Cost-effectiveness of early intervention with once-daily budesonide in children with mild persistent asthma: results from the START study

The inhaled Steroid Treatment As Regular Therapy in early asthma (START) study has shown that early intervention with inhaled budesonide in mild persistent asthma improves clinical outcomes in both adults and children. The aim of this study was to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness of early treatment with budesonide Turbuhaler in children aged 5–10 yr who participated in START. Direct and indirect costs associated with asthma were determined for 1974 children participating in the double-blind, 3-year part of the study. Randomization was to placebo or to budesonide 200  μ g once daily in each case in addition to usual asthma care. Cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated from the healthcare payer's and societal perspectives (using US prices). The addition of once-daily budesonide therapy to usual asthma care was associated with 16 additional symptom-free days (SFDs) per child over the 3-yr period (p < 0.001), with a substantial reduction (50%) in the mean number of days spent in hospital, and with reduced frequency of emergency room visits and missed school and caregiver work days. From the healthcare payer's perspective (direct costs), the increase in mean direct cost over 3 yr with budesonide was $169, which translated into an incremental cost of early intervention with budesonide in children of $10.50 (95% CI $1.20–33.30) per SFD gained. From the societal perspective, there was a cost reduction over 3 yr of $192 with budesonide relative to placebo. From a societal perspective, budesonide was therefore dominant. In conclusion, early intervention with once-daily budesonide added to usual asthma care in children with mild persistent asthma is cost-saving from a societal perspective and is acceptably cost-effective when viewed from a healthcare payer perspective.     

Effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroids in controlling acute asthma exacerbations in children at home

Many clinicians advise their patients to increase the dose of inhaled corticosteroids during acute asthma exacerbations, without strong clinical evidence supporting this treatment. This study investigates the effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroids in controlling acute asthma exacerbations in children at home. The study population consisted of children with mild intermittent, mild and moderate persistent asthma aged 1 to 14 years who were treated in our outpatient clinic with inhaled budesonide for 1 year. After participating in an asthma education session, the parents were instructed to initiate treatment with inhaled budesonide at the first signs of asthma exacerbation, starting with 200 to 400 microg budesonide, in combination with beta-2 agonists 4 times a day and followed by a decrease in the dose in 4 to 8 days. Asthma status and peak expiratory flow rates were measured in the 3 monthly follow-up visits. Only children who complied with the treatment regimen and came for follow-up visits regularly were included in the final analysis. One hundred fifty children used our treatment protocol with inhaled budesonide to control their asthma attacks. Clinical improvement of asthma symptoms was achieved after a mean of 1.8 +/- 0.7 days from the beginning of treatment. The parents were able to control 94% of the 1,061 episodes of asthma exacerbation occurring during a cumulative follow-up period of 239 years. In the 3-month period before enrollment, 101 children (67%) had used oral corticosteroids to control their asthma attacks and 50 (33%) were hospitalized. During the entire follow-up period, only 11 children (7%) used oral corticosteroids, and none of the children were hospitalized. The present study demonstrates that children with asthma can control their exacerbations at home using inhaled corticosteroids (budesonide). Treatment, starting with relatively high doses followed by a rapid reduction in dose over 4-8 days, resulted in a decrease in the use of oral steroids and in hospitalization. To achieve good results, patient compliance is essential.     

Low-dose theophylline in childhood asthma: a placebo-controlled, double-blind study

Regular anti-inflammatory treatment is essential in treating persistent asthma. Most commonly, inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are used. However, especially in children, there is concern about the long-term safety of ICS such that doses should be kept to a minimum. The use of theophylline has decreased because of frequent side-effects in therapeutic doses. In adults, there have been reports about an immunomodulatory effect of low-dose theophylline. To study the clinical and immunomodulatory effect in children, 36 patients (mean age 12.5 SD 2.4 years) with moderate, persistent asthma on regular ICS were recruited into a placebo-controlled, double-blind study. After a 6-week run-in period, patients received either theophylline 10 mg/kg bodyweight or placebo for 12 weeks. Diary cards, lung function, peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations and serum eosinophil cationic protein (sECP) were assessed. In the treatment group, mean serum theophylline was 7.1 mg/l. There was no change in symptoms or use of rescue medication. Mean (SD) peak expiratory flow (PEF) increased from 86% (24) to 95% (18) predicted. sECP decreased from 43.2 μg/l (32.5) to 26.5 μg/l (16.9) (p = 0.02). Lymphocyte subpopulations did not change. The study failed to show a beneficial clinical or an immunomodulatory effect of theophylline when used in low doses. These results do not support a more important role of theophylline in the long-term treatment of moderate childhood asthma.     

Current concepts in asthma treatment in children

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to present current literature related to the management of childhood asthma. RECENT FINDINGS: Persistent asthma is now considered an inflammatory airways disease. Inhaled corticosteroids are recognized as the preferred long-term control medication. New classes of medications have been introduced during the last 5 years, including leukotriene modifiers, long-acting beta-adrenergic agonists, combination inhaled corticosteroids with long-acting beta-adrenergic agonists, and anti-IgE. Research is also being directed to understand the early onset of asthma. SUMMARY: Management of childhood asthma is now being directed to early recognition and early intervention. Recent updates in the asthma guidelines prompt clinicians to consider intervention with antiinflammatory therapy, preferably inhaled corticosteroids, in children who have frequent asthma exacerbations and a risk profile for persistent asthma. In children with persistent asthma, inhaled corticosteroids are recognized as the preferred antiinflammatory therapy. Health care systems that have adapted this approach have recognized the benefits of reduced hospitalizations and urgent care visits. Continued research is needed to identify asthma at a very early stage so that interventions can be directed to interrupting the development of this disease.     

Montelukast vs. inhaled low-dose budesonide as monotherapy in the treatment of mild persistent asthma: a randomized double blind controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend daily controller therapy for mild persistent asthma. Montelukast has demonstrated consistent benefit in controlling symptoms of asthma and may be an alternative, orally administered, nonsteroidal agent for treating mild asthma. Aim: To determine whether montelukast is as effective as budesonide in controlling mild persistent asthma as determined by FEV(1). METHODS: Between November 2003 to October 2005, participants aged 5-15 years with recently diagnosed mild persistent asthma (n = 62) were randomized to oral montelukast (5 mg daily) [N(1) = 30] or inhaled budesonide (400 microg per day in two doses) [N(2) = 32] in a single center, double-blind study. RESULTS: Baseline demographic and spirometric parameters were comparable. The median (95% confidence interval) percentage predicted FEV(1) was similar in the two groups after 12 weeks of treatment (budesonide: 76.70 (67.96-90.53%), montelukast: 75 (67.40-88.47)%; p = 0.44). There was similar improvement in spirometric parameters and clinical symptom scores in both the groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the need for rescue drugs as well as side effects reported by parents. CONCLUSION: Montelukast is as effective as inhaled budesonide in the treatment of mild persistent asthma in children aged 5-15 years. Montelukast may be used as an alternative to low dose inhaled corticosteroids for management of mild persistent asthma.     

Benefits of a school-based asthma treatment program in the absence of secondhand smoke exposure: results of a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Daily maintenance medications are recommended for all children with mild persistent to severe persistent asthma; however, poor adherence to these medications is common. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of school-based provision of inhaled corticosteroids on asthma severity among urban children with mild persistent to severe persistent asthma. DESIGN: Children aged 3 to 7 years with mild persistent to severe persistent asthma were identified at the start of the 2000-2001 and 2001-2002 school years in Rochester. Children were assigned randomly to a school-based care group (daily inhaled corticosteroids provided through the school) or a usual-care group (inhaled corticosteroids not given through school). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Improvement in parent-reported symptom-free days. RESULTS: Of 242 eligible children, 184 were enrolled from 54 urban schools. Data for 180 children were available. Parents of children in the school-based care group had a greater improvement in quality of life compared with parents of children in the usual-care group (change score, 0.63 vs 0.24; P =.047); also, children in the school-based care group vs the usual-care group missed less school because of asthma (mean total days missed, 6.8 vs 8.8; P =.047) and experienced more symptom-free days during the early winter months (mean days per 2-week period, 9.2 vs 7.3; P =.02). A post hoc analysis revealed that all significant findings were produced by differences among children who were not exposed to secondhand smoke. Furthermore, among children not exposed to smoke, those in the school-based care group vs the usual-care group had more symptom-free days overall (11.5 vs 10.5; P =.046), had fewer days needing rescue medications (1.6 vs 2.3; P =.03), and were less likely to have had 3 or more acute visits for asthma (6 [13%] of 47 children vs 17 [31%] of 54 children; P =.03). CONCLUSIONS: School-based provision of inhaled corticosteroids significantly improved symptoms, quality of life, and absenteeism among urban children with mild persistent to severe persistent asthma. This effect was seen only among children not exposed to secondhand smoke.     

Low‐dose budesonide improves exercise‐induced bronchospasm in schoolchildren

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of low‐dose inhaled budesonide (once or twice daily) and placebo, administered via Turbuhaler^®, on exercise‐induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in children with mild asthma. Fifty‐seven steroid‐naive children (7–16 years old; 41 boys, 16 girls) with EIB participated in this sub‐population study according to the following inclusion criterion: a maximum fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s ( FEV ₁) ≥ 10% after a standardized treadmill test. Mean baseline FEV ₁ was 100.3% of predicted, and mean maximum fall in FEV ₁ after the standardized exercise test was 22%. The study was a double‐blind, randomized, parallel‐group design. After 2 weeks of run‐in, the children received inhaled budesonide 100 µg or 200 µg once daily in the morning, 100 µg twice daily, or placebo, for 12 weeks. After 12 weeks of treatment, the fall in FEV ₁ after the exercise test was significantly less in all three budesonide groups (7.2–7.8%) vs. placebo (16.7%). Daytime symptom scores were significantly lower in all three budesonide groups compared with placebo (p < 0.02). The three budesonide groups did not differ significantly, and no significant change in lung function was found in any group. Therefore children with mild asthma, but with significant EIB, improved their exercise tolerance and symptom control after 3 months of treatment with a low dose of inhaled budesonide given once or twice daily.     

Steroid therapy for asthma in children

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To highlight studies that have contributed significantly to our current knowledge of inhaled glucocorticoids in childhood asthma. RECENT FINDINGS: In 2006, three important studies were published that investigated whether inhaled glucocorticoid therapy, if started soon after the onset of asthma symptoms, could alter the subsequent course of the disease. Several studies focused on the comparative clinical efficacy of inhaled glucocorticoids to leukotriene receptor antagonists in children with mild to moderate asthma. Although the Expert Panel had recommended inhaled glucocorticoid therapy as the preferred long-term controller with persistent asthma, there were no specific studies comparing these two classes of long-term controller medications in children. Another topic of significant clinical interest was the comparative efficacy of inhaled glucocorticoid to systemic glucocorticoids in the treatment of acute asthma. The question was answered in a study published in children with mild to moderate acute asthma. Lastly, the safety of inhaled glucocorticoid therapy was also evaluated in preschool children. SUMMARY: Inhaled glucocorticoids are the preferred long-term controller for initiating treatment of persistent asthma. Early intervention with inhaled glucocorticoids achieves symptom control but does not alter the natural history of asthma. Inhaled glucocorticoids are not as effective as systemic glucocorticoids for managing acute asthma exacerbations.     

The effect of nebulized budesonide treatment in children with mild to moderate exacerbations of asthma

Background: The role of inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of acute asthma remains a controversial subject. Objective and methods: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel-group clinical trial on the effect of a 5-d course of nebulized budesonide treatment in children with mild to moderate exacerbation of asthma was performed. The need for systemic corticosteroid intervention was evaluated as the primary outcome measure. Results: Sixty-seven children aged 6 to 15 y were enrolled. During the emergency department phase, they received three nebulizations of either budesonide(1 mg/dose) or placebo, and then in the home phase of the study, they continued their study medications twice a day for another 4 d. Though the level of improvement in the emergency department phase was similar between the groups given either budesonide or placebo treatments (6.8±1.9% vs 4.0±1.5%, p=0.30, respectively), nebulized budesonide caused a trend towards a benefit in terms of the need for systemic corticosteroid intervention (2/33 vs 7/34, p=0.07), but not in secondary outcome measures.

Conclusion: Though we show a tendency towards a benefit with nebulized budesonide in children with mild to moderate exacerbations in terms of prevention of progression of the illness, the documented benefit is small and includes, at least, consideration for clinical significance, cost-effectiveness, impracticality and safety.     

孟鲁司特治疗儿童支气管哮喘的临床疗效观察

目的孟鲁司特联合布地奈德气雾剂吸入治疗合并过敏性鼻炎的轻、中度哮喘儿童临床疗效的前瞻性研究。方法将80例合并有过敏性鼻炎的轻、中度哮喘儿童随机分为治疗组和对照组。治疗组在吸入布地奈德气雾剂的同时加用孟鲁司特片,对照组则在吸入布地奈德气雾剂基础上加安慰剂,其余治疗相同。两组布地奈德气雾剂递减至最适有效剂量(无哮喘症状体征,β2激动剂吸入量无增加,呼气峰流速达预计值的80%以上,或变异率小于20%),并进行统计学分析。结果治疗组在加用孟鲁司特前后布地奈德吸入量减少差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),对照组在加用安慰剂前后布地奈德吸入量减少差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而且两组比较差异亦有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论孟鲁司特片联合布地奈德气雾剂治疗儿童合并过敏性鼻炎的哮喘,不仅能明显缓解哮喘和鼻炎的症状,还可以减少糖皮质激素、β2激动剂吸入量,取得了满意的疗效且无明显的不良反应。     

Cysteinyl-leukotrienes in nasal lavage fluid in children with asthma

The aim of this study was to investigate repeatability of cysteinyl-leukotrienes (cys-LT) measurements in nasal lavage fluid (NLF) and to determine if cys-LT levels in NLF are related to asthma severity in children. As a second outcome, we investigated if cys-LT in NLF reflect lower airway inflammation as assessed by exhaled NO measurement. To assess the repeatability of cys-LT measurements, two NLF samples were obtained from eight healthy controls 24 h apart. Sixty-nine asthmatic children (mean age; range: 12.8; 7.3–17.7 yr), which were grouped according to asthma severity were studied cross-sectionally on one occasion. Cys-LT in NLF were analyzed using a specific enzyme immunoassay, exhaled NO, and pulmonary function parameters were measured. The coefficient of repeatability for the repeated cys-LT measurements was 1.45 pg/ml. Cys-LT levels in NLF differed significantly between asthma severity groups (p < 0.001): mild intermittent: [median (IQR)] 6.88 pg/ml (2.00–27.87); mild persistent: 21.09 pg/ml (4.50–84.67); and moderate persistent asthmatics: 36.41 pg/ml (11.03–118.40). Concentration of cys-LT in NLF and exhaled NO was positively correlated (r = 0.85; p < 0.001). In conclusion, concentration of cys-LT in NLF correlates with asthma severity in children and is related to lower airway inflammation.     

Influence of budesonide on the response to inhaled terbutaline in children with mild asthma

The aim of this study was to evaluate if continuous treatment with budesonide or salmeterol influences the bronchodilator response to terbutaline in children with asthma; 23 children, aged 7 to 16 years (mean = 11 years), with mild asthma were treated with inhaled budesonide 100 μg b.i.d. and placebo for three weeks in a randomized, double blind crossover study. These treatments were followed by treatment with inhaled salmeterol 50 μg b.i.d. for 3 weeks. On the last day of each period a cumulative dose-response experiment with terbutaline in the doses 50, 100, 250 and 500 μg (cumulative dose 900 μg) was performed. Lung function was measured before and 20 min after each terbutaline inhalation. Baseline pulmonary functions after budesonide treatment were significantly higher than the baseline measured after the two other treatments (p < 0.05). After budesonide treatment, the dose-response curve was shifted vertically upwards but otherwise parallel to the dose-response curve after placebo. The increase from baseline after the first cumulative dose of terbutaline was significantly lower after salmeterol treatment than after the two other treatments (p < 0.01). Maximal lung functions after 900 μg terbutaline also differed significantly between the three dose-response days; budesonide being significantly higher and salmeterol significantly lower than placebo (p = 0.02 and p < 0.001, respectively). It is concluded that budesonide treatment does not enhance the brochodilator response to terbutaline. Further studies are needed to assess if long-term continuous salmeterol treatment reduces the response to terbutaline.     

Montelukast in pediatric asthma management

Leukotriene modifiers (receptor antagonist and biosynthesis inhibitor) represent the first mediator specific therapeutic option for asthma. Montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist is the only such agent approved for use in pediatric patients. Montelukast modifies action of leukotrienes, which are the most potent bronchoconstrictors, by blocking Cysteinyl leukotriene receptors. Systemic drug like mountelukast can reach lower airways and improves the peripheral functions which play a crucial role in the evolution of asthma. Review of existing literature showed that montelukast compared to placebo has proven clinical efficacy in better control of day time asthma symptoms, percentage of symptom free days, need for rescue drugs and improvement in FEV₁. Studies also demonstrated improvement in airway inflammation as indicated by reduction in fractional exhaled nitric oxide, a marker of inflammation. Studies comparing low dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) with montelukast are limited in children and conclude that it is not superior to ICS. For moderate to severe persistent asthma, montelukast has been compared with long acting beta agonists (LABA) as an add-on therapy to ICS, montelukast was less efficacious and less cost-effective. It has beneficial effects in exercise induced asthma and aspirin-sensitive asthma. Montelukast has onset of action within one hour. Patient satisfaction and compliance was better with montelukast than inhaled anti-inflammatory agents due to oral, once a day administration. The recommended doses of montelukast in asthma arechildren 1–5 years: 4 mg chewable tablet, children 6–14 years: 5mg chewable tablet, adults: 10 mg tablet; administered once daily. The drug is well tolerated. Based on the presently available data montelukast may be an alternative treatment for mild persistent asthma as monotherapy where ICS cannot be administered. It is also an alternative to LABA as an add-on therapy to ICS for moderate to severe persistent asthma. The other indications for use of montelukast include: allergic rhinitis, exercise induced bronchoconstriction and aspirin-induced asthma.     

Inhaled budesonide reduces lung hyperinflation in children with asthma

Previous studies have shown that asthmatics have hyperinflation as defined by larger total lung capacity. The present study was set up in order to document changes in asthma clinic, airway calibre, airway reactivity and lung volumes after budesonide treatment. After a 2-week run-in period, 28 children with moderate persistent asthma were treated in a double-blind manner either with budesonide (0. 4 mg/day) or placebo for 8 weeks and, thereafter, all patients were treated with open-label budesonide for a further 20 weeks. Symptoms, bronchodilator requirements and airway calibre improved significantly after 8 weeks of treatment ( p < 0. 05 for each) and prolonged treatment did not cause any further improvement. Reduction in hyperreactivity was apparent only after 20–28 weeks of treatment. Total lung capacity decreased along with budesonide treatment in both groups suggesting that early introduction of an inhaled corticosteroid may be useful in the prevention of asthma-related remodelling of the lung and thoracic cage.     

Management of pediatric asthma

Bronchial asthma, in adults and children, is a major health problem, with prevalence rates ranging from 4% to 7% in western Europe. Observational studies suggest that in Italy, like in the other countries, asthma is poorly controlled: most patients report frequent symptoms and limitation to daily activities; the utilization of healthcare resources (hospitalization, emergency room visits, unscheduled urgent care visit) is high. Recent international guidelines (GINA) for asthma management, together with an up-date by NIH, point to the primary role of inhaled corticosteroids for the control of the disease. Early interention with anti-inflammatory drugs is important, also in pre-school children with frequent or persistent symptoms, in order to prevent irreversible structural alterations of the airways and to improve long-term prognosis. In the presence of more severe asthma, inhaled corticosteroids can be associated with long-acting beta2-agonists bronchodilators. These 2 drug classes target different and complementary aspects of the pathophysiology of asthma (inflammation and bronchial obstruction) in a synergistic manner, i.e. by mutual potentiation of their pharmacological activity. Thus, combination therapy may optimize beneficial actions, allowing a more effective control of asthma.     

Intermittent treatment with inhaled steroids for deterioration of asthma due to upper respiratory tract infections

Upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) is a common cause of deterioration of asthma in children. We investigated if inhaled steroids (budesonide), started early after URTI, could reduce asthma. Thirty-one children, 3-10 years of age, with deterioration during URTI participated. The study design was double-blind, crossover and placebo-controlled. Peak-expiratory flow (PEF) and symptom scores were recorded. Four treatment periods of 9 days, two with budesonide and two with placebo, were planned. Treatment was started at the first sign of URTI. Budesonide/placebo was given by Turbuhaler at 0.2 mg qid for 3 days, tid for 3 and bid for the last 3 days. Twenty-two children completed 67 periods. Eleven visited the emergency room, only three during budesonide therapy. Five received oral steroids and two where admitted to hospital, all receiving placebo. Symptom scores were not significantly lower during budesonide treatment. PEF, both morning and evening, was significantly higher during budesonide than placebo (p = 0.015 and p = 0.022). Inhaled budesonide can attenuate exacerbation of URTI-induced asthma. Asthma, budesonide, infection, inhaled steroids, intermittent, prophylactic
J Svedmyr, Department of Paediatrics, Falu Hospital, S-791 82 Falun, Sweden     

Clinical effects of a Long-term Educational Program for Children with Asthma – Aironet®. A 1-yr randomized controlled trial

Educational self-management programs for children with asthma have now become a routine feature in the management of the disease, as international guidelines underline. We designed this trial to find out whether Aironet^®, an educational program developed for children with asthma, influenced asthma severity and improved parents' knowledge of the disease. In a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial we enrolled 123 children, 72 boys, mean age 8.78 yr (±2.33 s.d.), with intermittent or mild persistent asthma. Participants were randomly assigned to an education group, who received Aironet^® at baseline and 2 months later (60 children), or to a control group who did not (63 children). Follow-up lasted 12 months and included out-patient clinic visits and spirometry at 2, 4 and 12 months. At baseline and at 12 months follow-up, parents were questioned about their knowledge of asthma, and their children's asthmatic attacks, use of systemic corticosteroids, family physician or hospital emergency room visits, hospitalizations and asthma-related school absences. Questionnaire replies at 12-month follow-up reported significantly fewer asthma attacks in patients who received the program than in those who did not (1.65 ± 1.21 vs. 2.34 ± 1.73; p < 0.05). For the subgroup of children who had ≥3 asthma attacks at baseline, parents' knowledge improved significantly more in the educational group than in the control group. The out-patient educational program Aironet^® reduces the number of asthma attacks in children with intermittent or mild persistent asthma and improves knowledge of the disease.     

Nitrites in induced sputum as a simple and cheap non-invasive marker of airway inflammation for asthmatic schoolchildren

To determine if there are differences in the nitric oxide metabolites (nitrites) in sputum of patients with persistent asthma and healthy schoolchildren, we performed a case-control study in a tertiary care hospital in Arequipa, Perú. Nitrites in induced sputum samples were measured using the Griess assay in 30 persistent asthmatics (mean age of 10.1 yr) and 30 controls (mean age of 11.9 yr). The mean ± s.d. of nitrites among asthmatics was significantly higher than the controls (16.30 ± 8.6 vs. 10.25 ± 4.68 nmol/ml, respectively, p = 0.001). Moreover, the nitrite level in the sputum in children with severe persistent asthma was higher than in the level found in the moderate and mild asthmatics (32.83 ± 9.48 vs. 18.10 ± 1.96 vs. 11.84 ± 4.73 nmol/ml, respectively, p < 0.01 for linear trend). This study showed for the first time in children that asthmatics have significantly higher levels of nitrites in induced sputum than healthy controls and that the level of nitrite correlates with the severity of the asthma. Nitrite levels in sputum, a simple and cheap, non-invasive method, may be a good alternative to measure the severity of inflammation in asthmatic children.     

Advances in the management of asthma

Exciting new data are increasing the evidence base for the management of paediatric asthma. To inform the treatment of preschool wheeze, the best current classification is into episodic (viral) and multitrigger wheeze, rather than according to epidemiological pattern (transient versus persistent) and the presence or absence of atopy. Episodic (viral) wheeze is treated intermittently, with either inhaled bronchodilators or oral montelukast at the time of viral colds. If this approach fails, intermittent high-dose inhaled corticosteroids may be tried. Oral prednisolone is ineffective in the treatment of all but the severest attacks of preschool episodic (viral) wheeze, and is not a primary-care medication in this context. In older children the role of long-acting β₂ agonists has been explored. They are not indicated as first-line prophylactic therapy. In children with more severe symptoms, a single-inhaler strategy using budesonide/formoterol should be considered. In children who do not respond to conventional asthma therapy, the diagnosis and the way in which the prescribed treatment is being used should be reviewed rather than more treatment being blindly given. Most cases will improve with conventional management which is properly undertaken, and will not require novel therapies.