Prevalence and phenotypic distribution of dyslipidemia in type 1 diabetes mellitus: effect of glycemic control

BACKGROUND: Data on the prevalence of dyslipidemia in type 1 diabetes mellitus are scarce and are based on total triglyceride and total cholesterol concentrations alone. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of glycemic optimization on the prevalence of dyslipidemia and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations requiring intervention in patients with type 1 diabetes. PATIENTS: A total of 334 adults with type 1 diabetes and 803 nondiabetic control subjects. METHODS: Levels of glycosylated hemoglobin, total cholesterol, total triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and LDL-C were assessed at baseline and after 3 to 6 months of intensive therapy with multiple insulin doses. RESULTS: Levels of LDL-C greater than 4.13 mmol/L (>160 mg/dL) and total triglyceride greater than 2.25 mmol/L (>200 mg/dL) and low HDL-C levels (<0.9 mmol/L [<35 mg/dL] in men or <1.1 mmol/L [<45 mg/dL] in women) were found in 16%, 5%, and 20% of patients and 13%, 6%, and 9% of controls, respectively (P<.001 for HDL-C). Diabetic women showed more hypercholesterolemia than nondiabetic women (15.6% vs 8.5%; P =.04). After glycemic optimization (mean +/- SD glycosylated hemoglobin decrease, 2.2 +/- 1.96 percentage points), the prevalence of LDL-C levels greater than 4.13 mmol/L (>160 mg/dL) became lower in diabetic men than in nondiabetic men (9.7% vs 17.5%; P =.04), but women showed frequencies of dyslipidemia similar to their nondiabetic counterparts. The proportion of patients with LDL-C concentrations requiring lifestyle (>2.6 mmol/L [>100 mg/dL]) or drug (>3.4 mmol/L [>130 mg/dL]) intervention decreased from 78% and 42% to 66% and 26%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Low HDL-C is the most frequent dyslipidemic disorder in patients with poorly controlled insulin-treated type 1 diabetes, and a high proportion show LDL-C levels requiring intervention. Less favorable lipid profiles could explain the absence of sex protection in diabetic women. The improvement caused by glycemic optimization puts forward intensive therapy as the initial treatment of choice for dyslipidemia in poorly controlled type 1 diabetes.     

Comparison of gemfibrozil and lovastatin in patients with high low-density lipoprotein and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels.

BACKGROUND--The efficacy of gemfibrozil and lovastatin in the treatment of patients who have an elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level and a low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) level was compared. METHODS--After at least 6 weeks of a cholestgerol-lowering diet, 17 patients who had a mean baseline LDL-C level above 4.14 mmol/L (160 mg/dL) and an HDL-C level below 1.03 mmol/L (40 mg/dL) received gemfibrozil 600 mg twice daily and lovastatin 20 mg twice daily each for 6 weeks according to a randomized, crossover, double-blind research design. RESULTS--Lovastatin and gemfibrozil reduced LDL-C levels 34% and 9% and raised HDL-C levels 15% and 18%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS--Lovastatin is more effective in lowering LDL-C levels and is as effective as gemfibrozil in increasing HDL-C levels in these patients.     

Effects of pravastatin on coronary events in 2073 patients with low levels of both low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol: results from the LIPID study.

AIMS: Fibrates or nicotinic acid are usually recommended for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in patients with low plasma levels of both low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) < or =140 mg/dL (< or =3.6 mmol/L) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) < or =40 mg/dL (< or =1.03 mmol/L). The LIPID trial, a randomised, placebo-controlled trial in 9014 patients at 87 centres in Australia and New Zealand, provided an opportunity to investigate the effects of an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor in patients with low LDL-C and low HDL-C. METHODS AND RESULTS: Participants in this post hoc substudy were 2073 patients aged 31-75 years with baseline LDL-C < or =140 mg/dL (< or =3.6 mmol/L), HDL-C < or =40 mg/dL (< or =1.03 mmol/L), and triglyceride < or =300 mg/dL (< or =3.4 mmol/L). The relative risk reduction with pravastatin treatment was 27% for major coronary events (95% CI 8-42%), 27% for coronary heart disease mortality (95% CI 0-47%), 21% for all-cause mortality (95% CI 0-38%), and 51% for stroke (95% CI 24-69%). The number needed to treat to prevent a major coronary event over 6 years was 22. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with pravastatin in patients with both low LDL-C and low HDL-C significantly reduced major coronary events, stroke, and all-cause mortality. The level of HDL-C is crucial to the risk of recurrent CHD events and, consequently, the benefit of lowering LDL-C.     

The effect of pravastatin on plasma lipoprotein and apolipoprotein levels in primary hypercholesterolemia. The Southeastern Michigan Collaborative Group

Pravastatin is a metabolic product of mevastatin and a potent inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase. It was investigated for its cholesterol-lowering properties in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study of 82 patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. Following a 6- to 8-week dietary lead-in period, patients were randomized to twice-daily placebo or active drug for 16 weeks. Patients receiving 10 mg of pravastatin twice a day for 8 weeks experienced mean total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level reductions of 20% (6.85 vs 5.48 mmol/L [265 vs 212 mg/dL]) and 28% (5.17 vs 3.75 mmol/L [200 vs 145 mg/dL]), respectively. At 20 mg twice a day for an additional 8 weeks, pravastatin reduced plasma total cholesterol, LDL-C, and apolipoprotein B-100 levels by 23% (6.85 vs 5.30 mmol/L [265 vs 205 mg/dL]), 31% (5.17 vs 3.59 mmol/L [200 vs 139 mg/dL]), and 23% (118 vs 91 mg/dL), respectively. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), HDLb-C, HDLb-C, and apolipoprotein A-I plasma concentrations increased by 11%, 60%, 7%, and 10%. Plasma triglyceride concentrations decreased in both the pravastatin- and placebo-treated patients. Pravastatin was generally well tolerated and an effective agent for the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia.     

Comparative effects on lipid levels of combination therapy with a statin and extended-release niacin or ezetimibe versus a statin alone (the COMPELL study)

International guidelines recommend lower target cholesterol levels and treatment of low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and elevated triglycerides for patients at moderately high to high coronary heart disease (CHD) risk. Combination therapy is often required to achieve multiple lipid treatment goals, and > or =50% reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is needed in some patients to achieve aggressive LDL-C targets. In this context, we evaluated comparative effects on lipid levels of combination therapy at low to moderate doses with a statin plus extended-release niacin (niacin ER), a statin plus ezetimibe, and a highly potent statin alone. This was an open-label, multicenter, 12-week study in 292 patients (50% women) who qualified for drug therapy based on number of CHD risk factors. Patients were randomized to four parallel arms, titrated from low to moderate or high doses: atorvastatin/niacin ER, rosuvastatin/niacin ER, simvastatin/ezetimibe, or rosuvastatin alone. Baseline mean values were, for LDL-C 197 mg/dL (5.1 mmol/L), HDL-C 49 mg/dL (1.3 mmol/L), triglycerides 168 mg/dL (1.9 mmol/L). There were no significant differences among treatment groups in the change from baseline in LDL-C at pre-specified timepoints during treatment. All groups lowered LDL-C by approximately 50% or more (range -49 to -57%), achieving mean levels of 82-98 mg/dL (2.1-2.5 mmol/L). Changes in non-HDL-C (range -46 to -55%) mirrored those for LDL-C and did not differ among treatment groups. Statin/niacin ER combination regimens also increased HDL-C and large HDL (HDL2) and lowered triglycerides and lipoprotein (a) significantly more than other regimens. No drug-related myopathy or hepatotoxicity was observed. In this study, low to moderate dose combination therapy with a statin and niacin ER provided broad control of lipids and lipoproteins independently associated with CHD.     

Lipoprotein and apolipoprotein levels in subclinical hypothyroidism. Effect of levothyroxine therapy

To assess whether subclinical hypothyroidism is associated with changes in lipoprotein fractions, 13 patients maintained in a stable state of subclinical hypothyroidism for at least 3 months were studied prior to and 2 and 4 months following restoration of a euthyroid state with incremental levothyroxine sodium therapy. Thyrotropin levels ( +/- SEM) had decreased from 16.6 +/- 3.2 mU/L to 3.1 +/- 0.7 mU/L and 3.2 +/- 0.7 mU/L at 2 months and 4 months. At 2 months, levothyroxine treatment led to a decrease in levels of total cholesterol from 5.5 +/- 0.3 mmol/L (213 +/- 12 mg/dL) to 4.8 +/- 0.3 mmol/L (186 +/- 12 mg/dL), in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from 3.7 +/- 0.3 mmol/L (143 +/- 12 mg/dL) to 2.9 +/- 0.3 mmol/L (112 +/- 12 mg/dL), and in apolipoprotein B from 91 +/- 8 mg/dL to 74 +/- 7 mg/dL. At 4 months, levels of LDL-C and apolipoprotein B remained significantly lower than pretreatment values (2.9 +/- 0.2 mmol/L [112 +/- 8 mg/dL] and 75 +/- 6 mg/dL, respectively). While high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), HDL3-C, and apolipoprotein A-I were not significantly affected by levothyroxine therapy, there was a slight trend of increase in HDL2-C during levothyroxine substitution. There was also a tendency for a decrease in triglyceride levels from 1.3 +/- 0.2 mmol/L (115 +/- 18 mg/dL) to 0.9 +/- 0.1 mmol/L (80 +/- 9 mg/dL) at 4 months of levothyroxine therapy. Levels of HDL-C tended to decrease from 4.8 +/- 0.4 mmol/L (186 +/- 15 mg/dL) to 4.5 +/- 0.5 mmol/L (174 +/- 19 mg/dL) at 2 months and to 3.9 +/- 0.4 mmol/L (151 +/- 15 mg/dL) at 4 months. The LDL-C/HDL-C ratio also decreased from 3.3 +/- 0.3 mmol/L (128 +/- 12 mg/dL) to 2.9 +/- 0.5 mmol/L (112 +/- 19 mg/dL) and 2.5 +/- 0.3 mmol/L (97 +/- 12 mg/dL) at 2 months and 4 months, respectively. These results suggest that long-term levothyroxine therapy in patients with subclinical hypothyroidism is associated with a decrease in LDL-C and apolipoprotein B levels that are reflected in a trend of decreases in cholesterol/HDL-C and LDL-C/HDL-C ratios known to have a relationship with coronary artery disease.     

Effect of combining psyllium fiber with simvastatin in lowering cholesterol

BACKGROUND: Soluble fiber supplements are recommended to reduce levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). We evaluated the LDL-C-lowering effect of psyllium husk added to low-dose simvastatin therapy. METHODS: In a 12-week blinded placebo-controlled study, patients were randomized to receive 20 mg of simvastatin plus placebo, 10 mg of simvastatin plus placebo, or 10 mg of simvastatin plus 15 g of psyllium (Metamucil) daily. Levels of total cholesterol, LDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, and apolipoprotein B were determined after 4 and 8 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: The study group comprised 68 patients. All treatments were well tolerated, and after 8 weeks the mean LDL-C levels in the group receiving 10 mg of simvastatin plus placebo fell by 55 mg/dL (1.42 mmol/L) from baseline, compared with 63 mg/dL (1.63 mmol/L) in the group receiving 10 mg of simvastatin plus psyllium (P = .03). The mean lowering of LDL-C in the group receiving 20 mg of simvastatin plus placebo was the same as that in the group receiving 10 mg of simvastatin plus psyllium. Similar results were seen for apolipoprotein B and total cholesterol. No significant changes from baseline triglyceride or high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Dietary psyllium supplementation in patients taking 10 mg of simvastatin is as effective in lowering cholesterol as 20 mg of simvastatin alone. Psyllium soluble fiber should be considered as a safe and well-tolerated dietary supplement option to enhance LDL-C and apolipoprotein B lowering.     

Elevated serum lipids in hypogonadal men with and without hyperprolactinemia

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether men with hypogonadism are at risk for hyperlipidemia. DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: Neuroendocrine clinical center of a referral-based university medical center. PATIENTS: Consecutive sample of 18 men with testosterone deficiency who had prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas, 15 men with acquired secondary hypogonadism and normal prolactin levels, and 33 normal male controls. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We found a significant elevation in fasting cholesterol (6.23 +/- 0.28 mmol/L [mean +/- SE] compared with 5.17 +/- 0.13 mmol/L [241 +/- 11 mg/dL compared with 200 +/- 5 mg/dL], P less than 0.01), low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (4.11 +/- 0.23 mmol/L compared with 3.34 +/- 0.13 mmol/L [159 +/- 9 mg/dL compared with 129 +/- 5 mg/dL], P less than 0.05), and triglycerides (1.85 +/- 0.26 mmol/L compared with 1.11 +/- 0.07 mmol/L [164 +/- 23 mg/dL compared with 98 +/- 6 mg/dL], P less than 0.001) in men with hyperprolactinemia compared with controls. In the normoprolactinemic hypogonadal men, cholesterol (6.28 +/- 0.34 mmol/L [243 +/- 13 mg/dL], P less than 0.01), LDL cholesterol (4.34 +/- 0.34 mmol/L [168 +/- 13 mg/dL], P less than 0.01), and triglycerides (1.61 +/- 0.18 mmol/L [143 +/- 16 mg/dL], P less than 0.05) were also significantly higher than in the controls, and were the same as in the hyperprolactinemic men. High density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol did not differ among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Hypogonadism in men, with or without hyperprolactinemia, may be associated with elevation of fasting serum cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides compared with normal men. These data suggest that serum lipid levels should be evaluated in hypogonadal men. The presence of lipid abnormalities may affect the decision to treat testosterone deficiency in these patients.     

A meta-analysis comparing the effect of thiazolidinediones on cardiovascular risk factors

BACKGROUND: In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, all therapeutic options should be evaluated for their effect on cardiovascular risk factors, in addition to glycemic control. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of pioglitazone hydrochloride and rosiglitazone maleate in patients with type 2 diabetes to evaluate their effect on glycemic control, lipids, blood pressure, and weight. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials of patients with type 2 diabetes that compared pioglitazone or rosiglitazone with placebo for 12 weeks were included. Primary analysis was to compare thiazolidinediones with placebo. Secondary analysis was to identify whether treatment with pioglitazone differed from rosiglitazone in any outcomes. We calculated weighted mean differences and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Twenty-three randomized controlled trials were identified. Both thiazolidinediones demonstrated similar hemoglobin A(1c) level decreases of 1.0% to 1.5% and similar increases in body weight of approximately 3.0 kg. Pioglitazone significantly lowered triglyceride level (-40 mg/dL [-0.45 mmol/L]; 95% confidence interval [CI], -53 to -26 mg/dL [-0.60 to -0.29 mmol/L]), increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) level (+4.6 mg/dL [+0.12 mmol/L]; 95% CI, 3.6 to 5.5 mg/dL [0.09 to 0.14 mmol/L]), and showed neutral effect on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and total cholesterol levels. Rosiglitazone significantly increased HDL-C level (+2.7 mg/dL [+0.07 mmol/L]; 95% CI, 2.0 to 3.4 mg/dL [0.05 to 0.09 mmol/L]), but increased LDL-C level (+15 mg/dL [+0.39 mmol/L]; 95% CI, 13 to 17 mg/dL [0.34 to 0.44 mmol/L]), total cholesterol level (+21 mg/dL [+0.54 mmol/L]; 95% CI, 18 to 25 mg/dL [0.47 to 0.65 mmol/L]), and demonstrated neutral effect on triglyceride level (-1.1 mg/dL [-0.12 mmol/L]; 95% CI, -14 to 12 mg/dL [-0.16 to 0.14 mmol/L]). No data were available on pioglitazone and blood pressure. Rosiglitazone had a neutral effect on systolic (-0.7 mm Hg; 95% CI, -2.6 to 1.1 mm Hg) and diastolic (-0.8 mm Hg; 95% CI, -1.8 to 0.3) blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Thiazolidinediones have similar effects on glycemic control and body weight. Pioglitazone produced a more favorable lipid profile. Head-to-head comparative trials as well as longer-term cardiovascular outcome studies are needed to determine whether there are differences in efficacy between the 2 thiazolidinediones.     

Clinical Observation on the Aggressive Lipid-lowering Treatment with Simvastatin on the Aged Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

Objectives To find out the efficient dose and safety of simvastatin (Zocor) on the aged patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) for aggressive lipid-lowering treatment. Methods Select 95 aged patients with CAD combined with primary hyperlipemia and give them 20mg/day of simvastatin for treatment. According to the therapeutic target of serum total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) regulate the dosage of simvastatin in follow-up. Observe 12-18 months. Results After treatment, the TC, LDL-C and triglycerides(TG) of the patients reduced by 40%，52% and 26% respectively, while there was no significant change in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). The apolipoprotein A1 arose by 14.4%, while the apolipoprotein B lowered by 25.0%. The ratio of LDL-C to HDL-C was reduced to 1.96. In the 6^th month, the 12^th month and the 18th month, respectively, 86%, 93% and 95% of the patients took 10mg/day of simvastatin and the result was their TC≤140mg/dL(3.7mmol/L) and LDL-C≤70mg/dL(1.8mmol/L).There was no special side-effect. Multi-factor analysis indicated the age of the patients was a significant factor affecting the adjustment of the dosage of simvastatin.Conclusions The therapeutic result of simvastatin on the aged patients with CAD for aggressive lipid-lowring treatment is definite, safe and the dose is lower as well.     

Effect of raw garlic vs commercial garlic supplements on plasma lipid concentrations in adults with moderate hypercholesterolemia: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Garlic is widely promoted as a cholesterol-lowering agent, but efficacy studies have produced conflicting results. Garlic supplements differ in bioavailability of key phytochemicals. We evaluated the effect of raw garlic and 2 commonly used garlic supplements on cholesterol concentrations in adults with moderate hypercholesterolemia. METHODS: In this parallel-design trial, 192 adults with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations of 130 to 190 mg/dL (3.36-4.91 mmol/L) were randomly assigned to 1 of the following 4 treatment arms: raw garlic, powdered garlic supplement, aged garlic extract supplement, or placebo. Garlic product doses equivalent to an average-sized garlic clove were consumed 6 d/wk for 6 months. The primary study outcome was LDL-C concentration. Fasting plasma lipid concentrations were assessed monthly. Extensive chemical characterization of study materials was conducted throughout the trial. RESULTS: Retention was 87% to 90% in all 4 treatment arms, and chemical stability of study materials was high throughout the trial. There were no statistically significant effects of the 3 forms of garlic on LDL-C concentrations. The 6-month mean (SD) changes in LDL-C concentrations were +0.4 (19.3) mg/dL (+0.01 [0.50] mmol/L), +3.2 (17.2) mg/dL (+0.08 [0.44] mmol/L), +0.2 (17.8) mg/dL (+0.005 [0.46] mmol/L), and -3.9 (16.5) mg/dL (-0.10 [0.43] mmol/L) for raw garlic, powdered supplement, aged extract supplement, and placebo, respectively. There were no statistically significant effects on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglyceride levels, or total cholesterol-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio. CONCLUSIONS: None of the forms of garlic used in this study, including raw garlic, when given at an approximate dose of a 4-g clove per day, 6 d/wk for 6 months, had statistically or clinically significant effects on LDL-C or other plasma lipid concentrations in adults with moderate hypercholesterolemia.     

Serum lipid effects of a high-monounsaturated fat diet based on macadamia nuts

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have identified potential beneficial effects of eating nuts, most of which have substantial amounts of monounsaturated fats. Macadamia nuts are 75% fat by weight, 80% of which is monounsaturated. OBJECTIVE: To examine variations in serum lipid levels in response to a high-monounsaturated fat diet based on macadamia nuts. METHODS: A randomized crossover trial of three 30-day diets was conducted in 30 volunteers aged 18 to 53 years from a free-living population. Each was fed a "typical American" diet high in saturated fat (37% energy from fat); an American Heart Association Step 1 diet (30% energy from fat); and a macadamia nut-based monounsaturated fat diet (37% energy from fat) in random order. Serum total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglyceride levels were measured. RESULTS: Mean total cholesterol level after the typical American diet was 5.20 mmol/L (201 mg/dL). After the Step 1 diet and the macadamia nut diet, total cholesterol level was 4.99 mmol/L (193 mg/dL) and 4.95 mmol/L (191 mg/dL), respectively. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level was 3.37 mmol/L (130 mg/dL) (typical diet), 3.21 mmol/L (124 mg/dL) (Step 1 diet), and 3.22 mmol/L (125 mg/dL) (macadamia nut diet). High-density lipoprotein cholesterol level was 1.43 mmol/L (55 mg/dL) (typical), 1.34 mmol/L (52 mg/dL) (Step 1), and 1.37 mmol/L (53 mg/dL) (macadamia nut). Lipid values after the Step 1 and macadamia nut diets were significantly different from those after the typical diet (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: The macadamia nut-based diet high in monounsaturated fat and the moderately low-fat diet both had potentially beneficial effects on cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels when compared with a typical American diet.     

Moderate and heavy alcohol consumption have no favorable effect on lipid values.

Moderate alcohol consumption has been reported to provide protection against coronary heart disease. We studied serum lipid values in 380 men, including 184 controls (37 teetotalers and 147 moderate drinkers), 90 heavy drinkers, and 106 alcoholics. Total cholesterol values were significantly lower among alcoholics than controls (mean +/- SEM, 5.43 +/- 0.15 mmol/L [210 +/- 5.8 mg/dL] vs 6.01 +/- 0.08 mmol/L [232 +/- 3.1 mg/dL]), but their high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol values were higher (1.66 +/- 0.07 mmol/L [64 +/- 2.7 mg/dL] vs 1.14 +/- 0.02 mmol/L [44 +/- 0.8 mg/dL]). Accordingly, there was a highly significant difference in the HDL/total cholesterol ratio (0.32 +/- 0.13 vs 0.19 +/- 0.01). Heavy drinkers had significantly higher total cholesterol values than controls (6.30 +/- 0.13 mmol/L [244 +/- 5.0 mg/dL] vs 6.01 +/- 0.08 mmol/L [232 +/- 3.1 mg/dL]); the same was true of HDL cholesterol values (1.25 +/- 0.07 mmol/L [48 +/- 2.7 mg/dL] vs 1.14 +/- 0.02 mmol/L [44 +/- 0.8 mg/dL]). No significant difference was found in the HDL/total cholesterol ratio between controls and heavy drinkers or between teetotalers and moderate drinkers. Therefore, moderate alcohol intake apparently does not change HDL/total cholesterol ratio; if moderate drinking is protective against coronary heart disease, the mechanism is probably not via lipids.     

依折麦布改善PCI术后患者血脂代谢和预后的临床效果

目的 观察依折麦布联合阿托伐他汀对经皮冠状动脉介入（PCI）治疗术后患者血脂代谢和预后的临床效果。 方法 根据患者降脂治疗方案不同,将PCI术后患者随机分为依折麦布联合阿托伐他汀组（联合治疗组）和单用阿托伐他汀组（阿托伐他汀组）各90例,患者降脂治疗前后均行检测血清总胆固醇（TC）、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇（LDL-C）和血清高敏C反应蛋白（hs-CRP）水平,比较两组患者TC、LDL-C和hs-CRP的变化,同时比较两组主要不良心脑血管事件（MACCE）发生情况。 结果 两组血清TC、LDL-C和hs-CRP均较治疗前显著降低,联合治疗组血清TC[（3.0±0.8）mmol/L vs.（4.2±0.9）mmol/L,P<0.05]、LDL-C[（2.0±0.8）mmol/L vs.（2.4±1.0）mmol/L,P<0.05]和hs-CRP[（2.6±5.0）mg/L vs.（3.7±4.5）mg/L,P<0.05]较阿托伐他汀组降低更显著（均P<0.05）。联合治疗组患者MACCE发生率显著低于阿托伐他汀组[7%vs.18%,P<0.05]。 结论 依折麦布联合阿托伐他汀可更好改善PCI术后患者的血清TC、LDL-C和hs-CRP水平,同时减少短期MACCE发生率,有较好的临床应用价值。     

Comparison of the effects of lean red meat vs lean white meat on serum lipid levels among free-living persons with hypercholesterolemia: a long-term, randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with hypercholesterolemia are often counseled to limit or eliminate intake of red meats, despite evidence that lean red meats (LRMs) are not hypercholesterolemic in comparison with lean white meats (LWMs). The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term effects on serum lipids of incorporating LRM (beef, veal, and pork) vs LWM (poultry and fish) into a National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Step I diet in free-living individuals with hypercholesterolemia. METHODS: Subjects included 191 men and women with a serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level of 3.37 to 4.92 mmol/L (130-190 mg/dL) and triglyceride level less than 3.96 mmol/L (350 mg/dL). After a 4-week baseline phase, subjects were counseled to follow an NCEP Step I diet including 170 g (6 oz) of lean meat per day, 5 to 7 days per week. Based on random assignment, subjects were instructed to consume at least 80% of their meat in the form of LRM or LWM. Fasting serum lipid levels were assessed 4, 12, 20, 28, and 36 weeks after randomization. RESULTS: After randomization, mean concentrations of total cholesterol (6.09 mmol/L [235.7 mg/dL] vs 6.08 mmol/L [235.2 mg/dL]) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (3.99 mmol/L [154.1 mg/dL] vs4.01 mmol/L [154.7 mg/dL]) were nearly identical in the LRM and LWM groups (1%-3% below baseline) during treatment. Mean triglyceride levels remained similar to baseline values and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations increased by approximately 2% in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The NCEP Step I diets containing primarily LRM or LWM produced similar reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and elevations in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, which were maintained throughout 36 weeks of treatment.     

Distribution of lipid phenotypes in community-living men with coronary heart disease. High prevalence of isolated low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

BACKGROUND--Risk factor modification, including treatment of dyslipidemias, has been recommended for the prevention of future coronary events in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). Since the prevalence of various dyslipidemias among outpatients with CHD has not been well documented, the purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of specific lipid phenotypes among ambulatory men with CHD. METHODS--Lipid profiles were obtained in 255 men (mean age, 65.5 +/- 9.1 years) with CHD in three Veterans Affairs medical centers. Desirable levels of lipids were defined according to National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines as follows: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels less than 3.36 mmol/L (130 mg/dL); high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels equal to or greater than 0.90 mmol/L (35 mg/dL); and triglyceride levels less than 2.83 mmol/L. RESULTS--Seventy-six percent of the group had one or more abnormalities on lipid profile: 51% had high LDL-C levels with or without abnormalities of HDL-C and/or triglyceride levels; 22% had low HDL-C levels with desirable levels of LDL-C; and 3% had hypertriglyceridemia without any cholesterol abnormalities. Normal lipid profiles were significantly more prevalent in subjects over the age of 65 years than in younger patients (40% vs 14%). CONCLUSIONS--These data suggest that (1) a high proportion of men with CHD have dyslipidemia, including 50% with LDL-C level elevations. For these men, the potential benefits of therapeutic intervention have been documented in clinical trials, although the cost-efficiency of wide-scale treatment has not been determined; (2) isolated hypertriglyceridemia is rare in this population; and (3) low HDL-C levels in association with desirable LDL-C levels are present in more than one fifth of male patients with CHD. Clinical trials focusing on this large group are urgently needed to determine whether efforts to raise HDL-C levels result in reduced cardiac morbidity and/or mortality.     

Clinical review 115: effect of thyroxine therapy on serum lipoproteins in patients with mild thyroid failure: a quantitative review of the literature

The objective of our study was to estimate the expected change in serum lipoprotein concentrations after treatment with T4 in patients with mild thyroid failure (i.e. subclinical hypothyroidism). Our data sources included MEDLINE, between January 1966 and May 1999, and review of references from relevant articles. There were 1,786 published studies identified, 461 abstracts reviewed, 74 articles retrieved, 24 articles evaluated against predetermined entry criteria, and 13 studies systematically reviewed and abstracted. All studies reported serum total cholesterol concentration changes during T4 treatment, 12 reported triglyceride changes, 10 reported high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol changes, and 9 reported low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol changes. There were 247 patients in 13 studies. The mean decrease in the serum total cholesterol concentration was -0.20 mmol/L (-7.9 mg/ dL), with a 95% confidence interval of -0.09 to -0.34. The decline in serum total cholesterol was directly proportional to its baseline concentration. Studies enrolling hypothyroid participants receiving suboptimal T4 doses reported significantly larger decreases in serum total cholesterol after thyroid-stimulating hormone normalization than studies enrolling previously untreated individuals with mild thyroid failure [-0.44 mmol/L (-17 mg/dL) vs. -0.14 mmol/L (-5.6 mg/dL), P = 0.05]. The change in serum LDL cholesterol concentration was -0.26 mmol/L (-10 mg/dL), with a 95% confidence interval of -0.12 to -0.41. Serum HDL and triglyceride concentrations showed no change. These results, although based on fewer than 250 patients, suggest that T4 therapy in individuals with mild thyroid failure lowers mean serum total and LDL cholesterol concentrations. The reduction in serum total cholesterol may be larger in individuals with higher pretreatment cholesterol levels and in hypothyroid individuals taking suboptimal T4 doses. There do not seem to be significant effects of T4 on serum HDL or triglyceride concentrations.     

Lipid and lipoprotein responses to episodic occupational and academic stress

We examined the effects of psychological stress on plasma lipid, lipoprotein, and apolipoprotein levels in three related studies. In the first study, tax accountants (N = 20) and a comparable control group (N = 20) were assessed during and after the tax season. In the second and third studies, first-year medical students (N = 24 and N = 16) were assessed at midsemester and immediately before the examinations. Across studies, the stressors induced significant psychological distress. There were no corresponding changes in lipid and lipoprotein levels. Mean stress-induced change in total cholesterol level was -0.04 mmol/L (-1.6 mg/dL) (95% confidence interval, -0.23 to 0.16 mmol/L [-9 to 6 mg/dL]) for the accountants and 0 mmol/L (0 mg/dL) (95% confidence interval, -0.16 to 0.21 mmol/L [-6 to 8 mg/dL]) and 0.10 mmol/L (4 mg/dL) (95% confidence interval, -0.18 to 0.39 mmol/L [-7 to 15 mg/dL]) for medical students in the second and third studies, respectively. In all studies, change in total cholesterol level correlated with change in total serum protein levels (r = .42 to .60). These results suggest that commonly occurring stressful situations do not produce significant changes in plasma lipid and lipoprotein levels.     

Dyslipidemia in veterans. Multiple risk factors may break the bank

The National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines for treatment of high cholesterol levels especially target patients who have multiple risk factors for coronary heart disease. Veterans have an increased prevalence of smoking, are predominantly male, and may have higher rates of other risk factors than other groups; therefore, they may require more aggressive screening and treatment for dyslipidemias. To assess the prevalence of cardiac risk factors, current cholesterol screening practices, and the potential impact of the National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines on the Veterans Affairs health care system, we reviewed 185 randomly selected charts of outpatients who were actively receiving follow-up at the Denver (Colo) Veterans Affairs Medical Center. The patients had an average age of 58.3 years and 99.5% were male. Of these patients, 60% had a serum cholesterol level checked within the last 999 days. Nearly all patients (84%) had two or more risk factors noted. The mean cholesterol level was 5.85 mmol/L (226 mg/dL), with 72% of patients having levels above 5.20 mmol/L (200 mg/dL) and 36.1% having levels above 6.20 mmol/L (240 mg/dL). Of patients who had their cholesterol level checked, 69% (77/111) would require lipoprotein analysis by National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines (cholesterol, greater than or equal to 6.20 mmol/L [greater than or equal to 240 mg/dL] or 5.15 to 6.20 mmol/L [200 to 239 mg/dL] with two or more risk factors), yet only 16% (12/77) had lipoprotein analyses done. Extrapolating from these data, the Denver Veteran Affairs Medical Center, which cares for 28,000 patients, has more than 19,000 patients who would need lipoprotein analysis to meet current guidelines. Full evaluation and subsequent treatment of dyslipidemias in veterans would require tremendous financial and manpower commitments.     

Day-to-day variability of serum cholesterol, triglyceride, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Impact on the assessment of risk according to the National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines

The National Cholesterol Education Program has recently published guidelines for the assessment of cardiovascular risk and goals for laboratory accuracy. To test the impact of biologic and analytic variability on the ability of a single lipid measurement to assess risk accurately, lipids were measured on three occasions in 51 volunteers. Notable day-to-day variability of total cholesterol (5%), triglyceride (20%), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (10%), and calculated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (8%) levels was found. Analytic variability contributed significantly to total variability of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and calculated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Confidence intervals constructed around National Cholesterol Education Program cutoff points suggested that classification was reliable from a single measurement if total cholesterol value was below 4.78 (less than 185 mg/dL), between 5.56 and 5.81 (215 and 225 mg/dL), or above 6.59 mmol/L (greater than 225 mg/dL). Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol value classification from a single measurement was only accurate at below 3.00 (greater than 116 mg/dL) or above 4.50 mmol/L (greater than 174 mg/dL). This study documents significant day-to-day variability of serum lipids and suggests that patients near the National Cholesterol Education Program cutoff points may require repeated measurements to assign risk accurately.