Incidence of venous thromboembolism in asymptomatic family members who are carriers of factor V Leiden: a prospective cohort study

In a prospective cohort study, we assessed the incidence of spontaneous and risk period-related venous thromboembolism (VTE) in asymptomatic family members of patients who experienced VTE and had the factor V Leiden mutation. In all, 561 family members of 131 probands were included, 313 of whom were carriers (299 heterozygous and 14 homozygous) and 248 of whom were noncarriers of the factor V Leiden mutation. Average follow-up was 4 years (range, 4 months-6 years). There were 1255 and 984 observation-years of follow-up in carriers and noncarriers, respectively. Eight episodes of VTE occurred in heterozygous carriers, resulting in an annual incidence of 0.67% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29-1.33). Two events occurred in the absence of associated risk factors, determining an annual incidence of spontaneous VTE of 0.17% (95% CI, 0.02-0.6). Only one VTE (risk period-related) occurred in noncarriers, with an annual incidence of 0.1% (95% CI, 0.003-0.56). Relative risk for VTE in heterozygous carriers compared with noncarriers of the factor V Leiden mutation was 6.6 (95% CI, 1.1-39.8). Risk period-related VTE occurred with an incidence of 18% and 5% per risk period in heterozygous carriers and in noncarriers, respectively. Thus, the low rate of VTE in asymptomatic family members carrying the mutation did not justify continuous anticoagulant prophylaxis. Screening families of symptomatic probands with the factor V Leiden mutation has the potential to identify those asymptomatic carriers who might benefit from thromboprophylaxis during risk periods.     

FV Leiden mutation and risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in Serbian population

The absolute rate of recurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is approximately 5% per year. There is a lower rate of recurrence in provoked VTE, and higher in idiopathic one. So far, there is no consensus whether hereditary thrombophilia should be considered as a persistent risk factor, and whether it requires long-term anticoagulant therapy. The aim of our study was to estimate the risk of recurrent VTE in patients carrying FV Leiden mutation in Serbian population.In retrospective study (1994-2006), we have evaluated the risk of recurrent VTE in 56 patients who are carriers of FV Leiden mutation, in comparison to group consisting of 56 patients non-carriers of FV Leiden mutation. Patients with FII G20210A and MTHFR C677T mutations, antiphospholipid antibodies, antithrombin III, protein C or protein S deficiency, malignancies and diabetes were excluded from the study.Recurrent VTE occurred in 44.6% of the patients, carriers of the FV Leiden mutations, vs. 26.7% in non-carriers group (P<0.05). The incidence rate was 3.7 and 2.2% per year, respectively. The estimated relative risk of recurrence for FV Leiden carriers was 1.67 (95% CI 0.99-2.81, P=0.049). The 60% of patients with mutation and only 13% without mutation develop rethrombosis during first year after discontinuance of therapy (P<0.01).In our study patients with symptomatic VTE who are carriers of the FV Leiden gene mutations have a higher risk of recurrent VTE than non-carriers. Our data suggest the importance of the FV Leiden mutation detection and the estimation of the clinical condition for successful secondary prophylaxis of VTE.     

Risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with common thrombophilia: a systematic review

The 2 most common genetic polymorphisms that predispose to a first episode of venous thromboembolism (VTE) are factor V Leiden (FVL) and prothrombin G20210A. However, the effect of these polymorphisms on the risk of recurrent VTE is unclear. We performed a meta-analysis to obtain best estimates of the relative risk of recurrent VTE associated with these genetic polymorphisms. Electronic and manual searches were used to identify cohort studies of patients with a first episode of VTE that reported the incidence of objectively confirmed recurrence following discontinuation of anticoagulation among those with or without heterozygous FVL or prothrombin G20210A polymorphism. Thirteen reports fulfilled our criteria for inclusion. Pooled results from 10 studies involving 3104 patients with first-ever VTE revealed that FVL was present in 21.4% of patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 20%-23%) and associated with an increased odds of recurrent VTE of 1.41 (95% CI, 1.14-1.75; P = .08 for heterogeneity). Pooled results from 9 studies involving 2903 patients with first-ever VTE revealed that prothrombin G20210A was present in 9.7% of patients (95% CI, 9%-11%) and associated with an increased odds of recurrent VTE of 1.72 (95% CI, 1.27-2.31; P = .19). The estimated population-attributable risk of recurrence for FVL was 9.0% (95% CI, 4.5%-13.2%) and for prothrombin G20210A was 6.7% (95% CI, 3.4%-9.9%). Heterozygous FVL and prothrombin G20210A are each associated with a significantly increased risk of recurrent VTE after a first event, but the magnitude of the increase in risk is modest and by itself is unlikely to merit extended-duration anticoagulation. These data call into question the cost-effectiveness of routine testing for these common inherited thrombophilic polymorphisms among patients with a first episode of VTE.     

A prospective study of venous thromboembolism in relation to factor V Leiden and related factors

The aim of this study was to examine the occurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in relation to factor V-related risk factors. Using a nested case-control design combining 2 population-based prospective studies, we measured factor V Leiden, HR2 haplotype, activated protein C (APC) resistance, and plasma factor V antigen in 335 participants who developed VTE during 8 years of follow-up and 688 controls. The overall odds ratio (OR) of VTE was 3.67 (95% CI, 2.20-6.12) in participants carrying factor V Leiden compared with noncarriers. APC resistance measured after predilution with factor V-deficient plasma conferred an OR of 2.58 (95% CI, 1.62-4.10). All 3 participants homozygous for the HR2 haplotype had a VTE, and the OR of VTE for homozygosity was estimated to be 5.5 (95% CI, 2.45-12.5). Carriers of the HR2 haplotype otherwise were not at increased risk of VTE overall (OR = 1.05; 95% CI, 0.64-1.72), but double heterozygotes for HR2 and factor V Leiden carried an OR of idiopathic VTE of 16.3 (95% CI, 1.7-159) compared with noncarriers. Factor V antigen also was not associated with VTE overall, but for participants with the combination of high factor V antigen plus factor V Leiden the OR of idiopathic VTE was 11.5 (95% CI, 4.2-31.4). In the general population, APC resistance and factor V Leiden were important VTE risk factors; homozygosity for the HR2 haplotype may be a risk factor but was rare; otherwise, HR2 haplotype and factor V antigen were not risk factors except in carriers of factor V Leiden.     

The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a chronic rather than acute disease. After withdrawal of secondary thromboprophylaxis, many patients will experience a subsequent episode of thrombosis. Of these patients, approximately 5% will die from pulmonary embolism. The risk of recurrent VTE depends on the number of risk factors and their severity. High-risk patients, i.e. those with a natural coagulation inhibitor deficiency, recurrent thrombosis, active cancer, the lupus anticoagulant or compound clotting defects most probably benefit from indefinite oral anticoagulation. In these patients the risk of bleeding due to anticoagulant treatment seems to be outweighed by the risk of VTE. Patients with hyperhomocysteinemia or high factor (F) VIII plasma levels are also at an increased risk of recurrence. The optimal duration of secondary thromboprophylaxis in these patients is currently under investigation. Patients with the heterozygous F V Leiden mutation or the G20210A mutation in the F II gene do not require extended anticoagulation since their risk of recurrence is similar as in patients without the aforementioned mutations. Patients with VTE secondary to surgery or trauma have a relatively low risk of recurrence. In these patients short-term secondary thromboprophylaxis (6 to 12 weeks) is justified whereas patients with a first episode of spontaneous VTE should be treated with oral anticoagulants for a longer period of time (3 to 6 months).     

High incidence of venous thromboembolism recurrence in patients with sickle cell disease

Previous reports show increased incidence of venous thromboembolism [VTE, deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolus (PE)] in sickle cell disease (SCD) patients. The incidence, time course, and risk factors for VTE recurrence have been less well described. We determined the cumulative incidence of first VTE recurrence and bleeding in a cohort of SCD patients with incident VTE. Risk factors for recurrence and bleeding were also determined using multivariable Cox regression models, adjusting for gender, race/ethnicity, era of incident VTE, location and hospitalization-associated status of incident VTE, and SCD-related complications. Results are presented as adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Among 877 SCD patients with an incident VTE, the 1-year and 5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence was 13.2% (95% CI 11.0%-15.5%) and 24.1% (95% CI 21.2%-27.1%). Risk factors for VTE recurrence included more severe SCD (HR = 2.41; CI: 1.67-3.47), lower extremity DVT as the incident event (HR = 1.64; CI: 1.17-2.30), and pneumonia/acute chest syndrome (HR = 1.68; CI: 1.15-2.45). The cumulative incidence of bleeding was 4.9% (CI 3.5%-6.4%) at 6 months and 7.9% (CI: 6.2%-9.8%) at 1 year. More severe SCD (HR = 1.61; CI: 1.11-2.35) was associated with bleeding. The high incidence of VTE recurrence in patients with SCD suggests that extended anticoagulation may be indicated; however, this must be weighed against a relatively high risk of bleeding. Prospective, randomized studies of anticoagulation in SCD patients with VTE are needed.     

Antiphospholipid antibodies and venous thromboembolism

The clinical relevance of antiphospholipid antibodies (APLA) in patients without systemic lupus erythematosus who have venous thromboembolism (VTE) in unknown. Limited evidence suggests that there is an association between the presence of APLA and both initial and recurrent episodes of VTE and that patients with APLA and VTE are resistant to warfarin therapy. Unselected patients with a first episode of clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism were evaluated with objective tests for VTE and with laboratory tests for APLA; the latter included tests for the lupus anticoagulant (LA) and anticardiolipin antibodies (ACLA). Patients with VTE were treated with anticoagulant therapy and observed during and after discontinuation of anticoagulants for symptomatic recurrence of VTE. There was a strong association between LA and VTE (odds ratio, 9.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1 to 46.2) and 9 to 65 (14%; 95% CI, 7% to 25%) patients with VTE had LA. There was no association between the presence of ACLA and VTE (odds ratio, 0.7; 95%CI, 0.3 to 1.7) because of the high frequency of positive ACLA assays in patients without VTE. None of the 16 patients with VTE and APLA developed recurrent VTE while receiving warfarin therapy. There was no difference in rates of recurrent VTE in patients with or without APLA after anticoagulant therapy was discontinued. The strong association between LA and VTE suggests that testing for LA in patients with VTE is useful. The measurement of ACLA in patients with VTE has no clinical usefulness because the results are abnormal in a high proportion of patients without VTE. Although the presence of APLA in patients with VTE was not associated with resistance to a conventional intensity of warfarin or an increased risk of recurrent VTE after discontinuation of warfarin, a larger study should address these issues in a subgroup of patients with VTE and LA.     

Symptomatic pulmonary embolism and the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND: In patients with a first symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE), the risk of recurrence is unknown. We therefore investigated the risk of recurrence among patients with spontaneous symptomatic PE and among those with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) without symptoms of PE. METHODS: After discontinuation of secondary thromboprophylaxis for a first venous thromboembolism (VTE), we prospectively observed 436 patients for an average of 30 months. Patients with secondary VTE, natural inhibitor deficiencies, lupus anticoagulant, cancer, long-term antithrombotic therapy, vena cava filters, or pregnancy were excluded. The study outcome was objectively documented recurrent symptomatic VTE. RESULTS: Recurrent VTE was seen among 28 (17.3%) of 162 patients with symptomatic PE and among 26 (9.5%) of 274 patients with DVT without symptoms of PE. Compared with patients with DVT, the relative risk of recurrent VTE among patients with symptomatic PE was 2.2 (95% confidence interval, 1.3-3.7; P =.005). The relative risk was not affected by age, sex, presence of factor V Leiden or prothrombin G20210A, hyperhomocysteinemia, or high factor VIII levels. Compared with patients with DVT without symptoms of PE, patients with symptomatic PE had an adjusted relative risk of PE at recurrence of 4.0 (95% confidence interval, 1.3-12.3; P =.03). CONCLUSION: Patients with a first symptomatic PE not only have a higher risk of recurrent VTE than those with DVT without symptoms of PE, but are also at high risk of symptomatic PE at recurrence.     

Anemia and bleeding in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy for venous thromboembolism

In patients receiving anticoagulant therapy for venous thromboembolism (VTE), the important issue of anemia influence on the risk of bleeding has not been consistently studied. We used the large registry data RIETE (Registro Informatizado Enfermedad Tromboembólica) to compare the rate of major bleeding in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy for VTE according to the presence or absence of anemia at baseline. Patients with or without cancer were separately studied. Until August 2016, 63492 patients had been enrolled. Of these, 21652 (34%) had anemia and 14312 (23%) had cancer. Anemia was found in 57% of the patients with cancer and in 28% without (odds ratio 3.46; 95% CI 3.33–3.60). During the course of anticoagulant therapy, 680 patients with cancer had a major bleeding event (gastrointestinal tract 43%, intracranial 14%, hematoma 12%). Cancer patients with anemia had a higher rate of major bleeding (rate ratio [RR]: 2.52; 95% CI 2.14–2.97) and fatal bleeding (RR 2.73; 95% CI 1.95–3.86) than those without anemia. During the course of anticoagulation, 1133 patients without cancer had major bleeding (gastrointestinal tract 32%, hematoma 24%, intracranial 21%). Patients with anemia had a higher rate of major bleeding (RR 2.84; 95% CI 2.52–2.39) and fatal bleeding (RR 2.76; 95% CI 2.07–3.67) than those without. On a multivariable analysis, anemia independently predicted the risk for major bleeding in patients with and without cancer (hazard ratios: 1.66; 95% CI 1.40–1.96 and 1.95; 95% CI 1.72–2.20, respectively). During anticoagulation for VTE, both cancer- and non-cancer anemic patients had a higher risk for major bleeding than those without anemia. In anemic patients (with or without cancer), the rate of major bleeding during the course of anticoagulant therapy exceeded the rate of VTE recurrences. In patients without anemia the rate of major bleeding was lower than the rate of VTE recurrences.     

Oral anticoagulant therapy in venous thromboembolism

The main objective of treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the prevention of the extension, embolization, and recurrence of thrombosis. The long-term aim is to prevent late recurrences and the post-thrombotic syndrome. Heparin and oral anticoagulants (OACs) have been the cornerstones of VTE treatment in the last 30 years. Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) have been introduced more recently in the treatment of the acute phase of VTE, and they have allowed the home treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in selected cases. The optimal duration of OAC therapy after VTE is still controversial. Several studies have been conducted, and several are ongoing with the aim to stratify patients into risk categories for recurrence. Patients at high risk are candidates for long-term oral anticoagulation as the benefits of extended oral anticoagulation would outweigh the risk of bleeding. Patients are currently stratified into risk categories on the basis of clinical characteristics of the VTE event: (1) first or recurrent event; (2) idiopathic or due to a transient risk factor such as surgery, trauma, hormonal therapy, or immobilization; (3) presence of active cancer; (4) location (proximal DVT and/or pulmonary embolism, PE, or distal DVT); and (5) presence of known hereditary or acquired thrombophilia. Patients with distal VTE or VTE due to a transient risk factor are at a low risk of recurrence and short-term anticoagulation is indicated (3 months). Patients with an idiopathic event or with known thrombophilic defects such as FV Leiden or the G20210A prothrombin mutation are candidates for a longer course of therapy (6 months). Patients with cancer, antiphospholipid antibodies syndrome, recurrent idiopathic event, antithrombin deficiency, protein C or protein S deficiency, homozygosity for FV Leiden, and double heterozygosity are candidates for extended long-term anticoagulation. More recently, studies have indicated that other factors such as D-dimer levels after the discontinuation of OAC therapy or the residual vein thrombosis could be additional predictive factors for recurrences. In patients with VTE and cancer, oral anticoagulation poses a higher risk of bleeding, and such patients are more prone to recurrences. Alternative treatment with LMWH could be safer and more effective in these patients.     

The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism among heterozygous carriers of factor V Leiden or prothrombin G20210A mutation. A systematic review of prospective studies

Factor V Leiden (FVL) and prothrombin G20210A mutation (PTM) are the two most common genetic polymorphisms known to predispose to a first episode of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, whether these thrombophilic abnormalities are also risk factors for recurrent VTE is unclear. We conducted a systematic review of prospective studies to assess the risk of recurrent VTE associated with heterozygous carriage of each of these mutations. All randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies that reported the incidence of recurrent VTE in patients with and without FVL and PTM after discontinuation of anticoagulant treatment were collected and analyzed. The risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for recurrent VTE were calculated in heterozygous carriers of FVL or PTM and compared to those of non-carriers. Eleven studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Recurrent VTE occurred in 114 out of 557 heterozygous carriers of FVL (20.5%) as compared to 382 out of 2,646 non-carriers (14.4%); and in 38 out of 212 heterozygous carriers of PTM (17.9%) compared to 428 of 2,996 non-carriers (14.3%). The RR of VTE recurrence conferred by the heterozygous carriage of FVL and PTM was 1.39 (95% CI, range 1.15 to 1.67) and 1.20 (range 0.89 to 1.61), respectively, using the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effects model; 1.45 (1.13 to 1.85) and 1.36 (1.02 to 1.82), respectively, using the Der Simonian and Laird random effects method. In symptomatic patients with VTE, heterozygous carriage of FVL is clearly associated with a definitely increased risk of recurrent thromboembolism. The risk is lower with PTM and is difficult to interpret since it varies according to the assessment method used.     

Prothrombin 20210A mutation: a mild risk factor for venous thromboembolism but not for arterial thrombotic disease and pregnancy-related complications in a family study

BACKGROUND: The prothrombin 20210A mutation has been associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Its relationship with arterial disease and pregnancy-related complications is, however, still uncertain. The aim of this study was to estimate the incidences of first venous and arterial thrombotic events and pregnancy-related complications in relatives of patients with the mutation. METHODS: After clinical classification, the presence of the mutation was determined in first-degree relatives of consecutive patients with the mutation and a history of VTE or premature atherosclerosis. Relatives with and without the mutation were compared. RESULTS: Of all relatives, 204 (50%) were heterozygous, 5 were homozygous, and 198 had a normal genotype. The annual incidence of a first episode of VTE was 0.35% and 0.18% in carriers and noncarriers, respectively (odds ratio [OR], 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9-4.1); the annual incidence of a first arterial thrombosis was 0.22% and 0.15% in carriers and noncarriers, respectively (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 0.8-6.3). The annual incidence of a first myocardial infarction was 0.14% (95% CI, 0.05%-0.23%) and 0.05% (0.01%-0.14%) in carriers and noncarriers, respectively (OR, 4.7; 95% CI, 1.0-22.5; P =.06). In particular, homozygous carriers were at increased risk of VTE (OR, 6.0; 95% CI, 1.3-27.2), whereas a history of VTE in the proband influenced the risk of VTE in the relatives. Women with the mutation did not experience significantly more pregnancy-related complications than their relatives with a normal genotype. CONCLUSIONS: The prothrombin mutation is a mild risk factor for VTE within families of carriers but does not seem to play an important role in arterial thrombotic disease, with the exception of myocardial infarction, or in pregnancy-related complications.     

Thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor and the risk for recurrent venous thromboembolism

The impact of fibrinolysis for predicting the risk for recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) is low. We prospectively followed up 600 patients with a first VTE and evaluated the thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI) as a risk factor for recurrence. A high TAFI level (75th or higher percentile in thrombosis patients) was associated with a 2-fold higher risk for recurrence compared with lower levels. The probability of recurrence 2 years after anticoagulation was 14.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.6-20.4) among patients with high TAFI levels and 6.8% (95% CI, 4.3-9.3) among patients with lower levels (P =.006). Our data also support the concept of a linkage between fibrinolysis and the coagulation system. Patients with high TAFI levels had significantly higher levels of factors XI, VIII, and IX, and a high risk of recurrence was seen among patients with high TAFI levels and high levels of one of these factors. The relative risk (RR) for recurrence was highest among patients with high TAFI and high factor XI (RR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.3-6.9), high factor VIII (RR, 6.5; 95% CI, 2.9-14.8), or high factor IX (RR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.0-3.9) levels compared with patients with low levels of TAFI and one of these factors.     

Homozygosity in the single nucleotide polymorphism Ser128Arg in the E-selectin gene associated with recurrent venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND: The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) Ser128Arg in the E-selectin gene is overrepresented in certain patient populations with atherosclerosis or restenosis. As this SNP enhances tissue factor-triggered coagulation in humans during systemic inflammation, we hypothesized that it may also predispose for the development of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE). METHODS: A total of 585 patients were prospectively observed after first VTE for recurrent, objectively documented, symptomatic VTE. Patients with secondary VTE, homozygous factor V Leiden, natural inhibitor deficiencies, lupus anticoagulant, or long-term anticoagulation therapy were excluded. The S128R SNP was genotyped by mutagenically separated polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients (17%) were heterozygous, and 11 were homozygous (2%) for the Ser128Arg mutation. Ninety patients (15%) had recurrent VTE during follow-up. Homozygosity for the Ser128Arg SNP increased the cumulative likelihood, particularly for early recurrent VTE (log rank test, P<.05) and was an independent predictor of recurrent VTE (hazard ratio [HR], 4.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-11.4) in a multivariate Cox regression model. In contrast, heterozygosity for the polymorphism was associated with an unaltered HR (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.6-1.9) for recurrent VTE. CONCLUSIONS: Homozygosity for the S128R E-selectin allele appears to increase the risk for recurrent VTE several fold. If these findings are confirmed, this may represent a novel risk factor for recurrent VTE. These results also expand our knowledge on the association of this SNP with thrombotic disorders.     

Optimal duration of anticoagulation of venous thromboembolism

The optimal duration of anticoagulation after venous thromboembolism (VTE) is determined according to the risk of recurrent VTE after stopping anticoagulant therapy and the risk of anticoagulant-related bleeding while on antivitamin K. Clinical risk factors appears to be determinant to predict the risk of recurrence whereas the influence of biochemical and morphological tests is uncertain. The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism is low when the initial episode was provoked by a reversible major risk factor (surgery): 3 months of anticoagulation is optimal. Conversely, this risk is high when venous thromboembolism was unprovoked or associated with persistent risk factor (cancer): 6 months or more prolonged anticoagulation is warranted. After this first estimation, the duration of anticoagulation may be modulated according to the presence of additional minor risk factors (major thrombophilia, chronic pulmonary hypertension, massive pulmonary embolism): 6 months if VTE was provoked and 12 to 24 months if VTE was unprovoked. If the risk of anticoagulant related bleeding is high, the duration of anticoagulation should be shortened (3 months if VTE was provoked and 6 or 3 months if it was unprovoked). Lastly, if VTE occurred in the setting of a cancer, anticoagulation should be conducted for 6 months or more while cancer is active or on ongoing treatment. Despite an increasing knowledge of the risk factors of recurrent VTE, a number of issues remain unresolved; randomised trial comparing different duration of anticoagulation are needed.     

Inherited thrombophilic risk factors and venous thromboembolism: distinct role in peripheral deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether the FII A(20210) mutation is associated with isolated pulmonary embolism (PE). DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: Five thrombosis centers in southern Italy. PATIENTS: Six hundred forty-seven consecutive referred patients with objectively documented venous thrombosis and 1,329 control subjects. Measurements and results: Medical histories were collected. The G-to-A transition at nucleotide 1691 within the factor V gene (FV Leiden) and the G-to-A transition at nucleotide position 20210 within the prothrombin gene locus (FII A(20210)), levels of anticoagulant factors, and levels of antiphospholipid antibodies were determined by standard techniques. Patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT) of the lower extremities (n = 346) or with additional PEs (n = 175) showed similar prevalences of FV Leiden mutation (24.3% and 16.6%, respectively) and FII A(20210) mutation (14.2% and 12.6%, respectively), and similar deficiencies of natural anticoagulants (4.9% and 2.3%, respectively). In both groups, the frequencies of FV Leiden and/or FII A(20210) mutation were higher than those observed among 1,329 apparently healthy control subjects (4.8% and 4.4%, respectively; p < 0.0001). Among patients with isolated PE (n = 126), prevalences of FV Leiden (7.1%) and FII A(20210) mutation (8.7%) were similar to those of control subjects. Inherited thrombophilic abnormalities were less frequent among patients with PE only (15.6%) than among those with DVT only (37.0%; p < 0.001) or whose conditions were complicated by PE (28. 0%; p = 0.020). Adjusting for age and sex, FV Leiden mutation, FII A(20210) mutation, or both mutations were associated with DVT with PE (FV Leiden mutation: odds ratio [OR], 3.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6 to 5.5; FII A(20210) mutation: OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1. 3 to 5.2; and both mutations: OR, 82.1; 95% CI, 7.5 to 901.2) or without PE (FV Leiden mutation: OR, 6.1; 95% CI, 4.0 to 9.3; FII A(20210) mutation: OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.7 to 4.8; and both mutations: OR, 167.5; 95% CI, 21.6 to 1,297.7), but not with isolated PE (FV Leiden mutation: OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.5 to 2.8; FII A(20210) mutation: OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.5 to 3.1; and both mutations: OR, 22.1; 95% CI, 1. 3 to 370.2). CONCLUSIONS: FII A(20210) mutation is associated with DVT in the lower extremities alone or when complicated by PE, but it is not associated with isolated PE.     

Recurrent venous thromboembolism and bleeding complications during anticoagulant treatment in patients with cancer and venous thrombosis

A small proportion of patients with deep vein thrombosis develop recurrent venous thromboembolic complications or bleeding during anticoagulant treatment. These complications may occur more frequently if these patients have concomitant cancer. This prospective follow-up study sought to determine whether in thrombosis patients those with cancer have a higher risk for recurrent venous thromboembolism or bleeding during anticoagulant treatment than those without cancer. Of the 842 included patients, 181 had known cancer at entry. The 12-month cumulative incidence of recurrent thromboembolism in cancer patients was 20.7% (95% CI, 15.6%-25.8%) versus 6.8% (95% CI, 3.9%- 9.7%) in patients without cancer, for a hazard ratio of 3.2 (95% CI, 1.9-5.4) The 12-month cumulative incidence of major bleeding was 12.4% (95% CI, 6.5%-18.2%) in patients with cancer and 4.9% (95% CI, 2.5%-7.4%) in patients without cancer, for a hazard ratio of 2.2 (95% CI, 1.2-4.1). Recurrence and bleeding were both related to cancer severity and occurred predominantly during the first month of anticoagulant therapy but could not be explained by sub- or overanticoagulation. Cancer patients with venous thrombosis are more likely to develop recurrent thromboembolic complications and major bleeding during anticoagulant treatment than those without malignancy. These risks correlate with the extent of cancer. Possibilities for improvement using the current paradigms of anticoagulation seem limited and new treatment strategies should be developed.     

Low vitamin B6 levels and the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism

Low plasma vitamin B6, measured as pyridoxal-5'-phosphate (PLP), is associated with an increased risk of first venous thromboembolism (VTE). In a prospective cohort of 757 patients with first VTE we investigated the association of PLP levels with risk of recurrent VTE. After 4 years, the likelihood of VTE recurrence among patients with PLP < or =23.3 nmol/L and 14.4% (11.5%-17.4%) among those with PLP >23.3 nmol/L was 22.5% (95% CI 13.6%-31.5%) (p=0.01). Patients with PLP '23.3 nmol/L had 1.8-fold higher recurrence risk (1.01-3.14) than patients with PLP >23.3 nmol/L (adjusted for confounders including homocysteine). Therefore, low vitamin B6 is a risk factor of recurrent VTE.     

Factor V Leiden, prothrombin 20210A and the risk of venous thrombosis among cancer patients

Cancer patients have an increased risk of venous thrombosis (VT). The association of factor V Leiden (FVL) and the prothrombin 20210A variant with VT in cancer patients is not established. We genotyped 101 cancer patients with VT and 101 cancer patients without VT for these polymorphisms. Five cases and three controls were heterozygous for FVL, yielding an odds ratio of 1.7 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.3-10.7). Five cases and no controls were heterozygous for prothrombin 20210A, for an odds ratio of 6.7 (95% CI 0.9-infinity). Prothrombin 20210A may be associated with VT risk among cancer patients.     

High plasma levels of factor VIII and risk of recurrence of venous thromboembolism

The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between factor VIII (FVIII) levels, measured by chromogenic and clotting assays, and risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence. A total of 564 patients underwent clinical follow-up after oral anticoagulant withdrawal (total follow-up = 924.4 years). Recurrent VTE developed in 39 of 309 (12.6%) patients with a first idiopathic VTE and in 14 of 255 (5.5%) patients whose first event was secondary. In patients with a first idiopathic VTE, the risk of recurrence was more than fivefold higher in patients with FVIII levels exceeding the 90th percentile [chromogenic FVIII: relative risk (RR) 5.43 (95% CI 1.76-16.8); clotting FVIII: RR 6.21 (95% CI 1.57-24.5)] after adjustment for all possible confounding variables. In patients with a first secondary VTE, the risk of recurrence was slightly higher in patients with high FVIII levels [chromogenic FVIII: RR 2.62 (95% CI 0.34-19.9); clotting FVIII: RR 1.74 (95% CI 0.25-12.1)], but, given the low number of recurrences, the 95% CI were very large. In conclusion, this study shows that high FVIII levels are associated with increased risk of VTE recurrence in patients with a first idiopathic VTE. Although the measurement of FVIII levels by a specific chromogenic assay might, in principle, be preferred to avoid the risk of aspecific clotting effects, no significant differences in results obtained by chromogenic or clotting methods were found.