Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy versus total vaginal mesh for vault prolapse; comparison of cohorts

The surgical treatment of vaginal vault prolapse can either be performed by the vaginal or the abdominal (laparoscopic) route. The objective of this study was to compare the laparoscopic sacral colpopexy (LSC) and total vaginal mesh (TVM) for vaginal vault prolapse. This study compared a prospective cohort of LSC with bone-anchor fixation and mesh limited to the apex to a prospective cohort of TVM as treatment modalities in patients with a symptomatic vaginal vault prolapse (pelvic organ prolapse-quantification (POP-Q) point C?≥??3). Primary outcome was failure in the apical compartment after 6 month follow-up, defined as POP-Q stage?≥?II with prolapse complaints or re-treatment in apical compartment. Based on an overall failure in all compartments of 23 % in the LSC group and 57 % in the TVM group, 29 patients would be needed in each group with a power of 80 % and alpha 0.05. Ninety-seven women were included, 45 LSC and 52 TVM. The failure rate of symptomatic vault prolapse was 1 (2 %) in each group (p?=?0.99). The failure rate (POP stage?≥?II) in any compartment was 23 (51 %) in the LSC group and 11 (21 %) in the TVM group (p?=?0.002). Each technique had its own type of complications. Short-term failure rates in the apical compartment after TVM and LSC were similar. In case of anterior or posterior prolapsed, additional mesh insertion or additional vaginal colporrhaphy is indicated in LSC surgery.     

Risk factors of surgical failure following sacrospinous colpopexy for the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse

Purpose

Trans-vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy is one of the surgical procedures used to repair varying degrees of vaginal vault and uterovaginal prolapse. The purpose of this study is to analyse the potential risk factors of surgical failure following sacrospinous colpopexy.

Methods

A retrospective study of 114 women who underwent unilateral sacrospinous colpopexy at Jordan University Hospital from January 2005 to January 2008 were included. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics and concomitant pelvic organ prolapse surgery were assessed. The patients were evaluated at 6 weeks, and every 6 months thereafter. Twelve (11 %) had recurrent apical (vaginal cuff) prolapse, 26 (23 %) had recurrent prolapse at any compartment were compared with those who had successful surgery. Univariate and logistic regression analyses were used to assess the independent prognostic values of the variables associated with surgical failure.

Results

After a mean follow-up of 40 months, the statistically significant predictors of surgical failure included the presence of advanced pre-operative stages of prolapse (stages III and IV), the more distally located points Ba, Bp and C and a lack of mesh augmentation of the anterior vaginal wall during surgery (P = 0.01, 0.027, 0.024, 0.034 and 0.006, respectively). However, a history of prior vaginal repair, the more distally located point Ba and a lack of anterior vaginal wall mesh augmentation were defined as independent predictive variables based on logistic regression analyses (P = 0.04, 0.005 and 0.046, respectively).

Conclusions

The presence of advanced anterior vaginal wall prolapse, prior vaginal repair and a lack of mesh augmentation of the anterior compartment are significant risk factors for the surgical failure of sacrospinous suspension surgery.     

Vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy using the Capio suture-capturing device versus traditional technique: feasibility and outcome

Purpose

This study compares the feasibility and outcome of sacrospinous colpopexy for treating vaginal vault prolapse (VVP) performed by either the traditional technique or a simplified procedure using the Capio? suture-capturing device.

Materials and methods

Eighty-six patients with VVP were included in the study. Forty-two patients were treated by traditional sacrospinous colpopexy (TSC group) and 44 patients were treated by the modified technique using the Capio device (CSC group). Additional procedures were performed to restore concomitant pelvic floor defects.

Results

The mean (±SD) total operative time was significantly lower in the CSC group (71.7 ± 24.5 min) than in the TSC group (105.5 ± 31.5 min; p < 0.001); the intraoperative blood loss was higher in the TSC group than in the CSC group. In the CSC group, the mean operative time required to perform sacrospinous colpopexy was 21.4 ± 3.2 min. In patients who underwent only sacrospinous colpopexy, the time required to perform surgery was significantly lower in the CSC group (20.9 ± 3.3 min) than in the TSC group (39.1 ± 5.2 min; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of surgical complications between the two study groups. The objective and subjective success rates at 3-year follow-up were 88.1 and 92.9 % in the TSC group while in the CSC group they were 86.4 and 92.9 %.

Conclusion

The modified technique of sacrospinous ligament fixation using the Capio device reduces the operative time and blood loss when compared to the traditional technique.     

Anterior approach sacrospinous colpopexy in a patient with vaginal vault prolapse, stress urinary incontinence and cystocoele with lateral defect

We present a case of vaginal vault prolapse after hysterectomy associated with cystocoele with central and lateral defect and stress urinary incontinence, that was treated surgically with employment of sacrospinous colpopexy through anterior approach (from paravesical space), combined with anterior colporrhaphy by double TOT approach method (that is a butterfly-shaped polipropylen mesh, which arms were carried through upper and lower parts of obturator foramens by tension-free method). There were no postoperative complications. A control examination at 1 and 3 months after the operation showed maintenance of normal anatomic relations, which were obtained as a result of repair, total control of urinary continence and full patient's satisfaction from the operation.     

Outcome after anterior vaginal prolapse repair: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES: To report 1-year outcomes of a randomized controlled trial comparing polypropylene mesh-reinforced anterior vaginal prolapse repair with anterior colporrhaphy. METHODS: Seventy-six patients with stage II or greater anterior vaginal prolapse were randomly assigned to either colporrhaphy or polypropylene mesh repair. The primary outcome was recurrent stage II anterior vaginal prolapse, and secondary outcomes were effects on quality of life and sexual symptom scores, operative time, blood loss, length of hospitalization, and adverse events. RESULTS: Thirty-eight women had anterior colporrhaphy, and 37 had polypropylene mesh repair. One patient allocated to mesh repair withdrew from the study before surgery. Clinical and demographic data did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups. One year after surgery, optimal and satisfactory anterior vaginal support were obtained in 21 of 38 (55%) of the colporrhaphy group and 33 of 38 (87%) of the mesh group (P=.005). Patients in both groups reported less bother after surgery in both prolapse and urinary symptoms. The rates of de novo dyspareunia were 4 of 26 (16%) and 2 of 23 (9%) in the colporrhaphy and mesh groups, respectively. Two of 37 (5%) patients had vaginal mesh extrusion. Nine anterior colporrhaphy patients would have to have recurrent anterior vaginal prolapse to prevent one vaginal mesh extrusion. Neither serious adverse events nor deaths occurred in either group. CONCLUSION: Anterior vaginal prolapse repair with polypropylene mesh reinforcement offers lower anatomic recurrence than anterior colporrhaphy at one year. However, quality of life and sexual symptoms scores improved in both groups.     

Polypropylene Mesh for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery

During the past 2 years, there has been a dramatic reduction in the employment of transvaginal mesh in the United States and simultaneously a doubling in the number of sacral colpopexies performed annually. While sacral colpopexy has strong Level 1 evidence supporting its use for posthysterectomy prolapse, the evidence supporting sacral colpopexy in those with uterine prolapse is limited. Hysterectomy performed at sacral colpopexy for uterine prolapse results in a fourfold increase in rate of mesh exposure compared with sacral colpopexy for posthysterectomy prolapse. The data supporting subtotal hysterectomy at sacral colpopexy and hysterosacropexy for uterine prolapse are Level 3 and derived from very limited numbers. With the withdrawal of commercial transvaginal polypropylene mesh products from the market, the Level 1 evidence relating to these products is derived from only 242 cases and demonstrate only an objective advantage over native tissue repairs in the anterior vaginal compartment. No Level 1 data are available to support transvaginal polypropylene mesh in multicompartment or posterior compartment vaginal prolapse.     

Abdominal sacral colpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: a prospective randomized study

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the abdominal sacral colpopexy and vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy in the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. STUDY DESIGN: Ninety-five women with vaginal vault prolapse were allocated randomly to sacral colpopexy (47 women) or sacrospinous colpopexy (48 women). Primary outcome measurements include subjective, objective, and patient-determined success rates. Secondary outcomes include the impact on bowel, bladder, and sexual function, cost, and quality of life. RESULTS: Two years after the operation (range, 6-60 months), the subjective success rate was 94% in the abdominal and 91% in the vaginal group (P=.19). The objective success rate was 76% in the abdominal group and 69% in the vaginal group (P=.48). The abdominal approach was associated with a longer operating time, a slower return to activities of daily living, and a greater cost than the sacrospinous colpopexy (P<.01). Both surgeries significantly improved the patient's quality of life (P<.05). CONCLUSION: Abdominal sacral colpopexy and vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy are both highly effective in the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse.     

Transvaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for marked uterovaginal and vault prolapse.

OBJECTIVE: The transvaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation technique was used as part of the vaginal repair procedure for marked uterovaginal prolapse, and in the treatment of vault prolapse. METHOD: Out of the 26 women treated with sacrospinous ligament suspension of the vaginal vault, 23 had marked uterovaginal prolapse and three had vault prolapse following hysterectomy. Patients with vault prolapse underwent posterior vaginal repair, obliteration of the enterocele sac and sacrospinous colpopexy. Patients with marked uterovaginal prolapse underwent vaginal hysterectomy with high ligation of the enterocele sac, anterior and posterior vaginal repair, and sacrospinous colpopexy. Bilateral salpingoopherectomy was added to the procedure in five patients. All patients were examined 6 weeks after the operation and, subsequently, on an annual basis. The mean follow-up period was 2.6 years (1-5 years). RESULTS: Out of the three patients with previous vault prolapse, none had recurrences. Out of the 23 patients with previous marked uterovaginal prolapse, only two had small cystocele, and one had small enterocele at 36 months following the operation. These patients were asymptomatic and did not need an operation. Vaginal vault prolapse was not observed in any of these patients. Two women had post-operative urinary tract infection and five had buttock discomfort, which subsided after 2 months. No other intra- or post-operative complications occurred. CONCLUSION: Transvaginal sacrospinous colpopexy can be performed together with vaginal hysterectomy, and anterior and posterior vaginal wall repair in patients with marked uterovaginal prolapse because of its high success in avoiding possible vault prolapse, and low intra- and post-operative complication rates.     

Long-term outcome of vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for marked uterovaginal and vault prolapse

BACKGROUND: This study was carried out to evaluate the safety and long-term outcome of sacrospinous colpopexy in marked genital prolapse. SETTING: Gynaecology Department, Benenden Hospital, Kent, UK. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted between September 1993 and May 2000 on 305 women who underwent transvaginal sacrospinous colpopexy. The indications for surgery were marked vault prolapse in 43% and uterovaginal prolapse or enterocele in 57%. Patient follow up was at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year and then annually. Data was collected prospectively at the time of initial recruitment, during hospital stay and at the end of each follow up visit. RESULTS: Hysterectomy was performed in 117 patients and anterior colporrhaphy in 182. The mean operative time for the entire surgery was 65.6 min (S.D. 27.4, range 20-160 min) and estimated blood loss was 81.8 ml (S.D. 92, range 20-800 ml). After a mean follow up period of 57 months (range 24-84), vault support was maintained in 96%; recurrent vault prolapse occurred in 12 patients (4%) and the mean vaginal length at 1 and 5 years of follow up was 8+/-0.9 and 7.8+/-1.2 cm. Symptomatic cystocele occurred in 15 patients (5%). There were six recurrences of rectocele (2%) and there was no enterocele recurrence. Sexual function was maintained in all sexually active women and 43% reported improvement in sexual function. Out of 14 women who complained of fecal incontinence, 10 (71%) reported cure and 3 (21%) improved after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy is associated with a high long-term success rate in correcting upper genital prolapse.     

Sacrospinous colpopexy at vaginal hysterectomy: method, results and follow up in 75 patients.

This study reviews our experience with sacrospinous colpopexy done at the time of vaginal hysterectomy over a period of 3 years, and discusses the indications, outcome and safety of the technique. Between January 1996 and December 1998, 75 patients had sacrospinous colpopexy at the time of vaginal hysterectomy. The mean age of patients was 57.1 years. Simultaneous bilateral vaginal oophorectomy was done in 36 patients, anterior colporrhaphy in 56, and posterior colporrhaphy in 24. All patients underwent perineorrhaphy. Dissection and obliteration of the enterocoele sac was performed whenever encountered. Patients were seen at 2, 6 and 12 months following surgery and then yearly thereafter. The mean operative time was 85 minutes, mean uterine weight was 101 grams and mean blood loss was 137 ml. The mean follow-up period was 15 months. The vaginal vault remained well supported in 96.7%, with recurrent cystocoele in six patients (9.8%), recurrent rectocoele in 1.3%, and shortvagina in 3.3%. At 1-year follow up, 28% of those who were sexually active prior to surgery reported an improvement in sexual function. When dealing with uterovaginal prolapse, sacrospinous colpopexy performed at the time of vaginal hysterectomy is an effective treatment option for vaginal vault support.     

Transvaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault and complete genital prolapse in aged women.

Twenty-five women (mean age 72.8 years) with massive eversion of the vagina were treated with transvaginal sacrospinous ligament colpopexy between 1986 and 1990. Nine of them had a posthysterectomy vaginal prolapse; 16 had complete genital prolapse and coincident vaginal hysterectomy was performed. The operation was performed under spinal anesthesia in all cases except one with general anesthesia. Simultaneous anterior colporrhaphy was done in 88%, repair of enterocele in 72% and posterior colpoperineorrhaphy in 88% of all cases. There were no intra- or post-operative complications. Vaginal vault prolapse did not recur during a mean follow-up period of 2.8 years in 22 cases. Three patients developed asymptomatic cystocele or enterocele, and 5 (23%) women had a curtailed vagina. Sacrospinous ligament colpopexy under regional anesthesia is an effective and suitable operation for aged women with vaginal vault and complete genital prolapse. The operation is also a safe and fairly simple procedure if the anatomic relationship of the nearby structures is known.     

Vaginal repair with mesh versus colporrhaphy for prolapse: a randomised controlled trial

Objective  To compare vaginal repair augmented by mesh with traditional colporrhaphy for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
Design  Prospective randomised controlled trial.
Setting  Tertiary teaching hospital.
Population  One hundred and thirty-nine women with stage ≥2 prolapse according to the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system requiring both anterior and posterior compartment repair.
Methods  Subjects were randomised to anterior and posterior vaginal repair with mesh augmentation (mesh group, n  = 69) or traditional anterior and posterior colporrhaphy (no mesh group, n  = 70).
Main outcome measures  The primary outcome was the absence of POP-Q stage ≥2 prolapse at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were symptoms, quality-of-life outcomes and satisfaction with surgery. Complications were also reported.
Results  For subjects attending the 12-month review, success in the mesh group was 81.0% (51 of 63 subjects) compared with 65.6% (40/61) in the no mesh group and was not significantly different ( P -value = 0.07). A high level of satisfaction with surgery and improvements in symptoms and quality-of-life data were observed at 12 months compared to baseline in both groups, but there was no significant difference in these outcomes between the two groups. Vaginal mesh exposure occurred in four women in the mesh group (5.6%). De novo dyspareunia was reported by five of 30 (16.7%) sexually active women in the mesh group and five of 33 (15.2%) in the no mesh group at 12 months.
Conclusion  In this study, vaginal surgery augmented by mesh did not result in significantly less recurrent prolapse than traditional colporrhaphy 12 months following surgery.     

Vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy and perineorrhaphy for faecal incontinence: preliminary report

Objective: To review our experience with vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy combined with perineorraphy performed for patients with genital prolapse who concomitantly suffered from faecal incontinence (FI). Setting: Gynaecology Department, Benenden Hospital, Benenden, Kent, UK. Subjects and methods: Between January 1997 and December 2001, 16 patients presented with symptoms of genital prolapse and faecal incontinence. Eleven out of the 16 patients (69%) had anorectal physiological tests and endoanal ultrasound performed before surgery. All patients had sacrospinous colpopexy and perineorraphy. Simultaneous vaginal hysterectomy was performed in two patients and anterior colporrhaphy in six patients. Results: The mean age was 60 years and median parity was 2. The mean operative time was 62 min (range 35–100) and the mean blood loss was 60 ml (range 30–160). The mean follow-up period was 37 months (6–65). Thirteen patients (81%) reported no faecal incontinence after surgery, and two patients (12.5%) reported improvement. One patient (6.5%) had no improvement in her symptom of faecal incontinence after surgery. None of the patients had recurrence of genital prolapse during follow up. Conclusion: Sacrospinous colpopexy combined with perineorraphy can help to cure symptoms of faecal incontinence associated with genital prolapse. The possible mechanisms for such a favourable result are discussed.     

Bilateral transvaginal sacrospinous colpopexy: Preliminary experience

OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to determine how often a transvaginal sacrospinous colpopexy procedure can be done bilaterally. STUDY DESIGN: Between August 1993 and July 1996, 66 patients were prospectively evaluated for uterine prolapse (19 patients) and posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse (47 patients). Twenty-six patients (25 with posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse) underwent an abdominal sacral colpopexy. The remaining 40 patients (18 with uterine prolapse, 22 with posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse) were preoperatively and intraoperatively assessed for a bilateral sacrospinous colpopexy. All patients with uterine prolapse underwent hysterectomy. RESULTS: In 10 of the 18 (56%) patients with uterine prolapse and in 16 of the 22 (73%) patients with posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse, bilateral suspension to the sacrospinous ligament was carried out. Follow-up has ranged from 6 to 40 months, and no recurrent vaginal cuff prolapses have been detected in any patients. In 3 patients, however, all in the bilateral fixation categories, distention cystoceles have developed; one patient has undergone a successful anterior colporrhaphy. CONCLUSIONS: The bilateral suspension is different from the unilateral suspension in that the former requires significant intraoperative judgment in its feasibility and in maintaining the width of the vaginal cuff to allow a bilateral suspension without tension. A bilateral fixation appears more attainable in a patient with posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse than in one with uterine prolapse.(Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:62)     

Transvaginal repair of anterior and posterior compartment prolapse with Atrium polypropylene mesh

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of a new technique using Atrium polypropylene mesh (Atrium, Hudson, New Hampshire, USA) as an overlay graft for repair of large or recurrent anterior and posterior compartment prolapse. DESIGN: A retrospective review of women who had vaginal prolapse surgery with Atrium mesh reinforcement. SETTING: Tertiary referral urogynaecology unit in Australia. POPULATION: Forty-seven women where mesh was placed under the bladder base with lateral extensions onto the pelvic sidewall, 33 women where a Y-shaped mesh was placed from the sacrospinous ligaments to the perineal body and 17 women who had mesh placement in both compartments. METHODS: Women were assessed by site-specific vaginal examination pre-operatively and post-operatively at six weeks, six months and two years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All complications. Rate of recurrent prolapse assessed by the Baden-Walker halfway classification system. RESULTS: Mean follow up was 29 months (range 6 to 52). Four of 64 women with anterior mesh placement (6%) developed a grade 2 asymptomatic cystocele. Five women (5%) required further surgery for recurrent prolapse at a non-mesh site. Erosion occurred in nine women (9%). Three healed after intravaginal oestrogen cream, five after excision of exposed mesh and vaginal closure and one woman also had surgical closure of a rectovaginal fistula. The risk of mesh erosion decreased over the study period. Urinary, coital and bowel symptoms were significantly improved following surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This technique shows promise in correcting pelvic organ prolapse. Vaginal mesh erosion is the most common complication and is related to surgical experience.     

Repair of recurrent vaginal vault prolapse using sacrospinous ligament fixation with mesh interposition and reinforcement

OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to study the efficacy of performing the repeated sacrospinous ligament fixation with mesh interposition and reinforcement in women with recurrent vaginal vault prolapse. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen consecutive patients with symptomatic severe vaginal vault or uterus prolapse after previous sacrospinous ligament fixation were enrolled. The sacrospinous ligament fixation was performed with a mesh interposition between sacrospinous ligament complex and vaginal apex. The mesh was extended to anterior and posterior vaginal wall for the repair of concurrent cystocele and rectocele, if indicated. The surgical results and complications were evaluated. The prolapse evaluation was performed according to International Continence Society (ICS) ordinal stages of pelvic organ prolapse. RESULTS: The mean age was 55 years. The mean follow-up was 2.9 years (range 1.0-5.5 years). Repeated sacrospinous ligament fixation was performed for all patients. Eleven were performed unilaterally to the right and four to the left. The average time for sacrospinous fixation was 20 min. The average blood loss for sacrospinous fixation was 75 ml. No major complication except one accidental rectotomy was observed. It was repaired intraoperatively without sequel. The concurrent pelvic surgeries included vaginal total hysterectomies, anterior colporrhaphies, posterior colporrhaphies, and tension-free vaginal tape procedures. No recurrence of apical prolapse was observed. However, two patients developed stage I prolapse on anterior vaginal wall (cystocele) and required no further repair. Minor postoperative complications were observed. CONCLUSION: Repeated sacrospinous ligament fixation with mesh interposition and reinforcement is a safe and effective procedure for the correction of recurrent vault prolapse. The extended implanted mesh can be used for the repair of concurrent cystorectocele effectively. A long-term follow-up is necessary to detect any late complication.     

Infracoccygeal sacropexy reinforced with posterior mesh interposition for apical and posterior compartment prolapse

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy, safety and functional outcome of infracoccygeal sacropexy reinforced with posterior mesh interposition performed alone or in combination with the implantation of other prosthetic materials for prolapse repair. STUDY DESIGN: Seventy-two patients requiring prolapse repair for apical and/or posterior compartment prolapse, operated between March 2002 and September 2005. Patients underwent physical examination for prolapse assessment according to the international pelvic organ prolapse staging system and were evaluated for objective and subjective prolapse symptoms pre- and post-operatively. Objective success was defined by the midline posterior vaginal wall at stage 0 or 1, while subjective success was defined by a score above or equal to 7.5 measured on a visual analogue scale (0, very disappointed; 10, very satisfied). Follow-up was done at 6 weeks, 6 months and then once a year. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients with a mean age of 65 years were followed-up with a median of 26.3 months (range 10-43). Stages 3 and 4 represented 65.3% of all apical and/or posterior compartment prolapse. Fifty-nine patients had a concomitant anterior prolapse repair. Both objective and subjective success rates were 97.2%. All subjective prolapse symptoms decreased after surgery. The only intraoperative complication was one rectal injury. Vaginal erosion rate was 13.9% and mesh infection rate was 4.2%. Vaginal erosions statistically occurred less often with monofilament polypropylene (5.7%, 2/35) than with multifilament polypropylene (13.6%, 3/22) or polyester (33.3%, 5/15) (p<.04). CONCLUSION: Infracoccygeal sacropexy reinforced with posterior mesh interposition provides effective and promising results in correcting apical and/or posterior compartment prolapse. Analysis of long-term success rates and comparison with previously accepted surgical procedures are required to determine the place of this procedure in the strategy of genital prolapse repair.     

Combined anterior vaginal wall mesh with sacrospinous ligament fixation or with posterior intravaginal slingplasty for uterovaginal or vaginal vault prolapse

Objective

To evaluate outcomes of anterior vaginal wall mesh augmentation with concomitant sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) or with concomitant posterior intravaginal slingplasty (IVS) for uterovaginal or vaginal vault prolapse.

Study design

Women with symptomatic uterovaginal or vaginal vault prolapse were randomly allocated to SSLF or IVS. All underwent concomitant anterior repair augmented with self-tailored multifilament polypropylene and polyglactin composite mesh. Before and 2, 12, 24 and 36 months after surgery, the outcome was assessed by examination and standard questions. The primary endpoint was anatomic recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse at stage II or beyond (−1 cm or greater) at any site of the vaginal wall. Secondary outcomes included perioperative and postoperative complications, symptom resolution, reoperation and mesh exposure.

Results

Twenty-two women were recruited from March 2003 to December 2005. At 3-year follow-up3 (2 posterior and 1 apical) out of 14 (21%) in the IVS group had anatomic recurrences of pelvic organ prolapse, and 1 anterior out of 8 (13%) in the SSLF group. Severe operative complications or reoperations did not occur. The proportions of symptomatic patients, including those with dyspareunia, did not differ between the groups. Erosion of the anterior multifilament mesh was found in 2 out of 22 cases (9%; 95% CI 3-28%).

Conclusion

At 3-year follow-up anterior repair reinforced with a composite mesh with concomitant sacrospinous ligament fixation or with concomitant posterior intravaginal slingplasty allowed feasible support in patients with severe pelvic organ prolapse.     

Anatomical and functional assessment of anterior colporrhaphy versus polypropylene mesh surgery in cystocele treatment

Objective

To compare the anatomical and functional results of traditional anterior colporrhaphy and polypropylene mesh surgery in cystocele treatment.Study design: Prospective study conducted in the Urogynecology Clinic of Etlik Zubeyde Hanim Maternity and Women's Health Teaching and Research Hospital between June 2006 and February 2007. Forty patients with stage II and III cystocele according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system were allocated by a computer programme to conventional or mesh surgery. Twenty patients each underwent anterior colporrhaphy (group I) or polypropylene mesh (Sofradim^®, Parieten) surgery (group II). Both groups were followed for 12 months.

Results

At the end of the 12th month, anatomical cure rates were 15/20 (75%) and 19/20 (95%) in groups I and II, respectively, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p < 0.05). De novo stress urinary incontinence developed in one patient in group I. Mesh erosion developed postoperatively in three cases (15%).

Conclusion

In terms of anatomical cure rates, polypropylene mesh surgery was the more successful treatment option when compared with anterior colporrhaphy at the end of 1 year follow-up.     

Complications and patient satisfaction after transobturator anterior and/or posterior tension-free vaginal polypropylene mesh for pelvic organ prolapse

Complications and satisfaction with anterior and/or posterior prolapse repair using a transobturator polypropylene mesh (Prolift) in a single center prospective cohort was assessed. Among 30 women six mesh erosions were noted, five (17%) after anterior and one (3%) with combined anterior and posterior procedures. The patients' impression after six months was 'better' to 'much better' in 25 (84%), no change in four (13%) and one was worse (3%). At six months one patient had suffered re-appearance of an anterior prolapse and one had relapse of both an anterior and posterior prolapse. Concomitant procedures were not significantly related to risk of erosion, but the erosion group was younger (mean age 58 vs. 67 years, p<0.0001). After polypropylene transobturator mesh for pelvic organ prolapse relapses do occur. Safety may be hampered by a high rate of mesh erosions.