Lack of efficacy of topical capsaicin in serotonin-induced itch

Capsaicin (CAP) has been demonstrated to be an effective topical inhibitor of cutaneous vasodilatation, pain and pruritus induced by a variety of chemical and physical stimuli. In a previous study, we showed a significantly inhibitory effect of topical CAP treatment on histamine-induced itch and cutaneous vascular reactions in healthy subjects compared to atopic eczema patients. As serotonin is proposed to play a pathophysiological role in some types of pruritus (e.g. uremic and hepatic pruritus) and CAP has been described to be successful in hemodialysis-related pruritus, we investigated the antipruritic effect of topical CAP on serotonin-induced reactions in 10 healthy volunteers in comparison to untreated skin (UPS) and placebo substance (vehicle)-treated skin (VS). On the first day, serotonin iontophoresis was performed in untreated skin. One week later, the treatments started, using either CAP 0.05% liniment or a placebo liniment (vehicle) 3 times daily over a 5-day period. On day 6, serotonin was applied by iontophoresis within the pretreated skin. After another 1-week break, the treatments were performed vice versa on the corresponding infrascapular region. Weal and flare areas were planimetrically evaluated. Itch sensations were documentated by the volunteer on a scale over a 24-min follow-up period. The examination also comprised alloknesis, which stands for induction of perifocal sensations by usually non-itching stimuli. In CAP-treated skin, serotonin-induced wheals were significantly larger post-application compared to non-pretreated skin. Wheals were significantly larger in VS than in UPS. Comparison of serotonin-induced flares in the different study arms did not reveal any significant differences. Itch sensations were not significantly reduced by topical CAP application. The areas of alloknesis were smaller in capsaicin-treated skin compared to VS and UPS, but did not reach significant value. In conclusion, topical CAP application is not effective in serotonin-induced itching in healthy volunteers. Serotonin is most unlikely to play a role in the mechanism of action of CAP.     

The antipruritic effect of a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist (tropisetron) is dependent on mast cell depletion – an experimental study

The background of this study is that 5-HT3 receptor antagonists are reported to have an antipruritic effect in uremic and cholestatic pruritus. Recently, we could not confirm such an effect in healthy subjects under experimental conditions. Therefore, it was the aim of the present study to further evaluate a possible antipruritic effect of a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist (tropisetron) on serotonin- and histamine-induced itch before and after skin mast cell depletion in 10 healthy subjects. The results were compared to serotonin and histamine iontophoresis in non-pretreated and pretreated skin with an orally applied antihistamine (cetirizine). Skin mast cell depletion was performed by iontophoretical application of compound 48/80. Wheals and flares were planimetrically evaluated. Itching and burning sensations were rated on an analog scale over a 24-min period. The test protocol also comprised alloknesis, defined as induction of perifocal itch sensations by a mechanical stimulus. When serotonin was iontophoretically applied after mast cells had been depleted before, oral tropisetron resulted not only in significantly lower whealing, itching and alloknesis but also reduced flares. In contrast, after oral pretreatment with tropisetron histamine-induced reactions before and after mast cell depletion did not significantly change. Our study demonstrates that in this model, tropisetron as a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist does not effect histamine-induced itch but has a measurable effect in serotonin-induced reactions when mast cells were depleted before. From these data evidence now exists why tropisetron is to some extent effective in certain types of pruritus such as uremic pruritus, known for increased histamine liberation and increased serotonin levels as well as degranulated and diffusely spread mast cells in the skin.     

Recent studies of cutaneous nociception in atopic and non-atopic subjects

Itching reflects a distinct quality of cutaneous nociception elicited by chemical or other stimuli to neuronal receptors at the superficial layers of the skin and muco-cutaneous orifices. Although recent experimental studies of the conduction and perception of itch have yielded deeper insight into the physiology of this sensory quality, little is known about the neuromechanisms involved in pruritus accompanying many inflammatory skin diseases, in particular, in atopic eczema. Previous case-control studies of our research group with patients suffering from atopic eczema (AE) revealed significantly diminished itch perception after iontophoretic application of different doses of histamine as well as substance P (i.c. injected). Further experiments using acetylcholine (ACh, i.c.) clearly demonstrated that ACh elicits pruritus instead of pain in patients with AE. The first part of the present review deals with the results of our most recent case-control studies on histamine-induced itch perception in atopics devoid of eczema as well as in patients with urticaria or psoriasis compared to atopics with or without manifest eczema. We demonstrated that both focal itch and perifocal alloknesis (i.e., itch elicited by a slight mechanical, otherwise non-itching stimulus) were significantly reduced in eczema-free atopics yet were normal in non-atopics suffering from urticaria or psoriasis. In further studies using ACh i.c. injected into the uninvolved skin of patients with AE, lichen ruber, psoriasis, type IV contact eczema, or non-specific nummular eczema (n = 10/each group), all the atopics and 6/10 psoriatics felt itch instead of burning pain, but none of the others did. Different doses of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) i.c. applied to the controls and the atopics with or without eczema did not markedly increase the intensity of nociceptive sensations. However, ACh induced pain in the controls, pure pruritus in the atopics with acute eczema, and a 'mixture' of pain and itch in the atopics just free from eczema. Obviously, the quality of sensations evoked by ACh and VIP depends on the inflammatory or non-inflammatory state of the atopic skin. In a placebo-controlled, double blind study on histamine-induced focal itch and alloknesis with healthy subjects (n = 15) using naltrexone (opioid receptor antagonist) and cetirizine (H1-blocking agent), naltrexone was found to significantly reduce both itching and alloknesis. Cetirizine reduced focal itch but failed to influence the alloknesis phenomenon. The wheal and flare reaction was suppressed only by cetirizine. These different effects point to a mainly CNS-based activity of naltrexone but a peripheral level effect of cetirizine. Due to long-lasting experience with group sport as a supporting adjuvant for inpatients with AE, we evaluated, by clinical, psychometric, and physiological studies, the therapeutic efficacy of controlled physical exercise in addition to otherwise equal anti-eczematous therapy for both voluntary participants and non-participants in sports by performing several case-control studies, one followed-up to 6 months after the patients' discharge from the hospital. Regular moderate exercises neither deteriorated nor impeded the recovery from AE, ameliorated the participants' scratch controlling ability and significantly their depressed emotional mood. The non-participants failed to achieve these aims. Sweating-induced itch was inhibited in almost all participants if simple skin care (clearing by warm shower, ointment) and short-term rest were used by informed patients. In conclusion, there are several indications that itching is elicited in individuals inclined to cutaneous atopy, regardless of their eczematous or just eczema-free state, by a different physiological pathway from that in non-atopic individuals. Therefore, antipruritic agents influencing the centrally altered nociception of atopics are needed and may be expected in near future. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)     

Polidocanol inhibits cowhage ‐ but not histamine‐induced itch in humans

Polidocanol is a local anaesthetic and antipruritic compound that is used in the treatment of itching skin conditions such as eczema. Its mechanisms of action are largely ill defined. This study has compared the antipruritic efficacy of topical polidocanol in histamine‐induced itch and a histamine‐independent, cowhage‐induced model of pruritus. Polidocanol (3%) or vehicle was applied topically under occlusion for 1 h to the forearms of 45 healthy volunteers before itch was provoked by rubbing in 40–45 spicules of cowhage or skin prick testing with 10 mg/ml histamine. Itch was recorded at 1‐min intervals for 30 min on a 100‐mm visual analogue scale. Polidocanol significantly reduced the area under the curve for cowhage‐induced itch by 58% (P < 0.05), but had no significant effect on histamine‐induced itch. This result underlines the importance of histamine‐independent itch models in the development of topical antipruritic agents.     

Administration of acetylcholine and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide to atopic eczema patients

Responses to acetylcholine (ACh) and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) were investigated in atopic eczema (AE) patients. To elucidate the involvement of histamine to ACh-provoked vasoreactions and sensations, we applied a selective H1-antagonist (cetirizine) 3 h prior to the ACh-administration. Solutions of acetylcholine (ACh, 0.55 M) and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP, 1.5x 10(-5) M) were injected (10 microl) intracutaneously into the volar forearm of 14 healthy subjects and 14 atopic eczema (AE) patients. The substances were applied as single stimulus as well as in combination. Sensations evoked by the stimulation were recorded using 2 visual analog scales (VAS). Vasoreactions were analyzed with the new technique of computer assisted video image analysis. With this method we measured the dynamics of the flare development and the extension of the final flare size independent of the observer's assessment. In control subjects the development and extension of the final flare size was almost similar, regardless whether ACh and VIP were applied in combination or separately. Compared to healthy controls, after injection of ACh, VIP and the combination of VIP and ACh smaller flare sizes were recorded in AE patients. After VIP was given, the control subjects reported pruritus, which was significantly augmented compared to AE patients. In contrast, controls reported a burning pain after the injection of ACh, whereas AE patients felt predominantly pruritus. Itch sensation after the combined application of VIP and ACh was significantly elevated in AE patients. Consequently, we assume that mediators of sudomotor neurons, i.e., VIP and ACh meet in AE patients apparently sensitized nociceptive primary afferents and induce exaggerated itch, pain and flare responses. When pretreated with the selective H1-antagonist cetirizine before ACh was injected, pain and erythema due to ACh was diminished in healthy controls. In contrast, cetirizine did not influence the size of erythema and the magnitude of sensation in AE patients. We conclude, that the release of histamine is not involved in ACh-induced erythema and pruritus in AE. These data provide evidence that pruritus can be elicited in atopic eczema by a cholinergic, histamine independent mechanism.     

Skin reactions and itch sensation induced by epicutaneous histamine application in atopic dermatitis and controls

Itch sensations and skin reactions induced by histamine iontophoresis at six different current intensities were studied in 27 atopic dermatitis (AD) patients and 20 healthy controls. Subjective itch ratings were assessed on a visual analogue scale (VAS) for 8-min periods after 10-sec histamine application, while changes of skin blood flow were simultaneously measured using two Laser Doppler flowmeters. Ten minutes after each histamine application, the areas of wheal and flare reactions were planimetrically evaluated. When no or weak current was applied, AD patients revealed stronger wheal and flare reactions than controls, possibly due to disturbed skin barrier function. Higher histamine doses, however, produced weaker subjective and vascular reactions in AD patients. In contrast to the controls, AD patients were unable to distinguish between weak and strong histamine stimulation, as shown by their VAS ratings. These results imply that AD patients have an altered histamine response. In particular, their afferent cutaneous nerve fibers show a decreased ability to signal itching to the central nervous system and to release vasoactive neuropeptides upon histamine stimulation.     

Antipruritic effects of two different 5-HT3 receptor antagonists and an antihistamine in haemodialysis patients

Pruritus is the most distressing symptom in haemodialysis (HD) patients. Its aetiology has not yet been delineated, and thus there are no good therapeutical options. Case reports and series attribute antipruritic potency to the serotonin receptor antagonists of the 5-HT3 type in renal pruritus. It was the aim of this study to investigate the antipruritic effect of two different 5-HT3 receptor antagonists and an antihistamine in 11 patients undergoing HD. Pruritus was induced by iontophoresis with serotonin and histamine and recorded before and after HD. These data were compared to those obtained after oral pretreatment with the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists tropisetron 5 mg and ondansetron 8 mg and the antihistamine cetirizine 10 mg. Ten healthy volunteers served as a control group. Vasocutaneous parameters (wheal and flare), skin temperature and alloknesis were also determined. Itching in HD patients and controls was not significantly diminished by oral pretreatment with the serotonin receptor antagonists. In controls, but not in HD patients, cetirizine significantly reduced itching, skin temperature and vasocutaneous parameters. Our data additionally demonstrate that there are no significant differences in vasocutaneous parameters, itching and alloknesis in HD patients before and after dialysis. We conclude that 5-HT3 receptor blockers such as tropisetron and ondansetron and the antihistamine cetirizine do not sufficiently reduce serotonin- and histamine-induced itching in haemodialyis patients.     

Efficacy of naltrexone on acetylcholine-induced alloknesis in atopic eczema

Atopic eczema (AE) is a chronically pruritic inflammatory skin disease. Although the mediators and exact mechanisms eliciting and sustaining pruritus are not completely known, AE patients in clinical trials have been shown to benefit under treatment with morphine antagonists. Naltrexone (NAL) is a relatively pure morphine antagonist that blocks the effects of opioids twice as much as naloxone. NAL exhibits minimal pharmacological activity and displaces endorphines at mu- and kappa-receptors without its own intrinsic activity. NAL's excellent oral bioavailability and linear increases in the area under plasma concentration-time curve make it ideal for use in experimental studies. We designed our present experiments similar to former experiments evaluating both peripheral cutaneous sensations and central itch procession in order to gain more information about the possible distribution of opioid receptors and their involvement in the pathophysiology of pruritus. Eleven AE patients participated in our double-blind study. Either 25 mg of NAL (Nemexin) or a placebo (PLA) was given to the participants 60 min prior to the acetylcholine (ACH) injection [intracutaneous (i.c.) injection of 0.02 ml of 0.55 M]. A PLA stimulus with buffered saline served as control on the opposite forearm. We used laser Doppler flowmetry to measure the vasomotoric changes after ACH injection and recorded the duration and intensity of itch with a visual analogue scale (VAS). Following the evaluation of wheal and flare sensation, we obtained the area of itchy skin around the injection site (alloknesis) by gently stroking the surrounding skin with a brush in the centripetal direction towards the injection site. The results were planimetrically evaluated. Oral NAL reduced the perifocal itch significantly (P < 0.009). In four of our observations the area of alloknesis completely disappeared. Itch duration was reduced by 20 s and the intensity of itch was diminished, yet not significantly. NAL had no significant effects on cholinergic vasoreactions measured by the laser Doppler (P > 0.50) and especially failed to decrease the initial flux response, which is a typical sign of an altered vascular reaction (P > 0.25). The decrease of wheal (P = 0.008) and flare (P = 0.01) extension indicates an appropriate dosage of our treatment for this experiment. The most significant effects of NAL were observed in parameters of itch processing such as alloknesis (P = 0.009) and flare extension (P = 0.01). Therefore we favour the concept that NAL might have a stronger impact on central nervous mechanisms than on peripheral nociceptive structures.     

Acetylcholine Is an Inducer of Itching in Patients with Atopic Eczema

As previous experimental studies disproved histamine as the main mediator of eliciting pruritus in atopic eczema (AE), we examined the neurocutaneous sensations in 15 patients with AE and in 15 age- and sex-matched non-atopic controls after i.c. injection of acetylcholine (Ach, 0.5 M, 20 μl) or buffered saline. The sensory perceptions were rated by the participants of the study with regard to their quality and intensity using a visual analogue scale. Simultaneously, the vascular reactions to Ach were recorded by the examinators via laser Doppler fluxmetry as well as flare and wheal planimetry. In contrast to the approximately equal flare and wheal extensions in either group, the cutaneous sensations differed significantly. The patients complained of ‘pure’ itching that developed shortly after Ach injection, whereas the control subjects reported only burning pain. Moreover, the patients perceived their sensations significantly earlier and significantly longer than did the controls. The study provides evidence that Ach plays an important role in the pathogeny of pruritus in patients with AE. Further investigations of the neuronal mechanisms involved in this atopy-related effect of Ach have to be performed.     

Doxepin affects acetylcholine induced cutaneous reactions in atopic eczema

BACKGROUND: Atopic eczema (AE) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with strong itching as the prominent symptom. The pathology of itch is still in discussion, but acetylcholine (ACH) seems to be a relevant pruritogenic mediator in AE. Since efficient benefit on pruritus and excoriations has been demonstrated with tricyclic agents, we investigated how the topical treatment with doxepin (5%, Boehringer Standard, Mannheim, Germany), a tricyclic compound with anticholinergic properties, may influence ACH induced itch and cutaneous sensations (erythema, wheal, axonreflex flare). METHODS: Eleven patients with AE were included in this double blind study. For 3 days we applied doxepin cream to a defined area on the volar forearm and basic ointment to the other side 4 times daily. On day 4, ACH and sodium chloride were i.c. injected into the pretreated arms. Vasoreactions and cutaneous sensations were measured similar to studies described in previous publications from our group. RESULTS: Doxepin treatment over 3 days reduced ACH provoked flare size more than 53% (P<0.005) and wheal size about 48% (P<0.005) whereas the maximal antipruritic effect was similiar to the basic therapy. The itch intensity, which is expressed as the mean AUC value, was rated at 6.12 arbitrary units after the neutral cream application and 5.9 arbitrary units after doxepin. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical and experimental effectiveness of doxepin as an antipruritic drug has been known for years. However, studies focusing on ACH as a pruritogenic mediator have not been performed. The duration of the doxepin application in our study seems to be appropriate since flare and wheal development were diminished. The reason why doxepin did not develop more antipruritic action compared to the vehicle cream may be due to the fact that the doxepin free cream already possessed an antipruritic action in this experimental study design. This is probably caused by rehydrating and moisturizing effects.     

Anti pruritic effects of topical crotamiton, capsaicin, and a corticosteroid on pruritogen-induced scratching behavior

Itch accompanies various skin diseases. As a number of mediators other than histamine can be involved in the itch sensation, H1 receptor antagonists are not necessarily effective in treating itch. External application of antipruritic drugs is occasionally used as an alternative therapy for pruritic skin conditions, such as pruritus on primary non-diseased, non-inflamed skin. Even so, the actual effects of these drugs on the itch sensation have yet to be studied in detail. To verify the antipruritic effects of crotamiton, capsaicin, and a corticosteroid on the itch sensation, we examined the inhibitory effects of these drugs on various pruritogen-induced scratching behaviors in mice. Topical application of 10% crotamiton moderately inhibited histamine-, serotonin-, and PAR-2 agonist-induced scratching behaviors. Topical capsaicin (0.025%) also exerted a moderate suppressive effect on histamine-, substance P-, and PAR-2 agonist-induced itch responses. Notably, topical corticosteroid (0.05% clobetasol propionate) remarkably inhibited the scratching behaviors induced by all of the pruritogenic agents tested. Therapeutic effects of capsaicin on substance P-induced pruritus did not seem to be mediated by desensitization of the TRPV1 (+) C fibers and/or by altered responsiveness of the mast cells. In addition, the antipruritic effects of crotamiton and corticosteroid appear to be, at least partly, associated with a TRPV1-independent pathway. This study examined the itch responses to pruritogens and demonstrated the mode of action of the externally applied antipruritic drugs.     

Neuronal sensitization for histamine-induced itch in lesional skin of patients with atopic dermatitis

OBJECTIVE: Lowered threshold of neurons (ie, neuronal sensitization) in atopic dermatitis was investigated by testing sensitivity to histamine. DESIGN: Comparative study. SETTING: A dermatological clinic and a research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Eighteen patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) and 6 patients with chronic plaque-type psoriasis as well as 14 healthy control subjects. INTERVENTIONS: Histamine prick was performed in lesional and nonlesional skin of patients and in control subjects. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Axon reflex flare and wheal were measured planimetrically, and the itch intensity was rated on a numerical scale (0-10). RESULTS: In nonlesional skin of patients with AD, itch intensity and axon reflex flare were both significantly smaller compared with controls (mean +/- SEM maximum itch, 1.5 +/- 0.3 vs 3.1 +/- 0.2 [P<.05]; mean +/- SEM diameter, 12.3 +/- 2.0 vs 25.3 +/- 2.5 mm [P<.01]). In lesional skin of patients with AD, on the contrary, massive itch was provoked (maximum itch, 4.4 +/- 0.3), although flare was relatively small (diameter, 16.1 +/- 3.4 mm). Itch ratings in patients with psoriasis were low both in lesional and nonlesional skin (maximum itch, 1.3 +/- 0.6 and 1.0 +/- 0.4, respectively). CONCLUSION: As the area of axon reflex flare is an indirect measure of activity in primary afferent neurons, our results suggest a decreased activation of peripheral pruriceptors in patients with AD. The massively increased itch in lesional skin of patients with AD might therefore be based on sensitization for itch in the spinal cord rather than in primary afferent neurons. This sensitization does not appear to be simply based on skin inflammation because histamine-induced itch was not augmented in lesional skin of psoriasis.     

Patients' perception of itch induced by histamine, compound 48/80 and wool fibres in atopic dermatitis.

Itch and flare responses were investigated in 32 patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) and in 32 healthy controls. Itch was induced chemically by intradermal injections of histamine (1, 3.3, 10 and 100 micrograms/ml) and compound 48/80 (10 micrograms/ml) into non-lesional skin and mechanically by wearing a woollen sweater. Continuous recording of itch intensity allowed the calculation of itch duration (ID), maximal itch intensity (Imax) and a "total itch index" (Tii). The itch responses were significantly increased in AD patients compared with controls for wool fibres and one of the histamine concentrations (10 micrograms/ml), but not for the remaining three histamine concentrations or compound 48/80. Conversely, the flare response was significantly smaller in AD patients than in controls for the two strongest histamine solutions and compound 48/80. Significant dose-response relationships were found between histamine concentration and each of ID, Imax, Tii and flare in both patients and controls. The slope of the flare-regression line was significantly steeper in controls than in AD patients, whereas the slopes of the itch-regression lines did not differ significantly between the two groups, i.e. their ability to discriminate between weak and strong histamine concentrations did not differ significantly. No increased skin mast cell releasability in vivo to compound 48/80 was shown in AD patients compared with controls. The itch and flare responses of AD patients did not correlate significantly with clinical itch intensity, eczema score or serum IgE level.     

Topically applied aspirin decreases histamine-induced wheal and flare reactions in normal and SLS-inflamed skin,but does not decrease itch. A randomized,double-blind and placebo-controlled human study

Topically applied aspirin has recently been reported to decrease histamine-induced itch in human volunteers. Our aim is to confirm this and to study the antipruritic ability of topical aspirin in inflamed skin. In 24 non-atopic volunteers, an inflammatory skin reaction was induced in forearm skin at 5 different sites by sodium lauryl sulphate contained in Finn Chambers. Aspirin 10%, aspirin 1%, mepyramine 5% and vehicle were applied to the inflamed and corresponding non-inflamed areas 20 min before itch induction with intradermal histamine injection. Itch and pain were scored on a visual analogue scale at regular intervals. Wheal and flare areas were measured. No difference in itch intensities was found after application of aspirin, mepyramine and vehicle, but more itch was induced in aspirin and mepyramine pretreated sites in inflamed skin compared to normal skin (p<0.05). In normal skin, flare areas were smaller after pretreatment with aspirin 10% (p<0.05) and mepyramine (p<0.001), as were wheal areas after mepyramine (p<0.01), compared to vehicle pretreatments. In inflamed skin, flare areas were smaller after pretreatment with aspirin 10% (p<0.01) and mepyramine (p<0.001), as were wheal areas after aspirin 10% (p<0.01), aspirin 1% (p<0.05) and mepyramine (p<0.001). We conclude that despite a significant skin penetration as measured by the influence on wheal and flare reactions, topically applied aspirin did not decrease histamine-induced itch in the model used.     

Correlations between histamine-induced wheal,flare and itch

Correlations between the skin reactions wheal and flare and the subjectively reported degree of itch were investigated in response to 1% histamine, intradermally applied by standardized skin prick and by iontophoresis. Experiments were performed with 15 male volunteers using a threefold repeated measures design (skin prick, and iontophoresis with 0.13 mA for 10 s and with 2.0 mA for 10 s). Skin reactions (perpendicular diameters) were determined at the time of their maximum (10 min). Itch was rated on a computerized visual analogue scale which was anchored upon the individual scratch threshold. Most effective in producing itch was the skin prick which caused strong sensations markedly above the scratch threshold during the entire period of measurement (30 min), whereas iontophoresis induced only transient itch sensations. On the other hand, the largest wheals were generated by iontophoresis of both intensities (mean 10 or 14 mm vs 6 mm with skin prick). The higher current induced higher itch, wheal and flare responses, but after eliminating this effect of stimulus intensity, no correlations were found. In contrast, skin prick-induced flare reactions varied with the degree of itch above the scratch threshold ( r = 0.56; P < 0.01). Repeated measurements showed a higher stability for the itch reaction with skin prick compared with iontophoresis. It is hypothesized that in iontophoresis the brief (10-s) histamine bolus passed the most superficial pruritoceptive C fibres too quickly to induce long-lasting itch sensations, whereas the skin prick caused a deposit at the dermal-epidermal junction releasing histamine during the entire time of measurement. Consequently, both the C fibre-mediated itch and the axon reflex flare were more pronounced with the skin prick, and the wheal resulting from a permeability increase in the postcapillary venule walls was an independent phenomenon. Received: 21 June 1995     

Strontium nitrate decreased histamine-induced itch magnitude and duration in man

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated that strontium salts have a potent and broad ability to suppress sensory irritation. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the possible antipruritic effects of topical strontium salts, we conducted a double-blind randomized study to evaluate the effect of 20% strontium nitrate on itch magnitude (intensity) and duration. METHODS: In 8 human subjects, strontium nitrate was applied to the volar forearm and vehicle control to the contralateral volar forearm for 30 min; both substances were reapplied for an additional 5 min. Itch was then experimentally induced by intradermal injection of histamine. Itch magnitude was rated each minute for the first 20 min using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Itch duration in minutes was also recorded. RESULTS: Strontium nitrate, in comparison to its vehicle control, significantly shortened itch duration from 28.1+/-5.4 min (mean +/- SEM) to 18.5+/-4.2 min (p<0.01) and reduced itch magnitude at time points 12-20 min and overall (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Strontium nitrate may act as a topical antipruritic agent in reducing histamine-mediated itch.     

Screening topical antipruritics: a histamine-induced itch human model

Itch is a subjective symptom; its magnitude (intensity) may be only estimated by the reports of patients or volunteers. We utilized a comparative screening method to identify and quantify the efficacy of topical antipruritics with a histamine-induced itch human model. Ten individuals responsive to histamine-induced itch sensation were enrolled. Both forearms served as test sites. Each test site was treated randomly either by histamine injection only or pretreated with a coded candidate formula for 30 min and then a histamine injection. Itch was experimentally induced in each test site by the intracutaneous injection of 100 microg histamine dihydrochloride dissolved in 1 ml normal saline. Itch magnitude was measured each minute after histamine injection for 20 min with a magnitude visual analogue scale. Itch duration was also recorded. Formulation D significantly (p < 0.05) decreased itch magnitude (within a 20-min test period), from 2.6 +/- 2.1 cm (mean +/- SD) to 2.2 +/- 2.1 cm (mean +/- SD) when compared to its vehicle control; it also significantly (p < 0.05) shortened itch duration (15.0 +/- 7.4 min; mean +/- SD) in comparison with its vehicle control (20.3 +/- 7.0 min; mean +/- SD). Of all the formulations tested, formulation D was the most effective antipruritic in decreasing histamine-induced itch. This method may act as a simple and robust screening procedure when evaluating potential antipruritics and allow a comparison among products. Until validated with disease-induced itch, e.g., atopic dermatitis, the model should be considered screening in nature.     

Reactions to intradermally injected substance P and topically applied mustard oil in atopic dermatitis patients.

Skin reactions and itch or burning pain sensations following intradermal injection of the neuropeptide substance P and topical application of the substance P releasing agent mustard oil were studied in 20 atopic dermatitis patients and 20 healthy controls. Changes in skin blood flow were measured with a Laser Doppler flowmeter. Areas of wheal and flare reactions were evaluated planimetrically. Simultaneous with Laser Doppler flowmeter measurements, subjective itch and burning pain ratings were verbally reported on a category partitioning scale at 10-second intervals. Substance P evoked dose-dependent wheal, flare, and itch reactions in both patients and controls. However, substance P doses of 10(-9) -10(-11) mol elicited smaller flares in patients than in the controls whereas the wheal sizes were similar in both groups. Substance P-induced itch ratings were lower in patients at a dose of 10(-10) mol, and the onset of itching was delayed at all substance P levels applied. Mustard oil elicited similar neurogenic inflammatory reactions in both groups, although pain sensations were significantly delayed in atopic dermatitis patients at two mustard oil concentrations, which is further indication of a desensitization of afferent nerve endings contributing to the neurogenic inflammatory reactions in the skin of these patients.     

Antipruritic and thermal sensation effects of hydrocortisone creams in human skin

Few studies evaluate the effect of topical corticosteroids on thermal sensation and in alleviation of itch produced by intradermal injection of histamine. We evaluated the antipruritic effect of hydrocortisone (1% and 2.5%) on histamine-induced itch and sensory effects by measuring itch magnitude, itch duration and thermal thresholds using a computerized thermal sensory analyzer (TSA). This was a double-blind, random, comparative, controlled, single-dose and single-center study. Itch was experimentally induced in both forearms by intracutaneous injection of histamine in 18 subjects. Hydrocortisone 1%, 2.5% and placebo were applied to test sites on both forearms. The thermal threshold for warmth sensation, cold sensation, cold and heat pain was measured with the TSA. Itch magnitude was measured each minute after histamine injection for 10 min with a visual analogue scale (VAS). Itch duration was also recorded. In comparison to placebo, 2.5% hydrocortisone significantly (p = 0.03) reduced itch duration from 12.6 +/- 11.0 min (mean +/- SD) to 8.6 +/- 8.2 min (the reducing rate was 32%) as well as itch magnitude (at minutes 3, 6, 7 and overall). Placebo, 1% and 2.5% hydrocortisone significantly altered (p <0.05) the cold sensation threshold. No treatment altered cold or heat pain thresholds. These data suggest that topical application of 2.5% hydrocortisone may be significantly beneficial for the treatment of histamine-induced itch. The correlation between thermal measurements and antipruritic effects warrants further study.     

Electrode design for skin electroporation with minimal nerve stimulation

Itch is one of the major symptoms of various skin diseases. Although specific neuronal pathways for itch were identified both peripherally and centrally, they still fail to explain itchy skin observed in patients with chronic pruritus. In this study, sensitivity to itchy and painful stimuli in patients with atopic dermatitis was investigated. Histamine-prick evoked enormous itch in their lesional skin, while less itch in their non-lesional skin than healthy subjects. Flare reaction was not significantly different between their non-lesional and lesional skin, rather smaller than healthy subjects. Mechanical (pin-pricks), electrical, heat and chemical (injection of pH3 solution) stimuli evoked intense itch in their lesional skin and partly also in their non-lesional skin, while only pain in healthy subjects. Itch was also, but not intensely, evoked in healthy subjects by injection of pH3 solution after sufficient histamine stimuli. These results confirm the presence of itchy skin with hyperkinesis (excessive itch by itchy stimuli) and allokinesis (itch by non-itchy stimuli) in patients with atopic dermatitis, which is so intense that painful stimuli cannot suppress but evoke itch, and suggest that neuronal sensitization is involved in their itch not only peripherally but also centrally.