CNS relapse despite prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in small cell lung cancer (SCLC)

CNS relapse after PCI may reflect either suboptimal radiation dose schedules or reseeding from other sites of active disease. A retrospective study has been undertaken to investigate these alternative mechanisms of treatment failure. Between August 1981 and December 1983, 30 patients with SCLC treated by induction chemotherapy, followed by high-dose cyclophosphamide (7 Gm/m2), were selected for PCI on the basis of clinical, radiological, and bronchoscopic CR. Pretreatment CT brain scans were normal in all patients, and 20 Gy mid-plane dose in 5 daily fractions were delivered by lateral fields to whole brain using megavoltage X rays and localizing check films. Progressive focal neurological signs of cranial metastases developed in 7/30 (23%) patients 3-11 months after PCI, confirmed on CT scanning in 4 patients. Relapse at other sites, predominantly the thorax, occurred in all seven patients at intervals of 1-6 months prior to CNS relapse. Published clinical data of tumor volume doubling times in SCLC predict longer CNS relapse-free intervals after PCI than those observed in our patients if reseeding was responsible for relapse. This suggests that incomplete eradication of intracranial disease is the main cause of CNS relapse after PCI. Higher equivalent radiation doses may improve the results of PCI.     

Alternating chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide/adriamycin/vincristine (CAV) and cisplatin/etoposide (PVP) against small cell lung cancer. Eastern Shikoku Lung Cancer Chemotherapy Group.

Seventy-four confirmed small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients received alternating combination chemotherapy with CAV and PVP. The CAV comprised of cyclophosphamide 800 mg/m2 on day 1, adriamycin 50 mg/m2 on day 1 and vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 on day 1, administered every 3-4 weeks. The PVP comprised cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 and etoposide 75 mg/m2 on day 1-5 administered every 3-4 weeks. Of these 74 patients, 63 (85.1%) achieved complete or partial responses with 16 (21.6%) obtaining a complete response. The median survival time was 13.2 months: 10.4 months in patients with extensive disease (ED), 16.3 months in those with limited disease (LD). A three-year disease-free period was achieved in eight patients (11.2%: 4.8% with ED, 16.8% with LD). The median duration of response was 28.3 weeks: 20.1 weeks with ED and 44.0 weeks with LD. The most commonly encountered side effects were nausea, vomiting, alopecia and myelosuppression but all were tolerable. We consider CAV-PVP to be an effective combination regimen for treating SCLC.     

Long-term results of induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemotherapy and thoracic irradiation in limited small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a chemoresponsive tumor but overall survival remains poor even in limited disease (LD). With the aim of eradicating chemoresistant tumor cells and reducing toxicity, we investigated in this phase II trial the feasibility and outcome of a sequential approach of induction chemotherapy (CT) followed, in responding patients with LD-SCLC, by intensified platinum-based CT and concurrent thoracic irradiation (TI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We treated 55 consecutive LD-SCLC patients with three 21-day cycles of cyclophosphamide, epiadriamycin and vincristine (CEV) as induction CT. In 44 (80%) patients there was an objective response and they received treatment intensification consisting of TI and concomitant CT with carboplatin and etoposide plus recombinant granulocite colony stimulating factor. Twenty-five (57%) patients were submitted to twice-daily thoracic irradiation (TDTI; 1.5 Gy per fraction, to a total dose of 45 Gy) and 19 (43%) to once-daily thoracic irradiation (ODTI; 2 Gy per fraction, to a total dose of 50 Gy). RESULTS: Median follow up was 75 months (range, 42-102). Of 44 patients submitted to intensification with TI plus CT, 32 (73%) had a complete and 12 (27%) a partial response. Median overall survival of all 55 patients was 17 months with actuarial survival probabilities of 2 and 5 years, 32 and 25%, respectively. Analysis of patient sub-groups showed a 5-month median survival in non-responders, 19 in TDTI and 17 in ODTI patients, respectively. Two and 5 year survival probabilities were 0% in non-responders, 40 and 35% in TDTI and 39 and 21% in ODTI patients, respectively. At present, 13 of 44 responders are still alive, of which nine (20%) have been progression-free from 45 to 93 months (median 60). Treatment failure was registered in 31 (70%) of 44 patients who received both induction and intensification treatment. One-half of patients had intrathoracic recurrence, eight of which only local and the remaining seven local and distant. Fourteen (32%) patients had brain metastases. Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 24 (55%) patients with no differences between treatment groups. Grade 3 esophagitis was registered in four (9%) patients: in 3/25 (12%) and 1/19 (5%) of those who received TDTI and ODTI, respectively (P=not significant). Acute radiation pneumonitis occurred in three (12%) patients submitted to TDTI. No clinically debilitating pulmonary fibrosis, permanent esophageal stricture or toxic death was observed. CONCLUSIONS: In LD-SCLC patients late concurrent CT plus TI is feasible and effective. Our long-term results are similar to the best reported in the literature. Despite the high incidence of complete response obtained, however, one-half of the patients had intrathoracic relapse and one-third brain metastases.     

Weekly chemotherapy with cisplatin,vincristine, doxorubicin,and etoposide followed by surgery for thymic carcinoma

Objective

We present our experience treating the patients with thymic carcinoma using induction chemotherapy according to weekly chemotherapy with cisplatin, vincristine, doxorubicin, and etoposide (CODE) followed by surgery.

Patients and methods

From January 2001 to December 2010, 17 patients were diagnosed as having thymic carcinoma at our hospital. We performed CODE chemotherapy for induction treatment followed by surgical resection in 7 of these patients.

Results

Seven patients consisted of 6 men and 1 woman, with an average age of 47.3 years (range 25–67 years). Five patients were clinically staged as Masaoka Stage III, and 2 were Stage IVa. A partial response was identified in 5 patients, and stable disease was observed in 2 patients. No cases of progressive disease were seen. Surgical resection was performed in all the patients: 6 underwent an R0 resection and 1 underwent an R1 resection. The estimated overall survival rates at 5 and 10 years were both 80%, and the relapse-free survival rates at 5 and 10 years were 68.6% and 53.6% respectively.

Conclusions

Induction chemotherapy using the CODE regimen, followed by a complete surgical resection can be performed with a promising survival outcome for patients with thymic carcinoma with borderline resectable lesions.     

Effect of alternating combination chemotherapy consisting of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, cisplatin, and etoposide for small cell lung cancer on hematopoietic progenitors in the peripheral blood.

The effects of a combination chemotherapy (CAV-PVP) consisting of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, hydrochloride (dox) and vincristine (CAV) alternating with cisplatin and etoposide (PVP) on peripheral blood hematopoietic progenitor cells (PBHPs) were studied in five patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). The kinetics of the CFU-GM levels were different during the CAV and PVP phases. None of the five patients displayed a rebound increase in the level of peripheral blood CFU-GM during the CAV phase. In contrast, all five patients displayed a rebound increase in peripheral blood CFU-GM levels during the PVP phase of the alternative combination chemotherapy (3-5 weeks after the initiation of PVP regimen). These findings indicate the optimal timing for leukapheresis to obtain PBHPs in SCLC patients which have been treated with an alternating combination chemotherapy consisting of CAV-PVP.     

Therapy for small cell lung cancer using carboplatin, ifosfamide, etoposide (without dose reduction), mid-cycle vincristine with thoracic and cranial irradiation

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of intensive chemotherapy, administered without dose reduction, with cranial and thoracic radiotherapy given when possible as a single fraction in small cell lung cancer. 87 patients were eligible on the basis of good performance status, normal or near normal biochemistry and clinical staging, 73 limited and 14 extensive stage, computed tomography scanning was not mandatory. Six cycles of carboplatin, ifosfamide and etoposide with vincristine on day 15 at 4 weekly intervals were planned. Dosages were not reduced in response to myelosuppression. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) as a single fraction after the first cycle and thoracic irradiation (when possible as a single fraction) following the third cycle were delivered. Seventy-two per cent of patients completed the protocol. Complete response rate was 55% and 26% of patients had a partial response. The median nadirs of neutropenia were 0.5 × 10⁹/l and thrombocytopenia 14 × 10⁹/l, with 6% probable treatment-related deaths. Performance status and dyspnoea improved markedly to normal or near normal levels following the second course. Brain metastases occurred in 13% of patients. The median survival was 16.2 months with a 2-year survival of 31% (95% confidence interval, 24–41%) for a minimum follow-up of 26 months. These results compare favourably with other combined modality studies, using multiple radiotherapy fractions with cisplatin-based combinations and dosage reduction for patients staged in more anatomical detail. The toxicity spectrum and efficacy data could lead to the use of this chemotherapy regimen with haematopoietic growth factors and, in the future, peripheral blood progenitor cell rescue.     

Cisplatin plus etoposide chemotherapy followed by thoracic irradiation and paclitaxel plus cisplatin consolidation therapy for patients with limited stage small cell lung carcinoma

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of a cisplatin plus etoposide regimen followed by thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) and paclitaxel plus cisplatin consolidation chemotherapy in patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with limited SCLC were enrolled onto this study. Patients received three courses of cisplatin 75 mg/m2 i.v., day 1 and etoposide 100 mg/m2 i.v., days 1-3 (EP regimen), followed by TRT (45-56 Gy administered in 15 fractions), and three courses of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 i.v., day 1 and cisplatin, as previously, on day 2 (PP regimen); cycles were repeated every 21 days. RESULTS: All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 34 for response. The overall response rate was 67% (CR: 26%; PR: 41%; intention-to-treat analysis) (95% CI: 53.0-84.2%). After a median follow-up period of 15 months, the median survival time was 15 months, the median time to tumor progression 8.3 months and the 1-year survival rate 53.8%. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 39% and 36% of patients receiving EP and PP regimens, respectively. The incidence of febrile neutropenia was 5% and 3% for EP and PP regimens, respectively. Other hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities were mild, with the exception of esophagitis occurring in 36% of patients during and/or immediately after radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: Consolidation therapy with PP after sequential EP and thoracic radiotherapy is feasible and well-tolerated; however, the efficacy results are comparable with those previously obtained in the same patients' population using a combination of EP and TRT.     

非小细胞肺癌预防性脑放射治疗

肺癌是临床的常见肿瘤之一,其中非小细胞肺癌占80%左右.随着治疗手段的提高,患者生存期明显延长,脑转移发病率也随之增加.如何预防非小细胞肺癌患者尤其是肺腺癌患者发生脑转移,延长患者生存时间、提高患者生存质量是肿瘤科医师需要思考的重要问题.     

Short course prophylactic cranial irradiation for small cell lung cancer

Ninety-one patients with small cell carcinoma of the lung were given a shortened, intensive course of prophylactic cranial irradiation consisting of 2,000 rad in five fractions. The CNS relapse rate was 21%, but in only one of 91 patients was the brain the first and only site of relapse. Acute toxicities consisting of headache (16%) and nausea and vomiting (15%) were observed. Results are compared with previous results from other studies of cranial irradiation.     

Adriamycin, cisplatin, and etoposide combination chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer

Twenty-three patients with small cell lung cancer (11 with limited disease and 12 with extensive disease) who had not received previous chemotherapy were treated with a combination of adriamycin (30 mg/m2, i.v., on day 1), cisplatin (80 mg/m2, i.v., on day 1) and etoposide (70 mg/m2, i.v., on day 1-5). This chemotherapy regimen was repeated at 3- or 4-week intervals for 3 to 5 treatment cycles. Among 22 evaluable patients, 5 showed complete response and 17 had a partial response (response rate 100%). The median response duration of 12 extensive disease patients was 21 months. There were 5 survivors for more than 2 years. Toxicity included moderate to severe hematologic toxicity, alopecia, nausea and vomiting. This combination chemotherapy appears to be optimal for the treatment of small cell lung cancer.     

A combination chemotherapy consisting of vincristine, etoposide and cyclophosphamide (VEC) for small cell carcinoma of the lung

Twenty-nine patients with small cell carcinoma of the lung were treated with a combination therapy consisting of vincristine 1 mg/m2 i.v. day 1, etoposide 200 mg/body p.o day 1-5 and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 i.v. day 1 (VEC) in 3 week interval. After 2 courses of VEC, four out of 10 patients with limited disease (LD) showed a complete response (CR), while 7 out of 19 patients with extensive disease (ED) obtained a CR. Six patients with LD and 6 patients with ED received subsequent radiotherapy to primary tumors and to regional lymph nodes, and 5 with LD and 3 with ED attained a CR. Overall complete response was observed in 9 patients (90%) in LD and 10 patients (53%) in ED. The median duration of survival was 17 months in complete responders with LD and that was 12 months in those with ED. Dose limiting toxicity of the VEC regimen was leukopenia which occurred in most patients and thrombocytopenia was less frequent. Non-hematologic toxicities containing alopecia, numbness, nausea and others were acceptable and well tolerated.     

Treatment of limited small-cell lung cancer with etoposide and cisplatin alternating with vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide versus concurrent etoposide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide and chest radiotherapy: a Southwest Oncology Group Study

The Goldie-Coldman model explaining the kinetics of tumor cell kill and drug resistance has a potential application in designing chemotherapy regimes. In this Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) trial we tested the alternation of two potentially noncrossresistant drug combinations with a concurrent drug combination in patients with limited small-cell lung cancer. The concurrent drug combination consisted of etoposide (VP-16), 75 mg/m2/intravenously (IV), days 1, 2, and 3; vincristine, 1.0 mg/m2/IV, days 1 and 8; Adriamycin (doxorubicin; Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH), 40 mg/m2/IV, day 1; and cyclophosphamide, 750 mg/m2/IV, day 1 (EVAC). The alternating combination consisted of VP-16, 100 mg/m2/IV, days 1, 2, and 3; and cisplatin (CDDP), 100 mg/m2/IV, day 1, alternating with vincristine, 1.0 mg/m2/IV, days 1 and 8; Adriamycin, 50 mg/m2/IV, day 1; and cyclophosphamide, 750 mg/m2/IV, day 1 (VP-16/CDDP-VAC). Chemotherapy was administered at 3-week intervals for six cycles both before and after chest (5,000 rads/5 weeks) and whole brain radiotherapy (3,000 rads/2 weeks). One hundred ninety-nine patients received EVAC and 201 received the alternating combination. There was no significant difference in the response rate to the initial six cycles of treatment with EVAC (CR, 40%) versus the alternating combination (CR, 38%). There was no significant difference between the best response, EVAC (CR, 48%) and VP-16/CDDP-VAC (CR, 51%). Median survival for all randomized patients on EVAC is 15.1 months versus 16.5 months on the alternating combination (P = .58). Toxicities consisted primarily of bone marrow suppression, anorexia, nausea and vomiting, peripheral neuropathies, and alopecia. As in previous trials, the chest was the most common site of relapse (33%). There were no differences in the incidence and sites of relapse between the two treatment arms. These treatments appear equally effective at inducing remission and prolonging survival in patients with small-cell lung cancer.     

Adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine and methotrexate combination chemotherapy of small cell lung cancer

Twenty-two patients who had not received previous chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer were treated with a combination of adriamycin (30 mg/m2, i.v., on day 1), cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2, i.v., on day 1, and 350 mg/m2, i.v., on day 8), vincristine (1 mg/m2, i.v., on day 1) and methotrexate (20 mg/m2, i.v., on days 1 and 8). This chemotherapy regimen was repeated at 3- or 4-week intervals. Among 20 evaluable patients, none showed complete response but 14 (70%) showed a partial response, with a median response duration of 8 weeks (range, 4-20 weeks). The median survival time for the 20 evaluable patients was 28 weeks. Toxicity included mild to moderate hematologic toxicity, alopecia and nausea and vomiting. This combination chemotherapy appears to be suboptimal for the treatment of small cell lung cancer, with no complete responses and a relatively short median survival time.     

Vincristine, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide with and without etoposide in limited small cell lung cancer

A total of 80 patients with limited disease of small cell lung cancer were randomized to receive either vincristine 1 mg/m2 (max. 2 mg), doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 (VAC) i.v. on day 1, or the same drugs and etoposide 80 mg/m2 i.v. daily for 3 days (VACE) every 3 weeks for nine courses. Chest irradiation was given in both regimens after the second course. The response rate was 84% for VAC (41% complete responses) and 75% for VACE (46% complete responses). The median survival time was 10 months with VAC regimen, and 14 months with VACE (difference statistically not significant). The median duration of remission was 8 months with VAC and 14 months with VACE (p = 0.03), and the median survival for complete or partial responders was 12 months and 20 months respectively (p = 0.006). Myelosuppression was significantly greater in the VACE group, and there was one treatment related death in the group receiving VACE. In this study the addition of etoposide to VAC improved the duration of response, but did not lead to longer survival of patients with limited disease of small cell lung cancer.     

Phase II study of irinotecan plus cisplatin induction followed by concurrent twice-daily thoracic irradiation with etoposide plus cisplatin chemotherapy for limited-disease small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Irinotecan plus cisplatin (IP) chemotherapy demonstrated a promising outcome with a high complete response (CR) rate in chemotherapy-na?ve patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). We evaluated the efficacy of induction IP chemotherapy followed by concurrent etoposide plus cisplatin (EP) chemotherapy with twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy (TDTRT) in limited-disease SCLC (LD-SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between November 2001 and May 2003, 35 chemotherapy-na?ve patients with LD-SCLC were enrolled. Thirty-three patients (94%) were male, and 29 (83%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. The median age was 63 years. Treatment consisted of two 21-day cycles of cisplatin 40 mg/m2 and irinotecan 80 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) on days 1 and 8 followed by two 21-day cycles of cisplatin 60 mg/m2 i.v. on days 43 and 64, and etoposide 100 mg/m2 i.v. on days 43 to 45 and 64 to 66, with concurrent TDTRT of total 45 Gy beginning on day 43. RESULTS: All 35 patients were assessable for response. The objective response rate was 97% (CR, 3; partial response [PR], 31) after induction chemotherapy and 100% (CR, 15; PR, 20) after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). After a median follow-up of 26.5 months, the median survival was 25.0 months (95% CI, 19.0 to 30.9) with 1- and 2-year overall survival rates of 85.7% and 53.9%, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.9 months with a 1- and 2-year PFS of 58.5% and 36.1%, respectively. The most common toxicities were grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in 68% of patients during induction chemotherapy and 100% during CCRT. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 20% of patients during induction chemotherapy and 60% during CCRT. CONCLUSION: IP induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent TDTRT with EP chemotherapy showed a promising activity with favorable 1- and 2-year survival rates. Based on the favorable outcome in this trial, this regimen should be evaluated in a large phase III trial.     

Leukoencephalopathy in small cell lung cancer patients receiving prophylactic cranial irradiation

The cases of 283 small cell lung cancer patients who received treatment with combination chemotherapy with or without prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) were reviewed to determine the incidence of leukoencephalopathy. The overall incidence was 10%. Of all patients receiving PCI, 17% developed neurotoxicity, and of those receiving PCI and surviving greater than or equal to 1.5 years, 37% suffered neurologic sequelae. In those receiving PCI but surviving less than 1.5 years, the incidence of neurotoxicity was 4%. The mean time interval between the end of PCI and the onset of neurotoxicity was 17 months (range 2-63 months). The PCI dose ranged from 2600-3600 cGy. None of the patients not receiving PCI developed neurotoxicity. The incidence of neurotoxicity in long-term survivors (greater than or equal to 1.5 years) with respect to PCI dose was less than or equal to 3000 cGy (25%), 3200 cGy (56%), 3600 cGy (36%). Almost all of the patients getting PCI also received lomustine, an agent associated with DNA repair inhibition and synergism with DNA damaging agents such as ionizing radiation or alkylating agents. Under the conditions of our study, PCI was associated with an unacceptable risk of neurotoxicity. Until further information is forthcoming, one should proceed with caution when using PCI in conjunction with lomustine.     

Randomized trial of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine versus cisplatin and etoposide versus alternation of these regimens in small-cell lung cancer.

Between April 1985 and May 1988, we conducted a randomized study comparing two standard chemotherapy regimens with the same regimens given on an alternating basis in patients with small-cell lung cancer. The patients were randomly assigned to receive cyclophosphamide at a dose of 800 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on day 1, doxorubicin at 50 mg/m2 IV on day 1, and vincristine at 1.4 mg/m2 IV on day 1 (CAV); cisplatin at 80 mg/m2 IV on day 1 and etoposide at 100 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 3, and 5 (PE); or CAV alternating with PE (CAV/PE). Each regimen was repeated every 3-4 weeks. Three hundred patients were entered in the study, and 288 of them were eligible for analysis (97 for CAV, 97 for PE, and 94 for CAV/PE). The response rates for PE (78%) and CAV/PE (76%) were significantly higher than the rate for CAV (55%), while the complete response rates were similar (14%, 16%, and 15%, respectively). Nine (23%) of 39 patients who failed to respond to the initial CAV regimen responded to PE when they were crossed over. In contrast, only one (8%) of 13 patients responded to CAV after failing to respond to the PE regimen, suggesting that these two regimens were partially non-cross-resistant. The response duration on CAV/PE was significantly longer than that with CAV (P = .004). The survival time with CAV/PE (11.8 months) was superior to that with CAV (9.9 months) (P = .027) or that with PE (9.9 months) (P = .056). In patients with limited disease, the survival in the alternating arm was significantly superior to the survival in the CAV arm (P = .014) or the survival in the PE arm (P = .023). The toxic effects were acceptable in all three chemotherapy regimens. These results favor the alternating chemotherapy over either standard chemotherapy, such as CAV and PE, although the differences are not dramatic.     

Cisplatin,doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide,and etoposide combination chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer

Summary Because of potential synergistic interactions, we added 25 mg/m² i. v. cisplatin (P) 25 given on days 1–5 to the combination of 45 mg/m² i. v. doxorubicin (A) given on day 1, 800 mg/m² i. v. cyclophosphamide (C) given on day 1, and 50 mg/m² i. v. etoposide (E) given on days 1–5. The resulting PACE regimen was given every 21 days for the first three courses and then every 28 days for the next five courses. PACE was used in two trials: the first, for both limited and extensive disease, was conducted at the University of Maryland Cancer Center and North Shore University Hospital; and the second, for extensive disease, was carried out as a Cancer and Leukemia Group B pilot study. Chest irradiation was not used. Prophylactic cranial irradiation at a dose of 3,000 cGy was given to all patients achieving a complete response (CR). A total of 33 subjects were entered in the first study; 8 of the 15 (53%) presenting with limited disease and 7 of the 18 (39%) exhibiting extensive disease achieved a CR. A partial response (PR) was obtained in 27% and 33% of cases, respectively. Of the 34 patients entered in the second study, 25 were cligible; 8 (32%) achieved a CR and 6 (24%) showed a PR. Toxicity was severe in both studies, including >90% severe or life-threatening leukopenia and thrombocytopenia. Serial creatinine-clearance evaluations in the first study indicated progressive deterioration, which required discontinuation of the cisplatin before the planned completion of treatment in most cases. Since the response rate was no higher than the historic data reported for the three-drug ACE combination and because the toxicity was severe, the studies were stopped and patients were followed for survival. After a follow-up period of <6 years, the median survival was 24 months for limited disease, with 33% and 27% of the patients being alive at 3 and 6.5 years, respectively. The median survival for extensive disease was 15 and 11 months in the first and second studies, respectively. These pilot studies suggest that the addition of cisplatin may augment the activity of the ACE regimen, but at the cost of severe toxicity. Further studies seem warranted if the myelotoxicity can be better controlled.     

Weekly doxorubicin versus doxorubicin every 3 weeks in cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer

A prospective randomized study was done to determine the effect of different doxorubicin (Adriamycin [ADR], Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH) administration (schedules every week versus every 3 weeks) on the productivity of a cyclophosphamide, ADR, cisplatin (CAP) chemotherapy regimen for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Electrocardiograms, multigated cardiac scans, echocardiograms, and endomyocardial biopsies were done serially for cardiac monitoring. Of 102 patients, 47 ahd inoperable limited disease (LD), 47 had extensive disease (ED), and eight had no evidence of disease. In the last group chemotherapy was given adjuvantly. Fifty-one patients were entered into each treatment arm. The groups were formed according to extent of disease and were comparable in terms of patient characteristics. In these groups, the overall response rates using both schedules in LD patients were similar: in patients without chest irradiation previously, there was a response of 35% with ADR weekly, and 31% with ADR triweekly; in LD patients with chest irradiation previously, the response was 20% with ADR weekly, and 25% with ADR triweekly; and in ED patients, 16% with ADR weekly, and 11% with ADR triweekly. There was no significant difference in survival between the two treatment groups. However, results for all responders suggested a longer duration of response with weekly than with triweekly ADR (complete plus partial response: 35.8 versus 11.4 weeks, P = 0.06; minor response: 34 versus 11.5 weeks, P = 0.003, respectively). Results also suggested that weekly ADR was less cardiotoxic than triweekly ADR: 29% of patients in the former group had no changes or only minor changes in endomyocardial biopsy results, whereas all patients in the latter group had at least grade 0.5 changes at a similar dosage. The median doses of weekly ADR were higher at the same endomyocardial biopsy-defined toxicity levels. No correlation was found between toxic effects defined by endomyocardial biopsy results and those defined by noninvasive monitoring techniques, although the number of patients assessed was small. Weekly ADR produced less granulocytopenia and a lower incidence of fever (6% versus 16%, P less than 0.001) than did triweekly ADR. Alopecia, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were significantly less for weekly ADR than triweekly Adr (P less than 0.0005, less than 0.0005, and less than 0.005, respectively). These data suggest that weekly ADR can achieve the same therapeutic results as the standard triweekly regimen with less cardiotoxicity, myelotoxicity, alopecia, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting in patients with NSCLC.