Pharmacokinetic variability of newer antiepileptic drugs: when is monitoring needed?

A new generation of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) has reached the market in recent years with ten new compounds: felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, pregabalin, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin and zonisamide. The newer AEDs in general have more predictable pharmacokinetics than older AEDs such as phenytoin, carbamazepine and valproic acid (valproate sodium), which have a pronounced inter-individual variability in their pharmacokinetics and a narrow therapeutic range. For these older drugs it has been common practice to adjust the dosage to achieve a serum drug concentration within a predefined 'therapeutic range', representing an interval where most patients are expected to show an optimal response. However, such ranges must be interpreted with caution, since many patients are optimally treated when they have serum concentrations below or above the suggested range. It is often said that there is less need for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) with the newer AEDs, although this is partially based on the lack of documented correlation between serum concentration and drug effects. Nevertheless, TDM may be useful despite the shortcomings of existing therapeutic ranges, by utilisation of the concept of 'individual reference concentrations' based on intra-individual comparisons of drug serum concentrations. With this concept, TDM may be indicated regardless of the existence or lack of a well-defined therapeutic range.The ten newer AEDs all have different pharmacological properties, and therefore, the usefulness of TDM for these drugs has to be assessed individually. For vigabatrin, a clear relationship between drug concentration and clinical effect cannot be expected because of its unique mode of action. Therefore, TDM of vigabatrin is mainly to check compliance. The mode of action of the other new AEDs would not preclude the applicability of TDM. For the prodrug oxcarbazepine, TDM is also useful, since the active metabolite licarbazepine is measured.For drugs that are eliminated renally completely unchanged (gabapentin, pregabalin and vigabatrin) or mainly unchanged (levetiracetam and topiramate), the pharmacokinetic variability is less pronounced and more predictable. However, the dose-dependent absorption of gabapentin increases its pharmacokinetic variability. Drug interactions can affect topiramate concentrations markedly, and individual factors such as age, pregnancy and renal function will contribute to the pharmacokinetic variability of all renally eliminated AEDs. For those of the newer AEDs that are metabolised (felbamate, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine and zonisamide), pharmacokinetic variability is just as relevant as for many of the older AEDs. Therefore, TDM is likely to be useful in many clinical settings for the newer AEDs. The purpose of the present review is to discuss individually the potential value of TDM of these newer AEDs, with emphasis on pharmacokinetic variability.     

儿童抗癫痫药物治疗药物监测

抗癫痫药物（AEDs）是治疗癫痫的主要药物,现有27种抗癫痫药物,这使得治疗药物监测（TDM）的应用越来越广泛,同时,抗癫痫药物也是进行TDM最常见的药物。第一代抗癫痫药物卡马西平、苯巴比妥、苯妥英钠、乙琥胺、扑米酮、丙戊酸在TDM方面积累了很多经验,现在TDM将更多地应用于新的抗癫痫药物如醋酸艾司利卡西平、非氨酯、加巴喷丁、拉科酰胺、拉莫三嗪、左乙拉西坦、奥卡西平、吡仑帕奈、哌拉西坦、普瑞巴林、瑞替加滨、卢非酰胺、司替戊醇、噻加宾、托吡酯、氨己烯酸和唑尼沙胺。本文通过对样本类型、样本的采集和处理、参考范围的概念进行综述,旨在为儿童抗癫痫用药的药物监测提供依据。     

新型抗癫痫药之间及其与传统抗癫痫药的相互作用和机制*

分别综述了几种新型抗癫痫药（托吡酯、非氨酯、奥卡西平、拉莫三嗪、唑尼沙胺、左乙拉西坦、噻加宾、加巴喷丁及氨己烯酸）与传统抗癫痫药联合应用时以及这些新型抗癫痫药之间的相互作用及其发生机制，阐明细胞色素P450酶和葡萄糖苷酸转移酶在新型抗癫痫药的相互作用中的意义及重要性。为临床合理联合应用提供理论依据，提高抗癫痫治疗的可靠性、安全性和有效性。     

The new antiepileptic drugs: pharmacological and clinical aspects

In recent years several new drugs (oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, topiramate, gabapentin, zonisamide, tiagabine, fosphenytoin, vigabatrin and felbamate) have been added to the therapeutic armamentarium against epilepsy. Some of these represent structural modifications of pre-existing compounds, others were developed with the specific objective of modifying neurotransmitter function, and many more were found to be clinically useful even though their mode of action is unclear or differs from that originally planned. The pharmacokinetics of these drugs differ widely from one agent to another. Some (gabapentin and vigabatrin) are eliminated unchanged in urine and have little or no interaction potential; others (tiagabine, lamotrigine, topiramate, oxcarbazepine, zonisamide, felbamate) are subject to induction of metabolism by concomitant anticonvulsants; lamotrigine is vulnerable to metabolic inhibition by valproate, and felbamate is a powerful enzyme inhibitor in addition to being an inducer of the metabolism of carbamazepine and steroid oral contraceptives. All new antiepileptic drugs have been found to be effective in improving seizure control in patients with partial and secondarily generalized seizures. However, lamotrigine, topiramate, zonisamide and felbamate appear to have broader efficacy against both partial and many generalized seizure types, while vigabatrin is also valuable in the management of infantile spasms. In monotherapy studies, new drugs have not been found to be more efficacious than older agents, but some may offer limited advantages in terms of improved tolerability. On the other hand, serious toxicity restricts considerably the use of vigabatrin and felbamate. Overall, new drugs represent valuable tools in the fight against epilepsy, but because of limited experience and cost considerations their first-line use cannot be recommended in most situations.     

Selection criteria for the clinical use of the newer antiepileptic drugs

In recent years, several new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have been licensed: felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin and zonisamide. These drugs have proven efficacy as add-on therapy in patients with difficult-to-treat partial epilepsy, as 20-50% of patients treated in add-on trials experienced a seizure reduction of >or=50%. Relatively few trials have been conducted to evaluate these drugs as monotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. In the monotherapy trials that have been conducted, the newer drugs were often as efficacious as conventional drugs, and their tolerability was often better. However, the methodology of these trials can be criticised. Because of the relative lack of robust data for the newer agents, the conventional drugs have thus far maintained their status as first-line monotherapy. However, when first-line monotherapy fails, an alternative drug has to be chosen from the available conventional and newer drugs. This article aims to give detailed background information on the newer AEDs in order to enable physicians to make a rational choice from the available drugs for individual patients. Data are provided for the different newer AEDs on mechanisms of action; efficacy in refractory partial epilepsy, newly diagnosed epilepsy in adults and generalised seizure types; adverse effects; pharmacokinetics; and use in special patient categories.     

Pharmacokinetic variability of new antiepileptic drugs at different ages

Newer generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are increasingly used to treat epilepsies in infants, children, and the elderly. For rational prescribing in these populations, it is essential to understand the pharmacokinetic changes that occur during development and aging. Data obtained in recent years indicate that the apparent oral clearance (CL/F) of lamotrigine, topiramate, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, gabapentin, tiagabine, zonisamide, vigabatrin, and felbamate is considerably higher in children than in adults,the magnitude of the difference being on average in the order of 20%to 120%, depending on the drug and the age distribution of the assessed population. Information on the pharmacokinetics of these drugs in newborns is completely lacking or very sparse. Studies in the elderly have demonstrated that significant pharmacokinetic changes also occur at the other extreme of age. On average, CL/F values of newer generation AEDs have been found to be reduced by 10% to 50% compared with those found in young or middle-aged adults.These pharmacokinetic changes are clinically important and con-tribute to age-related differences in dosage requirements.     

The pharmacokinetics and interactions of new antiepileptic drugs: an overview

In the past decade 10 new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs)have been introduced: felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetem, oxcarbazepine, pregabalin, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin,and zonisamide. The pharmacokinetics (PK) of these new AEDs as well as their potential for drug interactions are reviewed in this article.In general, new AEDs have better PK profiles and are less involved in drug interactions than the 4 established AEDs: phenobarbital,phenytoin, carbamazepine, and valproic acid. However, in spite of the large therapeutic arsenal of old and new AEDs, about 30% of epileptic patients are still not seizure-free, and thus, there is a substantial need to develop new AEDs.     

Chemical properties of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs)

Between 1990 and 2011 the following fifteen new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were approved: eslicarbazepine acetate, felbamate, gabapentin, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, pregabalin, retigabine, rufinamide, stiripentol, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, and zonisamide. These AEDs (except felbamate) offer appreciable advantages in terms of their favorable pharmacokinetics, improved tolerability and lower potential for drug interactions. All AEDs introduced after 1990 that are not second generation drugs (with the exception of vigabatrin and tiagabine) were developed empirically (sometimes serendipitously) utilizing mechanism-unbiased anticonvulsant animal models. The empirical nature of the discovery of new AEDs in the last three decades coupled with their multiple mechanisms of action explains their diverse chemical structures. The availability of old and new AEDs with various activity spectra and different tolerability profiles enables clinicians to better tailor drug choice to the characteristics of individual patients. With fifteen new AEDs having entered the market in the past 20years the antiepileptic market is crowded. Consequently, epilepsy alone is not attractive in 2011 to the pharmaceutical industry even though the clinical need of refractory epilepsy remains unmet. Due to this situation, future design of new AEDs must also have a potential in non-epileptic CNS disorders such as neuropathic pain, migraine prophylaxis and bipolar disorder or fibromyalgia as demonstrated by the sales revenues of pregabalin, topiramate and valproic acid. This review analyzes the effect that the emerging knowledge on the chemical properties of the old AEDs starting from phenobarbital (1912) has had on the design of subsequent AEDs and new therapeutics as well as the current approach to AED discovery.     

Pharmacologic management of epilepsy in the elderly

OBJECTIVE: To review the epidemiology and pharmacologic management of epilepsy in elderly patients. DATA SOURCES: Controlled trials, case studies, and review articles identified via MEDLINE using the search terms epilepsy, seizures, elderly, phenobarbital, primidone, phenytoin, carbamazepine, valproic acid, felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, topiramate, tiagabine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, and zonisamide. Recently published standard textbooks on epilepsy were also consulted. DATA SYNTHESIS: Epilepsy is a common neurologic disorder in the elderly. Cerebrovascular and neurodegenerative diseases are the most common causes of new-onset seizures in these patients. Alterations in protein binding, distribution, elimination, and increased sensitivity to the pharmacodynamic effects of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are relatively frequent, and these factors should be assessed at the initiation, and during adjustment, of treatment. Drug-drug interactions are also an important issue in elderly patients, because multiple drug use is common and AEDs are susceptible to many interactions. In addition to understanding age-related changes in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of AEDs, clinicians should know the common seizure types in the elderly and the spectrum of AED activity for these seizure types. AEDs with activity against both partial-onset and generalized seizures include felbamate, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, topiramate, valproic acid, and zonisamide. Other AEDs discussed in this review (carbamazepine, gabapentin, phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone, and tiagabine) are most useful for partial-onset seizures. CONCLUSION: The provision of safe and effective drug therapy to elderly patients requires an understanding of the unique age-related changes' in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of AEDs as well as an appreciation of common seizure types and the drugs that are effective for the specific types seen in the elderly.     

Interactions between antiepileptic drugs and hormonal contraception

An interaction between antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and the combined oral contraceptive pill was first proposed when the dose of estradiol in the oral contraceptive pill was reduced from 100 to 50 microg. There was a higher incidence of breakthrough bleeding and contraceptive failure among women with epilepsy compared with women in general. Since then, interaction studies have been undertaken to look for possible interactions between AEDs and the combined oral contraceptive pill. Phenobarbital (phenobarbitone), phenytoin, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, felbamate and topiramate have been shown to increase the metabolism of ethinylestradiol and progestogens. Therefore, if a women is on one of the AEDs and wishes to take the oral contraceptive pill, she will need to take a preparation containing at least 50 microg of ethinylestradiol. Levonorgestrel implants are contraindicated in women receiving these AEDs because of cases of contraceptive failure. It is recommended that medroxyprogesterone injections be given every 10 rather than 12 weeks to women who are receiving AEDs that induce hepatic microsomal enzymes. There are no interactions between the combined oral contraceptive pill, progesterone-only pill, medroxyprogesterone injections or levonorgestrel implants and the AEDs valproic acid (sodium valproate), vigabatrin, lamotrigine, gabapentin, tiagabine, levetiracetam, zonisamide, ethosuximide and the benzodiazepines. Therefore, normal dose contraceptive preparations can be used in patients receiving these AEDs.     

Anticonvulsants and breast feeding: a critical review

Progress in the diagnosis and management of seizure disorders and the availability of effective anticonvulsive medications has enabled increasing numbers of epileptic women of child-bearing age to raise families. Breast feeding, which these women may wish to choose, provides health, nutritional, immunological, developmental, social, economic and environmental benefits. The traditional anticonvulsants, such as phenytoin, carbamazepine and valproic acid (valproate sodium), are generally considered safe for use during breast feeding; however, observation for adverse effects is recommended. The use of phenobarbital while breast feeding is controversial because of its slow elimination by the nursing infant. The newer anticonvulsants, such as clobazam, felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine, topiramate, and vigabatrin, are used mainly as adjunctive therapy. Data on the use of these drugs in pregnancy and lactation, and regarding long term effects on cognition and behaviour, are sparse. Weighing the benefits of breast feeding against the potential risk to the nursing infant, breast feeding is considered to be safe when the mother is taking carbamazepine, valproic acid or phenytoin. Infant monitoring for potential adverse effects is advisable when the mother is taking phenobarbital, clobazam, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine or vigabatrin. Monitoring of infant serum drug concentrations is advisable but not compulsory. The use of felbamate, tiagabine and topiramate during breast feeding should await further study.     

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions between oral contraceptives and second-generation anticonvulsants

Drug interactions between oral contraceptives (OCs) and traditional anticonvulsants have been well described. However, in the past decade, a number of new anticonvulsants have been developed, as well as modifications made in the composition of the OC preparations themselves. Additionally, anticonvulsants are increasingly employed in the therapy of nonseizure-related disorders, placing more women at risk of potential drug interactions that may lead to contraceptive failure. Second-generation anticonvulsants include felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin and zonisamide. Most have been approved for adjunctive management of seizures refractory to therapy with traditional anticonvulsants. On the basis of available study data in women receiving concomitant OC preparations, gabapentin, lamotrigine, tiagabine and vigabatrin may be administered without significant pharmacokinetic interactions that potentially diminish contraceptive efficacy. However, additional or alternative contraceptive measures, including using OCs with higher estrogen content, are recommended when using felbamate, oxcarbazepine and topiramate, as these agents have demonstrated enzyme-inducing activity leading to reduced plasma steroid concentrations. The effects of zonisamide in women receiving OCs have yet to be reported. It is important to characterise the properties [e.g. substrate and enzyme activity (particularly cytochrome P450 3A4 induction)] of new anticonvulsants and recognise their potential to interfere with OCs. However, a pharmacokinetic interaction does not in itself indicate loss of OC efficacy. Contraceptive failure should be measured by changes in ovarian hormone concentrations, maturation of ovarian follicle(s) or ovulation.     

New antiepileptic drugs: review on drug interactions.

During the Past decade, nine new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) namely, Felbamate, Gabapentin, Levetiracetam, Lamotrigine, Oxcarbazepine, Tiagabine, Topiramate, Vigabatrin and Zonisamide have been marketed worldwide. The introduction of these drugs increased appreciably the number of therapeutic combinations used in the treatment of epilepsy and with it, the risk of drug interactions. In general, these newer antiepileptic drugs exhibit a lower potential for drug interactions than the classic AEDs, like phenytoin, carbamazepine and valproic acid, mostly because of their pharmacokinetic characteristics. For example, vigabatrin, levetiracetam and gabapentin, exhibit few or no interactions with other AEDs. Felbamate, tiagabine, topiramate and zonisamide are sensitive to induction by known anticonvulsants with inducing effects but are less vulnerable to inhibition by common drug inhibitors. Felbamate, topiramate and oxcarbazepine are mild inducers and may affect the disposition of oral contraceptives with a risk of failure of contraception. These drugs also inhibit CYP2C19 and may affect the disposition of phenytoin. Lamotrigine is eliminated mostly by glucuronidation and is susceptible to inhibition by valproic acid and induction by classic AEDs such as phenytoin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital and primidone.     

Therapeutic monitoring of the new antiepileptic drugs

Objective: To discuss the potential value of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of the new antiepileptic drugs gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin and zonisamide. Methods: A review of studies of the relationship between plasma concentrations and effects of new antiepileptic drugs is provided. Furthermore, the potential value of TDM of these drugs is discussed in relation to their mode of action and their pharmacokinetic properties. The various methods that are available for analysing plasma concentrations of the new antiepileptic drugs are also briefly reviewed. Results: The available information on the relationship between plasma concentrations and effects of the new drugs is scarce. For most drugs, wide ranges in concentrations associated with seizure control are reported, and a considerable overlap with drug levels among non-responders and also with concentrations associated with toxicity is often noted. However, very few studies have been designed primarily to explore the relationship between drug plasma concentrations and effects. Consequently, there are no generally accepted target ranges for any of the new antiepileptic drugs. Although the available documentation clearly is insufficient, the pharmacological properties of some of the drugs, in particular lamotrigine, zonisamide and, possibly, oxcarbazepine, topiramate and tiagabine, suggest that they may be suitable candidates for TDM. Conclusion: TDM of some of the new antiepileptic drugs may be of value in selected cases, although routine monitoring in general cannot be recommended at this stage. Further systematic studies designed specifically to investigate concentration–effect relationships of the new antiepileptic drugs are urgently needed. Received: 16 September 1999 / Accepted in revised form: 9 October 1999     

Anticonvulsants in the treatment of bipolar mania

A series of antiepileptic drugs have been investigated in terms of their ability to treat mania (with later applications for the treatment of bipolar depression and prevention of relapses). These include divalproex, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, tiagabine, topiramate and zonisamide. Although these drugs are all antiepileptic in action, they bring about these effects by different mechanisms; in particular, their impact on GABA differs significantly. Perhaps for this reason, their impact on mania varies greatly, with double-blind significant results evident only for valproate, carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine. Only valproate and carbamazepine are approved by the US FDA for use in mania; oxcarbazepine has never been found significantly effective in large-scale studies. Of the other options, both gabapentin and topiramate failed in large-scale investigations; tiagabine failed in small sample reports. Although lamotrigine has been successful in the prevention of depression relapse in bipolar disorder, it has not been effective in treating mania. Finally, there are no findings of large scale double-blind studies on the use of levetiracetam and zonisamide. A review of the kinetics, side effects and complications of the antiepileptic drugs indicates that carbamazepine is useful, and has adverse event benefit over all other options. The potential of zonisamide awaits further testing.     

New anti-epileptic drugs for the 21st century

Prior to 1993, there were only six major drugs available in the US for the treatment of patients with epilepsy. These included phenobarbital (PB), phenytoin (PHT), carbamazepine (CBZ), primidone (PRIM), valproic acid/sodium valproate (VPA) and ethosuximide (ESX). Of these drugs, VPA has the broadest spectrum of activity and ESX the most limited. Despite these six agents, as well as several secondary drugs, it is estimated that over 30% of patients have inadequate seizure control, while others, whose disease is adequately controlled, suffer from bothersome adverse events (AEs). Since 1993, ten new drugs have entered the worldwide market (not all in the US). Those released include felbamate (FBM), gabapentin (GBP), lamotrigine (LTG), topiramate (TPM), tiagabine (TGB), oxcarbazepine (OXC), levetiracetam (LVT), zonisamide (ZNS), clobazam (CLB) and vigabatrin (VGB). The purpose of this article is to review each of the above drugs, looking at efficacy, safety, tolerability and where they may play a role in the current treatment of epilepsy.     

Antiepileptic drug treatment in the nineties in The Netherlands.

In this review the state of the art of treating patients with epilepsy in the nineties in the Netherlands is presented. It describes general strategies for treatment with antiepileptic drugs and the history of development of the classical anticonvulsant drugs. Eight new drugs, including vigabatrin, lamotrigine, felbamate, oxcarbazepine, gabapentin, tiagabine, levetiracetam and topiramate are discussed. A review of their pharmacological and clinical properties is presented. Dutch experience with these drugs is included.     

Clinical pharmacokinetics of new-generation antiepileptic drugs at the extremes of age

In recent years, several new-generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have been introduced in clinical practice. These agents, which include felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, pregabalin, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin and zonisamide, are being increasingly used in the treatment of epilepsy at the extremes of age. For a rational prescribing of these drugs in specific age groups, major pharmacokinetic changes that occur during development and aging need to be taken into consideration. A review of available evidence indicates that the apparent oral clearance (CL/F) of new-generation AEDs in children is increased by 20-170% (depending on the type of drug and characteristics of the patients studied) compared with adults, with the highest CL/F values usually being observed in the youngest age groups. These findings do not necessarily apply to the first weeks of life, when drug eliminating capacity is still undergoing maturation, as in the case of lamotrigine for which preliminary data suggest that CL/F in neonates aged <2 months can be much lower than in infants aged 2-12 months. At the other extreme of age, in the elderly, CL/F is almost invariably reduced (on average by 10-50%) compared with values found in non-elderly adults. Age-related CL/F changes, together with the large interindividual pharmacokinetic variability, contribute to the need for individualised dosage requirements in these patients. Measurement of serum drug concentrations can be useful as an aid to dosage individualization in these age groups but interpretation of therapeutic drug monitoring data should also take into account the possibility of age-related changes in pharmacodynamic sensitivity and, for neonates and the elderly, alterations in drug binding to serum proteins.     

New anti-epileptic drugs for the 21st century

Prior to 1993, there were only six major drugs available in the US for the treatment of patients with epilepsy. These included phenobarbital (PB), phenytoin (PHT), carbamazepine (CBZ), primidone (PRIM), valproic acid/sodium valproate (VPA) and ethosuximide (ESX). Of these drugs, VPA has the broadest spectrum of activity and ESX the most limited. Despite these six agents, as well as several secondary drugs, it is estimated that over 30% of patients have inadequate seizure control, while others, whose disease is adequately controlled, suffer from bothersome adverse events (AEs). Since 1993, ten new drugs have entered the worldwide market (not all in the US). Those released include felbamate (FBM), gabapentin (GBP), lamotrigine (LTG), topiramate (TPM), tiagabine (TGB), oxcarbazepine (OXC), levetiracetam (LVT), zonisamide (ZNS), clobazam (CLB) and vigabatrin (VGB). The purpose of this article is to review each of the above drugs, looking at efficacy, safety, tolerability and where they may play a role in the current treatment of epilepsy.