Phase I clinical trial of hepatic arterial infusion of paclitaxel in patients with advanced cancer and dominant liver involvement

Purpose  

The survival of patients with liver metastases from solid tumors is poor. We conducted a phase I study of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) paclitaxel in patients with advanced cancer and predominant liver involvement.     

Phase I trial of systemic oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy with hepatic arterial infusion in patients with unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of concurrent systemic oxaliplatin (Oxal) combinations plus hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) in patients with unresectable hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients (89% previously treated) with unresectable liver metastases were treated with concurrent HAI and systemic Oxal plus irinotecan (CPT-11; group A) or Oxal, fluorouracil (FU), and leucovorin (LV; group B). Systemic chemotherapy was administered every 2 weeks concurrent with 2 weeks of HAI floxuridine (FUDR) and dexamethasone (Dex) every 28 days. RESULTS: The MTD for patients in group A was Oxal 100 mg/m(2), CPT-11 150 mg/m(2), and FUDR 0.12 mg/kg x 30 mL divided by pump flow rate. The MTD for group B was Oxal 100 mg/m(2), LV 400 mg/m(2), and FU 1,400 mg/m(2) by continuous infusion over 48 hours, with the same FUDR dose as in group A. Grade 3 or 4 toxicities in groups A and B included diarrhea (24% and 20%), neutropenia (10% and 7%), neurotoxicity (24% and 20%), and bilirubin more than 3 mg/mL (5% and 7%, respectively). The complete and partial response rate totaled 90% for group A and 87% for group B. Median survival time was 36 and 22 months for groups A and B, respectively. Seven patients in group A were ultimately able to undergo liver resection. CONCLUSION: Combination therapy with HAI FUDR and Dex plus systemic Oxal combinations may be safely administered to patients with colorectal cancer. The high response rate (88%) and the possibility of conversion to resectability, despite disease progression on prior systemic regimens, suggest that these combinations should be evaluated in larger studies as first- or second-line therapy in patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.     

Phase I trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and docetaxel in advanced breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To develop a combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil; Alza Pharmaceuticals, Palo Alto, CA) and docetaxel (Taxotere; Aventis Pharmaceutical, Parsipanny, NJ) that can be safely used for the treatment of advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients with locally advanced (n = 10) or metastatic (n = 31) breast cancer received Doxil (30-, 40-, or 45-mg/m(2) intravenous [IV] infusion over 30 to 60 minutes), followed 1 hour later by docetaxel (60 or 75 mg/m(2) by IV infusion over 1 hour) in cohorts of three to six patients. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as febrile neutropenia, prolonged neutropenia, or grade 3 to 4 nonhematologic toxicity that occurred during cycle 1. RESULTS: In conjunction with docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) every 4 weeks, the MTD of Doxil was 30 mg/m(2) and required granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to prevent febrile neutropenia. Without G-CSF, the MTD was docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) and Doxil 30 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks; only 1 (7%) out of 15 patients treated at this dose level had cycle 1 DLT. Infusion reactions were common with Doxil with the recommended infusion schedule during the first cycle (55%) but were reduced with a modified schedule (7%). There was no clinically significant cardiac toxicity. Objective response occurred in eight of nine assessable patients with stage III disease and in 16 (52%) of 31 patients (95% confidence interval, 34% to 70%) with stage IV disease. CONCLUSION: The recommended dose and schedule of this combination for further evaluation is Doxil 30 mg/m(2) and docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) given every 3 weeks without G-CSF. When used with G-CSF, it is Doxil 30 mg/m(2) and docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) every 4 weeks.     

Phase I study of olaparib in combination with liposomal doxorubicin in patients with advanced solid tumours

Background:

Olaparib, an oral PARP inhibitor, has shown antitumour activity as monotherapy in patients with germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA)-mutated breast and ovarian cancer. This study evaluated olaparib capsules in combination with liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in patients with advanced solid tumours ({"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT00819221","term_id":"NCT00819221"}}NCT00819221).

Methods:

Patients received 28-day cycles of olaparib, continuously (days 1–28) or intermittently (days 1–7), plus PLD (40 mg m⁻², day 1); seven olaparib dose cohorts (50–400 mg bid) were explored to determine the recommended dose. Assessments included safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and preliminary efficacy (objective response rate (ORR)).

Results:

Of 44 patients treated (ovarian, n=28; breast, n=13; other/unknown, n=3), two experienced dose-limiting toxicities (grade 3 stomatitis and fatal pneumonia/pneumonitis (200 mg per 28-day cycle); grade 4 thrombocytopenia (400 mg per 7-day cycle)). The maximum tolerated dose was not reached using continuous olaparib 400 mg bid plus PLD. Grade ⩾3 and serious AEs were reported for 27 (61%) and 12 (27%) patients, respectively. No major pharmacokinetic interference was observed between olaparib and PLD. The ORR was 33% (n=14 out of 42; complete response, n=3). A total of 13 responders had ovarian cancer: 10 were platinum-sensitive, 11 had a gBRCA mutation.

Conclusions:

Continuous/intermittent olaparib (up to 400 mg bid) combined with PLD (40 mg m⁻²) was generally tolerated and showed evidence of antitumour activity in ovarian cancer.     

Phase I clinical trial of topotecan and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin

Background: The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of combination topotecan and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) administered in 4- or 3-week cycles in patients with advanced or refractory solid tumors. Patients and Methods: Patients were treated with intravenous topotecan (0.75-1.25 mg/m²) for 3 days followed by PLD (25-40 mg/m²) on Day 4. The following dose combinations (topotecan/PLD, mg/m²) were explored: 0.75/40, 1.0/40, and 1.25/40 every 28 days; and 1.0/25 and 1.0/30 every 21 days. Results: Thirty-two patients were enrolled, and all had received prior chemotherapy. Most (84 percent) patients had ovarian cancer. A total of 157 cycles (median, 4 cycles; range, 1-19 cycles) of chemotherapy were administered. Dose-limiting toxicities were Grade 4 neutropenia and death at dose level 3 (1.25/40 mg/m² every 28 days), and neutropenic fever, Grade 3 stomatitis, and Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy (all in one patient) at dose level 5 (1/30 mg/m² every 21 days). Myelosuppression was the most common serious toxicity. Twenty-six patients were evaluable for response and 7 (27 percent) had partial responses. All responses were seen in patients with ovarian cancer. Conclusions: This combination is feasible and well tolerated; encouraging activity was observed in heavily pretreated patients with ovarian cancer. The recommended regimens for a Phase II study are topotecan 1.0 mg/m² on Days 1-3 followed by PLD 40 mg/m² on Day 4 of a 28-day cycle, and topotecan 1.0 mg/m² on Days 1-3 and PLD 30 mg/m² on Day 4 of a 21-day cycle.     

Phase I trial of high-dose tamoxifen in combination with cisplatin in patients with lung cancer and other advanced malignancies

BACKGROUND: Tamoxifen has been reported to enhance the antitumor activity of cisplatin in preclinical models by modulation of protein kinase C signal transduction and apoptosis-related pathways. METHODS: We conducted a phase I study of high-dose oral tamoxifen in combination with intravenous cisplatin, with two objectives: 1) to determine tolerability, and 2) to determine the daily tamoxifen dose required to achieve serum levels equivalent to in vitro concentrations reported to enhance cisplatin cytotoxicity in preclinical models. Tamoxifen was administered days one through seven at escalating daily doses of 160 mg/m2 (n = 5), 200 mg/m2 (n = 6), and 250 mg/m2 (n = 4) by patient cohort, followed by cisplatin at 100 mg/m2 on day eight. Serum concentrations of tamoxifen and its hydroxylated metabolite N-desmethyltamoxifen were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) on day eight of the first treatment cycle in seven patients. RESULTS: Fifteen patients with advanced malignancies received treatment with tamoxifen at 160 mg/m2, 200 mg/m2, and 250 mg/m2 per cycle, respectively. Serum concentrations of tamoxifen and N-desmethyltamoxifen on day eight of the first cycle ranged from 1.75-8.22 microM (mean 4.72 microM) and 3.62-10.85 microM (mean 3.87 microM), respectively. Toxicity analysis demonstrated that grade 3/4 nonhematological toxicity occurred in 0/5 at a tamoxifen dose of 160 mg/m2, 1/6 at a tamoxifen dose of 200 mg/m2, and in 1/4 patients at the 250 mg/m2 dose level. No grade 4 hematological toxicity occurred. Classic dose-limiting toxicity was not observed; the trial was closed to further accrual after documentation that targeted tamoxifen levels (around 5 microM) were achieved with daily tamoxifen doses > or = 160 mg/m2 in combination with cisplatin. CONCLUSIONS: This regimen of high-dose tamoxifen in combination with cisplatin can be safely administered. Serum tamoxifen levels comparable to concentrations required for enhancement of cisplatin sensitivity in vitro are clinically achievable with acceptable toxicity. The level of antitumor activity in nonsmall cell lung cancer NSCLC is encouraging (partial response in 4/10 patients). Based on these data, a Phase II study of high-dose tamoxifen in combination with cisplatin in patients with metastatic NSCLC is being conducted through the Southwest Oncology Group.     

Phase II study of liposomal doxorubicin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer

Doxil is a liposomal preparation of doxorubicin that results in prolonged pharmacologic exposure in vivo to the active agent. We sought to test the hypothesis that this new formulation would result in improved efficacy in patients with colorectal cancer. Patients with advanced colorectal cancer who had received prior therapy were eligible for the trial. Treatment consisted of Doxil 45 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks. Seventeen patients entered the trial and they received a median of two cycles of treatment. None of the patients had a partial response to treatment. Stable disease was the best response, and one patient received therapy for 17 cycles before her disease progressed. The therapy was well tolerated, with only two patients having the dose decreased because of hand-foot syndrome. Four patients experienced allergic reactions during the infusion, but with appropriate premedication and slowing of the infusion, treatment was able to be resumed without difficulty. No greater than grade I neutropenia or thrombocytopenia developed in any patient. Although Doxil was well tolerated at this dose and schedule, it was not an active agent in this group of patients. Doxil alone or in combination with other agents is worthy of further study in cancers responsive to doxorubicin.     

A phase I study of hepatic arterial infusion of nab-paclitaxel in combination with intravenous gemcitabine and bevacizumab for patients with advanced cancers and predominant liver metastases

Purpose

We conducted a phase I clinical trial for patients with advanced cancer and predominant liver disease.

Methods

Patients were treated with HAI nab-paclitaxel (120–210 mg/m²; day 1); intravenous bevacizumab (10 mg/kg; day 1); and intravenous gemcitabine (600–800 mg/m²; days 1 and 8). A conventional “3 + 3” study design was used.

Results

Fifty patients with advanced cancer and predominant liver metastases were treated (median age, 58 years; 27 women, 23 men; median number of prior therapies, 3 [range 0–12]). The most common cancers were breast (n = 9) and pancreatic (n = 9). Overall, 264 cycles were administered (median/patient, 4; range 1–17). No dose-limiting toxicities were noted during the escalation phase. On dose level 4, 3 patients were unable to receive gemcitabine on day 8 because of severe thrombocytopenia. Dose level 3 was selected as the maximum-tolerated dose (HAI nab-paclitaxel 180 mg/m² and intravenous gemcitabine 800 mg/m² and bevacizumab 10 mg/kg); 32 patients were treated in the expansion phase. The most common treatment-related toxicities were thrombocytopenia (n = 17), neutropenia (n = 10), and fatigue (n = 12). Of 46 patients evaluable for response, 9 (20 %) had a partial response (PR) and 9 (20 %) had stable disease for ≥6 months. The median overall survival duration was 7.0 months (95 % CI: 4, 22 months), and the median progression-free survival duration was 4.2 months (95 % CI: 2.7, 8.6 months).

Conclusions

HAI nab-paclitaxel in combination with gemcitabine and bevacizumab was well tolerated and had antitumor activity in selected patients with advanced cancer and liver metastases.     

Phase I study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and gemcitabine in patients with advanced malignancies

BACKGROUND: Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PEG-LD) and gemcitabine have single-agent activity in breast and ovarian carcinoma patients. We conducted a Phase I trial to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicities of this combination in patients with advanced malignancies. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with refractory or recurrent malignancies were enrolled in this dose escalation trial. Dose escalation proceeded from a starting level of PEG-LD 20 mg/m(2) and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) administered on Days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. RESULTS: The MTD was PEG-LD 20 mg/m(2) and gemcitabine 2000 mg/m(2) administered on Days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Dose-limiting toxicity, a Grade 3 rash, was observed in one patient during Cycle 1 and Grade 3 stomatitis and a rash were observed in a second patient during Cycle 2 after administration of PEG-LD 25 mg/m(2) and gemcitabine 2000 mg/m(2). Other side effects included palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, nausea, and fatigue. One complete and two partial responses were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended Phase II dose is PEG-LD 20 mg/m(2) with gemcitabine 2000 mg/m(2) on Days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. A trial with this combination is currently ongoing at this institution comprising patients with refractory ovarian carcinoma.     

Phase I study of combination chemotherapy using sorafenib and transcatheter arterial infusion with cisplatin for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

The aims of this study were to evaluate the frequency of dose‐limiting toxicities and to find the recommended dose of combination chemotherapy with sorafenib and transcatheter arterial infusion (TAI) using cisplatin for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), for whom surgical resection, local ablation therapy, or transcatheter arterial chemoembolization were not indicated. Patients received 800 mg sorafenib daily. Cisplatin was given at one of three dosages (level 1, 35 mg/m²/cycle; level 2, 50 mg/m²/cycle; and level 3, 65 mg/m²/cycle) from feeding arteries to the HCC. The treatment was repeated every 4–6 weeks up to a maximum of six cycles, until there were signs of tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity. The dose‐limiting toxicities experienced by the 20 enrolled patients were grade 4 increased aspartate aminotransferase at level 1, grade 3 gastrointestinal hemorrhaging at level 1, and grade 3 hypertension at level 3. The common drug‐related adverse events that were of severity grade 3 or 4 included the elevation of aspartate aminotransferase (30%), alanine aminotransferase (20%), amylase (30%), and lipase (30%). Partial response was seen in four patients (20%), and 13 patients (65%) had stable disease. The median overall survival and progression‐free survival were 9.1 and 3.3 months, respectively. The combination of sorafenib at 800 mg/day with TAI of cisplatin at 65 mg/m²/cycle was determined to be the recommended regimen. A randomized phase II trial of sorafenib alone versus sorafenib plus TAI of cisplatin is currently underway. This study was registered at UMIN as trial number UMIN000001496.     

Phase I trial of intravenous thymidine and carboplatin in patients with advanced cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the biologic interactions and toxicities of carboplatin combined with a 24-hour infusion of thymidine 75 mg/m(2) in a phase I trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients with cancer refractory to conventional therapy were treated. The first set of patients (n = 7) received thymidine alone 4 weeks before subsequent planned courses of thymidine combined with carboplatin followed (4 weeks) by carboplatin alone. Carboplatin was administered over 20 minutes at hour 20 of the 24-hour thymidine infusion. The carboplatin dose was escalated in patient groups: 200 mg/m(2) (n = 3); 300 mg/m(2) (n = 7); 350 mg/m(2) (n = 4); 400 mg/m(2) (n = 3); 480 mg/m(2) (n = 10); and 576 mg/m(2) (n = 5). At the maximum-tolerated dose (480 mg/m(2)), five patients received combined therapy first and carboplatin alone second, and five patients received carboplatin first and combined therapy second. Maintenance therapy for stable or responding patients was combined therapy. RESULTS: Evaluation demonstrated a trend toward thymidine protection of carboplatin-induced treatment-limiting thrombocytopenia. Neutropenia with carboplatin alone or in combination was negligible. Thymidine alone had no myelosuppressive effects and produced reversible grade 1 or 2 nausea and vomiting (57%), headache (25%), and grade 1 neurotoxicity (22%). Thymidine did not enhance expected carboplatin toxicities. There was no therapy-related infection or bleeding. Analysis of platinum in plasma ultrafiltrate and urine showed no effect by thymidine. Similarly, thymidine pharmacokinetics was not affected by carboplatin. As predicted, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide levels in peripheral lymphocytes were increased during exposure to carboplatin and/or thymidine but were decreased by carboplatin alone. In three patients with high-grade glioma, responses included one complete remission (21 months) and one partial remission (14 months) at the 480-mg/m(2)-dose level, and disease stabilization (7 months) at the 400-mg/m(2-dose) level. A minor response was observed in a patient with metastatic colon cancer (5 months) at the 480-mg/m(2)-dose level. CONCLUSION: The combination of carboplatin and thymidine as described is well tolerated. The data presented have resulted in a phase II study by the North American Brain Tumor Consortium.     

Phase I study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx) in combination with carboplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose of the combination of Carboplatin and Caelyx, a pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, with promising activities in various solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients with various advanced solid tumors were included. Three dose levels of Caelyx were explored: 30, 35 and 40 mg/m2 in association with a fixed dose of Carboplatin (AUC 5) every 3 weeks. Dose escalation followed a modified continuous reassessment method. RESULTS: Dose-limiting toxicities were almost exclusively hematological: 3 febrile neutropenia, 1 grade 4 neutropenia lasting more than 7 days and 2 grade 4 thrombopenia were observed. Grade 4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were observed in 20 and 10% of courses, respectively. The median interval between courses was 25 days after cycle 1 and 27-28 days after subsequent cycles. Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, mucositis and other non hematological toxicities were mild and uncommon. One patient experienced a severe anaphylactic reaction immediately after Caelyx infusion. No clinical heart dysfunction was observed. Three patients responded to therapy including 2 clinical complete responses in relapsing ovarian cancer. CONCLUSION: The recommended dose for future studies is Caelyx 35 mg/m2 + Carboplatin AUC 5 every 3 or 4 weeks. Antitumor activity, especially in ovarian cancer, warrants further investigation in phase II studies.     

A phase I pharmacodynamic trial of bortezomib in combination with doxorubicin in patients with advanced cancer

Purpose  This phase I trial sought to define the toxicity, maximally tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacodynamics of a combination of bortezomib and doxorubicin in patients with advanced malignancies. Patients and methods  Twenty-six patients were treated with bortezomib intravenously on days 1, 4, 8 and 11, with doxorubicin also administered intravenously on days 1 and 8, both in a 21-day cycle. Dosing ranged from 1.0 mg/m² of bortezomib with 15 mg/m² of doxorubicin to 1.5 mg/m² of bortezomib with 20 mg/m² of doxorubicin. Pharmacodynamic studies performed included assessment of levels of 20S proteasome activity and ubiquitin-protein conjugates. Results  The combination of bortezomib and doxorubicin was generally well tolerated. There were two dose limiting toxicities (DLT) at dose cohort 3 (1.3 mg/m² bortezomib, 20 mg/m² doxorubicin) and 2 DLT at dose cohort 3a (1.5 mg/m² bortezomib, 15 mg/m² doxorubicin). DLT seen included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and neuropathy. In addition, one patient developed grade 3 central nervous system toxicity in cycle 2 (not a DLT). One patient with hormone refractory prostate cancer had a partial response. Proteasome inhibition in whole blood was demonstrated and an increase in ubiquitin-protein conjugates was observed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of most patients. Conclusions  Bortezomib and doxorubicin can be administered safely. The recommended phase II dose for this 21-day cycle is bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² intravenously on days 1, 4, 8 and 11, and doxorubicin 20 mg/m² intravenously on days 1 and 8. This combination may be of special interest in multiple myeloma, given the activity of both drugs in that disease. Supported by grant: U01 CA062491 “Early Clinical Trials of Anti-Cancer Agents With Phase I Emphasis, NCI” and M01 RR03186 “General Clinical Research Center Program of The National Center for Research Resources, NIH”.     

Phase I study of weekly docetaxel and liposomal doxorubicin in patients with advanced solid tumors

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated doses (MTDs) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the weekly administration of docetaxel and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PEG-LD) in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients with solid tumors were enrolled in the study. Dose escalations of both drugs were given on a weekly basis for 3 consecutive weeks in cycles of 4 weeks. The starting dose for docetaxel was 20 mg/m(2)/week and for PEG-LD 6 mg/m(2)/week. RESULTS: The MTD was 35 mg/m(2)/week for docetaxel and 14 mg/m(2)/week for PEG-LD. The DLTs at this level were grade 3 diarrhea (n=1 patient) and grade 3 mucositis (n=2 patients). There was no grade 4 hematologic or non-hematologic toxicity. Grade 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred only in 1 and 2 patients, respectively. The non-hematologic toxicity was also mild with grade 2/3 fatigue in 8 patients, grade 2/3 neurotoxicity in 4, grade 2/3 mucositis in 8, grade 2/3 diarrhea in 4 and grade 2/3 nausea and vomiting in 5 patients. Two (5.7%) complete and 6 (17%) partial responses (overall response rate=22.7%; 95% confidence interval 9.6--32.4%) were observed among 35 evaluable patients. In 12 (63%) of 19 patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer, a decline in serum levels of prostate-specific antigen of >50% was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The weekly administration of docetaxel with PEG-LD is a well-tolerated regimen that merits further evaluation.     

Phase I study of weekly paclitaxel and liposomal doxorubicin in patients with advanced solid tumours

The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) of a weekly administration of paclitaxel and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx; Schering Plough Pharmaceutical) in patients with advanced solid tumours. 19 pretreated patients with solid tumours received escalated doses of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (6-12 mg/m(2)) as a 1-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion followed by a fixed dose of paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) weekly for 4 consecutive weeks in cycles of 6 weeks. DLT was defined as grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia, febrile neutropenia, grades 3 or 4 non-haematological toxicity or treatment delay due to unresolved toxicity during cycle 1. The MTD was reached at the dose of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin of 10 mg/m(2)/week and paclitaxel of 80 mg/m(2)/week. The DLTs were treatment delay due to grade 3 neutropenia and grade 3 diarrhoea. A total of 55 chemotherapy cycles were administered, and grades 3-4 neutropenia occurred in seven cycles (13%); the non-haematological toxicity was mild with grades 2/3 diarrhoea occurring in 4 (7%), grades 2-4 asthenia in 11 (20%) and grade 2 mucositis in 7 (13%) cycles. There was no case with more than a 10% LVEF decrease after a median of 3 (range 2-6) administered cycles/patients. One patient with breast cancer and 1 with ovarian cancer experienced a major partial response. The weekly administration of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin at the dose of 10 mg/m(2) in combination with paclitaxel at the dose of 80 mg/m(2) for 4 consecutive weeks, in cycles of 6 weeks which represent the recommended doses for further phase II studies, is a well tolerated regimen, which merits further evaluation in tumours known to be sensitive to taxanes and/or anthracyclines.     

Age-stratified phase I trial of a combination of bortezomib,gemcitabine, and liposomal doxorubicin in patients with advanced malignancies

Background  

Preclinical data suggest synergistic activity of bortezomib, gemcitabine, and liposomal doxorubicin. Because tolerance to therapy may be attenuated in elderly patients, we performed an age-stratified phase I trial of this combination.     

Phase I clinical trial of continuous infusion of tyroserleutide in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is usually diagnosed in advanced stage, which causes difficulty of using surgical treatment. Previous studies demonstrated that tyroserleutide (YSL), an immunologically active tripeptide compound, could suppress the proliferation and tumor formation of some liver cancer cell lines. We aimed to investigate the feasibility and toxicity of continuous administration of YSL by a portable infusion pump to patients with advanced HCC and its biologically effective but non-toxic doses used in outpatient setting. Forty patients (12 in stage 1, 28 in stage 2, total 10 treated in each dose cohort) were treated with YSL 6, 12, 18, or 24 mg/day lasting for 5 days. No treatment-related mortality was observed. The overall response rates were 25% (3/12) and 7.2% (2/28) in stages 1 and 2, respectively. The median 6-month overall survival (OS) in stage 1 was 75, 64, and 41 days for 6, 18, and 24 mg/day groups, respectively; all patients survived in the 12 mg/day group. The median OS in stage 2 was 68, 72, and 60 days for 12, 18, and 24 mg/day groups, respectively; all survived in the 6 mg/day group. The most common adverse reactions were abnormal liver function (59/107) and hemogram (22/107). The dose-limiting toxicities of 24 mg/day group contained abdominal distention (1/10), sicchasia (1/10), hyponatremia (1/10), myocardiac ischemia (1/10), and abnormal hemogram (6/10). We conclude that the continuous administration of YSL by portable infusion pump was well tolerated. Treatment responses of doses 6 and 12 mg/day were better than other two groups. Further studies of continuous infusion of YSL to determine its efficacy are warranted.     

Phase I trial of liposomal encapsulated doxorubicin (Myocet; D-99) and weekly docetaxel in advanced breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a phase I trial to determine the safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of non-pegylated liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin (Myocet; D-99) administered with weekly docetaxel in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients with no prior chemotherapy for MBC received D-99 (60 or 50 mg/m2) intravenously (i.v.) on day 1 and escalating doses of docetaxel (25, 30 and 35 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1 and 8 in cohorts of three to six patients. Treatment cycles were repeated every 21 days for a maximum of six cycles. RESULTS: The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 50 mg/m2 of D-99 in combination with 25 mg/m2 of weekly docetaxel. The most common grade 4 toxicity was neutropenia that occurred in 42 (41%) of treatment cycles, with 10 hospitalizations for febrile neutropenia. Serious protocol-defined cardiac events occurred in three (14%) patients, with two (10%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1% to 30%) developing congestive heart failure (CHF) after a total cumulative anthracycline dose (adjuvant doxorubicin + D-99) of 540 mg/m2. CONCLUSIONS: D-99 in combination with weekly docetaxel, at the doses and schedule as administered in this trial, is not recommended for phase II testing. Additional trials, using different doses and schedules, are required to evaluate the potential side-effects and efficacy of D-99 and docetaxel.