Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in a large population of patients without revascularisation: registry data on the impact of calcium score

Purpose

This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) for detecting significant coronary artery stenosis (??50% lumen reduction) at different coronary calcium score (CACS) values with conventional coronary angiography (CAG) as the reference standard.

Material and methods

A total of 1,500 patients (928 men, mean age 58.2??12.5 years) in sinus rhythm who underwent CTCA (64-slice technology) and CAG were enrolled. Diagnostic accuracy and likelihood ratios (LR) of CTCA were evaluated against CAG for the total population and in different CACS classes (0; 1?C10; 11?C100; 101?C400; 401?C1,000; >1,000).

Results

The prevalence of obstructive disease was 51% (23.5% single vessel; 27.5% multivessel; progressive increase from 17.9% to 94% through the CACS classes). In the per-patient analysis, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of CTCA were 99%, 92%, 94% and 99%, respectively. Per-patient analysis showed a worse PPV of CTCA (76?C77%) in classes with low CACS (1?C10/11?C100). Per-patient LR were higher in classes with extreme CACS values (0 = LR+ 18.3 and LR? = 0.0; c1,000 = LR+ 17.0 and LR? = 0.0) with values always >7 for LR+ and <0.033 for LR? for all CACS classes.

Conclusions

CTCA is a reliable diagnostic modality, with high sensitivity and NPV regardless of CACS.     

Prognostic value of Morise clinical score, calcium score and computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease

Purpose

Our aim was to determine the prognostic value of computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA), coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) and Morise clinical score in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD).

Materials and methods

A total of 722 patients (480 men; 62.7±10.9 years) who were referred for further cardiac evaluation underwent CACS and contrast-enhanced CTCA to evaluate the presence and severity of CAD. Of these, 511 (71%) patients were without previous history of CAD. Patients were stratified according to the Morise clinical score (low, intermediate, high), to CACS (0?C10, 11?C100, 101?C400, 401?C1,000, >1,000) and to CTCA (absence of CAD, nonsignificant CAD, obstructive CAD). Patients were followed up for the occurrence of major events: cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina and revascularisation.

Results

Significant CAD (>50% luminal narrowing) was detected in 260 (36%) patients; nonsignificant CAD (<50% luminal narrowing) in 250 (35%) and absence of CAD in 212 (29%). During a mean follow-up of 20±4 months, 116 events (21 hard) occurred. In patients with normal coronary arteries on CTCA, the major event rate was 0% vs. 1.7% in patients with nonsignificant CAD and 7.3% in patients with significant CAD (p<0.0001). Three hard events (14%) occurred in patients with CACS??100 and two (9.5%) in patients with intermediate Morise score; one revascularisation was observed in a patient with low Morise score. At multivariate analysis, diabetes, obstructive CAD and CACS >1,000 were significant predictors of events (p<0.05).

Conclusions

An excellent prognosis was noted in patients with a normal CTCA (0% event rate). CACS ??100 and low-intermediate Morise score did not exclude the possibility of events at follow-up.     

Assessment of coronary artery disease and calcified coronary plaque burden by computed tomography in patients with and without diabetes mellitus

Purpose

To compare the coronary atherosclerotic burden in patients with and without type-2 diabetes using CT Coronary Angiography (CTCA).

Methods and Materials

147 diabetic (mean age: 65?±?10?years; male: 89) and 979 nondiabetic patients (mean age: 61?±?13?years; male: 567) without a history of coronary artery disease (CAD) underwent CTCA. The per-patient number of diseased coronary segments was determined and each diseased segment was classified as showing obstructive lesion (luminal narrowing >50%) or not. Coronary calcium scoring (CCS) was assessed too.

Results

Diabetics showed a higher number of diseased segments (4.1?±?4.2 vs. 2.1?±?3.0; p??400 (p?p?p?p?=?0.003) and obstructive CAD (12.5% vs. 3.8%, p?=?0.01). Among patients with CCS????10 all diabetics with obstructive CAD had a zero CCS and one patient was asymptomatic.

Conclusions

Diabetes was associated with higher coronary plaque burden. The present study demonstrates that the absence of coronary calcification does not exclude obstructive CAD especially in diabetics.     

Diagnostic performance of computed tomography coronary angiography to detect and exclude left main and/or three-vessel coronary artery disease

Objectives

To determine the diagnostic performance of CT coronary angiography (CTCA) in detecting and excluding left main (LM) and/or three-vessel CAD (“high-risk” CAD) in symptomatic patients and to compare its discriminatory value with the Duke risk score and calcium score.

Materials and methods

Between 2004 and 2011, a total of 1,159 symptomatic patients (61?±?11 years, 31 % women) with stable angina, without prior revascularisation underwent both invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and CTCA. All patients gave written informed consent for the additional CTCA. High-risk CAD was defined as LM and/or three-vessel obstructive CAD (≥50 % diameter stenosis).

Results

A total of 197 (17 %) patients had high-risk CAD as determined by ICA. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive and negative likelihood ratios of CTCA were 95 % (95 % CI 91–97 %), 83 % (80–85 %), 53 % (48–58 %), 99 % (98–99 %), 5.47 and 0.06, respectively. CTCA provided incremental value (AUC 0.90, P?<?0.001) in the discrimination of high-risk CAD compared with the Duke risk score and calcium score.

Conclusions

CTCA accurately excludes high-risk CAD in symptomatic patients. The detection of high-risk CAD is suboptimal owing to the high percentage (47 %) of overestimation of high-risk CAD. CTCA provides incremental value in the discrimination of high-risk CAD compared with the Duke risk score and calcium score.

Key Points

? Computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) accurately excludes high-risk coronary artery disease. ? CTCA overestimates high-risk coronary artery disease in 47?%. ? CTCA discriminates high-risk CAD better than clinical evaluation and coronary calcification.     

Computed tomography coronary angiography accuracy in women and men at low to intermediate risk of coronary artery disease

Objectives

To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of CT coronary angiography (CTCA) in women at low to intermediate pre-test probability of coronary artery disease (CAD) compared with men.

Methods

In this retrospective study we included symptomatic patients with low to intermediate risk who underwent both invasive coronary angiography and CTCA. Exclusion criteria were previous revascularisation or myocardial infarction. The pre-test probability of CAD was estimated using the Duke risk score. Thresholds of less than 30?% and 30–90?% were used for determining low and intermediate risk, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of CTCA in detecting obstructive CAD (≥50?% lumen diameter narrowing) was calculated on patient level. P?<?0.05 was considered significant.

Results

A total of 570 patients (46?% women [262/570]) were included and stratified as low (women 73?% [80/109]) and intermediate risk (women 39?% [182/461]). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were not significantly different in and between women and men at low and intermediate risk. For women vs. men at low risk they were 97?% vs. 100?%, 79?% vs. 90?%, 80?% vs. 80?% and 97?% vs. 100?%, respectively. For intermediate risk they were 99?% vs. 99?%, 72?% vs. 83?%, 88?% vs. 93?% and 98?% vs. 99?%, respectively.

Conclusion

CTCA has similar diagnostic accuracy in women and men at low and intermediate risk.

Key Points

? Coronary artery disease (CAD) is increasingly investigated by computed tomography angiography (CTCA). ? CAD detection or exclusion by CTCA is not different between sexes. ? CTCA diagnostic accuracy was similar between low and intermediate risk sex-specific-groups. ? CTCA rarely misses obstructive CAD in low–intermediate risk women and men. ? CAD yield by invasive coronary angiography after positive CTCA is similar between sex-risk-specific groups.     

Computed tomography coronary angiography in asymptomatic patients

Purpose

This study assessed the accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography (CT-CA) for detecting significant coronary artery disease (CAD; ??50% lumen reduction) in intermediate/high-risk asymptomatic patients.

Materials and methods

A total of 183 consecutive asymptomatic individuals (92 men; mean age 54??11 years) with more than one major risk factor (obesity, hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolaemia, family history, smoking) and an inconclusive or nonfeasible noninvasive stress test result (stress electrocardiography, stress echocardiography, nuclear stress scintigraphy) underwent CT-CA in an outpatient setting. All patients underwent conventional coronary angiography (CAG) within 4 weeks. Data from CT-CA were compared with CAG regarding the presence of significant CAD (??50% lumen reduction).

Results

Mean calcium score was 177??432, mean heart rate during the CT-CA scan was 58??8 bpm and the prevalence (per-patient) of obstructive CAD was 19%. CT-CA showed single-vessel CAD in 9% of patients, two-vessel CAD in 9% and three-vessel CAD in 0%. Per-patient sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of CT-CA were 100% (90?C100), 98% (96?C99), 97% (85?C99), 100% (97?C100), respectively. Positive and negative likelihood ratios were 151 and 0, respectively.

Conclusions

CT-CA is an excellent noninvasive imaging modality for excluding significant CAD in intermediate/ high-risk asymptomatic patients with inconclusive or nonfeasible noninvasive stress test.     

Diagnostic accuracy of second-generation dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography with iterative reconstructions: a real-world experience

Purpose

The authors evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of second-generation dual-source (DSCT) computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) with iterative reconstructions for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD).

Materials and methods

Between June 2010 and February 2011, we enrolled 160 patients (85 men; mean age 61.2±11.6 years) with suspected CAD. All patients underwent CTCA and conventional coronary angiography (CCA). For the CTCA scan (Definition Flash, Siemens), we use prospective tube current modulation and 70-100 ml of iodinated contrast material (Iomeprol 400 mgI/ ml, Bracco). Data sets were reconstructed with iterative reconstruction algorithm (IRIS, Siemens). CTCA and CCA reports were used to evaluate accuracy using the threshold for significant stenosis at ??50% and ??70%, respectively.

Results

No patient was excluded from the analysis. Heart rate was 64.3±11.9 bpm and radiation dose was 7.2±2.1 mSv. Disease prevalence was 30% (48/160). Sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of CTCA in detecting significant stenosis were 90.1%, 93.3%, 53.2% and 99.1% (per segment), 97.5%, 91.2%, 61.4% and 99.6% (per vessel) and 100%, 83%, 71.6% and 100% (per patient), respectively. Positive and negative likelihood ratios at the per-patient level were 5.89 and 0.0, respectively.

Conclusions

CTCA with second-generation DSCT in the real clinical world shows a diagnostic performance comparable with previously reported validation studies. The excellent negative predictive value and likelihood ratio make CTCA a first-line noninvasive method for diagnosing obstructive CAD.     

Restriction of the referral of patients with stable angina for CT coronary angiography by clinical evaluation and calcium score: impact on clinical decision making

Objective

To investigate the value of the calcium score (CaSc) plus clinical evaluation to restrict referral for CT coronary angiography (CTCA) by reducing the number of patients with an intermediate probability of coronary artery disease (CAD).

Methods

We retrospectively included 1,975 symptomatic stable patients who underwent clinical evaluation and CaSc calculation and CTCA or invasive coronary coronary angiography (ICA). The outcome was obstructive CAD (≥50 % diameter narrowing) assessed by ICA or CTCA in the absence of ICA. We investigated two models: (1) clinical evaluation consisting of chest pain typicality, gender, age, risk factors and ECG and (2) clinical evaluation with CaSc. Discrimination of the two models was compared. The stepwise reclassification of patients with an intermediate probability of CAD (10–90 %) after clinical evaluation followed by clinical evaluation with CaSc was assessed by clinical net reclassification improvement (NRI).

Results

Discrimination of CAD was significantly improved by adding CaSc to the clinical evaluation (AUC: 0.80 vs. 0.89, P?<?0.001). CaSc and CTCA could be avoided in 9 % using model 1 and an additional 29 % of CTCAs could be avoided using model 2. Clinical NRI was 57 %.

Conclusion

CaSc plus clinical evaluation may be useful in restricting further referral for CTCA by 38 % in symptomatic stable patients with suspected CAD.

Key Points

? CT calcium scores (CaSc) could proiritise referrals for CT coronary angiography (CTCA) ? CaSc provides an incremental discriminatory value of CAD compared with clinical evaluation ? Risk stratification is better when clinical evaluation is combined with CaSc ? Appropriate use of clinical evaluation and CaSc helps avoid unnecessary CTCA referrals     

Prognostic value of CT coronary angiography: focus on obstructive vs. nonobstructive disease and on the presence of left main disease

Purpose

The authors investigated the prognostic value of computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD), with particular focus on left main (LM) disease and obstructive vs. nonobstructive disease.

Materials and methods

A total of 727 consecutive patients (485 men, age 62±11years) with suspected (514; 70.1%) or known (213; 29.9%) CAD underwent CTCA. Patients were followed up for the occurrence of MACE (i.e. cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, percutaneous/surgical revascularisation).

Results

A total of 117 MACE [five cardiac deaths, 11 acute myocardial infarctions (AMI), five unstable angina, 86 percutaneous coronary interventions, ten coronary artery bypass grafts] occurred during a mean follow-up of 20 months. Severity and extension of CAD was associated with a progressively worse prognosis. The event rate was 0% among patients with normal coronary arteries at CTCA. The presence of LM disease was not associated with a worse prognosis either in patients with no history of CAD or in those with a history of CAD. At multivariate analysis, presence of obstructive CAD and diabetes were the only independent predictors of MACE.

Conclusions

Evaluation of atherosclerotic burden by CTCA provides an independent prognostic value for prediction of MACE. Patients with normal CTCA findings have an excellent prognosis at follow-up.     

Prognostic value of computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with chest pain of suspected cardiac origin

Purpose

The authors sought to determine the prognostic value of computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) in patients with acute chest pain (ACP).

Materials and methods

A total of 145 consecutive patients (75 men; 64??12 years) with ACP were referred from the Emergency Department for CTCA, which was performed with a standard protocol using a 64-slice scanner. Patients were stratified according to the Morise clinical score (low, intermediate, high) and to the CTCA findings [absence of coronary artery disease (CAD), nonobstructive CAD, obstructive CAD]. Patients were followed up for the occurrence of major events: cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina and revascularisation.

Results

One hundred and twenty-seven (87.6%) patients were without a history of CAD, and 18 (12.4%) patients had a history of CAD. Obstructive CAD (>50% luminal narrowing) was detected in 35 (24%) patients; nonobstructive CAD (??50% luminal narrowing) in 62 (43%) and absence of CAD in 48 (33%) patients. During a mean follow-up of 20??3 months, 20 events occurred (four hard events). Sixteen events (three hard events) occurred in patients without a history of CAD, and four events (one hard event) occurred in patients with a history of CAD. In patients with absence of CAD as detected by CTCA, the rate of events was 0%. At multivariate analysis, hypercholesterolaemia and obstructive CAD were significant predictors of events (p<0.05).

Conclusions

An excellent prognosis was observed in patients with ACP and normal CTCA. CTCA shows the potential for optimal stratification of patients with ACP.     

Computed tomography coronary angiography in the selection of outlier patients: a feasibility report

Purpose

This study evaluated criteria, presence and distribution of outlier patients by means of computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) in a large institutional database.

Material and methods

From a population of 2,881 consecutive patients (1,842 men, mean age 62±13 years) in sinus rhythm who underwent CTCA, we extracted data on patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). We selected patient outliers in the fifth and sixth decades of life with the following criteria: ??3 risk factors and absence of CAD, zero to one risk factors and ??5 diseased coronary segments. Diabetes was excluded from risk factors because of the different impact on CAD.

Results

The patient population consisted of 2,432 individuals with suspected CAD (1,495 men, age 62±13 years). The prevalence of obstructive CAD (??50% lumen reduction at CTCA) was 36% (863/2,432). Patients with normal coronary arteries accounted for 34% of the total (837/2,432; 431 men, age 55±14 years). Of these, 210 were in the fifth and 231 in the 6th decade (men 196, women 245); those with ??3 risk factors accounted for 4.2% of the total (102/2,432; men 42, women 60). Patients with ??5 diseased coronary segments accounted for 28% of the total (686/2,432; 510 men, age 68±10 years). Of these, 115 were in the fifth and 270 in the sixth decade (men 309, women 76); those with zero to one risk factors accounted for 3.0% (73/2,432; men 66, women 7).

Conclusions

CTCA is a reliable noninvasive diagnostic modality that can be used to identify outlier patients. This will enable dedicated trials aimed at characterising biomarkers and genomics of protective and nonprotective factors against CAD and its complications.     

Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in a large population of patients without revascularisation: registry data in NSTEMI acute coronary syndrome and influence of gender and risk factors

Purpose

This study sought to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) for detecting significant coronary artery stenosis (??50% lumen reduction) compared with conventional coronary angiography (CAG) in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction-acute coronary syndrome (NSTEMI-ACS) and in subgroups selected by gender and number of risk factors (RF).

Materials and methods

We selected from a population of 1,500 patients in a multicentre registry with NSTEMI-ACS who had undergone CTCA and CAG, (n=237; 187 men, mean age 63±10 years). Diagnostic accuracy and likelihood ratios (LR) of CTCA were assessed against CAG in the total population and subgroups (men, women: 0 RF = absence of RF, 1?C2 RF = presence of one or two RF, >2 RF = presence of more than two RF).

Results

The prevalence of obstructive disease was 53%. In the per-patient analysis, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of CTCA were 100% (men 100%; women 100%; 0 RF 100%; 1?C2 RF 100%; >2 RF 100%), 95% (men 98%; women 50%; 0 RF NA% (NA, not assessable); 1?C2 RF 96%; >2 RF 96%), 95% (men 98%; women 91%; 0 RF 91%; 1?C2 RF 96%; >2 RF 96%), 100% (men 100%; women 100%; 0 RF NV%; 1?C2 RF 100%; >2 RF 100%), respectively. The per-segment analysis showed a reduction in PPV (ranging between 56% and 67%). The per-patient LR+ ranged between 18 and 27, whereas LR-were always 0. We observed no significant differences in diagnostic accuracy between subgroups.

Conclusions

CTCA is a reliable diagnostic modality with high sensitivity and NPV in NSTEMI-ACS patients who are not candidates for early revascularisation, regardless of gender and number of risk factors.     

Diagnostic accuracy of high-pitch dual-source CT for the assessment of coronary stenoses: first experience

Objectives

The objective was to prospectively investigate the diagnostic accuracy of high-pitch (HP) dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) compared with catheter coronary angiography (CCA) for the diagnosis of significant coronary stenoses.

Methods

Thirty-five patients (seven women; mean age 62?±?8 years) underwent both CTCA and CCA. CTCA was performed with a second-generation dual-source CT system permitting data acquisition at an HP of 3.4. Patients with heart rates >60 bpm were excluded from study enrolment. All coronary segments were evaluated by two blinded and independent observers with regard to image quality on a four-point scale (1: excellent to 4: non-diagnostic) and for the presence of significant coronary stenoses (defined as diameter narrowing exceeding 50%). CCA served as the standard of reference. Radiation dose values were calculated using the dose-length product.

Results

Diagnostic image quality was found in 99% of all segments (455/459). Non-diagnostic image quality occurred in a single patient with a sudden increase in heart rate immediately before and during CTCA. Taking segments with non-evaluative image quality as positive for disease, the sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were 94, 96, 80 and 99% per segment and 100, 91, 88 and 100% per patient. The effective radiation dose was on average 0.9?±?0.1 mSv.

Conclusion

In patients with heart rates ≤60 bpm, CTCA using the HP mode of the dual-source CT system is associated with high diagnostic accuracy for the assessment of coronary artery stenoses at sub-milliSievert doses.     

Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in a large population of patients without revascularisation: registry data on the comparison between male and female population

Purpose

This study was undertaken to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) for detecting significant coronary artery stenosis (??50% lumen reduction) compared with conventional coronary angiography (CAG) in a male and female population.

Material and methods

A total of 1,372 patients (882 men, 490 women; mean age 59.3 ± 11.9 years) in sinus rhythm imaged with CTCA (64-slice technology) and CAG were enrolled. Diagnostic accuracy and likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR?) of CTCA were assessed against CAG for the male and female populations.

Results

The prevalence of obstructive disease was 53% (men 58%; women 43%). CAG demonstrated the absence of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in 47% (men 42%; women 56%), single-vessel disease in 25% (men 36%; women 22%) and multivessel disease in 29% (men 32%; women 23%) of patients. In the per-patient analysis, sensitivity, specificity and positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values of CTCA were 99% (men 98%; women 100%), 92% (men 92%; women 92%), 94% (men 95%; women 90%) and 99% (men 98%; women 100%), respectively. The per-patient likelihood ratios (LR) in the total population (LR+=12.4 and LR?=0.011), the male (LR+=12.9 and LR?=0.016) and female (LR =11.9 and LR?=0) populations were very good. We observed no significant differences in diagnostic accuracy between male and female populations.

Conclusions

CTCA is a reliable diagnostic modality with high sensitivity and NPV in the female population.     

Diagnostic accuracy of 128-slice dual-source CT coronary angiography: a randomized comparison of different acquisition protocols

Objectives

To compare the diagnostic performance and radiation exposure of 128-slice dual-source CT coronary angiography (CTCA) protocols to detect coronary stenosis with more than 50 % lumen obstruction.

Methods

We prospectively included 459 symptomatic patients referred for CTCA. Patients were randomized between high-pitch spiral vs. narrow-window sequential CTCA protocols (heart rate below 65 bpm, group A), or between wide-window sequential vs. retrospective spiral protocols (heart rate above 65 bpm, group B). Diagnostic performance of CTCA was compared with quantitative coronary angiography in 267 patients.

Results

In group A (231 patients, 146 men, mean heart rate 58?±?7 bpm), high-pitch spiral CTCA yielded a lower per-segment sensitivity compared to sequential CTCA (89 % vs. 97 %, P?=?0.01). Specificity, PPV and NPV were comparable (95 %, 62 %, 99 % vs. 96 %, 73 %, 100 %, P?>?0.05) but radiation dose was lower (1.16?±?0.60 vs. 3.82?±?1.65 mSv, P?<?0.001). In group B (228 patients, 132 men, mean heart rate 75?±?11 bpm), per-segment sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were comparable (94 %, 95 %, 67 %, 99 % vs. 92 %, 95 %, 66 %, 99 %, P?>?0.05). Radiation dose of sequential CTCA was lower compared to retrospective CTCA (6.12?±?2.58 vs. 8.13?±?4.52 mSv, P?<?0.001). Diagnostic performance was comparable in both groups.

Conclusion

Sequential CTCA should be used in patients with regular heart rates using 128-slice dual-source CT, providing optimal diagnostic accuracy with as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) radiation dose.

Key Points

? 128-slice dual-source CT coronary angiography offers several different acquisition protocols. ? Randomized comparison of protocols reveals an optimal protocol selection strategy. ? Appropriate CTCA protocol selection lowers radiation dose, while maintaining high quality. ? CTCA protocol selection should be based on individual patient characteristics. ? A prospective sequential protocol is preferred for CTCA.     

The impact of CT radiation dose reduction and iterative reconstruction algorithms from four different vendors on coronary calcium scoring

Objectives

To analyse the effects of radiation dose reduction and iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms on coronary calcium scoring (CCS).

Methods

Fifteen ex vivo human hearts were examined in an anthropomorphic chest phantom using computed tomography (CT) systems from four vendors and examined at four dose levels using unenhanced prospectively ECG-triggered protocols. Tube voltage was 120 kV and tube current differed between protocols. CT data were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and reduced dose CT data with IR. CCS was quantified with Agatston scores, calcification mass and calcification volume. Differences were analysed with the Friedman test.

Results

Fourteen hearts showed coronary calcifications. Dose reduction with FBP did not significantly change Agatston scores, calcification volumes and calcification masses (P?>?0.05). Maximum differences in Agatston scores were 76, 26, 51 and 161 units, in calcification volume 97, 27, 42 and 162 mm³, and in calcification mass 23, 23, 20 and 48 mg, respectively. IR resulted in a trend towards lower Agatston scores and calcification volumes with significant differences for one vendor (P?Conclusions CCS derived from standard FBP acquisitions was not affected by radiation dose reductions up to 80 %. IR resulted in a trend towards lower Agatston scores and calcification volumes.

Key points

? In this ex vivo study, radiation dose could be reduced by 80 % for coronary calcium scoring ? Iterative reconstruction resulted in a trend towards lower Agatston scores and calcification volumes ? Caution should be taken for coronary calcium scoring with iterative reconstruction     

Coronary artery calcium score and CT angiography in asymptomatic elderly patients with high pretest probability for coronary artery disease

Purpose

To evaluate the role of coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) and/or coronary CT angiography (CCTA) in asymptomatic elderly patients with high pretest probability for coronary artery disease (CAD).

Materials and methods

Forty-eight consecutive asymptomatic elderly (>65 years) subjects who had a high pretest probability and underwent CACS/CCTA were included. Each CCTA was evaluated for adequacy for assessment of coronary stenosis. Significant stenosis (>50 % diameter narrowing) was assessed on evaluable CT images and by invasive catheter angiography (ICA).

Results

All subjects were men with mean CACS of 880 ± 1779. Among those with low (0–99), intermediate (100–399), and high (400–999) CACS, ICA-verified significant stenosis was present in 8 % (1/13), 23 % (2/13), and 67 % (8/12), respectively. Among those with very high CACS (≥1000) (n = 10), 90 % of CCTAs were not evaluable for stenosis.

Conclusion

In asymptomatic elderly subjects with high pretest probability, CACS followed by CCTA may be considered for those with intermediate to high CACS.

     

Diagnostic and clinical benefit of combined coronary calcium and perfusion assessment in patients undergoing PET/CT myocardial perfusion stress imaging

Background  

A limitation of stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is the inability to detect non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). One advantage of MPI with a hybrid CT device is the ability to obtain same-setting measurement of the coronary artery calcium score (CACS).     

Diagnostic accuracy of low-dose 256-slice multi-detector coronary CT angiography using iterative reconstruction in patients with suspected coronary artery disease

Objectives

To evaluate the accuracy of low-dose coronary CTA with iterative reconstruction (IR) in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with suspected CAD.

Methods

Ninety-six patients with suspected CAD underwent low-dose prospective electrocardiogram-gated coronary CTA, with images reconstructed using IR. Image quality (IQ) of coronary segments were graded on a 4-point scale (4, excellent; 1, non-diagnostic). With invasive coronary angiography (ICA) considered the “gold standard”, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of coronary CTA were calculated on segment-, vessel- and patient-based levels. The patient data were divided into two groups (Agatston scores of ≥ 400 and <400). The differences in diagnostic performance between the two groups were tested.

Results

Diagnostic image quality was found in 98.1 % (1,232/1,256) of segments. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy were 90.8 %, 95.3 %, 81.8 %, 97.8 % and 94.3 % (segment-based) and 97.2 %, 83.3 %, 94.6 %, 90.9 % and 93.8 % (patient-based). Significant differences between the two groups were seen in specificity, PPV and accuracy (92.1 % vs. 97.9 %, 76.0 % vs. 86.7 %, 91.7 % vs. 96.6 %, P?<?0.05; segment-based). The average effective dose was 1.30?±?0.15 mSv.

Conclusion

Low-dose prospective coronary CTA with IR can acquire satisfactory image quality and show high diagnostic accuracy in patients with suspected CAD; however, blooming continues to pose a challenge in severely calcified segments.

Key Points

? Coronary artery disease (CAD) is increasingly investigated using coronary CTA. ? The iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithm is promising in decreasing radiation doses. ? Low-dose prospective coronary CTA with IR can acquire satisfactory image quality. ? Low-dose prospective coronary CTA with IR can show high diagnostic accuracy.     

Accuracy of low-dose rubidium-82 myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of coronary artery disease using 3D PET and normal database interpretation

Background

Our aim was to develop a normal database to be used for quantification of myocardial perfusion and diagnosis of ??obstructive coronary artery disease?? (CAD) using low-dose rubidium-82 three-dimensional (3D) positron emission tomography (PET)-CT.

Methods

From a record of 1,501 patients, 77 were identified as having low-likelihood (LLK) of CAD. Forty LLK patients were used to construct a normal database using 4DM-PET, the remainder used for validation of normalcy. A group of 70 patients with CAD who had invasive coronary angiography and PET-CT were used to evaluate the accuracy of the database for detecting CAD using the sum-stress-score. The effect of clinical exclusion criteria and the inclusion of LLK patients were evaluated.

Results

The normal database for CAD detection had a normalcy rate of 95%. Sensitivity was 100% for detecting patients with either 50% or 70% stenosis. Optimal specificity was 87% for either 50% or 70% stenosis. For localizing disease at 50% stenosis in the left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary artery, sensitivity ranged from 59% to 68%, while specificity was maintained at 87-89%. Similarly, at 70% stenosis, sensitivity ranged from 64% to 79%, and specificity from 87% to 91%.

Conclusions

A normal database containing the relative perfusion scores of patients with LLK of CAD can be used to accurately diagnose obstructive coronary disease using low-dose Rb-82 with 3D PET-CT imaging.