Phase I study of a combination of s-1 and weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer

OBJECTIVE: A phase I study of weekly intravenous paclitaxel combined with a fixed dose of S-1, a dihydropyrimidine-dehydrogenase-inhibitory oral fluoropyrimidine, was conducted for patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer (ARGC). Endpoints of this study were to examine the toxicity profile OF this regimen and to determine the recommended dose (rd) of paclitaxel. METHODS: S-1 was fixed at a dose of 80 mg/m(2) per day and was administered for 2 weeks (days 1--14) followed by a 2-week rest. Two dose levels of paclitaxel (level 1: 60 mg/m(2), level 0: 50 mg/m(2)) were studied. Paclitaxel was infused over 1 h on days 1, 8, and 15. Plasma sampling was performed to characterize the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of paclitaxel in some patients. Fifteen patients were enrolled (6 patients in level 1, and 9 patients in level 0). Dose-limiting toxicities were defined as grade 4 hematological (including grade 3 febrile neutropenia) and grade 3 non-hematological (except anorexia, nausea, vomiting and depilation) toxicities. RESULTS: Three of 6 patients in level 1 developed grade 4 neutropenia or grade 3 febrile neutropenia, and 1 of them also showed grade 3 diarrhea, which settled the maximum-tolerated dose at this level. At level 0, 2 of 9 patients developed grade 4 neutropenia or grade 3 febrile neutropenia, and the RD of paclitaxel for this protocol was set at this level. Pharmacologic studies demonstrated the persistence of significant serum paclitaxel levels over 24 h after drug administration at both levels. Objective responses according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors were observed in 3 of 6 patients who had measurable disease. CONCLUSION: A combination of S-1 and weekly paclitaxel was feasible and well tolerated, and is suggested to produce a worthwhile response in ARGC. These results warrant further investigation, and a phase II study has already been started.     

A phase II study of weekly paclitaxel for advanced or recurrent breast cancer

The present study investigated the efficacy and safety of weekly administration of paclitaxel (PTX) for 37 patients with advanced or recurrent breast cancer. PTX was administered at a dose of 60 mg/m(2), 6 times every 8 weeks. The mean number of treatment cycles was 2.1, and the mean number of administrations was 12.7. Response rate was 35.1%. Two patients achieved CR, 11 PR, 13 NC (3 patients of long NC), 9 PD, and 2 NE. The clinical benefit rate (CR+PR+NC) was 70.3%. Median survival time was 733 days, and median time to treatment failure was 151 days. Grade 3 or more leucopenia and neutropenia occurred in 3 of patients (8.1%), and no patients showed hypersensitivity reaction after administration of PTX. Weekly PTX (60 mg/m(2)) is one of the treatment options in advanced or recurrent breast cancer from the standpoint of palliation.     

Phase I study of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide in patients with advanced or recurrent breast cancer

BACKGROUND: A phase I clinical study of combination chemotherapy with docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (CPA) was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the incidence and severity of toxicities and the pharmacokinetics in patients with advanced or recurrent breast cancer. METHODS: Docetaxel was administered by intravenous drip infusion over 60 minutes, followed by intravenous bolus injection of CPA every 3-4 weeks. The dosage of docetaxel/CPA was 40/200, 40/400, 50/400, or 60/400 mg/m(2)/day. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were enrolled and received a total of 33 cycles of the combined therapy. The dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were leukopenia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. The MTD was estimated to be docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) in combination with CPA 400 mg/m(2) per day. Plasma clearance of both drugs was similar regardless of dose. The recommended doses of docetaxel/CPA for a phase Utrial are 50/400 mg/m(2)/day every 3-4 weeks. CONCLUSION: The MTD of this combined therapy was docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) and CPA 400 mg/m(2). Neutropenia and leukopeina were common and severe. It is important to stress the need for modification of the dosing scheme.     

Evaluation of weekly paclitaxel and doxifluridine (5'-DFUR) combination therapy in patients with advanced or recurrent breast cancer

To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of weekly paclitaxel and 5'-DFUR combination therapy in advanced or recurrent breast cancer, 13 patients were enrolled in this pilot study. 5'-DFUR was administered orally at a dose of 800 mg/day for 14 consecutive days, and paclitaxel was administered by 1 hour infusion at a dose of 80 mg/m2 after short premedication on day 1 and 8. This was repeated every 3 weeks, until disease progression or severe side effects precluded further treatment. Antiemetic agents and G-CSF were also administered, as needed. Nine patients had not received prior therapy, and four patients had received prior anthracycline containing therapy, two of whom were concomitantly receiving docetaxel treatment. Median administration time was 14 weeks, and median time to progression was 16.6 weeks. The overall response rate was 46.2% with 7.7% complete response and 38.5% partial response, and the response rate was consistent regardless of metastatic sites. Two patients achieved stable disease for at least 6 months and the clinical benefit was 61.5%. Responses were observed in 25% of the patients with prior anthracycline therapy. Grade 3/4 side effects involved leukopenia in 15.4%, peripheral neuropathy in 7.7%, malaise in 23.1% and nausea in 7.7%. There were no complaints of severe diarrhea. Although one patient withdrew from this study because of a hypersensitive reaction, this regimen was generally well tolerated and QOL was high enough so that it was possible to continue the regimen. Weekly paclitaxel and 5'-DFUR combination therapy seems to be feasible and effective in patients with advanced or recurrent breast cancer.     

Phase I study of weekly vinorelbine in combination with weekly paclitaxel in adult patients with advanced refractory cancer

Vinorelbine and paclitaxel are highly active antineoplastic agents. Preclinical data indicate a potential for antitumor synergy for a number of common tumor types when they are combined. We investigated a novel weekly schedule of both agents. Eighteen patients with advanced cancer were entered onto this phase I trial. Vinorelbine and paclitaxel were given weekly in combination for 6 consecutive weeks, followed by a 2-week break. Sequential cohorts of patients were treated at two dose levels: Vinorelbine 22.5 mg/m² followed by paclitaxel 40 mg/m² and Vinorelbine 22.5 mg/m² followed by paclitaxel 60 mg/m². Ten patients completed at least one 8-week course of therapy. Neutropenic myelosuppression was dose limiting at level II. Neurotoxicity was not dose limiting. Objective responses were seen in patients with esophageal, lung, and breast cancer and suggest that this is an active regimen worthy of further investigation in selected diseases. Phase II trials of this regimen are in progress.     

Phase I/II trial of combination therapy with S-1 and weekly paclitaxel in patients with unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer

Purpose  We aimed to examine the safety and antitumor effects of a combination of S-1 and paclitaxel in patients with unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer in a phase I/II setting. Patients and methods  The study was designed as a phase I/II clinical trial. In phase I portion, the dose of paclitaxel was escalated to estimate the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of paclitaxel with fixed dose of S-1. S-1 (daily dose, 80 mg/m²) was given orally on days 1–21 every 35-day cycle (rest on days 22–35). Paclitaxel was administered intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15, at an initial dose of 40 mg/m², stepping up to 70 mg/m² in 10-mg/m² increment. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 4 hematological toxicity, grade 3 or higher nonhematological toxicity, and treatment discontinuation due to adverse reactions during the first course of treatment. In phase II portion, the efficacy and toxicity at the RD of paclitaxel with S-1 were assessed. Results  The MTD of paclitaxel was estimated to be 60 mg/m², because >33.3% of patients (2/3) developed DLTs. DLT included postponement of treatment due to grade 2 neutropenia, and grade 3 stomatitis, anorexia, and nausea. Therefore, the RD of paclitaxel was estimated to be 50 mg/m². In the phase II portion, 22 patients were evaluated with 50 mg/m² paclitaxel and 80 mg/m² S-1 in a 35-day cycle. The response rate was 54.5% (95% CI, 32.2–75.6%). The median survival time was 283 days (95% CI, 218–508 days). The median number of treatment courses was 4 (range 1–10), indicating that this regimen could be given repeatedly. Conclusions  This phase I/II trial of combination therapy with S-1 and paclitaxel in patients with unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer showed that this regimen has substantial antitumor activity and can be given safely.     

Efficacy of weekly docetaxel therapy for advanced or recurrent breast cancer]

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of weekly docetaxel (weekly TXT) in cases of advanced or recurrent breast cancer, 31 patients were enrolled in this pilot study of weekly TXT given at 25 mg/m2/w. Each cycle consisted of 3 weeks of therapy followed by a 1-week treatment break in an outpatient setting. Patients received a median of 15 infusions with a median cumulative dose of 680 mg. The median time to treatment failure was 8 months. The overall response rate was 32.3%, and 22.6% of patients had stable disease for at least 6 months. The response rate was consistent regardless of prior chemotherapy with anthracycline. There was no grade 3 or 4 toxicity, and the regimen was generally well tolerated. Although 37.5% of patients had grade 1 or 2 nail change, myelosuppression, fatigue, nausea, vomiting and fluid retention were mild. Weekly TXT seems to be an effective and feasible treatment for advanced or recurrent breast cancer patients.     

Phase I study of MetXia-P450 gene therapy and oral cyclophosphamide for patients with advanced breast cancer or melanoma.

PURPOSE: MetXia-P450 is a novel recombinant retroviral vector that encodes the human cytochrome P450 type 2B6 gene (CYP2B6), Escherichia coli lacZ, and neomycin resistance marker genes. Cytochrome P450 enzymes are primarily expressed in the liver and convert the prodrug cyclophosphamide to an active phosphoramide mustard and acrolein. Gene-based delivery of CYP2B6 to the tumor site leads to local prodrug activation and higher concentrations of the active metabolites at the target site. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: MetXia-P450 was directly injected into metastatic cutaneous tumor nodules on days 1 and 2 and nodules biopsied on day 7. Oral cyclophosphamide (100 mg/m(2)) was administered between days 8 and 22. Subsequent cycles of oral cyclophosphamide were repeated for 2 of 4 weeks. Gene transfer levels in biopsy samples were measured by histologic and quantitative PCR analyses. Safety assessments were made using PCR for vector dissemination to the blood after injection and using PCR and serologic analyses to detect replicating virus. Secondary end points included clinical response, toxicity, and evaluation of antitumor immune responses by measurement of carcinoembryonic antigen and 5T4 antibodies. RESULTS: Twelve patients with breast cancer (n = 9) and melanoma (n = 3) received three dose levels of MetXia-P450 ( approximately 8 x 10(5), approximately 8 x 10(6), and approximately 8 x 10(7) lacZ transferring units/mL). The product was safe and well tolerated. The lacZ transgene was detected in biopsy material by immunohistochemistry in 10 of 12 patients and integrated viral sequences by PCR in 3 of 6 patients. One (8%) patient with breast cancer had a partial response and received 7 months of oral cyclophosphamide. Four (33%) patients had stable disease for > or =3 months and the rest had progressive disease. Preliminary immunologic analyses were suggestive of an antitumor response in two patients (partial response in one patient and stable disease in one patient). CONCLUSION: MetXia was safe and well tolerated. Gene transfer was detected at all dose levels, and the initial suggestion of an antitumor response indicates that MetXia-P450 should undergo further clinical assessment.     

Phase I study of the combination of nedaplatin and weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose This trial was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), principal toxicity, and recommended dose for phase II study of the combination of nedaplatin and weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods Patients with previously untreated NSCLC, either stage IIIB with pleural effusion or stage IV, were eligible if they had a performance status of 0–2, were 75 years or younger, and had adequate organ function. The respective doses of nedaplatin (day 1) and weekly paclitaxel (days 1, 8, and 15) studied were 80/60, 80/70, 80/80, 80/90, and 100/90 (mg m⁻²), repeated every 4 weeks. Results From May 2004 through June 2005, 21 patients (18 men and 3 women; median age, 63 years; age range, 53–75 years) were enrolled. The MTD was determined to be 100 mg m⁻² of nedaplatin and 90 mg m⁻² of weekly paclitaxel. Dose-limiting toxicities at the MTD were neutropenic fever and hepatic dysfunction. We recommend doses of 80 mg m⁻² of nedaplatin and 90 mg m⁻² of weekly paclitaxel for phase II study. Grade 3–4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia in 29% of patients, thrombocytopenia in 0%, and anemia in 5%. Although the most frequent non-hematologic toxicity was hepatic dysfunction, all cases were only mildly to moderately severe. Although two patients had grade 3 or 4 pulmonary toxicity due to Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, these patients recovered after receiving trimetoprim-sulfamethoxazole, steroid therapy, and supplemental oxygen. There were no treatment-related deaths. The overall response rate was 19.0% (95% confidence interval, 5.4–41.9%), and all responses were in patients receiving the recommended doses. The median dose-intensities for nedaplatin and paclitaxel were 91.6 and 87.1%, respectively, of the planned doses. Conclusion This combination chemotherapy is active and well tolerated and warrants phase II study.     

Efficacy of biweekly paclitaxel therapy in advanced or recurrent breast cancer

To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a biweekly schedule of paclitaxel in advanced or recurrent breast cancer, 18 patients were enrolled in this pilot study. Paclitaxel of 120 mg/m2 was administered over 3 hours, and cycles were repeated every two weeks until disease progression or toxicity precluded further treatment. Patients received a median of 10 infusions with actual dose intensity of 55.9 mg/m2/wk, and median time to progression was 4.8 months. The overall response rate was 33.3%, and one patient achieved stable disease for at least 6 months. The responders included patients who received prior anthracycline and/or docetaxel treatment, and the response rate was consistent regardless of metastatic sites. Myelosuppression was the most common toxicity, and a few patients needed G-CSF support, treatment delay or dose reduction because of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia or leukopenia. Although one patient withdrew from this study because of grade 3 sensory disturbance, this regimen was generally well tolerated. A biweekly schedule of paclitaxel seems to be feasible and effective in patients with advanced or recurrent breast cancer.     

Phase I study of pazopanib in combination with weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors

Purpose.

To evaluate the maximum tolerated regimen (MTR), dose-limiting toxicities, and pharmacokinetics of pazopanib, an oral small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and c-Kit, in combination with paclitaxel.

Patients and Methods.

Pazopanib was given daily with weekly paclitaxel on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. Dose levels of pazopanib (mg/day)/paclitaxel (mg/m²) were 400/15, 800/15, 800/50, and 800/80. An expanded cohort was enrolled at the MTR. Plasma samples were collected to evaluate the effect of pazopanib, an inhibitor of cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4, on the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel, a CYP3A4 and CYP2C8 substrate.

Results.

Of 26 enrolled patients, 17 were treated at the MTR of 800 mg pazopanib and 80 mg/m² paclitaxel. Dose-limiting toxicities included a grade 3 abscess and grade 2 hyperbilirubinemia. Other toxicities included elevated liver transaminases and diarrhea. Six patients (23%) had partial responses and 15 patients (58%) had stable disease. Administration of 800 mg pazopanib resulted in a 14% lower paclitaxel clearance and a 31% higher paclitaxel maximal concentration than with administration of paclitaxel alone at 15, 50, and 80 mg/m². At the MTR, coadministration of 800 mg pazopanib and 80 mg/m² paclitaxel resulted in a 26% higher geometric mean paclitaxel area under the curve.

Conclusion.

Pazopanib, at a dose of 800 mg daily, can be safely combined with a therapeutic dose of paclitaxel at 80 mg/m² when administered on days 1, 8, and 15, every 28 days. The observed greater plasma concentrations of paclitaxel given concurrently with pazopanib suggest that pazopanib is a weak inhibitor of CYP3A4 and CYP2C8.     

Phase I study of weekly paclitaxel in combination with pazopanib and lapatinib in advanced solid malignancies

Background:

We assessed the maximum tolerated regimen (MTR) and dose-limiting toxicities of pazopanib and lapatinib in combination with weekly paclitaxel, and the effect of pazopanib and lapatinib on paclitaxel pharmacokinetics.

Methods:

Patients received intravenous paclitaxel on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle concurrently with daily pazopanib and lapatinib. Dose levels of paclitaxel (mg m⁻²)/pazopanib(mg)/lapatinib(mg) were 50/400/1000, 50/800/1000, 80/800/1000, and 80/400/1000. At the MTR, additional patients were enrolled to further evaluate tolerability, and the potential effects of pazopanib and lapatinib, inhibitors of cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4, on the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel, a CYP2C8 and CYP3A4 substrate.

Results:

Twenty-six patients were enrolled. Dose-limiting toxicities at the MTR (80/400/1000) included grade 4 thrombosis and grade 3 aspartate aminotransferase elevation. Other toxicities included diarrhoea, neutropenia, fatigue, and liver enzyme elevations. Coadministration of pazopanib 400 mg and lapatinib 1000 mg increased paclitaxel maximum plasma concentration (38%) and area under the curve (37%) relative to paclitaxel alone. One patient with a salivary gland tumour had a partial response; three patients had stable disease (⩾6 months).

Conclusions:

Pazopanib 400 mg per day and lapatinib 1000 mg per day can be combined with paclitaxel 80 mg m⁻² in 28-day cycles. Coadministration of pazopanib and lapatinib, weak inhibitors of CYP2C8 and CYP3A4, had an inhibitory effect on paclitaxel clearance.     

Usefulness of weekly administration of paclitaxel for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer

We report herein the efficacy and feasibility of weekly administration of paclitaxel for advanced/recurrent gastric cancer retrospectively. Eleven patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer who had received prior chemotherapy were treated with this regimen. Seventy mg of paclitaxel per m2 dissolved in 250 ml 5% glucose was administered by 1-hour intravenous infusion once a week for 3 weeks followed by 1 week rest. To avoid hypersensitivity reactions, the following short premedication was given to all the patients 1 hour before paclitaxel treatment: Dexamethasone 20 mg intravenously (i.v.), diphenhydramine 50 mg i.v., and ranitidine 50 mg i.v. Treatment cycle was 1 to 23 with an average cycle of 5.4. The response rate was 33% (2/6 with measurable lesions), the median time to progression was 104 days, and the median survival time was 160 days. Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in 27.2% of the patients. Weekly paclitaxel may be a promising regimen as a second-line chemotherapy for advanced/recurrent gastric cancer. However, special attention needs to be paid to the neutropenic adverse effect in gastric cancer patients with poor performance status than 2 (greater).     

Phase I evaluation of continuous 5-fluorouracil infusion followed by weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a phase I trial of escalating doses of weekly paclitaxel (Taxol) in combination with a fixed systemic administration of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. METHODS: Patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer were treated with escalating doses of weekly paclitaxel as a 60 min intravenous (i.v.) infusion, along with a fixed dose of continuous 5-FU infused over 5 days. Plasma sampling was performed to characterize the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of paclitaxel. RESULTS: Eighteen patients received combination therapy at four dose levels of weekly Taxol, ranging from 60 to 90 mg/m2/week. Dose-limiting toxicities > grade 3 were observed at the 90 mg/m2/week dose level. Toxicities included anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea and alopecia. Two episodes of grade 4 neutropenia occurred in two of the three patients receiving this dose. At each dose level, pharmacological studies documented the persistence of significant serum paclitaxel levels over 24 h after drug administration. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for this regimen was 90 mg/m2/week of paclitaxel for 3 weeks plus 600 mg/m2/day of continuous 5-FU for 5 days. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of weekly paclitaxel and 5-FU demonstrated an acceptable toxicity profile and feasible pharmacokinetic results suggesting its practical applicability. Based on these findings, the recommended dose and schedule for phase II study of combination chemotherapy is paclitaxel 80 mg/m2/week x 3 over 4 weeks, and continuous 5-FU 600 mg/m2/day x 5 days every 4 weeks.     

Two cases of recurrent breast cancer successfully treated with paclitaxel weekly therapy

The patients were a 57-year-old and a 38-year-old woman who had supraclavicular lymph node and multiple lung metastases from breast cancer. They were given 3 and 4 courses of paclitaxel (TXL) weekly therapy (80 mg/m2, day 1, 8, 15, repeated every 4 weeks). One patient had received docetaxel (TXT) and CEF therapy previously. There were no severe adverse effects except leukopenia, neutropenia and alopecia. The weekly TXL therapy brought complete remission against the supraclavicular lymph node and multiple lung metastases. The durations of the response to this weekly therapy were 15 and 5 months, respectively, and their effects have continued to the present. We believe that the weekly TXL therapy is a well-tolerated, feasible and safe administration schedule on an outpatient basis, and improves the patient's quality of life. Furthermore, we suggest the possibility of TXL being effective against both TXT and anthracycline-resistant breast cancer.     

Examination of the safety of docetaxel/cyclophosphamide combination therapy for advanced recurrent breast cancer

In the treatment of recurrent breast cancer in patients previously treated with anthracycline drugs, taxane drugs are generally used. This time, we retrospectively studied the safety of docetaxel/cyclophosphamide combination therapy (hereinafter referred to as TC therapy). Ten patients (mean age: 52.8 years old) were included in the study. Metastatic/recurrent sites included 3 skin, 2 each of contralateral breast, lung and bone, and 1 each of liver, carcinomatous pleurisy and supraclavicular lymph node. Seven patients had a history of anthracycline treatment. The patients received TC at doses of 60 mg/m(2) and 500 mg/m(2), respectively, every 3 weeks. With regard to adverse events, non-hematotoxic events included alopecia in all the patients, generalized malaise in 5, and abnormal nail in 1. Hematotoxic events were grades 2 and 3 decreased neutrophil count in 5 patients. One patient had grade 4 pyrexia associated with oral candida. The patient was admitted and treated with fluid replacement and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). There were no other patients in whom the treatment was prolonged or dosage was reduced due to adverse reactions. TC therapy is considered to be a beneficial treatment method in terms of safety since it can be instituted on an outpatient basis.