Rationale for use of Tdap booster vaccines for adolescent immunization: overview of efficacy, safety, and clinical use

Pertussis is one of the only vaccine-preventable diseases with increasing incidence in the United States. The incidence of pertussis infection in adolescents is a growing concern; it can be a severe disease that may lead to significant morbidity and mortality when transmitted to susceptible populations (eg, infants). Experts have conceded that booster vaccination of adolescents may considerably decrease the incidence of pertussis infections in previously immunized, partially immunized, and nonimmunized populations. Studies in 2 tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) booster vaccines licensed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have shown efficacy against pertussis disease and have demonstrated a safety profile comparable to tetanus and diphtheria vaccine (Td) in adolescents. Immunization schedules now include use of Tdap vaccines for preadolescent and adolescent populations to counter the increase in pertussis outbreaks. Challenges for clinicians include prompt recognition of pertussis symptoms, proper diagnosis using appropriate tools, and timely reporting of pertussis infections to surveillance bodies. Additional studies are needed to monitor trends of pertussis incidence after implementing the new vaccination schedule for adolescents.     

New adolescent vaccination recommendations and how to make them "stick"

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Multiple vaccination recommendations have recently targeted the adolescent age group. It is important for providers to be aware of all new recommendations, the rationale for the recommendations, and how to best implement recommendations for this age group. RECENT FINDINGS: The 11-12-year-old immunization platform now includes vaccination against tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis (tetanus, diphtheria and acellular pertussis or Tdap vaccine), meningococcal disease (conjugate meningococcal vaccine), human papillomavirus (for females), and a second varicella vaccination for those who have received one vaccination and have not had disease. Any missing vaccinations should be updated at this time. Many strategies exist to improve adherence to adolescent recommendations; the school mandate is an important yet controversial strategy that is being hotly debated in the literature. SUMMARY: There are many exciting, new vaccines for adolescents. It is important to improve vaccination coverage within the adolescent age group. Immunization against disease has previously been viewed as a primarily childhood issue, yet with ever-evolving technology and the need to vaccinate against diseases affecting all ages, vaccination strategies for adolescents need to be reviewed and improved. Mandates, when initiated with care, are one of the most effective implementation strategies for adolescents.     

The epidemiology of pertussis: a comparison of the epidemiology of the disease pertussis with the epidemiology of Bordetella pertussis infection

In the prevaccine era pertussis epidemics followed a cyclic pattern, with peaks every 2 to 5 years. With the marked reduction of pertussis by vaccination, the same cyclic pattern still occurs. Studies relating to reported pertussis and Bordetella pertussis infection have been reviewed and analyzed. The increase in reported pertussis over the last 2 decades is mainly due to a greater awareness of pertussis and perhaps to the use of several less efficacious vaccines. Studies of prolonged cough illnesses in adolescents and adults reveal that 13% to 20% are a result of B pertussis infection. Serologic studies suggest that the rate of B pertussis infection in adolescents and adults is approximately 2.0% per year. The rate of cough illnesses (pertussis) caused by B pertussis infection in adolescents and adults is between 370 and 1500 per 100,000 population. These data suggest that there are between approximately 800,000 and 3.3 million cases per year in the United States. The coming availability of adolescent- and adult-formulated diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccines for adolescents and adults and their widespread use should reduce the reservoir of B pertussis disease. It is suggested that a universal program of adolescent and adult boosters would decrease the circulation of B pertussis in these age groups and possibly could lead to the elimination of the organism from the population.     

Prevention of pertussis among adolescents: recommendations for use of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine

The purpose of this statement is to provide the rationale and recommendations for adolescent use of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccines. Despite universal immunization of children with multiple doses of pediatric diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccine, pertussis remains endemic with a steady increase in the number of reported cases. Two peaks in the incidence of pertussis occur in pediatric patients: infants younger than 6 months of age who are inadequately protected by the current immunization schedule and adolescents 11 through 18 years of age whose vaccine-induced immunity has waned. Significant medical and public health resources are being consumed in postexposure management of adolescent cases, contacts, and outbreaks with little beneficial effect on individuals or the epidemiology of disease. Two Tdap products were licensed in 2005 for use in people 10 through 18 years of age (Boostrix) and 11 through 64 years of age (Adacel). The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends the following: 1. Adolescents 11 to 18 years of age should receive a single dose of Tdap instead of tetanus and diphtheria toxoids (Td) vaccine for booster immunization. The preferred age for Tdap immunization is 11 to 12 years. 2. Adolescents 11 to 18 years of age who have received Td but not Tdap are encouraged to receive a single dose of Tdap. An interval of at least 5 years between Td and Tdap is suggested to reduce the risk of local and systemic reactions; however, intervals of less than 5 years can be used, particularly in settings of increased risk of acquiring pertussis, having complicated disease, or transmitting infection to vulnerable contacts. Data support acceptable safety with an interval as short as approximately 2 years. 3. Tdap and tetravalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MCV4 [Menactra]) should be administered during the same visit if both vaccines are indicated. If this is not feasible, MCV4 and Tdap can be administered using either sequence. When not administered simultaneously, the American Academy of Pediatrics suggests a minimum interval of 1 month between vaccines. The rationale for this strategy is to provide direct protection of immunized adolescents. With implementation of vaccine recommendations, indirect benefitalso is likely to extend to unimmunized peers and other age groups. The strategy of universal Tdap immunization at 11 to 12 years of age is cost-effective.     

Adult formulation of a five component acellular pertussis vaccine combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and inactivated poliovirus vaccine is safe and immunogenic in adolescents and adults

BACKGROUND: Pertussis is increasingly recognized as an important cause of cough illness in adolescents and adults. PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and antibody response to a single dose of an adult formulation of a five component (pertussis toxoid, filamentous hemagglutinin, pertactin, fimbriae 2 and 3) acellular pertussis vaccine (aP) combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids (TdaP) and inactivated poliovirus vaccine (TdaP-IPV) in adolescents and adults and to assess the response to a second dose of the acellular pertussis vaccine in a subset of the adults. POPULATION AND SETTING: The study addressed 1207 healthy participants (736 adults and 466 adolescents) recruited in five Canadian communities. STUDY DESIGN: In a randomized, observer-blind, controlled clinical trial, adult participants received Td followed at a separate visit by aP, TdaP followed by IPV or TdaP-IPV; adolescents received Td-IPV followed at a separate visit by aP or TdaP-IPV. A subgroup of adults was given a booster of aP 1 month after TdaP. OUTCOME MEASURES: Antibody titers measured before and 1 month after each immunization; adverse events enumerated at 24 h, 72 h and 8 to 10 days. RESULTS: The aP vaccine given by itself was associated with adverse events less frequently than were Td, Td-IPV, TdaP or TdaP-IPV vaccines, but reaction rates did not differ significantly among the latter products. The antibody response against Bordetella pertussis antigens was vigorous in all groups, although adults given the TdaP-IPV vaccine had lower antibody titers against filamentous hemagglutinin, pertactin, diphtheria and tetanus antibodies than those given TdaP vaccine. Similarly adolescents given TdaP-IPV had lower antibody titers against pertussis toxin, filamentous hemagglutinin, fimbriae and agglutinins than those given Td-IPV and aP alone. A second dose of acellular pertussis vaccine was not associated with increased adverse events in adults but elicited increased antibody titers over that achieved by a single dose only against pertussis toxin. CONCLUSIONS: This adult formulation five component aP vaccine given as TdaP-IPV is safe and immunogenic in adolescents and adults and is a candidate vaccine for adolescent and adult immunization programs.     

Antibody response to Bordetella pertussis antigens after immunization with American and Canadian whole-cell vaccines.

Because of apparent differences in the incidence and epidemiology of pertussis in the United States and Canada, we measured the antibody response to four Bordetella pertussis antigens and to a whole-bacteria preparation in children immunized with American and Canadian whole-cell pertussis vaccines. All infants received combined pertussis, tetanus, and diphtheria vaccines from one of two American manufacturers or a single Canadian manufacturer. The Canadian children received either oral poliomyelitis vaccine, inactivated poliomyelitis vaccine as a separate injection, or a product that combined inactivated poliomyelitis vaccine with diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis components. The Canadian trivalent diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis vaccine given with oral poliovirus vaccine induced lower anti-pertussis toxin antibody titers than did the American vaccines (p < or = to 0.05) but higher antifimbriae and anti-69-kilodalton outer-membrane protein (pertactin) antibody titers (p < or = to 0.02). Canadian children immunized with inactivated poliomyelitis vaccine either as a separate injection or as a combined diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis vaccine had consistently lower pertussis antibody titers than did those who received oral poliomyelitis vaccine (p < or = 0.001). We conclude that there is a wide range of antibody responses to B. pertussis antigens after immunization with various whole-cell pertussis vaccines, and that these responses may be influenced by concurrent administration of other vaccines.     

Safety and immunogenicity of a nonavalent pneumococcal vaccine conjugated to CRM197 administered simultaneously but in a separate syringe with diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccines in Gambian infants

BACKGROUND: Unrelenting high morbidity and mortality have mandated that immunogenic vaccines be used to combat pneumococcal disease in infants. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a nonavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine and the antigenic interaction when administered simultaneously with diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccines. METHODS: Two hundred seven infants were randomized to receive three doses of either nonavalent protein conjugate pneumococcal vaccine (PnCV) or inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) at 2, 3 and 4 months of age with routine Expanded Program of Immunization vaccines as scheduled. Vaccinees were visited on Days 1, 2 and 7 to observe local and systemic adverse reactions. Blood was drawn before the first dose and 1 month after the third dose. Antibody concentrations in sera were measured by standardized enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Nasopharyngeal carriage of pneumococci was tested at 5 and 9 months of age. RESULTS: No serious reactions were observed. Local induration and tenderness were observed more commonly at the site of administration of diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccines than at the site of administration of IPV or PnCV. Between 79 and 91% achieved >1 microg/ml antibody against specific pneumococcal serotypes. Antibody responses to diphtheria and pertussis antigens were similar in both groups; however, antibody response to tetanus toxoid was significantly lower in infants who received PnCV (geometric mean concentration, 11.1 vs. 17.4; P < 0.001). Nasopharyngeal carriage in PnCV-vaccinated children was reduced but not significantly different from those vaccinated with IPV. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous administration of PnCV with Expanded Program of Immunization vaccines is safe and immunogenic. immune response to the composite antigens is likely to confer protection.     

New, and some not-so-new, vaccines for adolescents and diseases they prevent

Adolescents in the United States now have the opportunity to receive new vaccines that prevent invasive meningococcal infections, pertussis (whooping cough), and cervical cancer. Except for their potential to cause serious illness, these infections could not be more different. Their incidence ranges from extremely low to quite high. Early clinical manifestations of infection range from none to life-threatening illness. Two of the vaccines are similar to those already in use, whereas 1 is completely new. In conjunction with the 4 vaccines previously recommended for adolescents (the tetanus and diphtheria booster, hepatitis B, measles-mumps-rubella, and varicella), the 3 new vaccines (meningococcal, human papillomavirus, and the tetanus-diphtheria-pertussis booster [which replaced the tetanus-diphtheria booster]) bring the number recommended for adolescents to 6. In this article, we describe key characteristics of the 3 new vaccines and infections they were designed to prevent. We also briefly discuss other vaccines recommended for all adolescents who have not already received them and new vaccines that are still under development.     

Adverse effects and sero-responses to an acellular pertussis/diphtheria/tetanus vaccine when combined with Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine in an accelerated schedule

Acellular pertussis vaccines provide protection against pertussis with few adverse effects. Differences in the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of available pertussis vaccines may be influenced by the immunisation schedule employed. We assessed responses to an acellular pertussis, diphtheria, tetanus vaccine mixed with Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccine, (PRP-T) given at age 2, 3 and 4 months. Parents kept a symptom diary for 3 days after each immunisation. Antibodies to diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis toxin and filamentous haemagglutinin were measured by enzyme immunoassay at 2 and 5 months. Results were compared with historical controls who received a combination whole-cell pertussis, diphtheria, tetanus/PRP-T vaccine in the same schedule. A total of 262 infants were recruited, of whom 251 were fully evaluated after three doses of vaccine. Systemic and most local reactions were less frequent following the acellular combination. Fever ≥38°C was reported after only 0.6% of doses. Redness or swelling ≥2.5 cm were unusual after the first two doses (2–5%), but rates rose to 13% after the third dose. Antibody responses to diphtheria and tetanus toxoids were lower, while those to pertussis antigens were higher, more uniform and less attenuated by pre-immunisation antibody than in infants who received the whole-cell combination. All infants achieved protective antibody titres of at least 0.1 IU/ml for diphtheria and 0.01 IU/ml for tetanus. Conclusion The acellular combination vaccine was immunogenic for diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis components and was associated with low rates of fever following immunisation. Received: 9 June 1998 / Accepted: 2 November 1998     

How soon after a prior tetanus-diphtheria vaccination can one give adult formulation tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccine?

BACKGROUND: Adult formulation tetanus and diphtheria toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccines (Tdap) have been developed to prevent pertussis in adolescents and adults. There are concerns that unacceptable rates of severe injection site reactions, including Arthus-type reactions might occur if Tdap is administered too soon after a previous tetanus and diphtheria toxoid-containing vaccine formulated for infants and younger children (TD) or older children and adults (Td). METHODS: To evaluate whether adverse reactions after Tdap might be related to time since last receipt of TD/Td, we performed an open label, province-wide, clinical trial comparing the reactogenicity of Tdap given 18 months-9 years versus > or = 10 years after a previous TD/Td. RESULTS: Seven thousand one hundred fifty-six children and adolescents were enrolled in the study (464-963 subjects per cohort), and 7001 had documented dates of the previous immunization within the specified intervals; adverse event data were provided by 5931 (84.7%). No whole limb swelling, Arthus-like reactions or serious adverse events related to vaccination were reported. No differences in reports of fever were found by interval since last immunization. Injection site erythema and swelling were slightly and statistically significantly increased among those participants with most recent prior TD/Td. Compared with the 10-year interval group, the maximum increase for any other group was < or = 8.6% for any erythema, < or = 6% for erythema > 10 mm, < or = 10.3% for any swelling, < or = 6.9% for swelling > 10 mm, < or = 5.2% for any pain and < or = 3.7% for moderate/severe pain. CONCLUSION: Although there is a slight increase in injection site events with decreasing interval since a previous immunization, Tdap can be safely administered at intervals of > or = 18 months since a previous TD/Td vaccine.     

Acellular pertussis vaccine boosters combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoid boosters for adolescents: safety and immunogenicity assessment when preceded by different 5-dose DTaP/DTwP schedules

A sixth dose of tetanus, diphtheria, acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine in adolescents might produce a differing reactogenicity and/or immunogenicity response depending on the composition of the 5 prior doses of DTaP or DT-whole cell pertussis (DTwP) vaccine. Reactions and immune responses following receipt of the Sanofi Pasteur (Adacel) and GlaxoSmithKline (Boostrix) Tdap vaccines were assessed in 229 adolescents. No differences were observed for reactions to either Tdap vaccine regardless of the prior DTaP/DTwP vaccination history. Seroprotective levels and antibody concentrations were comparable regardless of prior DTaP/DTwP vaccine history. A sixth sequential dose of Tdap after 5 doses of DTaP appears safe and immunogenic.     

Diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis vaccine. A comparison of the immune response and adverse reactions to conventional and acellular pertussis components

Although the conventional Bordetella pertussis vaccine, which consists of killed whole organisms, has been shown to be effective in preventing disease, it has been associated with transient local and systemic reactions and may produce encephalopathy, though rarely. A new acellular pertussis vaccine containing partially purified protein antigens, filamentous hemagglutinin, and lymphocytosis-promoting factor hemagglutinin has been developed for use in Japan. We compared the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of conventional and acellular pertussis vaccine. Forty children aged 4 to 6 years and 40 children aged 18 to 24 months, all previously immunized at appropriate times with conventional diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccine, were enrolled. We randomly assigned children to receive either conventional pertussis vaccine or acellular pertussis vaccine in a double-blind fashion. The diphtheria and tetanus components in both preparations were identical. Equivalent rises in pertussis agglutinin titers and antibodies to filamentous hemagglutinin and lymphocytosis-promoting factor hemagglutinin were measured in both vaccine groups at both ages that we studied. However, reaction rates to the two vaccines in both age groups were strikingly different. Acellular pertussis vaccine was significantly less reactogenic for fever, pain, fretfulness, abnormal gait, and local reactions at the vaccine administration site. If studies in progressively younger children confirm its reduced reactogenicity and equal immunogenicity, and if large-scale trials indicate its efficacy, the acellular pertussis vaccine may be a more appropriate candidate than the current vaccine.     

Fifth vaccination with dipthteria, tetanus and acellular pertussis is beneficial in four- to six-year-olds

OBJECTIVE: Diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis serum antibody titers were assessed before a fifth dose of diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (DTaP) or diphtheria-tetanus-whole cell pertussis (DTwP) vaccination at age 4 to 6 years. METHODS: Healthy children who had participated in a series of National Institutes of Health-sponsored trials assessing DTwP and DTaP vaccines provided prevaccination sera before a fifth dose of DTwP or DTaP. The trial design was prospective, randomized and double blind. Diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis antibody titers were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Pertussis results are expressed in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay units/ml based on US Food and Drug Administration reference sera. Tetanus and diphtheria toxin concentrations are expressed in IU/ml with a WHO international reference sera as a standard. RESULTS: For diphtheria 100% of the children had antibody titers above the minimum protective level of 0.01 IU/ml and 86 to 100% (depending on prior vaccine product) had titers >0.1 IU/ml. However, only 0 to 40% of the children had antibody titers > or =1.0 IU/ml, a titer associated with more certain durable protection. For tetanus none of the children had an antibody titer below 0.01 IU/ml, and 93 to 100% had titers > or =0.1 IU/ml, a titer associated with more certain, durable protection. For pertussis the geometric mean concentrations of antibody before booster were uniformly very low, and the percentage of children exceeding the minimum detectable titer of antibody by 4-fold was also low. CONCLUSION: Before a 4- to 6-year-old booster, a large proportion of children have titers of antibody to diphtheria below the certain, durable protective level. Because serologic correlates and minimum protective titers of antibody to pertussis antigens have not been established, the relevance of the low titers determined in the current study is unknown but a potential concern.     

Antibodies to diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis in infants before and after immunization with DTP (Triple Antigen) vaccine

Objective : To determine antibody levels to the Australian manufactured combined diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis (DTP) vaccine (Triple Antigen, CSL Ltd) in infante before and after their primary immunization course.
Methodology : Serosurvey (antibody prevalence study) in two groups: infants aged 5-9 weeks who had not received any immunizations ( n = 25), and infants aged 7-10 months who had received two ( n = 25) or three immunizations ( n = 57) with DTP, sampled from infants attending the Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, either as inpatients or outpatients between February and April 1993. The immunization history for each infant was determined from hospital records, the parent-held child health record, or the local council or family doctor who immunized the infant.
Results : Enzyme immunoassay (EIA) of antibodies to diphtheria and tetanus showed all infants to have adequate protective levels after two or three vaccinations (£0.01 IU/mL). All subjects who had received all three DTP vaccinations had detectable antibody to at least one pertussis antigen. Antibodies to the pertussis antigens filamentous haemagglutinin and pertussigen (pertussis toxin) were comparable to levels determined for whole cell pertussis vaccines used elsewhere in the world. EIA-determined antibodies to pertussis agglutinogen type 2 and agglutinogen type 3 showed substantially higher geometric mean titres when results for pre-immunization and post-immunization subjects were compared.
Conclusions : These data show that the Australian manufactured DTP vaccine has immunogenic properties similar to those of vaccines used elsewhere, and that antibody concentrations following immunization are at levels consistent with efficacy.     

Booster vaccination and 1-year follow-up of 4–8-year-old children with a reduced-antigen-content dTpa-IPV vaccine

Reduced-antigen-content pertussis vaccines designed initially for booster vaccination of adolescents and adults can also be used to vaccinate pre-school age children. Combination vaccines, which reduce the number of administered injections, combine multiple antigens including inactivated poliovirus (IPV), which is recommended in this age group in some countries. This randomised, controlled study compared a combined diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-inactivated polio-containing booster vaccine, dTpa-IPV (Boostrix™ Polio, n = 822), to separately administered dTpa (Boostrix™) and IPV (IPV Mérieux™, n = 136) in 4–8-year-old children who had previously received four doses of DTPa. Additional serological assessment was performed 1 year after the booster dose. One month after vaccination, seroprotection/vaccine response rates were similar for both groups. At least 99.9% of the subjects had protective antibodies against diphtheria, tetanus and polio, and at least 90.1% had a vaccine response to pertussis antigens after dTpa-IPV. Reactogenicity of dTpa-IPV was comparable to dTpa + IPV. Fever and grade 3 loss of appetite occurred more commonly after dTpa-IPV, whereas swelling and grade 3 pain occurred more frequently after separately administered dTpa + IPV (P < 0.05 for all). However, 95% CIs overlapped in all cases. Large swelling reactions after dTpa-IPV occurred less commonly than have been reported after a fifth dose of DTPa. One year after the booster, 98.6% of the subjects tested continued to have protective antibodies against diphtheria, tetanus and polio, and at least 81.2% were seropositive for pertussis components. The reduced-antigen-content dTpa-IPV vaccine was immunogenic, well tolerated and safe in pre-school age children. It provides immunity against four diseases in a single injection, with the potential reactogenicity benefit of a reduced-antigen dose. Source of financial support: GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Rixensart, Belgium.     

Comparison of acellular and whole-cell pertussis-component DTP vaccines. A multicenter double-blind study in 4- to 6-year-old children

An acellular pertussis-component combined diphtheria and tetanus toxoids, and pertussis (APDT) vaccine adsorbed was compared with a licensed whole-cell pertussis-component combined diphtheria and tetanus toxoids, and pertussis (DTP) vaccine adsorbed for reactogenicity and immunogenicity when given as the fifth DTP immunization to eighty-two 4- to 6-year-old children. The reaction rates with both vaccines were low; APDT vaccine recipients had significantly less pain and warmth at the injection site than did DTP vaccine recipients. Antibody responses to pertussis antigens (lymphocytosis-promoting factor, filamentous hemagglutinin, and agglutinogens) and to diphtheria and tetanus toxoids were all brisk. The APDT vaccine recipients had a more marked response in antibodies to filamentous hemagglutinin and a less marked response in agglutinins than whole-cell vaccine recipients. On the day after immunization, both APDT and DTP vaccine recipients had an increase in mean leukocyte and neutrophil counts. This APDT vaccine is immunogenic and less reactogenic than a DTP vaccine with a whole-cell pertussis component when administered as a booster to 4- to 6-year-old children.     

Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of the component acellular pertussis vaccine produced by a combination of column purified pertussis toxin and filamentous haemagglutinin

This is the report on a prospective, single blind, comparative study of a component acellular pertussis vaccine produced by a combination of detoxified, column purified pertussis toxin (PT) and filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA) combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids (DTcaP) and the traditional acellular pertussis vaccine produced with essentially the same method as described by Sato with DT (DTaP) of the same manufacturer. A total of 616 infants and children received DTcaP and a total of 289 received DTaP. In all age groups for both vaccines values of serum antibodies to PT and FHA after two doses of the vaccines were comparable to those of convalescent sera. Incidences of systemic and local reactions were, in general, not greatly different between DTcaP and DTaP recipients. In Japan the use of traditional acellular vaccines replaced whole cell vaccines in 1981. Protective antigens of Bordetella pertussis have now been specified and thus component vaccines have become theoretically possible. This is the first component vaccine which has been developed in Japan. Several other component vaccines are now under investigation in the world.     

Diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis antibodies in 10-year-old children before and after a booster dose of three toxoids: implications for the timing of a booster dose

In an open study, 502 10-year-old children, who had received primary vaccination against diphtheria and tetanus in infancy and had varying histories of pertussis disease and vaccination, were vaccinated with diphtheria-tetanus vaccine (DT) alone or with the addition of 20 µg or 40 g of pertussis toxoid. Diphtheria toxin neutralising antibodies, pertussis toxin IgG and tetanus toxoid IgG antibodies were measured before and 1 month after the booster. All toxoids were highly immunogenic. In pertussis toxoid recipients, median levels of pertussis toxin IgG increased to 16.5 U/ml (DTaP20) and to 36 U/ml (DTaP40) in children with non-detectable (<1 U/ml) antibodies before vaccination and to >400 U/ml in children (both DTaP20 and DTaP40) with detectable antibodies before vaccination. A total of 60 children (12%) with non-detectable (<0.01 IU/ml) diphtheria antibodies and 36 children (7%) with non-detectable (<0.01 IU/ml) tetanus antibodies before the booster had lower median antibody concentrations post-vaccination than children with detectable antibodies before the booster (diphtheria: 5.12 vs. 20.48 IU/ml; tetanus: 4.0 vs. 10.0 IU/ml). There were no differences in diphtheria and tetanus antibodies after vaccination between children who did and did not receive pertussis toxoid. Conclusion:10-year-old children with non-detectable diphtheria and tetanus antibodies before the booster had lower post-vaccination antibodies than those with detectable antibodies before the booster indicating a poor immunological memory. Addition of pertussis toxoid to diphtheria-tetanus vaccine did not affect the antibody responses to diphtheria and tetanus toxoids when the three toxoids were combined as a booster. Even though immunity to diphtheria and tetanus was only estimated by surrogate markers (serum antitoxin antibodies) the results indicate that a lower age for the booster dose of diphtheria-tetanus vaccine or diphtheria-tetanus acellular pertussis vaccine should be considered.     

Assessment of Immune Response following Immunization with DTP/Td and MMR Vaccines in Children Treated for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Background: This study was performed to determine the antibody titers against diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis, and measles-mumps-rubella before and after re-vaccination in different periods of time in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) to provide a suitable vaccination schedule. Methods: Ninety patients with ALL were studied in three stages, including newly diagnosed patients, patients on maintenance therapy, and 1 to 12 months after cessation of therapy. Baseline antibody titers were assessed in all participants. Postimmunization antibody titers to DTP/Td and MMR vaccines were evaluated 3 weeks after vaccination. Results: Patients on maintenance therapy had considerable decreased in seropositivity rate; they achieved seroconversion rate of 100% for diphtheria and tetanus and of 71.4% for pertussis following DTP/Td vaccination. In patients after one month off therapy, the seroconversion rates for diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis were 71.4%, 80%, and 100%, respectively. The amounts of seroconversion in patients after 3 months off therapy were 66.5%, 80%, and 66.5% for measles, mumps, and rubella, respectively. In patients after 6 months off therapy, the seroconversion rates were 85.7% for diphtheria, 100% for pertussis and tetanus, 83.3% for mumps, 50% for rubella, and 41.6% for measles. Patients after 12 months off therapy achieved seroconversion rate of 100% for diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, and mumps, of 71.5% for rubella, and of 63.5% for measles. Conclusion: Administration of one dosage of DTP/Td vaccine during maintenance therapy and after cessation of therapy could be recommended, while one dosage of MMR vaccine at least three months after completion of therapy could be safe and beneficial.     

Economic evaluation of the 7-vaccine routine childhood immunization schedule in the United States, 2001

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the economic impact of the routine US childhood immunization schedule: diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis; tetanus and diphtheria toxoids; Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate; inactivated poliovirus; measles, mumps, and rubella; hepatitis B; and varicella vaccines. DESIGN: Decision tree-based analysis was conducted using population-based vaccination coverage, published vaccine efficacies, historical data on disease incidence before vaccination, and disease incidence reported for 1995-2001. Costs were estimated using the direct cost and societal (direct and indirect costs) perspectives. Program costs included vaccine, administration, vaccine-associated adverse events, and parent travel and time lost. All costs were inflated to 2001 US dollars, and all costs and benefits in the future were discounted at a 3% annual rate. PARTICIPANTS: A hypothetical 2001 US birth cohort of 3,803,295 infants was followed up from birth through death. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Net present value (net savings) and benefit-cost ratios of routine immunization. RESULTS: Routine childhood immunization with the 7 vaccines was cost saving from the direct cost and societal perspectives, with net savings of 9.9 billion dollars and 43.3 billion dollars, respectively. Without routine vaccination, direct and societal costs of diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, H influenzae type b, poliomyelitis, measles, mumps, rubella, congenital rubella syndrome, hepatitis B, and varicella would be 12.3 billion dollars and 46.6 billion dollars, respectively. Direct and societal costs for the vaccination program were an estimated 2.3 billion dollars and 2.8 billion dollars, respectively. Direct and societal benefit-cost ratios for routine childhood vaccination were 5.3 and 16.5, respectively. CONCLUSION: Regardless of the perspective, the current routine childhood immunization schedule results in substantial cost savings.