奥沙利铂联合卡培他滨治疗老年晚期胃癌的临床研究

目的：观察奥沙利铂联合卡培他滨治疗老年晚期胃癌患者的疗效及不良反应。方法：42例老年晚期胃癌患者,为术后有残留病灶或Ⅳ期无手术机会有可测量转移灶。静脉滴注奥沙利铂100mg／m^2,d1;希罗达1000mg／m^2,bid,d1-14,每3周为1周期,2周期以上以WHO标准评价疗效及不良反应。结果：42例患者均可评价,其中完全缓解3例,部分缓解11例,稳定18例,进展10例。总有效率33．3％,临床获益率76．2％,中位肿瘤进展时间5．7月,中位生存时间9．3月,不良反应为手足综合征、神经毒性、骨髓抑制、胃肠道反应,多为Ⅰ-Ⅱ度。结论：奥沙利铂联合卡培他滨治疗老年晚期胃癌疗效好,不良反应较小,患者耐受性高,可改善患者的生活质量。     

卡培他滨联合奥沙利铂治疗晚期胃癌的随机对照临床研究

 我科自2002年10月-2004年2月使用卡培他滨（Capecitabine，CAPE）联合奥沙利铂（Oxaliplatin，LOHP）组成OX方案治疗晚期胃癌28例，并与奥沙利铂，醛氢叶酸（Leucovorin，LV）和5一氟脲嘧啶（Fluorouracil，5Fu）组成的OLF方案进行随机对照临床研究，全组观察至2004年10月，现总结分析如下。     

卡培他滨、奥沙利铂治疗晚期胃癌分析

目的：对卡培他滨、奥沙利铂治疗晚期胃癌疗效及安全性进行观察及分析。方法：32例确诊晚期胃癌患者使用卡培他滨＋奥沙利铂（艾恒）治疗2疗程以上,对治疗前后疗效及临床受益、毒副反应等指标进行观察及比较。结果：该方案近期疗效较好,总有效率达56.3%。临床受益者84.3%,毒副反应较轻,未出现因化疗毒性而死亡病例。结论：卡培他滨、奥沙利铂联合化疗治疗晚期胃癌有效率高,使用方便并且毒副反应较轻,是治疗晚期胃癌的有效方案。     

奥沙利铂联合卡培他滨治疗晚期胃癌的临床观察

目的 评价奥沙利铂联合卡培他滨（XELOX）方案治疗晚期胃癌的疗效和不良反应。方法56例晚期胃癌患者予奥沙利铂130mg／m^2,第1天,静脉滴注;卡培他滨1000mg／m^2每天口服2次,第1～14天,21天为1个周期。至少治疗2周期评价疗效。结果CR0例,PR27例,SD13例,PD16例,总有效率为48．2％,疾病控制率（DCR）为71．4％。其中初治组总有效率为60．0％,明显高于复治组的34．6％（P〈0．05）。不良反应主要为骨髓抑制、恶心呕吐、神经毒性。结论XELOX方案治疗晚期胃癌疗效肯定,安全性好,不良反应可耐受,值得临床进一步研究。     

卡培他滨、奥沙利铂治疗晚期胃癌分析

目的:对卡培他滨、奥沙利铂治疗晚期胃癌疗效及安全性进行观察及分析。方法:32例确诊晚期胃癌患者使用卡培他滨 奥沙利铂(艾恒)治疗2疗程以上,对治疗前后疗效及临床受益、毒副反应等指标进行观察及比较。结果:该方案近期疗效较好,总有效率达56.3%。临床受益者84.3%,毒副反应较轻,未出现因化疗毒性而死亡病例。结论:卡培他滨、奥沙利铂联合化疗治疗晚期胃癌有效率高,使用方便并且毒副反应较轻,是治疗晚期胃癌的有效方案。     

奥沙利铂联合卡培他滨二线治疗晚期胃癌的临床观察

目的 探讨奥沙利铂联合卡培他滨二线治疗晚期胃癌的客观疗效和安全性。方法对既往曾经应用不同方案多次化疗的24例晚期胃癌患者,采用LX方案,即奥沙利铂85mg,／m^2,iv,dl、d15;卡培他滨1250mg／m^2,分2次口服,dl～14;28d为1个化疗周期,连用2个周期以上。按照WHO实体肿瘤近期客观疗效评定标准进行评价。结果 全组24例均可评价疗效。每例进行2～6个周期的治疗,共完成92个周期。其中完全缓解2例,部分缓解5例,稳定10例,进展7例,客观有效率为29.2％。疾病进展时间2～18个月,中位疾病进展时间5个月。缓解期4～14个月,中位缓解期8个月。毒性反应主要是骨髓抑制和恶心呕吐,均为可逆性。结论奥沙利铂联合卡培他滨二线治疗晚期胃癌疗效肯定,安全性较好,值得积极推广。     

奥沙利铂联合卡培他滨治疗晚期胃癌的临床观察

目的:探讨奥沙利铂联合卡培他滨治疗晚期胃癌近期疗效.方法:82例晚期胃癌患者随机分为两组,A组采用奥沙利铂+卡培他滨方案化疗,B组采用顺铂+5-氟尿嘧啶+甲酰四氢叶酸化疗,观察其有效率及不良反应.结果: A组有效率为54.55%,B组有效率为28.95%,P<0.05,两者有显著性差异.且A组的胃肠道反应明显减轻.其他相关不良反应能耐受.结论:奥沙利铂联合卡培他滨方案治疗晚期胃癌疗效较好,不良反应能够耐受,可在晚期胃癌病人中应用.     

奥沙利铂联合卡培他滨治疗晚期胃癌的临床观察

目的：探讨奥沙利铂联合卡培他滨治疗晚期胃癌近期疗效。方法：82例晚期胃癌患者随机分为两组,A组采用奥沙利铂＋卡培他滨方案化疗,B组采用顺铂＋5～氟尿嘧啶＋甲酰四氢叶酸化疗,观察其有效率及不良反应。结果：A组有效率为54．55％,B组有效率为28．95％,P〈0．05,两者有显著性差异。且A组的胃肠道反应明显减轻。其他相关不良反应能耐受。结论：奥沙利铂联合卡培他滨方案治疗晚期胃癌疗效较好,不良反应能够耐受,可在晚期胃癌病人中应用。     

卡培他滨联合奥沙利铂治疗老年晚期大肠癌疗效观察

目的：评价卡培他滨联合奥沙利铂方案治疗晚期结直肠癌的疗效与毒副反应。方法：奥沙利铂130mg／m^2静滴，持续3h-4h，第1天；希罗达2000mg／m^2，口服早晚各1次，连服14d。3—4周为1个周期，连用3个周期后评价疗效。结果：38例患者中CR2例、PR16例、SD15例、PD5例，RR47．4％，TTP10．2个月，MST17、3个月。主要毒副作用有消化道反应、周围神经毒性、手足综合征、血液学毒性。上述反应症状较轻，多为Ⅰ-Ⅱ度，均可耐受。结论：卡培他滨联合奥沙利铂方案疗效好，副作用少，用药简单、方便，适用于年老体弱患者。     

多西他赛联合奥沙利铂 卡培他滨治疗晚期胃癌的临床研究

目的：临床观察多西他赛联合奥沙利铂、 卡培他滨治疗晚期胃癌的疗效及不良反应。方法： 56例晚期胃癌患者接受多西他赛75 mg/m2, d1, 奥沙利铂85 mg/m2, d2, 卡培他滨每天1 000 mg/m2, bid, d1～d14, 21d为1个周期, 化疗2个周期后评价疗效。结果： 56例患者均可评价疗效, 其中CR 6例 （10.7%）, PR 30例 （53.6%）, SD 12例 （21.4%）, PD 8例 （14.3%）, 总有效率64.3%,中位TTP为6.2个月 （3.6～11.8个月）, 中位OS为11.6个月 （5.9～14.6个月）。常见不良反应为骨髓抑制、 胃肠道反应和外周神经炎, 无化疗相关性死亡。结论： 多西他赛联合奥沙利铂、 卡培他滨治疗晚期胃癌有效率较高, 血液学毒性低, 近期疗效较好, 提高了患者的生活质量。     

卡培他滨联合奥沙利铂治疗进展期胃癌68例

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the response rate, time to progression (TTP), overall survival, and safety of the combination of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin in treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Methods: All the patients with advanced gastric cancer who were not received any prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy were treated with combination of capecitabine (1250 mg/m2 twice daily, days 1-14) plus oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2 as a 2-h intravenous infusion on day 1) every 3 weeks. Results: Two cases of complete response (CR) and 34 cases of partial response (PR) were confirmed, giving an overall response rate of 52.9%, of the 68 patients with advanced gastric cancer. The median TTP and overall survival for all patients were 7.3 and 11.9 months, respectively. Grade 3 leukopenia, thrembocytopenia, nausealvomiting, and diarrhea were observed in 3, 5, 1, and 4 patients, respectively. Yet, no grade 4 toxicity was observed. Conclusion: Capecitabine/ oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy is active in patients with advanced gastric cancer.     

表柔比星联合奥沙利铂与卡培他滨方案治疗晚期胃癌的临床观察

目的：探讨EOX化疗方案（表柔比星＋奥沙利铂＋卡培他滨）治疗晚期胃癌的临床疗效及毒副反应.方法：经病理学证实的晚期胃癌共23例,采用EOX方案化疗：表柔比星50mg/m2,d1;奥沙利铂130mg/m2静脉滴注,d1;卡培他滨1250mg/m2,每天分2次口服,d1-14,3周为1个周期,完成6个周期或直至肿瘤进展或毒副反应无法耐受即治疗停止.每2周期评价疗效及毒副反应.结果：23例均可评价疗效.CR 1例,PR 10例,SD 6例,PD 6例,总有效率（RR）为47.8％,疾病控制率（DCR）为73.9％.中位疾病无进展时间（mPFS）6.4个月,中位总生存期（mOS） 10.6个月,1年生存率为43.5％.其中初治患者总有效率（RR）为56.2％,中位疾病无进展时间（mPFS） 7.1个月,中位总生存期11.2个月.毒副反应主要为血液学毒性及胃肠道反应,手足综合症发生率不高.结论：EOX方案治疗晚期胃癌有较高的有效率,患者耐受性良好,生活质量高,是较理想的晚期胃癌一线治疗方案.     

奥沙利铂联合卡培他滨治疗晚期胃癌的临床分析

目的:研究奥沙利铂(LOHP)联合卡培他滨(CAPE)治疗进展及转移性胃癌的疗效和毒性作用。方法:LOHP85mg/m2,静滴2小时,第1、8天,CAPE2500mg/m2,第1～14天,每3周重复,行2周期后判断疗效。结果:19例病人中完全有效3例(15.8%),部分有效7例(36.8%),稳定5例(26.3%),进展4例(21.1%),总有效率52.6%,中位生存期11月,毒性反应以手足综合症、神经毒性反应、骨髓抑制为主,无化疗相关死亡。结论:奥沙利铂联合卡培他滨治疗晚期胃癌疗效肯定,毒性反应可耐受。     

希罗达联合奥沙利铂治疗晚期胃癌的临床疗效观察

目的：观察希罗达（Xeloda）联合奥沙利铂（L—OHP）治疗晚期胃癌的疗效和毒副作用。方法：L—OHP130mg／m2，加入5％GS500rrd中静脉滴注2小时，第一天，Xeloda1000mg／m2，2次／d口服，第1—14天，21天为一周期，连用2个周期后评价疗效。结果：23例患者中，CR1例PR11例SD8例PD3例，RR52．2％，中位疾病进展时间（TTP））5．8个月（3—8个月），中位生存期（MST）11个月（6—17个月），1年生存率34．8％。毒副反应主要为骨髓抑制、消化道反应、神经毒性和手足综合征，大多能耐受。结论：希罗达联合奥沙利铂治疗晚期胃癌具有较好的疗效，毒副作用小，能显著提高患者的生活质量，值得临床推广。     

Phase II study of short-time oxaliplatin, capecitabine and epirubicin (EXE) as first-line therapy in patients with non-resectable gastric cancer

Epirubicin, cisplatin and continuous infusion of 5-FU is a widely used palliative regimen in patients with gastric cancer. If cisplatin is substituted by oxaliplatin and 5-FU by capecitabine this regimen can be administered in the outpatient setting. Dose-limiting toxicity of oxaliplatin is peripheral sensory neuropathy and it is recommended to give oxaliplatin as a 120 min infusion. However, in patients with colorectal cancer a 30 min infusion of oxaliplatin can safely be administered without increasing neurotoxicity, standard infusion time is 30 min at our departments. In our phase I study the recommended doses of EXE was established (Dupont et al, 2006). Patients with non-resectable gastric adenocarcinoma were eligible. Patients received EXE (epirubicin 50 mg m⁻² day 1; capecitabine 1000 mg m⁻² day⁻¹ continuously and oxaliplatin 130 mg m⁻² day 1) as outpatient therapy every third week for a maximum of 8 cycles. From June 2004 to September 2005, we enroled 54 patients. Median age was 60 years (31–74 years) Median number of courses was 6 (1–8). Response rate was 45%. Median PFS was 6.8 (5.2–7.9) months and median survival was 10.1 (7.9–11.1) months. Most important grade 3 toxicities were as follows: nausea, vomiting, and diarrhoea (6%). Neurotoxicity grade 2 was seen in 36.5%. We therefore conclude, that EXE every third week is a convenient regimen that easily can be administrated in the outpatient setting but the regimen needs further evaluation in a phase III study.     

Phase II study of capecitabine and oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Capecitabine and oxaliplatin are both active anticancer agents in the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer. The aim of this phase II study is to determine the efficacy and tolerability of combining oxaliplatin with capecitabine in the treatment of advanced non-pretreated colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-three chemotherapy-na?ve patients were enrolled. Capecitabine 2500 mg/m(2)/day was administered orally twice a day continuously for 14 days and oxaliplatin 120 mg/m(2) was administered as a 2-h infusion on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were assessable for toxicity and 39 for clinical activity: the main toxicity was grade 3 or 4 diarrhea, which occurred in 28% of the patients. The response rates were 44% [95% confidence interval (CI), 29.3% to 59.0%] and 48.7% (95% CI 33.0% to 64.4%) (intention-to-treat and per protocol analysis, respectively). The median overall survival was 20 months (95% CI 12-28). CONCLUSIONS: Combining capecitabine and oxaliplatin yields promising activity in advanced colorectal cancer; therefore, the capecitabine dose we utilized is probably too high. The main toxicity is diarrhea, which is manageable with appropriate dose reductions.This combination may be preferable compared to a standard combination with infusional fluorouracil/leucovorin as it is more convenient and practical with similar efficacy. Thus, phase III trials are needed to clarify its role in the treatment of chemotherapy-na?ve advanced colorectal cancer patients.     

卡培他滨与氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙联合奥沙利铂治疗晚期胃癌的随机对照临床研究

背景与目的：目前对进展期及转移性胃癌还没有标准的化疗方案,而且缺乏有效率高、毒副反应小、安全的化疗方案.毒副反应是晚期胃癌化疗的限制性因素,影响患者的生活质量.本研究观察及比较两种常用化疗方案卡培他滨联合奥沙利铂方案（XELOX）与氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙联合奥沙利铂方案（FOLFOX4）治疗晚期胃癌的临床疗效及毒副反应,以期取得在较佳疗效保证的同时,毒副反应小,耐受性更好的效果.方法：48例晚期胃癌患者随机分成两组,XELOX组与FOLFOX4组.XELOX组25例,用卡培他滨联合奥沙利铂方案化疗,卡培他滨1000 mg/m^2,口服,2次/日,第1～14天;奥沙利铂130 mg/m^2,静脉点滴,第l天;2l d为1个周期.FOLFOX4组23例,用氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙联合奥沙利铂方案化疗,奥沙利铂85 mg/m^2,静脉点滴,第1天;亚叶酸钙200 mg/m^2,静滴2 h后予氟尿嘧啶400 mg/m^2,推注,后续600 mg/m^2持续静滴22 h,第1、2天;每2周重复,4周为1周期.两组均治疗2周期以上.按wH0标准评价客观疗效和毒副反应.结果：入组48例均可评价疗效,XELOX组有效率56.0%,中位TTP 5.8个月,MST 10个月,FOLFOX4组有效率47.8%,中位TTP 5.7个月,MST 9.8个月.两组近期有效率差异无显著性.毒副反应比较,手足综合征以：XELOX组显著（P＜0.05）,Ⅲ/Ⅳ级恶心呕吐发生率以FOLFOX4.组显著（P＜0.05）,其余毒副反应除腹泻外发生率以FOIFOX4组稍高,但差异无显著性.结论：XELOX方案与FOLFOX4方案治疗晚期胃癌疗效确切,毒副反应能耐受.两组近期疗效相似,毒副反应以XELOX组更易耐受,尤其对一般情况欠佳及老年的患者耐受性好.     

A phase II study of capecitabine plus 3-weekly oxaliplatin as first-line therapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer

Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin every 3 weeks (XELOX regimen) has proven efficacy in patients with colorectal carcinoma. We investigated this combination in patients with previously untreated advanced gastric carcinoma. The study population comprised patients with histologically confirmed nonresectable advanced gastric adenocarcinoma. Patients received intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg m(-2) over 2 h on day 1 plus oral capecitabine 1000 mg m(-2) twice daily on days 1-14, every 3 weeks. Patients received a maximum of eight cycles. Twenty evaluable patients (17 men, 3 women) with a median age of 64 years (range 38-75) were enrolled. The overall response rate was 65% (95% confidence interval (CI), 44-86%), with complete responses in two patients and partial responses in 11 patients. Median progression-free survival was 7.5 months (95% CI, 3.2-11.7 months); median overall survival was not reached during the study period. There was no grade 4 and little grade 3 toxicity. The most common haematological adverse event was anaemia (65% of patients) and the most common nonhaematological toxicities were vomiting (65%), neuropathy (60%), diarrhoea (30%), and hand-foot syndrome (20%). In conclusion, XELOX is apparently as effective as triplet combinations and is well tolerated as first-line therapy for advanced gastric carcinoma. We are starting a large multi-institutional phase II study of XELOX in this setting.