利培酮和氟哌啶醇对精神分裂症白细胞介素的作用及其与疗效的关系

目的　探讨典型、非典型抗精神病药对精神分裂症白细胞介素 (IL)的影响及其与疗效之间的关系 ,以及免疫状态与精神症状的关系。方法　采用随机、双盲法应用固定剂量的利培酮和氟哌啶醇对 78例慢性精神分裂症进行 12周治疗 ,并在治疗前后评定PANSS量表。以 18例健康人为对照。同时在治疗前后测定血浆IL 2、IL -6和IL -8含量。结果①利培酮和氟哌啶醇治疗均降低精神分裂症过高的IL 2水平 ,两者之间无明显差异。②两种药物对患者过高的IL -6、IL 8水平均无明显影响。③治疗前IL 2、IL 8越低 ,则疗效越好。④治疗后IL 8水平与精神症状、主要是阳性症状有关。结论非典型和典型抗精神病药对精神分裂症免疫应答产生一定程度的抑制作用 ,两者之间无明显差异 ;患者治疗前的免疫水平与疗效之间存在一定的关系     

Increased serum interleukin-8 and interleukin-10 in schizophrenic patients resistant to treatment with neuroleptics and the stimulatory effects of clozapine on serum leukemia inhibitory factor receptor

There is now evidence that schizophrenia may be accompanied by an activation of the monocytic and T-helper-2 (Th-2) arms of cell-mediated immunity (CMI) and by various alterations in the Th-1 arm of CMI. There is also evidence that repeated administration of typical and atypical antipsychotics may result in negative immunomodulatory effects. This study was carried out to examine (1) the serum concentrations of interleukin-8 (IL-8), IL-10, the soluble CD8 (sCD8) and the leukemia inhibitory factor receptor (LIF-R) in nonresponders to treatment with typical neuroleptics as compared with normal volunteers and responders to treatment; and (2) the effects of atypical antipsychotics on the above immune variables. The latter were determined in 17 nonresponders to treatment with neuroleptics and in seven normal volunteers and 14 schizophrenic patients who had a good response to treatment with antipsychotic agents. The nonresponders had repeated measurements of the immune variables before, and 2 and 4 months after treatment with clozapine or risperidone. Serum IL-8 and IL-10 were significantly higher in schizophrenic patients than in normal controls. The serum concentrations of the sCD8 were significantly increased 2 months, but not 4 months, after starting treatment with atypical antipsychotics. Serum LIF-R concentrations were significantly increased 2 and 4 months after starting treatment with atypical antipsychotics. It is concluded that: (1) schizophrenia is characterized by an activation of both pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory aspects of cell-mediated immunity; (2) prolonged treatment with atypical antipsychotics may increase the anti-inflammatory capacity of the serum in schizophrenic patients by increasing serum LIF-R concentrations; and (3) short-term treatment with clozapine may induce signs of immune activation which disappear upon prolonged treatment.     

Factors influencing acute weight change in patients with schizophrenia treated with olanzapine, haloperidol, or risperidone

OBJECTIVE: Clinical factors predicting weight change in patients with schizophrenia and related disorders during acute treatment with the antipsychotic drugs olanzapine, risperidone, and haloperidol were sought through retrospective analyses. METHOD: Six-week body-weight data from 2 trials, study 1 comparing olanzapine and haloperidol (N = 1,369) and study 2 olanzapine and risperidone (N = 268), were analyzed. Effects of 8 clinically relevant covariates--therapy, clinical outcome (Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale), baseline body mass index (BBMI), increased appetite, age, gender, race, and dose--on weight were compared. RESULTS: In study 1, olanzapine (vs. haloperidol) therapy, better clinical outcome, lower BBMI, and nonwhite race significantly affected weight gain. Effects of increased appetite and male gender on weight gain were significant for olanzapine but not for haloperidol. In study 2, better clinical outcome, lower BBMI, and younger age significantly affected weight gain. Increased appetite was more frequent during olanzapine treatment than during haloperidol, but not significantly different from risperidone. Significant differences in effect on weight change were found between olanzapine and haloperidol but not between olanzapine and risperidone. No evidence was found that lower antipsychotic drug doses were associated with lower weight gain. CONCLUSION: This report identifies predictive factors of acute weight change in patients with schizophrenia. Similar factors across antipsychotic drugs in predicting greater weight gain included better clinical outcome, low BBMI, and nonwhite race. Factors differing between conventional (haloperidol) and atypical (olanzapine) agents included increased appetite and gender. Choice of atypical antipsychotic drug (olanzapine vs. risperidone) was of minor importance with regard to influence on acute weight gain.     

Effect of risperidone on serum cytokines

A variety of cytokines are dysregulated in schizophrenia, and some antipsychotic drugs effect cytokines. In order to examine the effect of risperidone on plasma cytokines, we measured the serum level of IL-1b, IL-2, IL-6, IL-12, and INF-g during acute states of illness, and after 4 weeks of treatment with risperidone in 19 schizophrenic patients. The patients' psychopathology was assessed by PANSS. Plasma IL-12 levels increased significantly after 4 weeks of treatment (p = .002). Plasma IL-b, IL-2, IL-6, and INF-g levels were not significantly different before and after treatment. There were no significant correlations between the changes in cytokine levels and the changes in PANSS scores. Increased IL-12 may contribute to activation of immune responses during treatment with risperidone. IL-12 may play an important role in immune responses related to neuropsychiatry.     

Reduced serum BDNF levels in patients with chronic schizophrenic disorder in relapse,who were treated with typical or atypical antipsychotics

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor signals and dopaminergic function in the brain are strongly associated, and research on BDNF in schizophrenia may enhance our insights on the pathophysiological mechanisms of this disease. In the present study we aimed to investigate the possible association between serum BDNF levels and schizophrenic relapses and the possible differential effects of treatment with typical and atypical antipsychotics on serum BDNF levels in the same group of patients. We measured serum BDNF levels in 47 patients with schizophrenia during a relapse and again 6 weeks after administration of antipsychotic treatment (14 on risperidone, 18 on haloperidol, 10 on olanzapine and five on amisulpride) and in 44 healthy volunteers. Patients with schizophrenia showed reduced serum BDNF levels in relation to healthy volunteers at study entry. No significant differences were revealed in BDNF serum levels after 6 weeks of antipsychotic treatment in the patients compared to their own levels at study entry. However, serum BDNF was significantly increased in the subgroup receiving olanzapine compared to the other antipsychotics. Our findings may indicate a differential effect of olanzapine on BDNF levels compared to haloperidol, risperidone, and amisulpride.     

Effects of olanzapine, risperidone and haloperidol on prepulse inhibition in schizophrenia patients: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial

Prepulse inhibition (PPI), whereby the startle eyeblink response is inhibited by a relatively weak non-startling stimulus preceding the powerful startle eliciting stimulus, is a measure of sensorimotor gating and has been shown to be deficient in schizophrenia patients. There is considerable interest in whether conventional and/or atypical antipsychotic medications can "normalize" PPI deficits in schizophrenia patients. 51 schizophrenia patients participated in a randomized, double-blind controlled trial on the effects of three commonly-prescribed antipsychotic medications (risperidone, olanzapine, or haloperidol) on PPI, startle habituation, and startle reactivity. Patients were tested at baseline, Week 4 and Week 8. Mixed model regression analyses revealed that olanzapine significantly improved PPI from Week 4 to Week 8, and that at Week 8 patients receiving olanzapine produced significantly greater PPI than those receiving risperidone, but not haloperidol. There were no effects of medication on startle habituation or startle reactivity. These results support the conclusion that olanzapine effectively increased PPI in schizophrenia patients, but that risperidone and haloperidol had no such effects. The results are discussed in terms of animal models, neural substrates, and treatment implications.     

Atypical antipsychotics suppress production of proinflammatory cytokines and up-regulate interleukin-10 in lipopolysaccharide-treated mice

There is considerable evidence that schizophrenia is associated with immune system dysregulation. For example, blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of proinflammatory cytokines are significantly increased in schizophrenic patients, and their normalization correlates with improvement in psychotic symptoms. In fact, typical and atypical antipsychotics are reported to modulate immune function in in vitro and in vivo studies. In the present study, we examined the anti-inflammatory effect of antipsychotics, clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone and haloperidol, on serum cytokine levels in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-treated mice. Atypical antipsychotics, such as clozapine, olanzapine and risperidone, but not haloperidol, suppressed tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interleukin (IL)-6, and up-regulated IL-10. Moreover, only clozapine, robustly increased the serum levels of IL-10. Clozapine reproduced its anti-inflammatory feature in polyinsinic–polycytidylic acid sodium salt (Poly[I:C])-induced inflammation. Thus, the anti-inflammatory effect of clozapine would adapt to inflammation induced by some varieties of antigens. Several receptor ligands, such as 8-OH-DPAT, ketanserin, prazosin and scopolamine, were also examined as to their anti-inflammatory effects on serum cytokine levels in LPS-treated mice. Ketanserin and prazosin, but not 8-OH-DPAT nor scopolamine, behaved similarly to atypical antipsychotics. However, the remarkable increase of serum IL-10 level observed in clozapine was not detected in ketanserin and prazosin. These results suggest the unique efficacy of atypical antipsychotics in the suppression of proinflammatory cytokines, and the increase of anti-inflammatory cytokine, IL-10.     

Clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, and haloperidol in the treatment of patients with chronic schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder

OBJECTIVE: The authors compared the efficacy and safety of three atypical antipsychotics (clozapine, olanzapine, and risperidone) with one another and with haloperidol in the treatment of patients with chronic schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. METHOD: In a double-blind trial, 157 inpatients with a history of suboptimal treatment response were randomly assigned to treatment with clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, or haloperidol for 14 weeks (an 8-week escalation and fixed-dose period followed by a 6-week variable-dose period). RESULTS: Clozapine, risperidone, and olanzapine (but not haloperidol) resulted in statistically significant improvements in total score on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. Improvements seen in total and negative symptom scores with clozapine and olanzapine were superior to haloperidol. The atypical drugs, particularly olanzapine and clozapine, were associated with weight gain. CONCLUSIONS: The effects of atypical antipsychotics in this population were statistically significant but clinically modest. The overall pattern of results suggests that clozapine and olanzapine have similar general antipsychotic efficacy and that risperidone may be somewhat less effective. Clozapine was the most effective treatment for negative symptoms. However, the differences among treatments were small.     

The ability of atypical antipsychotic drugs vs. haloperidol to protect PC12 cells against MPP+-induced apoptosis

The present study examined the effects of the atypical antipsychotic drugs clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine and risperidone, on N-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium ion-induced apoptosis and DNA damage in PC12 cells, and explored the molecular mechanisms underlying these effects. Haloperidol, a typical antipsychotic drug, was used for comparison. Exposure of PC12 cells to 50 micro m N-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium ion for 24 h resulted in a 35-45% loss of cells in culture. Pretreatment with the aforementioned atypical antipsychotic drugs significantly reduced the N-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium ion-induced cell loss, whereas haloperidol (10-100 micro m) did not have this protective effect. Hoechst 33258 staining revealed the apoptotic nuclear features of the N-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium ion-induced cell death, and showed that the atypical antipsychotic drugs, but not haloperidol, effectively prevented PC12 cells from this N-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium ion-induced apoptosis. DNA fragmentation assays further confirmed the N-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium ion-induced nuclear fragmentation. Pretreatment with the atypical antipsychotic drugs completely prevented this nuclear fragmentation, whereas haloperidol only partially prevented it. In vitro oligonucleotide assays indicated an activation of a specific glycosylase that recognizes and cleaves bases (at the 8-hydroxyl-2-deoxyguanine site) that were damaged by N-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium ion. Pretreatment with the atypical antipsychotic drugs more effectively attenuated this N-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium ion-induced activation than did haloperidol. Northern blot analyses showed that the atypical antipsychotic drugs, but not haloperidol, blocked the N-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium ion-induced substantial increase of copper/zinc superoxide dismutase mRNA in PC12 cells. Atypical antipsychotic drugs slightly up-regulated the expression of copper/zinc superoxide dismutase mRNA, whereas haloperidol strongly increased the expression of copper/zinc superoxide dismutase mRNA. These data may account for the different therapeutic effects and side-effect profiles of typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia.     

Long-term effects of risperidone versus haloperidol on verbal memory, attention, and symptomatology in schizophrenia.

There is evidence in the literature that cognitive functions in schizophrenia (SC) may be improved by atypical neuroleptics (NLPs) in contrast to typical medication, but there is still controversy regarding this apparent superiority of atypical drugs. In this study, we assessed the differential effects of risperidone and haloperidol on verbal memory, attention, and psychiatric symptoms in SC. The performance of 28 SC participants, randomly assigned to risperidone (2-6 mg/day) or haloperidol (2-40 mg/day), was compared with that of healthy controls. The California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT), the d2 Cancellation Test, and the Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale were administered at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months. Relative to controls, all SC participants showed markedly impaired verbal memory and processing speed at each assessment period. There was no differential effect between the two NLPs on CVLT and d2 performance. However, risperidone was more effective than haloperidol in reducing psychiatric symptoms. Improvement in symptom severity was not associated with improvement in neurocognitive performance on these specific tests. Neither conventional nor atypical neuroleptic medications improved neurocognitive functioning over a 12-month follow-up, suggesting that psychopathological improvement under risperidone is independent of cognitive function.     

Effects of changing from typical to atypical antipsychotic drugs on subjective sleep quality in patients with schizophrenia in a Japanese population

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of the atypical antipsychotic drugs risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, and perospirone on the subjective quality of sleep in patients with schizophrenia. METHOD: Subjects were 92 inpatients (mean age = 59.9 years) who had been receiving treatment with conventional antipsychotic drugs and who met the DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 4 atypical antipsychotic drugs (olanzapine, perospirone, quetiapine, and risperidone). Subjective sleep quality and psychopathology were assessed twice: at baseline and 8 weeks after switching. Data were collected from June 2001 to December 2001. Subjective sleep quality was assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and psychopathology was measured by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). RESULTS: Subjective sleep quality as assessed by the PSQI was significantly improved with administration of olanzapine, risperidone, or quetiapine, but not with perospirone, in comparison with conventional antipsychotic drugs. Multiple regression analysis revealed that the improvement of sleep quality with administration of atypical antipsychotic drugs was predicted by poor sleep quality at baseline. In addition, improvement of sleep quality was significantly correlated with improvement of negative symptoms as assessed by the PANSS. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrated that atypical antipsychotic drugs improved subjective quality of sleep in patients with schizophrenia compared with conventional antipsychotic drugs, suggesting that the marked potency of serotonin-2 receptor blockade in atypical antipsychotic drugs may be involved in the mechanism of this improvement. These improvements were correlated with improvement of negative symptoms.     

Neurocognitive effects of clozapine,olanzapine, risperidone,and haloperidol in patients with chronic schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder

OBJECTIVE: Newer antipsychotic drugs have shown promise in ameliorating neurocognitive deficits in patients with schizophrenia, but few studies have compared newer antipsychotic drugs with both clozapine and conventional agents, particularly in patients who have had suboptimal response to prior treatments. METHOD: The authors examined the effects of clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, and haloperidol on 16 measures of neurocognitive functioning in a double-blind, 14-week trial involving 101 patients. A global score was computed along with scores in four neurocognitive domains: memory, attention, motor function, and general executive and perceptual organization. RESULTS: Global neurocognitive function improved with olanzapine and risperidone treatment, and these improvements were superior to those seen with haloperidol. Patients treated with olanzapine exhibited improvement in the general and attention domains but not more than that observed with other treatments. Patients treated with risperidone exhibited improvement in memory that was superior to that of both clozapine and haloperidol. Clozapine yielded improvement in motor function but not more than in other groups. Average effect sizes for change were in the small to medium range. More than half of the patients treated with olanzapine and risperidone experienced "clinically significant" improvement (changes in score of at least one-half standard deviation relative to baseline). These findings did not appear to be mediated by changes in symptoms, side effects, or blood levels of medications. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a history of suboptimal response to conventional treatments may show cognitive benefits from newer antipsychotic drugs, and there may be differences between atypical antipsychotic drugs in their patterns of cognitive effects.     

One-year double-blind study of the neurocognitive efficacy of olanzapine, risperidone, and haloperidol in schizophrenia

Neurocognitive deficits in schizophrenia can reach 1 to 2 standard deviations below healthy controls. The comparative effect of typical and atypical antipsychotic medications on neurocognition is controversial, and based primarily on studies with small samples and large doses of typical comparator medications. The present study assessed neurocognitive efficacy. It was hypothesized that olanzapine treatment would improve neurocognitive deficits to a greater degree than either risperidone or haloperidol treatment. This was a double-blind, randomized, controlled, parallel study with neurocognition assessed at baseline, and 8, 24, and 52 weeks. Per protocol, the haloperidol arm was discontinued. Four hundred and fourteen inpatients or outpatients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder were treated with oral olanzapine (n = 159), risperidone (n = 158), or haloperidol (n = 97). Individual domains (executive function, learning and memory, processing speed, attention/vigilance, verbal working memory, verbal fluency, motor function, and visuospatial ability) were transformed into composite scores and compared between treatment groups. At the 52-week endpoint, neurocognition significantly improved in each group (p < 0.01 for olanzapine and risperidone, p = 0.04 for haloperidol), with no significant differences between groups. Olanzapine- and risperidone-treated patients significantly (p < 0.05) improved on domains of executive function, learning/memory, processing speed, attention/vigilance, verbal working memory, and motor functions. Additionally, risperidone-treated patients improved on domains of visuospatial memory. Haloperidol-treated patients improved only on domains of learning/memory. However, patients able to remain in treatment for the entire 52 weeks benefited more from olanzapine or risperidone treatment than haloperidol treatment.     

Effectiveness of antipsychotic treatments for schizophrenia: interim 6-month analysis from a prospective observational study (IC-SOHO) comparing olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and haloperidol

BACKGROUND: The Intercontinental Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes (IC-SOHO) study was designed to provide information regarding use and outcome of antipsychotic treatments in a large, diverse population in real practice settings. METHOD: Outpatients with schizophrenia (ICD-10 or DSM-IV) who initiated or changed to a new antipsychotic entered this 3-year, naturalistic, prospective observational study. Four monotherapy treatment groups were defined according to the antipsychotic prescribed at baseline, namely olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, and haloperidol. Efficacy was assessed using the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness rating scale (CGI-S), inclusive of subscales for positive, negative, depressive, and cognitive symptoms. Tolerability was assessed by adverse event questionnaires and weight measurements. Six-month findings are described. RESULTS: At baseline, 5833 participants were prescribed monotherapy and the mean severity of illness was moderate to marked (CGI-S). At 6 months, olanzapine resulted in significantly greater improvements in overall, positive, negative, depressive, and cognitive symptoms compared with quetiapine, risperidone or haloperidol (p <.001). Improvements in overall, negative, and cognitive symptoms were significantly higher for risperidone compared with haloperidol (p <.001), whereas improvements across all symptoms were comparable for quetiapine and haloperidol. Extra-pyramidal symptoms and tardive dyskinesia decreased compared with baseline in the olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone groups but increased in the haloperidol group (p <.001, likelihood of extrapyramidal symptoms with haloperidol compared with olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone). Sexual function adverse events were most prominent in the haloperidol and risperidone treatment groups. Weight change was significantly greater for olanzapine compared with the other antipsychotics (p <.001). CONCLUSION: Our results support the previously reported positive impact of atypical antipsychotics, particularly olanzapine, in patients with schizophrenia.     

Immunosuppressive effects of clozapine and haloperidol: enhanced production of the interleukin-1 receptor antagonist

In schizophrenic patients, multiple immune abnormalities have been reported, including increased production of proinflammatory cytokines. There is some evidence that antipsychotic drugs may have immunosuppressive effects. The aim of this study was to examine the in-vitro effects of different concentrations of antipsychotic agents on cytokine production by human whole blood. We examined the effects of clozapine and haloperidol, 10(-4), 10(-6) and 10(-8)M, on the unstimulated and stimulated (lipopolysaccharide+phytohemagglutinin) production of interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-10, interferon-gamma (IFNgamma), and the IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA). Clozapine, 10(-6) and 10(-8)M, and haloperidol, 10(-4), 10(-6), and 10(-8)M, significantly increased the unstimulated and stimulated production of IL-1RA. Clozapine 10(-6)M significantly increased the stimulated production of IFNgamma. Clozapine 10(-4)M significantly suppressed the unstimulated production of IL-6 and IL-1RA and the stimulated production of IL-6, IL-10, IFNgamma and IL-1RA. The results suggest that both clozapine and haloperidol, at concentrations within the therapeutic range, may exert immunosuppressive effects through an enhanced production of IL-1RA.     

Role of GABAergic antagonism in the neuroprotective effects of bilobalide

Many studies suggest that the 5-HT6 receptors are involved, along with other 5-HT receptors, in the pathophysiology and pharmacotherapy of schizophrenia. It is a putative therapeutic target of atypical antipsychotic drugs, notably clozapine, as well as some other psychotropic agents. Preferential potentiation of dopamine (DA) efflux in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and hippocampus (HIP) has been suggested to contribute to the ability of atypical antipsychotic drugs (APDs), e.g. clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine and ziprasidone, to improve cognitive function in schizophrenia. The present study demonstrated that SB-399885, a selective 5-HT6 receptor antagonist, at doses of 3 and 10 mg/kg, had no effect on cortical DA release in freely moving rats. However, both doses of SB-399885 slightly but significantly increased DA release in the HIP. Of particular interest, SB-399885, 3 mg/kg, significantly potentiated the ability of a typical antipsychotic drug haloperidol, a D2 receptor antagonist, at a dose of 0.1 mg/kg, to increase DA release in the HIP but not the mPFC. The atypical antipsychotic drug risperidone, a multireceptor antagonist, which lacks 5-HT6 receptor antagonist properties, at doses of 0.1, 0.3 and 1.0 mg/kg, produced a bell-shaped dose response effect on DA efflux in the mPFC and HIP. SB-399885 potentiated risperidone (1.0 mg/kg)-induced DA efflux in both regions. The increase in the HIP, but not the mPFC, DA efflux by 0.3 mg/kg risperidone was also potentiated by SB-399885, 3 mg/kg. These results suggest that the combined blockade of 5-HT6 and D2 receptors may contribute to the potentiation of haloperidol- and risperidone-induced DA efflux in the mPFC or HIP. The present data provides additional evidence in support of a possible therapeutic role for 5-HT6 receptor antagonism, as an addition on therapy, to enhance cognitive function in schizophrenia.     

Effects of typical and atypical antipsychotics on neuropeptide Y in rat brain tissue and microdialysates from ventral striatum

The main goal of this study was to investigate effects of typical (haloperidol) and atypical (risperidone) antipsychotic drugs on brain regional neuropeptide Y (NPY)-like immunoreactivity (-LI) tissue concentrations and on release of NPY-LI in freely moving rats. An additional aim was to explore the effect of d-amphetamine on NPY-LI release following pretreatment with typical and atypical antipsychotics. During a 4-week period, male Wistar rats were fed chow to which vehicle, risperidone (1.15 mg/100 g food or 2.3 mg/100 g food), or haloperidol (1.15 mg/100 g food) were added. In one series of experiments, the animals were sacrificed on day 30 with focused microwave irradiation, the brain regions dissected and extracted for radioimmunoassay of NPY-LI. In another experimental series, probes were inserted into the ventral striatum. The perfusates were collected at 60-min intervals; NPY-LI was determined by radioimmunoassay. Haloperidol significantly increased NPY-LI in hypothalamus and the occipital cortex. In contrast, haloperidol decreased tissue levels of NPY-LI in striatum. Moreover, haloperidol and risperidone also significantly decreased extracellular NPY-LI concentrations in the ventral striatum. d-amphetamine (1.5 mg/kg) significantly increased extracellular NPY-LI in the vehicle group. Both haloperidol and risperidone pretreatments abolished the effect of d-amphetamine. The results show that d-amphetamine as well as haloperidol and risperidone selectively and specifically affect NPY-LI concentrations in brain tissue and microdialysates and that the effect of d-amphetamine is abolished by both typical and atypical antipsychotics.     

Developments in antipsychotic therapy with regard to hypotheses for schizophrenia

The typical antipsychotic drugs like chlorpromazine and haloperidol were discovered by serendipity in the 1950s. A number of so-called "me too" drugs with similar chemical structures and modes of action were marketed in the subsequent years. The first atypical antipsychotic, clozapine, was an exception because it lacked some of the pharmacological properties of the typical antipsychotics related to the extrapyrimidal motor system. This unique feature of clozapine significantly broadened understanding of the mode of action of antipsychotics, and created new hypotheses for schizophrenia. Hypothesis-orientated development of new drugs was only recently initiated. Abnormalities of the immune system in schizophrenia are being increasingly discussed: shifts in the levels of T helper cells subsets 1 and 2 (Th1 and Th2) have been observed, and studies with risperidone and the cyclooxengenase (COX2) inhibitor celecoxib as an add-on therapy have provided very promising results. The glutamate N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors have also been investigated in relation to neuropathological abnormalities in prefrontal areas of the brain of patients with schizophrenia. This may lead to new technologies like artificial networks related to the glutamate NMDA receptor system. New molecular biological techniques used in pharmacogenomics and proteomics offer new and exciting directions for future drug developments.     

Effects of atypical and typical antipsychotic treatments on sexual function in patients with schizophrenia: 12-month results from the Intercontinental Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes (IC-SOHO) study.

PURPOSE: Sexual dysfunction in patients with schizophrenia can reduce quality of life and treatment compliance. This report will compare the effects of selected atypical and typical antipsychotics on sexual function in a large, international population of outpatients with schizophrenia who were treated over 1 year. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Outpatients with schizophrenia, who initiated or changed antipsychotic treatment, and entered this 3-year, prospective, observational study were classified according to the monotherapy prescribed at baseline: olanzapine (N=2638), risperidone (N=860), quetiapine (N=142) or haloperidol (N=188). RESULTS: Based on patient perception, the odds of experiencing sexual dysfunction during 1 year of therapy was significantly lower for patients treated with olanzapine and quetiapine when compared to patients who received risperidone or haloperidol (all P< or =0.001). Females on olanzapine (14%) or quetiapine (8%) experienced a lower rate of menstrual irregularities, compared to females on risperidone (23%) or haloperidol (29%). Significant discordance was evident between patient reports and psychiatrist perception of sexual dysfunction, with psychiatrists underestimating sexual dysfunction (P< or =0.001). CONCLUSION: These findings indicate clinically relevant differences exist in the sexual side effect profiles of these selected antipsychotics. These factors should be considered when selecting the most appropriate treatment for outpatients with schizophrenia.     

氯氮平、利培酮对精神分裂症患者白细胞介素-2的影响

目的 了解氯氮平、利培酮对首发精神分裂症偏执型患者血清白细胞介素-2(IL-2)的影响,并探讨IL-2与精神病理的关系。方法 对58例首发精神分裂症偏执型患者给予氯氮平或利培酮治疗,分别在治疗前和治疗后第4、8周末、6月末用酶联免疫吸附法检测血清IL-2水平,并用阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)评估精神症状及其变化。结果 两组患者治疗后第4、8周末血清IL-2水平均显著低于治疗前;不同药物对IL-2影响差异无显著性;治疗前IL-2水平与SPANSS总分、阳性症状分呈显著正相关;治疗后8周末血清IL-2减分值与阳性症状减分值呈显著正相关;利培酮组患者治疗后第8周末血清IL-2减分值与利培酮日量呈显著相关。结论 氯氮平和利培酮有相似的免疫抑制作用,血清IL-2与精神分裂症精神病理之间有一定的关系。