Hepatitis B surface antigenemia following recombinant Engerix B hepatitis B vaccine in an 81-year-old ESRD patient on hemodialysis

The first cases of transient hepatitis B surface antigenemia (HBsAg) in adults following hepatitis B virus (HBV) immunization were reported in the 1990s. HBV immunization is mandatory for all hemodialysis (HD) patients. Ly et al. who demonstrated transient HBsAg in eight out of nine HD patients following HBV vaccine concluded that HD patients should not be screened for HBV within a week of HBV immunization and that positive HBsAg within a month of HBV immunization must be interpreted with caution. We present an 81-year-old woman on HD, who needed a booster Recombivax (Merck, Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA) vaccine after remaining hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) negative from previous vaccinations. The HD Unit had switched to Engerix B (GlaxoSmithKline, Atlanta, GA, USA) HBV vaccine. Two days after the first Engerix B vaccine, HBsAg was detected. She was asymptomatic; ALT was 25 U/L. Repeat testing for HBsAg, HBsAb, hepatitis B E antigen (HB E Ag), and hepatitis B DNA (HB DNA), a week later, all returned negative. Previous reports of transient HBsAg following HBV vaccines were after Engerix B vaccination. Our patient is unusual since she had received both brands of HBV vaccines, sequentially, at different times. Twice, HBsAg tests completed as early as 5 days following Recombivax vaccine were negative. We submit that positive HBsAg tests are more likely following Engerix B vaccines. We reemphasize previous recommendations that patients should not be screened for HBsAg < 4 weeks following HBV immunization. This is particularly important in HD units where hepatitis B screening is carried out routinely all year round and hepatitis B vaccinations are commonplace. Very strict schedules must be adopted to avoid false positive HBsAg tests.     

Persistence of immunologic memory in long-term hemodialysis patients and healthcare workers given hepatitis B vaccine: role of a booster dose on antibody response

Hepatitis B (HB) vaccine is effective in producing protection against HB virus infection, but the persistence of immunity remains largely unknown. Seventy-six hemodialysis (HD) patients (60 after primary HB vaccination and 16 with natural immunity) and 46 healthcare workers (32 after primary HB vaccination and 14 with natural immunity) were followed up for 10 years to evaluate the persistence of immunity. Ten years after vaccination, the analysis showed a lower seroconversion rate (38 vs. 75%, p < 0.001) in HD patients as compared with healthcare workers. In the follow-up period, the protective immunity developed through HB virus infection also showed a lower seroconversion rate (44 vs. 86%, p < 0.025) in HD patients as compared with healthcare workers. To assess the status of immunologic memory, we administered a booster dose of HB vaccine 3-12 years (mean 6.7 +/- 0.6 years) after primary vaccination in a selected group of 37 HD patients who presented a decline of their antibodies or were nonresponders. In another group of 12 healthcare workers who had a decline of their antibodies, we also administered a booster dose of HB vaccine 5-8 years (mean 5.8 +/- 0.3 years) after primary vaccination. Nineteen of the 37 HD patients (51%) presented an anamnestic response to the booster dose, and 15 of these (40%) were high responders. All of the healthcare workers responded to the booster dose with a high antibody response. We conclude that patients undergoing HD not only have lower rates of immunization to HB than healthy adults, but also that these are frequently transient. Booster doses after a primary course of vaccine are effective in about the half of HD patients who presented a decline of their antibodies or were nonresponders but whether they are necessary is unclear. The majority of healthcare workers continue to have high levels of protective HBs antibody for at least 10 years and routine boosters are not required.     

Hepatitis B vaccination in human immunodeficiency virus-infected adults receiving hemodialysis

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends hepatitis B virus (HBV) immunization for all hemodialysis (HD) patients because they are at high risk of infection. Several studies have shown that the development of protective antibody titers after HBV vaccination is much lower in HD patients. We hypothesized that human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) would further impair the immune response to hepatitis B vaccination. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing long-term hemodialysis from 1990 to 2002 at the United States-based dialysis facilities of Gambro Corporation, North America. The response rate defined as an increase in anti-HBs levels >/=10 mIU/L after a month of the third dose of HBV vaccination was determined in HIV-infected and a randomly selected group of ESRD patients. The demographic information, laboratory data, and hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) titers were recorded from the Gambro Corporation database on these patients. RESULTS: Of the 347 adult HIV ESRD patients, 116 received three doses of recombinant hepatitis B vaccination. Seventy percent were male, and the majority (86%) were black. Of the 116 patients who received three doses of HBV vaccination, 62 (53.4%) developed protective antibody titers. This was comparable to the response rate of 50.4% in the randomly selected 220 non-HIV hemodialysis patients. Among HIV ESRD patients, the mean hemoglobin (Hgb) was higher in patients who developed protective antibody titers (Hgb 11.61 +/- 2 vs. 10.55 +/- 1.86, P value <0.01). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, higher Hgb was associated with protective antibody titers (odds ratio: 1.34, 95% CI 0.99-1.72). Seventy percent of the HIV-infected responders maintained protective antibody titers 6 months after vaccination. CONCLUSION: Hepatitis B vaccination should be offered to all HIV-infected ESRD patients because over half of the patients with HIV and ESRD can develop protective antibodies.     

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor as an adjuvant to hepatitis B vaccination in maintenance hemodialysis patients

Patients on maintenance hemodialysis (HD) have poor seroconversion rate after hepatitis B vaccination. The present study was designed to test the efficacy of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) as an adjuvant to hepatitis B vaccination for improving seroconversion rate in maintenance HD patients. Twelve chronic HD patients were randomly assigned to receive either hepatitis B vaccination alone or hepatitis B vaccination 24 h after 1 dose of GM-CSF for primary immunization. A group of 16 chronic HD patients who had not seroconverted after a standard two-dose hepatitis B vaccination were randomly assigned either to a booster dose of hepatitis B vaccine alone or a booster dose given 24 h after one dose of GM-CSF. In the primary immunization group only 2 of 6 patients (33%) who had received vaccination alone, versus 5 of 6 patients (83%) who had received hepatitis B vaccine after one dose of GM-CSF, developed seroprotective antibody titers. Moreover, seroprotective antibody titers (IU/ml) were significantly higher in the latter group (275 +/- 286.5 vs. 14 +/- 22, p < 0.05). In patients who had not seroconverted with prior hepatitis B vaccination, GM-CSF adjuvant therapy significantly increased the seroconversion rate versus booster dose alone (87.5 vs. 25%, respectively, p < 0.02), with significantly higher seroprotective antibody titers (84 +/- 80 vs. 19 +/- 33 IU/ml, respectively, p < 0. 05). These findings suggest that administration of one dose of GM-CSF, as adjuvant therapy, prior to primary or booster dose hepatitis B vaccination may significantly increase seroconversion rate and seroprotective antibody titers in chronic HD patients.     

Good response to HBsAg vaccine in dialysis patients is associated with high CD4+/CD8+ ratio

Objective

Chronic renal failure is accompanied by various abnormalities of innate and acquired, cellular and humoral immunity. We aimed to investigate whether positive Candida skin test results, CD4+ and CD8+, before the first dose of vaccination could be a predictor for antibody response to hepatitis B vaccination and the relation of these parameters with hepatitis B antibody levels 1?month after the last dose of vaccination.

Materials and methods

The present study was carried out in 57 dialysis patients. All patients received recombinant hepatitis B vaccine (40???g) given intramuscularly in the deltoid muscle in a four-dose schedule at 0, 1, 2, and 6?months. Candida skin test and lymphocyte subsets (CD4+ and CD8+) were determined before the first dose of vaccination and 1?month after the fourth inoculation of hepatitis B vaccine.

Results

Ten patients (17.5%) were non-responders (HBsAb??100?IU/L), which was determined 1?month after the fourth dose of vaccination. Thirty-nine patients (68.4%) and 44 patients (77.2%) were anergic to Candida skin test before the first dose and 1?month after fourth inoculation of hepatitis B vaccine, respectively. There was no relationship between Candida skin test and response to hepatitis B vaccination. Mean age was lower, and CD4+/CD8+ ratio measured both before and after vaccination was higher in good responders compared with that of weak responders and that of non-responders. Females were better responders than males.

Conclusion

High skin test anergy rate and low seroconversion rate after hepatitis B vaccination are important problems in patients on dialysis. Females, younger patients, and patients with higher CD4+/CD8+ ratio have better HBsAb antibody response to hepatitis B vaccination.     

Effect of levamisole supplementation on hepatitis B virus vaccination response in hemodialysis patients

Aim:   As an immune-modulating agent, levamisole has been reported to stimulate depressed T-cell activity, enhance B lymphocyte function and restore delayed hypersensitivity reactions in immune-depressed patients. There are a number of recent studies claiming that levamisole can improve response rate to hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination in haemodialysis patients. The present study has examined this hypothesis amongst some Iranian patients, using double-blind randomized clinical trial.
Methods:   During a 12 month period, 70 patients on maintenance haemodialysis with negative anti-hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) and HBV core antibody (HBcAb), from four different dialysis centres were enrolled into the study. The patients were randomized to two groups. The first group (levamisole group) received 40 μg doses of recombinant HBV vaccine i.m. at 0, 1 and 6 months, plus 100 mg levamisole p.o., after each haemodialysis session. The second group (placebo group) received the same vaccination protocol, except for the placebo instead of levamisole. The patients were followed on serum HBsAb level. Those with an HBsAb level of above 10 mIU/mL, 1 month after the third dose of vaccination, were considered as responders.
Results:   The levamisole group was comprised of 38 patients and the placebo group of 32 patients. Thirty-one patients (81.6%) of levamisole group and 26 patients (81.3%) of placebo group responded to vaccination. The difference between two groups was not significant.
Conclusion:   This study indicated that in a haemodialysis population with high response to HBV vaccination, levamisole might have no significant effect in enhancing the response. Further studies with higher power can give more accurate results.     

5岁以下儿童肝移植术后注射乙肝疫苗免疫效果的多因素分析

目的探讨5岁以下儿童肝移植术后接种乙肝疫苗免疫应答的效果及多针次接种必要性的评估。方法回顾性分析2014年2月—2018年12月于首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院普外科同一肝移植组进行肝移植手术,术后遵医嘱注射乙肝疫苗完成4针次以上的5岁以下170例患儿的临床资料,其中男性75例,女性95例,年龄4个月至5岁,患儿每针次接种疫苗后随来院肝移植门诊复诊时抽血检测乙肝五项,观察HBsAb应答效果及其相关影响因素。计数资料数据用例数和百分数(%)表示,组间比较用χ^2检验。结果5岁以下患儿肝移植术后完成第1个疗程乙肝疫苗注射后免疫应答成功121例(HBsAb≥100 IU/L),应答失败49例(HBsAb<100 IU/L),接种第2个疗程后应答成功29例,最终只有20例患儿接种8针次即2个疗程后HBsAb<10 IU/L。影响乙肝疫苗接种免疫效果的相关因素与性别、原发病、供肝方式、术后接种疫苗时间无关,与年龄、居住地、术前HBsAb滴度高低有关(抗-HBs以100 IU/L为标准)。平均年龄2岁以上患儿明显比1岁以下患儿术后接种第1个疗程后免疫应答率高,术前儿童接种过乙肝疫苗且抗-HBs滴度>100 IU/L患儿其术后接种第1疗程后免疫应答率更高(84.72%),术前抗-HBs滴度<100 IU/L患儿术后接种乙肝疫苗第1疗程后免疫应答稍低(60.71%)。结论大部分肝移植患儿可通过接种乙肝疫苗主动免疫获得保护性抗体来预防乙肝病毒再感染,坚持多针次接种能有效地诱导机体产生乙肝抗体,提高免疫应答水平,具有保护效果,且经济有效,肝移植术后接种乙肝疫苗存在必要性,是目前肝移植术后推广应用方法之一。     

Challenges in containing the burden of hepatitis B infection in dialysis and transplant patients in India

Aim: Whether or not completing the hepatitis B vaccination in patients who have undergone kidney transplantation in the middle of incomplete vaccination schedule leads to development of protective antibody titres is not known. This study was designed to determine whether the strategy of completing hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination after transplantation is efficacious. Methods: Sixty‐four end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) patients were screened for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), antibodies to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti‐HBs), hepatitis B e‐antigen (HBeAg) and HBV DNA. HBsAg negative patients received four doses of 40 µg recombinant HBV vaccine. Schedule was continued in after transplantation period if it was incomplete before transplant. Anti‐Hbs titres were evaluated at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Results: Past HBV infection was noted in 12 patients: 10 by serology plus viraemia and two by viraemia alone. Of the 46 patients without current or past HBV infection who had received at least two doses of the vaccine before transplant, 17 each had received two and three doses and 12 had completed the schedule. Seventeen (37%) exhibited protective titres. Patients who had completed vaccination were more likely to have protective titres than those incompletely vaccinated (P = 0.02). Five patients responded to post‐transplant vaccination. Conclusion: Partially vaccinated patients do not mount an adequate antibody response despite continued vaccination in the post‐transplant period, whereas complete vaccination provides protection in 60%. The present study data highlights the need of administration of a full schedule of HBV vaccination before kidney transplantation. Nucleic acid‐based tests can identify occult HBV infection.     

The comparison of antibody response to influenza vaccination in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis,hemodialysis and renal transplantation patients

BACKGROUND: The immune system in renal transplant (Tx), Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis (CAPD) and hemodialysis (HD) patients have been suppressed and antibody response to vaccination is weaker than that of the normal population. Additionally immune response to vaccination also differs from each other in aforementioned three groups resulting from different levels immunosuppression. In the present study, detection of antibody response to influenza vaccine as an indicator of the level of immunity in Tx, CAPD and HD patients was aimed PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients (17 Tx, 16 CAPD and 15 HD) and 10 healthy adults, as a control group were enrolled into the study. Purified, split-virus, commercial trivalent influenza vaccine (VAXIGRIP--Pasteur Merieux Connaught, single dose of 0.5 ml into the deltoid muscle) containing 15 microg of each hemagglutinin of A/Johannesburg/82/96 (H1N1), A/Nachang/933/95 (H3N2) and B/Harbin/07/94 (B) strains were administered to all subjects. Serum samples were collected before and 1 month after vaccination to determine antibody titers. Hemagglutination-inhibition test (HI) was applied for determination of antibody response. The antibody response against each strain was measured separately. In addition to measurement of antibody response, increments in antibody titer (n-fold increase in titer), proportion of patients with protective antibody levels and seroconversion levels were taken into account. Wilcoxon paired 2 test and Mann-Whitney U test were applied for statistical analysis. p < 0.05 was accepted as significance level. RESULTS: Significant increases in antibody titers for all three antigens were observed in the study groups after vaccination (p = 0.001). However, the increase in titer of H3N2 was lower in Tx, CAPD and HD patients than that of the control group (1.0-2.0 vs 5.00) (p = 0.01). The proportion of protective antibody titers and seroconvertions were increased after vaccination in all subjects. Proportions of patients with protective antibody titers after vaccination were lower in Tx, CAPD and HD groups in comparison to control group. CONCLUSION: Although antibody titers in Tx, CAPD and HD patients presented significant increases after vaccination, the proportions of patients with protective antibody titers were lower in comparison to control group. Tx, CAPD and HD patients should be vaccinated every year to be able avoid potential morbidity and mortality of the influenza infection. Trial of high dose vaccination protocols may be useful to increase the proportion of patients with protective antibody levels.     

Low response to HBsAg vaccine in chronic renal failure patients is not due to intrinsic defect of B cells

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether the inability of chronic renal failure patients to mount an adequate antibody response following hepatitis B vaccination was due to an inherent defect in the antibody producing capacity of their B cells. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells of end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, who were not on maintenance hemodialysis (CRF) and those undergoing long-term hemodialysis (HD) were stimulated in vitro with pokeweed mitogen, a B cell mitogen or hepatitis B surface antigen. The total immunoglobulin (IgG, IgM and IgA) levels and anti-HBs specific IgM and IgG were quantitiated by sandwich ELISA and levels between patients who had a good antibody response in vivo and those who failed to mount an antibody response were compared. RESULTS: Spontaneous IgG production was significantly higher than normals in CRF and HD group; PWM induced IgM, IgG and IgA production was comparable to normals in both groups of patients. The spontaneous IgG and PWM stimulated IgM and IgG production was significantly higher in HD patients as compared to CRF. The in vitro Ig levels in the vaccine responders and non-responders was comparable except for the spontaneous IgG which was highest in the responders. The in vitro anti-HBs production was comparable in HB vaccine responders and non-responders; the in vivo and in vitro anti-HBs titers showed a significant correlation coefficient thereby indicating that the in vitro assay reflects the in vivo functional status of B cells. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that the B cells in ESRD patients are functionally normal and cannot be the cause of the compromised vaccine response in these patients.     

Efficacy of GM-CSF as an Adjuvant to Hepatitis B Vaccination in Patients with Chronic Renal Failure—Results of a Prospective,Randomized Trial

Background.?Chronic renal failure patients on hemodialysis are at an increased risk of acquiring hepatitis B infection. Hence vaccination against hepatitis B assumes great importance in these patients. However, the response to hepatitis B vaccination is poor, even when 4 double doses (40 µg) of the vaccine are given. This study was conducted to determine the efficacy of GM-CSF as an adjuvant to hepatitis B vaccine in CRF patients. Methods.?CRF patients including both hemodialysis (HD) and non-dialysis (ND) patients were randomized to receive either placebo or a single injection of GM-CSF (in varying doses of 50 µg, 100 µg, 150 µg) a day prior to the 1st dose of recombinant hepatitis B vaccine (40 µg). Three more doses of the vaccine were given at 1, 2, and 6 months. The anti-HBs antibody titres were measured by ELISA at 3 and 7 months. Patients having antibody titres less than 10 IU/L were considered non-responders. The response rate and mean antibody titers were compared between the control (I) and GM-CSF (II) groups. Results.?In group I, 31 and 27 patients were available for evaluation at 3 and 7 months respectively. In group II, 33 and 28 patients could be evaluated at the same time points. Within the control group (group I), the response rate in hemodialysis patients (63.6%) was lower as compared to non-dialysis patients (81.2%). The response rate in group II was higher than that in group I at both 3 months as well as 7 months (78.1% vs. 62.3% and 89.3% vs. 74.1%, p = ns). The best response rates in group II were observed when GM-CSF was used in a dose of 150 µg (90.9% at 3 months and 100% at 7 months). The mean antibody titers were also found to be higher in the group II as compared to group I (409.6 vs. 243.9 IU/L, p = 0.01). Conclusion.?The results of this randomized, prospective study suggest that: 1. Patients with chronic renal failure should be vaccinated for hepatitis B as chronic renal insufficiency is established. 2. GM-CSF is an effective adjuvant to hepatitis B vaccine in these patients especially when a priming dose of 150 µg is used prior to 1st dose of hepatitis B vaccination.     

Durability of the hepatitis B vaccination in pediatric renal transplant recipients

Since hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine implementation, HBV infection has significantly decreased. However, adult renal transplant recipients show a higher rate of seroreversion compared to the general population, leading to HBV infection risk. Data are limited in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Retrospective data were collected to determine the seroprotection and durability of HBV vaccination in pediatric renal transplant patients from 2004 to 2014. One hundred subjects were categorized based on pre‐ and post‐transplant hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb). Pretransplant, 85 recipients (85%) had a positive HBsAb compared to 15 (15%) with negative HBsAb. In univariable analyses, other than age (P < .05) no significant differences existed pretransplant by demographics, pretransplantation dialysis, or number of vaccinations. Of the 85 pretransplantation responders, 53 (62%) remained HBsAb positive post‐transplantation, 28 (32%) seroreverted, and 4 developed indeterminate titers. All seroreversions occurred within 5 years post‐transplant. Receipt of a living donor organ had higher risk of reversion (P = .005). No significant differences were found in demographics, pretransplantation dialysis, vaccination number, or acute rejection. Despite vaccination, 15% of pediatric renal transplant candidates were seronegative, and an additional 32% lost seroprotection within 5 years post‐transplantation leaving nearly half of transplant recipients at risk for HBV infection.     

Active influenza immunization in hemodialysis patients: comparison between single-dose and booster vaccination

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Hemodialysis (HD) patients are recommended to be immunized against influenza annually, but the immune response after vaccination is known to be weakened in these patients. We intended to compare the efficacy of influenza vaccines in HD patients with that in healthy people, and we also evaluated the additive effect of a booster vaccination in HD patients. METHODS: During the 2003-2004 influenza season, 100 patients on HD and 50 age-matched healthy controls were recruited from the Korea University Guro Hospital. The HD patients were divided into two groups: single-dose group (50 patients) and booster group (50 patients). Eight weeks following the influenza vaccination, the serum antibody responses were compared. RESULTS: Although the antibody response of the HD patients was impaired in comparison with that of healthy controls, more than 90% of the HD patients showed protective antibody levels. Booster vaccination did not significantly increase the immune response in HD patients. CONCLUSIONS: Influenza vaccination in HD patients should be encouraged, but the immune response was comparatively impaired in subpopulations, including patients with a long-term HD history (>2.5 years), with a higher urea reduction rate, or with underlying diabetes. There was no effect of a booster vaccine dose on the antibody titers.     

Hepatitis B core antibody positive donors as a safe and effective therapeutic option to increase available organs for lung transplantation

BACKGROUND: The use of hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb+) and hepatitis C antibody (HCV Ab+) positive donors represents one strategy to increase available donor organs, but this remains controversial because of concern for viral transmission to recipients. We hypothesized that isolated HBcAb+ donors represent minimal risk of viral transmission in vaccinated lung transplant (LTx) recipients. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed of LTx recipients who received HBcAb+ or HCV Ab+ pulmonary allografts. We analyzed liver function studies, viral hepatitis screening tests, quantitative polymerase chain reaction for hepatitis B viral DNA (HBV DNA) and hepatitis C viral RNA (HCV RNA), freedom from bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, acute rejection, and survival. RESULTS: Between April 1992 and August 2003, 456 LTx operations were performed. Twenty-nine patients (HB group) received HBcAb+ allograft transplants with a median posttransplant follow-up of 24.5 months. Three critically ill patients (HC group) received HCV Ab+ allografts with a median follow-up of 21.5 months. One-year survival for the HB group is 83% versus 82% for all patients who received non-HB organs (P=0.36). No patient in the HB group developed clinical liver disease because of viral hepatitis, and all patients alive (n=21) at follow-up are, to date, HBV DNA and/or HBcAb negative. All patients in the HC group tested HCV RNA positive; one patient died of liver failure at 22 months. CONCLUSIONS: Risk of viral transmission with HCV Ab+ allografts seems high after LTx. However, the use of HBcAb+ pulmonary allografts in recipients with prior hepatitis B vaccination seems to be a safe and effective strategy to increase organ availability.     

Risk of de novo hepatitis in liver recipients from hepatitis-B core antibody-positive grafts - a systematic analysis

Skagen CL, Jou JH, Said A. Risk of de novo hepatitis in liver recipients from hepatitis‐B core antibody‐positive grafts – a systematic analysis.
Clin Transplant 2011: 25: E243–E249. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Many transplant programs utilize liver grafts from hepatitis‐B core antibody (HBcAb)‐positive and hepatitis‐B surface antigen (HBsAg)‐negative donors. However, there is risk for de novo hepatitis B (DNH) in recipients of these grafts. We reviewed 26 studies reporting the rates of DNH in recipients receiving HBcAb‐positive liver grafts. Four hundred and sixty‐two donor–recipient pairs were included to evaluate the risk of DNH stratified by the recipient’s immune status to hepatitis B and type of prophylactic therapy given, if any. The rate of DNH was highest (58%) in the stratum of hepatitis‐B (HBV) naïve recipients who did not receive prophylaxis. In HBV naïve recipients, prophylactic therapy (lamivudine and/or hepatitis‐B immunoglobulin – HBIG) reduced DNH to 11% (odds ratio [OR] = 11.1, 95% CI 4.98–25, p < 0.0001 for DNH without prophylaxis). Recipients with hepatitis‐B surface antibody (HBsAb) positivity had DNH rates of 18% without prophylaxis and 0% with prophylaxis (OR = 9.2, 95% CI 1.1–83.3, p = 0.039). Recipients with both HBsAb and HBcAb positivity had DNH rates of 4% without prophylaxis and 3% with prophylaxis (p = 1.00), while recipients with HBcAb positivity alone had DNH rates of 14% without prophylaxis and 3% with prophylaxis (p = 0.21). There was no significant difference between the types of HBV prophylaxis received whether lamivudine, HBIG or both. However, in the subgroup who received HBIG alone, rates of DNH were higher after cessation of HBIG prophylaxis compared to DNH rates with indefinite HBIG (p = 0.0002). In summary, the risk of DNH is highest for HBV naïve liver recipients from HBcAb‐positive donors. Recipients who are HBV naïve as well as those recipients with isolated HBsAb positivity derive significant benefit from HBV prophylaxis after transplantation with a HBcAb‐positive graft. The ideal prophylactic regimen for prevention of DNH is unclear, but based on our analysis of the literature, antivirals alone may suffice. More data are needed with the newer antivirals for hepatitis B.     

Low Dose Intradermal Vaccination Is Superior to High Dose Intramuscular Vaccination for Hepatitis B in Unresponsive Hemodialysis Patients

After two intramuscular (IM) vaccination protocols (40 μg at 0, 1, 2, and 6 months), patients who were unresponsive to hepatitis B vaccination were collected from three HD centers. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of intradermal (ID) and repeated IM vaccination protocols. Thirty-three of 639 HD patients were found to be unresponsive. Patients were randomly assigned into two groups: one to receive 80 μg ID and the other 160 μg IM vaccination protocol. Both ID (p?=?0.000) and IM (p?=?0.03) groups disclosed statistically significant seroconversion rates six months after the last vaccination dose. The seroconversion rate was 94.1% in the ID and 50% in the IM groups—showing a significant improvement in the ID group (p?=?0.011). A low-dose ID is superior to standard IM vaccination protocol and also more cost-effective in unresponsive HD patients.     

Efficacy of the accelerated hepatitis B vaccination schedule used in haemodialysis patients post-exposure to virus: a single-centre experience.

BACKGROUND: The hepatitis B (HB) vaccination regime currently recommended for use in the UK for both preventative and post-exposure purposes is the accelerated regime, although there have been no recent reports of its efficacy. This observational study reports on the response rate achieved and longevity of protection conferred with this regime in a large number of haemodialysis patients following an episode of HB exposure. METHODS: One-hundred and five patients received primary vaccination (vaccine administered at 0, 1 and 2 months). Eighty-six completed the regime, receiving a booster dose at month 12. Measuring antibodies to HB surface antigen (anti-HBS) 6 weeks after receiving the third and fourth doses assessed patients' response. Seventy-seven patients subsequently had anti-HBs measured at month 24. RESULTS: The response rate (anti-HBS >10 mIU/ml) to primary vaccination and the complete regime was 33 and 73%, respectively. Non-European patients responded better to primary vaccination than Europeans (P=0.014). Those receiving steroids responded less well to the complete vaccination regime (P=0.007). Patient's age, sex, renal diagnosis, diabetes mellitus, time on dialysis, dialysis adequacy, erythropoietin dose, hepatitis C or body weight did not affect response rates. By month 24, 24 responders (44%) had lost seroprotection. Antibody levels achieved with vaccination by transient responders was significantly lower than persistent responders. No patients became HB surface antigen positive during the 2-year study. CONCLUSION: Reserving the accelerated vaccination to the post-exposure scenario will expose many more patients to the risk of HB cross-infection than if used prophylactically. Regular monitoring is required if seroprotection is to be maintained.     

The significance of serum homocysteine levels in diabetic patients on haemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Atherosclerotic diseases are the major cause of mortality and morbidity in patients on haemodialysis (HD). Furthermore, the prognosis of diabetic patients on HD is especially poor due to atherosclerotic complications. Because homocysteine (Hcy), a sulfur-containing amino acid, is emerging as an important risk factor for atherosclerosis in patients with end-stage renal disease, we examined the significance of serum Hcy levels in diabetic patients on HD. METHODS: We measured total serum Hcy levels (tHcy) in 31 patients with diabetes mellitus on HD (DM group) and 37 non-diabetic patients on HD (N group), adjusting for age and HD duration. Linear regression analysis was used to assess the correlation of multiple variables to tHcy. RESULTS: The proportion of atherosclerotic disease in the DM group was significantly higher than in the N group. However, serum tHcy, serum creatinine and per cent creatinine generation rate in the DM group were significantly lower than in the N group. In the DM group, serum tHcy was positively correlated with creatinine, albumin and per cent creatinine generation rate, respectively. This was not the case in the N group. CONCLUSIONS: The demethylation pathway in methionine metabolism in the liver, which is linked directly to the creatinine generation system, may be disturbed in diabetic patients on HD. This may be the reason why serum tHcy and creatinine in diabetic patients on HD are lower than in non-diabetic patients on HD. Therefore, it is necessary to consider the possibility of an altered relation between serum tHcy and vessel disease when evaluating the atherogenic risk in diabetic patients on HD.     

Adequate seroresponse to influenza vaccination in dialysis patients

BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis (HD) patients are immunocompromised, and they have been shown to react suboptimally to recommended vaccinations. Advances in dialysis therapy and other supportive measures may theoretically result in better immune system functions. Clinical evidence supporting this theory has, however, not been presented. With influenza vaccination response, we tried to address this question. METHODS: 42 HD and 15 continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients were vaccinated with a trivalent influenza vaccine, and the seroresponses at 5 weeks were measured. The results were compared with those of similarly vaccinated 20 nephrology outpatient clinic patients with varying degrees of renal insufficiency and those of 31 cardiac patients with normal renal function. RESULTS: The dialysis patients had higher prevaccination titers of hemagglutination-inhibiting (HI) antibodies to all three vaccine virus antigens than the other groups due to more frequent previous vaccinations. The dialysis patients exhibited lower antibody increases, but an almost comparable proportion of them reached a protective antibody level (HI titers > or =40) 5 weeks after vaccination [A/H3N2: 61% (cardiac patients), 35% (nephrology outpatient clinic patients), 67% (CAPD), and 36% (HD); A/H1N1: 71, 70, 80 and 60; B: 97, 90, 80, and 76%, respectively]. Among the HD group, all patients receiving parenteral calcitriol except 1 (83%), but only 50% of the other HD patients produced protective antibody titers at least to two out of three vaccine virus antigens. No other patient- or HD treatment-associated parameter was significantly related to the vaccination-induced antibody response. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that influenza vaccination of dialysis patients according to current recommendations may be effective. Additionally, our results suggest that parenteral calcitriol treatment may augment the immune response of HD patients even in a clinically relevant way, an effect so far shown only in in vitro studies.     

Loss of hepatitis B immunity in hemodialysis patients acquired either naturally or after vaccination

AIM: The aim of our study was the long-term evolution of hepatitis B immunity and the titers of antibodies against the surface antigen (anti-HBs) acquired either naturally or after vaccination in hemodialysis (HD) patients with no history of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. METHODS: 36 HD patients were vaccinated with 4 doses of 40 microg recombinant B vaccine (Engerix, Rixensart, Belgium), intramuscularly at 0, 1, 2 and 6 months. 21 patients (60%) seroconverted developing anti-HBs titers > or = 10 IU/ml. Two patients were transferred to another unit before completion of 6 months after the last vaccine dose. We followed-up 19 HD patients who were immune against HBV after vaccination (Group A), and 30 immune patients (anti-HBs titers > or = 10 IU/ml) who had never been vaccinated and had antibodies against the core antigen (anti-HBc), diagnostic of natural HBV infection (Group B). In all patients of Groups A and B, anti-HBs were determined every 6 months, starting 6 months after the last dose in the vaccinated patients. Follow-up period lasted from October 2002 - April 2006. RESULTS: The mean follow-up in Group A was 21 +/- 12 months (range 6 - 36) and in Group B 29 +/- 12 months (range 6 - 42). Age, sex, presence of diabetes mellitus and duration of dialysis did not differ between the two groups. Five patients in Group A (26%) and 2 patients in Group B (9%) lost immunity (anti-HBs < 10 IU/ml) (p = 0.07). The median time to loss of immunity in Group A patients was 12 months (interquartile range 6 - 18 months), while in Group B patients it was 15 months (interquartile range 12 - 18 months). No booster dose was administered during the study. The 2 patients of Group B who lost immunity were the oldest of the group and redeveloped anti-HBs 6 and 12 months after they had lost it. During the first 6 months of the follow-up period, Group A had significantly higher anti-HBs titers than Group B (p < 0.05). However, this difference was lost later on, and after the first year of follow-up, anti-HBs titers were decreased significantly in Group A (p < 0.05), but remained unchanged in Group B throughout the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, HD patients lost hepatitis B immunity both after natural infection or vaccination, but naturally infected patients easily redeveloped protective anti-HBs titers. Anti-HBs titers decreased faster in vaccinated patients than in those with natural acquired immunity who held stable titers for a longer period. It is suggested that HD patients should be followed-up regularly for loss of HBV immunity after vaccination and receive a boosting dose when this occurs. In contrast, patients who acquired natural immunity do not need any anamnestic vaccination.