Pectoralis major tendon rupture: A biomechanical analysis of repair techniques

Rupture of the insertion of the pectoralis major muscle to the proximal humerus is becoming a common injury. Repair of these ruptures increases patient satisfaction, strength, and cosmesis, and shortens return to competitive sports. Several repair techniques have been described, but recently many surgeons are using suture anchors. The traditional repair technique uses transosseous sutures, but no study has biomechanically compared the strength of these two repair techniques in human cadavers. Twelve fresh‐frozen human shoulder specimens were dissected. The pectoralis major tendon insertion was cut from the bone and repaired using one of the two repair techniques: specimens were randomly assigned to transosseous trough with suture tied over bone versus four suture anchors. The fixation constructs were pulled to failure at 4 mm/s on a materials testing system. The mean ultimate failure load of the transosseous repairs was 611 N and the mean ultimate failure load of the suture anchor repair was 620 N. The mean stiffness of the transosseous repair was 32 and 28 N/mm for the suture anchor group. We found no statistically significant difference between these two repair techniques. © 2011 Orthopaedic Research Society Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 29:1783–1787, 2011     

Primary fixation strength of rotator cuff repair techniques: a comparative study

Purpose:The goal of the study was to compare the primary fixation strength of transosseous suture, suture anchor, and hybrid repair techniques for rotator cuff repair.Type of Study:Animal model experiment.Methods:Thirty-two sheep shoulders were divided into 4 homogeneous groups, according to bone density and tendon dimensions. Infraspinatus tendons were transected from their insertions and reattached using 4 different techniques. Group 1 was repaired with a single Mason-Allen stitch and 2 transosseous tunnels for each end of the suture, knotted on the lateral cortex of proximal humerus; group 2 was repaired with double Mason-Allen stitches and 2 transosseous tunnels; group 3 was repaired with 2 Corkscrews (Arthrex, Germany); and group 4 was repaired with 2 Corkscrews combined with a single Mason-Allen transosseous suture. All specimens were tested for their fixation strengths with a material testing system.Results:The mode of failure in group 1 was mainly suture breakage. In groups 3 and 4, the tendons pulled out from the sutures. In group 2, sutures broke the bony bridge between the 2 tunnels. The mean load to failure value was 160.31 ± 34.59 N in group 1, 199.36 ± 11.73 N in group 2, 108.32 ± 15.98 N in group 3, and 214.24 ± 28.52 N in group 4. Anchor fixation was significantly weaker compared with other groups (P <.001). Combination of a transosseous suture and anchor fixation (group 4) was significantly stronger than the single transosseous suture (group 1) and double anchor techniques (group 3) (P <.001).Conclusions:Hybrid technique was the strongest among the tested rotator cuff repair techniques. With the addition of one transosseous suture to two anchors, the strength of the repair could be doubled.     

Rotator cuff repair: the effect of double-row fixation on three-dimensional repair site

There is a high rate of recurrent and residual tears after rotator cuff repair surgery. Recent cadaveric studies have provided surgeons with new knowledge about the anatomy of the supraspinatus tendon insertion. Traditional repair techniques fail to reproduce the area of the supraspinatus insertion, or footprint, on the greater tuberosity anatomically. Double-row suture anchor (DRSA) fixation is a new technique that has been developed to restore the supraspinatus footprint better. In this study, 3-dimensional mapping was used to determine the area of the footprint recreated with 3 different repair methods: a transosseous simple suture technique, fixation with a single row of suture anchors, and DRSA fixation. The DRSA fixation technique consistently reproduced 100% of the original supraspinatus footprint, whereas the single-row suture anchor fixation and transosseous simple suture techniques reproduced only 46% and 71% of the insertion site, respectively. Therefore, the footprint area of the DRSA fixation technique was significantly larger (P < .05) than that of the other 2 techniques. Furthermore, double-row fixation may provide a tendon-bone interface better suited for biologic healing and restoring normal anatomy.     

Über die Primärfestigkeit konventioneller und alternativer Nahttechniken der RotatorenmanschetteEine biomechanische Untersuchung

The aim of this biomechanical study was to evaluate rotator cuff repair strength using different suture anchor techniques compared to conventional repair, taking into consideration the native strength of the supraspinatus tendon. Therefore, a defined defect of the supraspinatus was created in 50 freshly frozen cadaver specimen (group size n = 10; median age at death: 56 years). Five methods were employed for cuff repair: standard transosseous suture, modified transosseous suture with patch augmentation and three suture anchors (Acufex Wedge TAG, Acufex Rod TAG und Mitek GII). The maximum tensile load of the five techniques was: standard transosseous suture, 410 N; modified transosseous suture, 552 N; Wedge TAG, 207 N; Rod TAG, 217 N; Mitek GII, 186 N. The difference between the suture anchor and standard techniques were highly significant (P < 0.001). In this series, the Mitek Gll anchor showed the lowest anchor dislocation rate at 3% (n = 1). The Wedge TAG system had a dislocation rate of 27% (n = 8) and the Rod TAG system 43% (n = 13). Suture anchor techniques revealed about 20%, the standard technique 34% and its modification 60% of the hypothetically calculated native tendon strength. Compared to conventional transosseous suture techniques, the use of the suture anchors tested in this series does not significantly increase the primary fixation strength of rotator cuff repair. The metallic implant with two barbs (Mitek GII) seems to be superior to the polyacetal anchors when inserted into the spongiform bone of the greater tubercle. The considerably weaker repair strength needs to be taken into consideration in postoperative patient rehabilitation, especially after the use of suture anchors.     

Button Fixation Technique for Achilles Tendon Reinsertion: A Biomechanical Study

Chronic insertional tendinopathy of the Achilles tendon is a frequent and disabling pathologic entity. Operative treatment is indicated for patients for whom nonoperative management has failed. The treatment can consist of the complete detachment of the tendon insertion and extensive debridement. We biomechanically tested a new operative technique that uses buttons for fixation of the Achilles tendon insertion on the posterior calcaneal tuberosity and compared it with 2 standard bone anchor techniques. A total of 40 fresh-frozen cadaver specimens were used to compare 3 fixation techniques for reinserting the Achilles tendon: single row anchors, double row anchors, and buttons. The ultimate loads and failure mechanisms were recorded. The button assembly (median load 764 N, range 713 to 888) yielded a median fixation strength equal to 202% (range 137% to 251%) of that obtained with the double row anchors (median load 412 N, range 301 to 571) and 255% (range 213% to 317%) of that obtained with the single row anchors (median load 338 N, range 241 to 433N). The most common failure mechanisms were suture breakage with the buttons (55%) and pull out of the implant with the double row (70%) and single row (85%) anchors. The results of the present biomechanical cadaver study have shown that Achilles tendon reinsertion fixation using the button technique provides superior pull out strength than the bone anchors tested.     

Comparison of pullout button versus suture anchor for zone I flexor tendon repair

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcome after repair of zone I flexor tendon injuries using either the pullout button technique or suture anchors placed in the distal phalanx. METHODS: Between 1998 and 2002 we treated 26 consecutive zone I flexor tendon injuries. Thirteen patients had repairs from 1998 to 2000 using a modified pullout button technique (group A) and 13 patients had repair using suture anchors placed in the distal phalanx (group B). Patient characteristics were similar for both groups. The same postoperative flexor tendon rehabilitation protocol and follow-up schedule were used for both groups. Evaluation included range of motion, sensibility and grip strength, failure, complications, and return to work. The Student t test was used to determine significant differences. RESULTS: All patients completed 1 year of follow-up evaluation. There were 2 infections in group A that resolved with oral antibiotics and no infections in group B. There were no tendon repair failures and no repeat surgeries in either group. At final follow-up evaluation there were no statistically significant differences for the following end points: sensibility (Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing and 2-point discrimination), active range of motion (at the proximal interphalangeal joint, distal interphalangeal joint, or their combined motion), flexion contracture (at the proximal interphalangeal joint, distal interphalangeal joint, or their combined contracture), and grip strength (injured tendon as a percent of the contralateral uninjured tendon). The suture anchor group had a statistically significant improvement for time to return to work. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the clinical outcome after flexor tendon repair using either suture anchors or the pullout button technique. A significant improvement was found for time to return to work for repairs using the suture anchor technique. Flexor tendon repair can be achieved using suture anchors placed in the distal phalanx, thereby avoiding the potential morbidity associated with the pullout button technique. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, Level III.     

Knotless anatomic double-layer double-row rotator cuff repair: a novel technique re-establishing footprint and shape of full-thickness tears

The standard technique for restoring footprint after full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff includes double-row or transosseous-equivalent techniques. However, the anatomically typical bird’s beak shape and profile of tendon insertion may not be originally restored and biomechanics may be altered. In this report, the authors describe a technique that involves creating two intratendinous stitches at different levels of the torn tendon. The first passes through the bursal-side layer, the second stitch through the joint-side layer. Both stitches may be performed in mattress suture configuration. The anchorage is performed by knotless anchors in order to avoid knots lying within the insertion area. The footprint is restored first medially then laterally by the use of double-row principles. The joint-side suture is anchored within the medially placed anchor. The bursal-side suture is anchored by a laterally placed anchor. The anatomic insertion and restoration of the shape and profile may be enabled by the described double-layer suture technique. Using a double-layer double-row repair may potentially improve functional results of rotator cuff repair constructs.     

Insertion anatomy of the pectoralis major tendon

BackgroundPectoralis major tendon tears are encountered in young active patients.MethodsIn 10 fresh cadaveric shoulders we measured-1. Proximal to distal insertion width of the pectoralis major tendon.2. The distance of the superior border of the tendon from the supero-medial tip of the greater tuberosity (GT).ResultsThe average insertion width was 46 mm. The average distance between the superior border of the tendon and the tip of the GT was 48.5 mm.ConclusionThe superior border of the tendon should be repaired with two anchors at a distance of 48.5 mm from the tip of the GT so as to cover a width of 46 mm.     

Transosseous tunnels versus suture anchors for the repair of acute quadriceps and patellar tendon ruptures: A systematic review and meta-analysis of biomechanical studies

BackgroundMultiple techniques have been developed for the repair of acute quadriceps and patellar tendon ruptures with the goal of optimizing clinical outcomes while minimizing complications and costs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical properties of transosseous tunnels and suture anchors for the repair of quadriceps and patellar tendon ruptures.MethodsA systematic review of the PubMed and Embase databases was performed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using specific search terms and eligibility criteria. Meta-analysis was performed by fixed-effects models for studies of low heterogeneity (I² <25%) and random-effects models for studies of moderate to high heterogeneity (I² ≥25%).ResultsA total of 392 studies were identified from the initial literature search with 7 studies meeting the eligibility criteria for quadriceps tendon repair and 8 studies meeting the eligibility criteria for patellar tendon repair. Based on the random-effects model for total gap formation and load to failure for quadriceps tendon repair, the mean difference was 8.88 mm (95% CI, −8.31 mm to 26.06 mm; p = 0.31) in favor of a larger gap with transosseous tunnels and −117.25N (95%CI, −242.73N to 8.23N; p = 0.07) in favor of a larger load to failure with suture anchors. A similar analysis for patellar tendon repair demonstrated a mean difference of 2.86 mm (95% CI, 1.08 mm to 4.64 mm; p = 0.002) in favor of a larger gap with transosseous tunnels and −56.34N (95% CI, −226.75 to 114.07N; p = 0.52) in favor of a larger load to failure with suture anchor repair.ConclusionsTransosseous tunnels are biomechanically similar to suture anchors for quadriceps tendon repair. Patellar tendon repair may benefit from reduced gap formation after cycling with suture anchor repair, but the load to failure for both techniques is biomechanically similar. Additional studies are necessary to evaluate these and alternative repair techniques.Level of evidenceSystematic review and meta-analysis of biomechanical studies, Level V.     

Anatomic Reduction and Next-Generation Fixation Constructs for Arthroscopic Repair of Crescent,L-Shaped,and U-Shaped Rotator Cuff Tears

Emerging techniques and instrumentation have allowed orthopaedic surgeons to achieve rotator cuff repair through an all-arthroscopic technique. The most critical steps in rotator cuff repair consist of proper identification of the cuff tear pattern and anatomic restoration of the torn tendon footprint. With anatomic reduction of the rotator cuff tendons, a sound fixation construct can help restore rotator cuff contact pressure and kinematics, allowing for decreased repair tension and optimal healing potential. We provide surgical methods to recognize tear patterns and present a repair construct that will restore the anatomic footprint of the torn rotator cuff tendon. The key, initial maneuver to restore the anatomic footprint of the cuff includes placement of a suture anchor at the anterolateral corner for L-shaped tears and at the posterolateral corner for reverse L–shaped and U-shaped tears. After insertion of the medial-row anchors, the tendon stitches should be planned by use of a grasper to hold the tendon in a reduced position and guide location of the stitch. The lateral row with suture bridge can be visualized, and the final repair construct should produce an anatomic restoration of the rotator cuff footprint.     

Midterm clinical outcomes following arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair

Purpose:Arthroscopic transosseous (TO) rotator cuff repair has recently emerged as a new option for surgical treatment of symptomatic rotator cuff tears. Limited data is available regarding outcomes using this technique. This study evaluated midterm clinical outcomes following a novel arthroscopic TO (anchorless) rotator cuff repair technique.Results:Statistically significant improvements were noted in forward flexion, external rotation and internal rotation (P < 0.0001). Average postoperative subjective shoulder value was 93.7, simple shoulder test 11.6, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score 94.6. According to ASES scores, results for the 109 shoulders available for final follow-up were excellent in 95 (87.1%), good in 8 (7.3%), fair in 3 (2.8%), and poor in 3 (2.8%). There was no difference in ROM or outcome scores in patients who underwent a concomitant biceps procedure (tenodesis or tenotomy) compared with those who did not. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in outcome between patients who underwent either biceps tenodesis or tenotomy. Age, history of injury preceding the onset of pain, tear size, number of TO tunnels required to perform the repair, and presence of fatty infiltration did not correlate with postoperative ROM or subjective outcome measures at final follow-up. Two complications and four failures were noted.Conclusions:Arthroscopic TO rotator cuff repair technique leads to statistically significant midterm improvement in ROM and satisfactory midterm subjective outcome scores with low complication/failure rates in patients with average medium-sized rotator cuff tears with minimal fatty infiltration. Further work is required to evaluate radiographic healing rates with this technique and to compare outcomes following suture anchor repair.

Level of Evidence:

Level IV     

Evaluation of a New Knotless Suture Anchor Repair in Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures: A Biomechanical Comparison of Three Techniques

Acute ruptures of the Achilles tendon are a common injury, and debate has continued in published studies on how best to treat these injuries. Specifically, controversy exists regarding the surgical approaches for Achilles tendon repair when one considers percutaneous versus open repair. The present study investigated the biomechanical strength of 3 different techniques for Achilles tendon repair in a cadaveric model. A total of 36 specimens were divided into 3 groups, each of which received a different construct. The first group received a traditional Krackow suture repair, the second group was repaired using a jig-assisted percutaneous suture, and the third group received a repair using a jig-assisted percutaneous repair modified with suture anchors placed into the calcaneus. The specimens were tested with cyclical loading and to ultimate failure. Cyclical loading showed a trend toward a stronger repair with the use of suture anchors after 10 cycles (p = .295), 500 cycles (p = .120), and 1000 cycles (p = .040). The ultimate load to failure was greatest in the group repaired with the modified knotless technique using the suture anchors (p = .098). The results of the present study show a clear trend toward a stronger construct in Achilles repair using a knotless suture anchor technique, which might translate to a faster return to activity and be more resistant to an early and aggressive rehabilitation protocol. Further clinical studies are warranted to evaluate this technique in a patient population.     

Suture anchor repair of quadriceps tendon rupture after total knee arthroplasty

Disruption of the extensor mechanism after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a devastating complication, usually requiring surgical repair. Although suture anchor fixation is well described for repair of the ruptured native knee quadriceps tendon, no study has discussed the use of suture anchors in quadriceps repair after TKA. We present an illustrative case of successful suture anchor fixation of the quadriceps mechanism after TKA. The procedure has been performed in a total of 3 patients. A surgical technique and brief review of the literature follows. Suture anchor fixation of the quadriceps tendon is a viable option in the setting of rupture after TKA.     

Reattachment of the distal tendon of biceps: factors affecting the failure strength of the repair

Operative fixation is the treatment of choice for a rupture of the distal tendon of biceps. A variety of techniques have been described including transosseous sutures and suture anchors. The poor quality of the bone of the radial tuberosity might affect the load to failure of the tendon repair in early rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to determine the loads to failure of different techniques of fixation and to investigate their association with the bone mineral density of the radial tuberosity. Peripheral quantitative computed tomography was carried out to measure the trabecular and cortical bone mineral density of the radial tuberosity in 40 cadaver specimens. The loads to failure in four different techniques of fixation were determined. The Endobutton-based method showed the highest failure load at 270 N (sd 22) (p < 0.05). The mean failure load of the transosseous suture technique was 210 N (sd 66) and that of the TwinFix-QuickT 5.0 mm was 57 N (sd 22), significantly lower than those of all other repairs (p < 0.05). No significant correlation was seen between bone mineral density and loads to failure. The transosseous technique is an easy and cost-saving procedure for fixation of the distal biceps tendon. TwinFix-QuickT 5.0 mm had significantly lower failure loads, which might affect early rehabilitation, particularly in older patients.     

The kringle suture: maximizing tendon repair stability while limiting hardware utilization—description of the technique and preliminary results

Background

Arthroscopic repair currently represents the gold standard surgical treatment for rotator cuff tears, despite several aspects that are still matter of discussion between surgeons, and it is not clear yet what technique is better with respect to the others. Several evidences, however, support the assumption that the suture configuration is most important than the number of suture anchors used.

Materials and methods

In this work, we describe a new suture technique for arthroscopic supraspinatus tendon repair using a single double-loaded common suture anchor, and based on a continue and multi-passage suture configuration, with final gross resemblance to the nordic kringle pastries or to the kringle protein domain. Between June 2015 and July 2016, 44 patients (44 shoulders) were treated for supraspinatus tendon tear by means of the kringle suture. Of these, 36 patients have been evaluated from the clinical and radiographic site in the setting of this study, with a follow-up time ranging from 18 to 30 months.

Results

During the follow-up period, no major complications were recorded. Two patients reported a transient postoperative stiffness, which completely resolved upon 6 months from surgery. All of the patients referred complete subjective satisfaction and return to their daylife activities without pain. No sign of radiographic subsidence of the suture anchors was found at the radiographic analysis.

Conclusion

The kringle suture technique is cost saving, easy to perform, versatile and provides excellent initial fixation strength as required for tendon to bone healing of the reinserted cuff.

     

TWINFIX TI QUICK-T锚钉治疗跟腱止点撕脱的临床研究

目的应用TWINFIX TI QUICK-T治疗跟腱止点撕脱伤,评价其疗效,为临床治疗提供参考。方法 2007年9月至2010年5月采用TWINFIX TI QUICK-T锚钉治疗跟腱止点撕脱伤16例,男10例,女6例;平均44.7岁。左侧7例,右侧9例。按AOFAS踝与后足功能评分标准评价疗效。结果随访6～24个月,平均13个月。术后无一例出现缝线裂开、切口感染、主要血管及神经损伤、内固定失效等并发症,术后恢复正常解剖关系及外观,踝关节功能恢复满意。本组16例,优12例,良2例,可2例,优良率87.5%。结论利用TWINFIX TI QUICK-T锚钉治疗跟腱止点撕脱是一种合理有效的方法,这种技术不仅能有效地对抗小腿三头肌的牵拉,还有利于术后踝关节早期功能锻炼及更好地恢复功能。     

Part I: Footprint contact characteristics for a transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair technique compared with a double-row repair technique

Rotator cuff repair via transosseous tunnels can improve footprint contact area and pressure when compared with suture anchor techniques. A double-row technique has been used clinically to improve footprint coverage by a repaired tendon. We hypothesized that a transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair via tendon suture bridges would demonstrate improved pressurized contact between the tendon and tuberosity when compared with a double-row technique. In 6 fresh-frozen human shoulders, a transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair was performed: a suture limb from each of 2 medial anchors was bridged over the tendon and fixed laterally with an interference screw (4 suture bridges). In 6 of the contralateral specimens, two types of repair were performed randomly in each specimen: (1) a double-row repair and (2) a transosseous-equivalent repair with a single screw (2 suture bridges). For all repairs, pressure-sensitive film was placed at the tendon-footprint interface, and software was used to obtain measurements. The mean pressurized contact area between the tendon and insertion was significantly greater for the 4-suture bridge technique (124.2 +/- 16.3 mm2, 77.6% footprint) compared with both the double-row (63.3 +/- 28.5 mm2, 39.6% footprint) and 2-suture bridge (99.7 +/- 22.0 mm2, 62.3% footprint) techniques (P < .05). The mean interface pressure exerted over the footprint by the tendon was greater for the 4-suture bridge technique (0.27 +/- 0.04 MPa) than for the double-row technique (0.19 +/- 0.01 MPa) (P = .002). The transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair technique can improve pressurized contact area and mean pressure between the tendon and footprint when compared with a double-row technique. A transosseous-equivalent technique, using suture bridges, may help optimize the healing biology at a repaired rotator cuff insertion.     

Arthroscopic Bankart revision using all suture anchor in recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation: A case report

IntroductionArthroscopic Bankart revision after recurrent shoulder dislocation is still a matter of discussion. Several factors are contributing to this injury. Recently the development of all suture anchors has grown in popularity in arthroscopic stabilization. It was proven to preserve bone stock, smaller in size thus more anchors can be made.Presentation of caseWe presented a case of 27-year-old woman with recurrent anterior dislocation after seven years of arthroscopic Bankart repair. Seven years before, we performed Bankart repair using three 2.8 mm fiber-wire anchor (FASTak® (Arthrex, Karsfield Germany)). For the revision surgery we performed arthroscopic revision using four all suture anchor technique (Y-Knot® Flex All-Suture Anchor, 1.3 mm – One strand of #2 Hi-Fi® (Conmed, New York)).DiscussionFrom preoperative and intraoperative assessment, we found no anchor failure and no massive bony lesion. To preserve the bone stock we insert four all suture anchors between the old anchor. One year post-operative follow up showed that patient could gain normal range of movement. No early or late complications were observed.ConclusionCompared to the conventional metallic anchor, all suture anchor has the same biomechanical strength. Moreover due to its relatively small size, it can reserve bone stock and more anchors can be made thus adding more stability to the shoulder.     

A New Model for Repair of the Achilles Tendon in the Rat

ABSTRACT

The Sprague-Dawley rat is an excellent model for studies of Achilles tendon repair. Most researchers use a modification of the Kessler technique for suture repair of the Achilles tendon in rats. While this technique provides adequate strength, early mobilization is not recommended. Prior to healing, the load will be borne completely by the suture repair, subjecting it to rupture. To prevent this complication, investigators employing the Kessler repair often immobilize the operative extremity with a cast or splint. This has also been shown to be detrimental to the peak load borne by the tendons prior to rupture. A double-loop locking technique of suture repair for rat Achilles tendons is favored over the modified Kessler technique. As force is applied across the repair, the suture pulls on the tendon, sharing the load. This allows for early mobilization of repaired tendons, with minimal risk of rupture. Additionally, no immobilization is required for the operative extremity. One hundred repairs have been performed using this double-loop locking technique. All animals have been able to mobilize with minimal limp immediately after recovering from anesthesia, and there have been no ruptures. No other complications have occurred (hematoma, seroma, infection, dehiscence). This technique of tendon repair is ideal for use in studies of tendon repair in the rat, since it is easy to perform and eliminates the need for immobilization of the operative leg.     

Comparison between tenocutaneous suture and Kessler suture techniques in treating acute closed Achilles tendon rupture

BackgroundTo compare the effectiveness of tenocutaneous suture and conventional Kessler suture techniques in treating acute closed Achilles tendon rupture.MethodsA total of 33 patients with acute closed Achilles tendon rupture who were admitted to our hospital from February 1998 to December 2008 underwent repair with either a tenocutaneous suture or Kessler suture technique. All patients were followed up for 1–5 years (mean, 3 years).ResultsAccording to the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle–hindfoot scale, the excellence rate was 91% in the Kessler suture group and 98% in the tenocutaneous suture group, with a significant difference between groups.ConclusionOur tenocutaneous suture technique is an effective method for treating Achilles tendon rupture. It has certain advantages compared with the conventional incision method and is worthy of wide clinical application.