Blunt renal injury--an experience of 30 cases

Thirty cases of blunt renal injury are reviewed. The need for rapid and accurate diagnosis of these cases with excretory urography, supplemented in certain patients with renal angiography, is discussed. High-dose excretory urography allows the cases to be categorized into minor or major injuries. All minor injuries can be managed without operation. For major injuries, a conservative approach, if necessary followed by surgical exploration, avoids loss of organ in most of the cases.     

Renal trauma: re-evaluation of the indications for radiographic assessment

We studied prospectively 359 consecutive patients with blunt (306) or penetrating (53) renal trauma to refine the indications for radiographic evaluation. Various factors, including the degree of hematuria, presence of shock and associated injuries easily assessable at the time of initial evaluation, were correlated with the severity of renal injury to determine whether any combination of parameters will separate patients with renal contusions from those with significant renal injuries (minor and major lacerations, and vascular injuries). We identified 3 groups: group 1-85 patients with gross hematuria or microscopic hematuria and shock after blunt trauma (including all 23 with significant renal injuries), group 2-221 patients with microscopic hematuria but no shock after blunt trauma (all with renal contusions) and group 3-53 patients with penetrating trauma. No combination of parameters was able to predict a severe injury in group 3. Our data support radiographic evaluation in groups 1 and 3. However, because all patients in group 2 had renal contusions and experienced no complications from nonoperative management we believe that excretory urography, which is time-consuming and costly, can be avoided in patients with microscopic hematuria but no shock after blunt renal trauma.     

Blunt urinary tract trauma: identifying those patients who require radiological diagnostic studies

We evaluated prospectively 506 consecutive patients who presented with a history of blunt trauma and hematuria. All patients initially underwent excretory urography and cystography. Of the 506 patients 25 had detectable urinary tract injuries that were confirmed either by the initial studies or by computerized tomography, angiography or direct intraoperative inspection. Diagnoses included 7 renal contusions, 7 renal lacerations (1 major and 6 minor), 1 renal artery, 3 intraperitoneal and 5 extraperitoneal bladder ruptures, and 2 urethral injuries. Of the 25 patients 21 presented with gross hematuria, including all of those with lower tract injuries. One of the 4 patients who presented with microhematuria was hospitalized in shock. Of the remaining 3 patients with microhematuria and no shock 1 had a minor renal laceration and 2 had renal contusions. All 3 patients were managed conservatively and all 3 were hospitalized chiefly for associated nonurological injuries. If the patients who presented with microhematuria and no shock were excluded from initial radiographic evaluation, 1 minor renal laceration and 2 renal contusions would have been missed. If we had added 1 more exclusion criterion, that of absence of major associated injuries, we would not have missed an injury.     

An analysis of 30 patients with renal trauma: diagnostic value of radiographic examinations

To evaluate the diagnostic value of radiographic examinations in renal trauma, 30 patients treated between April, 1985 and March, 1988 were examined. The 25 male and 5 female patients ranged in age from 10 to 74 years, with 17 (57%) less than 30 years of age. Causes of injuries were traffic accidents in 19 patients (63%), falls in 5 (17%), sports in 2 (7%), and others in 4 (13%). Twenty-nine patients (97%) had hematuria and 3 (10%) had shock due to renal injury. The presence of shock indicated severe renal injury, but the degree of hematuria did not correlate to severity of injury. Of the 30 patients, 18 (60%) had renal contusions, 7 (23%) had minor lacerations, 4 (13%) had major lacerations and one had vascular injury. One patient had penetrating trauma and the other 29 had blunt trauma. Two patients (7%) had pre-existing renal anomalies. Associated injuries were present in 16 patients (53%). The presence of associated injuries had no relation to the severity of the renal injury. Computerized tomography (CT) with contrast medium was more sensitive to abnormal findings, especially subcapsular and perirenal hematoma, than excretory pyelography. Findings of renal angiography provided additional anatomical information for deciding immediate surgical treatment and for selecting operative methods for salvage of the kidney.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Clinical analysis of 35 patients with renal injury]

Because of the increase of abdominal trauma owing to traffic accident, the number of renal injury is increasing. Between May 1, 1986 and December 31, 1989, thirty-five cases with renal injury were treated in our hospital. The cases were classified as contusion, minor laceration, major laceration and vascular injury by the clinical findings and the radiographic evaluation. Contusion had 22 patients, who were treated conservatively except one with preexisting hydronephrosis. Four patients of minor laceration were all treated conservatively. In four cases of major laceration nephrectomy was performed, the other five cases were healed conservatively. There were two death cases caused by other organ injuries. The extent of associated injuries influenced the prognosis, rather than the degree of renal damage. Thirty-three cases except two survived with no complication. In cases of major injury same were managed conservatively, other required surgical treatment. Sometimes it is difficult to determine which treatment should be done. Indication for surgical treatment is discussed.     

The physical, psychological, and socioeconomic costs of pediatric trauma.

This prospective study examined the physical, psychological, and socioeconomic effects of injuries on children and their immediate families. Ninety-two injured children admitted with minor (ISS less than 16) or major (ISS greater than or equal to 16) injuries were compared with a control group of 59 children admitted during the same period with acute appendicitis. The two populations were similar in mean age, sex ratio, parental age and work status, and number of siblings. The parents of the injured children had a lower level of education than those of the controls. Fifty-four percent of the minor injury patients and 71% of the major injury patients had persistent physical limitations at 12 months in contrast to none of the controls. Thirty-eight percent of minor injury patients had pre-existing behavioral disturbances compared with 14% of major injury patients and 10% of controls. Behavioral disturbances among major trauma patients showed a sharp rise to 41% at 12 months and tended to persist in cases with continuing physical limitations. The major injury patients and those with significant head injuries exhibited a decrease in academic performance; minor injury patients and those without head injury showed no change. Maternal malaise rose sharply to about 40% in both injury groups in contrast to 7% in the controls and was more common in the presence of persistent physical limitations. Only 73% of families in the major injury group had returned to normal family life compared with 87% of the minor injury group and 100% of controls.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Evaluation and treatment of blunt renal trauma

We examined retrospectively the records of 126 patients with blunt renal trauma to determine the criteria for radiological investigations and the imaging study of choice. Of the 3,993 patients admitted to our regional trauma unit during the last 13 years 126 (3.1%) had blunt renal trauma. Mean patient age was 32 years (range 13 to 87 years) and the male-to-female ratio was 3:1. Mean followup was 7 months (median 4 months). Of the patients 72% had a minor renal injury, 17% had a moderate injury and 11% had a major renal injury. Treatment was conservative in 114 patients, while 9 underwent a genitourinary operation. Results were excellent in 87% of the patients and good in 8%, while 5% failed treatment. All patients who had microscopic hematuria without shock had minor injuries. Excretory urograms (IVPs) were normal in 74% and 39% of the patients when performed for minor and moderate renal injuries, respectively. Computerized tomography (CT) was abnormal in all cases when performed, and was more sensitive and specific than an IVP. Therefore, the majority of patients with blunt renal trauma can be treated conservatively with an excellent result. Furthermore, radiological investigations are not needed in those with microscopic hematuria and no shock. When radiological investigations are indicated a CT scan is the imaging study of choice.     

Surgical management of renal trauma: analysis of risk factors, technique, and outcome

The impact of the extent of renal injury and the method of treatment on patient outcome has not been well defined. Ninety-two patients with 96 renal injuries treated by a variety of surgical methods were evaluated to determine whether outcome was influenced by the extent of renal injury (minor, major, vascular, or bilateral) or the method of treatment (exploration alone, renorrhaphy, partial nephrectomy, nephrectomy, vascular repair, combined surgery, or bilateral surgery). Each patient was assessed for the extent of associated injury (injury score, transfusion requirement), the presence of shock, degree of hematuria, type of injury and method of repair, incidence of major complications, and azotemia (creatinine greater than 1.5 mg/dl). Eight patients died, ten developed azotemia, and 35 developed a major complication. There was a statistically significant association between the extent of injury and the development of azotemia. A statistically significant relationship was noted between the type of repair (nephrectomy, combined and bilateral surgery) and the development of azotemia, major complication and eventual death. These relationships, however, seemed to be a product of the extent of associated injury and consequent development of sepsis and multiple organ failure rather than the extent of renal injury or the method of repair.     

PAEDIATRIC RENAL TRAUMA: CAUTION WITH CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT OF MAJOR INJURIES

Background: The kidney is the most frequently injured abdominal organ in children and controversy surrounds some aspects of management. This study looks at the experience of our institution and reviews the literature towards developing an optimal strategy for managing this common childhood injury. Methods: One hundred and forty-two cases of paediatric renal trauma are reported from a catchment population of approximately 240 000 children < 14 years of age over a 12 year period. Injuries were classified into four groups: groups 1 and 2 were regarded as minor injuries (85%) and group 3 and 4 injuries were those with extravasation of urine or pedicle injury (15%). Results: The male:female ratio was 2:I with an average age of 8.5 years. Major renal injuries frequently required large amounts of resuscitation fluid. Associated injuries were present in 41% of all cases with an average of two injuries each. With one exception in each case, the development of complications and the need for early surgery were confined to major injuries. There were no long-term complications. The renal loss rate was 2.1%. Conclusions: Renal injuries can be usefully classified into major or minor by determining whether extravasation of urine or pedicle injury is present. Minor injuries should be managed conservatively. Major injuries causing ongoing haemorrhage require urgent surgery. Other major injuries should be imaged regularly and patients with more severe urinomas benefit from early elective surgery at 2–5 days. In cases where extravasation of urine has not shown clear evidence of settling by 5 days' elective surgery probably results in less morbidity and fewer complications than protracted conservative treatment.     

Outcome after major renovascular injuries: a Western trauma association multicenter report

BACKGROUND: Major renal vascular injuries are uncommon and are frequently associated with a poor outcome. In addition to renal dysfunction, posttraumatic renovascular hypertension may result, although the true incidence of this complication is unknown. The objective of this study was to describe the factors contributing to outcome after major renovascular trauma. We hypothesized that the highest percentage of renal salvage would be achieved by minimizing the time from injury to repair. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review over a 16-year period conducted at six university trauma centers of patients with American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade IV/V renal injuries surviving longer than 24 hours. Postinjury renal function with poor outcome was defined as renal failure requiring dialysis, serum creatinine greater than or equal to 2 mg/dL, renal scan showing less than 25% function of the injured kidney, postinjury hypertension requiring treatment, or delayed nephrectomy. Data collected for analysis included demographics, mechanism of injury, presence of shock, presence of hematuria, associated injuries, type of renal injury (major artery, renal vein, segmental artery), type of repair (primary vascular repair, revascularization, observation, nephrectomy), time from injury to definitive renal surgery, and type of surgeon performing the operation (urologist, vascular surgeon, trauma surgeon). RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients met inclusion criteria; 49% were injured from blunt mechanisms. Patients with blunt injuries were 2.29 times more likely to have a poor outcome compared with those with penetrating injuries. Similarly, the odds ratio of having a poor outcome with a grade V injury (n = 32) versus grade IV (n = 57) was 2.2 (p = 0.085). Arterial repairs had significantly worse outcomes than vein repairs (p = 0.005). Neither the time to definitive surgery nor the operating surgeon's specialty significantly affected outcome. Ten percent (nine patients) developed hypertension or renal failure postoperatively: three had immediate nephrectomies, four had arterial repairs with one intraoperative failure requiring nephrectomy, and two were observed. Of the 20 good outcomes for grade V injuries, 15 had immediate nephrectomy, 1 had a renal artery repair, 1 had a bypass graft, 1 underwent a partial nephrectomy, and 2 were observed. CONCLUSION: Factors associated with a poor outcome following renovascular injuries include blunt trauma, the presence of a grade V injury, and an attempted arterial repair. Patients with blunt major vascular injuries (grade V) are likely to have associated major parenchymal disruption, which contributes to the poor function of the revascularized kidney. These patients may be best served by immediate nephrectomy, provided that there is a functioning contralateral kidney.     

Renal trauma in rural Virginia

We analyzed the cause and nature of renal injuries in a rural environment, and the results of a conservative management program. Over a 10-year period there were 148 patients with nonpenetrating renal injuries and seven with penetrating renal injuries. Nine of the patients with nonpenetrating injuries (6%) had major renal parenchymal injuries and were observed. None required operation and followup in eight of nine suggested no renal functional impairment. Six patients with penetrating injuries underwent exploration and four required nephrectomy for major renal parenchymal or renal pedicle injuries. We conclude that a conservative approach to nonpenetrating minor and major renal parenchymal injuries may be successful.     

Penetrating renal injuries.

A retrospective analysis of 81 penetrating renal injuries revealed a need for surgical exploration in only 39 per cent, and the following conclusions are made: (1) Criteria for classifying a traumatic renal injury as major and therefore requiring further evaluation (arteriography) or appropriate urgent surgery, include urographic nonfunction or extravasation, persistent or severe hematuria or retroperitoneal hemorrhage, and deteriorating clinical status. (2) Preoperative urologic assessment is mandatory to avoid needless renal exploration; 58 per cent of patients with minor injuries were in this series operated on. (3) It is doubtful that late sequelae of penetrating renal injury occur so frequently that immediate surgery to prevent them is advisable.     

Comparison of IVP and CT findings in patients with suspected severe renal injury

Excretory urography (IVP) is the primary diagnostic tool for renal injury but has been indeterminate in diagnosing severe renal injuries in most cases. Computed tomography (CT) provides precise anatomic detail of renal injuries. The IVP and CT findings were compared in 22 patients with suspected severe renal injuries suggested by clinical examination and initial screening IVP. CT provided determinate diagnoses in all the cases of severe renal injury, while the IVP diagnoses were indeterminate in 82 per cent of these cases. Although clarification is needed on the accuracy of CT in diagnosing renal vascular injury, the CT diagnoses were accurate in all other types of severe renal injury (as well as minor renal injuries).     

Blunt maternal trauma: a review of 103 cases

One hundred three pregnant women hospitalized following blunt trauma had injuries classified as: major (20%); minor (17%); or significant (63%). Maternal mortality related only to the severity of maternal injuries: 24% of women who sustained major injuries died. Pregnancy ended unsuccessfully in 18% of all women with known pregnancy outcome. The incidence of unsuccessful pregnancy was 61% following major injuries and 27% following minor injuries. Insignificant maternal injuries did not affect pregnancy outcome. Fetal survival did not relate to gestational age per se. Pregnancy uniformly ended unsuccessfulla in the presence of maternal death, placental injury, uterine injury, and direct fetal injury, and occurred in 80% of women admitted in hemorrhagic shock. An understanding of the ways that the anatomic and physiologic changes of pregnancy alter the nature and frequency of maternal injuries and that maternal response to injury is altered is essential. The best chance for fetal survival is to assure maternal survival.     

Renal trauma in children.

In children the kidney is the organ most frequently injured as a result of blunt abdominal trauma. Controversy exists as to the management of injuries of intermediate severity. At the H?pital Sainte Justine in Montreal, from 1970 to 1976, 71 children aged 2 to 15 years were admitted because of renal trauma caused by blunt abdominal injury. Class I or II lesions (minor injuries) were found in 69% and class III or IV lesions (major or critical injuries) in 31%. Several severe injuries were treated conservatively. There was one death due to multiple associated injuries. Ten patients underwent surgery; nephrectomy was performed in one and heminephrectomy in two patients. One patient with an avulsion injury to the pedicle survived after "bench surgery" and reimplantation of the bruised kidney. Follow-up was obtained in 57 patients; 2 showed posttraumatic scarring. None required subsequent nephrectomy for hypertension or infection.     

Blunt renal pelvic and ureteral injury in multiple-injured patients

The presence of multiple severe injuries influences the management and results with blunt renal pelvic and ureteral injury. Our 9 patients had an average of 4.5 associated injuries per patient and associated renal pedicle injuries in 4 patients. The poor general condition of the multiple-injured patient precluded the optimal management of the blunt renal pelvic and ureteral injury in 5 of the 9 patients. Delayed repair was performed in 4 patients with a successful result in 3. The fourth patient had a complicated course resulting in nephrectomy. The delay in presentation and diagnosis of the renal pelvic or ureteral injury did not preclude a successful result with delayed repair.     

Blunt renal trauma in childhood. Features indicating severe injury

The clinical presentation of children with blunt renal trauma may differ from that of adults. The clinical features at presentation of 50 consecutive children (20 severe injuries, no pedicle injuries) admitted over a period of almost 8 years were reviewed to determine if there were clinical clues to major renal trauma in childhood. Gross haematuria and low haematocrit were the most helpful factors at the time of presentation and correlated well with severe renal injury. Hypotension was seen in 4 patients and only 1 had severe renal trauma. Suspicion of a major renal injury should be high when there is gross haematuria or a low haematocrit. In this study only 1 of 20 patients with major renal injury demonstrated clinical signs of shock. Unlike adults, hypotension does not appear to be a reliable indicator of the severity of renal injury in children and diagnostic evaluation should not be reserved only for those in shock.     

Pancreatic injuries in childhood due to blunt trauma

The records of 22 children who suffered pancreatic injury in whom laparotomy confirmed the diagnosis were reviewed. First, we wished to define diagnostic factors that would distinguish transections and injuries that resulted in pseudocysts (which we termed major injuries) from contusions and lacerations that required no specific operation (minor injuries). Second, we wanted to determine how the timing of diagnosis and treatment of major injuries influenced hospital course. There were 13 major injuries (ten transections, three pseudocysts) and nine minor injuries. Abdominal tenderness (present in 83%) failed to distinguish major from minor injuries. Major injuries appeared to be associated with rising values of serum amylase taken serially over 24 to 48 hours (P = .05). Computerized tomography and ultrasound obtained in the first days after injury gave nonspecific findings and failed to give a definitive diagnosis. Of 13 patients with major injuries, seven underwent laparotomy within 24 hours of injury; six, two days or more. The mean hospital stay in the early group (16.7 days) was significantly shorter than that in the late group (38.8 days). Our review suggests that timely diagnosis of major pancreatic injuries and prompt surgical treatment can shorten hospitalization without increasing morbidity. The diagnosis of surgically significant pancreatic injuries continues to be a primary clinical challenge.     

Major bowel and diaphragmatic injuries associated with blunt spleen or liver rupture

The incidence of major bowel and diaphragm injuries occurring in association with blunt spleen and liver ruptures in adults was studied. Of 142 patients with splenic injuries, five had major bowel injuries and 12 had diaphragmatic ruptures. Of 102 patients with blunt hepatic injury, 13 had either bowel or diaphragm ruptures or both. Six bowel and diaphragm injuries occurred in 42 patients with blunt ruptures of both the liver and spleen. Anatomically minor spleen injuries were associated with a 4.8% risk of bowel or diaphragm rupture. Anatomically major splenic lacerations had associated bowel or diaphragm wounds in 16.4% of cases (p = 0.024). A 20% incidence of partial-thickness bowel wounds was found in patients with hepatic or splenic injury, but the natural history of these wounds is unknown.     

Type of blunt renal injury rather than associated extravasation should determine treatment

The significance of extravasation of dye during excretion urography in blunt renal injuries has been controversial, with some believing that extravasation, even if copious, is largely innocuous and characterized by spontaneous resolution, and others believing extravasation is an indication for surgical correction of the underlying blunt renal injury. Thirty-two patients with extravasation diagnosed on excretion urography after blunt external trauma were evaluated. Immediate surgical management of the renal injury was performed in 18 patients who had a contusion in 1, laceration in 13, rupture in 3, and pedicle injury in 1, and averaged 2.0 associated injuries per patient. Conservative management of the renal injury was performed in 14 patients who averaged 1.1 associated injuries per patient. Ten of the 14 patients had a large renal laceration splitting the kidney or disrupting a pole with extravasation and none settled to normal. The data showed that extravasation with a small laceration resolved spontaneously while extravasation with a major disruption of the kidney did not settle to normal.