Intestinal graft versus native liver cytokine expression in a rat model of intestinal transplantation with and without donor-specific cell augmentation

BACKGROUND: Immunomodulatory strategies such as donor-specific bone marrow or blood transfusions have been used to promote engraftment after intestinal transplants. We previously showed that delivery of donor antigen via the portal vein can effectively reduce the rate of intestinal graft rejection. The purpose of our current study was to investigate the impact of donor-specific cell augmentation (blood versus bone marrow) via the portal vein on cytokine expression in intestinal grafts versus native livers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed heterotopic small intestinal transplants between male Brown-Norway (donor) and female Lewis (recipient) rats. We studied 10 groups according to the type of donor-specific cell augmentation and the use and dose of immunosuppressive therapy. For cell augmentation, donor-specific blood or bone marrow was transfused via the donor portal vein immediately before graft implantation. For immunosuppression, tacrolimus was used post-transplant at a high or low dose. Control rats received neither immunosuppression nor cell augmentation. Tissue samples for histological assessment were obtained at designated time points. RNA was extracted from intestinal graft and native liver biopsies for cytokine measurements (IL-1 alpha, IL-1 beta, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha, and TNF-beta). Chimerism levels were determined using Q-PCR analysis. RESULTS: Without concurrent immunosuppression, neither portal donor-specific blood nor bone marrow transfusion reduced the rate of rejection. With immunosuppression, outcome was significantly better after portal donor-specific blood (versus bone marrow) transfusion. Irrespective of the type of donor-specific cell augmentation, severe rejection caused strong cytokine expression in the grafts of IL-1 alpha, IL-1 beta, IFN-gamma, and TNF-alpha; in the native livers, mainly of TNF-alpha (with IFN-gamma showing hardly any increase). In general, rejection caused stronger cytokine expression in the grafts than in the native livers. Mild rejection correlated well with strong intragraft expression of IL-6, TNF-alpha, and TNF-beta (early rejection markers); severe rejection with IL-1 alpha, IL-1 beta, IFN-gamma, and TNF-alpha (late rejection markers).In addition to cell augmentation per se, the type of cell augmentation also had an impact on cytokine expression in both grafts and native livers. Cell-augmented (versus tacrolimus-treated) rats showed hardly any differences in intragraft cytokine expression, but the expression of almost all cytokines was significantly stronger in the native livers. With immunosuppression, bone marrow infusion increased intragraft cytokine expression of IL-1 alpha, IL-1 beta, IFN-gamma, and TNF alpha, as well as liver cytokine expression of IL-1 beta, compared to blood transfusion. This finding reflected the more advanced rejection stages in the bone marrow infused group; different types of donor-specific cell augmentation had similar effects on liver cytokine expression. In the absence of myoablative therapy, chimerism levels were low, in both cell-augmented and non-cell-augmented groups. CONCLUSIONS: Rejection and donor-specific cell augmentation independently causes differences in intragraft versus native liver cytokine expression after intestinal transplants. Portal donor-specific blood transfusion, as compared with donor-specific bone marrow infusion, lowered the incidence of rejection and diminished intragraft cytokine up-regulation.     

The use of intravenous tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil as induction and maintenance immunosuppression in simultaneous pancreas--kidney recipients with previous transplants

Clinical trials using quadruple immunosuppression that include the combination of tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) have been shown to reduce the incidence of acute rejection episodes in simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation. In attempting to obtain a low rejection rate without antibody induction therapy, we proceeded with the combination of TAC intravenous (i.v.), MMF, and steroids as induction therapy and as primary immunosuppression for recipients with previous transplants. In this study, we analyzed 10 patients who received previous transplants, treated with low-dose TAC i.v. as induction therapy. Group A consisted of 6 patients with previous transplants that underwent SPK and group B consisted of four recipients with previous SPK that underwent cadaveric kidney transplants. For group A, the previous transplants were: living related kidney (LRK) followed by islet cell (IC) transplant (n=2), LRK transplant (n=1), cadaver kidney (CAD) and IC transplant (n=1), SPK (n=1), and three previous CAD kidney transplants (n=1). In group A, all six kidneys were lost due to recurrent diabetic nephropathy, IC possibly to rejection, and the pancreas due to thrombosis. In group B with previous SPK transplants, three recipients lost their kidney to chronic rejection and one to long-term use of a nephrotoxic antibiotic. Currently, in all group A and B patients, the kidney and the pancreas are functioning, although 1 patient in group A developed type 2 diabetes (normal fasting C-peptide). Two patients in group A developed three rejection episodes that responded to steroid treatment. The results indicate the TAC i.v. in combination with oral TAC, MMF, and steroids offer effective induction therapy in patients with previous transplants.     

Comparison of steroid avoidance in tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus/sirolimus combination in kidney transplantation monitored by surveillance biopsy

BACKGROUND: Chronic steroid therapy in kidney transplantation has myriad side effects and steroid avoidance has become feasible. This prospective study compared the safety and efficacy of steroid avoidance in tacrolimus (TAC)/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and TAC/sirolimus (SRL) combinations in kidney transplantation. METHODS: In all, 150 kidney recipients were analyzed: 75 each in TAC/MMF and TAC/SRL groups. The primary endpoint was acute rejection. Surveillance biopsies were completed to analyze subclinical acute rejection (SCAR) and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). Acute rejection and SCAR were treated by methylprednisolone. Two-year patient and graft survival, renal function, and adverse effects were monitored. RESULTS: Acute rejection was seen in 12% of TAC/MMF and 8% of TAC/SRL patients. Two-year actuarial patient survival was 95% and 97%, and graft survival 90% and 90% in TAC/MMF and TAC/SRL groups, respectively. Surveillance biopsy showed cumulative incidence of SCAR was 27 % in TAC/MMF and 16 % in TAC/SRL groups at 2 years (P = 0.04). Overall, 33% of recipients in TAC/MMF and 20% in TAC/SRL received methylprednisolone for acute rejection/SCAR. Moderate/severe CAN was 10% in TAC/SRL group and 22% in TAC/MMF group(P = 0.06). New-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) was 4% each in both groups. All recipients remain free of maintenance steroid therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Steroid avoidance in tacrolimus-based immunosuppression with MMF or SRL provides equivalent 2-year patient and graft survival with a low incidence of acute rejection and NODM. SCAR and CAN are lower in TAC/SRL compared to TAC/MMF group. The impact of decreased SCAR and CAN in TAC/SRL group on longer-term graft survival and function is to be evaluated.     

Initial clinical experience with interleukin-2 receptor antagonist induction in combination with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation

Since 1996, our standard immunosuppressive protocol for simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation (SKPT) has been tacrolimus (TAC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids without antibody induction. When basiliximab and daclizumab, monoclonal antibodies directed against the interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R), became available, we selectively added these agents to our standard protocol. The purpose of this prospective, open-label study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of IL-2 receptor antagonists in SKPT. From April 1998 to August 1999, 35 SKPTS were performed. One patient with delayed graft function received Thymoglobulin and was excluded; 17 received no induction, and 17 received IL-2R antagonists (9 basiliximab, 8 daclizumab) as induction. Demographic- and transplant characteristics were similar between the two groups. At 6 months, patient survival was 88 % (15/17) in the induction arm compared to 100 % (17/17) in the no-induction arm, P = NS. The 2 causes of death were sepsis and hemolytic uremic syndrome, and both patients died with functioning grafts. Death-censored pancreas and kidney graft survival rates in the induction and the no-induction groups were 88 % vs. 100 % respectively, in both groups. The incidence of acute rejection (kidney or pancreas) at 6 months did not differ between the two groups (35 % in both groups). Biopsy proven pancreas and kidney acute rejections were 35 % vs. 24 % and 12 % vs. 12 % in the induction- and no-induction groups, respectively. The incidences of major infection and readmission did not differ between groups. TAC trough levels and mean daily doses of TAC, MMF and steroids did not differ between the two groups at 1, 3, and 6 months. The incidence of event-free survival (no death, rejection, or graft loss) at 6 months was 59 % (10/17) in the induction and 65 % (11/17) in the no-induction group. Basiliximab and daclizumab appear to be safe in SKPT. However, the preliminary results of this study do not demonstrate a significant benefit in either reducing the incidence of acute rejection or improving outcomes at 6 months. Larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm these findings. Received: 4 July 2000 Revised: 15 January 2001 Accepted: 3 September 2001     

Steroid withdrawal at 3 months after kidney transplantation: a comparison of two tacrolimus-based regimens

The 6 month prospective, randomized study compared the steroid-sparing potential of two tacrolimus-based regimens after renal transplantation. A total of 489 patients were randomized (1:1) to receive tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/steroids (n = 243; group Tac/MMF/S) or tacrolimus/azathioprine/steroids (n = 246; group Tac/Aza/S). At 3 months, steroids were tapered off in 267 (54.6%) patients free from steroid-resistant acute rejection and with serum creatinine concentrations <160 micromol/l. The incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection at month 3 was lower in group Tac/MMF/S compared with group Tac/Aza/S (18.1% vs. 26.0%,P = 0.035). Moreover, more patients in the Tac/MMF/S group met the criteria for steroid withdrawal than in the Tac/Aza/S group (60.5% vs. 48.8%; P < 0.01). The incidence of acute rejection during months 4-6 was low in all groups, both for patients on steroid-free dual therapy (Tac/MMF: 2.7%, Tac/Aza: 0.8%) and for patients who continued steroid maintenance therapy (Tac/MMF/S: 3.5%, Tac/Aza/S: 7.1%). Moreover, kidney function was well preserved in steroid-free patients with month 6 median serum creatinine levels of 119.5 micromol/l (Tac/MMF), and 115.1 micromol/l (Tac/Aza). For patients who continued to receive steroids, month 6 median creatinine levels were 130.5 micromol/l (Tac/MMF/S) and 132.8 micromol/l (Tac/Aza/S). The criteria for the selection of patients to discontinue steroids were adequate. Both tacrolimus-based regimens allowed the safe discontinuation of steroids in low-risk patients at month 3. The Tac/MMF combination was superior in the prevention of acute rejections and more patients met the chosen criteria for steroid withdrawal.     

The renal benefit of mycophenolate mofetil after liver transplantation

Haywood S, Abecassis M, Levitsky J. The renal benefit of mycophenolate mofetil after liver transplantation.
Clin Transplant 2011: 25: E88–E95. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Background: The risk and benefit of adding mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to a standard immunosuppressive regimen at the time of liver transplantation (LT) is not well described. Methods: We performed a retrospective case–control analysis comparing one‐yr outcomes of all LT recipients at our institution treated with post‐operative tacrolimus (TAC), MMF, and steroids vs. TAC and steroids. Results: A total of 101 LT recipients (50:51 case:control) were analyzed. Despite more renal dysfunction at LT, the MMF + TAC group had similar serum creatinine (Cr) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) as the TAC group one‐yr post‐LT. In this time period, Cr decreased (1.57–1.22 mg/dL, p = 0.04) and GFR increased (57.5–65.1 mL/min per 1.73 m², p = 0.05) in the MMF + TAC group, while Cr increased (1.11–1.35, p < 0.01) and GFR declined (73.5–60.1, p < 0.001) in the TAC group. These findings occurred without a difference in absolute rejection episodes, hospitalizations, infections, deaths, or time to above events (p > 0.05). Subgroup analysis of patients stratified by pre‐transplant renal dysfunction (Cr ≥ 1.2 mg/dL) supported the previous. MMF was reasonably well tolerated with a low rate of discontinuation. Conclusions: The use of adjunctive MMF immediately after LT may protect against calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity, potentially without the need for dose reduction or increased risk of adverse events.     

Complete freedom from rejection after intestinal transplantation using a new tolerogenic protocol combined with low immunosuppression

BACKGROUND: Intestinal transplantation (Itx) remains the most difficult form of transplantation. This is due to the high immunogenicity of the bowel that currently obligates Itx patients to heavy immunosuppression, which causes infection, posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD), and drug toxicity. Wider application of Itx depends on the development of tolerogenic strategies to promote engraftment while reducing the need for immunosuppression. We applied a strategy to clinical Itx that combines intraportal donor-specific blood transfusion with a deliberately low immunosuppression protocol (no high-dose steroids; lower tacrolimus level). METHODS: A 55-year-old patient received a combined liver/Itx. Donor-specific whole blood was taken from the donor during procurement and transfused in the recipient portal vein after graft reperfusion. For induction immunosuppression, no intravenous bolus of steroids was given; only two doses of anti-interleukin 2 receptor antibody were administered. The patient received posttransplantation maintenance immunosuppression with lower tacrolimus levels than average (15 ng/ml first month; 5-10 ng/ml thereafter), low-dose azathioprine (1 mg/kg first to third months; 0.5 mg/kg thereafter), and low-dose steroids (Medrol 8 mg twice daily first and second months; 4 mg twice thereafter). The patient was monitored for rejection, graft-versus-host disease, infection, and PTLD. Protocol biopsy specimens were taken from the distal ileum (2 per week). RESULTS: Clinical, endoscopic, and histologic signs of rejection did not develop. Chimerism was identified at day 28. Graft-versus-host disease was absent clinically. Chimerism was self-limiting and disappeared without modifying baseline immunosuppression and without observing a change in graft function. The patient remained free of systemic opportunistic infections, PTLD, and drug toxicity. Total parenteral nutrition was stopped at 7 weeks after transplantation. The patient remains free of total parenteral nutrition and free of rejection at 14 months after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: We describe an Itx patient who remained rejection free despite receiving significantly lower immunosuppression than average. We hypothesize that intraoperative immunomodulation via intraportal donor-specific blood transfusion in the absence of nonspecific overimmunosuppression promoted Itx acceptance.     

Tacrolimus with Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) or Sirolimus vs. Cyclosporine with MMF in Cardiac Transplant Patients: 1-Year Report

The most advantageous combination of immunosuppressive agents for cardiac transplant recipients has not yet been established. Between November 2001 and June 2003, 343 de novo cardiac transplant recipients were randomized to receive steroids and either tacrolimus (TAC) + sirolimus (SRL), TAC + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or cyclosporine (CYA) + MMF. Antilymphocyte induction therapy was allowed for up to 5 days. The primary endpoint of >/=3A rejection or hemodynamic compromise rejection requiring treatment showed no significant difference at 6 months (TAC/MMF 22.4%, TAC/SRL 24.3%, CYA/MMF 31.6%, p = 0.271) and 1 year (p = 0.056), but it was significantly lower in the TAC/MMF group when compared only to the CYA/MMF group at 1 year (23.4% vs. 36.8%; p = 0.029). Differences in the incidence of any treated rejection were significant (TAC/SRL = 35%, TAC/MMF = 42%, CYA/MMF = 59%; p < 0.001), as were median levels of serum creatinine (TAC/SRL = 1.5 mg/dL, TAC/MMF = 1.3 mg/dL, CYA/MMF = 1.5 mg/dL; p = 0.032) and triglycerides (TAC/SRL = 162 mg/dL, TAC/MMF = 126 mg/dL, CYA/MMF = 154 mg/dL; p = 0.028). The TAC/SRL group encountered fewer viral infections but more fungal infections and impaired wound healing. These secondary endpoints suggest that the TAC/MMF combination appears to offer more advantages than TAC/SRL or CYA/MMF in cardiac transplant patients, including fewer >/=3A rejections or hemodynamic compromise rejections and an improved side-effect profile.     

Cyclosporine Sparing with Mycophenolate Mofetil, Daclizumab and Corticosteroids in Renal Allograft Recipients: The CAESAR Study

Although the calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) cyclosporine (CsA) and tacrolimus are highly effective immunosuppressants, they are associated with serious side effects. There is great interest in immunosuppressive regimens that permit reduction or elimination of CNIs, while maintaining adequate immunosuppression and acceptable acute rejection rates. Patients (n = 536) receiving their first renal allograft were randomized to one of three immunosuppressant regimens: daclizumab, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), corticosteroids (CS) and low-dose CsA (target trough levels of 50-100 ng/mL), weaned from month 4 and withdrawn by month 6; daclizumab, MMF, CS and low-dose CsA; or MMF, CS and standard-dose CsA. Mean GFR 12 months after transplantation (primary end point) was not statistically different in the CsA withdrawal and low-dose CsA groups (both 50.9 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) vs. the standard-dose CsA group (48.6 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). At 12 months, the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was significantly higher in the CsA withdrawal group (38%) vs. the low- or standard-dose CsA groups (25.4% and 27.5%, respectively; p < 0.05). In summary, a regimen of continuous low-dose CsA with MMF, CS and daclizumab induction is a clinically safe and effective immunosuppressive regimen in renal transplant recipients.     

Comparison of four different immunosuppression protocols without long-term steroid therapy in kidney recipients monitored by surveillance biopsy: five-year outcomes

Induction and maintenance immunosuppression protocols with or without long-term steroid therapy in kidney transplant recipients are variable and are transplant center-specific. The aim of this prospective randomized pilot study was to compare 5-year outcomes in kidney recipients maintained on 4 different calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppression protocols without long-term steroid therapy. Two hundred consenting patients who received kidney transplants between June 2000 and October 2004 were enrolled in 4 immunosuppression protocol groups, with 50 patients in each group: cyclosporine (CSA)/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), CSA/sirolimus (SRL), tacrolimus (TAC)/MMF, and TAC/SRL. Induction therapy was done with basiliximab and methylprednisolone. Steroids were withdrawn on post-transplant day 2, and long-term steroid therapy was not used. Demographic characteristics among the four groups were comparable; approximately 50% of the recipients were African American and > or =80% of the kidneys transplanted were from deceased donors. Clinical acute rejection (CAR) was confirmed by biopsy and treated with intravenous pulse steroid therapy. Steroid-unresponsive CAR was treated with Thymoglobulin. Surveillance biopsies were performed at 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months to evaluate subclinical acute rejection (SCAR), chronic allograft injury (CAI), and other pathological changes per the Banff 2005 schema. The primary end point was CAR, and secondary end points were 5-year patient and graft survival rates, renal function, SCAR, CAI, and adverse events. In the first year post-transplant, the incidence of CAR was 18% in the CSA/MMF group, 8% in the CSA/SRL group, 14% in the TAC/MMF group, and 4% in the TAC/SRL group (CSA/MMF vs. TAC/SRL; p=0.05). The incidence of SCAR was 22% in the CSA/MMF group, 8% in the CSA/SRL group, 16% in the TAC/MMF group, and 6% in the TAC/SRL group (CSA/MMF vs. CSA/SRL and TAC/SRL; p=0.05). After the first year, the incidences of CAR and SCAR decreased and were comparable in all 4 groups. At 5 years post-transplant, cumulative CAI due to interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA), hypertension (HTN), and chronic calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) toxicity was observed in 54%, 48%, and 8% of the CSA/MMF group vs. 16%, 36%, and 12% of the CSA/SRL group vs. 38%, 24% and 6% of the TAC/MMF group vs. 14%, 25% and 12% of the TAC/SLR group (IF/TA: CSA/MMF vs. CSA/SRL and TAC/SRL; p=0.04, HTN: CSA/MMF vs. TAC/MMF and TAC/SRL; p=0.05, CNI toxicity: TAC/SRL and CSA/SRL vs. TAC/MMF; p=0.05). Five-year patient and graft survival rates were 82% and 60% in the CSA/MMF group, 82% and 60% in the CSA/SRL group, 84% and 62% in the TAC/MMF group, and 82% and 64% in the TAC/SRL group (p=0.9). Serum creatinine levels and creatinine clearances at 5 years were comparable among the groups. Our data show that the rates of CAR and SCAR in the first year post-transplant were significantly lower in the CSA/SRL and TAC/SRL groups and that cumulative CAI rates due to IF/TA and HTN at 5 years were significantly lower in the TAC/MMF, TAC/SRL, and CSA/SRL groups than in the CSA/MMF group. Despite significant differences in the incidences of CAR and SCAR and prevalence of different types of CAI at 5 years, renal function and patient and graft survival rates at 5 years were comparable among kidney recipients maintained on 4 different immunosuppression protocols without long-term steroid therapy.     

A prospective randomized trial of tacrolimus and prednisone versus tacrolimus, prednisone and mycophenolate mofetil in primary adult liver transplantation: a single center report

BACKGROUND: Tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) are currently approved immunosuppressants for prevention of rejection in liver transplantation (LTx). They have different modes of action and toxicity profiles, but the efficacy and safety of MMF in primary liver transplantation with TAC has not been determined. METHODS: An Institutional Review Board-approved, open-label, single-center, prospective randomized trial was initiated to study the efficacy and toxicity of TAC and steroids (double-drug therapy (D)) versus TAC, steroids, and MMF (triple-drug therapy (T)) in primary adult LTx recipients. Both groups of patients were started on the same doses of TAC and steroids. Patients randomized to T also received 1 gm MMF twice a day. RESULTS: Between August 1995 and May 1998, 350 patients were enrolled at a single center-175 in the D and 175 in the T groups. All patients were followed until May 1998, with a mean follow-up of 33.8+/-9.1 months. Using an intention-to-treat analysis, the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year patient survival was 85.1%, 81.6%, 78.6%, and 75.8%, respectively, for D and 87.4%, 85.4%, 81.3%, and 79.9%, respectively, for T. The 4-year graft survival was 70% for D and 72.1% for T. Although the rate of acute rejection in the first 3 months was significantly lower for T than for D (28% for triple vs. 38.9% for double, P=0.03), the overall rate of rejection for T at the end of 1 year was not significantly lower than for the D (38.9% triple vs. 45.2% double). The median time to the first episode of rejection was 14 days for D versus 24 days for T (P=0.008). During the study period, 38 of 175 patients in D received MMF to control ongoing acute rejection, nephrotoxicity, and/or neurotoxicity. On the other hand, 103 patients in the T discontinued MMF for infection, myelosuppression, and/or gastrointestinal disturbances. The need for corticosteroids was less after 6 months for T and the perioperative need for dialysis was lower with use of MMF. CONCLUSION: This final report confirms similar patient survival and graft survival up to 4 years with a trend towards fewer episodes of rejection, lower need for steroids, and better perioperative renal function. However, the complex nature of LTx patients and their posttransplantation course prevents the routine application of MMF.     

The effect of 2-gram versus 1-gram concentration controlled mycophenolate mofetil on renal transplant outcomes using sirolimus-based calcineurin inhibitor drug-free immunosuppression

BACKGROUND: We performed a sequential study to determine the efficacy and side effects of low-dose (1 g) mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in a CNI drug avoidance regimen including sirolimus/steroids. METHODS: A total of 260 kidney-only recipients were given basiliximab (232) or thymoglobulin (28) induction, and sirolimus/steroids. In addition, 160 recipients were begun on standard MMF 1 g twice daily (2-g group), while 100 recipients were begun on low-dose MMF 500 mg twice daily (1-g group). The 1-g recipients were concentration controlled to keep mycophenolic acid (MPA) C0 levels at 1.8-4 microg/ml. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in demographics between the groups. At 6 months there were no significant differences between the 2-g and 1-g MMF groups in patient survival (96.8% vs. 96%), graft survival (92.5% vs. 95%), biopsy-confirmed and treated acute rejection (8.8% vs. 13%), or mean creatinine mg/dL (1.41+/-0.52 vs. 1.47+/-0.67), respectively. Mean MPA C0 levels microg/ml were (4.7 vs. 2.3) at 1 month, (4.1 vs. 3.1) at 3 months, and (3.9 vs. 2.4) at 6 months. There were no significant differences at 1, 3, or 6 months in mean WBC, HgB, or platelets, or wound complications. There were significant reductions in the number of patients reporting nausea-vomiting-dyspepsia (20.6% vs. 8%, P=0.007), diarrhea (34.3% vs. 20%, P=0.01), and abdominal pains (10.6% vs. 4%, P=0.05), between the 2-g and 1-g MMF groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The use of concentration-controlled 1-g MMF results in comparable transplant outcomes with less GI toxicity during the first 6 months posttransplant in a CNI drug-free sirolimus based immunosuppressive regimen.     

Randomized prospective trial of early steroid withdrawal compared with low-dose steroids in renal transplant recipients using serial protocol biopsies to assess efficacy and safety

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroid therapy after renal transplantation is associated with many adverse effects. Newer immunosuppressive agents may allow for safe and effective reductions in dose or early steroid withdrawal. METHODS: In this prospective, single-center clinical trial, 60 patients were randomized into 2 groups: control patients (n = 28), who received low doses of prednisone throughout, and study patients (n = 32), who were withdrawn from steroids 7 days posttransplant. Patients received a limited course of rabbit antilymphocyte globulin (rALG) induction therapy, tacrolimus (TAC), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Patients were followed for clinical outcomes and renal function. Protocol biopsies were performed at 1, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: Clinical rejections occurred in 11% of controls and 13% of study patients. Renal function was well maintained and equivalent in both groups. In all, 111 protocol biopsies were performed without complications. Subclinical rejection was noted in only 2 protocol biopsies, and borderline changes were seen in 12 biopsies, all of which were distributed equally between both groups. Unsuspected acute TAC toxicity was seen in 8 biopsies. Protocol biopsies led to changes in therapy in 10% of patients. In both groups, serial protocol biopsies demonstrated increased allograft fibrosis over time, which was significant at 1 year in the steroid withdrawal group. CONCLUSION: The immunosuppressive combination of rALG, TAC, and MMF prevents subclinical rejection and the need for high doses of steroids after transplantation. However, continual low-dose steroid therapy may aid in preventing chronic allograft fibrosis. Protocol biopsies help define the short-term and long-term risks of steroid withdrawal therapy.     

Albuminuria after renal transplantation: maintenance with sirolimus/low-dose tacrolimus vs. mycophenolate mofetil/high-dose tacrolimus

Maintenance immunosuppression with sirolimus (SRL) in renal transplantation has been associated with proteinuria. We report long-term outcomes of kidney transplant recipients maintained on steroid-free regimens, either SRL with low-dose tacrolimus (SRL/L-Tac) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with high-dose tacrolimus (MMF/H-Tac). We conducted a case-matched study of 50 patients receiving MMF/H-Tac, matched 1:2 with 100 patients maintained on SRL/L-Tac. All patients were induced with rabbit antithymocyte globulin followed by early steroid withdrawal. Comparisons were made of patient and graft survival, graft function, acute rejection, and albuminuria. There were no significant differences between the SRL/L-Tac and MMF/H-Tac groups for patient survival, graft survival, occurrence of acute rejection, or graft function. There was no difference in the proportion of patients with albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) ≥300 μg/mg (19% vs. 20%), but more patients in the SRL group were receiving renin-angiotensin system blocking agents (72% vs. 53%, p = 0.04). Only flushing the donor kidney with histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution (vs. UW solution) was predictive of albuminuria. Long-term outcomes are similar at our center for kidney transplant patients receiving either SRL/L-Tac or MMF/H-Tac. Although the occurrence of albuminuria was not different, significantly more SRL-treated patients were receiving antiproteinuric medications.     

A "steroid-free" tacrolimus and low-dose mycophenolate mofetil primary immunosuppression does not prevent early acute rejection after liver transplantation

To assess the efficacy and safety of a primary immunosuppressive regimen with tacrolimus (Tac) and low-dose mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) without steroids and to determine the exposure to mycophenolic acid (MPA) in the early postoperative period, we performed a single-center, randomized 1:1, open-label, controlled study planned to be 60 liver transplantation patients randomized into 2 groups: group A, tacrolimus + MMF (750 mg orally twice a day); and group B, tacrolimus + MMF (750 mg orally twice a day) + steroids. After an interim analysis by the ethical committee patient enrollment was stopped. Data from 30 patients (12 in group A and 18 in group B with a mean follow-up period of 31 +/- 7 months) showed a patient survival rate of 91.7% in group A and 100% in group B and a graft survival rate of 91.7% and 88.9%, respectively. Nine patients (75%) in group A suffered an acute rejection episode, whereas in group B only 3 patients (16.7%) showed acute rejection (P = .002). All rejection episodes occurred in both groups at 1 week after transplantation. The difference in histological grading was statistically significant (P = .021). The toxicity profiles were similar in both groups. A primary immunosuppressive regimen based on Tac and low-dose MMF without steroids is safe but unable to prevent acute rejection at 1 week after transplantation even if early acute rejection does not affect the outcome in terms of morbidity and graft or patient survival.     

WOFIE synergizes with calcineurin-inhibitor treatment and early steroid withdrawal in kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND: According to the window of opportunity for immunologic engagement (WOFIE) concept, as designed by R. Calne, the authors prospectively analyzed the effect of a 72-hr immunosuppressive window on graft function in renal transplant recipients. METHODS: Immunosuppressive therapy comprised tacrolimus (trough levels, 5-8 ng/mL after day 8 posttransplantation), daclizumab (1 mg/kg body weight at day 0 and 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks posttransplantation), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (1-2 g/day), and prednisolone. All patients received an induction therapy including daclizumab, prednisolone, and MMF. WOFIE patients were stopped from immunosuppression for 72 hr posttransplant. Steroids were withdrawn in both groups 12 to 16 weeks after transplantation and dual therapy with MMF and low-dose tacrolimus ensued. RESULTS: Thirty renal transplant recipients (16 in the WOFIE group and 14 in the control group) have been enrolled since May 2000. Patient and graft survival were 93.8% and 87.5%, respectively, in the WOFIE group and 100.0% and 92.9% in the control group, respectively. One patient in the WOFIE group died of cytomegalovirus infection with stable graft function. There were no grafts lost because of acute rejection or primary nonfunction in either group. Patients treated according to the WOFIE protocol revealed less acute rejection episodes during the time of observation (first biopsy-confirmed acute rejection rate 12.5% in the WOFIE group vs. 42.9% in the control cohort). Whereas 92.1% of the WOFIE patients were successfully discontinued from steroids, permanent steroid withdrawal was achieved in only 60% of the control cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Initial interruption of immunosuppression was associated with a decrease of acute graft rejections. Subsequently, the authors postulate a synergistic effect on the immunosuppressive efficiency of calcineurin inhibitors when combined with an initial drug-free window.     

Clear benefit of mycophenolate mofetil-based triple therapy in reducing the incidence of acute rejection after living donor renal transplantations.

BACKGROUND: According to a pooled analysis of three randomized clinical studies concerning the prevention of acute rejection in cadaveric renal transplantation, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) proved superior to azathioprine or placebo in conjunction with cyclosporine (CsA) and steroids. MMF-treated patients showed reduced incidence and severity of acute rejection, similar graft survival, and better graft function over 12 months. However, the multicenter trials did not include the Asian recipients of living donor kidneys. METHODS: To assess the efficacy of MMF as the third component of a triple therapy in addition to CsA-Neoral and steroids in living donor renal transplantation recipients in Asians, a total of 100 recipients were randomized to receive CsA-Neoral and steroids (control group, n=50), or MMF-based triple therapy (1.0 g of MMF twice daily from postoperative day 2, MMF group, n=50). The dosing plan for Neoral and steroids was essentially same between groups. During 12 months of follow-up, we compared the incidence of acute rejection, adverse events such as infections, and 12-month actual graft and patient survival. RESULTS: The graft and patient survival at 1 year was excellent in both groups: 96/98% in the control group and 98/100% in the MMF group, respectively. MMF significantly reduced the proportion of patients with at least one episode of acute rejection (34% in the control group vs. 14% in the MMF group), cumulative incidence of acute rejection episodes (46% vs. 16%), and requirement of antilymphocyte antibody (21.7% vs. 12.5%). In the MMF group, viral infection such as herpes zoster or chicken pox was more prevalent than in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Like cadaveric renal transplantation, this open clinical trial showed MMF to be effective in reducing the incidence and severity of acute rejection if used in conjunction with Neoral and steroids after living donor renal transplantation in Asian ethnicity.     

Conversion to low-dose tacrolimus or rapamycin 3 months after kidney transplantation: a prospective, protocol biopsy-guided study

Long-term survival of kidney allografts is primarily limited by a progressive decline in function characterized by the presence of interstitial fibrosis (IF) and tubular atrophy (TA) on biopsy. Since chronic calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI) drug toxicity has been implicated as a significant cause of IF/TA, a major effort in transplantation has been to decrease or eliminate CNI therapy. We now report the clinical and histological consequences of converting renal transplant recipients at 3 months to either very low levels of tacrolimus (TAC; 4-6 ng/mL) or sirolimus (SRL; 6-10 ng/mL) therapy. Fifty-eight enrollees in this prospective randomized trial received low-dose (2.9 ± 0.6 mg/kg) rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction followed by standard doses of TAC (10-15 ng/mL), mycophenolic acid, and low-dose steroids for 3 months. Protocol biopsies were performed at implantation and 3 and 12 months. Six patients had evidence of either borderline changes (n = 5) or grade 1A rejection (n = 1) on the 3-month protocol biopsy and were not randomized. Only one patient had clinically evident rejection that occurred after randomization to SRL. One patient in each group had borderline changes at 12 months. Renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate) was equivalent in both groups at 12 months (TAC 74 ± 15 vs SRL 66 ± 18 mL/min, P = .22). Chronic allograft damage index scores at 1 year were similar in both groups (TAC 2.8 ± 2.4 vs SRL 2.0 ± 2.7, P = .71). The percentage of patients with IF/TA scores greater than 2 at 1 year was low in both groups (TAC 12% vs SRL 9%, P = .78). Therefore, in a low-risk population defined as having a normal 3-month protocol biopsy, TAC levels can be successfully decreased to very low concentrations. One-year graft function and histology were equally well maintained with either low-dose TAC or SRL immunosuppression.     

Basiliximab plus low-dose cyclosporin vs. OKT3 for induction immunosuppression following renal transplantation

BACKGROUND: Current immunosuppressive therapies are very effective in preventing acute rejection (AR) and graft loss following renal transplantation. Newer agents now make it possible to develop equally efficacious but better tolerated and less toxic strategies. This is especially relevant for our ageing recipients. We now compare the efficacy of basiliximab combined with early low-dose cyclosporin therapy to standard OKT3 induction therapy. METHODS: In this single-centre study, 100 consecutive recipients of cadaveric kidney transplants from November 1998 to August 2000 were treated with basiliximab combined with early low-dose cyclosporin, reduced steroids and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Clinical outcomes at 100 d and 1 yr were compared with a group of 26 patients transplanted from March 1995 to November 1998 who received OKT3, delayed full-dose cyclosporin, high-dose steroids and MMF. Amongst basiliximab treated patients, we compared clinical outcomes in those older and younger than 60 yr. RESULTS: Both groups were similar except for a shorter cold ischaemic time in the basiliximab group. Length of stay, number of readmissions, total hospitalization days and cytomegalovirus infections were lower in the basiliximab group. Despite a 40% reduction in steroids, basiliximab-treated patients had fewer biopsy-proven episodes of AR (basiliximab 14% vs. OKT3 35%) and required less antilymphocyte antibody therapy. Clinical outcomes including patient and graft survival were no different between groups. Long-term graft survival for patients over 60 yr was limited primarily by mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with OKT3 induction therapy, the combination of early low-dose cyclosporin and basiliximab is steroid sparing, effective, well tolerated and relatively safe.     

The impact of Campath 1H induction in adult liver allotransplantation

BACKGROUND: We report our experience with Campath 1H in adult liver allotransplantation. METHODS: Between December 2001 and February 2004, 77 patients underwent liver transplantation using Campath 1H induction and low-dose maintenance tacrolimus immunosuppression. The control group consisted of 50 patients with similar baseline characteristics and the same eligibility criteria, transplanted under our standard Tacrolimus/steroids regimen. Hepatitis C patients were excluded from the study. RESULTS: Patient and graft survival were similar for both groups. The incidence of rejection was significantly lower in the Campath vs the control group (51% vs 65% at 12 months, P = .009). Tacrolimus trough levels and conversion from Tacrolimus or the addition of other immunosuppressive drugs due to nephrotoxicity were also significantly lower in the Campath 1H group. CONCLUSION: Campath 1H induction with low-dose Tacrolimus maintenance immunosuppression is an effective regimen in reducing acute rejection in adult liver transplantation, while maintaining lower tacrolimus levels and less nephrotoxicity than our conventional immunosuppressive regimen.