Splenectomy in Myelofibrosis: Indications,Efficacy, and Complications

Splenomegaly, which may range from a few centimeters below the left costal border to massive dimensions, is one of the most characteristic features in patients with advanced myelofibrosis (MF). Splenectomy may offer an effective therapeutic option for treating massive splenomegaly in patients with MF, and especially in cases of disease refractory to conventional drugs, but it is associated with a number of complications as well as substantial morbidity and mortality. Whether splenectomy should be performed before allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation is also controversial, and there is a lack of prospective randomized clinical trials that assess the role of splenectomy before hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in patients with MF. Although splenectomy is not routinely performed before transplantation, it may be appropriate in patients with massive splenomegaly and related symptoms, so long as the higher risk of graft failure in such cases is taken into account. This review aims to describe the efficacy, indications, and complications of splenectomy in patients with MF; and to evaluate the long-term impact of splenectomy on patient survival and risk of disease transformation.     

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: Identifying and Treating “Progression” in Myelofibrosis

Over the last decade, the Janus kinase (JAK) 1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib has become widely established as the cornerstone of pharmacologic therapy for most patients with myelofibrosis (MF), providing dramatic and durable benefits in terms of splenomegaly and symptoms, and prolonging survival. Ruxolitinib does not address all aspects of the disease, however; notably cytopenias, and its ability to modify the underlying biology of the disease remains in question. Furthermore, patients eventually lose response to ruxolitinib. Multiple groups have reported the median overall survival of MF patients after ruxolitinib discontinuation to be 13 to 14 months. While consensus criteria only recognize splenic and blast progression as “progressive disease” in patients with MF, disease progression can occur in a variety of ways. Besides increasing splenomegaly and progression to accelerated phase/leukemic transformation, patients may develop worsening disease-related symptoms, cytopenias, progressive leukocytosis, extramedullary hematopoiesis, etc. As in the frontline setting, treatment needs to be tailored to the clinical needs of the patient. Current treatment options for patients with MF who fail ruxolitinib remain unsatisfactory, and this continues to represent an area of major unmet medical need. The regulatory approval of fedratinib has introduced an important option in the postruxolitinib setting. Fortunately, a plethora of novel agents, both new JAK inhibitors and drugs from other classes, eg, bromodomain and extraterminal (BET), murine double minute 2 (MDM2) and telomerase inhibitors, activin receptor ligand traps, BH3-mimetics and more, are poised to greatly expand the therapeutic armamentarium for patients with MF if successful in pivotal trials.     

The Myelodepletive Phenotype in Myelofibrosis: Clinical Relevance and Therapeutic Implication

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a BCR-ABL1⁻ myeloproliferative neoplasm that arises from hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells frequently harboring a somatic driver mutation in 1 of 3 genes: JAK2, CALR, or MPL. The pathologic features of this hematologic malignancy include myeloproliferation, diffuse bone marrow fibrosis, and overactivation of the JAK-STAT pathway, resulting in enhanced inflammatory cytokine release. The common clinical manifestations of MF include systemic symptoms, abnormal peripheral blood count levels, and splenomegaly. However, it has become increasingly appreciated that significant clinical heterogeneity exists among patients with MF. Two distinct MF clinical phenotypes include the myeloproliferative and myelodepletive phenotype, with peripheral blood counts being the main discerning feature. Patients with the myeloproliferative phenotype will present with elevated peripheral blood counts and often experience significant constitutional symptoms and progressive splenomegaly. In contrast, patients with the myelodepletive phenotype will have low peripheral blood counts and will frequently require transfusion support. Current frontline therapies for MF, include ruxolitinib and fedratinib, which can exacerbate cytopenias and thereby pose an impediment to effective treatment of the myelodepletive patient. The present review discusses the clinical and prognostic implications of the myelodepletive phenotype and the therapeutic options and limitations for this subset of patients, representing an unmet clinical need.     

State-of-the-Art Review on Myelofibrosis Therapies

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a BCR-ABL1–negative myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by anemia, extramedullary hematopoiesis, bone marrow fibrosis, splenomegaly, constitutional symptoms and acute myeloid leukemia progression. Currently, allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) therapy is the only curative option for MF patients. However, AHSCT is strictly limited due to the high rates of morbidity and mortality. Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) inhibitor Ruxolitinib is the first-line treatment for intermediate-II or high-risk MF patients with splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms, but most MF patients develop resistance or intolerance to Ruxolitinib. Therefore, MF treatment is a challenge for the medical community. This review summarizes 3 investigated directions for MF therapy: monotherapies of JAK inhibitors, monotherapies of non-JAK targeted agents, combination therapies of Ruxolitinib and other agents. We emphasize combination of Ruxolitinib and other agents is a promising strategy.     

Thrombocytopenia in Patients With Myelofibrosis: Pathogenesis,Prevalence, Prognostic Impact,and Treatment

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a clonal hematopoietic stem cell neoplasm, characterized by pathologic myeloproliferation associated with inflammatory and pro-angiogenic cytokine release, that results in functional compromise of the bone marrow. Thrombocytopenia is a disease-related feature of MF, which portends a poor prognosis impacting overall survival (OS) and leukemia free survival. Thrombocytopenia in MF has multiple causes including ineffective hematopoiesis, splenic sequestration, and treatment-related effects. Presently, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the only curable treatment for MF, which, unfortunately, is only a viable option for a minority of patients. All other currently available therapies are either focused on improving cytopenias or the alleviating systemic symptoms and burdensome splenomegaly. While JAK2 inhibitors have moved to the forefront of MF therapy, available JAK inhibitors are advised against in patients with severe thrombocytopenia (platelets < 50 × 10⁹/L). In this review, we describe the pathogenesis, prevalence, and prognostic significance of thrombocytopenia in MF. We also explore the value and limitations of treatments directed at addressing cytopenias, splenomegaly and symptom burden, and those with potential disease modification. We conclude by proposing a treatment algorithm for patients with MF and severe thrombocytopenia.     

Ruxolitinib for Myelofibrosis–An Update of Its Clinical Effects

Myelofibrosis (MF), a Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm, is characterized by progressive bone marrow fibrosis and ineffective hematopoiesis. Clinical hallmarks include splenomegaly, anemia, and debilitating symptoms. In 2 randomized phase III studies, the Janus kinase (JAK) 1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib significantly improved splenomegaly and disease-related symptoms compared with placebo (Controlled Myelofibrosis Study with Oral JAK Inhibitor Treatment [COMFORT-I]) or best available therapy (COMFORT-II) in patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk MF. Although ruxolitinib therapy was associated with dose-dependent anemia and thrombocytopenia, these adverse events rarely led to treatment discontinuation. This update of the clinical effects of ruxolitinib in patients with MF was based on original articles and meeting abstracts published after the primary publication of the COMFORT trials in March 2012. Long-term follow-up data from the COMFORT trials and clinical experience with ruxolitinib in unselected patient populations suggest that improvement of splenomegaly and symptoms is durable. Patients benefit from ruxolitinib therapy across subgroups defined by age, MF type, risk category, performance status, JAK2 V617F mutation status, extent of splenomegaly, or presence of cytopenias. In COMFORT-I, platelet counts stabilized with dose adjustments, and hemoglobin levels gradually recovered to slightly below baseline after the first 8 to 12 weeks of therapy. After initial increases, the need for red blood cell transfusions decreased to a level similar to that found in the placebo group. The 2-year follow-up data from the COMFORT trials suggest that patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk MF receiving ruxolitinib therapy may have improved survival compared with those receiving no (placebo) or traditional therapy.     

New Drugs for the Treatment of Myelofibrosis

Managing patients with myelofibrosis (MF)—either those with primary MF or those whose MF has evolved from antecedent polycythemia vera or essential thrombocythemia—presents many challenges to the hematologist. Cure is potentially achievable through allogeneic stem cell transplantation, but this therapy is either inappropriate or not feasible for most patients. MF patients suffer from a range of debilitating disease manifestations (eg, massive splenomegaly, cytopenias, constitutional symptoms, and transformation to a treatment-refractory blast phase). Currently available therapies are palliative but can be of significant value to some MF patients for anemia, splenomegaly, or sometimes both manifestations. New medical therapies for MF revolve around three main themes: immunomodulation (to assist anemia), hypomethylation strategies, and (the most robust pipeline) the use of targeted JAK2 inhibitors. These latter agents have shown the ability to improve MF-associated splenomegaly and MF-associated symptoms but do not improve (and may exacerbate) anemia or thrombocytopenia. Future targeted agents, and perhaps combinations of agents that currently show complementary benefits, are anticipated to further enhance the efficacy of medical therapy for MF.     

Evaluating the serial use of the Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form for measuring symptomatic improvement: performance in 87 myelofibrosis patients on a JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor (INCB018424) clinical trial

BACKGROUND:

Symptomatic burden from constitutional symptoms, anemia, and splenomegaly‐related symptoms are common and morbidity inducing in patients with myelofibrosis (MF). The authors previously developed a MF‐specific instrument for capturing the burden of MF‐associated disease‐related symptoms, the Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form.

METHODS:

The authors evaluated the usefulness of serial administration of the Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form as an instrument for the assessment of symptomatic burden and improvement in conjunction with the therapeutic clinical trial of the open label phase 2 trial of the JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor INCB018424 in patients with MF.

RESULTS:

The analysis cohort of 87 patients treated in this trial demonstrated that the instrument was comprehensive and sensitive to symptoms present at trial enrollment. In addition, baseline Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form symptom scores correlated well with objective parameters such as splenomegaly and impaired performance status assessed by the 6‐minute walk test. Serial administration while on therapy with INCB018424 demonstrated the instrument to be sensitive to symptomatic change, and that improvements in symptoms correlated well with objective improvements in both weight loss and performance status (6‐minute walk test).

CONCLUSIONS:

The use of the Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form in this phase 2 trial helped characterize the symptomatic improvements observed with use of INCB018424 in MF patients. In an era of many targeted therapies undergoing testing for MF with potential symptomatic benefit, the Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form may provide a useful tool for objective symptomatic assessment and potentially allow some nonrandomized comparison between therapeutic agents. Cancer 2011;. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Ruxolitinib Rechallenge Can Improve Constitutional Symptoms and Splenomegaly in Patients With Myelofibrosis: A Case Series

Introduction

Myelofibrosis (MF) is one of the classic myeloproliferative neoplasms and can occur de novo or following transformation from polycythemia vera (PPV MF) or essential thrombocythemia (PET MF). It can be associated with constitutional symptoms and splenomegaly, both of which can negatively impact quality of life. The only curative option for MF is allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Studies have shown that JAK2 inhibitors such as ruxolitinib are effective in reducing both splenomegaly and symptom burden. Although there is no approved treatment for patients who progress on ruxolitinib, anecdotal evidence suggests patients may respond to a re-challenge of ruxolitinib after drug cessation.

Efficacy of splenectomy for patients with mantle cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

The purpose of this study was to define the role of splenectomy in patients (pts) with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) with regard to improving cytopenias and symptoms of splenomegaly. 26 pts with MCL underwent splenectomy between January 1987 and October 1999 and were followed prospectively for hematologic response and operative morbidity and mortality. A positive response was defined at 1 month of follow-up as: a hemoglobin of > or = 1.0 g/dl in a pt with a preoperative value < 11.0 g/dl; or a platelet count of > or = 100 x 10(9)/L in a pt with a preoperative value < 100 x 10(9)/L. A positive hematologic response was achieved in 69.2% of pts with preoperative anemia, 90% with thrombocytopenia, and 50% with both anemia and thrombocytopenia. The peri- and post-operative morbidity were 3.8 and 19.2%, respectively, the operative mortality was 0%. The median duration of hospitalization was six days. Four (15.4%) pts have not required chemotherapy after splenectomy. Three of these four were previously untreated and they have maintained stable disease for eight years after splenectomy without chemotherapy. Eight additional pts did not require chemotherapy for > 13 months after splenectomy. These results suggest that splenectomy may provide durable remission in selected pts with refractory cytopenias or symptoms related to splenomegaly in pts with MCL. There is a subset of pts that have prolonged disease stabilization without the requirement for immediate chemotherapy after splenectomy.     

Novel Therapies for Myelofibrosis

Purpose of Review

The purpose of the review was to provide a contemporary update of novel agents and targets under investigation in myelofibrosis in the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor era.

Recent Findings

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a clonal stem cell disease characterized by marrow fibrosis and a heterogeneous disease phenotype with a variable degree of splenomegaly, cytopenias, and constitutional symptoms that significantly impact quality of life and survival. Overactive JAK/STAT signaling is a hallmark of MF. The only approved therapy for MF, JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib, can ameliorate splenomegaly, improve symptoms, and prolong survival in some patients. Therapeutic challenges remain, however. Myelosuppression limits the use of ruxolitinib in some patients, eventual drug resistance is common, and the underlying malignant clone persists despite therapy. A deeper understanding of the pathogenesis of MF has informed the development of additional agents.

Summary

Promising targets under investigation include JAK1 and JAK2 and downstream intermediates in related signaling pathways, epigenetic modifiers, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and immune regulators.

     

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: Novel Therapeutic Strategies in Development for Myelofibrosis

Development of myelofibrosis (MF) therapeutics has reached fruition as the transformative impact of JAK2 inhibitors in the MPN landscape is complemented/expanded by a profusion of novel monotherapies and rational combinations in the frontline and second line settings. Agents in advanced clinical development span various mechanisms of action (eg, epigenetic or apoptotic regulation), may address urgent unmet clinical needs (cytopenias), increase the depth/duration of spleen and symptom responses elicited by ruxolitinib, improve other aspects of the disease besides splenomegaly/constitutional symptoms (eg, resistance to ruxolitinib, bone marrow fibrosis or disease course), provide personalized strategies, and extend overall survival (OS). Ruxolitinib had a dramatic impact on the quality of life and OS of MF patients. Recently, pacritinib received regulatory approval for severely thrombocytopenic MF patients. Momelotinib is advantageously poised among JAK inhibitors given its differentiated mode of action (suppression of hepcidin expression). Momelotinib demonstrated significant improvements in anemia measures, spleen responses, and MF-associated symptoms in MF patients with anemia; and will likely receive regulatory approval in 2023. An array of other novel agents combined with ruxolitinib, such as pelabresib, navitoclax, parsaclisib, or as monotherapies (navtemadlin) are evaluated in pivotal phase 3 trials. Imetelstat (telomerase inhibitor) is currently evaluated in the second line setting; OS was set as the primary endpoint, marking an unprecedented goal in MF trials, wherein SVR35 and TSS50 at 24 weeks have been typical endpoints heretofore. Transfusion independence may be considered another clinically meaningful endpoint in MF trials given its correlation with OS. Overall, therapeutics are at the cusp of an exponential expansion and advancements that will likely lead to the golden era in treatment of MF.     

Efficacy and tolerability of Janus kinase inhibitors in myelofibrosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Myelofibrosis is a myeloproliferative neoplasm associated with constitutional symptoms, increasing splenomegaly, and worsening cytopenias. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have been used for the treatment of myelofibrosis for several years, but there is a lack of comparative information between those treatments. A systematic review and network meta-analysis was performed on randomized controlled trials in patients with myelofibrosis receiving JAK inhibitor or placebo or control. Primary outcomes were efficacy on spleen volume reduction and total symptom score reduction. Additional analyses were conducted on anemia and thrombopenia events. Seven studies were included in the network meta-analysis including 1953 patients randomly assigned to four JAK inhibitors—ruxolitinib, fedratinib, pacritinib, momelotinib—or control. In first-line therapy, momelotinib and fedratinib were associated with comparable efficacy to ruxolitinib, and with less toxicity on erythrocytes and platelets, respectively. Pacritinib was less effective on splenomegaly than ruxolitinib as a first-line treatment but seemed effective in second line, after ruxolitinib exposure. Fedratinib and ruxolitinib that are FDA approved in myelofibrosis have both confirmed being valuable option to treat splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms, and their slightly different tolerance-profiles can guide therapeutic choice for first-line treatment, according to patient profile. Momelotinib could be another option especially due to its positive effect on anemia.Subject terms: Molecularly targeted therapy, Targeted therapies     

Hairy cell leukemia: clinical features and therapeutic advances

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a rare chronic lymphoproliferative disorder which has been extensively studied over the past decade. Much has been learned regarding the diagnosis, natural history, biology, and treatment of this unique neoplasm. The disease most commonly affects middle aged men and characteristic clinical features include splenomegaly, cytopenias, and usually the presence in the peripheral blood of distinctive thairy cells with irregular cytoplasmic projections. Diagnosis can usually be confirmed by bone marrow biopsy. Although the natural history can be extremely variable among patients, complications are usually referable to the cytopenias, with anemia and infection being most frequent. In addition to pyogenic infections, patients are susceptible to unusual organisms including atypical mycobacterium, legionella, and fungi. The requirement of red blood cell transfusion, severe granulocytopenia or thrombocytopenia, frequent infections, or painful splenomegaly are all indications for treatment. Splenectomy is the standard initial treatment of choice. However, in the past few years there have been exciting major advances in the therapeutic modalities for HCL. Recombinant alfa-interferon is highly effective, with beneficial responses occurring in close to 90% of patients. The Food and Drug Administration has recently approved the use the interferon for HCL. This represents the first time a biological response modifier has been approved for the treatment of human disease. In addition, preliminary results with the adenosine deaminase inhibitor, 2 deoxycoformycin (def), have been encouraging. Further clinical trials are required in order to determine the optimal sequential treatment strategy for HCL. The exact mechanisms of action of both interferon and def in HCL remain to be elucidated. A better understanding of the unusual features of the hairy cell and the underlying biological effect of these two agents in HCL may have important applications in other hamatologic and non-hematologic malignancies.     

Myelodysplastic syndrome: An update on diagnosis and therapy

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a diverse group of disorders characterized by disorderly and ineffective hematopoiesis. Patients suffer morbidity from associated cytopenias that result in an increased risk of infection, transfusion-dependent anemia, and bleeding. Despite the variable risk of transformation to acute leukemia, the majority of deaths are due to bone marrow failure. No truly effective treatment exists for MDS, and therapy usually focuses on reducing or preventing complications of the disease. Identification of potential cellular and molecular targets, such as epigenetic modification, has led to novel therapeutic approaches in recent years. An increasing number of diagnostic markers, prognostic parameters, and therapeutic strategies are available and becoming widely accepted.     

Myelodysplastic syndrome: An update on diagnosis and therapy

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a diverse group of disorders characterized by disorderly and ineffective hematopoiesis. Patients suffer morbidity from associated cytopenias that result in an increased risk of infection, transfusion-dependent anemia, and bleeding. Despite the variable risk of transformation to acute leukemia, the majority of deaths are due to bone marrow failure. No truly effective treatment exists for MDS, and therapy usually focuses on reducing or preventing complications of the disease. Identification of potential cellular and molecular targets, such as epigenetic modification, has led to novel therapeutic approaches in recent years. An increasing number of diagnostic markers, prognostic parameters, and therapeutic strategies are available and becoming widely accepted.     

Therapy with JAK 1/2 inhibitors for myelofibrosis

Purpose

Myelofibrosis (MF) is currently the myeloproliferative disorder with the most severe prognosis. A mutation of the JAK2 (V617F) enzyme is present in about 65?% of patients. Inhibition of JAK-kinases was therefore a proposed treatment for the disease. The purpose of this article is to give an updated overview about the recent developments in the therapy of MF with JAK-inhibitors.

Materials and methods

We did a research through the literature to identify the JAK 1/2 inhibitors which are already approved for treating MF or currently undergoing clinical trials. The most important clinical data concerning ruxolitinib, TG101348, SAR302503, CYT387, and SB1518 are described in more detail.

Results

Most of the relevant data documented clinical benefits of JAK inhibitors, particularly in terms of reducing splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms. However, there might also be a trend for better overall survival. The efficacy of ruxolitinib has been demonstrated in two large Phase III trials. In September 2012, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) approved ruxolitinib for the treatment of patients with intermediate or high-risk MF. The other drugs discussed here are still investigated in Phase II or III studies.

Conclusion

There is emerging evidence that supports the use of JAK-inhibitors for MF in clinical practice, especially for patients with splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms. Nevertheless, possible side effects such as anemia and thrombopenia must be considered when prescribing these substances.     

Treatment of lung cancer in the elderly. Part I: non-small cell lung cancer

There is a general trend worldwide of an increasing incidence of elderly population. Age is the greatest risk factor for cancer; therefore, this demographic shift is the main reason for an increase of cancer incidence. Lung cancer is a typical disease of the elderly patients. This review summarizes the issues of treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the elderly. Early stage NSCLC is usually treated with radical surgery, locally advanced NSCLC with radiotherapy (RT) and/or chemotherapy (CHT) and metastatic disease with CHT, but the evidence for these approaches is based on studies which are usually performed with highly selected patients while elderly patients are under-represented. We used the data from studies addressing particularly elderly or providing subgroup information on age to analyse the feasibility of current standard approaches for elderly and discuss alternative approaches. Surgery is an effective method in elderly patients with early stage NSCLC although some approaches bear a somewhat higher risk of operative morbidity and mortality. RT for early stage may be an alternative with curative potential. For locally advanced stage RT alone, or combined radiochemotherapy in selected cases, is feasible for elderly patients with locally advanced NSCLC when a careful assessment of pre-therapeutic status is made and appropriate drugs are selected. Advanced age alone also should not preclude CHT, although the risk of adverse effect may be higher in certain cases. New generation drugs seem to be particularly feasible and efficient in elderly patients. In general, age itself does not seem to preclude patients from standard treatments although in some cases co-morbidity forces to alternative approaches. Currently, single-agent CHT should be considered as the standard treatment of advanced NSCLC elderly patients.     

Laparoscopic splenectomy for non-Hodgkin lymphoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The spleen is frequently involved in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The indications for splenectomy in this disease include amelioration of symptoms from splenomegaly, correction of cytopenias, and the need to establish the diagnosis. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of laparoscopic splenectomy for patients with splenomegaly and NHL. METHODS: Retrospective review was made of patients who underwent laparoscopic splenectomy for suspected NHL. RESULTS: A total of 57 laparoscopic splenectomies have been performed in the lateral position; 9 of these patients had NHL. All patients had splenomegaly with a mean craniocaudal length of 17.8 cm and mean morcellated splenic weight of 765 gm. The mean operating-room time was 185 min, with a mean blood loss of 108 cc. None were converted to open splenectomy, and there was no mortality. The mean postoperative stay was 2-4 days. At a mean follow-up of 6.7 months, there have been no major complications or sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic splenectomy is indicated in the setting of splenomegaly and suspected lymphoma. The operation is best performed in the lateral position, which is successful in patients with massive splenomegaly.     

The New Landscape of Therapy for Myelofibrosis

The landscape of therapy for myelofibrosis (MF) is evolving at a pace not previously seen for this clonal myeloproliferative neoplasm. The discovery of the JAK2 V617F mutation in 2005 has led to the rapid development of therapy specifically developed for afflicted MF patients. Indeed, the successful phase III studies of ruxolitinib demonstrating improved symptomatic burden, splenomegaly and survival led to the first approved myelofibrosis drug in the United States and Europe. Multiple additional JAK2 inhibitors are currently in or nearing phase III testing, including SAR302503 (fedratinib), SB1518 (pacritinib) and CYT387 (momelotinib), seeking to offer incremental benefits to ruxolitinib in regards to cytopenias or other disease features. In parallel, phase III testing of pomalidomide is ongoing, with the goal of solidifying the role of immunomodulatory therapy in MF-associated anemia. Multiple single agents strategies are ongoing with histone deacetylase inhibitors, hedgehog inhibitors and hypomethylation agents. Incremental advances are further sought, either in additive or synergistic fashion, from combination strategies of ruxolitinib with multiple different approaches ranging from allogeneic stem cell transplant to current therapies mitigating anemia and further impacting the bone marrow microenvironment or histology. Transitioning from a pre-2011 era devoid of approved MF therapies to one of multiple agents that target not only disease course but symptomatic burden has indeed changed the platform from which MF providers are able to launch individualized treatment plans. In this article, we discuss the diagnostic and therapeutic milestones achieved through MF research and review the emerging pharmacologic agents on the treatment horizon.