indicate that Arg administered with GHRH led to higher serum GH levels than did a maximally stimulatory dose of GHRH or Arg alone. The serum TSH response to Arg-TRH also was greater than that to TRH alone. We conclude that the stimulatory effects of Arg are mediated by suppression of endogenous somatostatin secretion.     

Serum thyrotropin and prolactin in the syndrome of generalized resistance to thyroid hormone: responses to thyrotropin-releasing hormone stimulation and short term triiodothyronine suppression

Serum TSH and PRL levels and their response to TRH were measured in 11 patients with generalized resistance to thyroid hormone (GRTH), 6 euthyroid subjects, and 6 patients with primary hypothyroidism. TSH and PRL levels and their response to TRH were also measured after the consecutive administration of 50, 100, and 200 micrograms T3 daily, each for a period of 3 days. Using a sensitive TSH assay, all GRTH patients had TSH values that were elevated or within the normal range. On the basis of a normal or elevated TSH level, GRTH patients were classified as GRTH-N1 TSH (5 patients) or GRTH-Hi TSH (6 patients), respectively. Only GRTH patients with previous thyroid ablative therapy had basal TSH values greater than 20 mU/L. TSH responses, in terms of percent increment above baseline, were appropriate for the basal TSH level in all subjects. No GRTH patient had an elevated basal PRL level. PRL responses to TRH were significantly increased only in the hypothyroid controls compared to values in all other groups. On 50 micrograms T3, 7 of 12 (58%) nonresistant (euthyroid and hypothyroid) and 1 of 11 (9%) resistant subjects had a greater than 75% suppression of the TSH response to TRH. On the same T3 dose, 2 of 12 (17%) nonresistant and 4 of 11 (36%) resistant subjects had a greater than 50% suppression of the PRL response to TRH. On 200 micrograms T3, all subjects, except for 1 with GRTH, had a greater than 75% suppression of the TSH response to TRH. On the same T3 dose, while 11 of 12 (92%) nonresistant subjects had a greater than 50% reduction of the PRL response to TRH, only 3 of 10 (30%) resistant patients showed this degree of suppression (P less than 0.005). Without previous ablative therapy, serum TSH in patients with GRTH is usually normal or mildly elevated. The TSH response to TRH is proportional to the basal TSH level and is suppressed by exogenous T3. However, on 200 micrograms T3 basal TSH was not detectable (less than 0.1 mU/L) in all euthyroid subjects, but it was measurable in three of four GRTH patients with normal TSH levels before T3 treatment. PRL levels in GRTH are normal even when TSH is elevated. The PRL response to TRH is not increased in GRTH. In all subjects, exogenous T3 suppresses the PRL response to TRH to a lesser degree than the TSH response, but this difference is much greater in patients with GRTH.     

Interaction of L-dopa and GHRH on GH secretion in normal men

To determine how L-dopa stimulates GH secretion, we investigated its interaction with GHRH in vivo. Six normal men were studied on 4 occasions: 1) L-dopa-TRH: 500 mg L-dopa orally followed by 200 micrograms TRH 60 min later; 2) L-dopa-GHRH-TRH: 100 micrograms GHRH 1-44 iv 30 min after L-dopa followed by 200 micrograms TRH iv; 3) GHRH-TRH: 100 micrograms GHRH iv at 0 min, 30 min later 200 micrograms TRH iv; 4) TRH test: 200 micrograms TRH iv as a bolus. After L-dopa-TRH GH-levels increased significantly from 0.6 micrograms/l to 25.8 +/- 9.6 (SE) micrograms/l at 60 min. Only a slight TSH and no PRL increase was observed after L-dopa-TRH. After L-dopa-GHRH-TRH the GH-increase was significantly higher (45.7 +/- 11.1 micrograms/l) compared to L-dopa-TRH alone. GHRH-TRH increased GH-levels to 52.5 +/- 12.1 micrograms/l, which was not significantly different from the GH-levels obtained when L-dopa-GHRH-TRH were given. TRH increased serum TSH and PRL to 6.3 +/- 0.7 microU/ml and 715 +/- 136 microU/ml, respectively, which was significantly higher compared to the TSH responses after L-dopa-TRH. The PRL and TSH increase after TRH only was also higher (TSH-max: 5.7 +/- 0.5 microU/ml; PRL-max: 899 +/- 154 microU/ml) compared to the TSH and PRL responses after L-dopa-TRH. Our results show that the combination of L-dopa with GHRH leads to the same GH response as GHRH only. However, both responses are significantly higher than the one after L-dopa alone.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Age-related differences in the spontaneous and thyrotropin-releasing hormone-stimulated release of prolactin and thyrotropin in ovariectomized rats

Effect of estradiol on the spontaneous and thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH)-stimulated release of prolactin (PRL) and thyrotropin (TSH) in young and aged ovariectomized (Ovx) rats was investigated. Old (22-26 months) and young (3 months) female rats were Ovx 3 weeks before use. They were injected subcutaneously with estradiol benzoate (EB, 25 micrograms/kg) or sesame oil for 3 days and were catheterized via the right jugular vein. Twenty hours after the last administration of EB, rats were injected with TRH (10 micrograms/kg) through the catheter. Blood samples were collected before and 5, 10, 20, 40 and 60 min after TRH injection. On the day following blood sampling, all rats were decapitated. The anterior pituitary glands (APs) were excised, and incubated with or without TRH (10 ng/ml) at 37 degrees C for 30 min. The basal level of PRL concentration in plasma samples was 5-fold higher in old Ovx rats than in young Ovx rats. Five min after TRH injection, the increase in plasma PRL was greater in old animals than in young animals. Plasma PRL remained higher in old animals than in young animals at 10, 20, 40 and 60 min following TRH challenge. Administration of EB to old and to young Ovx rats produced increases in both basal and TRH-stimulated secretions of PRL, but did not affect the difference in plasma PRL patterns between old and young animals. The release of PRL from APs was increased significantly in all rats after a 30-min incubation with TRH. In Ovx rats injected with oil, the basal release of PRL in vitro was increased with age.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Hypothalamic regulation of pulsatile thyrotopin secretion.

To determine the mechanism underlying pulsatile TSH secretion, 24-h serum TSH levels were measured in three groups of five healthy volunteers by sampling blood every 10 min. The influence of an 8-h infusion of dopamine (200 mg), somatostatin (500 micrograms), or nifedipine (5 mg) on the pulsatile release of TSH was tested using a cross-over design. The amount of TSH released per pulse was significantly lowered by these drugs, resulting in significantly decreased mean basal TSH serum levels. However, pulses of TSH were still detectable at all times. The TSH response to TRH (200 micrograms) tested in separate experiments was significantly lowered after 3 h of nifedipine infusion compared to the saline control value. Nifedipine treatment did not alter basal, pulsatile, or TRH-stimulated PRL secretion. The persistence of TSH pulses under dopamine and somatostatin treatment and the blunted TSH responses to nifedipine infusion support the hypothesis that pulsatile TSH secretion is under the control of hypothalamic TRH. The 24-h TSH secretion pattern achieved under stimulation with exogenous TRH in two patients with hypothalamic destruction through surgical removal of a craniopharyngioma provided further circumstantial evidence for this assumption. No TSH pulses and low basal TSH secretion were observed under basal conditions (1700-2400 h), whereas subsequent repetitive TRH challenge (25 micrograms/2 h to 50 micrograms/1 h) led to a pulsatile release of TSH with fusion of TSH pulses, resulting in a TSH secretion pattern strikingly similar to the circadian variation. These data suggest that pulsatile and circadian TSH secretions are predominantly controlled by TRH.     

Thyrotropin-releasing hormone stimulates growth hormone release from the anterior pituitary of hypothyroid rats in vitro

We have examined the interaction of thyroid hormone and TRH on GH release from rat pituitary monolayer cultures and perifused rat pituitary fragments. TRH (10(-9) and 10(-8)M) consistently stimulated the release of TSH and PRL, but not GH, in pituitary cell cultures of euthyroid male rats. Basal and TRH-stimulated TSH secretion were significantly increased in cells from thyroidectomized rats cultured in medium supplemented with hypothyroid serum, and a dose-related stimulation of GH release by 10(-9)-10(-8) M TRH was observed. The minimum duration of hypothyroidism required to demonstrate the onset of this GH stimulatory effect of TRH was 4 weeks, a period significantly longer than that required to cause intracellular GH depletion, decreased basal secretion of GH, elevated serum TSH, or increased basal secretion of TSH by cultured cells. In vivo T4 replacement of hypothyroid rats (20 micrograms/kg, ip, daily for 4 days) restored serum TSH, intracellular GH, and basal secretion of GH and TSH to normal levels, but suppressed only slightly the stimulatory effect of TRH on GH release. The GH response to TRH was maintained for up to 10 days of T4 replacement. In vitro addition of T3 (10(-6) M) during the 4-day primary culture period significantly stimulated basal GH release, but did not affect the GH response to TRH. A GH stimulatory effect of TRH was also demonstrated in cultured adenohypophyseal cells from rats rendered hypothyroid by oral administration of methimazole for 6 weeks. TRH stimulated GH secretion in perifused [3H]leucine-prelabeled anterior pituitary fragments from euthyroid rats. A 15-min pulse of 10(-8) M TRH stimulated the release of both immunoprecipitable [3H]rat GH and [3H]rat PRL. The GH release response was markedly enhanced in pituitary fragments from hypothyroid rats, and this enhanced response was significantly suppressed by T4 replacement for 4 days. The PRL response to TRH was enhanced to a lesser extent by thyroidectomy and was not affected by T4 replacement. These data suggest the existence of TRH receptors on somatotrophs which are suppressed by normal amounts of thyroid hormones and may provide an explanation for the TRH-stimulated GH secretion observed clinically in primary hypothyroidism.     

Effect of simultaneous administration of GHRH (1-40) and TRH on GH, PRL and TSH secretion in normal man

The GHRH test represents a new tool in the study of secretion in man. Nine normal fasting males received on separate occasions in random order 1) GHRH 1-40 (1 microgram/Kg bw) iv at time 0; 2) TRH (6 micrograms/min) infusion between -30 and +120 min; 3) GHRH 1-40 (1 microgram/Kg bw) iv at time 0 plus TRH (6 micrograms/min) infusion between -30 and +120 min. Blood samples were drawn for GH, PRL and TSH at -90, -60, -30, 0 min and then every 15 min for 2 h. GHRH significantly increased GH in all subjects. The same GH response was found during GHRH plus TRH test. No effect was found either on PRL and TSH secretion after GHRH administration, or on GH pattern after TRH administration. A significant decrease of TSH, but not of PRL response was observed after GHRH plus TRH administration in comparison to TRH alone. These results underline that the inhibitory effect exerted by TRH on GH secretion during some experimental conditions is not linked to a pituitary interference between GHRH and TRH. The difference in TSH secretion, following GHRH plus TRH in comparison with TRH alone, could be due to a GHRH-induced central inhibitory mechanism, probably GHRH-related.     

Osmotic control of the release of prolactin and thyrotropin in euthyroid subjects and patients with pituitary tumors.

The effects of acute changes in serum osmolality on basal serum PRL and TSH levels and on responses of prolactin (PRL) and thyrotropin (TSH) to the thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) analogue, N3im-methyl-TRH, were studied in ten euthyroid subjects and in three patients with PRL-secreting pituitary tumors. An oral water load of 20 ml/kg had no effect on basal serum PRL or TSH levels but did result in an increased PRL response to methyl-TRH in the ten euthyroid patients. Intravenous infusion of 5% sodium chloride in the ten euthyroid subjects significantly depressed basal serum PRL levels but had no effect on the PRL response to methyl-TRH. Infusion of hypertonic saline significantly decreased the TSH response to methyl-TRH. In the three patients with pituitary tumors, oral water loading and hypertonic saline infusion had no significant effect on the basal serum PRL and TSH or the PRL and TSH responses to methyl-TRH. The patients with pituitary tumors had a higher basal serum osmolality and a proportionately higher serum concentration of arginine vasopressin than the euthyroid patients. These data suggest that changes in osmolality in euthyroid patients may have a direct effect on the anterior pituitary's PRL and TSH response to a releasing factor.     

The impact of euglycemia and hyperglycemia on stimulated pituitary hormone release in insulin-dependent diabetics

To study the influence of different blood glucose (BG) concentrations on the release of pituitary hormones, the effect of the simultaneous iv administration of LRH (200 micrograms), TRH (400 micrograms), and arginine (30 g/30 min) upon the serum concentrations of LH, FSH, TSH, PRL, and GH was determined in six male insulin-dependent diabetics. BG concentration was clamped by feedback control and an automated glucose-controlled insulin infusion system at euglycemic (BG 4-5 mmol/liter) or hyperglycemic (BG, 14-18 mmol/liter) levels. Increments in serum concentrations of LH, FSH, TSH, and PRL were similar in the euglycemic and hyperglycemic steady states, whereas the GH response to arginine was suppressed during the hyperglycemic clamp (P less than 0.01). Omission of exogenous insulin during hyperglycemia did not modify the observed hormonal responses. Thus, the release of LH, FSH, TSH, and PRL in response to adequate acute stimuli at the pituitary level is not modulated by hyperglycemia in insulin-dependent diabetes, while arginine-induced GH release is suppressed. Since the effect of arginine on GH is most likely mediated by an action on the hypothalamus, the data suggest that elevated glucose concentrations may exert their modulatory influence on GH secretion at the hypothalamic rather than at the pituitary level.     

Calcitonin inhibits basal and thyrotropin-releasing hormone-induced release of prolactin from anterior pituitary cells: evidence for a selective action exerted proximal to secretagogue-induced increases in cytosolic Ca2+

Salmon calcitonin (sCT)-like peptide is present in the central nervous system and pituitary gland of the rat, and this peptide inhibits basal and TRH-stimulated PRL release from cultured rat anterior pituitary (AP) cells. The present studies were designed to examine further the inhibitory actions of sCT on basal and TRH-stimulated PRL release and investigated 1) the temporal dynamics of the responses, 2) the effects of sCT on PRL release induced by other secretogogues, and particularly those acting via elevations of cytosolic Ca2+, and 3) the selectivity of sCT action on basal and stimulated AP hormone release. The inhibition of basal PRL release by sCT (0.1-10 nM) was dose-dependent and was characterized by a rapid onset with a gradual recovery to normal rates of release after the period of sCT inhibition. The inhibitory effect of sCT on basal PRL release was reversed by treatment with either the Ca2+ ionophore A23187 or with the phorbol ester, phorbol myristate acetate (PMA). sCT infusion did not affect the basal release of GH, TSH, FSH, or LH by perifused AP cells. When administered in short pulses, TRH, at concentrations from 1-100 nM, elicited a dose-dependent increase in PRL release. When coadministered with short 10 nM TRH, sCT (1-100 nM) inhibited TRH-induced PRL release in a dose-dependent manner, with a maximal inhibition of 78% at a concentration of 10 nM, and an ED50 concentration of approximately 3 nM. During longer (30 min) pulses of TRH (100 nM), PRL release increased sharply over 4-fold within 2 min, followed within 12 min by a rapid decline to a level 1.5-2-fold higher than basal, and this level was maintained for the remainder of the stimulation period. sCT pretreatment inhibited the overall PRL response to TRH. In contrast to its inhibition of TRH-induced PRL release, sCT failed to prevent the stimulation of PRL release by either ionophore A23187, PMA, vasoactive intestinal peptide, or forskolin. In addition, sCT failed to block TRH-induced TSH release or GnRH-induced LH release.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Increased plasma prolactin levels in ovariectomized thyroidectomized rats treated with estrogen

It is well established that TRH exerts a stimulatory effect on the secretion of both TSH and PRL. Clinically, hyperprolactinemia is usually present in hypothyroid women, but not men. In experimental studies, results vary because of the sexes, and treatments of animals differ. The purpose of this study was to further investigate the physiological control of PRL secretion in hypothyroid female rats. Adult female Sprague-Dawley rats that were surgically ovariectomized (OVX) and/or thyroidectomized (Tx) for 2 weeks were used. Serial blood samples were collected through indwelling intraatrial catheters, and plasma PRL and TSH levels were measured by RIA. We found that OVX + Tx and polyestradiol phosphate (PEP; 0.1 mg/rat, sc)-treated rats exhibited significantly higher basal PRL and TSH levels and afternoon surge PRL levels than sham Tx rats with the same treatments. On the other hand, if OVX + Tx rats were not treated with estrogen, their plasma PRL levels were not significantly different from those in sham Tx controls. If challenged with TRH (1 microgram/rat, iv), significantly higher PRL responses were found in OVX + Tx + PEP rats than in sham Tx rats. The contents of TRH in the median eminence of Tx rats, however, were not different from those in sham Tx rats. When challenged with domperidone (10 micrograms/rat, iv), a dopamine antagonist, no difference in PRL increments was found in the two groups of animals. Treatment with CB154, a potent dopamine agonist, did not eliminate the difference in basal PRL levels between the two groups. Pretreatment with a smaller dose of domperidone (1 microgram/rat), however, enhanced the PRL-releasing effect of TRH more in Tx than in sham Tx rats. When T4 (2 or 10 micrograms/100 g BW.day for 21 days) was replaced in Tx rats starting the second day after Tx, both basal and TRH-stimulated PRL secretion were significantly decreased in a dose-dependent manner. In conclusion, the increased PRL levels in OVX + Tx + PEP rats may be due to increased responsiveness of the anterior pituitary gland to TRH, and not to a decreased responsiveness to dopamine. In addition, the elevation of plasma PRL in OVX + Tx + PEP rats is negatively correlated with plasma levels of thyroid hormone.     

Hyperresponsiveness of TSH and prolactin and impaired responsiveness of GH in Japanese patients with isolated ACTH deficiency]

Two hundred and forty-one cases of isolated ACTH deficiency have been reported in Japan since 1969. Pituitary hormone responsiveness to stimulation tests before and after hydrocortisone supplementation was investigated in these cases. Plasma ACTH level showed no or little change in response to lysine vasopressin, metyrapone, CRF or insulin-induced hypoglycemia in 97.3-100% of the cases. Serum GH level changed little or not at all in response to GRF, insulin-induced hypoglycemia, glucagon, 1-dopa and arginine in 26.9, 29.3, 40.0, 50.0 and 56.1%, respectively. Serum TSH and prolactin (PRL) levels showed hyperresponse to TRH in 34.7 and 35.6%, respectively. After hydrocortisone therapy, GH secretion was more responsive than before therapy in 78.9% of the cases. After supplementation, TSH level was less responsive to TRH stimulation than before therapy in 59.3% of the cases. After hydrocortisone supplementation, TSH response to TRH decreased in 75% of ACTH-deficient patients without primary hypothyroidism but did not decrease in more than half of those with primary hypothyroidism. TSH response to TRH decreased after supplementation in 76.5% of the patients with TSH hyperresponsiveness before therapy, and increased after therapy in 66.7% of those with normal TSH responses before therapy. After supplementation, PRL response to TRH was less than that before therapy in 43.5% of ACTH--deficient patients, and greater than that before therapy in 30.4%. PRL response to TRH decreased after therapy in 66.7% of the patients with PRL hyperresponsiveness before therapy, and increased in 63.6% of those with normal PRL response before therapy. Primary hypothyroidism and Hashimoto's thyroiditis were complicated in 21.6 and 11.6%, respectively, of the 241 patients with isolated ACTH deficiency. In patients who had TSH hyperresponsiveness and/or high basal TSH levels and PRL hyperresponsiveness and/or high basal PRL levels, primary hypothyroidism was complicated in 58.4 and 42.3%, respectively. Hashimoto's thyroiditis was complicated in 29.8 and 20.5%, respectively, of these patients. Pituitary cell antibody (PCA) was detected in 36.6% of ACTH-deficient patients who were examined. Pituitary cell surface antibody (PCSA) to AtT-20 cells and GH3 cells was detected in 50.0 and 28.0% of the examined cases, respectively. The prevalence of PCA and PCSA did not differ between TSH-hyperresponsive patients and those with normal TSH basal levels and response, whereas PCA and PCSA were significantly more prevalent in PRL-hyperresponsive patients than in those with normal PRL levels and response. An empty sella was found in 30.2% of the examined case.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Studies on the mechanism of growth hormone and thyrotropin responses to somatostatin antiserum in anesthetized rats.

An iv administration of 1 ml sheep antiserum to somatostatin (anti-SS) resulted in marked increases of both serum GH and TSH, with a peak 10--20 min after administration in male rats anesthetized with urethane or pentobarbital. Administration of anti-SS had no effect on serum PRL. Ablation of the basal medial hypothalamus abolished the rises of both serum GH and TSH after anti-SS administration. Intravenous injection of 1 ml rabbit antiserum to TRH (anti-TRH) decreased serum TSH levels 15 min after injection, whereas injection of normal rabbit serum did not affect TSH levels. Serum TSH levels did not rise after injection of anti-SS in rats pretreated with anti-TRH. On the other hand, pretreatment with anti-TRH did not affect the basal serum GH levels nor the anti-SS-induced GH release. The enhanced secretion of GH and TSH after anti-SS injections was not blocked by pretreatment with indomethacin, an inhibitor of prostaglandin synthesis. The following conclusions were made: 1) both GH and TSH responses to anti-SS require an intact basal medial hypothalamus; (2) TSH response to anti-SS is mediated by hypothalamic TRH; and 3) the GH response may be mediated by hypothalamic GH-releasing hormone which is not TRH or prostaglandins.     

The interaction of GHRH with TRH in acromegaly: a controlled study

In a single-blind placebo-controlled study, the effect of an iv bolus injection of 100 micrograms GHRH(1-29)NH2 on the response to 200 micrograms TRH was assessed in 10 untreated patients with acromegaly to determine whether GHRH interacts with TRH in acromegaly, as previously described in healthy subjects. The combination of GHRH(1-29)NH2 with TRH resulted in a larger increment of peak and of integrated plasma TSH and PRL levels than after TRH alone. GHRH alone had no effect on TSH secretion and only a modest effect on PRL secretion. These findings suggest that in acromegaly, like in healthy individuals, GHRH potentiates the TSH response to TRH and that the effects of GHRH and TRH on PRL secretion are additive.