Prevalence of autoantibodies to the 65- and 67-kD isoforms of glutamate decarboxylase in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

We investigated the presence of autoantibodies to baculovirus-expressed human recombinant 65- and 67-kD isoforms of glutamate decarboxylase (GAD65 and GAD67) in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). In the immunoprecipitation test using [35S]methionine-labeled GADs antibodies to GAD65 were detected in 13/15 (87%) islet cell antibody (ICA)-positive and in 1/35 (2.9%) ICA-negative first-degree relatives of patients with IDDM, in 6/11 (54.5%) ICA-positive nondiabetic schoolchildren, and in 35/50 (70%) patients with newly diagnosed IDDM. GAD67 antibodies were positive only in five (33%) of the ICA-positive relatives (P < 0.05) and in nine (18%) IDDM patients at onset (P < 0.00001). After onset of IDDM antibodies to GAD65 and GAD67 declined but were still positive in 25 and 9.4% of subjects with long-standing IDDM (> 10 yr). In all study groups antibodies to GAD67 were only detected in GAD65 antibody-positive sera. An immunotrapping enzyme activity assay for GAD65 antibodies was positive in 64/75 (85.3%) of sera that were GAD antibody positive in the immunoprecipitation test (r = 0.870, P < 0.0001). In two (2.7%) sera GAD65 antibodies that block GAD enzyme activity were found. Our data suggest that antibodies to GAD65 but not to GAD67 represent sensitive markers for preclinical and overt IDDM. The immunotrapping assay here described represents a valuable technique for specific and sensitive screening for GAD antibodies.     

Identification of a dominant epitope of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD-65) recognized by autoantibodies in stiff-man syndrome

Glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) is the enzyme that synthesizes the neurotransmitter gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in neurons and in pancreatic beta cells. It is a major target of autoimmunity in Stiff- Man syndrome (SMS), a rare neurological disease, and in insulin- dependent diabetes mellitus. The two GAD isoforms, GAD-65 and GAD-67, are the products of two different genes. GAD-67 and GAD-65 are very similar to each other in amino acid sequence and differ substantially only at their NH2-terminal region. We have investigated the reactivity of autoantibodies of 30 Stiff-Man syndrome patients to GAD. All patient sera contained antibodies that recognize strongly GAD-65, but also GAD- 67, when tested by immunoprecipitation on brain extracts and by immunoprecipitation or immunocytochemistry on cells transfected with either the GAD-65 or the GAD-67 gene. When tested by Western blotting, all patient sera selectively recognized GAD-65. Western blot analysis of deletion mutants of GAD-65 demonstrated that autoantibodies are directed predominantly against two regions of the GAD-65 molecule. All SMS sera strongly recognized a fragment contained between amino acid 475 and the COOH terminus (amino acid 585). Within this region, amino acids 475-484 and 571-585 were required for reactivity. The requirement of these two discontinuous segments implies that the epitope is influenced by conformation. This reactivity is similar to that displayed by the monoclonal antibody GAD 6, suggesting the presence of a single immunodominant epitope (SMS-E1) in this region of GAD-65. In addition, most SMS sera recognized at least one epitope (SMS-E2) in the NH2-terminal domain of GAD-65 (amino acids 1-95). The demonstration in SMS patients of a strikingly homogeneous humoral autoimmune response against GAD and the identification of dominant autoreactive target regions may help to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of GAD processing and presentation involved in GAD autoimmunity. Moreover, the reactivity reported here of GAD autoantibodies in SMS partially differs from the reactivity of GAD autoantibodies in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, suggesting a link between the pattern of humoral autoimmunity and the clinical condition.     

Fusion proteins for combined analysis of autoantibodies to the 65-kDa isoform of glutamic acid decarboxylase and islet antigen-2 in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND: Prediction, risk assessment, and diagnosis of autoimmune diseases often rely on detection of autoantibodies directed to multiple target antigens, such as the 65-kDa isoform of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD65-abs) and the tyrosine phosphatase-like protein islet antigen-2 (IA2-abs), the two major subspecificities of islet cell antibodies (ICAs) associated with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. We hypothesized that a combination of autoantigens in a fusion protein unifying the important immunodominant epitopes could provide an efficient target for cost-effective, one-step screening of sera. METHODS: Chimeric proteins composed of GAD65 and IA2 residues were constructed, analyzed for their immune reactivity with monoclonal antibodies and sera, and used in a diagnostic assay with (35)S-labeled protein as antigen. RESULTS: Length and order of GAD65 and IA2 sequences were critical for conservation of the conformational epitopes in the fusion protein. Among four chimera tested, only IA2((606-979))/GAD65((1-585)) retained wild-type-like folding of GAD65 and IA2 domains and yielded a stable protein after baculovirus expression. Reactivity of GAD65 antibody- and IA2 antibody-positive sera from patients newly diagnosed with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, from ICA-positive prediabetics, and from ICA-positive first-degree relatives demonstrated conservation of the relevant autoreactive epitopes. The assay based on the in vitro translated fusion antigen had a sensitivity and specificity identical to those for detection of GAD65- and IA2-abs based on the two separate GAD65 and IA2 proteins. CONCLUSIONS: Autoantigens such as GAD65 and IA2 can be combined successfully in a fusion protein of similar immune reactivity. This allows simultaneous detection of GAD65- and IA2-abs in a one-step screening assay and cost-effective identification of positive individuals at risk of diabetes or at onset of disease.     

Identification and characterization of glima 38, a glycosylated islet cell membrane antigen, which together with GAD65 and IA2 marks the early phases of autoimmune response in type 1 diabetes.

Immunoprecipitating IgG autoantibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase, GAD65, and/or a tyrosine phosphatase, IA2, are present in the majority of individuals experiencing pancreatic beta cell destruction and development of type 1 diabetes. Here we identify a third islet cell autoantigen, a novel 38-kD protein, which is specifically immunoprecipitated with sera from a subset of prediabetic individuals and newly diagnosed type 1 diabetic patients. The 38-kD autoantigen, named glima 38, is an amphiphilic membrane glycoprotein, specifically expressed in islet and neuronal cell lines, and thus shares the neuroendocrine expression patterns of GAD65 and IA2. Removal of N-linked carbohydrates results in a protein of 22,000 M(r). Glima 38 autoantibodies were detected in 16/86 (19%) of newly diagnosed patients, including three very young children, who had a rapid onset of disease, and in 6/44 (14%) of prediabetic individuals up to several years before clinical onset. The cumulative incidence of GAD65 and glima 38 antibodies in these two groups was 83 and 80%, respectively, and the cumulative incidence of GAD65, glima 38, and IA2 antibodies in the same groups was 91 and 84%, respectively. GAD65, IA2, and glima 38 represent three distinct targets of immunoprecipitating IgG autoantibodies associated with beta cell destruction and type 1 diabetes.     

Evaluation of a novel radioimmunoassay using125I-labelled human recombinant GAD65 for the determination of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD65) autoantibodies

Autoantibodies to the islet cell 65-kilodalton isoform of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD65) are present in most patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus years before the clinical manifestation of the disease. GAD65 autoantibodies are also present in a subset of patients with type 2 diabetes who frequently become insulin dependent. In the present study, we evaluated a new, commercially available radioimmunoprecipitation assay for measuring GAD65 autoantibodies using 125I-labelled human recombinant GAD65. Results obtained with this assay were compared with those obtained by a reference assay based on 35S-labelled recombinant GAD65. Analyses were performed on 67 patients with type I diabetes, 350 with type 2 diabetes, and 150 apparently healthy individuals. An excellent agreement was found between the results obtained by the 125I-GAD65 assay and those obtained by the reference method. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the two assays. The sensitivity of each assay was determined from the results of the 67 type 1 patients, while the specificity was based on the 150 healthy individuals. Based on the ROC curves, the two assays appeared identical, with a sensitivity of 84% and a clinical specificity of 98%. In conclusion, based on our results, this simple, one-step centrifugation, high-capacity 125I-GAD65 assay has the same sensitivity and specificity as the reference assay and is highly suitable to detect GAD65 autoantibodies in human samples.     

青壮年糖尿病患者自身抗体联合检测的临床应用价值

目的探讨谷氨酸脱羧酶抗体(GAD-Ab)、胰岛细胞抗体(ICA)、胰岛自身抗体(IAA)和蛋白酪氨酸磷酸酶抗体(IA-2-Ab)联合检测对青壮年糖尿病患者的应用价值。方法采用免疫印迹法检测212例青壮年糖尿病患者和40例健康人血清中GAD-Ab、ICA、IAA和IA-2-Ab,并对4项自身抗体全阴患者与有1项以上阳性患者的空腹血糖、餐后2h血糖、糖化血红蛋白等血液生化指标进行比较。结果 212例青壮年糖尿病患者GAD-Ab、ICA、IAA和IA-2-Ab的阳性率分别为29.2%、21.7%、13.2%和11.3%,4项自身抗体全阴患者126例,占59.4%,与有1项以上阳性患者比较,其空腹血糖、餐后2h血糖和糖化血红蛋白水平差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论4项联合检测对青壮年糖尿病患者的诊断及治疗方案的制定有重要意义。     

Islet cell cytoplasmic autoantibody reactivity to glutamate decarboxylase in insulin-dependent diabetes.

Individuals with or at risk for insulin-dependent diabetes (IDD) frequently have autoantibodies against an islet cell cytoplasmic (ICA) antigen thought to be a sialoglycolipid. However, we now report that preabsorption of ICA-positive sera with recombinant glutamate decarboxylase (human GAD 65 and/or GAD 67) reduced or blocked the ICA reactivity of 5/18 (27%) new-onset IDD patients and 7/18 (39%) prediabetics. Interestingly, nondiabetic subjects with ICA of > or = 5 yr in duration had GAD-reactive ICA significantly more often (16/24, 67%, P < 0.04) than the diabetic groups. ICA reactivity to GAD was not related to serum ICA titer nor the age of the individual, and in all cases tested was blocked by GAD 65 or GAD 67 with equivalent efficiency. The ICA observed in 21/25 (84%) IDD patients with ICA long after clinical onset of disease (9-42 yr) was reactive to GAD. A natural history analysis of three individuals showed conversions from ICA which was reactive to GAD to a non-GAD-reactive ICA nearer to their clinical onsets of IDD. This study further defines the autoantigens reactive to ICA, and suggests that, whereas ICA that are not reactive to GAD may identify an advanced and more prognostic lesion, GAD-reactive ICA may typify the early or inductive lesion that may or may not progress to clinically significant beta cell injury.     

Detection of pancreatic islet 64,000 M(r) autoantigens in insulin-dependent diabetes distinct from glutamate decarboxylase.

Patients with insulin-dependent diabetes (IDDM) possess antibodies to islet proteins of M(r)-64,000. Potential autoantigens of this M(r) include glutamate decarboxylase (GAD) and 65 kD heat shock protein. We have detected two distinct antibody specificities in IDDM that bind 50,000 M(r) or 37,000/40,000 M(r) proteolytic fragments of 64,000 M(r) proteins. In this study, we investigated relationships of these proteolytic fragments to GAD and heat shock proteins. Polyclonal antibodies to GAD bound 50,000 M(r) fragments of islet antigen. Recombinant GAD65, but not GAD67, blocked binding to this antigen, suggesting that 50,000 M(r) fragments are derived from islet GAD65. In contrast, GAD antibodies did not recognize 37,000/40,000 M(r) fragments, and neither GAD isoforms blocked autoantibody binding to precursors of these fragments. The 37,000/40,000 M(r) fragments, but not the 50,000 M(r) fragments, were detected after trypsin treatment of immunoprecipitates from insulinoma cells that lacked expression of major GAD isoforms. Antibodies in IDDM did not bind native or trypsinized islet heat shock proteins. Thus, IDDM patients possess antibodies to GAD, but also distinct antibodies to a 64,000 M(r) protein that is not related to known GAD isoforms or heat shock proteins.     

Capillary whole blood measurement of islet autoantibodies.

OBJECTIVE: Islet cell antibody (ICA) measurements in serum are used for large-scale screening to identify subjects who are at high risk of developing type 1 diabetes. The aim of this study was to adapt measurements to capillary whole blood samples to facilitate and reduce screening costs. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: GAD65, IA-2, and combined GAD65/IA-2 antibody tests were performed on patients with type 1 diabetes, first-degree relatives of patients, and control subjects, and results from serum, plasma, whole venous blood, and capillary whole blood lysates were compared. Measurements obtained in serum and eluates from dried capillary blood spots from 36 ICA+ first-degree relatives were also compared. RESULTS: GAD65, IA-2, and combined GAD65/IA-2 antibody levels were completely concordant with measurements obtained from serum, plasma, whole venous blood, and capillary whole blood lysates. Antibody levels obtained in eluates from dried capillary blood spots were lower than corresponding serum samples, and weak antibodies were not detected. CONCLUSIONS: Initial screening for diabetes risk can be performed using one drop of capillary whole blood without further processing to separate serum. This method should be considered as a way to simplify and reduce costs of screening programs.     

Autoantibodies to a 38-kDa glycosylated islet cell membrane-associated antigen in (pre)type 1 diabetes: association with IA-2 and islet cell autoantibodies.

OBJECTIVE: To study the association of autoantibodies against a 38-kDa glycated islet cell membrane-associated (GLIMA) protein with (pre)type 1 diabetes, patient characteristics, and other immune and genetic markers of the disease and to evaluate the possible added value of GLIMA antibody determinations for disease prediction and classification. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Recent-onset type 1 diabetic patients (n = 100), prediabetic siblings (n = 23), and nondiabetic control subjects (n = 100) were consecutively recruited by the Belgian Diabetes Registry. GLIMA antibodies were determined by immunoprecipitation of radiolabeled islet cell proteins; islet cell antibodies (ICAs) were determined by indirect immunofluorescence; and insulin autoantibodies (IAAs), insulinoma-associated protein-2 antibodies (IA-2As), and GAD antibodies (GADAs) were determined by radioligand assays. RESULTS: GLIMA antibodies were detected in 38% of type 1 diabetic patients and 35% of prediabetic siblings (during follow-up) vs. 0% in control subjects (P < 0.001). Their prevalence was lower than that of other antibodies and was significantly associated with high levels of IA-2A and ICA (P < 0.0001). In (pre)diabetes, GLIMA antibodies could only be demonstrated in sera positive for > or = 1 other autoantibody. CONCLUSIONS: GLIMA antibodies are strongly associated with type 1 diabetes and antibody markers of rapid progression to clinical onset but have a lower diagnostic sensitivity for the disease than IAA, ICA, IA-2A, or GADA. In its present form, the GLIMA antibody assay does not provide much additional information for prediction or classification of diabetes, compared with that obtained from the measurement of IA-2As alone or in combination with IAAs, ICAs, and GADAs.     

Progression to diabetes in relatives with islet autoantibodies. Is it inevitable?

OBJECTIVE: A large cohort of family members with islet cell antibodies (ICA) > or = 20 Juvenile Diabetes Foundation units (JDF U) was examined to determine whether there was a subgroup at low risk of progression to diabetes; whether risk of progression changed over time; and whether rate of progression to diabetes varied according to age, islet autoantibodies, and genetic markers of susceptibility. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Individuals with ICA > or = 20 JDF U were identified from 4,423 family members recruited to prospective family studies in the U.K. Subjects were followed for up to 18 years. Antibodies to insulin, GAD, and IA-2 were measured in the first sample, and HLA class II typing was performed. RESULTS: Of 147 family members with ICA > or = 20 JDF U on at least one occasion, 29 developed type 1 diabetes after a median of 3.2 years (maximum 18.1). The cumulative risk of developing diabetes within 15 years was 47% (95% CI 28-67) for all family members with ICA > or = 20 JDF U, 2.8% (0-8.2) for those with ICA alone, and 66% (44-87) for those with at least one additional autoantibody marker. There were no differences in age, HLA class II type, or levels of ICA, insulin autoantibodies, or IA-2 antibodies between those who developed diabetes within 5 years of testing and those who developed diabetes after this time. GAD antibody levels we ..., however, higher in those who progressed more slowly. CONCLUSIONS: Family members with ICA alone are at low risk of progression to diabetes. Rapid development of disease after ICA detection could not be distinguished from delayed development on the basis of autoantibodies or markers of genetic susceptibility, and those with multiple antibodies remained at high risk throughout long-term follow-up. This suggests that all family members with multiple islet autoantibodies are destined to develop autoimmune diabetes.     

胰岛细胞自身抗体对1型糖尿病诊断价值的研究

目的 评价胰岛细胞ICA、GADA、IA-2A、IAA四种自身抗体在1型糖尿病患者中的诊断价值.方法 1型糖尿病患者51例,其中男性33例,女性18例,发病年龄20～40岁;2型糖尿病患者80例,其中男性44例,女性36例,平均年龄40～70岁;120例健康者血清,采用免疫印迹法检测血清ICA、GADA、IA-2A、IAA四种自身抗体.结果 1型糖尿病患者中,ICA、GADA、IA-2A、IAA四种自身抗体阳性率分别为:35.3%、52.9%、19.6%、15.7%,1型糖尿病患者中四种抗体阳性率均高于2型糖尿病患者和健康对照组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).四种抗体之间在1型糖尿病患者中阳性率有差异,提示不同抗体出现在1型糖尿病患者的不同阶段.结论 ICA、GADA、IA-2A、IAA的测定对1型糖尿病的诊断具有一定价值,联合检测四种自身抗体可以提高对1型糖尿病诊断的灵敏度和互补性.     

Islet cell autoantigen 69 kD (ICA69). Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel diabetes-associated autoantigen.

We have identified a novel 69-kD peptide autoantigen (ICA69) associated with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) by screening a human islet lambda gt11 cDNA expression library with cytoplasmic islet cell antibody positive sera from relatives of IDDM patients who progressed to the overt disease. The deduced open reading frame of the ICA69 cDNA predicts a 483-amino acid protein. ICA69 shows no nucleotide or amino acid sequence relation to any known sequence in GenBank, except for two short regions of similarity with BSA. The ICA69 cDNA probe hybridizes with a 2-kb mRNA in poly(A+) RNA from human pancreas, brain, heart, thyroid, and kidney, but not with skeletal muscle, placenta, spleen, or ovary. Expression of ICA69 was also detected in beta cells and cell lines, as well as in tumoral tissue of islet cell origin. The native ICA69 molecule migrates to 69 kD in SDS-PAGE as detected with specific antibodies. Serum samples from relatives of IDDM patients specifically reacted with affinity-purified recombinant ICA69 on Western blotting. The structural gene for ICA69 was designated ICA1. A homologue in the mouse, designated Ica-1 was mapped to the proximal end of chromosome 6 (within 6 cM of the Met protooncogene). ICA69 adds a novel autoantigen to the family of identified islet target molecules, and by the manner of its identification and characterization large amounts of antigen are available for development of quantitative, convenient predictive assays for autoantibodies and analysis of the role of this molecule in diabetes autoimmunity, as well as its physiologic function.     

免疫印迹法、酶联免疫法及放射免疫法对胰岛自身抗体检测的比较

目的：评价免疫印迹法检测胰岛自身抗体（GAD-A、ICA、IAA）与酶联免疫法测ICA、GADA放射免疫法测IAA结果的一致性。方法：采用免疫印迹法测定81例糖尿病患者胰岛自身抗体,将结果与酶联免疫法测定的GAD-A、ICA,放射免疫法测定IAA结果进行比较。结果：免疫印迹法阳性检出率为：GAIN-A51．8％,ICA18．5％,IAA27．1％;酶联免疫法（GAD-A、ICA）、放射免疫法（IAA）阳性检出率：GAD-A32．1％,ICA34．5％,IAA30．8％;上述两组结果进行比较,两组相比ICA和GAD-A有统计学差异（P〈0．05）,IAA无统计学差异。两组结果一致率比较：GAD-A50．6％,ICA64．2％,IAA69．1％。结论：与临床常用酶联免疫法检测GAD-A、ICA,放射免疫法检测IAA比较,免疫印迹法和酶联免疫法在ICA及GAD-A阳性检出率上的差异有显著性,和放射免疫法在IAA阳性检出率上差异无显著性。     

Distinct antibody specificities to a 64-kD islet cell antigen in type 1 diabetes as revealed by trypsin treatment

Type 1 diabetes is associated with antibodies that immunoprecipitate a 64-kD islet cell membrane protein from detergent extracts of pancreatic islets. In this study we have determined whether mild trypsin treatment of islet membranes can release fragments of the antigen that bind antibodies in the serum of Type 1 diabetic patients. Partial tryptic proteolysis of [35S]methionine-labeled 64-kD antigen immunoprecipitated from detergent extracts of rat islets resulted in the formation of 50-, 40-, and 37-kD fragments. Similar sized fragments were recovered when sera from diabetic patients were employed to immunoprecipitate polypeptides solubilized by mild trypsin treatment of a particulate fraction of radiolabeled rat islets. Of 27 diabetic patients, 22 possessed antibodies to the 50-kD polypeptide and 21 to the 40- and 37-kD polypeptides. A positive association was found between 64k antibodies and antibodies to the 50-kD fragment but not between 64k antibodies and antibodies to the 40- or 37-kD fragments. Some 64k antibody negative patients possessed antibodies that efficiently immunoprecipitated the latter fragments. Serum from 25 of 27 (93%) diabetic patients immunoprecipitated at least one of the three tryptic polypeptides. One of 20 nondiabetic controls immunoprecipitated a 50-kD polypeptide and all controls were negative for antibodies to 40- and 37-kD fragments. Thus, Type 1 diabetes is associated with the presence of at least two antibody reactivities to distinct determinants of the 64-kD antigen, and some patients may possess antibodies to a cryptic epitope on the detergent-solubilized molecule. These data suggest that the detection of antibodies (present in 93% of patients) to epitopes on tryptic polypeptides of the 64-kD antigen may be of even greater diagnostic value for the onset of Type 1 diabetes than analyses of antibodies reactive with the intact 64-kD antigen.     

Antibodies to viruses and to pancreatic islets in nondiabetic and insulin-dependent diabetic patients

Autoimmunity is frequently involved in the pathogenesis of insulin-dependent diabetes, and viral infections have been implicated in some cases. We have investigated the possibility that islet cells and viruses share antigenic determinants with the result that antiviral antibodies would cross-react with islet cells. Antibody titers to Coxsackie B2, B3, B4, and B5, Influenza A and B, and mumps viruses were compared with islet cell antibody (ICA) titers in newly diagnosed insulin-dependent diabetic patients and in some diabetic patients followed prospectively for 1 yr postdiagnosis. Nondiabetic patients, with culture-proven Coxsackie B4 infections and large rises in Coxsackie B4 antibody titers, were evaluated for islet cell antibodies. No relationship between ICA and viral antibody titers was found either in diabetic or nondiabetic patients. We conclude that it is unlikely that islet cells and the viruses tested share antigenic determinants and other mechanisms relating viral infection and autoimmunity in insulin-dependent diabetes must be sought.     

Cytotoxic T cells specific for glutamic acid decarboxylase in autoimmune diabetes

Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) is an autoimmune disease that results in the destruction of the pancreatic islet beta cells. Glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) has been recently indicated as a key autoantigen in the induction of IDDM in nonobese diabetic mice. In human diabetes, the mechanism by which the beta cells are destroyed is still unknown. Here we report the first evidence for the presence of GAD-specific cytotoxic T cells in asymptomatic and recent diabetic patients. GAD65 peptides displaying the human histocompatibility leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A*0201 binding motif have been synthesized. One of these peptides, GAD114-123, binds to HLA-A*0201 molecules in an HLA assembly assay. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from individuals with preclinical IDDM, recent-onset IDDM, and from healthy controls were stimulated in vitro with the selected peptide in the presence of autologous antigen-presenting cells. In three cases (one preclinical IDDM and two recent-onset IDDM), we detected specific killing of autologous antigen-presenting cells when incubated with GAD114-123 peptide or when infected with a recombinant vaccinia virus expressing GAD65. These patients were the only three carrying the HLA-A*0201 allele among the subjects studied. Our finding suggests that GAD- specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes may play a critical role in the initial events of IDDM.     

GADA、ICA和IAA联合检测对1型糖尿病的诊断价值

目的通过观察1型糖尿病患者血清谷氨酸脱羧酶抗体（GADA）、胰岛细胞抗体（ICA）、胰岛素自身抗体（IAA）的测定结果及其空腹C肽（FCP）和餐后2小时C肽（CP2h）的测定结果,探讨GADA、ICA和IAA联合检测对1型糖尿病的诊断价值。方法采用酶联免疫吸附法（ELISA）检测GADA、ICA和IAA;放射免疫法测定空腹C肽和餐后2小时C肽。结果1型糖尿病患者的GADA、ICA和I从分别为62．2％、41．5％和37．8％,显著高于2型糖尿病组和正常对照组（P〈0．01）,其中GADA阳性率显著高于ICA和LAA（P〈0．01）。抗体阳性患者的空腹和餐后C肽水平明显低于抗体阴性患者（P〈0．01）。青少年组患者ICA阳性率高于GADA和IAA（P〈0．01）,并且联合检测GADA／ICA和IAA三种抗体检测的阳性率明显高于单一抗体检测的阳性率。成年组及老年组患者GADA阳性率高于ICA和IAA（P〈0．01）。3种自身抗体联合检测的敏感性、特异性、阳性预报率、阴性预报率和诊断符合率分别为87．8％、85．7％、93．5％、75,O％和87．2％。结论自身抗体阳性患者可能存在明显的胰岛功能损伤;GADA、ICA和IAA联合检测可以提高诊断敏感性和诊断符合率,并且对1型糖尿病与2型糖尿病的鉴别有重要意义。青少年期患者GADA和ICA组合或GADA、ICA和ICC的联合检测有更大的意义。     

Islet-reactive T cells are a marker of preclinical insulin-dependent diabetes.

The destruction of pancreatic islet beta cells in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) is thought to be T cell mediated. To directly identify islet-reactive T cells in asymptomatic, "preclinical" IDDM individuals with islet cell antibodies (ICA), proliferation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) was measured in the presence of sonicated fetal pig proislets. Stimulation indices (mean +/- SD) for [3H]thymidine uptake by PBMC cultured with sonicated proislets were: preclinical IDDM subjects (n = 22) 6.10 +/- 6.50, recent-onset IDDM subjects (n = 29) 3.66 +/- 3.35, Graves' disease subjects (n = 6) 2.17 +/- 0.93, scleroderma subjects (n = 4) 1.65 +/- 0.19 and normal control subjects (n = 14) 1.63 +/- 0.62. 68% (15/22) of preclinical IDDM, 41% (12/29) of recent-onset IDDM and 17% (1/6) of Graves' disease subjects had T cell reactivity greater than the mean + 2 SD of controls. T cell reactivity to proislets was tissue specific, and greater in magnitude and frequency than to human insulin. The majority of preclinical subjects with ICA greater than 20 Juvenile Diabetes Foundation (JDF) units (12/15, 80%) or antibodies to a 64-kD islet autoantigen (11/15, 73%) had significant T cell reactivity to proislets. ICA greater than 40 JDF units, a strong prognostic marker for progression to clinical IDDM, was an absolute index of T cell reactivity. Overall, the frequency of T cell reactivity in preclinical subjects, 68% (15/22), was comparable to that of ICA greater than 20 JDF units or 64-kD antibodies. Greater T cell reactivity to proislets in preclinical subjects accords with the natural history of autoimmune beta cell destruction. The direct assay of islet-reactive T cells in peripheral blood may have prognostic significance for the development of clinical IDDM and should facilitate identification of the primary target autoantigen(s).     

High frequency of persisting or increasing islet-specific autoantibody levels after diagnosis of type 1 diabetes presenting before 40 years of age. The Belgian Diabetes Registry

OBJECTIVE: To study the presence and levels of GAD65 antibodies (GADA), IA-2 antibodies (IA-2-A), and islet cell antibodies (ICA) during the first years after clinical onset of type 1 diabetes in relation to age at diagnosis. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Type 1 diabetic patients (n = 194) <40 years of age were consecutively recruited at the time of diagnosis by the Belgian Diabetes Registry and followed during the first 4 years of insulin treatment. ICA were determined by indirect immunofluorescence assay and IA-2-A, GADA, and insulin autoantibodies by a radioligand assay. RESULTS: Overall, 94% of initially antibody-positive patients (n = 180) remained positive for at least 1 antibody type 4 years after diagnosis. In the case of diagnosis after 7 years of age, GADA, IA-2-A, and ICA persisted in 91, 88, and 71%, respectively, of the initially antibody-positive patients. Antibody persistence was lower in those diagnosed at <7 years of age, amounting to 60% for GADA, 71% for IA-2-A, and 39% for ICA. In 57% of the initially antibody-positive patients, at least 1 type of autoantibody reached peak values after diagnosis. This occurred more frequently for clinical onset after 7 years of age and more often for GADA (49%) than for IA-2-A (29%) or ICA (19%). Of the patients, 24% that were negative for GADA at onset became GADA-positive during the following 4 years. Among the 7% initially antibody-negative patients, 2 of 14 subjects developed antibodies after clinical onset. CONCLUSIONS: In particular, for diagnosis after 7 years of age, islet cell-specific autoantibodies generally persist for many years after diagnosis. There is also a high frequency of increasing antibody levels and of conversion to antibody positivity in the first 4 years after diagnosis and start of insulin treatment. Thus, determination of antibodies at diagnosis can underestimate the number of cases with autoimmune type 1 diabetes, in particular with assays of lower sensitivity. The divergent temporal patterns of ICA, GADA, and IA-2-A suggest that the ICA test recognizes other antibody specificities besides GADA and IA-2-A and reflects other autoimmune processes; it also indicates that GADA assays have a higher diagnostic sensitivity in the period after clinical onset.