In vitro activities of voriconazole and five licensed antifungal agents against Candida dubliniensis: comparison of CLSI M27-A2, Sensititre YeastOne, disk diffusion, and Etest methods

We compared the in vitro activity of six antifungal agents against 62 isolates of Candida dubliniensis by the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI [formerly National Committee for the Clinical Laboratory Standards]) M27-A2, Sensititre YeastOne, disk diffusion, and Etest methods and we studied the effect of the time of reading. For the azoles, voriconazole was the most potent in vitro followed by fluconazole, ketoconazole, and itraconazole. All the isolates were susceptible to amphotericin B and flucytosine. The highest rate of resistance was obtained against itraconazole with a high number of isolates defined as susceptible dose-dependent. At 24 hr, 100% of the isolates were susceptible to ketoconazole, amphotericin B, and flucytosine, 98% susceptible to voriconazole and fluconazole, and 95% for itraconazole. At 48 hr, 100% of the isolates remained susceptible for flucytosine and amphotericin B, 95% for voriconazole, 93% for fluconazole, 90% for ketoconazole, and 82% for itraconazole. The agreement between the CLSI and the other methods was better at 24 than 48 hr.     

In-vitro susceptibility testing by agar dilution method to determine the minimum inhibitory concentrations of amphotericin B, fluconazole and ketoconazole against ocular fungal isolates

Purpose: To standardize in-vitro antifungal susceptibility testing by agar dilution method to find out the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of amphotericin B, fluconazole and ketoconazole on ocular fungal isolates. Methods: A total of 180 ocular fungal isolates (130 filamentous fungi and 50 yeasts) were included. The antifungal drugs such as amphotericin B (0.0625-8 μg/mL), fluconazole (0.2-819.6 μg/mL) and ketoconazole (0.025-6.4 μg/mL) were incorporated in doubling dilutions in the yeast nitrogen base medium. The MIC was determined as the lowest concentration of the antifungal drug preventing growth of macroscopically visible colonies on drug containing plates when there was visible growth on the drug - free control plates. Results: All 50 ocular isolates of yeast were susceptible to amphotericin B, while two (4%) and five (10%) strains were resistant to fluconazole and ketoconazole respectively. Of the 130 filamentous fungi tested, six (4.6%) were resistant to amphotericin B, 49 (37.7%) and 10 (7.6%) were resistant to fluconazole and ketoconazole respectively. Percentile 50 (MIC 50) and Percentile 90 (MIC 90) for all the three antifungal agents were calculated. Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus terreus and Candida krusei were found to be resistant to fluconazole and ketoconazole. Conclusion: This technique was found to be reliable, cost effective and easy to perform with consistent results.     

In vitro activity of five antifungal agents against clinical isolates of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

We evaluated the in vitro activity of fluconazole, itraconazole, ketoconazole, 5-fluorocytosine and amphotericin B against 30 clinical isolates of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by a broth microdilution method, following the NCCLS recommendation. Testing was performed either in RPMI-1640 or yeast nitrogen base (YNB). YNB supported the growth of all isolates tested, while results in RPMI-1640 were not obtained for six isolates (20%). The MIC of all three azoles in YNB were one or two dilutions higher than those obtained in RPMI-1640 (P=0.0001 for fluconazole and itraconazole, P=0.03 for ketoconazole). Elevated MICs were observed for all three azoles, while all the isolates were susceptible to 5-fluorocytosine and amphotericin B. All MIC values were confirmed by spectrophotometric reading. Six strains of S. cerevisiae isolated from the faeces and consecutive blood cultures from an AIDS patient over a 7-month period were typed by electrophoretic karyotyping (EK). EK showed the maintenance of the same karyotype over time suggesting that the faecal isolate changed from a colonizing to infection-causing strain. The relative resistance of S. cerevisiae to azole drugs as well as its ability to cause widespread infections may promote the emergence of this species as a pathogen in immunosuppressed patients.     

Use of the sensititre colorimetric microdilution panel for antifungal susceptibility testing of dermatophytes

The Sensititre YeastOne antifungal panel was used to test 49 dermatophytes belonging to the species Epidermophyton floccosum, Microsporum gypseum, Microsporum canis, Trichophyton tonsurans, Trichophyton rubrum, and Trichophyton mentagrophytes. The MICs of four antifungals obtained with the Sensititre YeastOne antifungal panel were compared with those obtained by the reference NCCLS microdilution method. The levels of agreement between the two methods (相似文献   

Comparative evaluation of PASCO and national committee for clinical laboratory standards M27-A broth microdilution methods for antifungal drug susceptibility testing of yeasts

The PASCO antifungal susceptibility test system, developed in collaboration with a commercial company, is a broth microdilution assay which is faster and easier to use than the reference broth microdilution test performed according to the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) document M27-A guidelines. Advantages of the PASCO system include the system's inclusion of quality-controlled, premade antifungal panels containing 10, twofold serial dilutions of drugs and a one-step inoculation system whereby all wells are simultaneously inoculated in a single step. For the prototype panel, we chose eight antifungal agents for in vitro testing (amphotericin B, flucytosine, fluconazole, ketoconazole, itraconazole, clotrimazole, miconazole, and terconazole) and compared the results with those of the NCCLS method for testing 74 yeast isolates (14 Candida albicans, 10 Candida glabrata, 10 Candida tropicalis, 10 Candida krusei, 10 Candida dubliniensis, 10 Candida parapsilosis, and 10 Cryptococcus neoformans isolates). The overall agreements between the methods were 91% for fluconazole, 89% for amphotericin B and ketoconazole, 85% for itraconazole, 80% for flucytosine, 77% for terconazole, 66% for miconazole, and 53% for clotrimazole. In contrast to the M27-A reference method, the PASCO method classified as resistant seven itraconazole-susceptible isolates (9%), two fluconazole-susceptible isolates (3%), and three flucytosine-susceptible isolates (4%), representing 12 major errors. In addition, it classified two fluconazole-resistant isolates (3%) and one flucytosine-resistant isolate (1%) as susceptible, representing three very major errors. Overall, the agreement between the methods was greater than or equal to 80% for four of the seven species tested (C. dubliniensis, C. glabrata, C. krusei, and C. neoformans). The lowest agreement between methods was observed for miconazole and clotrimazole and for C. krusei isolates tested against terconazole. When the data for miconazole and clotrimazole were removed from the analysis, agreement was >/=80% for all seven species tested. Therefore, the PASCO method is a suitable alternative procedure for the testing of the antifungal susceptibilities of the medically important Candida spp. and C. neoformans against a range of antifungal agents with the exceptions only of miconazole and clotrimazole and of terconazole against C. krusei isolates.     

Therapeutic options for the management of oropharyngeal and esophageal candidiasis in HIV/AIDS patients

Mucocutaneous candidiasis is frequently one of the first signs of HIV infection. Over 90% of patients with AIDS will develop oropharyngeal candidiasis at some time during their illness. Although numerous antifungal agents are available, azoles, both topical (clotrimazole) and systemic (fluconazole, itraconazole), have replaced older topical antifungals (gentian violet and nystatin) in the management of oropharyngeal candidiasis in these patients. The systemic azoles, itraconazole and fluconazole, are generally safe and effective agents in HIV-infected patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis. A concern in these patients is clinical relapse, which appears to be dependent on degree of immunosuppression and is more common following clotrimazole and ketoconazole than following fluconazole or itraconazole. Candida esophagitis is also of concern, since it occurs in more than 10% of patients with AIDS. Fluconazole is an integral part of the management of mucosal candidiasis. A cyclodextrin oral solution formulation of itraconazole has clinical response rates similar to fluconazole and is an effective alternative. In patients with fluconazole-refractory mucosal candidiasis, treatment options include itraconazole, amphotericin B oral suspension, and parenteral amphotericin B.     

Therapeutic Options for the Management of Oropharyngeal and Esophageal Candidiasis in HIV/AIDS Patients

Abstract

Mucocutaneous candidiasis is frequently one of the first signs of HIV infection. Over 90% of patients with AIDS will develop oropharyngeal candidiasis at some time during their illness. Although numerous antifungal agents are available, azoles, both topical (clotrimazole) and systemic (fluconazole, itraconazole), have replaced older topical antifungals (gentian violet and nystatin) in the management of oropharyngeal candidiasis in these patients. The systemic azoles, itraconazole and fluconazole, are generally safe and effective agents in HIV-infected patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis. A concern in these patients is clinical relapse, which appears to be dependent on degree of immunosuppression and is more common following clotrimazole and ketoconazole than following fluconazole or itraconazole. Candida esophagitis is also of concern, since it occurs in more than 10% of patients with AIDS. Fluconazole is an integral part of the management of mucosal candidiasis. A cyclodextrin oral solution formulation of itraconazole has clinical response rates similar to fluconazole and is an effective alternative. In patients with fluconazole-refractory mucosal candidiasis, treatment options include itraconazole, amphotericin B oral suspension, and parenteral amphotericin B.     

Quality control guidelines for National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards--recommended broth macrodilution testing of ketoconazole and itraconazole.

Ketoconazole and itraconazole were tested in a multilaboratory study to establish quality control (QC) guidelines for yeast antifungal susceptibility testing. Two isolates that had been previously identified as QC isolates for amphotericin B, fluconazole, and flucytosine (Candida parapsilosis ATCC 22019 and Candida krusei ATCC 6258) were tested in accordance with the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards M27-P guidelines. Each isolate was tested 20 times with the two antifungal agents in the five laboratories by using a lot of RPMI 1640 unique to each laboratory as well as a lot common to all five laboratories, thus generating 200 MICs per drug per organism. Overall, 96 to 99% of the MICs for each drug fell within the desired 3-log2 dilution range (mode +/- 1 log2 dilution). By using these data, 3-log2 dilution QC ranges encompassing 98% of the observed MICs for three of the organism-drug combinations and 94% of the observed MICs for the fourth combination were established. These QC ranges are 0.064 to 0.25 micrograms/ml for both ketoconazole and itraconazole against C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019 and 0.125 to 0.5 micrograms/ml for both ketoconazole and itraconazole against C. krusei ATCC 6258.     

Evaluation of broth microdilution antifungal susceptibility testing conditions for Trichophyton rubrum

Fifty clinical isolates of Trichophyton rubrum were selected to test with ketoconazole, fluconazole, itraconazole, griseofulvin, and terbinafine by following the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards susceptibility testing guidelines for filamentous fungi (M38-A). In addition, other susceptibility testing conditions were evaluated: (i) three medium formulations including RPMI 1640 (standard medium), McVeigh & Morton (MVM), and Sabouraud dextrose broth (SDB); (ii) two incubation temperatures (28 and 35 degrees C); and (iii) three incubation periods (4, 7, and 10 days). The strains Candida parapsilosis (ATCC 22019), Candida krusei (ATCC 6258), T. rubrum (ATCC 40051), and Trichophyton mentagrophytes (ATCC 40004) were included as quality controls. All isolates produced clearly detectable growth only after 7 days of incubation. MICs were significantly independent of the incubation temperature (28 or 35 degrees C) (P < 0.05). Different incubation periods resulted in MICs which were consistently different for each medium when azoles and griseofulvin were tested (P < 0.05). MICs obtained from different media at the same incubation time for the same isolate were significantly different when azoles and griseofulvin were tested (P < 0.05). MICs were consistently higher (usually 1 to 2 dilutions) with RPMI than with MVM or SDB (P < 0.05). When terbinafine was tested, no parameter had any influence on MICs (P < 0.05). RPMI standard medium appears to be a suitable testing medium for determining the MICs for T. rubrum. MICs obtained at different incubation times need to be correlated with clinical outcome to demonstrate which time has better reliability.     

In-vitro resistance to azoles associated with mitochondrial DNA deficiency in Candida glabrata.

A commercially available disk diffusion procedure was used in a large-scale study to evaluate the susceptibility of a wide range of Candida isolates to polyenes and azoles. With almost all isolates of C. glabrata resistant colonies were present within the inhibition zones for the azole compounds fluconazole, ketoconazole and miconazole, and less frequently for isoconazole, econazole and clotrimazole. Ten randomly selected isolates were cloned by limiting dilution and the susceptibility of the resulting strains to polyenes and azoles was determined. All strains presented a similar susceptibility pattern with sensitivity to polyenes and the presence of resistant colonies for all azole compounds except tioconazole. For each strain and each antifungal agent, one of these resistant colonies was subcultured and studied for antifungal susceptibility. All these colonies showed similar properties regardless of which antifungal agent allowed their selection, with increased sensitivity to polyenes and cross-resistance to the azole compounds except tioconazole. Similar results were obtained on Shadomy's modified medium and on synthetic medium. Likewise, determination of MICs by the Etest method confirmed the resistance to fluconazole. Comparative growth studies revealed a respiratory deficiency in the mutants caused by mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) deletions. In addition, 'petite' mutants were obtained from a wild-type strain by exposure to ethidium bromide, and these respiratory mutants were shown to be resistant to azoles. These results demonstrate the relationship between mtDNA deficiency and resistance to azoles, and provide an interesting model to study the mechanisms of action of these antifungal agents.     

Epidemiology of fungemia in a university hospital; therapeutic incidence]

Twenty-two candidemia happened in our hospital from January 1997 to may 1998. We studied the clinical evolution of the patients and the sensitivity of the yeasts to antifungal therapy (Fungitest and E-Test method). We found 11 Candida albicans (CA), 10 Candida non albicans (CNA) (3 C. glabrata, 2 C. parapsilosis, 4 C. tropicalis, 1 C. krusei) and 1 Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The mean age of the patients was 56.4 years. There were 13 men and 9 women. We found one group of 8 (36.4%) oncohematological patients, one group of 8 (36.4%) patients with abdominal surgery, one group of 3 (13.6%) children and one group of 3 adults (13.6%) who spent more than 10 days in an intensive care unit. Ten times, these candidemia were associated with bacteriemia, 4 times with several bacteria. Three patients died because of the candidemia, 2 times with CNA and one time with CA. There wasn't any resistance to amphotericin B or ketoconazole. All the CA and 3 CNA (30%) remained sensitive to the four antifungal drugs we used (amphotericin B, ketoconazole, fluconazole, itraconazole). The 3 C. glabrata and the C. krusei were resistant or limit to fluconazole. Since the generalization of the use of fluconazole, the epidemiology is marked by the emergence of new strains of CA with high level of resistance to azols, and of CNA. In our hospital, the CA remain preponderant and only the CNA are resistant to fluconazole making difficult the choice of empiric treatment for serious fungemia.     

Interlaboratory evaluation of Etest method for testing antifungal susceptibilities of pathogenic yeasts to five antifungal agents by using Casitone agar and solidified RPMI 1640 medium with 2% glucose.

An interlaboratory evaluation (two centers) of the Etest method was conducted for testing the antifungal susceptibilities of yeasts. The MICs of amphotericin B, fluconazole, flucytosine, itraconazole, and ketoconazole were determined for 83 isolates of Candida spp., Cryptococcus neoformans, and Torulopsis glabrata. Two buffered (phosphate buffer) culture media were evaluated: solidified RPMI 1640 medium with 2% glucose and Casitone agar. MIC endpoints were determined after both 24 and 48 h of incubation at 35 degrees C. Analysis of 3,420 MICs demonstrated higher interlaboratory agreement (percentage of MIC pairs within a 2-dilution range) with Casitone medium than with RPMI 1640 medium when testing amphotericin B (84 to 90% versus 1 to 4%), itraconazole (87% versus 63 to 74%), and ketoconazole (94 to 96% versus 88 to 90%). In contrast, better interlaboratory reproducibility was determined between fluconazole MIC pairs when RPMI 1640 medium rather than Casitone medium was used (96 to 98% versus 77 to 90%). Comparison of the flucytosine MICs obtained with RPMI 1640 medium revealed greater than 80% reproducibility. The study suggests the potential value of the Etest as a convenient alternative method for testing the susceptibilities of yeasts. It also indicates the need for further optimization of medium formulations and MIC endpoint criteria to improve interlaboratory agreement.     

Susceptibility profile of 200 bloodstream isolates of Candida spp. collected from Brazilian tertiary care hospitals.

We evaluated the antifungal susceptibility profile of 200 recent bloodstream isolates of Candida spp. sequentially obtained from patients admitted to five tertiary care hospitals in Brazil. Isolates were identified by classical methods and the antifungal susceptibility profile was determined by the NCCLS microbroth assay method. Candida albicans was the most frequent species (41.5%); followed by C. tropicalis (24%) and C. parapsilosis (20.5%). The frequency of C. glabrata and C. krusei was low (nine and two isolates, respectively). Only three strains were resistant to fluconazole (two C. krusei and one C. glabrata) and only one was resistant to itraconazole (the same C. glabrata strain that was resistant to fluconazole). Two strains were considered susceptible dose-dependent (SDD) to fluconazole and 13 isolates (6.5%) were SDD to itraconazole. Overall, the MIC50 value of non-C. albicans isolates for fluconazole was two dilutions higher than that of C. albicans isolates, and for itraconazole was one dilution higher. Resistance to amphotericin B (MIC > or = 2 microg ml(-1)) was observed in 2.5% of isolates (two strains of C. albicans, two of C. parapsilosis and one of C. krusei). This study showed that episodes of candidemia in Brazilian public hospitals are represented mainly by fluconazole-susceptible non-C. albicans species. This finding is probably related to the low use of fluconazole in these hospitals.     

In vitro antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida blood isolates and evaluation of the E-test method.

Fungal infections have dramatically increased in recent years, along with the increase of drug-resistant isolates in immunocompromised patients. Ninety eight Candida species obtained from blood cultures at the Tri-Service General Hospital, Taiwan, from 1998 to 2000 were studied. These included 50 Candida albicans, 13 Candida glabrata, 24 Candida tropicalis and 11 Candida parapsilosis isolates. To investigate their susceptibility to commonly used antifungal drugs, minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of amphotericin B, fluconazole, flucytosine, and ketoconazole were determined. Both the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards reference broth macrodilution method and E-test were used in parallel. Ninety five isolates (95/98, 96.94%) were susceptible to amphotericin B at a concentration < or = 1 microg/mL. All isolates (100%, 98/98) were susceptible to flucytosine. Approximately 30% of these Candida isolates were resistant to fluconazole. The MIC for 90% of isolates (MIC90) values for both methods for these isolates were 0.5 microg/mL for amphotericin B, 32 microg/mL for fluconazole, 0.25 microg/mL for flucytosine (0.125 microg/mL by E-test method), and 4 microg/mL for ketoconazole. MIC for 50% of isolates (MIC50) values for these agents were 0.25, 2, 0.06, and 0.06 microg/mL, respectively. The essential agreement of MIC values within 2 dilutions for the 2 methods was 99.0% for amphotericin B, 90.8% for ketoconazole, 92.9% for fluconazole, and 91.8% for flucytosine. This study showed that E-test has equivalent performance to the broth macrodilution method and can be used as an alternative MIC technique for antifungal susceptibility testing.     

High oral prevalence of Candida krusei in leprosy patients in northern Thailand

Although Candida albicans is the most common human yeast pathogen, other Candida species such as C. krusei are now recognized as emerging agents, especially in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease. C. krusei is inherently resistant to the widely used triazole antifungal fluconazole and poses therapeutic problems, especially in systemic candidiasis. In a surveillance study of leprosy patients (with arrested or burnt-out disease) in a leprosarium in northern Thailand, we found a rate of oral carriage of C. krusei (36%) significantly (P < 0.05) higher than that for a healthy control group (10%). Among the Candida-positive patients, 16 of 35 (46%) carried C. krusei, while C. albicans was the second most common isolate (12 of 35 patients; 34%). The corresponding figures for the control group were 2 of 13 (15%) and 6 of 13 (46%), respectively. Studies of the antifungal resistance of the C. krusei isolates from patients indicated that all except one of the isolates were resistant to fluconazole, two isolates were resistant to ketoconazole, and all isolates were sensitive to amphotericin B. Evaluation of their genetic profiles by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis with three different primers and subsequent analysis of the gel profiles by computerized cluster-derived dendrograms revealed that the C. krusei isolates from patients belonged to 10 disparate clusters, despite the origin from a single locale. These nascent findings indicate an alarmingly high prevalence of a Candida species resistant to a widely used antifungal in a part of the world where HIV disease is endemic.     

Antifungal susceptibility testing of yeast isolates from blood cultures by microbroth dilution and the E test

The results of microbroth dilution were compared with those of the E test for 169 yeast isolates tested for their susceptibility to antifungal agents. All isolates were tested by both methods against amphotericin B, ketoconazole, fluconazole, and itraconazole. The E test results generally correlated well with those obtained by the reference method. There was at least 80% agreement of minimum inhibitory concentration results within two dilutions for all yeast species and agents tested, except forCryptococcus neoformans tested with fluconazole (8% agreement). The E test appears to be a suitable alternative antifungal susceptibility test method for yeasts, although improvements are required for testingCryptococcus neoformans against fluconazole.     

Strain variation among and antifungal susceptibilities of isolates of Candida krusei.

Candida krusei is an emerging pathogen that is well known for its propensity to develop resistance to fluconazole and other azoles. Despite the potential clinical significance of C. krusei, little is known of its epidemiology and genetic diversity as defined by the newer DNA-based typing methods. We investigated the genotypic diversity and antifungal susceptibility of 67 clinical isolates from 44 patients and 5 health care workers from six different medical centers. Strain delineation was performed by restriction endonuclease analysis of genomic DNA (REAG) with the restriction enzyme HinfI followed by conventional electrophoresis. The susceptibility of the isolates to the antifungal agents amphotericin B, flucytosine, fluconazole, and itraconazole was determined by methods recommended by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. The MICs at which 90% of the isolates were inhibited ranged from 1.0 microgram/ml for itraconazole to 64 micrograms/ml for fluconazole. In general, isolates from a given patient, or epidemiologically related isolates from a single institution, were identical by molecular typing methods. Epidemiologically unrelated isolates were distinctly different by the REAG typing method employed. These data document the genetic diversity and antifungal susceptibility of clinical isolates of C. krusei.     

Antifungal susceptibility testing of dermatophytes: establishing a medium for inducing conidial growth and evaluation of susceptibility of clinical isolates

A standardized reference method for dermatophyte in vitro susceptibility testing is lacking. In a previous study, Norris et al. (H. A. Norris, B. E. Elewski, and M. A. Ghannoum, J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 40(6, part 2):S9-S13) established the optimal medium and other growth variables. However, the earlier study did not address two issues: (i) selection of an optimal medium for conidial formation by dermatophytes and (ii) validation of the method with a large number of dermatophytes. The present study addresses these two points. To select which agar medium best supported conidial growth, representative isolates of dermatophytes were grown on different agars. Preliminary experiments showed that only oatmeal cereal agar supported the production of conidia by Trichophyton rubrum. We tested the abilities of 251 T. rubrum isolates to form conidia using three different cereal agars and potato dextrose agar. Overall, oatmeal cereal and rice agar media were comparable in their abilities to support T. rubrum conidial growth. Next, we used the oatmeal cereal agar for conidial formation along with the optimal conditions for dermatophyte susceptibility testing proposed by Norris et al. and determined the antifungal susceptibilities of 217 dermatophytes to fluconazole, griseofulvin, itraconazole, and terbinafine. Relative to the other agents tested, terbinafine possessed the highest antifungal activity against all of the dermatophytes. The mean +/- standard error of the mean MICs of fluconazole, itraconazole, terbinafine, and griseofulvin were 2.07 +/- 0.29, 0.13 +/- 0.01, 0.002 +/- 0.0003, and 0.71 +/- 0.05 microgram/ml, respectively. This study is the first step in the identification of optimal conditions that could be used for the standardization of the antifungal susceptibility testing method for dermatophytes. Inter- and intralaboratory agreement as well as clinical correlations need to be established.     

In vitro activities of posaconazole, ravuconazole, terbinafine, itraconazole and fluconazole against dermatophyte, yeast and non-dermatophyte species.

The in vitro activities of two new triazole antifungal agents with broad-spectrum antifungal activity, posaconazole and ravuconazole, were compared with those of three well-established antifungal agents, terbinafine, itraconazole and fluconazole, against 184 clinical isolates. These included 129 dermatophyte isolates (twelve species), 25 yeast isolates (five species) and 28 non-dermatophyte isolates (nine species). In vitro testing was conducted using microdilution plates with RPMI 1640 and National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) guidelines (M27-38P) were followed, except for the preparation of the dermatophyte inoculum. Both posaconazole and ravuconazole showed similar broad-spectrum activity against dermatophyte, yeast and non-dermatophyte species. Mean inhibitory concentrations (MIC) at which 90% [MIC90] of the isolates were inhibited by posaconazole and ravuconazole were 0.25 and 0.5 microg/ml for dermatophytes, 0.5 and 0.25 microg/ml for yeasts, and >4 and 8 microg/ml for non-dermatophytes. The MIC ranges against Trichophyton (six species), Microsporum (five species) and Epidermophyton flocossum were: posaconazole (0.007-1.0/0.007-0.25/0.007-1.0 microg/ml), ravuconazole (0.015-8.0/0.015-1.0/0.015-1.0 microg/ml), itraconazole (0.015- >8.0/0.015-0.5/ 0.015-8.0 microg/ml), fluconazole (0.125- >64.0/4.0 >64.0/0.5-64.0 microg/ml) and terbinafine (0.003 >2.0/0.007-2.0/0.007 >2.0 microg/ml). Overall ranking of the antifungal activity of the five antifungal agents was: terbinafine > posaconazole > ravuconazole > itraconazole > fluconazole, for dermatophytes; ravuconazole > posaconazole > itraconazole > fluconazole > terbinafine, against yeasts; and posaconazole > ravuconazole > terbinafine > itraconazole > fluconazole, for non-dermatophytes.     

In vitro susceptibilities and biotypes of Candida albicans isolates from the oral cavities of patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus.

Candida albicans strains were isolated from the oral cavities of 62 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients at different stages of HIV infection. Only patients with persistent generalized lymphadenopathy-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-related complex or full-blown AIDS showed typical clinical symptoms for oral candidiasis. In general, the microbiological recovery of Candida strains from the oral cavity increased with more advanced stages of HIV infection. The antifungal activity of ketoconazole, itraconazole, nystatin, amphotericin B, and flucytosine against all 62 strains was evaluated by means of a photometer-read broth microdilution method for determination of the 30% inhibitory concentrations of the drugs. The 95% ranges of 30% inhibitory concentrations were as follows: less than or equal to 0.063 to 32 micrograms/ml for ketoconazole, less than or equal to 0.063 to 8 micrograms/ml for itraconazole, 0.5 to 4 micrograms/ml for nystatin, less than or equal to 0.063 to 4 micrograms/ml for amphotericin B, and less than or equal to 0.063 to 8 micrograms/ml for flucytosine. Two strains were resistant to flucytosine, one was resistant to ketoconazole, and three were resistant to itraconazole. Isolates from patients with full-blown AIDS showed significantly less susceptibility to itraconazole, amphotericin B, and flucytosine. Strains were biotyped by using the API 20C carbohydrate assimilation system. The major biotype accounted for 63.9% of the isolates. At repeated evaluation, a change in biotype pattern was seen in 27.3%.